Bug#232793: marked as done (Half-broken dependency on emacs20)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#232793: fixed in cedet 1:1.0beta3b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 03:10:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 14 19:10:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AsCg8-0004CP-00; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:10:44 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id DE4C564D3A; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:10:43 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 231B0FEF3; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:10:28 + (GMT) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:10:28 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Half-broken dependency on emacs20 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: speedbar Version: 0.13a-7 Severity: minor emacs20 has been removed from the archive a few weeks ago. You have a dependency entry which lists emacs20 as one alternative. Please remove emacs20 as an alternative to fulfil this dependency. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 232793-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 07:38:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 00:38:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BwyYV-RI-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:38:51 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BwyVo-0004QA-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:04 -0400 From: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#232793: fixed in cedet 1:1.0beta3b-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:04 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: cedet Source-Version: 1:1.0beta3b-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cedet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cedet-common_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet-common_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb cedet-contrib_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet-contrib_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb cedet_1.0beta3b-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet_1.0beta3b-1.diff.gz cedet_1.0beta3b-1.dsc to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet_1.0beta3b-1.dsc cedet_1.0beta3b.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet_1.0beta3b.orig.tar.gz cogre_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/cogre_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb ede_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/ede_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb eieio_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/eieio_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb semantic_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/semantic_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb speedbar-beta_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/speedbar-beta_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb speedbar_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/speedbar_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cedet package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:57:55 +0900 Source
Bug#232753: marked as done (Half-broken dependency on emacs20)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#232753: fixed in cedet 1:1.0beta3b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 02:53:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 14 18:53:46 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AsCPi-0003q2-00; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:53:46 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id D391664D3B; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:53:45 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EFF4DFEF3; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:53:19 + (GMT) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:53:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Half-broken dependency on emacs20 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: eieio Version: 0.17-3 Severity: minor emacs20 has been removed from the archive a few weeks ago. You have a dependency entry which lists emacs20 as one alternative. Please remove emacs20 as an alternative to fulfil this dependency. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 232753-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 07:38:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 00:38:50 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BwyYU-R5-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:38:50 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BwyVo-0004Q6-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:04 -0400 From: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#232753: fixed in cedet 1:1.0beta3b-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:04 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: cedet Source-Version: 1:1.0beta3b-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cedet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cedet-common_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet-common_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb cedet-contrib_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet-contrib_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb cedet_1.0beta3b-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet_1.0beta3b-1.diff.gz cedet_1.0beta3b-1.dsc to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet_1.0beta3b-1.dsc cedet_1.0beta3b.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cedet/cedet_1.0beta3b.orig.tar.gz cogre_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/cogre_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb ede_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/ede_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb eieio_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/eieio_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb semantic_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/semantic_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb speedbar-beta_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/speedbar-beta_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb speedbar_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/cedet/speedbar_1.0beta3b-1_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cedet package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:57:55 +0900 Source: ce
