Bug#188230: marked as done (bug in xtrlock)
Your message dated 07 Aug 2004 22:04:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug in xtrlock
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2003 17:57:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 08 12:57:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail1.centrum.cz [62.84.131.173]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 192xLe-0006uO-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 12:57:31 -0500
Received: by mail.centrum.cz id ;
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:56:30 +0200
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 19:56:30 +0200
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Centrum Mail 1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
Subject: bug in xtrlock
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,
SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,SUPERLONG_LINE
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xtrlock
Version: 2.0
When the screen is locked and you write a "bit more" characters (e.g. by
holding some key for about 2 minutes) and press Enter after that, xtrlock
crashes hence the screen is unlocked now.
I thing the problem is in rlen, that is increased on any keypress and after LF
is to rbuf[rlen] written 0. But rlen can be real great number at this moment
and rbuf[rlen] can point to part of memory we hadn't access ..
Following patch should fix the bug:
BEGINING OF THE PATCH
--- xtrlock.c 1997-10-22 12:32:28.0 +0200
+++ xtrlock.c 2003-04-08 19:41:12.0 +0200
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * .. overflow bug patched by srakyi (http://srakyi.modry.cz) - no warranty
+ *
*/
#include
@@ -191,8 +194,10 @@
break;
default:
if (clen != 1) break;
-if (rlen < sizeof(rbuf)) rbuf[rlen]= cbuf[0];
-rlen++;
+if (rlen < sizeof(rbuf)) {
+ rbuf[rlen]= cbuf[0];
+ rlen++;
+ }
break;
}
break;
END OF THE PATCH
---
Received: (at 188230-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 05:04:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 07 22:04:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Btfr1-00032A-00; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 22:04:19 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Btfr1-0001Oa-1l; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 22:04:19 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug in xtrlock
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Tom-Swiftie: "I just sharpened my pencil," Tom said pointedly
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07 Aug 2004 22:04:19 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 5
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This bug was fixed in version 2.0-6.1 of xtrlock.
Thomas
Processed: can't be replicated
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 249777 + unreproducible Bug#249777: semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#249777: semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring
I have just done the following with no problems: # apt-get remove gnus-bonus-el gnus # apt-get install semi wl t-gnus # apt-get install gnus-bonus-el with no errors at all. Perhaps this was fixed in a release after the one you have installed (which appears to be 1.14.6+0.20040). Can you try with a more recent version of the package and tell me if you still see the bug? Thomas (for the Debian QA team)
Bug#246486: Debian roleplaying package
Are you still planning to take over maintenance of the Debian "roleplaying" package? On May 25 you said you were planning to start working on it. If you no longer intend to adopt the package, please change its status back to orphaned (I would be happy to do that for you if you like). If you do still intend to adopt it, do you mind if I do a QA upload to clear the existing release-critical bug (#246486)? Please let me know. Thomas (for the Debian QA team)
Bug#261285: Czech translation for lirc (corrected)
Hi, this version contains corrected czech messages for lirc. Regards Miroslav Jezbera # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to #this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # #Some information specific to po-debconf are available at #/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # #Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: lirc\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-02-11 10:27-0800\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2004-07-21 15:00+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Miroslav Jezbera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Czech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "Select drivers to build." msgstr "Vyberte, které ovladače přeložit." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "" "i2c: TV cards from Hauppauge and PixelView. Needs the new I2C stack (present " "on 2.4 kernels). You can get it at:" msgstr "" "i2x: TV karty od Hauppauge a PixelView. Potřebují nový I2C zásobník (přítomný " "v járech 2.4). Můžete to získat na:" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/."; msgstr "http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/."; #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "" "gpio: TV cards from FlyVideo98, Avermedia, MiRO and many others. Needs bttv " "version 0.7.45 or higher (present on 2.4 kernels). If you are using the " "bttv tarball, copy it to the kernel." msgstr "" "gpio: TV karty od FlyVideo98, Avermedia, MiRO a mnoha dalších. Potřebují bttv " "verze 0.7.45 nebo vyšší (přítomný v járech 2.4). Pokud používáte bttv z tar " "archívu, nakopírujte ho do jádra." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "parallel: Custom parallel-port receiver." msgstr "parallel: Vlastní přijímač na paralelním portu." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "serial: Serial-port driver." msgstr "serial: Ovladač pro sériový port." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "sir: Serial InfraRed (IRDA)." msgstr "sir: Sériový infračervený port (IRDA)" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "it87: ITE IT8705 and IT8712 CIR ports (e.g. on the ECS K7S5A)." msgstr "it87: ITE IT8705 a IT8712 CIR porty (například na ECS K7S5A)." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:5 msgid "bt829: Tekram M230 Mach64" msgstr "bt829: Tekram M230 Mach64" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:28 msgid "Should I try to automagically select support for your hardware?" msgstr "Mám se pokusit automaticky zvolit podporu pro váš hardware?" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:28 msgid "" "You have installed and configured LIRC. I can try to guess what kernel " "modules are needed and their parameters from your previous answers." msgstr "" "Nainstalovali jste a nastavili jste LIRC. Můžu se pokusit odhadnout jaké " "jaderné moduly jsou potřeba a jaké mají být jejich parametry z vašich " "předchozích odpovědí." #. Type: note #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:34 msgid "You don't need any aditional kernel modules." msgstr "Nepotřebujete žádné další jaderné moduly." #. Type: note #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:34 msgid "" "Unless you want to build LIRC kernel modules for some other system, you can " "probably remove this package." msgstr "" "Pokud nechcete vytvářet jadrené moduly pro nějaký jiný systém, můžete " "pravděpodobně odebrat tento balík." #. Type: note #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:40 msgid "How to build the binary modules package." msgstr "Jak vytvořit balík s binárními moduly." #. Type: note #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:40 msgid "" "For instruction on how to build the binary modules debian package read: /usr/" "share/doc/lirc-modules-source/README.Debian" msgstr "" "Pro návod jak vytvořit debianovký balík s binárními moduly čtěte: /usr/share/" "doc/lirc-modules-source/README.Debian" #. Type: note #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:40 msgid "Quick walktrough:" msgstr "Krátký návod:" #. Type: note #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:40 msgid "cd /usr/src/" msgstr "cd /usr/src/" #. Type: note #. Description #: ../lirc-modules-source.templates:40 msgid "tar -xzf lirc-modules.tar.gz" msgstr "tar -xzf li
bblaunch segfault patch
Hi,
I've no idea to whom I should send this patch nor the procedure for doing so,
but when I compiled
bblaunch on Red Hat 8, it ran fine, but on Fedora Core 2, it kept segfaulting
(no core dump).
I tracked down the problem to a bad cast and, as it turns out, the variable in
question wasn't
even being used. I deleted the line and everything works just fine. Patch is
below my signoff.
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Only in bblaunch-0.0.3: bblaunch
diff -u bblaunch-0.0.3.orig/bblaunch.c bblaunch-0.0.3/bblaunch.c
--- bblaunch-0.0.3.orig/bblaunch.c 2004-08-08 10:14:14.560014872 -0700
+++ bblaunch-0.0.3/bblaunch.c 2004-08-08 10:15:09.425674024 -0700
@@ -170,8 +170,6 @@
launchargs.iconic = False;
launchargs.pause = 1000;
- sprintf(launchargs.call, "%s", (char *)atoi(argv[0]));
-
i = 1;
valargs = 1;
while ((i < argc) && valargs) {
diff -u bblaunch-0.0.3.orig/bblaunch.h bblaunch-0.0.3/bblaunch.h
--- bblaunch-0.0.3.orig/bblaunch.h 2004-08-08 10:14:14.560014872 -0700
+++ bblaunch-0.0.3/bblaunch.h 2004-08-08 10:15:16.908536456 -0700
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
typedef struct LArgs
{
-char call[1024];
char command[1024];
unsigned long flags, attrib, workspace, stack, decoration;
unsigned long pause;
Only in bblaunch-0.0.3: bblaunch.o
Only in bblaunch-0.0.3: config.cache
Only in bblaunch-0.0.3: config.log
Only in bblaunch-0.0.3: config.status
Only in bblaunch-0.0.3: Makefile
=
Silence is Evil
http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/philosophy/indexdecency.htm
Ovid http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=17000
Web Programming with Perl http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Bug#105554: marked as done ([hurd] doesn't build)
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 15:13:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2001 22:32:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 17:32:53 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (ulysses.g10code.de) [:::212.23.136.22]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15MGv6-0001bN-00; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:32:53 -0500
Received: from marcus by ulysses.g10code.de with local (Exim 3.16 #3 (Debian))
id 15MGuu-000AGh-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:32:40 +0200
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:32:37 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hurd] doesn't build
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libarr
Version: 0.1-47
Severity: important
Howdy,
here is the port of libarr to the Hurd. The Hurd returns i386-AT386
on uname -m, which is not a valid cpp symbol, which causes the
-Di386-AT386 to trigger an error message: The compilation will fail.
