Bug#317863: marked as done (Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317863: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 03:25:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 11 20:25:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DsBOg-0004vk-00; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:25:26 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6C3PPQC073152
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ds6fE-0002It-52
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:22:12 -0700
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:22:12 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: texi2html
Version: 1.76-1
Severity: serious

bbdb fails to build because texi2html loops forever on bbdb.texinfo:

> cd texinfo && /usr/bin/texi2html -split=3Dchapter bbdb.texinfo

It loops forever on lines 10606 to 10613, trying to set the following
field for the "Other database manipulation functions" subsection.
Changing the loop test to use

 $up ne $element_top

instead of

 $up->{'up'}

fixes the problem, but I'm not sure that there isn't a better way.

--=20
Matt

--muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC0vETfNdgYxVXvBARAi7GAJ9uAukqIqEYDg5+aov9reXTIUysEwCfWN/9
TjM5mDJBMxILKXfLXsvUsyc=
=Ip7R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ--

---
Received: (at 317863-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kQ-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#317863: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#326048: marked as done (gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 13:09:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 06:09:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c129237.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.129.237] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAooR-0006PU-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:09:03 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EAooP-0001W4-Ta; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at 
/usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gnugo
Version: 3.7.4-1
Severity: serious

When building 'gnugo' on unstable, I get the following error:

# including ./regression.texi
# including ./copying.texi
# end of pass texi
# end of pass structure
# Writing elements:
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top]
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html 
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine 
&main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
make: *** [build] Error 25

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 318536-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kS-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated texi2html package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 22:37:39 +1200
Source: texi2html
Binary: texi2html
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.76-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 texi2html  - Convert Texinfo files to HTML
Closes: 314843 317863 318536 321586 326048
Changes: 
 texi2html (1.76-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Closes: #318536: Chokes on gnugo.texi
   * Closes: #317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo
   * Closes: #321586: Includes non-free images - Fixed by dual GPL/CC agreement
   * New maintainer. (Closes: #314843: ITA: texi2html -- Convert Texinfo
 files to HTML)
   * Closes: #326048: gnugo: FTBFS: U

Bug#318536: marked as done (texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 03:14:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 20:14:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dtd7t-0004bp-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:05 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
id 1Dtd7s-00015u-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:14:04 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1Dtd7q-0007Yg-A6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:03 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:13:55 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: texi2html
Version: 1.76-1
Severity: serious
Justification: causes gnugo package to FTBFS

>From my gnugo build log:

...
cd doc && texi2html -split_chapter -Verbose gnugo.texi
# Expanded: verbatim ifnotinfo ifnotxml documentdescription ifnotplaintext html 
ifnotdocbook titlepage ifset menu copying ifnottex ifclear ifhtml 
# created directory gnugo
# putting result files into directory gnugo/
# reading from gnugo.texi
# using 'en' as document language
# including ./introduction.texi
# including ./install.texi
# including ./using.texi
# including ./overview.texi
# including ./analyze.texi
# including ./move_generation.texi
# including ./dragon.texi
# including ./eyes.texi
# including ./patterns.texi
# including ./dfa.texi
# including ./reading.texi
# including ./owl.texi
# including ./influence.texi
# including ./moyo.texi
# including ./board.texi
# including ./sgf.texi
# including ./api.texi
# including ./utils.texi
# including ./gtp.texi
# including ./gtp-commands.texi
# including ./regression.texi
# including ./copying.texi
# end of pass texi
# end of pass structure
# Writing elements:
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top]
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html 
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine 
&main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
make: *** [build] Error 25

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages texi2html depends on:
ii  perl  5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

texi2html recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 318536-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kS-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We

Bug#321586: marked as done (texi2html: Includes non-free image)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321586: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 11:22:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 04:22:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1Ml4-0007Kk-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:22:30 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so337958wri
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;

b=GIuqTrL2g3jCgdoQenOAtWpC49pVZtOYdXB27rsB1+egl3jtv5ggRAH0dvW0xhSoexopwo55+3yEgS03eqX9sPQF3NctBvF+Kz2tvLYf8q8lmdal0lAl8FalmF8lUGTfdhB/3zAIGQtQiZptwAdAG29ZoNG0+v/Vjn23hu3ge5Q=
Received: by 10.54.54.39 with SMTP id c39mr3385229wra;
Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.49.56 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 23:21:59 +1200
From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: texi2html: Includes non-free image
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Subject: texi2html: Includes non-free images
Package: texi2html
Version: 1.76-2
Severity: serious
Justification: CC Images are not compatible with DFSG

>From my report at
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=3Ddetailitem&item_id=3D1405=
2


Is it possible for the images in texi2html to be replaced from
CC-Attr-Sharealike to a more compatible license that Debian will accept.

