Bug#317863: marked as done (Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317863: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 03:25:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 11 20:25:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DsBOg-0004vk-00; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:25:26 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6C3PPQC073152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:25:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ds6fE-0002It-52 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:22:12 -0700 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:22:12 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: texi2html Version: 1.76-1 Severity: serious bbdb fails to build because texi2html loops forever on bbdb.texinfo: > cd texinfo && /usr/bin/texi2html -split=3Dchapter bbdb.texinfo It loops forever on lines 10606 to 10613, trying to set the following field for the "Other database manipulation functions" subsection. Changing the loop test to use $up ne $element_top instead of $up->{'up'} fixes the problem, but I'm not sure that there isn't a better way. --=20 Matt --muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC0vETfNdgYxVXvBARAi7GAJ9uAukqIqEYDg5+aov9reXTIUysEwCfWN/9 TjM5mDJBMxILKXfLXsvUsyc= =Ip7R -END PGP SIGNATURE- --muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ-- --- Received: (at 317863-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:29 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBsjI-0002kQ-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#317863: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: texi2html Source-Version: 1.76-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz texi2html_1.76-2.dsc to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Bug#326048: marked as done (gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 13:09:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 06:09:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c129237.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.237] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EAooR-0006PU-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:09:03 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EAooP-0001W4-Ta; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756. Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnugo Version: 3.7.4-1 Severity: serious When building 'gnugo' on unstable, I get the following error: # including ./regression.texi # including ./copying.texi # end of pass texi # end of pass structure # Writing elements: # Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top] # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html .. # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html .. # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756. make: *** [build] Error 25 Regards Andreas Jochens --- Received: (at 318536-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBsjI-0002kS-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: texi2html Source-Version: 1.76-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz texi2html_1.76-2.dsc to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated texi2html package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 22:37:39 +1200 Source: texi2html Binary: texi2html Architecture: source all Version: 1.76-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: texi2html - Convert Texinfo files to HTML Closes: 314843 317863 318536 321586 326048 Changes: texi2html (1.76-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Closes: #318536: Chokes on gnugo.texi * Closes: #317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo * Closes: #321586: Includes non-free images - Fixed by dual GPL/CC agreement * New maintainer. (Closes: #314843: ITA: texi2html -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML) * Closes: #326048: gnugo: FTBFS: U
Bug#318536: marked as done (texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 03:14:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 20:14:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Dtd7t-0004bp-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:05 -0700 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1Dtd7s-00015u-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:14:04 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Dtd7q-0007Yg-A6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:03 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:13:55 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: texi2html Version: 1.76-1 Severity: serious Justification: causes gnugo package to FTBFS >From my gnugo build log: ... cd doc && texi2html -split_chapter -Verbose gnugo.texi # Expanded: verbatim ifnotinfo ifnotxml documentdescription ifnotplaintext html ifnotdocbook titlepage ifset menu copying ifnottex ifclear ifhtml # created directory gnugo # putting result files into directory gnugo/ # reading from gnugo.texi # using 'en' as document language # including ./introduction.texi # including ./install.texi # including ./using.texi # including ./overview.texi # including ./analyze.texi # including ./move_generation.texi # including ./dragon.texi # including ./eyes.texi # including ./patterns.texi # including ./dfa.texi # including ./reading.texi # including ./owl.texi # including ./influence.texi # including ./moyo.texi # including ./board.texi # including ./sgf.texi # including ./api.texi # including ./utils.texi # including ./gtp.texi # including ./gtp-commands.texi # including ./regression.texi # including ./copying.texi # end of pass texi # end of pass structure # Writing elements: # Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top] # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html .. # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html .. # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756. make: *** [build] Error 25 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages texi2html depends on: ii perl 5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction texi2html recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 318536-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBsjI-0002kS-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: texi2html Source-Version: 1.76-2 We
