Processed: Re: More information
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags #253057 unreproducible Bug#253057: rdiff-backup: reports unchanged files as changed Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#253057: More information
tags #253057 unreproducible thanks On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:35:08AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I will try to reproduce this in the next days and will answer the > question as soon as I have results. Tries to reproduce have been unsuccessful. The cause must have been something that is not present any more. Since unreproducible bugs are hard to fix, the bug can be closed. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Karlsruhe, Germany | lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Bug#253057: marked as done (rdiff-backup: reports unchanged files as changed)
Your message dated Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:28:35 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing case (was Re: More information) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2004 22:00:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 06 15:00:45 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from de46d.ipsec0.torres.ka0.zugschlus.de (torres.ka0.zugschlus.de) [212.126.222.70] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BX5h7-00043Y-00; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 15:00:45 -0700 Received: from janeway.int.ka0.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.31]:33038) by torres.ka0.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (Debian package 4.34-0+1zg1)) id 1BX5h5-0002Lf-Sm; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:00:43 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: rdiff-backup: reports unchanged files as changed Bcc: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:00:41 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: rdiff-backup Version: 0.13.4-1 Severity: normal Hi, rdiff-backup seems to report unchanged files as changed: rdiff-backup --exclude-filelist-stdin --print-statistics --verbosity 5 --force --remote-schema 'ssh -C -l admin -o "userknownhostsfile ../host-key" -i ./ssh-key %s sudo rdiff-backup --server' remotehost::/ remotehost Starting mirror / to remotehost Processing changed file . Processing changed file bin Processing changed file bin/gunzip Processing changed file bin/gzip Processing changed file bin/uncompress Processing changed file bin/zcat Strangely, this doesn't happen for every file on the system, but I can confirm that neither gunzip, gzip, uncompress nor zcat have changed since the last backup. A truckload of other files shows this behavior as well. Am I doing something wrong? Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-janeway Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii librsync1 0.9.6-8 Binary diff library based on the r ii python2.3 2.3.4-1 An interactive high-level object-o ii rdiff 0.9.6-8 Binary diff tool for signature-bas -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 253057-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2004 17:29:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 05 10:29:47 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rocksteady.bowdoin.edu (splinter) [139.140.34.45] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C40pn-0006WE-00; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 10:29:47 -0700 Received: by splinter (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ABB3213F5; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:28:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:28:35 -0400 From: Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Closing case (was Re: More information) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 with kernel 2.6.7-1-686 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4 X-GPG-Key: http://www.thened.net/~alec/static/alec.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transf
Processed: tagging 206252
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 206252 -moreinfo +confirmed -sid Unknown tag/s: +confirmed, -sid. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n. Bug#206252: rdiff-backup: won't follow symlinked toplevel directories Tags were: moreinfo sid Tags removed: moreinfo > severity 224649 wishlist Bug#224649: rdiff-backup either can't deal with files that change while it's running, or complains Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: more tagging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 206252 +confirmed Bug#206252: rdiff-backup: won't follow symlinked toplevel directories Tags were: sid Tags added: confirmed > tags 206252 -sid Bug#206252: rdiff-backup: won't follow symlinked toplevel directories Tags were: confirmed sid Tags removed: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#155885: bugs confirmed, upload pending
package libflash tags 153272 confirmed pending tags 155885 confirmed pending tags 243772 confirmed pending tags 158640 confirmed pending owner 153272 ! owner 155885 ! owner 243772 ! owner 158640 ! thanks I am adopting this package. I have reviewed each of these bugs and have found fixes for them. I will hopefully have a package uploaded within a few days if there are no other big problems. -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2 pgpeTHOtKkxXW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#262379: marked as done (lirc: French debconf templates translation)
