Processing of php4-imagick_0.9.11-2_i386.changes
php4-imagick_0.9.11-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.dsc php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.diff.gz php4-imagick_0.9.11-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272687: marked as done (php4-imagick: image handle is not a resource)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:47:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272687: fixed in php4-imagick 0.9.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2004 14:02:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 21 07:02:55 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from host0406.cammail.net (campbell-lange.net) [217.206.202.27] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C9lEN-0007ga-00; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:02:55 -0700 Received: from host-83-146-33-145.bulldogdsl.com ([83.146.33.145] helo=roz) by host0406 with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C9lNJ-00039Z-3c for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:12:14 +0100 Received: from rory by roz with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C9lEE-qS-Hj; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:02:46 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rory Campbell-Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: php4-imagick: image handle is not a resource X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:02:46 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: php4-imagick Version: 0.9.7-1.3 Severity: normal When reading an image into a handle, php4-imagick (suddenly!) does not set this the handle as a resource type. Please check the following failure from the examples directory below. Thanks, Rory rory 02:57 PM:/usr/share/doc/php4-imagick/examples$php4 scale.php Warning: imagick_iserror() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /usr/share/doc/php4-imagick/examples/scale.php on line 3 Warning: imagick_scale() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /usr/share/doc/php4-imagick/examples/scale.php on line 12 Warning: imagick_failedreason() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /usr/share/doc/php4-imagick/examples/scale.php on line 14 Warning: imagick_faileddescription() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /usr/share/doc/php4-imagick/examples/scale.php on line 15 imagick_scale() failed Reason: Description: rory 02:58 PM:/usr/share/doc/php4-imagick/examples$ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages php4-imagick depends on: ii libbz2-1.01.0.2-1A high-quality block-sorting file ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjasper-1.701-1 1.701.0-2 The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime libra ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liblcms1 1.12-2.1 Color management library ii libmagick65:6.0.7.1-1Image manipulation library ii libpng12-01.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management ii libtiff4 3.6.1-1.1 Tag Image File Format library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxml2 2.6.11-3 GNOME XML library ii libxt64.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii php4-cgi [phpapi-20020918 4:4.3.8-9 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918 4:4.3.8-9 command-line interpreter for the p ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.1.1-7compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 272687-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 06:48:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 23:48:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org wit
Bug#316823: marked as done (INTL:vi)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:47:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316823: fixed in php4-imagick 0.9.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2005 04:56:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 21:56:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DpJ0s-0005Oc-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:56:59 -0700 Received: from [10.1.1.91] (ppp196-122.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [203.122.196.122]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j644uukf093614 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:26:57 +0930 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) To: Submit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-34-411894233 From: Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: INTL:vi Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:26:54 +0930 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --Apple-Mail-34-411894233 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Package: php4-imagick Version: 0.9.11-1 Severity: minor Tags: l10n, patch The Vietnamese translation for debconf: php4-imagick --Apple-Mail-34-411894233 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/x-gzip; x-mac-type=477A6970; x-unix-mode=0755; name="php4-imagick_0.9.11-1.vi.po.tgz" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=php4-imagick_0.9.11-1.vi.po.tgz H4sICMoaGckAAHBocDQtaW1hZ2lja18wLjkuMTEtMS52aS5wby50YXIAxVTPb9xEFM45f8VT0ltj x97upqnb0NL8gEgJRE1UgYSEZu239lB7xpoZb7qqeuLAEeWEOCBSUIVoqQSkEtL6gNRF/B/+T3hj b7qbCkgpUfcd1jPj9773vW8+b57kbYdnLObhvU8995rr+47v9rmby7mLCo/iaqfTPFemnk206eWc 77VWWn7b67RW6Nxf8dv+nDf3FqLQhilqGaYDw/Gf8855fzrMy+drxqxjEe5yNIJlqBGMYkKnzHAp oCcVTJvDnV+EdZkPFI8TAy9+hJbndWBLIcK+7JlDphC2ZCGiunwJtkVYl1jZKIVHEUtTuNHIeEvx PqqUicgVaFxWvLNU49mK+UzHPIKFBbvQRtnVwp6Sn2FonO3IuYtKU4fgDDs4te4ngrLvYC6VcXYt kHO7iLVzIAOoX+19eOCsK6xJOhvMYGAbtx1v1fGugr8atK9c9uhknOzcwT7XZ3I7lOh4bfDbQatz 