Instead fixing the generation of the $(ARCH) symbol, I threw out the whole
code related to it. It must break here and there. Every system which is
worth its name has some standard identifiers in the gcc specs file
(check yourself with gcc -E -dM -, CTRL-D). Those are to be used.
For something more fancy, one should use autoconf (config.guess, etc).
With the below patch, libarr compiles fine on the Hurd.
My patch also removes the vague attempt to define i386 on i386 portable
systems. First, this feature isn't needed anywhere, and second, it is better
left to the day when it is required to decide what is the best way to handle
it.
Thanks,
Marcus
diff -ru libarr-0.1.old/Makefile.incl libarr-0.1/Makefile.incl
--- libarr-0.1.old/Makefile.inclSat Aug 26 02:20:17 2000
+++ libarr-0.1/Makefile.inclTue Jul 17 00:18:51 2001
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
CC ?= gcc # ANSI-compatible C compiler
CFLAGS ?= -O2 -pipe -g3
CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer -fexpensive-optimizations -I$(TREE)/include
-CFLAGS += -Wall -D$(ARCH) -D_$(SYSTEM)_
+CFLAGS += -Wall
LDFLAGS?= -rdynamic
SHARED = -shared
@@ -24,16 +24,3 @@
SED= `which sed`
-#
-# We need to know the architecture name here. We assume iN86 is i386,
-# as we don't support any extensions yet. Also, we want this to work on all
-# make(1) variants (BSD (!=), GNU ($shell), etc.):
-ARCH != uname -m | sed -e 's/i[0-9]86/i386/'
-ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m | sed -e 's/i[0-9]86/i386/')
-ARCH ?= `uname -m | sed -e 's/[0-9]86/i386'`
-
-#
-# Additionally, for portability sake, we want to know the system type:
-SYSTEM != uname -s
-SYSTEM ?= $(shell uname -s)
-SYSTEM ?= `uname -s`
diff -ru libarr-0.1.old/debpatch libarr-0.1/debpatch
--- libarr-0.1.old/debpatch Fri Jul 6 22:14:35 2001
+++ libarr-0.1/debpatch Tue Jul 17 00:21:28 2001
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#include
+#include
- #if defined(_Linux_)
+ #if defined(__linux__)
#include
--- source/printf.c.saveTue Jul 3 10:51:57 2001
+++ source/printf.c Tue Jul 3 10:52:24 2001
diff -ru libarr-0.1.old/include/types.h libarr-0.1/include/types.h
--- libarr-0.1.old/include/types.h Wed Nov 29 03:09:28 2000
+++ libarr-0.1/include/types.h Tue Jul 17 00:23:39 2001
@@ -17,14 +17,6 @@
/* XXX platform specific type definitions:
*/
-/* I don't think these are needed...they'll probably be gone soon
- * -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- */
-#if !defined(i386) && (defined(i486) || defined(i586) || defined(i686))
-#define i386
-#endif
-
-
typedef unsigned long ptr_size_t;
#undef NULL
diff -ru libarr-0.1.old/source/input.c libarr-0.1/source/input.c
--- libarr-0.1.old/source/input.c Fri Jul 6 22:14:46 2001
+++ libarr-0.1/source/input.c Tue Jul 17 00:21:51 2001
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
#include
#include
-#if defined(_Linux_)
+#if defined(__linux__)
#include
#endif
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
static struct termios orig_term;
static byte_t set_term;
-#if defined(_Linux_)
+#if defined(__linux__)
static struct kbentry orig_kbe;
static struct kbsentry orig_kbs;
static byte_t set_kb;
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
{
struct termios term;
-#if defined(_Linux_)
+#if defined(__linux__)
/* The keyboard remapping
Bug#195447: marked as done (libarr: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Varargs problems)
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 15:16:01 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line was accepted has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2003 17:20:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 30 12:20:03 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19LnXv-00079I-00; Fri, 30 May 2003 12:20:03 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19LnXu-00015q-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 May 2003 13:20:02 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19LnXu-0007rv-3g for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 May 2003 10:20:02 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libarr: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Varargs problems From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 10:20:01 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libarr Version: 0.1-49 Severity: serious >From my build log: ... cc -O2 -pipe -g3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fexpensive-optimizations -I../include -Wall -c printf.c -o printf.o printf.c: In function `malloc_printf': printf.c:210: error: parse error before '...' token printf.c:215: error: parse error before "__builtin_va_start" printf.c:213: error: declaration for parameter `length' but no such parameter printf.c:215: error: number of arguments doesn't match prototype ../include/printf.h:18: error: prototype declaration make[2]: *** [printf.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libarr-0.1/source' make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libarr-0.1' touch build-stamp ... install -c -m 755 -o root source/libarr.so.0.1 /tmp/buildd/libarr-0.1/debian/tmp/usr/lib install: cannot stat `source/libarr.so.0.1': No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 195447-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 22:16:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 15:16:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtvxR-0005Bv-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:16:01 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BtvxR-0002FU-HZ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:16:01 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: was accepted X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Zippy-Says: You mean you don't want to watch WRESTLING from ATLANTA? From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Aug 2004 15:16:01 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Fix was accepted by maintainer when the maintainer became the QA group at version 0.1-50. Thomas
