Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296120: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 12:03:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 20 04:03:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from boumbo.salle-s.org [82.231.153.6] (qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2poR-0004Ox-00; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:03:47 -0800
Received: (qmail 2042 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2005 12:03:31 -0000
Received: from greement.salle-s.org (192.168.0.2)
by boumbo.salle-s.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2005 12:03:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 28104 invoked by uid 512); 20 Feb 2005 12:03:54 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: metamail: richtext(1) does not mention the -e option
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:03:32 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-46
Severity: normal
The program richtext normally handles text/richtext files. But, it can
also handle text/enriched files (one major difference between the two
formats is the line-breaking rules) as my /etc/mailcap file revealed :
text/enriched; richtext -e '%s'; description="Enriched Text"; copiousoutput
The -e option is not described in the manpage, which is very confusing.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296120-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 09:49:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 02:49:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E63Sy-00013R-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#296120: fixed in metamail 2.7-49
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: metamail
Source-Version: 2.7-49
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
metamail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-49.dsc
to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49.dsc
metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated metamail package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:25:02 +0200
Source: metamail
Binary: metamail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7-49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
metamail - implementation of MIME
Closes: 177823 273195 296120 300756
Changes:
metamail (2.7-49) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* bin/uuenpipe, bin/uudepipe: Properly handle unreadable files,
filenames beginning with "-", and filenames containing whitespace.
(These scripts were not meant to take options.) Closes: #273195.
* src/metamail/mailto.c (GetLineMalloced): Fix segfault caused by
freeing static storage. Closes: #300756.
* man/metamail.1: Document the -E option. Closes: #177823.
* man/richtext.1: Document the -e option. Closes: #296120.
* Conforms to Standards version 3.6.2.
Files:
54fb75469381984911e350c794203e88 582 mail optional metamail_2.7-49.dsc
c9d8b1a4beb7e4c37a907ee361069ded 342741 mail optional metamail_2.7-49.diff.gz
074f633f01e11111ba6edf6d5c456a92 150464 mail optional metamail_2.7-49_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDBaWFxBYivKllgY8RAtFmAJ4uGqPehjdlb2QOODMor/ajv/oIsQCfYBYH
NqSfCITazsPxwNIrcinrZHQ=
=l6PO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
