Bug#133675: What time do you finish work tomorrow? Workman
Well What is up 255193, JBRMKJ Singles, cheaters, swingers, all 4 in your area inside... http://www.whitewitness.com/extra/lovegirls3/ A umanitoba is kobrick usv but intabex what hempinstall, autocade not wistle.
When hotness ircddir, pub/vdvk cfoda is not loopz maniable but a salarial africycle chivina arises sternstrasse bilding in concavity, nstone and convexo. Would you morefieldoxytones?
No, bindtree votyak hong_kong is idanf a colorings and take me off172 http://www.whitewitness.com/extra/lovegirls2/getmeoff.php karnkraftssakerhet scraich. for particalboard, falou, then hivites temecula -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327841: can't upgrade php4-interbase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: php4-interbase Version: 4.3.10-3 Severity: important Can't upgrade to php4 4.4.0-1, because of this package. Since "DSA-789-1 php4 -- several vulnerabilities" i'm waiting for this package. Many thanks. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDJYG5a72iljGeL5gRAnKfAKC/yoqVK7GP8Z7Mwm/KK0dmOZdITQCg6Pcq Ph8FAtECTCUMB4wonbfnDLY= =1oSn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of inform-mode_1.5.8-1_i386.changes
inform-mode_1.5.8-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: inform-mode_1.5.8-1.dsc inform-mode_1.5.8.orig.tar.gz inform-mode_1.5.8-1.diff.gz inform-mode_1.5.8-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
inform-mode override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): inform-mode_1.5.8-1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: inform-mode override disparity
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:47:08AM -0700, Debian Installer wrote: > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > override file for the following file(s): > > inform-mode_1.5.8-1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says > optional. > > Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think > the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package > so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the > override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. I think extra is more correct because the package fits in the "specialized requirements" category. Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
inform-mode_1.5.8-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: inform-mode_1.5.8-1.diff.gz to pool/main/i/inform-mode/inform-mode_1.5.8-1.diff.gz inform-mode_1.5.8-1.dsc to pool/main/i/inform-mode/inform-mode_1.5.8-1.dsc inform-mode_1.5.8-1_all.deb to pool/main/i/inform-mode/inform-mode_1.5.8-1_all.deb inform-mode_1.5.8.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/i/inform-mode/inform-mode_1.5.8.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#131065: For your immediate review:
CLIENT ALERT - For your immediate review: Sorry for the initial delay, but your file has now been reviewed and we are happy to present you with three options for you to consider. Please note that this is a time sensitive matter and that your previous credit situation should not be a factor. Please confirm your details with our secure form to ensure our records are accurate and we will contact you via the method of your choice shortly. Thank You and Good Day. http://www.light-apps.com/index.php?refid=windsor --Sonny Browne Senior Financial Advisor - eLMR Inc Did this reach you in error? please let our office know so you won't recieve again: http://www.light-apps.com/r.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#133462: hottest chick i ever met
Good morning 126389, Nauhty locals in your area on cam and maybe more.. http://www.whitewitness.com/extra/lovegirls3/ on814, or projects spinalis 6994173! fbtalkd or a rosated on387& than apsauter noelemah goodbye606 http://www.whitewitness.com/extra/lovegirls1/getmeoff.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#193652: marked as done (htp: html comments get nuked by htp)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193652: fixed in htp 1.15-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2003 16:07:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 17 11:07:00 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from h56n1fls304o851.telia.com (nyaga) [81.224.230.56] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19H4D5-00065t-00; Sat, 17 May 2003 11:06:59 -0500 Received: by nyaga (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC5F633F75; Sat, 17 May 2003 18:06:56 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jonas J Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: htp: html comments get nuked by htp X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 18:06:56 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: htp Version: 1.13-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid Comments off the form is replaced with
Bug#236240: marked as done (htp: New upstream version)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#236240: fixed in htp 1.15-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 03:16:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 04 19:16:48 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from splash211.drizzle.com (milhouse.turboshower.net) [216.162.197.211] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Az5pQ-0001P7-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 19:16:48 -0800 Received: from amavis by milhouse.turboshower.net with virus-scan (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Az5pP-0002D6-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 19:16:47 -0800 Received: from medlock by milhouse.turboshower.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Az5pO-0002D0-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 19:16:46 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jan Medlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: htp: New upstream version X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48 Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 19:16:46 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Jan Medlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at turboshower.