Bug#227387: marked as done ([installer@ftp-master.debian.org: libarr override disparity])
Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2004 18:32:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#227387: fixed in libarr 0.1-52 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 09:42:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 03:42:41 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from eth1859.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (centaur.hezmatt.org) [150.101.200.66] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AgAzO-00017O-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:56:55 -0600 Received: from [192.168.61.102] (helo=medusa.hezmatt.org) by centaur.hezmatt.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AgAzN-0006pG-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:56:53 +1100 Received: by medusa.hezmatt.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:56:48 +1100 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:56:48 +1100 From: Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: libarr override disparity] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 X-Spam-Level: Package: libarr Severity: minor Version: 0.1-50 - Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libarr override disparity Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:33:09 -0500 There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libarr-dev_0.1-50_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - End forwarded message - --- Received: (at 227387-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 22:38:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 15:38:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtwIk-0006mr-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:38:02 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtwCw-0006L8-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 18:32:02 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#227387: fixed in libarr 0.1-52 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 18:32:02 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: libarr Source-Version: 0.1-52 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libarr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libarr-dev_0.1-52_powerpc.deb to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr-dev_0.1-52_powerpc.deb libarr0_0.1-52_powerpc.deb to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr0_0.1-52_powerpc.deb libarr_0.1-52.dsc to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr_0.1-52.dsc libarr_0.1-52.tar.gz to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr_0.1-52.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If
Bug#127923: marked as done (libctk3-dev appears to depend on libctk-dev)
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 15:30:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libctk3-dev appears to depend on libctk-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2002 17:05:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 05 11:05:29 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from i208-161.nv.iinet.net.au (wibble) [203.59.208.161] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16MuG7-0007lC-00; Sat, 05 Jan 2002 11:05:27 -0600 Received: from michael by wibble with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16MuFo-0001ma-00; Sun, 06 Jan 2002 01:05:08 +0800 From: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libctk3-dev appears to depend on libctk-dev X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.1421 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.1421 Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 01:05:07 +0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libctk3-dev Version: 3.0.24 Severity: important Looking at /usr/include/ctk-3/ctk.h, I see: #include #include #include (etc) The package does not provide /usr/include/ctk/, which I suspect will severely impact on the usability of ctk! I'm wondering if the correct solution is to put all of libctk-dev's symlinks into libctk3-dev, and just make libctk-dev a dummy package... Then all I'd need to do to the Makefile to get the examples to compile is add a -I flag pointing to glib.h... (And then after that work out how to quit the sample program by other than switching to another console and issuing kill commands, but that's another story) -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux wibble 2.2.19 #1 Sun Oct 7 11:28:23 WST 2001 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libctk3-dev depends on: ii libarr-dev0.1-49 A small, fast console drawing libr ii libc6-dev 2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libctk3 3.0.24 Console Tool Kit ii libglib1.2-dev1.2.10-3 Development files for GLib library --- Received: (at 127923-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 22:30:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 