Bug#191760: Infinite recursion on configuration

[Thomas Koenig]

Uh, the acutal problem was that wn went into an infinite recursion
on configureation, so I don't think the current bug title really
applies.

Thomas

Bug#50532: marked as done (scotty: problem with tkined)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 1999 12:06:03 +
Received: (qmail 361 invoked from network); 18 Nov 1999 12:06:02 -
Received: from office-gw.westend.com (HELO xeniac.westend.com) (212.117.64.2)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 1999 12:06:02 -
Received: by xeniac.westend.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id C33EB8C970; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 11:08:47 +0100 (CET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: scotty: problem with tkined
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 11:08:47 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: scotty
Version: 3:99-08-12-5
Severity: normal

Hello 

I like to discover a route to a network (want to have all routers and
backbones drawn on the screen). But when I enter the IP of a destination
host the stderr gives me:

nmicmpd: failed to send ICMP message
while executing
"icmp trace $ttl $todo"
(procedure "trace_route" line 12)
invoked from within
"trace_route $addrs"
(procedure "discover_traces" line 11)
invoked from within
"discover_traces"
(procedure "Discover Route" line 54)
invoked from within
"{Discover Route} {}"

Any idea ?

bye,
 
 -christian-

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux xeniac 2.2.12 #1 Thu Oct 14 09:29:24 EST 1999 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages scotty depends on:
ii  libc6   2.1.2-10   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii  tcl8.2  8.2.2-1The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8.2 - Run-T
ii  tk8.2   8.2.2-1The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.2 - Run-Ti
ii  xlib6g  3.3.5-2shared libraries required by X clients
---
Received: (at 50532-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:52:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:52:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM9P-000270-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:51:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 77F8E26B9A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C7A2FFEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has not
been maintained in Debian (orphaned for over 130 days) and is also no
longer being developed upstream.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#223202: marked as done (request-tracker: FTBFS: Cannot find any files to chmod (missing Build-Depends?))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:19:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2003 07:57:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 07 01:57:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AStN6-0006Be-00; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:30:28 -0600
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 1AStN6-0002uT-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 02:30:28 -0500
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1AStMn-0006X1-Pq
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 23:30:09 -0800
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: request-tracker: FTBFS: Cannot find any files to chmod (missing
 Build-Depends?)
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 23:29:59 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_90,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: request-tracker
Severity: serious
Version: 2.0.14-2

>From my build log:

...
make[2]: Entering directory 
`/tmp/buildd/request-tracker-2.0.14/build-tree/rt-2-0-14/lib'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl
1..1
Can't locate DBIx/SearchBuilder/Record/Cachable.pm in @INC (@INC contains: 
blib/lib blib/arch /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.2 
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.2 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2 
/usr/share/perl/5.8.2 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at blib/lib/RT/Record.pm line 
25.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at blib/lib/RT/Record.pm line 25.
Compilation failed in require at blib/lib/RT/CurrentUser.pm line 31.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at blib/lib/RT/CurrentUser.pm line 31.
Compilation failed in require at blib/lib/RT.pm line 3.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at blib/lib/RT.pm line 3.
Compilation failed in require at test.pl line 11.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at test.pl line 11.
not ok 1
make[2]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/tmp/buildd/request-tracker-2.0.14/build-tree/rt-2-0-14/lib'
...
find 
/tmp/buildd/request-tracker-2.0.14/debian/request-tracker//usr/share/request-tracker/WebRT/html
 -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 644 -- 
find 
/tmp/buildd/request-tracker-2.0.14/debian/request-tracker//usr/share/request-tracker/lib
 -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 644 -- 
chmod: too few arguments
Try `chmod --help' for more information.
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 123

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.6.0-test11 #1 Wed Dec 3 21:42:26 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)


-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 223202-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:50:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:50:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMaK-0008V0-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:19:49 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 851CC26B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:19:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D3DC6FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:19:23 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:19:23 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_2

Bug#14186: marked as done (scotty: tkined: Problems with SNMP-Host)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 1997 19:30:47 +
Received: (qmail 16436 invoked from network); 27 Oct 1997 19:30:45 -
Received: from gesundheit.cs.twsu.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@156.26.10.195)
  by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 27 Oct 1997 19:30:45 -
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by gesundheit.cs.twsu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA16353;
Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:32:57 -0600
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:32:57 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: scotty: tkined: Problems with SNMP-Host
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 2.95

Package: scotty
Version: 2.0.2-4

I have the stuck CMU snmpd installed here.

When I go to SNMP-Host, the System Information works fine.  However, if I
select Storage Information, nothing apepars.  Furthermore, after selecting
Storage Information, I cannot get System Information again without deleting
and restarting SNMP-Host.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 1.3
Kernel Version: Linux gesundheit 2.0.30 #2 Thu Oct 9 14:06:59 CDT 1997 i586 
unknown

Versions of the packages scotty depends on:
tk40Version: 4.0p3-5
netstd  Version: 2.13-1
---
Received: (at 14186-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:52:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:52:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM9P-000270-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:51:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 77F8E26B9A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C7A2FFEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has not
been maintained in Debian (orphaned for over 130 days) and is also no
longer being developed upstream.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#166057: marked as done (scotty: please add --enable-multicast to ./configure)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2002 15:38:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 23 10:38:30 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 246.chipworks.com (genki.hungrycats.org) [209.217.112.246] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 184NaX-0006Uc-00; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:38:29 -0500
Received: from zblaxell by genki.hungrycats.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
id 184Na0-0002tO-00; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:37:56 -0400
From: Zygo Blaxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: scotty: please add --enable-multicast to ./configure
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:37:55 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: scotty
Version: 4:00-02-21-2
Severity: normal

Please add --enable-multicast to ./configure when building scotty (and
especially the Tnm::udp package).  AFAIK multicast has been a standard
feature of Linux kernels for a few years now.  ;-)