Bug#178893: marked as done (gnucash: Documentation should be in, or linked to, /usr/share/doc/gnucash)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:51:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line No longer spread though the filesystem. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2003 10:24:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 29 04:24:55 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18dpOp-0008UF-00; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 04:24:55 -0600 Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18dpOo-0006kP-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:24:54 +0100 Received: from [131.152.17.45] (helo=pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18dpOn-00010n-00; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:24:53 +0100 Received: from frank by pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18dp9U-p9-00; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:09:04 +0100 From: "Frank Küster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnucash: Documentation should be in, or linked to, /usr/share/doc/gnucash X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:09:04 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: gnucash Version: 1.6.6-1 Severity: normal After installing gnucash on woody, in /usr/share/doc/gnucash there's only the mandatory Debian files and a directory with french html-documentation. The rest of the documentation is spread throughout the file system: The original README files are in /usr/share/gnucash/doc, the french docs are copied in /usr/share/gnucash/html, and other languages are in /usr/share/gnome/help/gnucash/. Since I usually do not use gnome, I don't know wether that's the usual gnome way - but at least there should be links to /usr/share/doc/gnucash. Bye, Frank -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pc201-37 2.4.19 #1 Fre Dez 20 15:50:11 CET 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages gnucash depends on: ii bonobo1.0.20-1 The GNOME Bonobo System. ii gdk-imlib11.9.14-2 Gdk-Imlib is an imaging library fo ii guile1.4 1:1.4-24 The GNU extension language and Sch ii guile1.4-slib 1:1.4-24 SLIB support for guile1.4 and libg ii libart2 1.4.1.4-3 The Gnome canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile0 0.2.3-4The Audiofile Library ii libbonobo21.0.20-1 The GNOME Bonobo library. ii libc6 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdate-manip-perl5.40-1 a perl library for manipulating da ii libdb33.2.9-16 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd0 0.2.23-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfinance-quote-perl 1.06-2 Perl module for retrieving stock q ii libfreetype6 2.0.9-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgal19 0.19.2-2 G App Libs (run time library) ii libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 0.17.0-2 The GNOME Canvas pixbuf library ii libgdk-pixbuf20.17.0-2 The GdkPixBuf library. ii libghttp1 1.0.9-9Gnome HTTP client library ii libglade-gnome0 1:0.17-2.2 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglade0 1:0.17-2.2 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib1.21.2.10-4 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome321.4.1.4-3 The Gnome libraries ii libgnomeprint15 0.35-4 The GNOME Print architecture - run ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.1.4-3 The Gnome libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.1.4-3 The Gnome libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-11 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libgtkhtml20 1.0.2-1HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libguile9 1:1.4-24 libraries for Guile1.4 (guile, gui ii libguppi160.40.3-1 GN
Bug#194857: marked as done (gnucash: Segfault on Startup)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:53:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing now. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2003 08:48:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 27 03:47:05 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from defiant.noxa.de [212.60.197.41] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19Ka6p-0006PT-00; Tue, 27 May 2003 03:47:03 -0500 Received: (qmail 20917 invoked from network); 27 May 2003 08:45:22 - Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by localhost with SMTP; 27 May 2003 08:45:22 - Received: from fd by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19Ka77-00049J-00; Tue, 27 May 2003 10:47:21 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Florian Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnucash: Segfault on Startup X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 10:47:21 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gnucash Version: 1.8.3-3 Severity: normal Segmentation fault on gnucash startup. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux riogrande 2.4.20-ben10 #6 Wed May 21 09:51:42 CEST 2003 ppc Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages gnucash depends on: ii bonobo1.0.22-2.1 The GNOME Bonobo System. ii gdk-imlib11.9.14-13 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii guile-1.6-libs1.6.4-2Main Guile libraries ii guile-1.6-slib1.6.4-2Guile SLIB support ii libart2 1.4.2-13 The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile0 0.2.3-4The Audiofile Library ii libbonobo21.0.22-2.1 The GNOME Bonobo library. ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdate-manip-perl5.40-1 a perl library for manipulating da ii libdb33.2.9-18 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd0 0.2.29-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfinance-quote-perl 1.07-2 Perl module for retrieving stock q ii libfreetype6 2.1.4-2FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgal23 0.24-1.3 G App Libs (run time library) ii libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 0.22.0-2 The GNOME1 Canvas pixbuf library ii libgdk-pixbuf20.22.0-2 The GdkPixBuf image library, gtk+ ii libghttp1 1.0.9-9Gnome HTTP client library ii libglade-gnome0 1:0.17-2.7 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglade0 1:0.17-2.7 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib1.21.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome321.4.2-13 The GNOME libraries ii libgnomeprint15 0.37-3 The GNOME Print architecture - run ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-13 The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-13 The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-14 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libgtkhtml20 1.0.4-5.1 HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.4-2Guile's patched version of libtool ii libguppi160.40.3-6 GNOME graph and plot component ii libgwrapguile11.3.4-8g-wrap: Tool for exporting C libra ii libltdl3 1.4.3-9A system independent dlopen wrappe ii liboaf0 0.6.10-3 The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii libofx0c102 0.6.4-2library to support Open Financial ii liborbit0 0.5.17-9 Libraries for ORBit - a CORBA ORB ii libpopt0 1.6.4-2lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libstdc++51:3.3-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxml1
