Bug#323820: marked as done (manpages-ru: Russian man pages are only shown in ru_RU.KOI8-R locale)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323820: fixed in manpages-ru 0.98-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 17:16:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 10:16:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.hw.ru [194.67.32.240] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5o0C-0005K8-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:16:28 -0700
Received: from [194.186.128.26] (account [EMAIL PROTECTED] HELO sghpc)
  by mail.hw.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 56047231 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:16:21 
+0400
Received: from stepan by sghpc with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E5o00-00036e-TF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:16:16 +0500
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:16:16 +0500
From: Stepan Golosunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: manpages-ru: Russian man pages are only shown in ru_RU.KOI8-R locale
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: manpages-ru
Version: 0.7d-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch

In ru_RU.UTF-8 and ru_RU.CP1251 locales man mv is shown in English.
Moving man pages from /usr/share/man/ru_RU.KOI8-R/ to /usr/share/man/ru/
solves the problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- no debconf information

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rules.patch"

--- debian/rules.orig   2005-08-18 21:28:50.295640240 +0500
+++ debian/rules2005-08-18 21:28:17.134681000 +0500
@@ -21,10 +21,10 @@
dh_installdirs
 
# Add here commands to install the package into debian/.
-   dh_install man? usr/share/man/ru_RU.KOI8-R
+   dh_install man? usr/share/man/ru
 
# Move environ(5) to environ(7).
-   cd debian/manpages-ru/usr/share/man/ru_RU.KOI8-R \
+   cd debian/manpages-ru/usr/share/man/ru \
&& sed '/^\.TH/s/5/7/' man5/environ.5 > man7/environ.7 \
&& rm man5/environ.5
 

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--

---
Received: (at 323820-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 06:52:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 23:52:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E60ef-0007bQ-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:47:05 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323820: fixed in manpages-ru 0.98-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:47:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: manpages-ru
Source-Version: 0.98-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
manpages-ru, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

manpages-ru_0.98-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/manpages-ru/manpages-ru_0.98-2.diff.gz
manpages-ru_0.98-2.dsc
  to pool/main/m/manpages-ru/manpages-ru_0.98-2.dsc
manpages-ru_0.98-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/manpages-ru/manpages-ru_0.98-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated manpages-ru package

manpages-ru_0.98-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
manpages-ru_0.98-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/manpages-ru/manpages-ru_0.98-2.diff.gz
manpages-ru_0.98-2.dsc
  to pool/main/m/manpages-ru/manpages-ru_0.98-2.dsc
manpages-ru_0.98-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/manpages-ru/manpages-ru_0.98-2_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 323820 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of metamail_2.7-49_i386.changes

2005-08-19 Thread Archive Administrator 
metamail_2.7-49_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  metamail_2.7-49.dsc
  metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
  metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#311002: metamail should provide mmencode as a synonym for mimencode

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 311002 moreinfo
Bug#311002: metamail should provide mmencode as a synonym for mimencode
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311002: metamail should provide mmencode as a synonym for mimencode

2005-08-19 Thread Matej Vela 
tag 311002 moreinfo
thanks

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 05:49:14PM +0100, Brendan Halpin wrote:
> Package: metamail
> Version: 2.7-47
> Severity: important
> 
> Some programs that depend on metamail invoke mimencode via its old 8.3
> /bin/bash: line 1: wq: command not found
> suffice.

A part of the message is missing...  Which programs?

Thanks,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300756: marked as done (/usr/bin/mailto: dies with sigseg if end of file while reading to:)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300756: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 16:13:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 08:13:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uucp.gnuu.de [151.189.20.84] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDPXH-000576-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:13:48 -0800
Received: from alea.gnuu.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by uucp.gnuu.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with bsmtp id j2LGDklM045048
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:13:46 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from ibook.localnet ([192.168.0.5] helo=alea.gnuu.de)
by alea.gnuu.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DDMhe-0007gw-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:12:18 +0100
Received: from joerg by alea.gnuu.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DDMhU-0004YZ-DU
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:12:08 +0100
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:12:08 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/bin/mailto: dies with sigseg if end of file while reading to:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-47
Severity: normal

Hi,

if you hit ^D when you are prompted for the to:, mailto dies with sigseg.