2bt2pcndYdo4B2MBpQpee/JxtYgLFqNzgCwLpu/kRixkRiSclGtzy/5oV8tChUg3FKNFaSB2t3c3 J+L4bkNrXQqDgpgNcqJv8L5ZzlPGxXUIE6Y0mrXC9JzVqdzxFD1UzqYIZcRFHMBql5tGkrRQLHW2 pMp0ACKvt3rNvw7Ncq1p+5HzHgpUjRI7MtxiIS0HmxGnB5FruS2bN7/oNsS6UqbIBO03UIeK53Q/ tAtcd/mMCQ1mRN+gDtqnPtlPZJFGcOkB3q81ewhdBBZFGIGRsIwmrCGWLz3QLOehFD0eP7RHLhf8 5sRl66MTEKMnAkwyepLBi6cTxBcl9EfHks7OgaPEe8nouYhvXsxspOTHsgD7bXGhDfmIbmN6VF3k 1uovv9YlIGcBN8A1CGlggAZQsG6KdCqA8EyC0LAu1ORLt6dnJoL9d/e2XYANCQNicMiEoSRCpdYo rMdIXYvXxdMG1PBwSs+d0TAkQY8H0K2GjwT8ccSIezg65rSshr8ZWj8KE0iq8iv656nK71/VPEwk 7L2/R0OJ5M+fqTgbHRPiCYS0ZRb2maFKaWGr4eMCktFPIrFlNfsabjISIbpwu6YSEkZWVOWRgIRX 5RcFpFX5S0gKVsMfBGRV+S0Qoa8JuB5AxIymGH03gJjSv7mQO/Zb/2pghZnsk6Y9JbM3MXEqaVJO GpVfviqrYm/LyJMhJ04ej3auj7uFGftYG56mUy6uzUp4/8HFO8hsx9rBFoHohQiHhGuBciW7BD6A kBX0j0tb6pRpOEyQmqlBXSmB3lk7uudYfFr6cy2u2N87vF8Nn1qf/ireyOYfVMPfi4bU+B7pD+x5 Y3Zbf8JslyVQhGfqz8EQx88hJo9bTikR5k1PqufUtzwCXZXPIKrKx3TY6DD3/2PWMeuYdcw6Zh2z jlnHX2i4ja0ADgAA --Apple-Mail-34-411894233 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed translated and submitted by: Clytie Siddall (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / =20 nh=C3=B3m Vi=E1=BB=87t h=C3=B3a ph=E1=BA=A7n m=E1=BB=81m t=E1=BB=B1 do) --Apple-Mail-34-411894233-- --- Received: (at 316823-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 06:50:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 23:50:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EELcL-0003dR-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:47:09 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#316823: fixed in php4-imagick 0.9.11-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:47:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.o
Bug#317634: marked as done (php4-imagick: Segfaults when calling imagick functions)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:47:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317634: fixed in php4-imagick 0.9.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2005 09:53:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 10 02:53:45 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katherina.student.utwente.nl [130.89.168.160] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DrYVN-0003mj-00; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 02:53:45 -0700 Received: from matthijs by katherina.student.utwente.nl with local (Exim 4.52) id 1DrYVL-0002pQ-Pl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:53:43 +0200 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:53:43 +0200 From: Matthijs Kooijman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: php4-imagick: Segfaults when calling imagick functions Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 10 01:10:08 2005 X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: php4-imagick Version: 0.9.11-1 Followup-For: Bug #298448 Severity: important Since some times, my php-imagick module has broken down. At first glance this bug seems identical to #298448 (archived), though it seems to show the same symptoms as #272687 too. I have first noticed segfaults appearing in my apache error.log: [Sat Jul 9 21:50:44 2005] [notice] child pid 28074 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) Which is the same symptom as #298448. In both bug reports this is claimed to be fixed in 0.9.11-0.2 and 0.9.11-1. I have 0.9.11-1 installed, which does not seem to fix the problem (not that the last post in the archived #298448 did not acknowledge the fix). Some extra debugging shows there is some kind of problem when cleaning up, I managed to make the following stacktrace (Unfortunately still with the original .deb, didn't get around to compiling with debugging symbols yet). > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread -1210791712 (LWP 31810)] > 0xb7b3edfa in _efree () from /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > (gdb) > (gdb) > (gdb) bt > #0 0xb7b3edfa in _efree () from /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > #1 0xb77638e8 in zm_deactivate_imagick () from > /usr/lib/php4/20020429/imagick.so > #2 0xb7b514d9 in module_registry_cleanup () from > /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > #3 0xb7b53949 in zend_hash_apply () from /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > #4 0xb7b4e3d0 in zend_deactivate_modules () from > /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > #5 0xb7b1f315 in php_request_shutdown () from /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > #6 0xb7b631df in apache_php_module_main () from > /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > #7 0xb7b63ddc in apache_php_module_main () from > /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > #8 0xb7b63fa1 in apache_php_module_main () from > /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so > #9 0x080553c3 in ap_invoke_handler () > #10 0x08068465 in ap_some_auth_required () > #11 0x08068614 in ap_process_request () > #12 0x08060bd2 in ap_child_terminate () > #13 0x08060e9a in ap_child_terminate () > #14 0x08060f10 in ap_child_terminate () > #15 0x08061a9a in ap_child_terminate () > #16 0x08061ff8 in main () > (gdb) quit This stacktrace was made by running apache in single mode and requesting line.php from the examples. I also tried running the same from the command line (using all of "php", "php4" and "php4-cgi") on several files, all giving a similar output. The following is from running line.php. > > Warning: imagick_iserror() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean > given in /var/www/examples/line.php on line 3 > > Warning: imagick_begindraw() expects parameter 1 to be resource, > boolean given in /var/www/examples/line.php on line 12 > > Warning: imagick_drawline() expects parameter 1 to be resource, > boolean given in /var/www/examples/line.php on line 14 > > Warning: imagick_failedreason() expects parameter 1 to be resource,