As the matter stands it seems you are actually claiming GPL'ed images to
be CC'ed, hence meaning we can't keep texi2html in the mainstream debian
which would mean a complete break down in quite a few of the packages.
The singular project which you got the images from claims it's all GPL,
which means that the images in texi2html is too.

As it stands, this problem is blocking the update of texi2html on Debian
which fixes 2 RC bugs (which are actually still unreplied to here).



To fix this we could split texi2html and have a -data package in
non-free (and the main package in contrib).  But this would mean 92
packages directly affected, and thousands more indirectly (glibc
build-deps on texi2html).

Will await upstream response for decision however.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=3Den_NZ, LC_CTYPE=3Den_NZ (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages texi2html depends on:
ii  perl  5.8.7-3Larry Wall's Practical Extract=
ion

texi2html recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 321586-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kU-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#321586: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texi2html, which is due to be instal

Bug#326048: marked as done (gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 13:09:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 06:09:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c129237.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.129.237] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAooR-0006PU-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:09:03 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EAooP-0001W4-Ta; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine &main::normalize_space called at 
/usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gnugo
Version: 3.7.4-1
Severity: serious

When building 'gnugo' on unstable, I get the following error:

# including ./regression.texi
# including ./copying.texi
# end of pass texi
# end of pass structure
# Writing elements:
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top]
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html 
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine 
&main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
make: *** [build] Error 25

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 326048-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated texi2html package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 22:37:39 +1200
Source: texi2html
Binary: texi2html
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.76-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 texi2html  - Convert Texinfo files to HTML
Closes: 314843 317863 318536 321586 326048
Changes: 
 texi2html (1.76-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Closes: #318536: Chokes on gnugo.texi
   * Closes: #317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo
   * Closes: #321586: Includes non-free images - Fixed by dual GPL/CC agreement
   * New maintainer. (Closes: #314843: ITA: texi2html -- Convert Texinfo
 files to HTML)
   * Closes: #326048: gnugo: FTBFS: U

Bug#318536: marked as done (texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 03:14:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 20:14:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dtd7t-0004bp-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:05 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
id 1Dtd7s-00015u-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:14:04 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1Dtd7q-0007Yg-A6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:03 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:13:55 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: texi2html
Version: 1.76-1
Severity: serious
Justification: causes gnugo package to FTBFS

>From my gnugo build log:

...
cd doc && texi2html -split_chapter -Verbose gnugo.texi
# Expanded: verbatim ifnotinfo ifnotxml documentdescription ifnotplaintext html 
ifnotdocbook titlepage ifset menu copying ifnottex ifclear ifhtml 
# created directory gnugo
# putting result files into directory gnugo/
# reading from gnugo.texi
# using 'en' as document language
# including ./introduction.texi
# including ./install.texi
# including ./using.texi
# including ./overview.texi
# including ./analyze.texi
# including ./move_generation.texi
# including ./dragon.texi
# including ./eyes.texi
# including ./patterns.texi
# including ./dfa.texi
# including ./reading.texi
# including ./owl.texi
# including ./influence.texi
# including ./moyo.texi
# including ./board.texi
# including ./sgf.texi
# including ./api.texi
# including ./utils.texi
# including ./gtp.texi
# including ./gtp-commands.texi
# including ./regression.texi
# including ./copying.texi
# end of pass texi
# end of pass structure
# Writing elements:
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top]
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html 
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine 
&main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
make: *** [build] Error 25

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages texi2html depends on:
ii  perl  5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

texi2html recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 326048-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We

Processing of xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.changes

2005-09-04 Thread Archive Administrator
xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc
  xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz
  xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz
xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc
xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 318285 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#318285: marked as done (CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318285: fixed in xpvm 1.2.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 14:26:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 07:26:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dt4fq-0003MT-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:26:51 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (kitenet.net [127.0.0.1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F4217DD1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:26:50 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 38F306E134; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:27:33 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:27:33 +0300
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: xpvm
Severity: serious
Tags: security

According to http://secunia.com/advisories/16040:

  Eric Romang has reported a vulnerability in xpvm, which can be exploited =
by
  malicious, local users to perform certain actions on a vulnerable system =
with
  escalated privileges.