Bug#321586: marked as done (texi2html: Includes non-free image)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321586: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 11:22:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 04:22:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E1Ml4-0007Kk-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:22:30 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so337958wri for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=GIuqTrL2g3jCgdoQenOAtWpC49pVZtOYdXB27rsB1+egl3jtv5ggRAH0dvW0xhSoexopwo55+3yEgS03eqX9sPQF3NctBvF+Kz2tvLYf8q8lmdal0lAl8FalmF8lUGTfdhB/3zAIGQtQiZptwAdAG29ZoNG0+v/Vjn23hu3ge5Q= Received: by 10.54.54.39 with SMTP id c39mr3385229wra; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.49.56 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 23:21:59 +1200 From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: texi2html: Includes non-free image Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Subject: texi2html: Includes non-free images Package: texi2html Version: 1.76-2 Severity: serious Justification: CC Images are not compatible with DFSG >From my report at https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=3Ddetailitem&item_id=3D1405= 2 Is it possible for the images in texi2html to be replaced from CC-Attr-Sharealike to a more compatible license that Debian will accept. As the matter stands it seems you are actually claiming GPL'ed images to be CC'ed, hence meaning we can't keep texi2html in the mainstream debian which would mean a complete break down in quite a few of the packages. The singular project which you got the images from claims it's all GPL, which means that the images in texi2html is too. As it stands, this problem is blocking the update of texi2html on Debian which fixes 2 RC bugs (which are actually still unreplied to here). To fix this we could split texi2html and have a -data package in non-free (and the main package in contrib). But this would mean 92 packages directly affected, and thousands more indirectly (glibc build-deps on texi2html). Will await upstream response for decision however. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3 Locale: LANG=3Den_NZ, LC_CTYPE=3Den_NZ (charmap=3DISO-8859-1) Versions of packages texi2html depends on: ii perl 5.8.7-3Larry Wall's Practical Extract= ion texi2html recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 321586-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBsjI-0002kU-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#321586: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: texi2html Source-Version: 1.76-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of texi2html, which is due to be instal
Bug#326048: marked as done (gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 13:09:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 06:09:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c129237.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.237] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EAooR-0006PU-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:09:03 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EAooP-0001W4-Ta; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756. Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnugo Version: 3.7.4-1 Severity: serious When building 'gnugo' on unstable, I get the following error: # including ./regression.texi # including ./copying.texi # end of pass texi # end of pass structure # Writing elements: # Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top] # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html .. # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html .. # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756. make: *** [build] Error 25 Regards Andreas Jochens --- Received: (at 326048-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBsjI-0002kW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: texi2html Source-Version: 1.76-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz texi2html_1.76-2.dsc to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated texi2html package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 22:37:39 +1200 Source: texi2html Binary: texi2html Architecture: source all Version: 1.76-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: texi2html - Convert Texinfo files to HTML Closes: 314843 317863 318536 321586 326048 Changes: texi2html (1.76-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Closes: #318536: Chokes on gnugo.texi * Closes: #317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo * Closes: #321586: Includes non-free images - Fixed by dual GPL/CC agreement * New maintainer. (Closes: #314843: ITA: texi2html -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML) * Closes: #326048: gnugo: FTBFS: U
Bug#318536: marked as done (texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 03:14:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 20:14:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Dtd7t-0004bp-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:05 -0700 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1Dtd7s-00015u-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:14:04 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Dtd7q-0007Yg-A6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:03 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:13:55 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: texi2html Version: 1.76-1 Severity: serious Justification: causes gnugo package to FTBFS >From my gnugo build log: ... cd doc && texi2html -split_chapter -Verbose gnugo.texi # Expanded: verbatim ifnotinfo ifnotxml documentdescription ifnotplaintext html ifnotdocbook titlepage ifset menu copying ifnottex ifclear ifhtml # created directory gnugo # putting result files into directory gnugo/ # reading from gnugo.texi # using 'en' as document language # including ./introduction.texi # including ./install.texi # including ./using.texi # including ./overview.texi # including ./analyze.texi # including ./move_generation.texi # including ./dragon.texi # including ./eyes.texi # including ./patterns.texi # including ./dfa.texi # including ./reading.texi # including ./owl.texi # including ./influence.texi # including ./moyo.texi # including ./board.texi # including ./sgf.texi # including ./api.texi # including ./utils.texi # including ./gtp.texi # including ./gtp-commands.texi # including ./regression.texi # including ./copying.texi # end of pass texi # end of pass structure # Writing elements: # Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top] # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html .. # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html .. # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html # Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756. make: *** [build] Error 25 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages texi2html depends on: ii perl 5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction texi2html recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 326048-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBsjI-0002kW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: texi2html Source-Version: 1.76-2 We