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux genki 2.4.18-zb-586-smp-ide #1 SMP Fri Aug 30 19:00:20 EDT 2002 
i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages scotty depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  tcl8.38.3.3-7The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8
ii  tk8.3 8.3.3-8The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-17   X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g1:1.1.4-4  compression library - runtime


---
Received: (at 166057-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:52:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:52:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM9P-000270-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:51:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 77F8E26B9A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C7A2FFEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has not
been maintained in Debian (orphaned for over 130 days) and is also no
longer being developed upstream.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#28688: marked as done (scotty stores files into wrong directories)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 1998 06:47:23 +
Received: (qmail 30670 invoked from network); 29 Oct 1998 06:47:19 -
Received: from axl01it.ntc.nokia.com (131.228.118.232)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 1998 06:47:19 -
Received: from stybba.ntc.nokia.com (stybba.ntc.nokia.com [131.228.178.21]) by 
axl01it.ntc.nokia.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA24162 for <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:46:40 +0200 (EET)
Received: from pc-aspl-044 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by stybba.ntc.nokia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/Goodi) with SMTP id IAA23082
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:47:08 +0200 (EET)
From: "Juha Ylitalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: scotty stores files into wrong directories
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:45:59 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Importance: Normal

Package: scotty
Version: 2.1.10-1

If I start tkined with "tkined ~/scotty/debian.tki" and press File->Save, it
creates debian.tki to my current directory (i.e. /tmp) instead of the
original location.

My system is pretty much latest unstable.

aidoann% dpkg --list tk8.0 tcl8.0
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersionDescription
+++-===-==-=
===
ii  tk8.0   8.0.3-2The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.0 -
Run-Ti
ii  tcl8.0  8.0.3-3The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8.0 -
Run-T
aidoann% uname -a
Linux aidoann 2.0.35 #1 Thu Sep 17 10:57:29 EEST 1998 i586 unknown
aidoann%

--
Juha Ylitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valimo 9/3B20http://wwwinhel.ntc.nokia.com/~jylitalo 
+358 9 511 68044 http://www.iki.fi/~jylitalo 

---
Received: (at 28688-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:52:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:52:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM9P-000270-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:51:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 77F8E26B9A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C7A2FFEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has not
been maintained in Debian (orphaned for over 130 days) and is also no
longer being developed upstream.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#191760: Infinite recursion on configuration

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:23:37PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Uh, the acutal problem was that wn went into an infinite recursion
> on configureation, so I don't think the current bug title really
> applies.

No, from the information in the bug report I read that you just forgot
to do type "save" and then "exit". "std" and "old" are not intended to
exit, so it isn't a bug. This isn't intuitive or so, but it is the
intended behaviour. Sorry for not commenting when I retitled the bug.

Note that wn is currently not maintained, I just looked through the bug
reports of orphaned packages. When I look at the other bug reports
it seems that it needs badly a new maintainer or should be removed...

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#118472: acknowledged by developer (Bug#118472: fixed in gnome-sudo 0.3-1.1)

[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-09 10:03]:
> >  - Patch to fix gnome dialog (Closes: #118472)
> 
>  Well, to be honest the manual page should also be changed -- the patch
> that you have added to the bugreport only has it for the dialog. Haven't
> taken a look at the .diff.gz yet, if you have only changed the dialog
> message please consider doing it in the manpage too, as long as you
> still have the source lying around anyway  ;)

I have just checked and the manpage is correct, it does mention sudo. I do 
remember reading your statement in the bug report and checking the manpage. 
Maybe you were making the fact based on an older version?

My only change to the manpage has been:

diff -Nru gnome-sudo-0.3/src/gnome-sudo.8 gnome-sudo-0.3.new/src/gnome-sudo.8
--- gnome-sudo-0.3/src/gnome-sudo.8 2001-11-01 18:59:11.0 +0100
+++ gnome-sudo-0.3.new/src/gnome-sudo.8 2004-01-03 23:29:28.0 +0100
@@ -67,6 +67,10 @@
 .PP
 .Vb 1
 \& % gnome-sudo -- gnome-opkg --pkgdbdir=/var/db/opkg
+.SH BUGS
+.B gnome-sudo
+is currently not able to retrieve information from sudo as to if the
+command executed succeded or not.
 .SH FILES
 .I /etc/sudoers
 .SH SEE ALSO
And the manpage says

"gnome-sudo \- GUI frontend to
.BR sudo(8)
(...)"

>  I don't reopen the bug yet for I am not sure if you have fixed that
> part, too.
> 

It was already fixed (at least since 0.3)

Javi


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#227513: dict-de-en: Should depend on dict-server instead of dictd

[Martin Geisler]

Package: dict-de-en
Severity: wishlist

The package should depend on the virtual package dict-server instead
of imposing a hard depencency on dictd.  This will allow people to
install the package with serpento as their dict-server instead of
forcing them to use dictd.

(This information applies to the dict-freedict-*-* packages too,
although they only suggest dictd.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gimpster 2.6.0 #1 Thu Jan 8 22:06:43 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK

Bug#50743: marked as done (mib search path flexibility)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 1999 17:47:21 +
Received: (qmail 1931 invoked from network); 20 Nov 1999 17:47:21 -
Received: from betrayer.simons-rock.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Nov 1999 17:47:21 -
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by betrayer.simons-rock.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id LAA02880;
Sat, 20 Nov 1999 11:47:20 -0500
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 11:47:20 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mib search path flexibility
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.43

Package: scotty
Version: 3:99-08-12-5
Severity: wishlist

"Only the Tnm mibs and site directories used to search for MIBs.
It would be nice if an environment variable could be used to augment
the list."

