Processing of newsflash_0.99-9_i386.changes

2005-06-06 Thread Archive Administrator 
newsflash_0.99-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  newsflash_0.99-9.dsc
  newsflash_0.99-9.diff.gz
  newsflash_0.99-9_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of postit_0.5-5_i386.changes

2005-06-06 Thread Archive Administrator 
postit_0.5-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  postit_0.5-5.dsc
  postit_0.5-5.diff.gz
  postit_0.5-5_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of penggy_0.2.1-7_i386.changes

2005-06-06 Thread Archive Administrator 
penggy_0.2.1-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  penggy_0.2.1-7.dsc
  penggy_0.2.1-7.diff.gz
  penggy_0.2.1-7_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

postit_0.5-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
postit_0.5-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/postit/postit_0.5-5.diff.gz
postit_0.5-5.dsc
  to pool/main/p/postit/postit_0.5-5.dsc
postit_0.5-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postit/postit_0.5-5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

newsflash_0.99-9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
newsflash_0.99-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/newsflash/newsflash_0.99-9.diff.gz
newsflash_0.99-9.dsc
  to pool/main/n/newsflash/newsflash_0.99-9.dsc
newsflash_0.99-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/newsflash/newsflash_0.99-9_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

penggy_0.2.1-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
penggy_0.2.1-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/penggy/penggy_0.2.1-7.diff.gz
penggy_0.2.1-7.dsc
  to pool/main/p/penggy/penggy_0.2.1-7.dsc
penggy_0.2.1-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/penggy/penggy_0.2.1-7_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Save money on buying software!!!

2005-06-06 Thread Eddie 

Any Software..  get rush undr $15-$99..
http://smc.g5kv1xgrd8y5dhy.cateelcate3.com




Coersion, after all, merely captures man. Freedom captivates him.
Every man has business and desire, Such as it is.   




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#294221: marked as done (prcs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): no matching function for call to '__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf >::stdio_filebuf(int, const std::_Ios_Openmode&, bool,

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294221: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Feb 2005 16:07:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 08 08:07:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d157170.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[80.171.157.170] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyXtV-000538-00; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:07:17 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CyXtR-0007bT-Pu; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:07:13 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): no matching function for call to 
'__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf >::stdio_filebuf(int, 
const std::_Ios_Openmode&, bool, const int&)'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:07:13 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: prcs
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'prcs' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./include-O2 -Wall -c -o rebuild.o `test 
-f 'rebuild.cc' || echo './'`rebuild.cc
rebuild.cc: In member function 'void RebuildFile::init_stream()':
rebuild.cc:1009: error: '__c_file' was not declared in this scope
rebuild.cc:1009: error: expected primary-expression before ')' token
rebuild.cc:1010: error: expected `;' before ')' token
make[5]: *** [rebuild.o] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/prcs-1.3.3/src'

With the attached patch 'prcs' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/debian/patches/50_g++-3.4.dpatch 
./debian/patches/50_g++-3.4.dpatch
--- ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/debian/patches/50_g++-3.4.dpatch 2005-02-08 
16:23:11.938608839 +0100
+++ ./debian/patches/50_g++-3.4.dpatch  2005-02-08 16:22:59.998921585 +0100
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
  false /* close */, 
default_segment_size);
  buf->pubseekoff(0, ios::end, ios::out);
 +#else
-+buf = new __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf 
((__c_file*)fdopen(seg->fd()) "w"), ios::out,
++buf = new __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf (seg->fd(), ios::out,
 +default_segment_size);
 +buf->pubseekoff(0, ios::end, ios::out);
  #endif
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/src/hash.cc ./src/hash.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/src/hash.cc  2004-05-10 02:40:55.0 +0200
+++ ./src/hash.cc   2005-02-08 16:20:01.920416570 +0100
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
 
 int hash(FileEntry*const& x, int M)
 {
-  return (unsigned int)x % M;
+  return (unsigned long)x % M;
 }
 
 #define generic template

---
Received: (at 294221-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 19:51:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 12:51:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNdE-0002yJ-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:51:32 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNZt-5S-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#294221: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 12

Source: prcs
Source-Version: 1.3.3-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prcs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.de

Bug#287958: marked as done (prcs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from pointer to 'int' loses precision)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287958: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2004 07:30:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 30 23:30:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d020125.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.20.125] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CkHEm-00086y-00; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:30:16 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CkHK6-0002tE-FC; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:35:46 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from pointer to 'int' loses precision
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:35:46 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: prcs
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'prcs' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get a 'cast from pointer to 'int' loses precision' 
error in src/hash.cc.