15:30:50 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtwBm-0006EH-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:30:50 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BtwBk-0002HR-M8; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:30:48 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libctk3-dev appears to depend on libctk-dev X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Zippy-Says: I'm having a tax-deductible experience! I need an energy crunch!! From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Aug 2004 15:30:48 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 33 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: > Package: libctk3-dev > Version: 3.0.24 > Severity: important > > Looking at /usr/include/ctk-3/ctk.h, I see: > > #include > #include > #include > (etc) > > The package does not provide /usr/include/ctk/, which I suspect will > severely impact on the usability of ctk! I'm wondering if the correct > solution is to put all of libctk-dev's symlinks into libctk3-dev, and just > make libctk-dev a dummy package... > > Then all I'd need to do to the Makefile to get the examples to compile is > add a -I flag pointing to glib.h... > > (And then after that work out how to quit the sample program by other than > switching to another console and issuing kill commands, but that's another > story) This is not actually a bug; it's just that libctk3-dev isn't the package you install. You're supposed to install libctk-dev, and then *that* depends on libctk3-dev. Admittedly, this is not obvious,
Bug#150235: marked as done (FTBFS: Build failure of libctk on i386)
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 15:43:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line accepted by maintainer already has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2002 10:18:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 17 05:18:03 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17JtaE-SC-00; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 05:18:02 -0500 Received: from atoron (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id TAA18178 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 19:17:30 +0900 X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be atoron Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 19:17:40 +0900 From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: submit bug tracking system <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of libctk on i386 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Netfort project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libctk Version: 3.0.24 libctk fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build. I am just filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your package from source. This is actually a serious bug, it will be upgraded to "serious" severity after woody is released This build was done using pbuilder package. It depends on automake/autoconf/libtool, and it is most likely that the auto-generation has done some tricks on it. This package hasn't been updated for a year, and smells like so. Build log follows: === ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found ./libtool: -e: command not found : compile: cannot determine name of library object from `' make[1]: *** [ctkbin.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libctk-3.0.24/ctk' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package === regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer --- Received: (at 150235-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 22:43:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 15:43:47 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtwOJ-0006zW-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:43:47 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BtwOH-0002IX-0F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:43:45 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: accepted by maintainer already X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: You'll envy the dead. From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Aug 2004 15:43:44 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This NMU was accepted by the maintainer when the first QA upload was done in version 3.0.24.2; the bug should be closed. Thomas
Bug#264459: bblaunch segfaults under Fedora Core 2 (patch)
Package: bblaunch
Version: 0.0.3-5
Any attempt to run bblaunch on Fedora Core 2 under Fluxbox results in
"Segmentation fault" with no
core file. This behavior is consistent regardless of arguments used.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .backups]# uname -a
Linux tomis 2.6.5-1.358.8kstacks #1 Sat May 22 21:46:42 EDT 2004 i686 athlon
i386 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .backups]# ls -l /lib/libc.so.6
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Jun 12 23:16 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.3.so
It appears that this package is no longer maintained:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bblaunch.html
I tracked down the problem to a bad cast and, as it turns out, the variable in
question wasn't
even being used. I deleted the line and everything works just fine. Patch is
below my signoff.
Please note that I cannot guarantee that this will fix anything in bblaunch
other than allowing it
to run with the "-d 0" option, which I use to create a borderless aterm under
fluxbox.