:)

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux betrayer 2.2.12 #4 Fri Oct 15 15:50:59 EDT 1999 i686

Versions of packages scotty depends on:
ii  libc6 2.1.2-10   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  tcl8.28.2.2-1The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8
ii  tk8.2 8.2.2-1The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.
ii  xlib6g3.3.5-2shared libraries required by X cli
---
Received: (at 50743-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:52:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:52:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM9P-000270-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:51:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 77F8E26B9A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C7A2FFEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has not
been maintained in Debian (orphaned for over 130 days) and is also no
longer being developed upstream.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#210360: marked as done (php4-ming not installable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2003 00:21:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 10 19:21:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mnm.uib.es [130.206.76.41] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19xFDf-0006aP-00; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:21:55 -0500
Received: from gallir by mnm.uib.es with local (Exim 4.20)
id 19xFDd-0002R1-PR; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 02:21:53 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ricardo Galli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: php4-ming not installable
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.27
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 02:21:53 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: php4-ming
Version: 0.2a.cvs20020110-1
Severity: normal

It has a dependency to a package not existing in official Debian:
zendapi-20020429

It doesn't exist even in unstable.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mnm 2.4.21 #1 Fri Jun 13 17:44:35 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages php4-ming depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.2-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libming   0.2a.cvs20020110-1 Library to generate SWF (Flash) Fi
ii  php4 [zendapi-2001090 4:4.1.2-6  A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 210360-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 18:51:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 12:51:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM7m-0001Hn-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:50:18 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C96CD26B9B; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D8E5FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  The reasons are:
orphaned, dead upstream, grave bugs, unused.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package suggestion: VOCP

[-]

its about 1 megabyte and looks amazing for
debian...its open source..

http://www.vocpsystem.com

"Much more than an answering machine, VOCP transforms
your computer into a full-featured call answering and
voice messaging system. With the VOCP System, you can
create an unlimited number of voicemail, pager and
command shell boxes which callers will navigate using
their touch tone telephone. You can send and receive
faxes, listen to your email using text-to-speech,
filter and redirect calls based on caller ID
information, run programs through the telephone and
more."

keep up the good work..

jagginess


__ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

Bug#226241: marked as done (libming-dev: mingpp.h can't be compiled)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2004 12:05:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 05 06:05:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nan-smtp-19.noos.net (smtp.noos.fr) [212.198.2.119] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AdTHr-0004Mi-00; Mon, 05 Jan 2004 05:52:48 -0600
Received: (qmail 27403 invoked by uid 0); 5 Jan 2004 11:52:46 -
Received: from unknown (HELO nathalie.gouarec.com) ([81.65.65.115])
  (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
  by 212.198.2.119 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 5 Jan 2004 11:52:46 -
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:52:03 +0100
From: ben- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libming-dev: mingpp.h can't be compiled
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_3 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_3
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libming-dev
Version: 0.2a.cvs20030716-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable

g++ finds an error in mingpp.h:

/usr/include/mingpp.h: In member function `void=20
   SWFMovie::setSoundStream(SWFSound*)':
/usr/include/mingpp.h:297: error: cannot convert `SWFSound_s*' to `
   SWFSoundStream_s*' for argument `2' to `void=20
   SWFMovie_setSoundStream(SWFMovie_s*, SWFSoundStream_s*)'


I don't need sound in my generated SWF files, but this modification=20
helps g++ to compile mingpp.h:

>>>=
>>
@@ -293,8 +293,8 @@
   void setBackground(int r, int g, int b)
 { SWFMovie_setBackground(this->movie, r, g, b); }
=20
-  void setSoundStream(SWFSound *sound)
-{ SWFMovie_setSoundStream(this->movie, sound->sound); }
+  void setSoundStream(SWFSoundStream *sound)
+{ SWFMovie_setSoundStream(this->movie, *sound); }
=20
   SWFDisplayItem *add(SWFBlock *character)
 { return new SWFDisplayItem(SWFMovie_add(this->movie,
character->getBlock())); }
>>>=
>>


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nathalie 2.6.0-test5 #1 Fri Sep 19 11:16:11 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3Dfr_FR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=3Dfr_FR.ISO-8859-1

Versions of packages libming-dev depends on:
ii  libming   0.2a.cvs20030716-2 Library to generate SWF (Flash)
Fi

-- no debconf information


--=20
M=E9rouze Beno=EEt / ben-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" Essayer de faire marche arri=E8re ne fait pas remonter le temps ... "

---
Received: (at 226241-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 18:50:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 12:50:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM7m-0001Hn-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:50:18 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C96CD26B9B; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D8E5FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has bee

Bug#215228: marked as done (php4-ming and php4 3.3.3-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2003 10:57:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 11 05:57:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A8HQv-00026x-00; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 05:57:14 -0500
Received: from [192.168.61.101] (aweb-dev.actionweb.fr [82.67.159.142])
by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E724451C23; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:57:12 +0200 (CEST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:47:23 +0200
Subject: php4-ming and php4 3.3.3-1
From: Stephane Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bug Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: php4-ming
Version: 0.2a.cvs20020110-1
Severity: important

Package not sync with PHP4 3.3.3-1. Can't install lastest PHP4 if php4-ming
is installed.

Cheers,

Stef...


Versions of packages php4-ming depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.2-2  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libming  0.2a.cvs20020110-1 Library to generate SWF (Flash) Fi
ii  php4 [zendapi-2001090 4:4.1.2-6  A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip


...
.  Linux - Debian - php4 - JAVA/Tomcat - MySQL - Infogerance  .
. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.actionweb.fr/ .
.  Tel: (0)141 906 100-Fax: (0)141 906 101.
...