Processing of xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.changes
xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 318285 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318285: marked as done (CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318285: fixed in xpvm 1.2.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 14:26:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 07:26:51 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dt4fq-0003MT-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:26:51 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (kitenet.net [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F4217DD1 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:26:50 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38F306E134; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:27:33 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:27:33 +0300 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: xpvm Severity: serious Tags: security According to http://secunia.com/advisories/16040: Eric Romang has reported a vulnerability in xpvm, which can be exploited = by malicious, local users to perform certain actions on a vulnerable system = with escalated privileges. The vulnerability is caused due to the temporary file "/tmp/xpvm.trace.$u= ser" being created insecurely by "src/xpvm.tcl". This can be exploited via sym= link attacks to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the= user running the affected application. This is CAN-2005-2240. --=20 see shy jo --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC1nZVd8HHehbQuO8RAhk+AKC0cRmtdAkkp8x10Nt4zqTi1M49sQCgiP57 cxquqi0Uu12YUEbwq02YKwo= =EjuF -END PGP SIGNATURE- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- --- Received: (at 318285-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 13:18:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 06:18:50 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBuMv-0007rF-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#318285: fixed in xpvm 1.2.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xpvm Source-Version: 1.2.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xpvm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xpvm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe
Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
tag 318285 patch thanks Hi, Here's the CAN-2005-2240 fix for woody and sarge (sid upload is already in incoming). Cheers, Matej diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl --- xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl +++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ set tfck [ info exists trace_file ] -if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file "/tmp/xpvm.trace.$user" } +if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file [ file join [ glob ~ ] ".xpvm_trace" ] } $CTRL.file_entry insert 0 $trace_file diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog --- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog +++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +xpvm (1.2.5-7.2woody1) oldstable-security; urgency=high + + * QA upload. + * Use ~/.xpvm_trace instead of /tmp/xpvm.trace.$USER to prevent symlink +attacks. (Trace files are meant to be semi-persistent, so this is more +in line with user expectations than creating unique temporary files.) +[src/xpvm.tcl, src/help/traces.help, debian/xpvm.1, CAN-2005-2240] +Closes: #318285. + + -- Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:44:07 +0200 + xpvm (1.2.5-7.2) unstable; urgency=low * NMU diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 --- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 +++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ .BI \-T\ trace .B xpvm will normally create and store a trace file in the -.I /tmp +user's home directory. To have the .I trace file stored in some other location, use this option. only in patch2: unchanged: --- xpvm-1.2.5.orig/src/help/traces.help +++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/help/traces.help @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ { to have a valid, writable trace file to work with, and so XPVM } { assumes a default trace file name: } {} -{ /tmp/xpvm.trace.$(USER) } +{ ~/.xpvm_trace } {} { On the first execution of XPVM, this trace file will not yet exist, } { and so XPVM will proceed to write traces into this file and read } diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl --- xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl +++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ set tfck [ info exists trace_file ] -if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file "/tmp/xpvm.trace.$user" } +if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file [ file join [ glob ~ ] ".xpvm_trace" ] } $CTRL.file_entry insert 0 $trace_file diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog --- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog +++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +xpvm (1.2.5-7.3sarge1) stable-security; urgency=high + + * QA upload. + * Use ~/.xpvm_trace instead of /tmp/xpvm.trace.$USER to prevent symlink +attacks. (Trace files are meant to be semi-persistent, so this is more +in line with user expectations than creating unique temporary files.) +[src/xpvm.tcl, src/help/traces.help, debian/xpvm.1, CAN-2005-2240] +Closes: #318285. + + -- Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:44:07 +0200 + xpvm (1.2.5-7.3) unstable; urgency=low * Uploading with maintainer set to QA Group diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 --- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 +++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ .BI \-T\ trace .B xpvm will normally create and store a trace file in the -.I /tmp +user's home directory. To have the .I trace file stored in some other location, use this option. only in patch2: unchanged: --- xpvm-1.2.5.orig/src/help/traces.help +++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/help/traces.help @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ { to have a valid, writable trace file to work with, and so XPVM } { assumes a default trace file name: } {} -{ /tmp/xpvm.trace.$(USER) } +{ ~/.xpvm_trace } {} { On the first execution of XPVM, this trace file will not yet exist, } { and so XPVM will proceed to write traces into this file and read }