With the attached patch 'prcs' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/src/hash.cc ./src/hash.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/src/hash.cc  2004-05-10 02:40:55.0 +0200
+++ ./src/hash.cc   2004-12-30 23:45:06.253971880 +0100
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
 
 int hash(FileEntry*const& x, int M)
 {
-  return (unsigned int)x % M;
+  return (unsigned long)x % M;
 }
 
 #define generic template
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/src/rebuild.cc ./src/rebuild.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/src/rebuild.cc   2004-05-10 03:21:20.0 
+0200
+++ ./src/rebuild.cc2004-12-30 23:43:12.628245616 +0100
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@
 buf->pubseekoff(0, ios::end, ios::out);
 #else
 buf = new __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf (seg->fd(), ios::out,
- false /* close */, 
default_segment_size);
+ false /* close */);
 buf->pubseekoff(0, ios::end, ios::out);
 #endif
os = new ostream(buf);

---
Received: (at 287958-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 19:54:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 12:54:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNfq-0003vr-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:54:14 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNZt-5M-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#287958: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9

Source: prcs
Source-Version: 1.3.3-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prcs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-visualtree_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-visualtree_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
prcs_1.3.3-5.dsc
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5.dsc
prcs_1.3.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution mainten

Bug#272152: marked as done (prcs-el: fails to add lisp directory to load-path for emacs21)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#272152: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2004 21:14:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 14:14:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C8Q3t-0008U3-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:14:33 -0700
Received: from 208-58-76-117.c3-0.grg-ubr3.lnh-grg.md.cable.rcn.com 
([208.58.76.117] helo=tux.internal.ucko.debian.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7)
id 1C8Q3t-AS-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:14:33 -0400
Received: from amu by tux.internal.ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1C8Q3s-00030D-Bz
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:14:32 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs-el: fails to add lisp directory to load-path for emacs21
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:14:32 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: prcs-el
Version: 1.3.3-2
Severity: important

Since GNU Emacs 21 does not recursively search
/usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp, /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50prcs-el.el
should add the prcs subdirectory to load-path for that
implementation.  (In general, it should probably just use
debian-pkg-add-load-path-item unconditionally.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages prcs-el depends on:
ii  emacs21 [emacsen] 21.3+1-7   The GNU Emacs editor
ii  prcs  1.3.3-2The Project Revision Control Syste
ii  xemacs21  21.4.15-7  Editor and kitchen sink
ii  xemacs21-mule [xemacs21]  21.4.15-7  Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule bi
ii  xemacs21-nomule [xemacs21]21.4.15-7  Editor and kitchen sink -- Non-mul

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 272152-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 19:54:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 12:54:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNfp-0003vf-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:54:13 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNZt-5K-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#272152: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

Source: prcs
Source-Version: 1.3.3-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prcs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-visualtree_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-visualtree_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
prcs_1.3.3-5.dsc
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5.dsc
prcs_1.3.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5_i386.deb



A summary of th

Bug#268350: marked as done (prcs: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: no matching function for call to `__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf >::stdio_filebuf(int, const std::_Ios_Openmode&, bool, con

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#268350: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 09:30:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 02:30:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d007195.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [80.171.7.195] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0d4H-0003gr-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:30:45 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1C0d4l-B5-6a; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:31:15 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: no matching function for call to 
`__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf >::stdio_filebuf(int, 
const std::_Ios_Openmode&, bool, const int&)'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:31:15 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: prcs
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'prcs' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:

depfile='.deps/rebuild.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/rebuild.TPo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./include-O2 -Wall -c -o rebuild.o `test 
-f 'rebuild.cc' || echo './'`rebuild.cc
rebuild.cc: In member function `void RebuildFile::init_stream()':
rebuild.cc:1006: error: no matching function for call to 
`__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf >::stdio_filebuf(int, 
const std::_Ios_Openmode&, bool, const int&)'
/usr/include/c++/3.4/ext/stdio_filebuf.h:54: note: candidates are: 
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf >::stdio_filebuf(const 
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf >&)
/usr/include/c++/3.4/ext/stdio_filebuf.h:148: note: 
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<_CharT, _Traits>::stdio_filebuf(std::__c_file*, 
std::_Ios_Openmode, size_t) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = 
std::char_traits]
/usr/include/c++/3.4/ext/stdio_filebuf.h:131: note: 
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<_CharT, _Traits>::stdio_filebuf(int, 
std::_Ios_Openmode, size_t) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = 
std::char_traits]
/usr/include/c++/3.4/ext/stdio_filebuf.h:68: note: 
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<_CharT, _Traits>::stdio_filebuf() [with _CharT = char, 
_Traits = std::char_traits]
make[5]: *** [rebuild.o] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/prcs-1.3.3/src'