Bug#324005: marked as done (php4-imagick not updated for new phpapi version)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:47:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324005: fixed in php4-imagick 0.9.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 18:25:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 11:25:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katherina.student.utwente.nl [130.89.168.160] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E6BYa-0001tA-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:25:32 -0700 Received: from matthijs by katherina.student.utwente.nl with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E6BYZ-00067O-2g; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:25:31 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthijs Kooijman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: php4-imagick not updated for new phpapi version X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:25:31 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: php4-imagick Version: 0.9.11-1 Severity: important There are new versions of the php4 packages: 4.4.0. The phpapi version in these packages changed, so I can now not upgrade my php, without breaking php4-imagick. Gr. Matthijs --- Received: (at 324005-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 06:48:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 23:48:27 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EELcL-0003dV-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:47:09 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#324005: fixed in php4-imagick 0.9.11-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:47:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: php4-imagick Source-Version: 0.9.11-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of php4-imagick, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/php4-imagick/php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.diff.gz php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.dsc to pool/main/p/php4-imagick/php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.dsc php4-imagick_0.9.11-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/php4-imagick/php4-imagick_0.9.11-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated php4-imagick package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:34:04 +0200 Source: php4-imagick Binary: php4-imagick Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.11-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: php4-imagick - ImageMagick module for php4 Closes: 272687 316823 317634 324005 Changes: php4-imagick (0.9.11-2) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Update for php4/php5 split (s/phpize/phpize4/; s/php-config/php-config4/). * Recompile for phpapi-20050606. Closes: #317634, #324005, #272687. * Update templates based on php4 4:4.4.0-1 (which includes a Vietnamese translation). Closes: #316823. * Update debconf dependency. * debian/copyright: Update upstream URL. * debian/watch: Add. * Conforms to Standards version 3.6.2. Files: 2edc4636707266f4de6731491806e639 656 web optional php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.dsc 72823979cc171d3c64b677e
php4-imagick_0.9.11-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/php4-imagick/php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.diff.gz php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.dsc to pool/main/p/php4-imagick/php4-imagick_0.9.11-2.dsc php4-imagick_0.9.11-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/php4-imagick/php4-imagick_0.9.11-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 272687 316823 317634 324005 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of xed_0.9.1-5_i386.changes
xed_0.9.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xed_0.9.1-5.dsc xed_0.9.1-5.diff.gz xed_0.9.1-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xed_0.9.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: xed_0.9.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xed/xed_0.9.1-5.diff.gz xed_0.9.1-5.dsc to pool/main/x/xed/xed_0.9.1-5.dsc xed_0.9.1-5_all.deb to pool/main/x/xed/xed_0.9.1-5_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327587: noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0
Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: wishlist Please upgrade to the new Noteedit version 2.8.0. The current version in debian unstable is uninstallable at the moment, anyhow. Best regards, TMS -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages noteedit depends on: pn kdelibs4 (no description available) ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgamin0 [libfam0c102] 0.1.5-2Client library for the gamin file ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime pn libqt3c102-mt (no description available) ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 pn libtse3-0.2.7 (no description available) ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra pn noteedit-data (no description available) ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime noteedit recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Merging "new upstream version" bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 327587 Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#327587: noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0 Owner recorded as Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > merge 300380 305091 327587 Bug#300380: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NoteEdit 2.7.4] Bug#305091: noteedit: Upgrade to 2.7.4 Bug#327587: noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0 Merged 300380 305091 327587. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205682: marked as done (zope-ldap: uninstallable due to transition python-ldap -> pythonN.M-ldaptor)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:09:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line zope-ldap: uninstallable due to transition python-ldap -> pythonN.M-ldaptor has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2003 06:56:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 16 01:56:06 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from p5085146e.dip.t-dialin.net (spruce.oeko.net) [80.133.20.110] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19nuyr-0003sm-00; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 01:56:05 -0500 Received: (qmail 3347 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Aug 2003 06:56:04 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" From: Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: zope-ldap: uninstallable due to transition python-ldap -> pythonN.M-ldaptor X-Mailer: reportbug 2.21 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 08:56:04 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: zope-ldap Version: 1.1.0-2 Severity: normal Tags: sid Hello, the package lists python-ldap in its dependencies, but python-ldap does not seem to exist anymore. Instead, there are -ldaptor packages which suggest that zope-ldap should probably be ported to use one of these. Otherwise, when doing a dist-upgrade, zope-ldap would get uninstalled and thus likely break any Zope applications that use them. Best, --Toni++ -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux spruce 2.4.21-4-686-smp #1 SMP Sun Aug 3 00:31:17 EST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages zope-ldap depends on: ii python-ldap 1.9.999.pre13-1 A LDAP interface module for Python ii zope 2.6.1-10An Open Source Web Application Ser -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 205682-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 10:09:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 03:09:58 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEOmc-0001Vs-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 03:09:58 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8BA9XhA028866 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:09:33 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8BA9brv022276 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:09:37 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8BA9bV0022274 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:09:37 +0200 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:09:37 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: zope-ldap: uninstallable due to transition python-ldap -> pythonN.M-ldaptor Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hi, Sorry no one got back to you sooner, zope-ldap currently doesn't have a maintainer. On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 08:56:04AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > Hello, > > the package lists python-ldap in its dependencies, but python-ldap does > not seem to exist anymore. Instead, there are -ldaptor > packages which suggest that zope-ldap should probably be ported to use > one of these. Otherwise, when doing a dist-upgrade, zope-ldap would get > uninstalled and thus likely break any Zope applications that use them. There must have been some screwup in your Packages file. python-ldap is alive and well, and no transition is necessary. Thanks,
Bug#189454: marked as forwarded (mgm: Allow a user-created module directory)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:40:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #189454,
regarding mgm: Allow a user-created module directory
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---
Received: (at 189454-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 10:40:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 03:40:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEPGc-0004k1-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 03:40:58 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8BAeqrc001304;
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:40:52 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8BAev66022511;
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:40:57 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8BAevfv022509;
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:40:57 +0200
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:40:57 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#189454: mgm: Allow a user-created module directory
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
We've received the following feature request for the mgm Debian package:
Stephen Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: mgm
> Version: 1.1.cvs.20020221-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Currently mgm only looks for modules in /usr/share/mgm/modules/.
> It could be beneficial to allow a user to create a ${HOME}/.mgm
> directory and build new modules in there. I am including a simple
> patch to do this, in case anyone else is interested.
~/.mgm/ also makes sense since the home directory might be
NFS-mounted on several different machines.
(Please keep the Cc so that our Bug Tracking System records your reply.)