Processing of mmake_2.2.1-4_i386.changes
mmake_2.2.1-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Bug#216534: marked as done (mmake: dependency on essential package)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#216534: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2003 14:15:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 19 09:15:57 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ABELd-0007Km-00; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 09:15:57 -0500 Received: (qmail 23927 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2003 14:15:56 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 19 Oct 2003 14:15:56 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ABEL9-00010A-00; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:15:27 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mmake: dependency on essential package X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:15:27 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_18 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_18 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: mmake Version: 2.2.1-2 Severity: normal mmake has an unversioned dependency on the essential findutils package. Section 3.5. of your policy says: <-- snip --> ... Packages are not required to declare any dependencies they have on other packages which are marked `Essential' (see below), and should not do so unless they depend on a particular version of that package. ... <-- snip --> BTW: lintian gives an error message for this issue. --- Received: (at 216534-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 08:54:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 01:54:03 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BwzjH-xN-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 01:54:03 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bwzcl-0002Ut-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#216534: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: mmake Source-Version: 2.2.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mmake, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mmake package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:43:19 +0200 Source: mmake Binary: mmake Architecture: source all Version: 2.2.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: mmake - Makefile generator for Java programs Closes: 199875 216534 255955 Changes: mmake (2.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Made depends on findutils versioned, closes:
Bug#199875: marked as done (Allow output to a filename other than 'Makefile')
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#199875: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2003 15:26:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 03 10:25:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Y5xw-9w-00; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 10:25:44 -0500
Received: from marvin.weston.athenium.com
(h00034795fb2d.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.91.103.187](untrusted sender))
by attbi.com (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
id <2003070315254301400f9c68e>; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:25:43 +
Received: from there.weston.athenium.com ([192.168.1.162])
by marvin.weston.athenium.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19Y5xu-0007ue-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 11:25:42 -0400
Received: from mdz by there.weston.athenium.com with local (Exim 4.20)
id 19Y5xu-rO-MV
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 11:25:42 -0400
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:25:42 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Allow output to a filename other than 'Makefile'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.18
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: mmake
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I want to integrate mmake with an existing build system, and so I don't want
it to overwrite my Makefile.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux there 2.4.20-3-686 #1 Sat Jun 7 22:34:55 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set)
Versions of packages mmake depends on:
ii findutils 4.1.7-2.1 utilities for finding files--find,
ii java-common 0.20 Base of all Java packages
ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
--
- mdz
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mmake-output-file.diff"
--- /usr/bin/mmake 2002-02-13 09:15:59.0 -0500
+++ mmake 2003-07-03 11:24:38.0 -0400
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
=cut
use strict;
-use vars qw($opt_d $opt_v);
+use vars qw($opt_d $opt_v $opt_o);
use Getopt::Std;
require 5.000; # Need this perl version at least
@@ -235,13 +235,16 @@
my $toplevel= ""; # Defined if toplevel java files
# Parse command line options
-getopts("dv") || die "Usage: $PROG [ -d | -v ]\n";
+getopts("dvo:") || die "Usage: $PROG [ -d | -v ]\n";
if ( defined $opt_v ) {
print "This is mmake, version $VERSION\n";
exit(0);
}
+if ( defined $opt_o ) {
+ $M = $opt_o;
+}
# -
# Assign macro defaults
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
---
Received: (at 199875-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 08:54:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 01:54:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BwzjH-xb-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 01:54:03 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bwzcl-0002Ur-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#199875: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_
