Your message dated Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:28:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing case (was Re: More information)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2004 22:00:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 06 15:00:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from de46d.ipsec0.torres.ka0.zugschlus.de (torres.ka0.zugschlus.de)
[212.126.222.70] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BX5h7-00043Y-00; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 15:00:45 -0700
Received: from janeway.int.ka0.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.31]:33038)
by torres.ka0.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (Debian package
4.34-0+1zg1))
id 1BX5h5-0002Lf-Sm; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:00:43 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rdiff-backup: reports unchanged files as changed
Bcc: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:00:41 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.4-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
rdiff-backup seems to report unchanged files as changed:
rdiff-backup --exclude-filelist-stdin --print-statistics --verbosity 5
--force --remote-schema 'ssh -C -l admin -o "userknownhostsfile
../host-key" -i ./ssh-key %s sudo
rdiff-backup --server' remotehost::/ remotehost
<snip>
Starting mirror / to remotehost
Processing changed file .
Processing changed file bin
Processing changed file bin/gunzip
Processing changed file bin/gzip
Processing changed file bin/uncompress
Processing changed file bin/zcat
Strangely, this doesn't happen for every file on the system, but I can
confirm that neither gunzip, gzip, uncompress nor zcat have changed
since the last backup. A truckload of other files shows this behavior
as well.
Am I doing something wrong?
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-janeway
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii librsync1 0.9.6-8 Binary diff library based on the r
ii python2.3 2.3.4-1 An interactive high-level object-o
ii rdiff 0.9.6-8 Binary diff tool for signature-bas
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 253057-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2004 17:29:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 05 10:29:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rocksteady.bowdoin.edu (splinter) [139.140.34.45]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C40pn-0006WE-00; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 10:29:47 -0700
Received: by splinter (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id ABB3213F5; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:28:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:28:35 -0400
From: Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing case (was Re: More information)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 with kernel 2.6.7-1-686
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4
X-GPG-Key: http://www.thened.net/~alec/static/alec.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
begin quotation of Marc Haber on 2004-09-05 17:23:14 +0200:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:35:08AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > I will try to reproduce this in the next days and will answer the
> > question as soon as I have results.
>=20
> Tries to reproduce have been unsuccessful. The cause must have been
> something that is not present any more. Since unreproducible bugs are
> hard to fix, the bug can be closed.
That they are. Thanks for trying to reproduce this, and if it happens
again, definitely let me know.
Alec
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBO0zDAud/2YgchcQRAgQpAJ9fAPIK3ZMndTncaf/e2AlKblSuXwCfWy62
0xL+XpG4HhbxU//fNZj1AYE=
=6KN+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--