---
Received: (at 210360-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 18:51:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 12:51:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM7m-0001Hn-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:50:18 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C96CD26B9B; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D8E5FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  The reasons are:
orphaned, dead upstream, grave bugs, unused.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#13226: marked as done (scotty: ALT-W results in a Tcl error message ...)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 1997 23:38:10 +
Received: (qmail 14100 invoked from network); 20 Sep 1997 23:38:08 -
Received: from server.et-inf.fho-emden.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 20 Sep 1997 23:38:08 -
Received: from zaphod.pi.fho-emden.de (ppp018asc.fho-emden.de [193.174.117.18]) 
by server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA18937 for <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 01:30:46 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by zaphod.pi.fho-emden.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA00857;
Sun, 21 Sep 1997 01:37:47 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 01:37:45 +0200
From: Peter Tobias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: scotty: ALT-W results in a Tcl error message ...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84

Package: scotty
Version: 2.1.7-1


If you select the "SNMP - Trouble" Tool, create a report window (for
example by using the item "system information" in the "SNMP - Trouble"
Tool) and close this by using the ALT-W keys a Tcl error message will
appear on the screen:


 Error in Tcl Script:
Error: bad window path name ".tkined0.log17"


Stack Trace:
bad window path name ".tkined0.log17"
while executing
"winfo class $w"
(procedure "tkTraverseToMenu" line 6)
invoked from within
"tkTraverseToMenu .tkined0.log17 w"
(command bound to event)


It works fine using the "close" menu item of the pulldown menu of
the window.


Thanks,

Peter

-- 
Peter Tobias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP ID EFAA400D, fingerprint = 06 89 EB 2E 01 7C B4 02  04 62 89 6C 2F DD F1 3C 
---
Received: (at 13226-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:52:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:52:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM9P-000270-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:51:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 77F8E26B9A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C7A2FFEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has not
been maintained in Debian (orphaned for over 130 days) and is also no
longer being developed upstream.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#67469: marked as done (discover network doesn't work any more)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2000 19:57:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 19 14:57:32 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pacific.usatoday.com (mail9.usatoday.com) [167.8.29.64] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13EzyF-0004ZK-00; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:57:31 -0500
Received: (qmail 23316 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Jul 2000 19:50:21 -
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 15:50:21 -0400
From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: discover network doesn't work any more
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: scotty
Version: 4:00-02-21-1

using tkined1.5.0, ip discover, discover ip network, for
the locally connected ethernet segment, the report displays:

202 nodes found on network 10.8.27 in 20 seconds.

the command window where I invoked tkined displays:

nmicmpd: failed to send ICMP message
while executing
"icmp trace $ttl $todo"
(procedure "trace_route" line 12)
invoked from within
"trace_route $addrs"
(procedure "discover_traces" line 19)
invoked from within
"discover_traces"
(procedure "Discover IP Network" line 47)
invoked from within
"{Discover IP Network} {}"

and none of the discovered hosts show up.

-- 
Raul

---
Received: (at 67469-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:52:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:52:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM9P-000270-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:51:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 77F8E26B9A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C7A2FFEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has not
been maintained in Debian (orphaned for over 130 days) and is also no
longer being developed upstream.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#87800: marked as done (gate uses obsolete functions)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2001 02:47:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 26 20:47:51 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from x8b4e531b.dhcp.okstate.edu (dvdeug) [:::139.78.83.27] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14XaB4-0005QG-00; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:47:51 -0600
Received: from dvdeug by dvdeug with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14Xa9k-0002JR-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:46:28 -0600
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:46:28 -0600
From: David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gate uses obsolete functions
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
Sender: David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libgtkada1-dev
Version: 1.2.10-6
Severity: minor

If you construct a notebook via glade, gate will produce code
that uses Set_Tab, which has a comment on it in the spec saying
"This function is now obsolete, please do not use it." (It's
fairly annoying if you try to edit the resulting code and need
figure out what everything does.)

-- 
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and 
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg

---
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:44:40 2004
Received: (at 87800-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:44:41 +
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
"orphaned 500 days, broken deps, superseded by libgtkada2."  If your
bug still applies in libgtkada2, please let me know.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#226536: marked as done (libming: implicitly declared function returns a pointer that is used)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2004 07:31:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 07 01:31:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from caballero.debian.org [212.240.194.174] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ae808-0005Zc-00; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:21:12 -0600
Received: from buildd by caballero.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ae807-0002Bh-00; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 07:21:11 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libming: implicitly declared function returns a pointer that is used
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 07:21:11 +
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME 
autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libming
Version: 0.2a.cvs20030716-2
Severity: important

The following functions are used in your pacakge without being defined
(you probably forgot a header file) in your package, and the return
value is converted to a pointer.  This is guaranteed to be fatal on
ia64, and probably any 64-bit architecture.

Function `getButtonSound' implicitly converted to pointer at 
displaylist.c:506
Function `getButtonSound' implicitly converted to pointer at 
displaylist.c:506
Function `getButtonSound' implicitly converted to pointer at 
displaylist.c:506

If appropriate, please upgrade this bug to serious.

thanks,
lamont

---
Received: (at 226536-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 18:50:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 12:50:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgM7m-0001Hn-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:50:18 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C96CD26B9B; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D8E5FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:53 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  The reasons are:
orphaned, dead upstream, grave bugs, unused.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#7111: marked as done (tkined omnibus)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:51:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 1997 18:56:17 +
Received: (qmail 10763 invoked from network); 4 Feb 1997 18:56:16 -
Received: from rdm.legislate.com (HELO test.legislate.com) (198.80.98.13)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 1997 18:56:06 -
Received: (qmail 2018 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Feb 1997 19:51:23 -
Date: 4 Feb 1997 19:51:23 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tkined omnibus

Package: tkined
Version: 1.3.4-2

tkined is neat, but it's got lots of quirks and sometimes feels
clumsy.

What I'd like to be able to do with it is hand it a list of network
addresses, and have it go out and poll those networks and come back
with the topology of the network, with emphasis on the network
devices, and icons assigned based on some kind of signatures
(e.g. windows machines tend to only respond on port 139, snmp will
sometimes give you system information, sunrpc sometimes is useful..).
tkined is tantalizing, but has a long way to go before it can tackle
this kind of thing.