With the attached patch 'prcs' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/src/rebuild.cc ./src/rebuild.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/prcs-1.3.3/src/rebuild.cc   2004-05-10 03:21:20.0 
+0200
+++ ./src/rebuild.cc2004-08-27 11:25:28.807458345 +0200
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@
 buf->pubseekoff(0, ios::end, ios::out);
 #else
 buf = new __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf (seg->fd(), ios::out,
- false /* close */, 
default_segment_size);
+ false /* close */);
 buf->pubseekoff(0, ios::end, ios::out);
 #endif
os = new ostream(buf);

---
Received: (at 268350-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 19:51:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 12:51:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNdG-00030b-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:51:34 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNZt-5I-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#268350: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7

Source: prcs
Source-Version: 1.3.3-5

We believe that the bug you

Bug#204265: marked as done (prcs-mv patch for moving into directory)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204265: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2003 20:28:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 05 15:28:18 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0503.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.26] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19k8Pq-0007Va-00; Tue, 05 Aug 2003 15:28:18 -0500
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (APuteaux-115-1-11-200.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr 
[81.50.66.200])
by mwinf0503.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP
id 8158C68000E9; Tue,  5 Aug 2003 22:28:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19k89q-000715-00; Tue, 05 Aug 2003 22:11:46 +0200
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 22:11:45 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs-mv patch for moving into directory
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.20
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: prcs-utils
Version: 1.3.2-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Here is a patch to prcs-mv - I can't commit it because of the sf cvs outage.

--- /usr/bin/prcs-mv2003-06-10 22:07:41.0 +0200
+++ /home/dwitch/work/debian/mine/buildinfo/prcs-mv 2003-08-05 
22:10:11.0 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
 #!/bin/sh
 set -e
 
+# (c) 2002-2003 Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+# Licenced under the GNU GPL, version 2.
+
 # FIXME: should have an "undo" option
 # FIXME: should use special markers instead of ADDED/DELETED
 
@@ -33,7 +36,16 @@
 # move the file unless -p was given
 if [ $PRJONLY = 0 ]
 then
+# source must exist
 [ -r "$1" ] || error "\`$1' does not exist"
+
+# allow moving into a directory
+if [ -d "$2" ]
+then
+   set -- "$1" "`echo $2 | sed 's,/*$,,'`/`basename $1`"
+fi
+
+# destination must not exist
 [ ! -r "$2" ] || error "\`$2' already exists"
 
 mv -v "$1" "$2"


-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 

---
Received: (at 204265-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 19:54:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 12:54:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNfp-0003vR-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:54:13 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNZt-5G-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#204265: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: prcs
Source-Version: 1.3.3-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prcs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-visualtree_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-visualtree_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
prcs_1.3.3-5.dsc
  to pool/main/p/prc

Bug#156588: marked as done (prcs: problems handling out-of-diskspace condition, does not recover correctly)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156588: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2002 22:37:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 13 17:37:02 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix2-1.free.fr [213.228.0.9] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17ekHe-0008QY-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:37:02 -0500
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (nas-cbv-6-62-147-150-253.dial.proxad.net 
[62.147.150.253])
by postfix2-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id F119B123; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:36:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17ekQI-0004Tc-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:45:58 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:45:58 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs: problems handling out-of-diskspace condition, does not recover 
correctly
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.49
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: prcs
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: important

With the disk holding my repository being full, I get:

| $ prcs checkin -r upstream-2.11.17.@ tau
| prcs: Write failed while write locking lock file 
`/home/dwitch/PRCS/.locks/tau.writers': No space left on device
| prcs: Failed obtaining a repository lock.
| prcs: Command failed.

This seems reasonable, but then if I remove cruft from the disk to
make room, I get:

| $ prcs checkin -r upstream-2.11.17.@ tau
| prcs: Could not obtain a lock because of the following locks:
| prcs: Inconsistant lock information, cannot continue.
| prcs: Command failed.

This looks much less reasonable.  At least the message is confusing,
and nothing is said about how to solve the problem.  Even "rebuild"
fails with the same error:

| $ prcs admin rebuild tau
| prcs: Could not obtain a lock because of the following locks:
| prcs: Inconsistant lock information, cannot continue.
| prcs: Command failed.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.4.18+preempt #1 SMP jeu jui 11 22:30:25 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français

Versions of packages prcs depends on:
ii  libc62.2.5-12GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2   1:2.95.4-11 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  rcs  5.7-13  The GNU Revision Control System

-- no debconf information


-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 

---
Received: (at 156588-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 19:54:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 12:54:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNfn-0003v2-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:54:11 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNZt-5A-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#156588: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: prcs
Source-Version: 1.3.3-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prcs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-utils_1.3.