  The vulnerability is caused due to the temporary file "/tmp/xpvm.trace.$u=
ser"
  being created insecurely by "src/xpvm.tcl". This can be exploited via sym=
link
  attacks to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the=
 user
  running the affected application.

This is CAN-2005-2240.

--=20
see shy jo

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1nZVd8HHehbQuO8RAhk+AKC0cRmtdAkkp8x10Nt4zqTi1M49sQCgiP57
cxquqi0Uu12YUEbwq02YKwo=
=EjuF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--

---
Received: (at 318285-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 13:18:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 06:18:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBuMv-0007rF-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318285: fixed in xpvm 1.2.5-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xpvm
Source-Version: 1.2.5-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xpvm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz
xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc
xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xpvm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe 

Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl

2005-09-04 Thread Matej Vela
tag 318285 patch
thanks

Hi,

Here's the CAN-2005-2240 fix for woody and sarge (sid upload is already
in incoming).

Cheers,

Matej
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
--- xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
 
 set tfck [ info exists trace_file ]
 
-if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file "/tmp/xpvm.trace.$user" }
+if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file [ file join [ glob ~ ] ".xpvm_trace" ] }
 
 $CTRL.file_entry insert 0 $trace_file
 
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
--- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+xpvm (1.2.5-7.2woody1) oldstable-security; urgency=high
+
+  * QA upload.
+  * Use ~/.xpvm_trace instead of /tmp/xpvm.trace.$USER to prevent symlink
+attacks.  (Trace files are meant to be semi-persistent, so this is more
+in line with user expectations than creating unique temporary files.)
+[src/xpvm.tcl, src/help/traces.help, debian/xpvm.1, CAN-2005-2240]
+Closes: #318285.
+
+ -- Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 14:44:07 +0200
+
 xpvm (1.2.5-7.2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * NMU
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
--- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 .BI \-T\  trace
 .B xpvm
 will normally create and store a trace file in the 
-.I /tmp
+user's home
 directory. To have the 
 .I trace
 file stored in some other location, use this option.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- xpvm-1.2.5.orig/src/help/traces.help
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/help/traces.help
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 { to have a valid, writable trace file to work with, and so XPVM }
 { assumes a default trace file name: }
 {}
-{  /tmp/xpvm.trace.$(USER) }
+{  ~/.xpvm_trace }
 {}
 { On the first execution of XPVM, this trace file will not yet exist, }
 { and so XPVM will proceed to write traces into this file and read }
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
--- xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
 
 set tfck [ info exists trace_file ]
 
-if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file "/tmp/xpvm.trace.$user" }
+if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file [ file join [ glob ~ ] ".xpvm_trace" ] }
 
 $CTRL.file_entry insert 0 $trace_file
 
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
--- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+xpvm (1.2.5-7.3sarge1) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+  * QA upload.
+  * Use ~/.xpvm_trace instead of /tmp/xpvm.trace.$USER to prevent symlink
+attacks.  (Trace files are meant to be semi-persistent, so this is more
+in line with user expectations than creating unique temporary files.)
+[src/xpvm.tcl, src/help/traces.help, debian/xpvm.1, CAN-2005-2240]
+Closes: #318285.
+
+ -- Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 14:44:07 +0200
+
 xpvm (1.2.5-7.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Uploading with maintainer set to QA Group
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
--- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 .BI \-T\  trace
 .B xpvm
 will normally create and store a trace file in the 
-.I /tmp
+user's home
 directory. To have the 
 .I trace
 file stored in some other location, use this option.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- xpvm-1.2.5.orig/src/help/traces.help
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/help/traces.help
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 { to have a valid, writable trace file to work with, and so XPVM }
 { assumes a default trace file name: }
 {}
-{  /tmp/xpvm.trace.$(USER) }
+{  ~/.xpvm_trace }
 {}
 { On the first execution of XPVM, this trace file will not yet exist, }
 { and so XPVM will proceed to write traces into this file and read }