Perhaps the best option would be some kind of documented mechanism for
importing a database, with some well defined tables, and using tkined
only as presentation software.  Then, I would go in with scotty, and
maybe tools I've written myself, build up the database over a period
of days and use tkined to take snapshots of this.



(1) it will sometimes put graphics "off the page", but won't let you
scroll to see them (or even select them).  I'd prefer if the page
boundaries were advisory (something like the way an expanded group is
displayed, but maybe different line weight or color?).

(2) it misses opportunities for information.  For example, I'd like to
be able to have it automatically color nodes that have erroroneous
behavior (e.g. byte swapped ports).

(3) it occasionally spits stack traces out at me.  [I'll try to file
these as I come across them.]

(4) it sometimes creates duplicate representations for the same ip
address or network, and I don't understand why.

(5) it doesn't have a way of representing subnets smaller than class
C.  [Or, presumably, larger than class C but not class A or B -- then
again, I don't have any way of testing that out.]

(6) it doesn't have any way (other than slow manual work) of
integrating information from snmp (e.g. which ip addresses does a
cisco router use, what type of network is on each, what does arp
indicate about brand of network device, ...).  It would be nice to (a)
have a way of automatically propagating this information into
attributes, and (b) have a mechanism to automatically set icon details
based on attributes.

(7) choice icons are very limited, and no obvious way of extending
them.

(8) nested groups are kind of nice but extremely quirky.  [You can put
a group inside another group, but under some circumstances the
contents of the groups will be tossed out of the original group -- I
just had a bunch of networks tossed out of a three level deep
hierarchy I'd built to represent a router.]

(9) snmp queries against a number of systems will frequently give up
if there's a few that aren't responding in the current community.

(10) selection by address sometimes gets the wrong node (especially
with patterns).

(11) TCP Services under IP-Trouble tends to hang for a long period of
time under not-uncommon circumstances (e.g. some ports behind packet
filter).

(12) The IP-Layout parameters are overly optimistic about the minimum
number of nodes in a row (10).  Why can't I set this lower?

(13) IP-Discover's text view tells me about querying snmp agents, but
there's no apparent way of getting at these specific machines for
further interaction (see also #6, and #9).

(14) There's no way to set the default icon for IP-Discover (this is
basically an ultra simplified variant on #6).

(15) There's no display abstraction for a machine with multiple ip
addresses.  For example, if I use "groups", I wind up with a bunch of
disconnected networks.

-- 
Raul
---
Received: (at 7111-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 11:52:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 05:51:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
  

Bug#225060: marked as done (libgtkada1-dev: libgtkada1 must be recompiled with gnat 3.15p)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2003 14:50:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 25 08:50:56 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postman4.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.0.189] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AZUe1-0006yH-00; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:31:13 -0600
Received: from qittatun (pD953663A.dip.t-dialin.net [217.83.102.58])
(authenticated bits=0)
by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id 
hBPCVBYI028398;
Thu, 25 Dec 2003 13:31:11 +0100 (MET)
Received: by qittatun (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0A5F0FE987; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 13:30:58 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Sebastian D.B. Krause" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgtkada1-dev: libgtkada1 must be recompiled with gnat 3.15p
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 13:30:58 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgtkada1-dev
Version: 1.2.12-8
Severity: grave


The package libgtkada1-dev is not installable because it still depends
on gnat 3.14. It should be recompiled with gnat 3.15 or better removed
from the Debian archive because the mostly compatible libgtkada2 is now
available in Debian.

# apt-get install libgtkada1-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgtkada1-dev: Depends: libgnat-3.14p-1 (>= 3.14p-2) but it is not
installable or
   gnat (< 3.15)
E: Broken packages

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux qittatun 2.6.0-ben1 #1 Sun Dec 21 21:02:00 CET 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Received: (at 225060-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:44:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:44:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
"orphaned 500 days, broken deps, superseded by libgtkada2."  If your
bug still applies in libgtkada2, please let me know.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#141065: marked as done (libgtkada1-dev: doc-base file refers to wrong file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2002 17:01:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 03 11:01:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from agrenoble-102-1-2-72.abo.wanadoo.fr (jophur.maison.fr) 
[80.13.2.72] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16so8Z-sW-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:01:31 -0600
Received: from laurent by jophur.maison.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 16so8W-0001YQ-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:01:28 +0200
From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgtkada1-dev: doc-base file refers to wrong file
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.49
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:01:28 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libgtkada1-dev
Version: 1.2.12-7
Severity: normal


Hi,

here is another doc-base error. /usr/share/doc-base/libgtkada_rm
refers to:

Index: /usr/share/doc/libgtkada1-dev/gtkada_rm/gtkada_rm.html
Files: /usr/share/doc/libgtkada1-dev/gtkada_rm/gtkada_rm.html

but this file does not exist.  It should be:

Index: /usr/share/doc/libgtkada1-dev/gtkada_rm/gtkada_rm_toc.html
Files: /usr/share/doc/libgtkada1-dev/gtkada_rm/gtkada_rm*.html

There is a similar problem for:

Files: /usr/share/doc/libgtkada1-dev/gtkada_rm/gtkada_rm.txt
Files: /usr/share/doc/libgtkada1-dev/gtkada_rm/gtkada_rm.ps

(missing .gz extension)