Bug#255955: marked as done (mmake does not include a copyright file that actually includes the copyright of mmake)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255955: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2004 23:14:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 23 16:14:48 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sentinel.ucr.edu [138.23.226.228] (mirapoint) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BdGx6-0002Uw-00; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:14:48 -0700 Received: from archimedes.ucr.edu (archimedes.ucr.edu [138.23.92.79]) by sentinel.ucr.edu (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with SMTP id AZS90969 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 27499 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:12:12 - Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:12:12 -0700 From: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mmake does not include a copyright file that actually includes the copyright of mmake Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: mmake Severity: important Version: 2.2.1-2 The following copryight statement does not include the copyright and licensing terms of mmake: Upstream Author(s): Jan-Henrik Haukeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Copyright: GNU GPL. Debian GNU/Linux users may find the GPL in /usr/doc/copyright/G= PL. Specifically, you need to include verbiage from the package like the following: This module is part of foo, and is released under the terms of the GPL version 2, or any later version, at your option. See the file README and COPYING for more information. Copyright 2004 by Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Don Armstrong --=20 "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA2g5MgcCJIoCND9ARAgffAJ4m7Sg5ekwb4LqudfaWNUiRSKyzFQCfWuk7 jH9wbHj9PHjloMw/BOtkxNY= =mx0w -END PGP SIGNATURE- --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1-- --- Received: (at 255955-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 08:54:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 01:54:22 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BwzjZ-yc-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 01:54:21 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bwzcl-0002Uv-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#255955: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: mmake Source-Version: 2.2.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mmake, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb A summary o
mmake_2.2.1-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 199875 216534 255955 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processed: reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 255955 Bug#255955: mmake does not include a copyright file that actually includes the copyright of mmake Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#255955: reopen
reopen 255955 thanks This bug still exists; merely creating a copyright file doesn't do it. The package is not properly licensed under the GPL, and until we get clarification from upstream, we can't budge on release of it; and we must drop it from Debian if we don't hear at all. I'm tracking this bug, and Ola Lundqvist should not have closed the bug. Please don't close it without discussing with me. Thomas
Bug#255955: Clarification of
Jan-Henrik: I'm e-mailing you to see if you would be willing to clean up the following problem with the licensing of mmail and mmake (and any other packages) that you've intended to license under the GPL, but didn't make it perfectly clear. If you would be willing to okay the second copyright statement for use in mmake and mmail, that would be ideal. Alternatively, if you could extract the same language from the GPL section: licensing your work under the GPL, and respond to this bug, that would work as well. To clarify, since Thomas's first message sounded like he was talking about mmail only (not just mmake), the second issue is that the copyright statement doesn't actually license the work under the GPL, even though this is pretty clearly what the author intended. My original bug was that debian/copyright didn't actually include the following (I was auditing packages for something wolse when I ran across this.) COPYRIGHT GNUGPL (c) 1998-2001 Jan-Henrik Haukeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Redistribution and use with or without modification, are permitted provided that the above copyright notice can be reproduced. Please see the enclosed GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE file for complete details. The above should read something like the following: Copyright 1998-2001 Jan-Henrik Haukeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This file is part of mmake, and is released under the terms of the GPL version 2, or any later version, at your option. See the file README and COPYING for more information. if this is actually licensed under the GPL. As always, if there are any questions, or anything I can do to help, don't hesitate to ask. Don Armstrong -- The sheer ponderousness of the panel's opinion ... refutes its thesis far more convincingly than anything I might say. The panel's labored effort to smother the Second Amendment by sheer body weight has all the grace of a sumo wrestler trying to kill a rattlesnake by sitting on it--and is just as likely to succeed. -- Alex Kozinski in Silveira V Lockyer http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Bug#220093: marked as done (39 packages unnecessarily still use "Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org")