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327153: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#327153: dosemu: fails to start]]
- Forwarded message from Stas Sergeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - The quick fix was to switch to FreeCOM from comcom IIRC. - End forwarded message - This is from upstream. I haven't used that version in a long time and there is a new version due to be uploaded sometime, but it is worth a try to see if you can get around the problem for now. -- Ryan Underwood, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#113871: marked as done (Error while loading: SetWarningHandler is undefined)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#113871: fixed in findimagedupes 0.1.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2001 13:10:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 29 08:10:41 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from muenster.westfalen.de [62.153.201.130] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15nJtA-0006nC-00; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 08:10:40 -0500 Received: from uucp by muenster.westfalen.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15nJt3-0007ee-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 15:10:33 +0200 Received: from murphy.bofh.ms [10.0.0.123] by goggle.westfalen.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15nJZ0-0006ME-00 (Debian); Sat, 29 Sep 2001 14:49:50 +0200 Received: from gb by murphy.bofh.ms with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15nJZ0-0001gG-00; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 14:49:50 +0200 From: Georg Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Error while loading: SetWarningHandler is undefined X-Reportbug-Version: 1.28 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.28 Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 14:49:50 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-maybe-spamdomain: no X-maybe-spammer: no Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: findimagedupes Version: 0.1.3-4 Severity: normal When loading the tool I get the following error: /usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.so: undefined symbol: SetWarningHandler -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux murphy 2.4.8-powerpc #1 Tue Aug 14 13:04:32 PDT 2001 ppc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages findimagedupes depends on: ii imagemagick 4:5.3.8.1-1 Image manipulation programs. ii perl-5.6-base6.2 Transitional package. ii perlmagick 4:5.3.8.1-1 A perl interface to the libMagick --- Received: (at 113871-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 18:50:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 11:50:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEWr4-00040t-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700 From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#113871: fixed in findimagedupes 0.1.3-6 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: findimagedupes Source-Version: 0.1.3-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of findimagedupes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: findimagedupes_0.1.3-6.diff.gz to pool/main/f/findimagedupes/findimagedupes_0.1.3-6.diff.gz findimagedupes_0.1.3-6.dsc to pool/main/f/findimagedupes/findimagedupes_0.1.3-6.dsc findimagedupes_0.1.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/f/findimagedupes/findimagedupes_0.1.3-6_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated findimagedupes package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:22:51 +0200 Source: findimagedupes Binary: findimagedupes Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.3-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: findimagedupes - Finds visually similar or duplicate images Closes: 86994 87013 113871 218699 Changes: findimagedupes (0.1.3-6) unstable; urgency=low . * New maint
Bug#86994: marked as done (findimagedupes: imagemagick code can segfault)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#86994: fixed in findimagedupes 0.1.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2001 12:09:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 22 06:09:54 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newton.newton.cam.ac.uk [:::131.111.145.1]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14VuZG-0002eQ-00; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 06:09:54 -0600
Received: from stone.newton.cam.ac.uk (stone.newton.cam.ac.uk [131.111.145.119])
by newton.newton.cam.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA04130
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:09:52 GMT
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by stone.newton.cam.ac.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2/Debian 8.11.2-1) id
f1MC9qc05836;
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:09:52 GMT
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:09:52 GMT
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jonathan H N Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: findimagedupes: imagemagick code can segfault
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: findimagedupes
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: important
As the code itself notes, certain file types can cause the imagemagick
routines to crash. One possible way to work around this is:
diff -Bbur old/findimagedupes new/findimagedupes
--- old/findimagedupes Thu Feb 22 12:07:34 2001
+++ new/findimagedupes Thu Feb 22 12:05:06 2001
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
my $prog = $0 . '';
$prog = substr($prog,rindex($prog,'/') + 1) if rindex($prog,'/') >= 0;
+sub handleSEGV { die "caught segfault in getfingerprint()\n"; };
+
# check args
while ($arg = shift) {
@@ -227,7 +229,7 @@
}
print IMGFP "\n";
} elsif (!defined($img)) {
- warn "warning: unable to get fingerprint of $file.\n";
+ warn "warning: unable to get fingerprint of $file\n";
}
}
@@ -246,8 +248,10 @@
$image = Image::Magick->new;
-$fp1 = getfingerprint($image, $OPT{'file1'});
-$fp2 = getfingerprint($image, $OPT{'file2'});
+$fp1 = getfingerprint($image, $OPT{'file1'})
+ or die "fatal: unable to get fingerprint of $OPT{'file1'}\n";
+$fp2 = getfingerprint($image, $OPT{'file2'})
+ or die "fatal: unable to get fingerprint of $OPT{'file2'}\n";
# xor the two binary strings to find differences
$fpdiff = $fp1 ^ $fp2;
@@ -498,6 +502,8 @@
my $file = shift;
my (@blobs, $img);
+$SIG{SEGV} = \&handleSEGV;
+my $result = eval {
$image->Read($file);
$#$image = 0;
$image->Sample("160x160!");
@@ -516,10 +522,12 @@
# so we'll discard all but the first 32 bytes
$img = substr($blobs[0],0,32);
}
+};
+$SIG{SEGV} = 'DEFAULT';
# free image but don't delete object.
undef @$image;
-$img;
+(defined $result) ? $img: undef;
}
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux stone 2.2.16int4+usb3 #1 SMP Thu Jul 27 17:18:16 BST 2000
i686 unknown
Versions of the packages findimagedupes depends on:
hi imagemagick5.2.9-1Image manipulation programs.
hi perl-5.6-base 6 Transitional package.
hi perlmagick 5.29-4 A perl interface to the libMagick graphics r
---
Received: (at 86994-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 18:50:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 11:50:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEWr4-00040x-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700
From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#86994: fixed in findimagedupes 0.1.3-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: findimagedupes
Source-Version: 0.1.3-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
findimagedupes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
findimagedupes_0.1.3-6.diff.