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jophur 2.4.18-k7 #2 Wed Mar 20 20:28:54 EST 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages libgtkada1-dev depends on:
ii  gnat  3.14p-3The GNU Ada 95 compiler
ii  gnat [libgnat-3.14p-1]3.14p-3The GNU Ada 95 compiler
ii  libc6 2.2.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libc6-dev 2.2.5-4GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-dev 0.16.0-1   The GdkPixBuf library - developmen
ii  libglade0 1:0.17-2.2 Library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglade0-dev [libglade-dev]  1:0.17-2.2 Development files for libglade.
ii  libglib1.21.2.10-4   The GLib library of C routines
pn  libgnat-3.14p-1 (>= 3.14p-2) Not found.
ii  libgnome-dev  1.4.1.4-3  The Gnome libraries -- development
ii  libgtk1.2 1.2.10-10  The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libgtk1.2-dev 1.2.10-10  Development files for the GIMP Too
ii  libgtkada11.2.12-7   Ada binding for the GTK library
ii  libgtkada1-glade  1.2.12-7   Ada binding for Glade generated ap
ii  libgtkada1-gnome  1.2.12-7   Ada binding for the Gnome Library
ii  libpopt-dev   1.6.2-7lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  rcs   5.7-13 The GNU Revision Control System
ii  xlibmesa-dev [libgl-dev]  4.1.0-14   XFree86 version of Mesa 3D graphic
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-14   X Window System client libraries


---
Received: (at 141065-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:45:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:45:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13

Bug#145761: marked as done (libgtkada1-dev: gate produces exception)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2002 06:43:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 04 01:43:14 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au [203.12.237.97] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 173tGB-00068J-00; Sat, 04 May 2002 01:43:12 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9073F27AE7; Sat,  4 May 2002 16:43:05 +1000 (EST)
Received: from scrooge.chocbit.org.au (scrooge.apana.org.au [203.12.237.100])
by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4FC2D27AE1; Sat,  4 May 2002 16:43:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by scrooge.chocbit.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5F71AC69F; Sat,  4 May 2002 16:43:08 +1000 (EST)
Received: by scrooge.chocbit.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id B49F8AE29; Sat,  4 May 2002 16:43:03 +1000 (EST)
From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgtkada1-dev: gate produces exception
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 16:43:03 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020316
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020316
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libgtkada1-dev
Version: 1.2.12-7
Severity: important

Very simple project, contains gnome application window and nothing else.

[530] [scrooge:bam] ~/Projects/project2 >gate project2.glade
Generating Ada files...
Couldn't generate Ada code. Exiting.

[532] [scrooge:bam] ~/Projects/project2 >sh -x gate project2.glade
[..]
+ /usr/lib/gtkada/gate-in.exe /home/bam/Projects/project2/project2.glade
+ '[' 2 '!=' 0 ']'
+ echo 'Couldn'\''t generate Ada code. Exiting.'
Couldn't generate Ada code. Exiting.
+ exit 1

[532] [scrooge:bam] ~/Projects/project2 >/usr/lib/gtkada/gate-in.exe
/home/bam/Projects/project2/project2.glade
with Gtk; use Gtk;
with Gtk.Main;
with Gtk.Widget; use Gtk.Widget;
with App1_Pkg; use App1_Pkg;

procedure Project2 is
begin
   Gtk.Main.Set_Locale;
   Gtk.Main.Init;
   Gtk_New (App1);
   Show_All (App1);
   Gtk.Main.Main;
end Project2;
Exception = CONSTRAINT_ERROR
GATE: Internal error. Please send a bug report with the XML
file /home/bam/Projects/project2/project2.glade and the
GtkAda version to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux scrooge 2.4.18 #1 Wed Apr 3 13:18:14 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages libgtkada1-dev depends on:
ii  gnat  3.14p-3The GNU Ada 95 compiler
ii  gnat [libgnat-3.14p-1]3.14p-3The GNU Ada 95 compiler
ii  libc6 2.2.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libc6-dev 2.2.5-4GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-dev 0.16.0-1   The GdkPixBuf library - developmen
ii  libglade0 1:0.17-2.2 Library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglade0-dev [libglade-dev]  1:0.17-2.2 Development files for libglade.
ii  libglib1.21.2.10-4   The GLib library of C routines
pn  libgnat-3.14p-1 (>= 3.14p-2) Not found.
ii  libgnome-dev  1.4.1.4-3  The Gnome libraries -- development
ii  libgtk1.2 1.2.10-10  The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libgtk1.2-dev 1.2.10-10  Development files for the GIMP Too
ii  libgtkada11.2.12-7   Ada binding for the GTK library
ii  libgtkada1-glade  1.2.12-7   Ada binding for Glade generated ap
ii  libgtkada1-gnome  1.2.12-7   Ada binding for the Gnome Library
ii  libpopt-dev   1.6.2-7lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  rcs   5.7-13 The GNU Revision Control System
ii  xlibmesa-dev [libgl-dev]  4.1.0-16   XFree86 version of Mesa 3D graphic
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-16   X Window System client libraries


---
Received: (at 145761-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:45:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:45:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.3

Bug#209713: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 20:38:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 15:38:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wovG-0006a0-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:17:11 -0500
Received: (qmail 6254 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:17:10 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:17:09 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libgtkada1-gl
Version: 1.2.12-7
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3

Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:

 The description should be written so that it gives the system
 administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
 package.

Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').

If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.

If this package is being generated from a single source package and 
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars. 

This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.

Regards

Javier Fernandez-Sanguino

PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html


---
Received: (at 209713-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:44:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:44:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
"orphaned 500 days, broken deps, superseded by libgtkada2."  If your
bug still applies in libgtkada2, please let me know.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#209793: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:13:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 16:13:48 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wovI-0006aB-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:17:12 -0500
Received: (qmail 6282 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:17:11 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:17:11 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libgtkada1-gnome
Version: 1.2.12-7
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3

Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:

 The description should be written so that it gives the system
 administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
 package.

Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').

If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.

If this package is being generated from a single source package and 
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars. 

This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.

Regards

Javier Fernandez-Sanguino

PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html


---
Received: (at 209793-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:44:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:44:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
"orphaned 500 days, broken deps, superseded by libgtkada2."  If your
bug still applies in libgtkada2, please let me know.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#150618: marked as done (libgtkada1-dev: compilation with gnat-3.1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2002 11:34:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 21 06:34:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from meije.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr [193.55.51.34] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17LMgR-0008DD-00; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 06:34:31 -0500
Received: from tux.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr ([193.55.51.130] ident=mail)
by meije.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 17LMfq-0003oo-00; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:33:54 +0200
Received: from bonnaud by tux.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
id 17LMfq-5W-00; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:33:54 +0200
From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgtkada1-dev: compilation with gnat-3.1
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:33:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libgtkada1-dev
Version: 1.2.12-7
Severity: wishlist


Hi,

would it be possible to recompile a libgtkada-dev version for use with 
gnat-3.1 ?