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220093: fixed in varmon 1.0.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2003 23:59:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 09 17:59:50 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AIzTC-em-00; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 17:59:50 -0600 Received: from tc218-187-82-90.2-7.pl.apol.com.tw ([218.187.82.90]:34103 helo=jidanni.org) by frodo.hserus.net with asmtp (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.24 #3) id 1AIzTA-000NEt-NL by authid with plain for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 05:29:49 +0530 Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AIzIN-v5-J3; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:48:39 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: 39 packages unnecessarily still use "Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org" X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:48:39 +0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: minor 39 packages seem to still use an old Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org when this is the default already. Please perhaps reassign this bug to maybe each package involved? $ grep-available -F Bugs -s Bugs .|sort|uniq -c 21 Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org 18 Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org/ $ grep-available -F Bugs -s Package -n .|sort clanlib-doc clanlib-examples dpkg dpkg-dev dpkg-doc dselect fbgetty gtk-engines-eazel innovation3d innovation3d-dev ipsec-tools john libbsd-resource-perl libcgi-ssi-perl libclan2-gl libclan2-gui libclan2-jpeg libclan2-lua libclan2-mikmod libclan2-network libclan2-png libclan2-sound libclan2-ttf libclan2-vorbis libclanlib-dev libclanlib2 libowfat-dev lire modutils pinfo slidentd tinycdb varmon xfonts-biznet-100dpi xfonts-biznet-75dpi xfonts-biznet-base xfonts-biznet-iso-8859-2-100dpi xfonts-biznet-iso-8859-2-75dpi xfonts-biznet-iso-8859-2-base --- Received: (at 220093-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 11:34:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 04:34:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bx2Et-0005cb-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:34:51 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bx2CO-0006NE-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:16 -0400 From: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#220093: fixed in varmon 1.0.2-5 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:16 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: varmon Source-Version: 1.0.2-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of varmon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: varmon_1.0.2-5.diff.gz to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-5.diff.gz varmon_1.0.2-5.dsc to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-5.dsc varmon_1.0.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated varmon package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL
Bug#225765: marked as done (varmon doesn't work with devfs)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225765: fixed in varmon 1.0.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2004 16:48:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 01 10:48:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail012.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.66]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ac5LP-0002WZ-00; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 10:06:43 -0600
Received: from tropism.intranet.froob.net
(c211-30-33-252.mirnd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.33.252])
by mail012.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
i01G6fo02516
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 03:06:41 +1100
Received: from tropism.intranet.froob.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by tropism.intranet.froob.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id
i01G6Yi4000538;
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 03:06:37 +1100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by tropism.intranet.froob.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id
i01EBIiT020018;
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 01:11:18 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Pete de Zwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: varmon doesn't work with devfs
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 01:11:18 +1100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level:
Package: varmon
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: important
varmon doesn't work with devfs as it attempts to open a device name that
doesn't exist. Here is a munged snipped of output with strace info:
Scanning for VA safety backplane.
open("/dev/rd/c0d0", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
Please wait a few moments...Unable to open device (No such file or directory)
Once the symlink is made, varmon is happy and works.
However, varmon should open /dev/rd/disc0/disc rather then /dev/rd/c0d0
Regards,
Pete de Zwart.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tropism 2.4.23 #1 SMP Sun Nov 30 11:03:49 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages varmon depends on:
ii libc62.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand
---
Received: (at 225765-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 11:34:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 04:34:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bx2Eu-0005co-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:34:52 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bx2CO-0006NG-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:16 -0400
From: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#225765: fixed in varmon 1.0.2-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:16 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: varmon
Source-Version: 1.0.2-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
varmon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
varmon_1.0.2-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-5.diff.gz
varmon_1.0.2-5.dsc
to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-5.dsc
varmon_1.0.2-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier o
Bug#266285: elza: README.Debian suggests 'libnet-socks-perl' which is not in sid
Package: elza Version: 1.4.3-5 Severity: minor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/elza$ grep libnet README.Debian * libnet-socks-perl is required for SOCKS proxy support libnet-socks-perl is not in sid. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE Versions of packages elza depends on: ii perl 5.8.4-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information
Processing of gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.changes
gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gtktalog_1.0.4-2.dsc gtktalog_1.0.4-2.diff.gz gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gtktalog_1.0.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-2.diff.gz gtktalog_1.0.4-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-2.dsc gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#266329: asks at high priority about configuring, but follows with medium proority questions