Bug#294074: marked as done (prcs-el: breaks opening files under unreadable directories)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294074: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 18:59:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 10:59:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyE68-et-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:59:00 -0800
Received: from 208-58-77-33.c3-0.grg-ubr3.lnh-grg.md.cable.rcn.com 
([208.58.77.33] helo=tux.internal.ucko.debian.net)
by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7)
id 1CyE5y-0005al-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:58:50 -0500
Received: from amu by tux.internal.ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1CyE5w-0002z9-HC
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:58:48 -0500
From: Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs-el: breaks opening files under unreadable directories
X-Debbugs-CC: Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:58:48 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: prcs-el
Version: 1.3.3-3
Severity: important

It is possible for a directory to be executable but not readable, in
which case one can access its contents by name but not list them.  For
instance, the pam-tmpdir module I have installed sets up per-user
temporary directories under /tmp/user, which has rwx--x--x
permissions.

Attempting to open a file under such a directory in Emacs with prcs-el
installed blows out; I'm including a backtrace at the end of this
report.

As such, I'd suggest wrapping prcs-is-potentially-prcs-controlled's
call to directory-files with condition-case:

(condition-case nil (directory-files ...) (error nil))

(This may also help work around the bad interaction with ange-ftp
noted in that function's comments.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages prcs-el depends on:
ii  emacs21 [emacsen] 21.3+1-9   The GNU Emacs editor
ii  prcs  1.3.3-3The Project Revision Control Syste
ii  xemacs21  21.4.16-1  Editor and kitchen sink
ii  xemacs21-mule [xemacs21]  21.4.16-1  Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule bi
ii  xemacs21-nomule [xemacs21]21.4.16-1  Editor and kitchen sink -- Non-mul

-- no debconf information

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (file-error "Opening directory" "permission 
denied" "/tmp/user/")
  directory-files("/tmp/user/" t 
"^[A-Za-z0-9#%^_+:,][A-Za-z0-9#%^_+:,-=.]*\\.prj$")
  (save-excursion (set-buffer (get-buffer-create "*scratch*")) (directory-files 
test-dir t "^[A-Za-z0-9#%^_+:,][A-Za-z0-9#%^_+:,-=.]*\\.prj$"))
  (let* ((test-dir ...) (test-files ...)) (setq potential (nconc potential 
test-files)))
  (progn (setq idx (match-end 0)) (let* (... ...) (setq potential ...)))
  (if (string-match "/" dir idx) (progn (setq idx ...) (let* ... ...)) (setq 
stop t))
  (while (not stop) (if (string-match "/" dir idx) (progn ... ...) (setq stop 
t)))
  (let ((idx 0) (stop nil)) (while (not stop) (if ... ... ...)) nil)
  (catch (quote --cl-block-nil--) (let (... ...) (while ... ...) nil))
  (cl-block-wrapper (catch (quote --cl-block-nil--) (let ... ... nil)))
  (block nil (let (... ...) (while ... ...) nil))
  (do ((idx 0) (stop nil)) (stop nil) (if (string-match "/" dir idx) (progn ... 
...) (setq stop t)))
  (let* ((dir ...) (potential nil)) (do (... ...) (stop nil) (if ... ... ...)) 
(reverse potential))
  
prcs-is-potentially-prcs-controlled("/tmp/user/7286/pts_2/reportbug-bash-20050207-11217-biBW5s")
  (let ((--dolist-temp--27223 ...) try) (while --dolist-temp--27223 (setq try 
...) (let ... ... ... ...) (setq --dolist-temp--27223 ...)) nil)
  (catch (quote --cl-block-nil--) (let (... try) (while --dolist

Bug#177879: marked as done (prcs: prcs aborts when attempting to remove Populate-Ignore patterns during a merge)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177879: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 12:02:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 06:02:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hermes.epita.fr (epita.fr) [163.5.255.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bJae-0007Qg-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:02:44 -0600
Received: from kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [10.223.13.1])
by epita.fr id h0MC2cS26925
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:02:38 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nostromo.lrde.epita.fr ([10.223.13.52] ident=mail)
by kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18bJan-0007iy-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:02:53 +0100
Received: from raph by nostromo.lrde.epita.fr with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18bJan-0008Io-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:02:53 +0100
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs: prcs aborts when attempting to remove Populate-Ignore patterns 
during a merge
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Raphael Poss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:02:53 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: prcs
Version: 1.3.2-6
Severity: important

The bug is easily reproducible.
Here is a sample transcript :

Script started on Wed Jan 22 12:45:40 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/prcs$ export PRCS_REPOSITORY=~prcs/repository