Processed: Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 318285 patch Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Tags were: security Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#197691: marked as done (make /var/state/kernellab writeable by group src)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:04 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19S1Eq-00068Y-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 4469 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:02 - Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42) by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:02 - Received: (qmail 755 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:29 - Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123) by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:29 - Received: (nullmailer pid 3284 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:53:56 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: make /var/state/kernellab writeable by group src Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:53:56 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: normal this makes fakeroot kernellab as a user in the src group possible -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.7.3 Gives a fake root environment ii kernel-package8.040 A utility for building Linux kerne ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 197691-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream and doesn't work with current kernels. (See Bug#264219.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#197690: marked as done (kernellab should also keep track of gcc version)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:06 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19S1Es-000695-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:06 -0500 Received: (qmail 4496 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:04 - Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42) by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:04 - Received: (qmail 703 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:28 - Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123) by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:28 - Received: (nullmailer pid 3254 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:49:13 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kernellab should also keep track of gcc version Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:49:13 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: wishlist it would be particularly useful if kernellab could additionally keep track of the gcc version used for kernel compilation, i.e. option --gcc=gcc2.95 or --gcc=gcc3.2 etc... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.7.3 Gives a fake root environment ii kernel-package8.040 A utility for building Linux kerne ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 197690-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream and doesn't work with current kernels. (See Bug#264219.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#197688: marked as done (allow for more generic patches)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:04 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19S1Eq-00068W-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 4465 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:01 - Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42) by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:01 - Received: (qmail 735 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:29 - Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123) by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:29 - Received: (nullmailer pid 3269 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:52:16 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: allow for more generic patches Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:52:16 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: wishlist I would suggest using a single directory for patches to be applied, e.g. /var/state/kernellab/patches, where patches are of the form: /var/state/kernellab/patches/patch-n.n.n-ac42.bz2 /var/state/kernellab/patches/patch-n.n.n-benh23.bz2 and are appled in alphabetical order. Patches might start with - (e.g. 01-patch-2.4.21-benh7.bz2) All these suffixes should be appended, e.g. into config/kernel -> config-2.4.21-ac23-ben7 / 2.4.21-ac23-ben7 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.7.3 Gives a fake root environment ii kernel-package8.040 A utility for building Linux kerne ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 197688-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream and doesn't work with current kernels. (See Bug#264219.) --
Bug#176200: marked as done (kernellab: kernellab doesn't work if kernel archive extracts to linux-x.x.xx/)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2003 00:16:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 10 18:16:58 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ms-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) [134.130.3.130] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18X9Kc-00051I-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:16:58 -0600 Received: from ms-2 (ms-2 [134.130.3.131]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 1 (built Aug 19 2002)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.3.31]) by ms-2 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.0 Beta3) ; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [134.130.180.1]) by r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.12.1/8.11.3/26) with ESMTP id h0B0FSGi027496 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from mcknight.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (mcknight.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.181.112]) by kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA16483 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100 Received: from joe by mcknight.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))id 18X9JA-0004KH-00; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernellab: kernellab doesn't work if kernel archive extracts to linux-x.x.xx/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: important # kernellab -c mcknight kernellab: kernel source didn't unpack in 'linux' kernellab is right, but it should also handle this situation: # tar tfj linux-2.4.20.tar.bz2 | head -10 linux-2.4.20/ linux-2.4.20/Makefile linux-2.4.20/MAINTAINERS linux-2.4.20/CREDITS linux-2.4.20/Rules.make linux-2.4.20/README linux-2.4.20/COPYING linux-2.4.20/fs/ linux-2.4.20/fs/xattr.c linux-2.4.20/fs/super.c Joachim -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux mcknight 2.4.19mcknight #1 SMP Sun Nov 24 14:07:18 CET 2002 i686 unknown Versions of the packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.4.4-9.2 Gives a fake root environment. ii kernel-package 7.107 Debian Linux kernel package build scripts. ii perl 5.6.1-8.2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report ^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5) --- Received: (at 176200-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:27 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 test