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Only in bblaunch-0.0.3: bblaunch
diff -u bblaunch-0.0.3.orig/bblaunch.c bblaunch-0.0.3/bblaunch.c
--- bblaunch-0.0.3.orig/bblaunch.c 2004-08-08 10:14:14.560014872 -0700
+++ bblaunch-0.0.3/bblaunch.c 2004-08-08 10:15:09.425674024 -0700
@@ -170,8 +170,6 @@
launchargs.iconic = False;
launchargs.pause = 1000;
- sprintf(launchargs.call, "%s", (char *)atoi(argv[0]));
-
i = 1;
valargs = 1;
while ((i < argc) && valargs) {
diff -u bblaunch-0.0.3.orig/bblaunch.h bblaunch-0.0.3/bblaunch.h
--- bblaunch-0.0.3.orig/bblaunch.h 2004-08-08 10:14:14.560014872 -0700
+++ bblaunch-0.0.3/bblaunch.h 2004-08-08 10:15:16.908536456 -0700
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
typedef struct LArgs
{
-char call[1024];
char command[1024];
unsigned long flags, attrib, workspace, stack, decoration;
unsigned long pause;
=
Silence is Evil
http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/philosophy/indexdecency.htm
Ovid http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=17000
Web Programming with Perl http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Bug#128058: guppi-gnumeric crashes
> Package: libguppi15 > Version: 0.40.2-7 > Severity: important > > On debian ppc sid, I find that guppi-gnumeric crashes when > I try to do the following. > > 1) run gnumeric > 2) enter two columns of three rows of numbers (1,2,3 and 2,4,6) > 3) select these six cells > 4) click on the graph icon in the gnumeric toolbar > > On my machine I get an alert that guppi-gnumeric has suffered a > segment fault. Has guppi ever actually worked within gnumeric > in recent history in sid? I am unable to reproduce this problem in the latest gnumeric (1.2.13) using libguppi16. Does the bug still happen for you? If not, please let me know and I can close the bug report. Thomas (for the Debian QA team)
Processing of libarr_0.1-52_powerpc.changes
libarr_0.1-52_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libarr_0.1-52.dsc libarr_0.1-52.tar.gz libarr-dev_0.1-52_powerpc.deb libarr0_0.1-52_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Bug#136506: marked as done (Plugins missing.)
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:21:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line already fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2002 21:40:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 02 15:40:37 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from blood.cs.unm.edu [64.106.43.210] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16hHF7-00034Z-00; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 15:40:37 -0600 Received: from viral by blood.cs.unm.edu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16hHF6-0007j3-00; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 14:40:36 -0700 From: Viral Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Plugins missing. X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54.1 X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54.1 Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 14:40:36 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: "Viral B. Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xmms-singit Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-02 Severity: important The package doesn't contain the Visualisation plugins making it mostly useless as of now. Am working to fix it soon. viral -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux blood 2.4.13 #1 Tue Nov 27 16:57:14 MST 2001 i686 --- Received: (at 136506-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 23:21:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 16:21:08 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtwyS-0002Y2-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:21:08 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BtwyS-0002NS-B8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:21:08 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: already fixed X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Zippy-Says: I'm RELIGIOUS!! I love a man with a HAIRPIECE!! Equip me with MISSILES!! From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Aug 2004 16:21:08 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This bug was fixed by NMU a while back, and accepted by the maintainer once the package's maintainer was set to the QA group, and can therefore now be closed. Thomas
Bug#148684: marked as done (xmms-singit: xmms startup failed with xmms-singit-0.1.18)
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:23:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed long ago has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2002 20:59:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 31 15:59:27 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mt.mk.cvut.cz [147.32.97.80] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17DtUc-0004eU-00; Fri, 31 May 2002 15:59:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 27997 invoked by uid 1000); 31 May 2002 20:59:29 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xmms-singit: xmms startup failed with xmms-singit-0.1.18 From: "Martin Tomasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.30 Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 22:59:29 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xmms-singit Version: 0.1.18-1 Severity: important when singit is enabled over xmms restart, xmms will not start. please update to 0.1.21, it works for me. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mt.mk.cvut.cz 2.4.18rsbac-1.2.0 #1 Tue May 28 22:11:05 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ Versions of packages xmms-singit depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.21.2.10-5 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-12 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libid3-3.7-13 3.7.13-4.1 Library for manipulating ID3v1 and ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.21:2.95.4-9 The GNU stdc++ library ii xlibs 4.1.0-17 X Window System client libraries ii xmms 1.2.7-1Versatile X audio player that look ii zlib1g1:1.1.4-1 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 148684-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 23:23:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 16:23:55 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Btx19-0002gg-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:23:55 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Btx18-0002Nv-PM for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:23:54 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed long ago X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Tom-Swiftie: "I've just been drafted," Tom said impressively From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Aug 2004 16:23:54 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 6 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Bug was fixed by NMU 0.1.27-0.1; accepted by maintainer when the QA group took over. Thomas