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/prcs$ # project foo was just created, 
empty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/prcs$ prcs checkout foo
prcs: Checkout project `foo' version 0.1.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/prcs$ vi foo.prj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/prcs$ prcs checkin
prcs: Checking in project `foo' version 0.2.
No modifications were found.  Abort(nyq?)[y] n
Empty New-Version-Log.  Enter a log, or proceed(epq?)[p] 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/prcs$ mkdir ../other-dir && cd ../other-dir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/other-dir$ prcs checkout foo
prcs: Checkout project `foo' version 0.2.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/other-dir$ vi foo.prj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/other-dir$ vi diff ../prcs/foo.prj foo.prj
10c10
< (Populate-Ignore ("foo$"))
---
> (Populate-Ignore ())
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/other-dir$ prcs checkin
prcs: Checking in project `foo' version 0.3.
No modifications were found.  Abort(nyq?)[y] n
Empty New-Version-Log.  Enter a log, or proceed(epq?)[p] 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/other-dir$ cd ../prcs 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/prcs$ prcs merge
prcs: Working version:  0.2(w)
prcs: Common version:   0.2
prcs: Selected version: 0.3
prcs: *** Action on populate ignore element `foo$'
prcs: Choose an action on populate ignore element `foo$' for rule 7: Working and
common files are alike; selected file not present.
Please select(dnhq!?)[d] 
prcs: Internal error, attempting to drop core.
prcs: Please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
prcs: When sending bug reports, always include:
prcs: -- a complete description of the problem encountered
prcs: -- the output of `prcs config'
prcs: -- the operating system and version
prcs: -- the architecture.
prcs: If possible, include:
prcs: -- the file `/tmp/prcs_bug', if it exists
prcs: -- the working project file, if one was in use
prcs: -- the output of `ls -lR' in the current directory.
prcs: Disk space permitting, retain the following:
prcs: -- any relevant working project files
prcs: -- a repository package created with `prcs package PROJECT'.
prcs: Disk space not permitting, retain just:
prcs: -- the repository file PRCS/PROJECT/PROJECT.prj,v
prcs: -- the repository log PRCS/PROJECT/prcs_log
prcs: -- the repository data file PRCS/PROJECT/prcs_data
prcs: -- the output of `rlog' on each repository file under PRCS/PROJECT.
prcs: These steps will help diagnose the problem.
prcs: Merge incomplete.
zsh: abort  prcs merge

Script done on Wed Jan 22 12:47:38 2003


The file /tmp/prcs_bug does not exist.

Here is the project file :

;; -*- Prcs -*-
(Created-By-Prcs-Version 1 3 2)
(Project-Description "")
(Project-Version foo 0 2)
(Parent-Version foo 0 1)
(Version-Log "")
(New-Version-Log "")
(Checkin-Time "Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:46:27 +0100")
(Checkin-Login raph)
(Populate-Ignore ())
(Project-Keywords)
(Files
)
(Merge-Parents)
(New-Merge-Parents
  (0.3 incomplete)
)

It happens that /in fine/ the

Bug#149811: marked as done (prcs checkin -n is broken)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#149811: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2002 21:07:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 16:07:28 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix1-2.free.fr [213.228.0.130] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17IFKy-0003Kr-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:07:28 -0500
Received: from localhost (nas-cbv-5-62-147-146-249.dial.proxad.net 
[62.147.146.249])
by postfix1-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 57D5FABEE1; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:51:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwitch by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17IFs7-0006gK-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 23:41:43 +0200
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 23:41:43 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs checkin -n is broken
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.37
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: prcs
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: normal

Importing a new source into PRCS, curiously "checkin -n fails",
whereas the real "checkin" does work:

tau-2.11.12$ prcs checkout tau
tau-2.11.12$ prcs populate --no-keywords
tau-2.11.12$ prcs checkin -n -r Release-2.11.12.@ tau
prcs: Create repository entry `tau'Command failed.
tau-2.11.12$ prcs checkin -r Release-2.11.12.@ tau
prcs: Created repository entry `tau'.
prcs: Checking in project `tau' version Release-2.11.12.1.
Empty New-Version-Log.  Enter a log, or proceed(epq?)[p]


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.4.17-smp+evms+kdb #1 SMP mer mar 27 00:23:14 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français

Versions of packages prcs depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.21:2.95.4-9 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  rcs   5.7-13 The GNU Revision Control System

-- no debconf information


-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 

---
Received: (at 149811-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 19:51:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 12:51:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNdH-000310-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:51:35 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfNZt-58-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#149811: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: prcs
Source-Version: 1.3.3-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prcs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-el_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-synch_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-utils_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs-visualtree_1.3.3-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs-visualtree_1.3.3-5_all.deb
prcs_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5.diff.gz
prcs_1.3.3-5.dsc
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5.dsc
prcs_1.3.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/prcs/prcs_1.3.3-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have