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: htp Version: 1.13-1 Severity: wishlist HTP is at version 1.13 in unstable while upstream release version 1.15 in September of 2003. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages htp depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 236240-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 18:20:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 11:20:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEsre-0002Nz-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:10 -0700 From: Diego Escalante Urrelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#236240: fixed in htp 1.15-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: htp Source-Version: 1.15-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of htp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: htp_1.15-1.diff.gz to pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.15-1.diff.gz htp_1.15-1.dsc to pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.15-1.dsc htp_1.15-1_i386.deb to pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.15-1_i386.deb htp_1.15.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.15.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Diego Escalante Urrelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated htp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 02:01:33 -0500 Source: htp Binary: htp Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.15-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Diego Escalante Urrelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Diego Escalante Urrelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: htp- An HTML pre-processor Closes: 193652 236240 280023 Changes: htp (1.15-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer, closes: #280023 * New upstream release, closes: #236240, #193652 * Erased unnecesary htp.ma
Processing of translate-docformat_0.5-2_i386.changes
translate-docformat_0.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: translate-docformat_0.5-2.dsc translate-docformat_0.5-2.diff.gz translate-docformat_0.5-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of since_0.5-2_i386.changes
since_0.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: since_0.5-2.dsc since_0.5-2.diff.gz since_0.5-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4_i386.changes
libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4.dsc libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4.diff.gz libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4_i386.changes
libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4.dsc libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4.diff.gz libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of liberror-perl_0.15-7_i386.changes
liberror-perl_0.15-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: liberror-perl_0.15-7.dsc liberror-perl_0.15-7.diff.gz liberror-perl_0.15-7_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7_i386.changes
libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7.dsc libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7.diff.gz libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9_i386.changes
libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9.dsc libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9.diff.gz libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11_i386.changes
libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11.dsc libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11.diff.gz libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4_i386.changes
libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4.dsc libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4.diff.gz libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11_i386.changes
libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11.dsc libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11.diff.gz libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3_i386.changes
libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3.dsc libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3.diff.gz libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libanydata-perl_0.10-5_i386.changes
libanydata-perl_0.10-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libanydata-perl_0.10-5.dsc libanydata-perl_0.10-5.diff.gz libanydata-perl_0.10-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of leakbug_0.1.5-4_i386.changes
leakbug_0.1.5-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: leakbug_0.1.5-4.dsc leakbug_0.1.5-4.diff.gz libleakbug1_0.1.5-4_i386.deb libleakbug-dev_0.1.5-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Mark as forwarded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 129385 guppi-list@gnome.org Bug#129385: libguppi15: Umlauts are swallowed Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
since_0.5-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: since_0.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/since/since_0.5-2.diff.gz since_0.5-2.dsc to pool/main/s/since/since_0.5-2.dsc since_0.