Bug#87013: marked as done (findimagedupes: extension to -v)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#87013: fixed in findimagedupes 0.1.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2001 14:04:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 22 08:04:12 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newton.newton.cam.ac.uk [:::131.111.145.1]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14VwLr-0003yx-00; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:04:11 -0600
Received: from stone.newton.cam.ac.uk (stone.newton.cam.ac.uk [131.111.145.119])
by newton.newton.cam.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA05058
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:04:07 GMT
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by stone.newton.cam.ac.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2/Debian 8.11.2-1) id
f1ME47707414;
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:04:07 GMT
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:04:07 GMT
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jonathan H N Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: findimagedupes: extension to -v
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: findimagedupes
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: wishlist
The -v option is rather limited.
Assuming one has found duplicate pairs: (a,b), (a,c)
then if one views (a,b) and deletes a, when one comes to
view (a,c) there will be the problem that a no longer exists.
If one assumes: (a==b) && (a==c) => (b==c)
(which will be more or less true (the matching is fuzzy to start
with)) then one may merge pairs.
eg. (a,b), (a,c), (d,e), (e,f) -> (a,b,c), (d,e,f)
I wrote a script that does this. My perl knowledge is limited but
with a little cleaning up the script may be of some interest to
others and so I include it here. Use by something like:
findimagedupes -g ... | grep '^Dupes:' | grpdup | sh
It will break if, for example, filenames contain shell magic.
diff -BburN old/grpdup new/grpdup
--- old/grpdup Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
+++ new/grpdup Thu Feb 22 12:26:38 2001
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+#!/usr/bin/perl -w
+
+while (<>) {
+ ($a, $b) = (split /::/)[1,2];
+ if (defined $a and defined $b) {
+ if (!defined($ptr{$a}) and !defined($ptr{$b})) {
+ $ptr{$a} = $a;
+ push @{$val{$a}}, $a, $b;
+ $ptr{$b} = $a;
+ $#{$val{$b}} = 0;
+ }
+ elsif (defined($ptr{$a}) and !defined($ptr{$b})) {
+ push @{$val{$ptr{$a}}}, $b;
+ $ptr{$b} = $ptr{$a};
+ $#{$val{$b}} = 0;
+ }
+ elsif (!defined($ptr{$a}) and defined($ptr{$b})) {
+ $ptr{$a} = $ptr{$b};
+ $#{$val{$a}} = 0;
+ push @{$val{$ptr{$b}}}, $a;
+ }
+ elsif ($ptr{$a} ne $ptr{$b}) {
+ push @{$val{$ptr{$a}}}, @{$val{$ptr{$b}}};
+ $ptr{$b} = $ptr{$a};
+ $#{$val{$ptr{$b}}} = 0;
+ # else $val{$a} is $val{$b} already
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+foreach $k (keys %ptr) {
+ if ($ptr{$k} eq $k) {
+ print "xv \"", join("\" \"", @{$val{$ptr{$k}}}), "\"\n";
+ }
+}
+
+exit 0;
+
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux stone 2.2.16int4+usb3 #1 SMP Thu Jul 27 17:18:16 BST 2000
i686 unknown
Versions of the packages findimagedupes depends on:
hi imagemagick5.2.9-1Image manipulation programs.
hi perl-5.6-base 6 Transitional package.
hi perlmagick 5.29-4 A perl interface to the libMagick graphics r
---
Received: (at 87013-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 18:50:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 11:50:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEWr4-00040z-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700
From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#87013: fixed in findimagedupes 0.1.3-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:47:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, h
Bug#168404: marked as done (pdfscreen: Wishlist - bunch of suggestions)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line pdfscreen removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2002 06:33:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 09 00:33:16 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from infofin.com [209.61.158.139] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18APB9-0001AL-00; Sat, 09 Nov 2002 00:33:11 -0600 Received: (qmail 3438 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2002 06:33:10 - Received: from unknown (HELO sanna.igidr.ac.in) (202.149.212.34) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2002 06:33:10 - Received: from ajayshah by sanna.igidr.ac.in with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 189oKI-EX-00; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 20:42:10 +0530 Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:42:10 +0530 From: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: pdfscreen: Wishlist - bunch of suggestions Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 Organisation: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi Sender: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: pdfscreen Version: 1.5-5 Severity: wishlist I think its default fonts are too small, even with the stretching it seems like most of the slide looks empty. I don't like slides with much more content, but I think these fonts look too thin/small. (I may be wrong, I'm just looking at them on screen, but I like the look of seminar slides better). The other thing (do you know how to do this?) is I really want a slide footer/page number, and I don't know how to do this. And it has no nice defaults for colours/bullets/fonts, so I have to struggel with aesthetics which I am hopeless at. :( I suppose if I once come up with something nice, I can continue using it, but this first time is really painful. The other thing is that the config is spread across too many file (maybe because I don't know how to do it right, but still) -- there's stuff in pdfscreen.cfg, my mysetup.tex, and in the actual tex file (where the overlay is selected). It all seems most awfully cluttered. It'd be good to consolidate all this into one place. -ans. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux sanna 2.4.17 #2 Sun Feb 10 18:45:12 IST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages pdfscreen depends on: ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-8 teTeX binary files -- Ajay Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Consultant, http://www.mayin.org/~ajayshah Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi --- Received: (at 168404-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 19:40:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 12:40:23 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEXgd-0001XU-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:40:23 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8BJdtd1023244; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:39:55 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8BJe1t4002211; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:40:01 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8BJWpbp002131; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pdfscreen removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.