Bug#134047: marked as done (prcs-synch unexpected change in cwd)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#134047: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2002 08:18:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 02:18:33 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de [192.129.1.23] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16bdZh-0006BZ-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 02:18:33 -0600
Received: from laboiss0 (laboiss0.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de [10.129.2.47])
by kom.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA10592;
Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:18:20 +0100 (MET)
Received: from rafael by laboiss0 with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16bdYD-0005BQ-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:17:01 +0100
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:17:01 +0100
From: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "R. Church" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs-synch unexpected change in cwd
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Organization: Max-Planck Institute for Psychological Research -- Munich, Germany
Sender: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: prcs-synch
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Thnaks for your bug report.  I am forwarding your patch to the Debian Bug
Tracking System, just to have it properly registered.  I will take a look at
it ASAP and eventually forward the patch to the upstream maintainer.

-- 
Rafael Laboissiere


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux laboiss0 2.4.16-686 #1 Wed Nov 28 09:27:17 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages prcs-synch depends on:
ii  perl  5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  prcs  1.3.1-1The Project Revision Control Syste
ii  textutils 2.0-11 The GNU text file processing utili

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from laboiss0 ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost)
by laboiss0 with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16bdAn-00057q-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:52:49 +0100
Received: from kom.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de [10.129.1.23]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.7)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:52:49 +0100 
(CET)
Received: from kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de (kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de 
[192.129.1.23])
by kom.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id IAA10365
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:53:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: from sub21-106.member.dsl-only.net (quadrophone.ghostbitch.org) 
[63.105.21.106] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16bdAn-0005D9-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 01:52:49 -0600
Received: by quadrophone.ghostbitch.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id CEB654183C; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:52:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:52:48 -0800
From: "R. Church" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: prcs-synch patch
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Warning: Unsolicited commercial e-mail strictly prohibited.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=UNIFIED_PATCH version=2.01
X-Filter: mailagent [version 3.0 PL73] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I found this patch necessary for using prcs-synch with the --ssh option.
Basically, it seems that the current directory changes when prcs-synch
doesn't expect it.

Patch follows:

--- prcs-synch.orig Thu Feb 14 23:44:42 2002
+++ prcs-synch  Thu Feb 14 23:45:46 2002
@@ -301,10 +301,11 @@
   my %cache;
   sub get_prj($$$;) {
 my ($proj, $vers, $repo)[EMAIL PROTECTED];
+my $working="$tmpdir/prcs-synch-work-$$";
 unless ($cache{$proj}{$vers}{$repo}) {
   debug 2, "Examining $proj version $vers in $repo...";
   $cache{$proj}{$vers}{$repo}=
-   `prcs execute -f -q -r $vers -R $repo $proj $proj.prj -- cat {file}`;
+   `cd $working; prcs execute -f -q -r $vers -R $repo $proj $proj.p

Bug#159853: marked as done (prcs: Prj destoyed when removing file and asking diff -N)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:48:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#159853: fixed in prcs 1.3.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2002 13:49:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 06 08:49:00 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from colt.epita.fr [62.23.180.27] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17nJTn-0002Bt-00; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 08:48:59 -0500
Received: from hermes.epita.fr (hermes.epita.fr [163.5.255.10])
by colt.epita.fr id g86DjpY25260 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
EPITA Paris France Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:45:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from goa.lrde.epita.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [10.223.13.2])
by hermes.epita.fr id g86Djpe20418 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
EPITA Paris France Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:45:51 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from nostromo.lrde.epita.fr ([10.223.13.52] ident=mail)
by goa.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17nJSc-000243-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:47:46 +0200
Received: from akim by nostromo.lrde.epita.fr with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 17nJSb-0003g1-00; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:47:45 +0200
From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs: Prj destoyed when removing file and asking diff -N
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:47:45 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: prcs
Version: 1.3.2-5
Severity: important

I finally managed to have a stripped down version of a bug I found
several times: PRCS can destoyed the PRJ file!!!  And deterministically.