Processed: Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 318285 patch
Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#197691: marked as done (make /var/state/kernellab writeable by group src)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19S1Eq-00068Y-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:04 -0500
Received: (qmail 4469 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:02 -
Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42)
  by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:02 -
Received: (qmail 755 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:29 -
Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123)
  by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:29 -
Received: (nullmailer pid 3284 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:53:56 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: make /var/state/kernellab writeable by group src
Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:53:56 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: normal

this makes fakeroot kernellab as a user in the src group possible 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot  0.7.3  Gives a fake root environment
ii  kernel-package8.040  A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.0-18   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 197691-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream
and doesn't work with current kernels.  (See Bug#264219.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#197690: marked as done (kernellab should also keep track of gcc version)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19S1Es-000695-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:06 -0500
Received: (qmail 4496 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:04 -
Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42)
  by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:04 -
Received: (qmail 703 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:28 -
Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123)
  by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:28 -
Received: (nullmailer pid 3254 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:49:13 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernellab should also keep track of gcc version
Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:49:13 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: wishlist

it would be particularly useful if kernellab could additionally keep
track of the gcc version used for kernel compilation, i.e. option
--gcc=gcc2.95 or --gcc=gcc3.2 etc...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot  0.7.3  Gives a fake root environment
ii  kernel-package8.040  A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.0-18   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 197690-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream
and doesn't work with current kernels.  (See Bug#264219.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#197688: marked as done (allow for more generic patches)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19S1Eq-00068W-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:04 -0500
Received: (qmail 4465 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:01 -
Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42)
  by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:01 -
Received: (qmail 735 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:29 -
Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123)
  by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:29 -
Received: (nullmailer pid 3269 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:52:16 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: allow for more generic patches
Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:52:16 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: wishlist

I would suggest using a single directory for patches to be applied,
e.g. /var/state/kernellab/patches, where patches are of the form:
/var/state/kernellab/patches/patch-n.n.n-ac42.bz2
/var/state/kernellab/patches/patch-n.n.n-benh23.bz2

and are appled in alphabetical order.
Patches might start with - (e.g. 01-patch-2.4.21-benh7.bz2)
All these suffixes should be appended, e.g.
into config/kernel -> config-2.4.21-ac23-ben7 / 2.4.21-ac23-ben7

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot  0.7.3  Gives a fake root environment
ii  kernel-package8.040  A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.0-18   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 197688-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream
and doesn't work with current kernels.  (See Bug#264219.)


-- 

Bug#176200: marked as done (kernellab: kernellab doesn't work if kernel archive extracts to linux-x.x.xx/)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2003 00:16:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 10 18:16:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) 
[134.130.3.130] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18X9Kc-00051I-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:16:58 -0600
Received: from ms-2 (ms-2 [134.130.3.131]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 1 (built Aug 19 2002))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:29 +0100 (MET)
Received: from r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.3.31])
by ms-2 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.0 Beta3) ; Sat,
 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [134.130.180.1])
by r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.12.1/8.11.3/26) with ESMTP id 
h0B0FSGi027496
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mcknight.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de
 (mcknight.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.181.112])
by kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA16483   
for
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100
Received: from joe by mcknight.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de with local
 (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))id 18X9JA-0004KH-00; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 
+0100
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:15:28 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernellab: kernellab doesn't work if kernel archive extracts to
 linux-x.x.xx/
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: important

# kernellab -c mcknight
kernellab: kernel source didn't unpack in 'linux'

kernellab is right, but it should also handle this situation:

# tar tfj linux-2.4.20.tar.bz2 | head -10
linux-2.4.20/
linux-2.4.20/Makefile
linux-2.4.20/MAINTAINERS
linux-2.4.20/CREDITS
linux-2.4.20/Rules.make
linux-2.4.20/README
linux-2.4.20/COPYING
linux-2.4.20/fs/
linux-2.4.20/fs/xattr.c
linux-2.4.20/fs/super.c