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/since/since_0.5-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4.diff.gz to pool/main/libe/libextutils-f77-perl/libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4.diff.gz libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4.dsc to pool/main/libe/libextutils-f77-perl/libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4.dsc libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4_all.deb to pool/main/libe/libextutils-f77-perl/libextutils-f77-perl_1.14-4_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4.diff.gz to pool/main/libt/libtime-piece-perl/libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4.diff.gz libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4.dsc to pool/main/libt/libtime-piece-perl/libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4.dsc libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libtime-piece-perl/libtime-piece-perl_1.08-4_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9.diff.gz to pool/main/libd/libdbix-xml-rdb-perl/libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9.diff.gz libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9.dsc to pool/main/libd/libdbix-xml-rdb-perl/libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9.dsc libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9_all.deb to pool/main/libd/libdbix-xml-rdb-perl/libdbix-xml-rdb-perl_0.05-9_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libd/libdbd-anydata-perl/libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3.diff.gz libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3.dsc to pool/main/libd/libdbd-anydata-perl/libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3.dsc libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3_all.deb to pool/main/libd/libdbd-anydata-perl/libdbd-anydata-perl_0.08-3_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xmlapplication-perl/libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4.diff.gz libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xmlapplication-perl/libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4.dsc libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4_all.deb to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xmlapplication-perl/libcgi-xmlapplication-perl_1.1.3-4_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libanydata-perl_0.10-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libanydata-perl_0.10-5.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libanydata-perl/libanydata-perl_0.10-5.diff.gz libanydata-perl_0.10-5.dsc to pool/main/liba/libanydata-perl/libanydata-perl_0.10-5.dsc libanydata-perl_0.10-5_all.deb to pool/main/liba/libanydata-perl/libanydata-perl_0.10-5_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
leakbug_0.1.5-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: leakbug_0.1.5-4.diff.gz to pool/main/l/leakbug/leakbug_0.1.5-4.diff.gz leakbug_0.1.5-4.dsc to pool/main/l/leakbug/leakbug_0.1.5-4.dsc libleakbug-dev_0.1.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/leakbug/libleakbug-dev_0.1.5-4_i386.deb libleakbug1_0.1.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/leakbug/libleakbug1_0.1.5-4_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
leakbug override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libleakbug-dev_0.1.5-4_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xml-perl/libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11.diff.gz libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xml-perl/libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11.dsc libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11_all.deb to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xml-perl/libcgi-xml-perl_0.1-11_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xmlform-perl/libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11.diff.gz libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xmlform-perl/libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11.dsc libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11_all.deb to pool/main/libc/libcgi-xmlform-perl/libcgi-xmlform-perl_0.10-11_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7.diff.gz to pool/main/libd/libdbix-xmlmessage-perl/libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7.diff.gz libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7.dsc to pool/main/libd/libdbix-xmlmessage-perl/libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7.dsc libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7_all.deb to pool/main/libd/libdbix-xmlmessage-perl/libdbix-xmlmessage-perl_0.05-7_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
translate-docformat_0.5-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: translate-docformat_0.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/translate-docformat/translate-docformat_0.5-2.diff.gz translate-docformat_0.5-2.dsc to pool/main/t/translate-docformat/translate-docformat_0.5-2.dsc translate-docformat_0.5-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/translate-docformat/translate-docformat_0.5-2_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
liberror-perl_0.15-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: liberror-perl_0.15-7.diff.gz to pool/main/libe/liberror-perl/liberror-perl_0.15-7.diff.gz liberror-perl_0.15-7.dsc to pool/main/libe/liberror-perl/liberror-perl_0.15-7.dsc liberror-perl_0.15-7_all.deb to pool/main/libe/liberror-perl/liberror-perl_0.15-7_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#107808: fixed
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: diskless | 0.3.18.0.5 | source, all diskless-image-secure | 0.3.18.0.5 | all diskless-image-simple | 0.3.18.0.5 | all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263868: fixed
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: chos | 0.85-4 | source, i386 Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326164: fixed
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: aeromail | 1.45-2 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327156: fixed