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tux 2.4.18-686-smp #1 SMP Sun Apr 14 12:07:19 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR

Versions of packages libgtkada1-dev depends on:
ii  gnat3.14p-3  The GNU Ada 95 compiler
ii  gnat [libgnat-3.14p-1]  3.14p-3  The GNU Ada 95 compiler
ii  libc6   2.2.5-6  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libc6-dev   2.2.5-6  GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-dev   0.17.0-2 The GdkPixBuf library - developmen
ii  libglade0   1:0.17-2.2   Library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglade0-dev [libglade 1:0.17-2.2   Development files for libglade.
ii  libglib1.2  1.2.10-ximian.2  The GLib library of C routines
pn  libgnat-3.14p-1 (>= 3.1  Not found.
ii  libgnome-dev1.4.1.4-3The Gnome libraries -- development
ii  libgtk1.2   1.2.10-ximian.21 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libgtk1.2-dev   1.2.10-ximian.21 Development files for the GIMP Too
ii  libgtkada1  1.2.12-7 Ada binding for the GTK library
ii  libgtkada1-glade1.2.12-7 Ada binding for Glade generated ap
ii  libgtkada1-gnome1.2.12-7 Ada binding for the Gnome Library
ii  libpopt-dev 1.6.2-7  lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  mesag-dev [libgl-dev]   3.4.2.1-4Development library for Mesa [libc
ii  rcs 5.7-13   The GNU Revision Control System
ii  xlibs   4.1.0-16 X Window System client libraries


---
Received: (at 150618-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:45:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:45:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
"orphaned 500 days, broken deps, superse

Bug#154481: marked as done (libgtkada1-dev: depends von libgnome)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2002 11:44:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 27 06:44:19 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from annwfn.erfurt.thur.de [194.122.210.1] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17YPze-0006sW-00; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 06:44:19 -0500
Received: from annwfn.erfurt.thur.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by annwfn.erfurt.thur.de (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g6RBiGuw021777
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:44:16 +0200
Received: from drcomp.UUCP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by annwfn.erfurt.thur.de (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) with bsmtp id 
g6RBiGIj021776
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:44:16 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by drcomp.erfurt.thur.de (8.10.2/8.10.2) id g6RBhDF11874
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:43:13 +0200
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:43:13 +0200
From: Adrian Knoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgtkada1-dev: depends von libgnome
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by annwfn.erfurt.thur.de id 
g6RBiGuw021777
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libgtkada1-dev
Version: 1.2.12-7
Severity: normal

GtkAda can be built with and without Gnome-Support. The dev-version
should be without, because libgtkada1-gnome exists.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sshq 2.4.18 #1 Fri Jul 5 23:51:58 CEST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC

Versions of packages libgtkada1-dev depends on:
ii  gnat  3.14p-3The GNU Ada 95 compiler
ii  gnat [libgnat-3.14p-1]3.14p-3The GNU Ada 95 compiler
ii  libc6 2.2.5-10   GNU C Library: Shared librar=
ies an
ii  libc6-dev 2.2.5-10   GNU C Library: Development L=
ibrari
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-dev 0.17.0-2   The GdkPixBuf library - deve=
lopmen
ii  libglade0 1:0.17-2.2 Library to load .glade files=
 at ru
ii  libglade0-dev [libglade-dev]  1:0.17-2.2 Development files for libgla=
de.
ii  libglib1.21.2.10-4   The GLib library of C routin=
es
pn  libgnat-3.14p-1 (>=3D 3.14p-2) Not found.
ii  libgnome-dev  1.4.1.4-3  The Gnome libraries -- devel=
opment
ii  libgtk1.2 1.2.10-11  The GIMP Toolkit set of widg=
ets fo
ii  libgtk1.2-dev 1.2.10-11  Development files for the GI=
MP Too
ii  libgtkada11.2.12-7   Ada binding for the GTK libr=
ary
ii  libgtkada1-glade  1.2.12-7   Ada binding for Glade genera=
ted ap
di  libgtkada1-gnome  1.2.12-7   Ada binding for the Gnome Li=
brary
ii  libpopt-dev   1.6.2-7lib for parsing cmdline para=
meters
ii  rcs   5.7-13 The GNU Revision Control Sys=
tem
ii  xlibmesa-dev [libgl-dev]  4.1.0-16   XFree86 version of Mesa 3D g=
raphic
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-16   X Window System client libra=
ries

--=20
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://adi.thur.de  PGP: v2-key via 
keyserver

Das Fleisch war willig, doch das Gras war na=DF

---
Received: (at 154481-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:45:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:45:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Remove

Bug#209660: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 20:29:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 15:17:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wovJ-0006ah-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:17:13 -0500
Received: (qmail 6311 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:17:12 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:17:12 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libgtkada1
Version: 1.2.12-7
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3

Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:

 The description should be written so that it gives the system
 administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
 package.

Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').

If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.

If this package is being generated from a single source package and 
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars. 

This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.