Package: atftpd Version: 0.6.3 Severity: normal The debconf config script asks at high priority whether to configure atftpd with debconf. If you choose to do so, it asks all the config questions at medium priority. The result is that if it's installed at high priority, it asks if you want to configure it, and then doesn't let you. I think it would be better not to ask the high priority question at all, and always configure it, if the user's debconf priority is set to allow it. That's what debconf priority levels are for, to control what level of configuration you want to do. There's no need for atftpd to ask about that. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages atftpd depends on: ii debconf 1.4.31 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libwrap07.6.dbs-5Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netkit-inetd0.10-9 The Internet Superserver -- debconf information excluded -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: severity of 224137 is critical
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.1 > severity 224137 critical Bug#224137: varmon: Fails to run with 2.6.0-test11 Severity set to `critical'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: tagging 224137
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.1 > tags 224137 help Bug#224137: varmon: Fails to run with 2.6.0-test11 There were no tags set. Tags added: help > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#255955: Accepted mmake 2.2.1-4 (all source)
Hello On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:56:56AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > reopen 255955 > thanks > > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Description: > > mmake - Makefile generator for Java programs > > Closes: 199875 216534 255955 > > Changes: > > mmake (2.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* Updated copyright file so it include GPL in a correct way, closes: > > #255955. > > This is seriously wrong. Did you read the history of bug 255955 > before closing this? > > Where did you get a proper reference to the GPL from? Upstream has > not actually licensed the program under the GPL. I have asked > upstream to clarify, and if we don't get a reply, the package must be > removed from Debian. Certainly the RC bug must be left open. This > package cannot go into release without a proper license. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/debian/_qa/mmake-2.2.1$ ls -l GNUGPL.TXT LICENSE -rw-r--r-- 1 ola ola 14822 2001-02-12 23:42 GNUGPL.TXT -rw-r--r-- 1 ola ola 280 2001-02-12 23:42 LICENSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/debian/_qa/mmake-2.2.1$ My reference comes from that GNUGPL.TXT in the source. The LICENSE file is a bit short but the GNUGPL.TXT file covers everything just as it should. It just has an uncommon name, that is all. I can not see anything wrong with this. If you read the debian copyright file, you can see that I refer to that file instead of the file LICENSE. Or do you still think I did something wrong here? Regards, // Ola > Thomas -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---
Bug#211307: marked as done (libapache-mod-fastcgi: request; build for apache2)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Aug 2004 03:59:47 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done by myself. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2003 22:42:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 16 17:42:47 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 229.9.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (tempest.nemui.org) [219.111.9.229] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19zOX0-00015Q-00; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:42:47 -0500 Received: (qmail 7318 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 07:42:44 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO tempest.nemui.org) (192.168.51.1) by tempest.private.nemui.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 07:42:44 +0900 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:42:44 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libapache-mod-fastcgi: request; build for apache2 X-Debbugs-CC: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.3 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Face: %#SbsX5Ajq`)JKPGXyq8Cn6"<`&M~n\?,}`vYU7[}gM!q_K=\v6[}y8&R:Dy3O0Ymmw$@>T $Ys$^Tw8ghB'uxX)I(n_x\5RQ|s'D0m$,"I^\S X-GPG-Fingerprint: C4BC EDCC 50B2 2D7B 4A85 4A13 6CAD 85CE 4502 FDC2 X-Public-Key: http://pgp.nic.ad.jp:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4502FDC2 X-GPG-KeyID: 4502FDC2 X-Moe: Vampire/lilith MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_ORBS version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libapache-mod-fastcgi Version: 2.4.0-2 Severity: wishlist Please build module for apache2, too. Regards, -- Tatsuki Sugiura mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 211307-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 18:59:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 11:59:50 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 229.9.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (tempest.nemui.org) [219.111.9.229] (foobar) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bx9BV-0007Jx-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:59:50 -0700 Received: (qmail 27516 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 03:59:48 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO tempest.nemui.org) (192.168.51.1) by tempest.private.nemui.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 03:59:48 +0900 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 03:59:47 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: done by myself. User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Face: %#SbsX5Ajq`)JKPGXyq8Cn6"<`&M~n\?,}`vYU7[}gM!q_K=\v6[}y8&R:Dy3O0Ymmw$@>T $Ys$^Tw8ghB'uxX)I(n_x\5RQ|s'D0m$,"I^\S X-GPG-Fingerprint: C4BC EDCC 50B2 2D7B 4A85 4A13 6CAD 85CE 4502 FDC2 X-Public-Key: http://pgp.nic.ad.jp:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4502FDC2 X-GPG-KeyID: 4502FDC2 X-Moe: Vampire/lilith MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: I took over this package. Dnd done it. -- Tatsuki Sugiura mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheapest Ph@rmacy Here nBMN