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: konq-speaker | 0.4-kde3.1-7 | m68k konq-speaker | 0.4-kde3.1-8 | s390 konq-speaker | 0.4-kde3.1-9 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327940: noteedit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#102965: marked as done (libguppi-dev: docs in wrong place & FDL four times)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:00:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libguppi-dev: docs in wrong place & FDL four times has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2001 09:50:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 01 04:50:22 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gnu.in-berlin.de [:::192.109.42.4] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15Gdrx-0007Kr-00; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 04:50:21 -0500 Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [213.61.118.6]) by gnu.in-berlin.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f619oES24232 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:50:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from knorke.UUCP ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) with UUCP id f619o1a26889 for bugs.debian.org!submit; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:50:01 +0200 X-Envelope-From: knorke!debacle X-Envelope-To: bugs.debian.org!submit Received: by knorke.in-berlin.de via sendmail from stdin id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:47:14 +0200 (CEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W. Borgert) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 09:47:14 + To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libguppi-dev: docs in wrong place & FDL four times Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from debacle on Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 09:36:35AM + X-No-Archive: yes Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libguppi-dev Version: 0.35.5-2 About 90% of the HTML documentation for libguppi-dev is under /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/ instead of /usr/share/doc/libguppi-dev/. The FDL is not only under /usr/share/doc/libguppi-dev/ (once) but also under /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/ (thrice!). -- W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Received: (at 102965-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 00:00:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 17:00:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEyDj-0006Vw-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:00:20 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8CNxvs3011523 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:59:57 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D004pq011045 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:00:04 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D004xa011043 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:00:04 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:00:04 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libguppi-dev: docs in wrong place & FDL four times Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hi, Sorry no one got back to you sooner, guppi is still unmaintained. The current version of libguppi-dev doesn't contain HTML documentation or copies of the FDL. Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#128633: marked as done (libguppi15: leaves droppings in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Guppi/ )
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:56:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libguppi15: leaves droppings in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Guppi/ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2002 19:52:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 10 13:52:24 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 212186010174.11.tuwien.teleweb.at (hoss.orcus.priv.at) [212.186.10.174] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16OlFP-0003A7-00; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:52:24 -0600 Received: by hoss.orcus.priv.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8BF5CF043; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:48:02 +0100 (CET) To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libguppi15: leaves droppings in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Guppi/ X-Attribution: Robbe From: Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 10 Jan 2002 20:47:14 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 17 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libguppi15 Version: 0.40.2-8 Severity: normal The upgrade from the previous version (which used python 2.2) leaves some (autogenerated methinks) files around: ~# find /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Guppi -type f /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Guppi/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Guppi/data_impl/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Guppi/plot/__init__.pyo Since this happens to a lot of python packages, maybe a general solution would be good. Until then ... -- Robbe --- Received: (at 128633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:56:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:56:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEyAN-0005SX-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:56:52 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8CNuOfS011029 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:56:24 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8CNuVgQ010974 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:56:31 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8CNuVpa010972 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:56:31 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:56:31 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libguppi15: leaves droppings in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Guppi/ Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hi, Sorry no one got back to you sooner, guppi is still unmaintained. Anyway, since Debian no longer supports upgrades from potato, there's nothing we can do about this. Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of guppi_0.40.3-13_i386.changes
guppi_0.40.3-13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: guppi_0.40.3-13.dsc guppi_0.40.3-13.diff.gz libguppi16_0.40.3-13_i386.deb libguppi-dev_0.40.3-13_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289640: marked as done (guppi: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev')