Processed: Package changed name
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 224019 python-zsi Bug#224019: python2.3-zsi: Lacks docs Bug reassigned from package `python2.3-zsi' to `python-zsi'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#121201: marked as done (kernellab: doesn't work with debian kernel-source packages)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2001 09:55:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 03:55:15 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from aponcelet-101-2-1-171.abo.wanadoo.fr (zenon.apartia.com) [193.251.42.171] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 168ITr-00069S-00; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 03:55:15 -0600 Received: by zenon.apartia.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BB274772C2; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:55:08 +0100 (CET) From: Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kernellab: doesn't work with debian kernel-source packages X-Reportbug-Version: 1.37 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.37 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:55:08 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: normal kernellab seems a great tool but it doesn't integrate with Debian kernel-source packages: 1) it expects a "linux-X.X.X.tar.bz2" and not the standard debian "kernel-source-2.4.14.tar.bz2" 2) it expects the tarball to extract to linux/ (which the deb doesn't) -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux zenon 2.4.14 #10 Tue Nov 20 10:42:02 CET 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.4.5-2Gives a fake root environment. ii kernel-package7.74 Debian Linux kernel package build ii perl [perl5] 5.6.1-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- Received: (at 121201-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream and doesn't work with current kernels. (See Bug#264219.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#197689: marked as done (wrong output on -h)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:06 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19S1Er-00068c-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:05 -0500 Received: (qmail 4484 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:03 - Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42) by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:03 - Received: (qmail 817 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:30 - Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123) by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:30 - Received: (nullmailer pid 3336 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:57:04 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: wrong output on -h Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:57:04 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: important on -h it gives usage: kernellab [options] [[-ac] [..]] but it should be usage: kernellab [options] [[-ac] [,,...]] -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.7.3 Gives a fake root environment ii kernel-package8.040 A utility for building Linux kerne ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 197689-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream and doesn't work with current kernels. (See Bug#264219.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#197692: marked as done (does fail on mol-modules-source)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:06 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19S1Er-000691-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:06 -0500 Received: (qmail 4488 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:04 - Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42) by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:04 - Received: (qmail 788 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:30 - Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123) by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:30 - Received: (nullmailer pid 3312 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:55:33 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: does fail on mol-modules-source Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:55:33 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: normal I can compile the module using make-kpkg modules but with kernellab I get: dh_builddeb --destdir=/tmp/kernellab.1055516557.23219/linux/.. dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 2 package `drm-trunk-module-2.4.21-rc3-ben0': error in Version string `2003.05.04-1+1:no.20030613.1': epoch in version is not number -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.7.3 Gives a fake root environment ii kernel-package8.040 A utility for building Linux kerne ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 197692-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream and doesn't work with current kernels. (See Bug#264219.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Bug#222751: marked as done (kernellab: Add flavour to extraversion instead of revision)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2003 18:41:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 02 12:41:40 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from math3f.