Joachim

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux mcknight 2.4.19mcknight #1 SMP Sun Nov 24 14:07:18 CET 
2002 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot   0.4.4-9.2  Gives a fake root environment.
ii  kernel-package 7.107  Debian Linux kernel package build scripts.
ii  perl   5.6.1-8.2  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report
^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5)


---
Received: (at 176200-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 test

Processed: Package changed name

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 224019 python-zsi
Bug#224019: python2.3-zsi: Lacks docs
Bug reassigned from package `python2.3-zsi' to `python-zsi'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#121201: marked as done (kernellab: doesn't work with debian kernel-source packages)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2001 09:55:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 03:55:15 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from aponcelet-101-2-1-171.abo.wanadoo.fr (zenon.apartia.com) 
[193.251.42.171] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 168ITr-00069S-00; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 03:55:15 -0600
Received: by zenon.apartia.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BB274772C2; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:55:08 +0100 (CET)
From: Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernellab: doesn't work with debian kernel-source packages
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.37
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.37
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:55:08 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: normal

kernellab seems a great tool but it doesn't integrate with Debian
kernel-source packages:

1) it expects a "linux-X.X.X.tar.bz2" and not the standard debian
"kernel-source-2.4.14.tar.bz2"

2) it expects the tarball to extract to linux/ (which the deb doesn't)

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zenon 2.4.14 #10 Tue Nov 20 10:42:02 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot  0.4.5-2Gives a fake root environment.
ii  kernel-package7.74   Debian Linux kernel package build 
ii  perl [perl5]  5.6.1-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 


---
Received: (at 121201-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream
and doesn't work with current kernels.  (See Bug#264219.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#197689: marked as done (wrong output on -h)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19S1Er-00068c-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:05 -0500
Received: (qmail 4484 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:03 -
Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42)
  by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:03 -
Received: (qmail 817 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:30 -
Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123)
  by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:30 -
Received: (nullmailer pid 3336 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:57:04 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wrong output on -h
Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:57:04 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: important

on -h it gives
usage: kernellab [options]  [[-ac] [..]]

but it should be

usage: kernellab [options]  [[-ac] 
[,,...]]

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot  0.7.3  Gives a fake root environment
ii  kernel-package8.040  A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.0-18   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 197689-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream
and doesn't work with current kernels.  (See Bug#264219.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#197692: marked as done (does fail on mol-modules-source)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 16:10:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.mediaways.net [193.189.224.113] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19S1Er-000691-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:10:06 -0500
Received: (qmail 4488 invoked by uid 4221); 16 Jun 2003 21:10:04 -
Received: from brln-d9ba0b2a.pool.mediaways.net (HELO fortknox) (217.186.11.42)
  by smtp-relay.mediaways.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:10:04 -
Received: (qmail 788 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 21:04:30 -
Received: from unknown (HELO no) (192.168.0.123)
  by fortknox.dyndns.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 21:04:30 -
Received: (nullmailer pid 3312 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:55:33 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: does fail on mol-modules-source
Reply-To: Humberto Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:55:33 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: normal

I can compile the module using make-kpkg modules but with kernellab I
get:

dh_builddeb --destdir=/tmp/kernellab.1055516557.23219/linux/..
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 2
package `drm-trunk-module-2.4.21-rc3-ben0':
 error in Version string `2003.05.04-1+1:no.20030613.1': epoch in
 version is not number

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux no 2.4.21-rc3-ben0 #1 Wed Jun 11 20:20:45 CEST 2003 ppc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot  0.7.3  Gives a fake root environment
ii  kernel-package8.040  A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.0-18   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 197692-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7

kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream
and doesn't work with current kernels.  (See Bug#264219.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Bug#222751: marked as done (kernellab: Add flavour to extraversion instead of revision)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2003 18:41:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 02 12:41:40 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from math3f.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de (math3f) [129.187.111.48] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ARFSt-0007pJ-00; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:41:39 -0600
Received: by math3f (Postfix, from userid 666)
id 4D64A205297; Tue,  2 Dec 2003 19:41:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernellab: Add flavour to extraversion instead of revision
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 19:41:38 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

right now, kernel package puts the flavour (or host name) into the
package revision.  This means that all packages created from, say,
linux-2.4.23.tar.bz2 are different version of kernel-image-2.4.23 and
cannot be distinguished by the packaging system.  It would be nice if
kernellab automatically added an extraversion, resulting in packages
named kernel-image-2.4.23-router1, kernel-image-2.4.23-router2 and so
on.  The required change to kernellab is both trivial and small.