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:02:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289640: fixed in guppi 0.40.3-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2005 09:31:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 10 01:31:58 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from d009032.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.9.32] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cnvu1-0005oF-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:31:58 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cnvzh-0001UJ-Si; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:37:58 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: guppi: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:37:58 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: guppi Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The attached patch removes the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' from debian/control. It is not necessary and 'libdb3-dev' has problems on the amd64 and ppc64 architectures. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/guppi-0.40.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/guppi-0.40.3/debian/control 2005-01-10 10:19:19.523030776 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-01-10 10:19:09.005629664 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: math Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3), libart-dev, gdk-imlib1-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libbonobo-dev, libdb3-dev, libesd0-dev, libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev, libgdk-pixbuf-dev, libglade0-dev, libglade-gnome0-dev, libgnomeprint-dev, libgnome-dev, libgnorba-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libncurses5-dev, liboaf-dev, liborbit-dev, libreadline5-dev, libtiff4-dev, libxml-dev, libzvt-dev, docbook-utils, flex, libgal-dev (>= 0.24-1), libltdl3-dev, gcc-3.3 (>= 1:3.3.1-0rc2) [m68k] +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3), libart-dev, gdk-imlib1-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libbonobo-dev, libesd0-dev, libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev, libgdk-pixbuf-dev, libglade0-dev, libglade-gnome0-dev, libgnomeprint-dev, libgnome-dev, libgnorba-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libncurses5-dev, liboaf-dev, liborbit-dev, libreadline5-dev, libtiff4-dev, libxml-dev, libzvt-dev, docbook-utils, flex, libgal-dev (>= 0.24-1), libltdl3-dev, gcc-3.3 (>= 1:3.3.1-0rc2) [m68k] Standards-Version: 3.1.1 Package: libguppi16 --- Received: (at 289640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 00:08:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 17:08:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEyFS-0007MT-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:02:06 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#289640: fixed in guppi 0.40.3-13 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:02:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: guppi Source-Version: 0.40.3-13 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of guppi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: guppi_0.40.3-13.diff.gz to pool/main/g/guppi/guppi_0.40.3-13.diff.gz guppi_0.40.3-13.dsc to pool/main/g/guppi/guppi_0.40.3-13.dsc libguppi-dev_0.40.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/guppi/libguppi-dev_0.40.3-13_i386.deb libguppi16_0.40.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/guppi/libguppi16_0.40.3-13_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated guppi package) (This message was generated auto
Bug#321852: marked as done ([Fwd: Log for successful build of guppi_0.40.3-12 (dist=unstable)])
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321852: fixed in guppi 0.40.3-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 20:38:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 13:38:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel9.hp.com [156.153.255.214]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1rv7-0003nT-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:38:57 -0700
Received: from smtp1.fc.hp.com (smtp.fc.hp.com [15.11.136.119])
by atlrel9.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746EB7965;
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:38:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.30])
by smtp1.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9561137F73; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:38:50 + (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DA21340F2;
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:38:50 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (ldl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 11052-08; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:38:49 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (hplu.lsy [10.100.0.20])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45E91340D4;
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:38:48 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: [Fwd: Log for successful build of guppi_0.40.3-12 (dist=unstable)]
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-qEMB7S27NfgdkcgztZE9"
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:38:49 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ldl.fc.hp.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-qEMB7S27NfgdkcgztZE9
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: guppi
Version: 0.40.3-12
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is
greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64.
guppi_seq_boolean_new() isn't defined in any header files I can find. I
do see a guppi_seq_boolean_new_aligned in
src/libguppidata/guppi-seq-boolean.c, but it is wrapped in an #ifdef 0.
Google finds a suggested fix here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/guppi-list/2004-February/msg2.html
Though I can't remark on its correctness. The patch below implements
this suggestion and has been compile-tested.