Bug#187990: marked as done (xmms-singit: All displayer-plugins fail to load)
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:24:53 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line long fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2003 12:53:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 07 07:53:22 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 192W7m-0003av-00; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 07:53:22 -0500 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h37CrD03017774 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:53:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA39260 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:53:08 +0200 Received: (qmail 25749 invoked by uid 0); 7 Apr 2003 12:53:07 - Received: from unknown (HELO DeepThought) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 7 Apr 2003 12:53:07 - Received: from tnt by DeepThought with local (masqmail 0.2.19) id 192W7U-4Nt-00; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:53:04 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dennis Brakhane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xmms-singit: All displayer-plugins fail to load X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:53:04 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id h37CrD03017774 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: xmms-singit Version: 0.1.18-1 Severity: important Tags: sid Hi. On my system, xmms-singit suddenly failed to work, ie it didn't display lyrics anymore. If I start xmms via console, i get something like this $ xmms /usr/lib/xmms/Visualization/xmms-singit/libdisplayer_fullscreen.so: undefined symbol: singit_karaoke_widget_set_time_indicators /usr/lib/xmms/Visualization/xmms-singit/libdisplayer_clist.so: undefined symbol: singit_tag_manager_show /usr/lib/xmms/Visualization/xmms-singit/libdisplayer_karaoke_window.so: undefined symbol: singit_tag_manager_show /usr/lib/xmms/Visualization/xmms-singit/libdisplayer_sdl.so: undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0 Hope this helps, Dennis BTW: A newer version is available -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux DeepThought 2.4.20 #2 Mon M=E4r 10 02:04:31 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE (ignored: LC_ALL set) Versions of packages xmms-singit depends on: ii libc62.3.1-16GNU C Library: Shared librar= ies an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-8The GLib library of C routin= es ii libgtk1.21.2.10-14 The GIMP Toolkit set of widg= ets fo ii libid3-3.7-133.7.13-4.1 Library for manipulating ID3= v1 and ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-17 The GNU stdc++ library ii xlibs4.2.1-6 X Window System client libra= ries ii xmms 1.2.7-3 Versatile X audio player tha= t look ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-11 compression library - runtim= e -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 187990-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 23:24:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 16:24:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Btx26-0002kk-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:24:54 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Btx25-0002O8-On for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:24:53 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: long fixed X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Tom-Swiftie: "The GNU project will probably not be Posix conformant," Tom said noncommittally From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Aug 2004 16:24:53 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL
libarr_0.1-52_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libarr-dev_0.1-52_powerpc.deb to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr-dev_0.1-52_powerpc.deb libarr0_0.1-52_powerpc.deb to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr0_0.1-52_powerpc.deb libarr_0.1-52.dsc to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr_0.1-52.dsc libarr_0.1-52.tar.gz to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr_0.1-52.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 227387 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of libctk_3.0.24.5_powerpc.changes
libctk_3.0.24.5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libctk_3.0.24.5.dsc libctk_3.0.24.5.tar.gz libctk3_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb libctk3-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb libctk-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
libctk_3.0.24.5_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libctk-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb libctk3-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk3-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb libctk3_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk3_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb libctk_3.0.24.5.dsc to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk_3.0.24.5.dsc libctk_3.0.24.5.tar.gz to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk_3.0.24.5.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#151319: marked as done (xkbd doesn't work with sawfish)
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2002 23:12:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 28 18:12:07 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from grib.customer.jump.net (firewall.linuxdevelopersgroup.com) [216.30.103.2] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17O4uN-0006tY-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:12:07 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.0.5]) by firewall.linuxdevelopersgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E59DFF3 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:12:05 -0500 (CDT) Subject: xkbd doesn't work with sawfish From: Bill Gribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 28 Jun 2002 18:12:05 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xkbd Version: 0.7.1-5 Severity: important As an ipaq user, I know that xkbd isn't really intended for normal window managers, but I actually have a real need for it on a real WM on x86 architecture so I'm reporting this as a bug. xkbd under sawfish-gnome 1.0.1.20020116-4 doesn't do