Regards, Jens.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux math3f 2.4.23-scenic #1 Tue Dec 2 18:51:53 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot  0.4.4-9.2  Gives a fake root environment.
ii  kernel-package7.107  Debian Linux kernel package build 
ii  perl [perl5]  5.6.1-8.3  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 


---
Received: (at 222751-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream
and doesn't work with current kernels.  (See Bug#264219.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#81731: marked as done (be able to use dirs)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2001 00:48:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 09 18:48:27 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from paris11-nas10-39-41.dial.proxad.net (jcb.yi.org) [212.27.39.41] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14G9RB-0008Iw-00; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 18:48:26 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jcb.yi.org (Sendmail 8.11.1) id f0A0n4S01615;
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:49:04 +0100
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:49:04 +0100
From: Jean Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: be able to use dirs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.8
X-Location: home
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: reportbug
Version: 1.8
Severity: wishlist

it would be very nice if kernellab could use directories
like the kernel archives ...
something like
/usr/src/linux-2.2.18 ...
..-2.4.0 ...




-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zeus 2.2.18 #1 Sat Dec 23 13:18:43 CET 2000 i686

Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii  python-base   1.5.2-11   An interactive object-oriented scr
ii  python-newt   0.50.8-2   A newt module for Python. 
ii  whiptail  0.50.8-2   Displays user-friendly dialog boxe

---
Received: (at 81731-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10

kernellab has been removed from Debian because it's orphaned upstream
and doesn't work with current kernels.  (See Bug#264219.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#224604: marked as done (kernellab: lacking useful documentation)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2003 15:31:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 20 09:31:46 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h-68-165-135-69.dnvtco56.covad.net (asgardsrealm.net) 
[68.165.135.69] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AXiot-0005go-00; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:15:07 -0600
Received: (qmail 28069 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2003 15:15:06 -
Received: from unknown (HELO cerberus) (192.168.10.80)
  by forseti.asgardsrealm.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2003 15:15:06 -
Received: from jcollins by cerberus with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AXios-00039v-00; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 08:15:06 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernellab: lacking useful documentation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 08:15:06 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernellab
Version: 0.2.5
Severity: important

Documentation is sorely lacking.  There is no indication of how to
setup kernellab only a brief reference of:

   Say someone discovers a denial of service -attack in the linux TCP/IP
   stack. So you wait two hours till Alan Cox puts out a new -ac42
   patch, download this patch and put in to
   /var/state/kernellab/alancox/patch-n.n.n-ac42.bz2. Now, all you need
   to do to recompile the new, fixed, kernel for all your routers, is

   for a in router1 router2 router3 ...; do kernellab "$a"; done

Sure, but how does one setup kernellab in the first place?

Through reading the config file it is found that the kernel sources are
to be stored compressed as gz or bz2 files, but this isn't in the
documentation anywhere.

Additionally kernellab can't handle Debian kernel sources package names
of kernel-source-n.n.n.tar.bz2 (#121201).  It also expect the kernel 
source archive to unpack into a directory called "linux" based on the
error message (#176200).

Are the configs to be named in any special way?  I was not able to find
the naming convention to get kernallab to use my existing kernel config.