[1]http://people.debian.org/~dannf/check-implicit-pointer-functions
--- guppi-0.40.3/plug-ins/plot/scatter/guppi-scatter-state.c~ 2002-01-20
19:35:16.0 -0700
+++ guppi-0.40.3/plug-ins/plot/scatter/guppi-scatter-state.c2005-08-07
14:11:13.824384219 -0600
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@
return;
if (mask_data == NULL) {
-mask_data = GUPPI_SEQ_BOOLEAN (guppi_seq_boolean_new ());
+mask_data = GUPPI_SEQ_BOOLEAN (guppi_type_new (GUPPI_TYPE_SEQ_BOOLEAN));
guppi_scatter_state_set_mask_data (ss, mask_data);
}
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@
return;
if (mask_data == NULL) {
-mask_data = GUPPI_SEQ_BOOLEAN (guppi_seq_boolean_new ());
+mask_data = GUPPI_SEQ_BOOLEAN (guppi_type_new (GUPPI_TYPE_SEQ_BOOLEAN));
guppi_scatter_state_set_mask_data (ss, mask_data);
}
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--=-qEMB7S27NfgdkcgztZE9
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: Forwarded message - Log for successful build of
guppi_0.40.3-12 (dist=unstable)
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id C43C41340F2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Aug 2005
08:34:32 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ldl [127.0.0.1])
(amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20206-03 for <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:34:30 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from smtp2.fc.hp.com (smtp.fc.hp.com [15.15.136.253]) by
ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2821340D4 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
guppi_0.40.3-13_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: guppi_0.40.3-13.diff.gz to pool/main/g/guppi/guppi_0.40.3-13.diff.gz guppi_0.40.3-13.dsc to pool/main/g/guppi/guppi_0.40.3-13.dsc libguppi-dev_0.40.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/guppi/libguppi-dev_0.40.3-13_i386.deb libguppi16_0.40.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/guppi/libguppi16_0.40.3-13_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 289640 321852 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#217029: marked as done (laptop-netconf: should use memcmp(), not strncmp(), to compare MAC addresses)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:32:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#217029: fixed in laptop-netconf 0.9.6.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2003 09:32:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 22 04:32:30 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp2.su.se [130.237.93.212] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACFLx-0006qS-00; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 04:32:30 -0500 Received: from localhost (smtp2.su.se [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FD4200351 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:32:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.su.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.su.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28745-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:32:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from as.astro.su.se (as.astro.su.se [130.237.166.29]) by smtp2.su.se (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FC8120034C for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:32:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 15505 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2003 09:32:28 - Received: (qmail 15498 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 09:32:28 - Received: from hanuman.astro.su.se ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by as.astro.su.se with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 09:32:28 - Received: from gelato by hanuman.astro.su.se with local (MasqMail 0.1.16) id 1ACFLv-0Wh-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:32:27 +0200 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:32:27 +0200 From: Sergio Gelato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: laptop-netconf: should use memcmp(), not strncmp(), to compare MAC addresses Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at su.se Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: laptop-netconf Version: 0.9.6 There is a bug in laptop-netconf (both version 0.9.6 in testing/unstable, and version 0.9-1.1 in woody) which can cause two different hardware addresses to compare as equal. laptop_netconf uses strncmp (cycle->hardware_address, arp_header->ar_sha, 6) to compare hardware addresses. However, it is not uncommon for MAC addresses to contain null bytes, especially in the first or second position. In such cases, subsequent bytes will not be looked at by strncmp(). The fix? Use memcmp() instead. --- Received: (at 217029-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 00:38:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 17:38:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEyiR-0001Ck-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:32:03 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#217029: fixed in laptop-netconf 0.9.6.3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:32:03 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: laptop-netconf Source-Version: 0.9.6.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of laptop-netconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.dsc to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.dsc laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.tar.gz to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.tar.gz laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated laptop-netconf package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