Bug#118322: marked as done ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why not put this (after cleaning up) into /usr/doc/pdfscreen])
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line pdfscreen removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2001 06:09:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 05 00:09:39 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from letters.cs.ucsb.edu [128.111.41.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 160cx0-0003Jc-00; Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:09:39 -0600 Received: from coltrane.cs.ucsb.edu (coltrane [128.111.49.131]) by letters.cs.ucsb.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id fA569Yl09862; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 22:09:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by coltrane.cs.ucsb.edu (8.10.2+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id fA569Yd21980 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 22:09:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 22:09:34 -0800 From: Viral Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why not put this (after cleaning up) into /usr/doc/pdfscreen] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: pdfscreen Version: 1.5 Priority: wishlist Add documentation for using overlays.. Filing as a wishlist bug for the time being.. viral -- http://www.mayin.org/~gandalf I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon. --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from linux20040.dn.net ([128.121.247.118]) by letters.cs.ucsb.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id fA560ul09546 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 22:00:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 31594 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2001 16:29:16 - Received: from unknown (HELO sanna.igidr.ac.in) (164.100.15.100) by 128.121.253.118 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2001 16:29:16 - Received: from ajayshah by sanna.igidr.ac.in with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 160cns-Uw-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:30:12 +0530 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:30:11 +0530 To: Viral Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Why not put this (after cleaning up) into /usr/doc/pdfscreen Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HuXIgs6JvY9hJs5C" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Organisation: DEA, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi From: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --HuXIgs6JvY9hJs5C Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="cW+P/jduATWpL925" Content-Disposition: inline --cW+P/jduATWpL925 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But you'll have to work to clean it up and organise it. -ans. --=20 ---= Ajay Shah[EMAIL PROTECTED] .org Consultant, URL http://www.mayin.org/~ajay= shah Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi <*(:-? - wizard who doesn't know the an= swer --cW+P/jduATWpL925 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mayin.org [128.121.253.118] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.3) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sun, 04 Nov 2001 19:10:01 +0530 (IST) Received: (qmail 27608 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2001 03:18:02 - Received: from gatekeeper.igidr.ac.in ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by 128.121.253.118 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2001 03:18:02 - Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by gatekeeper.igidr.ac.in (8.9.2/8.8.3) id IAA15579 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 08:58:02 +0530 (+05:30) Received: from brahma.igidr.ac.in(192.9.10.150) via SMTP by gatekeeper.igidr.ac.in, id smtpda15577; Sat Nov 3 08:57:53 2001 Received: from gatekeeper.igidr.ac.in by brahma.igidr.ac.in (8.9.3/1.1.29.3/05Oct01-0816PM) id JAA403479; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 09:00:23 +0530 (IST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by gatekeeper.igidr.ac.in (8.9.2/8.8.3) id IAA15572 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 08:57:41 +0530 (+05:30) Received: from UNKNOWN(202.88.232.42), claiming to be "mail.gnu.org.in"
Bug#107056: marked as done (Feature request - printing out slides)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line pdfscreen removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2001 04:10:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 29 23:10:54 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gatekeeper.igidr.ac.in [:::202.54.18.155] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15R4OL-sa-00; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:10:54 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by gatekeeper.igidr.ac.in (8.9.2/8.8.3) id JAA16055 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:39:12 +0530 (+05:30) Received: from UNKNOWN(192.9.10.78), claiming to be "sanna.igidr.ac.in" via SMTP by gatekeeper.igidr.ac.in, id smtpda16053; Mon Jul 30 09:39:02 2001 Received: from ajayshah by sanna.igidr.ac.in with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15R4Il-00041f-00; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:35:07 +0530 Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:35:07 +0530 From: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Feature request - printing out slides Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.21 Organisation: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Bombay Sender: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: pdfscreen Version: 1.5-4 Severity: wishlist When I have a pdfscreen show I should have a method for printing it out. CVR knows how to do this. It should be part of the documentation. -ans. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux sanna 2.2.18 #1 Sat Apr 21 13:24:16 IST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC Versions of packages pdfscreen depends on: ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20001218-4 teTeX binary files= =20 --=20 ---= Ajay Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] c.in Associate Professor, IGIDR URL http://www.igidr.ac.in/~ajay= shah <*(:-? - wizard who doesn't know the answer. --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7ZNzzSttXBLG4LuERAsLKAJ9a9l7h4w6e8MqlyIOJipjMOQCfRNQ4 4aH9YPnUaPSbyZJ1wt+ssjo= =iclG -END PGP SIGNATURE- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- --- Received: (at 107056-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 19:40:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 12:40:23 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEXgd-0001XU-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:40:23 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8BJdtd1023244; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:39:55 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8BJe1t4002211; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:40:01 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8BJWpbp002131; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pdfscreen removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 pdfscreen has been removed from Debian after being orphaned for close to two years. Please s
Bug#198927: marked as done (pdfscreen: old version of truncate.sty)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pdfscreen removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2003 16:40:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 11:40:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19VZnJ-00079H-00; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 11:40:21 -0500
Received: from miwie.in-berlin.de (pD9E7E9A4.dip.t-dialin.net [217.231.233.164])
(authenticated bits=0)
by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-1) with ESMTP id
h5QGeI5A015063
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:40:19 +0200
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mw by miwie.in-berlin.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19VZpw-00016H-00; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:43:04 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pdfscreen: old version of truncate.sty
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:43:04 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: pdfscreen
Version: 1.5-5
Severity: wishlist
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux miwie 2.4.20-k6 #1 Mon Jan 13 23:49:14 EST 2003 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages pdfscreen depends on:
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-1teTeX binary files
On CTAN the actual version of 'truncate.sty' is V3.6,
included in 'pdfscreen' is V3.5. This should be updated
('truncate.sty' is not part of the upstream tarball anyway).
---
Received: (at 198927-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 19:40:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 12:40:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEXgd-0001XU-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:40:23 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8BJdtd1023244;
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:39:55 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8BJe1t4002211;
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:40:01 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8BJWpbp002131;
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:32:51 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pdfscreen removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
pdfscreen has been removed from Debian after being orphaned for close to
two years. Please see for details.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of rioutil_1.4.4-2_i386.changes
rioutil_1.4.4-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rioutil_1.4.4-2.dsc rioutil_1.4.4-2.diff.gz rioutil_1.4.4-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rioutil_1.4.4-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: rioutil_1.4.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rioutil/rioutil_1.4.4-2.diff.gz rioutil_1.4.4-2.dsc to pool/main/r/rioutil/rioutil_1.4.4-2.dsc rioutil_1.4.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rioutil/rioutil_1.4.4-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 327313 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2_i386.changes
mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2.dsc mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2.diff.gz mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mozilla-locale-it/mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2.diff.gz mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2.dsc to pool/main/m/mozilla-locale-it/mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2.dsc mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-locale-it/mozilla-locale-it_1.7.5-2_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of vbpp_1.1.0-5_i386.changes
vbpp_1.1.0-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: vbpp_1.1.0-5.dsc vbpp_1.1.0-5.diff.gz vbpp_1.1.0-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#220717: FW: hey there! Mcneill
Hiii 50806-done, 96 Looking0 for la mate in your area? http://www.whitewitness.com/extra/lovegirls3/ A number/esn is fiberglass kcopy but earth_shattering what elaqf, dentals not im/xsi.
When kosuge beneplacito, rgbl fargis is not aholt inosa_devisa but a kidforum fauvel tiggers arises vaidyaraman nitrate in hp_desk, jllawyer and hamburgler. Would you kinseytsrs?
No, monodactylous reverberated kintoen is yc a leapd and take me off367 http://www.whitewitness.com/extra/lovegirls2/getmeoff.php cliking aliasfile. for harbison, retch, then quotatio malposed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vbpp_1.1.0-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: vbpp_1.1.0-5.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vbpp/vbpp_1.1.0-5.diff.gz vbpp_1.1.0-5.dsc to pool/main/v/vbpp/vbpp_1.1.0-5.dsc vbpp_1.1.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vbpp/vbpp_1.1.0-5_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