Packages The Best 0n|ine Phar-macy is here. Why pay m0re when you can enjoy at a specia| disc0unt? -Cia|is -Via-gra -Vi0xx -S0ma and many many more! Visit Us t0day! http://www.worldwidemedstoday.com?wid=18 This 0ne-time mai-|ing. N0 re m0val are requ|red H[20
Bug#255955: Clarification of
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My original bug was that debian/copyright didn't actually include the > following (I was auditing packages for something wolse when I ran > across this.) > >COPYRIGHT GNUGPL (c) 1998-2001 Jan-Henrik Haukeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Redistribution and use with or without modification, are permitted >provided that the above copyright notice can be reproduced. Please see >the enclosed GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE file for complete details. > > The above should read something like the following: > >Copyright 1998-2001 Jan-Henrik Haukeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >This file is part of mmake, and is released under the terms of the >GPL version 2, or any later version, at your option. See the file >README and COPYING for more information. > > if this is actually licensed under the GPL. Oh, and what is particularly important: the license needs to be very clear just what files it applies to. The normal way to do that is to put this text at the front of every file, right next to the copyright notice. Or, if it is carried in a different file, then that file needs to name or otherwise identify exactly which files are covered by the license. Thomas
Bug#246486: attempts to fix
It turns out that fixing this bug is not trivial; it is merely one of a whole host of problems that are caused because apparently swig has changed its interface in a variety of ways. Adapting to the changes seems easy on the assumption that you understand swig, but I don't. Perhaps version 2.0.1 (see bug 173384) solves the problems. Since version 2.1 is not free at all, perhaps the best thing to do is to drop roleplaying from Debian entirely. Thomas
Gay Chat Subscription
This email has been sent to confirm that [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been subscribed to UK GAY CHAT. Soon you will receive messages and pictures from other users and can even get kinky using your microphone and webcam! We hope you enjoy this exciting new service. To unsubscribe, at any time, please call 0795 837 3420
Bug#249777: marked as done (semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring)
Your message dated 17 Aug 2004 17:19:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line unreproducable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2004 07:19:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 19 00:19:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lns-vlq-11-62-147-176-169.adsl.proxad.net (jophur) [62.147.176.169] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BQLMm-VP-00; Wed, 19 May 2004 00:19:52 -0700 Received: from bonnaud by jophur with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BQLMk-JU-3P; Wed, 19 May 2004 09:19:50 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59 Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:19:48 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: semi Version: 1.14.6+0.20040 Severity: grave Hi, the last upgrade of the gnus-bonus-el package failed: Setting up gnus-bonus-el (24.5-1) ... install/gnus-bonus-el: Handling emacs20, logged in /tmp/elc_3m8rRt.log emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/gnus-bonus-el emacs20 emacs20 emacs21 xemacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, line 1. dpkg: error processing gnus-bonus-el (--configure): The cause of the problem seems to be the semi package. After purging semi, gnus-bonus-el postinst does not fail any more. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 249777-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 00:19:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 17:19:43 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BxEB5-0006r5-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:19:43 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BxEB5-0001EI-2o for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:19:43 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unreproducable X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: Flakey and built to stay that way. From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 17 Aug 2004 17:19:43 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: I'm closing this bug because attempts by others to reproduce it have failed entirely, and there have been more recent releases which may well have fixed the problem, and the submitter has not replied to a request to verify if the bug still occurs. Thomas
Processing of gwrapguile_1.3.4-12_powerpc.changes
gwrapguile_1.3.4-12_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.dsc gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.diff.gz libgwrapguile1_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb libgwrapguile-dev_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Processing of libofx_0.6.6-2_powerpc.changes
libofx_0.6.6-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libofx_0.6.6-2.dsc libofx_0.6.6-2.diff.gz libofx0c102_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb libofx-dev_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
gwrapguile_1.3.4-12_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gwrapguile/gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.diff.gz gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.dsc to pool/main/g/gwrapguile/gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.dsc libgwrapguile-dev_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gwrapguile/libgwrapguile-dev_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb libgwrapguile1_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gwrapguile/libgwrapguile1_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
libofx_0.6.6-2_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libofx-dev_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx-dev_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb libofx0c102_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx0c102_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb libofx_0.6.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx_0.6.6-2.diff.gz libofx_0.6.6-2.dsc to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx_0.6.6-2.dsc Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