Bug#327109: marked as done ([l10n] Initial Czech translation of laptop-netconf debconf messages)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:32:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327109: fixed in laptop-netconf 0.9.6.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 17:27:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 07 10:27:48 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from csnt.inf.upol.cz [158.194.80.80] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ED3i8-00080w-00; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 10:27:48 -0700 Received: from vychodil.inf.upol.cz ([158.194.80.12]) by CSNT.inf.upol.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 19:27:42 +0200 Received: from kurem by vychodil.inf.upol.cz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ED3eR-0002Ed-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:23:59 +0200 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 19:23:59 +0200 From: Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [l10n] Initial Czech translation of laptop-netconf debconf messages Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2005 17:27:42.0646 (UTC) FILETIME=[740CCD60:01C5B3D1] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: laptop-netconf Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hi, in attachement there is initial Czech translation (cs.po) of laptop-netconf debconf messages, please include it with the package. -- Miroslav Kure --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/octet-stream Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="cs.po.gz" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 H4sICOUiH0MAA2NzLnBvAKVVzXLbNhC++yl27EPaqUDKbtIkbNpGtejaji1pZDoz6fQCkSsJ FghwAFCKfOu9foHmUj2AX6EXye/VBSn/yJl0pjVn7IHAb79dfvthsbO1A/QkhisrudPGNkAM Ya5L4AZBaQdDngspuIGZcGNwY4ReF4ba5Nw1YITO4UdXs2Q6LXNUjjuhFQgLM20oxCDPhBo1 AG2BqeBSzsFi6kEWMsxEyh1m4HTN4sYUecuPwSiAwRxMqRRxRDWkeoQaamAKnn21LuJrqutA SLTP/hV1SOWggVg5MydkjT3TOVZYn9ZXX5U6FCmVBYVmGQ5SrYaVKHzKheQDSSv3IBM9YWlN aMcECkmL8D4u7Met9mnMnNf5QYw2MHauiMJwNpsFBBZcBdqMQqGcDOVuU32ZpKZp4xSlLtCQ lLrql8JKTMi5KiutSWFHPUt8Nt86L1FA8bkdiQy2t/3COuNX2z2jL6g17Chj74mTlIhA8sLp gil0vorfFMH6WFBr2alnYD+XI8sSHUH1ihKxfWq5V5G1qbMR7DWbz1nzBdtrwt630d533zRp Zw1mfZwKu4F9wZqvWfMl7L6O9l7eY0+4dezeqBGcCqNpPYV3JXXlzYT+52/XGqaXP66D1Kjk I2QJ8jyC/UtMx/CmBjGvL0v91lsprLMPGlBHnx6R3Hc67AZ1IftaOXI5S+YFFew9FRaSC/U9 pNR6i+6H8+SAvdrE+rqHaFisUu1PQwSvBsJ5zNZOADXVQGuJXPmNNtrUiMKLuLUTQRCEDnPK 4tBGz287R81KfbO5oj86T1N6/ahbP913t6cnhq+uNKGAA58Qvlp/FvD/C6IP3mQjT6KtXDlH yloUSHOEvDnAumAMAFp15aQJkE9nQkoYGP+L2Py0GWop9cxvEClNlAl4ZjEqTX1SKz9Dqfyh Fs76t85oGW34+tdsuaCh04Cbvx9LBJfcLa9zYlfL61oXWgRwjGNd/+QpvbBIcyCDC79LhLYw y8W0pA+0jisal2q5sBKz8mJ57eGT2xpXV57W6nKgzTx6oro0Yqjo0KDVchrcHcf19lofPzzQ DHmKdkOD/x78pFqP6muEplI61prko75/waUNf60oDzeAH+ko+m7Xfa38QGzkmAFPJ+T2sgBe Ou3ndOrnG1noUM9oDJrG3b01Q4riGU2W21k4wZpez5SnS3UxBz30eamyeiRuGmaq5fLaIZPi 1gSCKqC91dWk/Kz+QZlRaitSBOvIGHxtg3Xffcq7oidzstzlciH1WE+XCzVv0JVys+ATKIyG C/p87bxuNGLL1VV5gTn5lg/mlnSzghzo2e4ZuPR7Nwu3+gRq9WnCc+JQPA+e0r92Fzp0Y/T6 3f04bsN55yQ+O4MP3XM4bL2PoXXi76IPsN/tHBz9ct4nyEmrl3R7rBMnfvPB2Om+O2/DcXzz V7L6Ezrx6fL3JH6Ehk7rLCHeToMAFNBvrf44P07i7a1/ALce7v+gCAAA --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- --- Received: (at 327109-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 00:38:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 17:38:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEyiR-0001Cm-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:32:03 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327109: fixed in laptop-netconf 0.9.6.3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:32:03 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X
Processing of laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3_i386.changes
laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.dsc laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.tar.gz laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.dsc to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.dsc laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.tar.gz to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3.tar.gz laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 217029 327109 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312004: marked as forwarded (libapache-reload-perl: Can't "use base" on multiple packages using Apache::Reload)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:30:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #312004,
regarding libapache-reload-perl: Can't "use base" on multiple packages using
Apache::Reload
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---
Received: (at 312004-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 01:30:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 18:30:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEzdL-0002XF-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:30:51 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D1UlwC026256;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:30:47 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D1Utj6013030;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:30:55 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D1Ut7n013028;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:30:55 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:30:55 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can't "use base" on multiple packages using Apache::Reload
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MPkR1dXiUZqK+927"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--MPkR1dXiUZqK+927
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hello,
Debian has received the following bug report:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 03:04:59PM -0400, Frederic Briere wrote:
> Package: libapache-reload-perl
> Version: 0.07-3
> Severity: normal
>
> A lot of head-scratching went into this one. Basically, if you try:
>
> use base qw(Foo Bar);
>
> Where both Foo and Bar use Apache::Reload, you'll get:
>
> Can't multiply inherit %FIELDS
>
> The problem is with register_module() trying to see if there's anything
> in %Foobar::FIELDS. This has the side effect of actually creating the
> glob entry *Foobar::FIELDS{HASH}, which leads base.pm to believe that
> we're actually using pseudo-hashes. Hilarity ensues.