$ mailto < /dev/null=20
To: Segmentation fault

J=F6rg.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages metamail depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii  libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal =
hand

-- no debconf information

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQj7IJ4Z13Cz2nwVYAQJCZwf9FKJTxplCQmak1cuDrWjcE/SQ/X748bnG
IVGTOkp+oh6fF6us+QAPB7Ar7X6uIZsDDv4C1tPusQD4YC8j9PC2uf2BNdPtAwMw
C8cduiYhvWXIPziLtLGZYxKh9AWdBuwW4pgY91IOX6bDjXNE1RZrY2Eu4NikG7WM
ur+qY1ZZ8EQ9/gRvGrVStafQkC5lSrXzgWFNcm5NE6TNN4sLt0yJ1l+sd5iapKPS
wpXaTfj3Q6zI7B9WROgfs/gIvIyRXLenCR8ZwlPzX4y6LtqxAZ0fXnoaZdYOkpeL
3p6pvGUG/Ui/tZl73BisuNREY1UXTrrju2yENtU1VU7/WtA8Mzavow==
=Xw8i
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--

---
Received: (at 300756-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 09:49:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 02:49:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E63Sy-00013T-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#300756: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: metamail
Source-Version: 2.7-49

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
metamail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-49.dsc
  to

Bug#273195: marked as done (metamail: uuenpipe does not offer base64 despite help says so)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273195: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2004 13:40:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 24 06:40:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.logi-track.com (mail.logi-track.com) [213.239.193.212] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CAqJg-00022A-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:40:52 -0700
Received: from kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com (G6f46.g.pppool.de 
[80.185.111.70])
by mail.logi-track.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD0D3001B;
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:40:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5D5E2AB2F5; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:40:19 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: metamail: uuenpipe does not offer base64 despite help says so
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:40:19 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-45.3
Severity: normal

Hi,

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uuenpipe -h
cat: Ung=FCltige Option -- h
,,cat --help" gibt weitere Informationen.
Usage: uuencode [INFILE] REMOTEFILE

  -h, --help  display this help and exit
  -m, --base64use base64 encoding as of RFC1521
  -v, --version   output version information and exit
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uuenpipe -m
cat: Ung=FCltige Option -- m
,,cat --help" gibt weitere Informationen.
Try `uuencode --help' for more information.
 =20


So "uuenpipe -h" output could be interpreted that there is a -m option,
while there is none, although it could be us, although it could be
useful.

Thanks,
Markus

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1-fire
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages metamail depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared librar=
ies an
ii  libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for termina=
l hand

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 273195-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 09:49:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 02:49:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E63Sy-00013P-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#273195: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: metamail
Source-Version: 2.7-49

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
metamail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-49.dsc
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.dsc
metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated metamail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their

Bug#220201: marked as done (fastforward-src: ld.so warnings)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:58:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 11:55:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 11 05:55:50 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from xenian.net (soniq.net) [194.152.178.42] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJX7b-0005pv-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:55:47 -0600
Received: (qmail 31373 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Nov 2003 11:54:49 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fastforward-src: ld.so warnings
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:54:49 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: fastforward-src
Version: 0.51-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

elysium:/tmp/fastforward# newaliases
ld.so: Incorrectly built binary which accesses errno or h_errno
directly.
ld.so: See /usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz.

ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10  GNU C Library:


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux elysium.soniq.net 2.4.21-3-k6 #1 Sun Jul 20 18:24:45 EST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages fastforward-src depends on:
ii  dpkg-dev  1.10.18Package building tools for Debian
ii  fakeroot  0.8.1  Gives a fake root environment
ii  gcc   4:3.3.1-2  The GNU C compiler.
ii  make  3.80-4 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii  patch 2.5.9-1Apply a diff file to an original

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 220201-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 09:59:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 02:59:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E63eP-0003jp-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:59:01 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j7J9wYDJ029842
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:58:34 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7J9wZm6012145
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:58:35 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7J9wZDY012143
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:58:35 +0200
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:58:35 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

fastforward-src was removed from Debian in November 2002.  Please see
 for details.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

metamail_2.7-49_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-49.dsc
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.dsc
metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 177823 273195 296120 300756 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#177823: marked as done (metamail: man page does not explain the -E option)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177823: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 03:02:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 21 21:02:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlas.dgp.toronto.edu [128.100.4.1] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bB9u-0005Bn-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:02:34 -0600
Received: from mac.dgp.toronto.edu 
(CPEe85dc7f4-CM024390013315.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.102.133])
by atlas.dgp.toronto.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A0D284F812; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:02:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mac.dgp.toronto.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id ECE0D78C07; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:02:29 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: metamail: man page does not explain the -E option
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:02:29 -0500 (EST)
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "Reply-To" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-45
Severity: normal

The man page for "metamail" mentions the -E option in the SYNOPSIS, but fails
to explain it in more detail in the OPTIONS section.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux numenor 2.2.20 #2 Sun Jun 30 12:16:37 EDT 2002 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages metamail depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.1-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libncurses55.3.20021109-1 Shared libraries for terminal handling

---
Received: (at 177823-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 09:51:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 02:51:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E63Sy-00013N-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#177823: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: metamail
Source-Version: 2.7-49

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
metamail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-49.dsc
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.dsc
metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated metamail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:25:02 +0200
Source: metamail
Binary: metamail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7-49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 metamail   - implementation of MIME
Closes: 177823 273195 296120 300756
Changes: 
 metamail (2.7-49) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * bin/uuenpipe, bin/uudepipe: Properly handle unreadable files,
 filenames beginning with "-", and filenames containing whitespace.
 (These scripts were not meant to take options.)  Closes: #273195.
   * src/metamail/mailto.c (GetLineMalloced): Fix segfault caused by
 freeing static storage.