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:17:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262379: fixed in lirc 0.6.6-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 20:17:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 13:17:09 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp2.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0204.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqdoS-00050x-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:17:08 -0700 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0204.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 663D9A000111; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:16:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette (AVelizy-101-1-4-81.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.0.81]) by mwinf0204.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AFB41AF0; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:16:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bqdnq-0001gf-Ld; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:16:30 +0200 Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tangerine [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01015-10; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:16:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tangerine.coulon.evette) by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bqdno-0001gW-En; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:16:28 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1642997341==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: lirc: French debconf templates translation X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:16:28 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at coulon.evette Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1642997341== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: lirc Version: 0.6.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n hello, Please find attached the french debconf templates translation, proofread by the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors. This file should be put as debian/po/fr.po in your package build tree. --- Best regards - Jean-Luc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (10001, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-k6-8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --===1642997341== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fr.po" # Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext # documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to # this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # Some information specific to po-debconf are available at # /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: lirc 0.6.6\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-07-22 13:57+0200\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2004-07-18 11:44+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: French \n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "Select drivers to build." msgstr "Pilotes à construire :" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "" "i2c: TV cards from Hauppauge and PixelView. Needs the new I2C stack (present " "on 2.4 kernels). You can get it at:" msgstr "" "i2c : cartes TV de marque Hauppauge et PixelView. Elles nécessitent " "la nouvelle implémentation du protocole i2c (présent dans les noyaux 2.4). " "Vous pouvez l'obtenir à :" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates
Bug#261285: marked as done ([l10n] Czech translation of lirc debconf messages)
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:17:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#261285: fixed in lirc 0.6.6-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2004 21:36:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 24 14:36:09 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from csnt.inf.upol.cz [158.194.80.80] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BoUBc-0007Pp-00; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:36:08 -0700 Received: from phoenix.inf.upol.cz ([158.194.80.13]) by CSNT.inf.upol.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:36:07 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phoenix.inf.upol.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id AB018F2B3F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:36:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:36:03 +0200 From: Miroslav Jezbera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [l10n] Czech translation of lirc debconf messages Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2004 21:36:07.0351 (UTC) FILETIME=[3A94CC70:01C471C6] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ctUzwJm0i+kwMBIK" Content-Disposition: inline --ctUzwJm0i+kwMBIK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: lirc Version: 0.6.6-11 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Hi, this is czech translation of lirc debconf messages in attached cs.po. Regards Miroslav Jezbera --ctUzwJm0i+kwMBIK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="cs.po" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to #this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # #Some information specific to po-debconf are available at #/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # #Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: lirc\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-02-11 10:27-0800\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2004-07-21 15:00+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Miroslav Jezbera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Czech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-2\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "Select drivers to build." msgstr "Vyberte, kter=E9 ovlada=E8e p=F8elo=BEit." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "" "i2c: TV cards from Hauppauge and PixelView. Needs the new I2C stack (prese= nt " "on 2.4 kernels). You can get it at:" msgstr "" "i2x: TV karty od Hauppauge a PixelView. Pot=F8ebuj=ED nov=FD I2C z=E1sobn= =EDk (p=F8=EDtomn=FD " "v j=E1rech 2.4). M=F9=BEete to z=EDskat na:" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/."; msgstr "http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/."; #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "" "gpio: TV cards from FlyVideo98, Avermedia, MiRO and many others. Needs btt= v " "version 0.7.45 or higher (present on 2.4 kernels). If you are using the " "bttv tarball, copy it to the kernel." msgstr "" "gpio: TV karty od FlyVideo98, Avermedia, MiRO a mnoha dal=B9=EDch. Pot=F8e= buj=ED bttv " "verze 0.7.45 nebo vy=B9=B9=ED (p=F8=EDtomn=FD v j=E1rech 2.4). Pokud pou= =BE=EDv=E1te bttv z tar " "arch=EDvu, nakop=EDrujte ho do j=E1dra." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-so
Processed: unable to reproduce
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 269668 +unreproducible Bug#269668: rdiff-backup crashes trying to backup to NFS directory Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