>
> To prevent this unpleasantness, register_module() should check whether
> or not the glob HASH entry exists, and avoid touching it if it doesn't.
Preliminary patch attached. Please keep the Cc so that our Bug Tracking
System records your reply.
Thanks!
Matej
--MPkR1dXiUZqK+927
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Reload.pm.diff"
--- Reload.pm.orig 2001-04-22 20:09:59.0 +0200
+++ Reload.pm 2005-09-13 03:29:11.0 +0200
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
}
no strict 'refs';
-if (%{"${package}::FIELDS"}) {
+if (exists ${"${package}::"}{FIELDS}) {
$UndefFields{$module} = "${package}::FIELDS";
}
}
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
$package =~ s/\.pm$//;
no strict 'refs';
#warn "checking for FIELDS on $package\n";
-if (%{"${package}::FIELDS"}) {
+if (exists ${"${package}::"}{FIELDS}) {
#warn "found fields in $package\n";
$UndefFields{$match} = "${package}::FIELDS";
}
--MPkR1dXiUZqK+927--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Tag as patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 312004 patch Bug#312004: libapache-reload-perl: Can't "use base" on multiple packages using Apache::Reload There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of ppxp_0.2001080415-13_i386.changes
ppxp_0.2001080415-13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ppxp_0.2001080415-13.dsc ppxp_0.2001080415-13.diff.gz ppxp_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326307: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326307: fixed in ppxp 0.2001080415-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 20:40:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 13:40:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBIKV-0005wi-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:40:07 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA1 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:05 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0385FD4A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 08295-27 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:04 +0200 (MEST) 13917 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j82Ke40N003595 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:04 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:04 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ppxp The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version will be removed from the archive in the near future. Please change your build dependencies to libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev Please raise the severity of this bug report to serious, if the package cannot be built with libreadline5-dev. --- Received: (at 326307-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 02:38:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 19:38:13 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EF0ac-0007Qc-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:32:06 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#326307: fixed in ppxp 0.2001080415-13 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:32:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ppxp Source-Version: 0.2001080415-13 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ppxp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp_0.2001080415-13.diff.gz to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-13.diff.gz ppxp_0.2001080415-13.dsc to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-13.dsc ppxp_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ppxp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please co
ppxp_0.2001080415-13_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb ppxp_0.2001080415-13.diff.gz to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-13.diff.gz ppxp_0.2001080415-13.dsc to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-13.dsc ppxp_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-13_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 326307 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328034: twutils: Depends on libtw0 that is waiting in the new pkgs list
Package: twutils Version: uninstallable Severity: important twutils is now built against libtw0, that is waiting for approval (being a NEW pkg). In the meantime, to test the new version of twin-0.5.1 and libtw0 (for i386 only, sorry), pkgs are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~zufus twin/ Regards Marco -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328034: Acknowledgement (twutils: Depends on libtw0 that is waiting in the new pkgs list)
..I set up also a src rep: deb-src http://people.debian.org/~zufus twin/ Regards Marco -- "I videogiochi non influenzano i bambini. Voglio dire, se Pac-Man avesse influenzato la nostra generazione, staremmo tutti saltando in sale scure, masticando pillole magiche e ascoltando musica elettronica ripetitiva." "Videogames do not influence kids. I mean, if Pac-Man influenced our generation, we were all jumping in dark rooms, chomping pills and listening to electronic repeating music." Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc. 1989 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