These assumptions/requirements should be documented in the package
documentation.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cerberus 2.4.22-ar-k7 #1 Fri Dec 19 14:06:09 MST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages kernellab depends on:
ii  fakeroot  0.8.2  Gives a fake root environment
ii  kernel-package8.070  A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.0-18   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 224604-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:36:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:36:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvbf-0004YW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:36:27 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84EaHpo004535;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:17 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84EaYx6011558;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84EaYw5011556;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:36:34 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject

Processing of sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.changes

2005-09-04 Thread Archive Administrator
sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  sodipodi_0.34-1.dsc
  sodipodi_0.34-1.diff.gz
  sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
sodipodi_0.34-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1.diff.gz
sodipodi_0.34-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1.dsc
sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 287925 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#202961: marked as done (NMU: diskless 0.3.18.0.1)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:26:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless is orphaned
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2003 14:18:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 26 09:18:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0201.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.29] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19gPsQ-0004Vs-00; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 09:18:26 -0500
Received: from seb128 (AMetz-102-1-5-132.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.48.174.132])
by mwinf0201.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP
id 21AE830003A9; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 16:18:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from seb128 by seb128 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19gPsO-0002s7-00; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 16:18:24 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0371534711=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NMU: diskless 0.3.18.0.1
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 16:18:24 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,
  PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===0371534711==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

There is the patch of the 0.3.18.0.1 NMU that fix 189569 RC bug.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux seb128 2.4.21 #4 mar jui 8 01:20:22 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-15 (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages diskless depends on:
ii  debootstrap   0.1.17.33  Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii  libmd5-perl   2.02-3.1   backwards-compatible wrapper for D
ii  m41.4-15 a macro processing language
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.0-18   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


--===0371534711==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="/home/seb128/nmu-diskless.patch"

diff -Nur ../../debian/changelog ./changelog
--- ../../debian/changelog  2002-04-30 11:24:18.0 +0200
+++ ./changelog 2003-07-26 15:20:37.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+diskless (0.3.18.0.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU, with maintainer authorisation, to fix an RC bug.
+  * debian/control 
+- Changed Build-Depends from docbook-stylesheets to docbook-dsssl 
+  (Closes: #189569).
+
+ -- Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:31:29 +0200
+
 diskless (0.3.18) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Minor touch ups.
diff -Nur ../../debian/control ./control
--- ../../debian/control2002-01-23 09:59:04.0 +0100
+++ ./control   2003-07-26 15:21:13.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 Standards-Version: 3.5.5
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), jade, docbook-stylesheets, 
sgml-data, docbook-xml
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), jade, docbook-dsssl, sgml-data, 
docbook-xml
 
 Package: diskless
 Architecture: all

--===0371534711==--

---
Received: (at 202961-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 17:26:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 10:26:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EByGC-000120-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:26:28 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84HPuKc026052
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:25:56 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84HQD69013963
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#242938: marked as done (diskless: RFA)

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:30:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already filed as Bug#107808
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2004 19:43:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 09 12:43:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asp.sccoast.net [66.153.203.150] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BC1uI-MK-00; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:43:18 -0700
Received: from htc.com (htcsweeper.htc.com [172.21.253.101])
by asp.sccoast.net with ESMTP id i39JhGD8005671
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MAILSERVER.htc.com (unverified) by htc.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:43:15 -0400
Received: from bobcat.htc.com (ts1.htc.com [172.21.1.121]) by 
MAILSERVER.htc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 
5.5.2653.13)
id H5LFYW9W; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:43:16 -0400
Received: from htc-361-2.htc.com
([172.16.4.161] helo=[127.0.0.1] ident=james)
by bobcat.htc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1BC1uG-00033o-00; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:43:16 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: James Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: RFA
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:04:52 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.4
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages diskless depends on:
ii  debootstrap   0.2.31 Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii  libmd5-perl   2.02-3.1   backwards-compatible wrapper for D
ii  m41.4-17 a macro processing language
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.3-3Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


HTC Disclaimer:  The information contained in this message may be privileged 
and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for 
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.  
Thank you.

---
Received: (at 242938-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 17:29:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 10:29:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EByJZ-0001wX-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:29:57 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j84HTpRb026432
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:29:51 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j84HU8hq014007
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:30:08 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j84HU8cd014005
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:30:08 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:30:08 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Already filed as Bug#107808
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.d

Processing of wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.changes

2005-09-04 Thread Archive Administrator
wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  wmfire_1.2.1-5.dsc
  wmfire_1.2.1-5.diff.gz
  wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-09-04 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
wmfire_1.2.1-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5.diff.gz
wmfire_1.2.1-5.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5.dsc
wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 316764 322524 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]