a darn thing. It puts up its keyboard window but clicks on the keys don't send keypresses to the focus window. If focus is set to click-to-focus, xkbd's window actually takes focus when you click on a key. b.g. --- Received: (at 151319-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 23:35:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 16:35:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtxCP-0003tf-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BtxCP-0002Q6-LK for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Zippy-Says: If this is the DATING GAME I want to know your FAVORITE PLANET! Do I get th' MICROWAVE MOPED? From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 68 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-From-Line: MAILER-DAEMON Sun Aug 08 16:32:53 2004 Return-path: <> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:32:53 -0700 Received: from Debian-exim by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Btx9p-0002Pk-Kh for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:32:53 -0700 X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:32:53 -0700 Lines: 48 Xref: becket.becket.net incoming.generic:289882 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] all relevant MX records point to non-existent hosts -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Btx9m-0002PM-TH; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:32:50 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xkbd doesn't work with sawfish X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replie
Bug#151319: xkbd doesn't work with sawfish
> As an ipaq user, I know that xkbd isn't really intended for normal > window managers, but I actually have a real need for it on a real WM on > x86 architecture so I'm reporting this as a bug. > > xkbd under sawfish-gnome 1.0.1.20020116-4 doesn't do a darn thing. It > puts up its keyboard window but clicks on the keys don't send keypresses > to the focus window. If focus is set to click-to-focus, xkbd's window > actually takes focus when you click on a key. On current xkbd (0.8.5-2) and sawfish (1:1.3+cvs20040617-6), xkdb works fine for me. Can you see if it still fails for you, and let me know so I can either work on the bug further or close it? Many thanks. Thomas (for the Debian QA team)
Bug#259258: gnucash: Crashes on startup - guile problem
Does this problem still happen for you? I cannot reproduce it on my system, and before I try to investigate further, can you confirm that it is still a problem? > Package: gnucash > Version: 1.8.9-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi all, > > I have checked other startup problems and my error report is different > than already reported bugs. So this is my error report: Thomas
Bug#264473: filerunner: frcolor and frftp refer to missing wish8.0 binary
Package: filerunner Version: 2.5.1-14 Severity: normal I'd just re-open # 190927, which was my own bug, but you can't re-open an archived bug, apparently. Fooey on me for not paying attention when someone closed it without fixing it. Regarding the comment at the end of that bug... the alternative does not control. Neither frcolor or frftp use the alternatives system to find the wish binary... they attempt to call wish8.0 directly. Since unstable is currently at tk 8.4, that's not going to work. The fix is the same... change the two subprograms to call 'wish', rather than 'wish8.0'. Upstream missed a couple, and so did the Debian maintainer. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages filerunner depends on: ii tk8.4 8.4.6-1Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 - -- no debconf information
Фитнес шорты-миостимулятор ПОВЕР ДЖИМ
Рады предложить Вам прекрасный и беспроигрышный путь преобразить свое тело, подтянуть мыжцы бедер и ягодиц улучшить форму тела, убрать целлюлит ! Спецпредложение ! Бесплатная доставка всем! Подробности на нашем сайте: http://www.pokupki.net
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 245635 ! Bug#245635: rdiff-backup can't backup files larger than 2GB incrementally Owner recorded as Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#245635: marked as forwarded (rdiff-backup can't backup files larger than 2GB incrementally)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:39:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #245635, regarding rdiff-backup can't backup files larger than 2GB incrementally to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Received: (at 245635-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 04:39:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 21:39:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.bowdoin.edu [139.140.14.83] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bu1w9-0003Hc-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 21:39:05 -0700 Received: from splinter (rocksteady.bowdoin.edu [139.140.34.45]) by mail.bowdoin.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:39:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by splinter (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8C2769E; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:39:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:39:01 -0400 From: Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Large file (>2GB) support in librsync To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 with kernel 2.6.7-1-686 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4 X-GPG-Key: http://www.thened.net/~alec/static/alec.asc Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi librsync devs, I'm the new Debian maintainer of rdiff-backup which uses librsync1. One bug report [1] complains of rdiff-backup dying while trying to synchronize a file larger than 2GB. I've confirmed this with the latest versions of librsync1, rdiff, and rdiff-backup. While searching through the rdiff-backup-users archive, I came across this message [2] from rdiff-backup's developer indicating that this problem is one with librsync. The error message thrown (listed in the bug report) seems to back this up. =46rom what I can tell, there seems to be a lull in development; are there any plans to add support for large files in librsync? I'd submit a patch, but I'm not competent in C. Thanks for your time, Alec Berryman [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D245635 [2] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2004-06/msg= 1.html --9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBFv/lAud/2YgchcQRAicBAJ4vYy3nAdIpKSXZ3g7lmKsZwV/stACgo2rK B/yaJ/n6K8KXQsF1niwe78g= =YYOW -END PGP SIGNATURE- --9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy--