Run the following script:


#! /bin/sh -x

prcs admin pdelete -f prcs-bug

cd /tmp
rm -rf prcs-bug
mkdir prcs-bug
cd prcs-bug

# First checkin.
echo "foo content" >foo
echo "bar content" >bar
echo "baz content" >baz
prcs checkout prcs-bug
prcs populate
prcs checkin -f

# Removal and diff.
rm -f foo bar
prcs populate -df
prcs diff -N

# Prj is destroyed: it holds the content of the first file that was removed.
cat prcs-bug.prj


And see how the .prj gets killed (at the end):

/tmp % ./prcs-bug.sh nostromo 15:46
+ prcs admin pdelete -f prcs-bug
prcs: Remove project `prcs-bug'.  Deleting.
+ cd /tmp
+ rm -rf prcs-bug
+ mkdir prcs-bug
+ cd prcs-bug
+ echo 'foo content'
+ echo 'bar content'
+ echo 'baz content'
+ prcs checkout prcs-bug
prcs: Project not found in repository, initial checkout.
prcs: You may now edit the file `prcs-bug.prj'.
+ prcs populate
prcs: 3 files were added.
+ prcs checkin -f
prcs: Created repository entry `prcs-bug'.
prcs: Checking in project `prcs-bug' version 0.1.
+ rm -f foo bar
+ prcs populate -df
prcs: File `bar' is unavailable.  Deleting.
prcs: File `foo' is unavailable.  Deleting.
prcs: No new files.
prcs: 2 files were deleted.
+ prcs diff -N
prcs: Producing diffs from 0.1 to 0.1(w).
Index: 0.1/prcs-bug.prj
--- 0.1/prcs-bug.prj
+++ 0.1(w)/prcs-bug.prj
@@ -17,8 +17,14 @@
 ;; to version 0.0(w), by akim:

   (baz (prcs-bug/0_baz 1.1 644))
-  (bar (prcs-bug/1_bar 1.1 644))
-  (foo (prcs-bug/2_foo 1.1 644))
+
+
+
+;; Files deleted by populate at Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:46:43 +0200,
+;; from version 0.1(w), by akim:
+
+  ; (foo ())
+  ; (bar ())
 )
 (Merge-Parents)
 (New-Merge-Parents)
Index: 0.1(w)/bar
--- 0.1/bar Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:46:43 +0200 akim (prcs-bug/1_bar 1.1 644)
+++ 0.1(w)/bar Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:46:44 +0200 akim ()
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-bar content
Index: 0.1(w)/foo
--- 0.1/foo Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:46:43 +0200 akim (prcs-bug/2_foo 1.1 644)
+++ 0.1(w)/foo Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:46:44 +0200 akim ()
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-foo content
+ cat prcs-bug.prj
foo content


This bug is not new: I found it a couple of years ago, but it's the
first time I manage to strip it down.


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux nostromo 2.4.17 #9 Wed Jan 2 19:07:31 CET 2002 i686 
unknown unknown GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages prcs depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.5-14   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-11  The GNU stdc++ library
ii  rcs5.7-13 The GNU Revision Control System

---
Received: (at 159853-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 19:5

Processed: Downgrading

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 200785 normal
Bug#200785: prcs-utils: prcs-ediff does not work
Severity set to `normal'.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Grand Theft Rolex

2005-06-06 Thread Stacey 

Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
  
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move. 
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too. 
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars. 
We sell them for much less. 
  
- Replicated to the Smallest Detail
- 98% Perfectly Accurate Markings 
- Signature Green Sticker w/ Serial Number on Watch Back
- Magnified Quickset Date
- Includes all Proper Markings

http://www.timepiecesgalore4u.net/














you kibitz me sightsee me  [2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#220977: marked as done ("prcs -n populate " is rejected)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:25:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2003 23:49:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 15 17:49:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.30] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALAA6-Hx-00; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:49:06 -0600
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (APuteaux-115-1-18-118.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr 
[81.51.176.118])
by mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP
id 19CCA1BFFFD1; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:49:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1ALA9q-WP-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:48:50 +0100
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:48:50 +0100
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: "prcs -n populate " is rejected
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: prcs
Version: 1.3.2-7
Severity: normal

Specifying both -n and a project name to "populate" causes a usage
error, whereas the same line with -n works as expected.

That's useful to only populate with a given set of files.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.4.21-k6+preempt #1 jeu jui 10 10:51:00 CEST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français

Versions of packages prcs depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:3.3.2-4GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  rcs 5.7-13.1 The GNU Revision Control System

-- no debconf information


-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 

---
Received: (at 220977-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 20:25:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 13:25:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from yeast.orebokech.com [82.67.41.165] (romain)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfOAE-0004SB-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:25:38 -0700
Received: from pacem.orebokech.com (pacem.orebokech.com [192.168.1.3])
by yeast.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7A612E8D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  6 Jun 2005 22:25:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pacem.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0FC58B31F0; Mon,  6 Jun 2005 22:25:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug
Organization: The Debian Project
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:25:39 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Use
prcs populate -n 
or
prcs populate  -n

but not

prcs -n populate 

If there was a misunderstanding about this bug, please reopen.