Bug#296120: marked as done (metamail: richtext(1) does not mention the -e option)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296120: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 12:03:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 20 04:03:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from boumbo.salle-s.org [82.231.153.6] (qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2poR-0004Ox-00; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:03:47 -0800
Received: (qmail 2042 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2005 12:03:31 -
Received: from greement.salle-s.org (192.168.0.2)
  by boumbo.salle-s.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2005 12:03:31 -
Received: (qmail 28104 invoked by uid 512); 20 Feb 2005 12:03:54 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: metamail: richtext(1) does not mention the -e option
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:03:32 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-46
Severity: normal

The program richtext normally handles text/richtext files. But, it can 
also handle text/enriched files (one major difference between the two
formats is the line-breaking rules) as my /etc/mailcap file revealed :
text/enriched; richtext -e '%s'; description="Enriched Text"; copiousoutput

The -e option is not described in the manpage, which is very confusing.

---
Received: (at 296120-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 09:49:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 02:49:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E63Sy-00013R-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#296120: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: metamail
Source-Version: 2.7-49

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
metamail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-49.dsc
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.dsc
metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated metamail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:25:02 +0200
Source: metamail
Binary: metamail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7-49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 metamail   - implementation of MIME
Closes: 177823 273195 296120 300756
Changes: 
 metamail (2.7-49) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * bin/uuenpipe, bin/uudepipe: Properly handle unreadable files,
 filenames beginning with "-", and filenames containing whitespace.
 (These scripts were not meant to take options.)  Closes: #273195.
   * src/metamail/mailto.c (GetLineMalloced): Fix segfault caused by
 freeing static storage.  Closes: #300756.
   *

Get a better job with a Diploma

2005-08-19 Thread Amado Barrett 
You qualify to receive a Genuine Degree in only 2 weeks.

Call for more information:
(717)313-8504

Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping 
you from a great job and better pay was a Degree?
Well now that can change.

BA BSc MA MSc MBA PHD
 Genuine and Valid
 No Study Required
  100% Verifiable

These are real, genuine degrees that include 
Bachelors, Masters and Doctorates. They are verifiable. 
Student records and Transcripts also available. 

This opportunity exists due to a legal loophole
allowing some established colleges to award degrees 
based on life experience.

Take advantage of this opportunity before it is too late!

Call for more information:
(717)313-8504

Sincerely,

Amado Barrett
Career Advancement Counselor
Higher Learning Academy






retract lurk mousy screw paraphrase pelt.
careworn underclassman citizen.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323987: xfs-xtt: FTBFS (ppc64): Please support the ppc64 architecture

2005-08-19 Thread Andreas Jochens 
Package: xfs-xtt
Version: 1:1.4.1.xf430-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

When building 'xfs-xtt' on ppc64/unstable,
I get the following error:

dpkg-buildpackage: source package is xfs-xtt
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1:1.4.1.xf430-6
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture ppc64
 debian/rules clean
debian/rules:108: debian/scripts/vars.ppc64: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `debian/scripts/vars.ppc64'.  Stop.

With the attached patch 'xfs-xtt' can be compiled on ppc64.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xfs-xtt-1.4.1.xf430/debian/scripts/vars.ppc64 
./debian/scripts/vars.ppc64
--- ../tmp-orig/xfs-xtt-1.4.1.xf430/debian/scripts/vars.ppc64   1970-01-01 
00:00:00.0 +
+++ ./debian/scripts/vars.ppc64 2005-08-19 15:49:48.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# This file is NOT a shell script.
+#
+# This file gets included by both debian/rules (make) AND the scripts in
+# debian/scripts (Bourne shell).
+XWSC_SPECIAL_DEPENDS="xserver-xfree86, "


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324005: php4-imagick not updated for new phpapi version

2005-08-19 Thread Matthijs Kooijman 
Package: php4-imagick
Version: 0.9.11-1
Severity: important


There are new versions of the php4 packages: 4.4.0. The phpapi version in
these packages changed, so I can now not upgrade my php, without breaking
php4-imagick.

Gr.

Matthijs


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]