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de (math3f) [129.187.111.48] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ARFSt-0007pJ-00; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:41:39 -0600 Received: by math3f (Postfix, from userid 666) id 4D64A205297; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:41:38 +0100 (CET) From: Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kernellab: Add flavour to extraversion instead of revision X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 19:41:38 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: wishlist Hi, right now, kernel package puts the flavour (or host name) into the package revision. This means that all packages created from, say, linux-2.4.23.tar.bz2 are different version of kernel-image-2.4.23 and cannot be distinguished by the packaging system. It would be nice if kernellab automatically added an extraversion, resulting in packages named kernel-image-2.4.23-router1, kernel-image-2.4.23-router2 and so on. The required change to kernellab is both trivial and small. Regards, Jens. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux math3f 2.4.23-scenic #1 Tue Dec 2 18:51:53 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.4.4-9.2 Gives a fake root environment. ii kernel-package7.107 Debian Linux kernel package build ii perl [perl5] 5.6.1-8.3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- Received: (at 222751-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8 kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream and doesn't work with current kernels. (See Bug#264219.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#81731: marked as done (be able to use dirs)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2001 00:48:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 09 18:48:27 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from paris11-nas10-39-41.dial.proxad.net (jcb.yi.org) [212.27.39.41] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14G9RB-0008Iw-00; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 18:48:26 -0600 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jcb.yi.org (Sendmail 8.11.1) id f0A0n4S01615; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:49:04 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:49:04 +0100 From: Jean Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: be able to use dirs Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.8 X-Location: home Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: reportbug Version: 1.8 Severity: wishlist it would be very nice if kernellab could use directories like the kernel archives ... something like /usr/src/linux-2.2.18 ... ..-2.4.0 ... -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux zeus 2.2.18 #1 Sat Dec 23 13:18:43 CET 2000 i686 Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python-base 1.5.2-11 An interactive object-oriented scr ii python-newt 0.50.8-2 A newt module for Python. ii whiptail 0.50.8-2 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe --- Received: (at 81731-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed from Debian Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10 kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream and doesn't work with current kernels. (See Bug#264219.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#224604: marked as done (kernellab: lacking useful documentation)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2003 15:31:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 20 09:31:46 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from h-68-165-135-69.dnvtco56.covad.net (asgardsrealm.net) [68.165.135.69] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AXiot-0005go-00; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:15:07 -0600 Received: (qmail 28069 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2003 15:15:06 - Received: from unknown (HELO cerberus) (192.168.10.80) by forseti.asgardsrealm.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2003 15:15:06 - Received: from jcollins by cerberus with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AXios-00039v-00; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 08:15:06 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kernellab: lacking useful documentation X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 08:15:06 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernellab Version: 0.2.5 Severity: important Documentation is sorely lacking. There is no indication of how to setup kernellab only a brief reference of: Say someone discovers a denial of service -attack in the linux TCP/IP stack. So you wait two hours till Alan Cox puts out a new -ac42 patch, download this patch and put in to /var/state/kernellab/alancox/patch-n.n.n-ac42.bz2. Now, all you need to do to recompile the new, fixed, kernel for all your routers, is for a in router1 router2 router3 ...; do kernellab "$a"; done Sure, but how does one setup kernellab in the first place? Through reading the config file it is found that the kernel sources are to be stored compressed as gz or bz2 files, but this isn't in the documentation anywhere. Additionally kernellab can't handle Debian kernel sources package names of kernel-source-n.n.n.tar.bz2 (#121201). It also expect the kernel source archive to unpack into a directory called "linux" based on the error message (#176200). Are the configs to be named in any special way? I was not able to find the naming convention to get kernallab to use my existing kernel config. These assumptions/requirements should be documented in the package documentation. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cerberus 2.4.22-ar-k7 #1 Fri Dec 19 14:06:09 MST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kernellab depends on: ii fakeroot 0.8.2 Gives a fake root environment ii kernel-package8.070 A utility for building Linux kerne ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 224604-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
Processing of sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.changes
sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sodipodi_0.34-1.dsc sodipodi_0.34-1.diff.gz sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: sodipodi_0.34-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1.diff.gz sodipodi_0.34-1.dsc to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1.dsc sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 287925 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#202961: marked as done (NMU: diskless 0.3.18.0.1)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:26:13 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line diskless is orphaned has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2003 14:18:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 26 09:18:26 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0201.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.29] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19gPsQ-0004Vs-00; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 09:18:26 -0500 Received: from seb128 (AMetz-102-1-5-132.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.48.174.132]) by mwinf0201.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 21AE830003A9; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 16:18:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from seb128 by seb128 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19gPsO-0002s7-00; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 16:18:24 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0371534711==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: NMU: diskless 0.3.18.0.1 X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 16:18:24 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0371534711== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Package: diskless Version: 0.3.18.0.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch There is the patch of the 0.3.18.0.1 NMU that fix 189569 RC bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux seb128 2.4.21 #4 mar jui 8 01:20:22 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-15 (ignored: LC_ALL set) Versions of packages diskless depends on: ii debootstrap 0.1.17.33 Bootstrap a basic Debian system ii libmd5-perl 2.02-3.1 backwards-compatible wrapper for D ii m41.4-15 a macro processing language ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --===0371534711== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="/home/seb128/nmu-diskless.patch" diff -Nur ../../debian/changelog ./changelog --- ../../debian/changelog 2002-04-30 11:24:18.0 +0200 +++ ./changelog 2003-07-26 15:20:37.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +diskless (0.3.18.0.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU, with maintainer authorisation, to fix an RC bug. + * debian/control +- Changed Build-Depends from docbook-stylesheets to docbook-dsssl + (Closes: #189569). + + -- Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:31:29 +0200 + diskless (0.3.18) unstable; urgency=low * Minor touch ups. diff -Nur ../../debian/control ./control --- ../../debian/control2002-01-23 09:59:04.0 +0100 +++ ./control 2003-07-26 15:21:13.0 +0200 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: extra Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.5.5 -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), jade, docbook-stylesheets, sgml-data, docbook-xml +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), jade, docbook-dsssl, sgml-data, docbook-xml Package: diskless Architecture: all --===0371534711==-- --- Received: (at 202961-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 17:26:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 10:26:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EByGC-000120-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:26:28 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84HPuKc026052 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:25:56 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84HQD69013963 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242938: marked as done (diskless: RFA)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:30:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Already filed as Bug#107808 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2004 19:43:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 09 12:43:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from asp.sccoast.net [66.153.203.150] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BC1uI-MK-00; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:43:18 -0700 Received: from htc.com (htcsweeper.htc.com [172.21.253.101]) by asp.sccoast.net with ESMTP id i39JhGD8005671 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:43:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MAILSERVER.htc.com (unverified) by htc.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:43:15 -0400 Received: from bobcat.htc.com (ts1.htc.com [172.21.1.121]) by MAILSERVER.htc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id H5LFYW9W; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:43:16 -0400 Received: from htc-361-2.htc.com ([172.16.4.161] helo=[127.0.0.1] ident=james) by bobcat.htc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC1uG-00033o-00; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:43:16 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: James Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: diskless: RFA X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56 Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:04:52 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 Package: diskless Version: 0.3.18.0.4 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages diskless depends on: ii debootstrap 0.2.31 Bootstrap a basic Debian system ii libmd5-perl 2.02-3.1 backwards-compatible wrapper for D ii m41.4-17 a macro processing language ii perl [perl5] 5.8.3-3Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information HTC Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. --- Received: (at 242938-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 17:29:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 10:29:58 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EByJZ-0001wX-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:29:57 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84HTpRb026432 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:29:51 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84HU8hq014007 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:30:08 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84HU8cd014005 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:30:08 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:30:08 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Already filed as Bug#107808 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.d
Processing of wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.changes
wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: wmfire_1.2.1-5.dsc wmfire_1.2.1-5.diff.gz wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: wmfire_1.2.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5.diff.gz wmfire_1.2.1-5.dsc to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5.dsc wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 316764 322524 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]