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#150022: marked as done (prcs checkin -n does not show added files)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:22:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2002 22:17:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 14 17:17:34 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17IzNu-0006bA-00; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:17:34 -0500
Received: from localhost (nas-cbv-4-62-147-143-142.dial.proxad.net 
[62.147.143.142])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C36891802C; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 00:17:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwitch by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17IzBZ-0006C8-00; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 00:04:49 +0200
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 00:04:49 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: prcs checkin -n does not show added files
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.40
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: prcs
Version: 1.3.2-3
Severity: normal

When a merge has both "add" and "replace" actions, on checkin we get a
notice about each "replace", but none for "add"s.  This is quite
inconsistent.

Sample session:

tau-2.11.13[1803]$ prcs checkout -r tau-2.11.13.@  tau
prcs: Checkout project `tau' version tau-2.11.13.1.

tau-2.11.13[1804]$ prcs merge -r debian
prcs: Working version:  tau-2.11.13.1(w)
prcs: Common version:   tau-2.11.12.1
prcs: Selected version: debian.9
prcs: *** Action on file `utils/FixMakefile'
prcs: Choose an action on file `utils/FixMakefile' for rule 3: All three files 
exist and are alike in the working and common versions.
Please select(dnmrhvq!?)[r]
prcs: Replace file `utils/FixMakefile' by rule 3
prcs: *** Action on file `src/Profile/Makefile'
prcs: Choose an action on file `src/Profile/Makefile' for rule 3: All three 
files exist and are alike in the working and common versions.
Please select(dnmrhvq!?)[r]
prcs: Replace file `src/Profile/Makefile' by rule 3
prcs: *** Action on file `configure'
prcs: Choose an action on file `configure' for rule 3: All three files exist 
and are alike in the working and common versions.
Please select(dnmrhvq!?)[r]
prcs: Replace file `configure' by rule 3
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/compat'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/compat' for rule 14: Only the selected 
file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/compat' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/rules'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/rules' for rule 14: Only the selected 
file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/rules' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/control'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/control' for rule 14: Only the selected 
file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/control' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/copyright'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/copyright' for rule 14: Only the 
selected file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/copyright' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/changelog'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/changelog' for rule 14: Only the 
selected file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/changelog' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/tau.docs'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/tau.docs' for rule 14: Only the selected 
file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/tau.docs' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/TODO'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/TODO' for rule 14: Only the selected 
file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/TODO' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/tau-examples.examples'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/tau-examples.examples' for rule 14: Only 
the selected file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/tau-examples.examples' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/tau.dirs'
prcs: Choose an action on file `debian/tau.dirs' for rule 14: Only the selected 
file is present.
Please select(anhvq!?)[a]
prcs: Add file `debian/tau.dirs' by rule 14
prcs: *** Action on file `debian/tau-racy.dirs'
prcs: Choose an action on

Bug#312277: albert: relative pathname error

2005-06-06 Thread Rene van Bevern 
Package: albert
Version: 0.4.10.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch pending

albert is broken with at least CMU Common Lisp. (another bug prevents
me from testing it with clisp or sbcl yet) 


I intent to document an ASDF system in /home/rvb/foo/foo.asd using:
(load "/home/rvb/foo/foo.asd")
(albert:document-system :foo)

Albert comes to an error:

Error in function (FLET LISP::LOSE  LISP::UNPARSE-UNIX-ENOUGH):
   #p"/home/rvb/foo/" cannot be represented relative to #p"/home/rvb/"
Backtrace:
  0: ((FLET LISP::LOSE LISP::UNPARSE-UNIX-ENOUGH))
  1: (LISP::UNPARSE-UNIX-ENOUGH #p"/home/rvb/aspectl/" #p"/home/rvb/")
  2: (LISP::MAP1 # 
((#p"/home/rvb/aspectl/" #p"/home/rvb/aspectl/al-packages.lisp" 
#p"/home/rvb/aspectl/lw-compat.lisp" #p"/home/rvb/aspectl/al-clos-mop.lisp" 
#p"/home/rvb/aspectl/al-pointcuts.lisp" ...)) :LIST T)
  3: (ALBERT::GET-SYSTEM-FILES-ASDF #)
  4: (ALBERT::GET-SYSTEM-FILES :ASPECTL)
  5: (ALBERT:DOCUMENT-SYSTEMS :ASPECTL)

I have a fix ready and ITA this package, just filing the bug for
documentation purposes.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-negoyl
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages albert depends on:
ii  common-lisp-controller  4.15 This is a Common Lisp source and c
ii  docbook-dsssl   1.79-3   modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Photoshop, Windows, Office. CHEAP.

2005-06-06 Thread Horace 

LOWEST PRICE GUARANTEED! download and Buy Cds
http://rrgapc.e3itzdept6e3bfe.guttateih.com




In critical moments even the very powerful have need of the weakest. 
If we had no winter, the spring would not be so pleasant. 




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]