Regards

Javier Fernandez-Sanguino

PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html


---
Received: (at 209660-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:45:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:44:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
"orphaned 500 days, broken deps, superseded by libgtkada2."  If your
bug still applies in libgtkada2, please let me know.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#183566: marked as done (FTBFS: Fails to build with xlibmesa-gl-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2003 20:40:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 05 14:40:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cygnus-ext.enyo.de (mail.enyo.de) [212.9.189.162] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18qfgJ-0004dV-00; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 14:40:04 -0600
Received: from [212.9.189.171] (helo=deneb.enyo.de)
by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2)
id 18qfgI-0007pS-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 21:40:02 +0100
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.34 #4)
id 18qfgI-0003JT-00; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 21:40:02 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: Fails to build with xlibmesa-gl-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 21:40:02 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgtkada1
Version: 1.2.12-7 (not installed)
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source

xlibmesa-gl-dev can be used to satisfy part of the build dependencies,
but the configure stage does not detect that GL implementation, so the
package build fails.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux deneb 2.4.20 #2 Sat Mar 1 19:48:27 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US


---
Received: (at 183566-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:45:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:45:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
"orphaned 500 days, broken deps, superseded by libgtkada2."  If your
bug still applies in libgtkada2, please let me know.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#145891: marked as done (libgtkada package misnamed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2002 13:56:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 05 08:56:12 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kfep01.dion.ne.jp [203.181.105.163] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 174MUm-0003QI-00; Sun, 05 May 2002 08:56:12 -0500
Received: from vivare ([218.222.58.159]) by kfep01.dion.ne.jp with SMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 5 May 2002 22:56:10 +0900
Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 22:49:23 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgtkada package misnamed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libgtkada1

The package should probably be called libgtkada-1.2-12


usr/lib/libgtkada-1.2.so.12 libs/libgtkada1 12
usr/lib/libgtkada_art-1.2.so.12 libs/libgtkada1-art 12
usr/lib/libgtkada_gl-1.2.so.12 libs/libgtkada1-gl 12
usr/lib/libgtkada_glade-1.2.so.12 libs/libgtkada1-glade 12

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/

---
Received: (at 145891-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:45:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:45:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMZX-0008O6-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:18:59 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C88D426B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D234FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:34 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
"orphaned 500 days, broken deps, superseded by libgtkada2."  If your
bug still applies in libgtkada2, please let me know.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#100426: STOCK MARKET ALERT: QENC 2003 Third Quarter Net Income Rose 76.8%

[Gonzalo Staton]

OTC FIRST ALERT - New Public Company of the Month

Symbol: QENC
Market: PK
Sector: Queench, Inc.


BREAKING NEWS:  Jan 8, 2004  -- Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC)is now a full-time
supplier of bottled water to the military.
JERICHO, NY - Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC) today announced that it has completed
inspection and approval of its water bottling plants by the U.S. Army
Veterinary Command (VETCOM).


BREAKING NEWS:   Nov. 13, 2003  -- Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC) 2003 Third
Quarter Net Income Rose 76.8%. The Third Quarter Net Income ending 9/30/03
increased 76.8% from the Q2, and a 987% increase year-to-year. Net income
for the 9 months ending 9/30/03 resulted in a 1274% year-to-year increase.



Jim Furey of Lehman Brothers says, "You want to own small stocks versus
large stocks when economic growth is accelerating, which is exactly the
period we're in now."

QENC is a small company perfectly poised to harness the $7.6 billion bottle
water segment with a high quality premium brand priced competitively.


The bottled water segment is the fastest growing of the beverage market.  Of
the $100 billion beverage industry, bottled water is nearly $7.6 billion
annually, and forecasted to grow over 50% over the next 5 years.


QENC has the best of both worlds, where unlike Aquafina and Dasani, QENC is
high-end natural spring water, and unlike Evian, QENC is competitively
priced.  QENC's target consumer is health and beauty conscious including Gen
Y, Gen X, and Baby Boomers who live a metropolitan lifestyle.

QENC offers two fantastic product lines: Queench Natural Spring Water and
the Queench Flavored Water Beverages, which are vitamin-enhanced and come in
five cool new flavors: Coconut, O' Ginger, Red Raspberry, Pineapple and
LeMon.


DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING

QENC bottled water is nationally distributed through SYSCO FOODS.  SYSCO
Foods is the largest food distributor operating 145 locations and has sales
and service relationships with 420,000 customers including restaurants,
healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments, and more.
This relationship provides key access to new markets with low capital
requirements.

Naomi Campbell's NC CONNECT integrated marketing agency, has signed to help
QENC reach national and global consumers by providing marketing and
advertising that will position QENC as a major lifestyle brand in the
bottled water market.

01/08/04: QENC completed inspection and approval of its plants by the US
Army Veterinary Command (VETCOM).  QENC's been supplying the military
contract in the South and Florida and the Army has been increasing orders on
a monthly basis, which will result in higher Q1 2004 revenue.

12/03/03: QENC's strategically placing new eye-catching vending machines in
locations on college campuses, retail, entertainment and sports venues and
convenience stores.  500 vending machines installed in initial rollout in
2003 with approx. 2,500 vending machines to be installed in a 3-year period.
The beverage-vending channel is typically highly profitable.


FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

12/03/03: QENC is currently shipping over 54,000 cases of bottled water
quarterly, with a year-to-date quarterly revenue growth rate of 19.7%

QENC's NET INCOME for the Q3 ending 9/30/03 increased 76.8% from the Q2, and
a 987% increase year-to-year. Net income for the 9 months ending 9/30/03
resulted in a 1274% year-to-year increase.

QENC's SALES for the Q2 of 2002 increased 77% to $848,269 year-to-year, from
$478,052, as a result of rolling out new product lines and implementing a
channel development strategy.

QENC's high quality premium water is priced very competitive, they have an
excellent distribution channel with SYSCO and strategically placed vending
machines, and a marketing campaign designed to focus on their target market.
For a young company QENC has made substantial accomplishments and is poised
to harness their segment of the $7.6 billion bottle water industry.




To Receive First Notices on Companies like this
([EMAIL PROTECTED])






The information herein is for information purposes only and should not be
construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or to sell
securities. This assembled information is based on information supplied by
the company, press releases, SEC filings, or from other sources believed to
be reliable, but no representation, expressed or implied, is made as to its
accuracy, completeness or correctness. The data contained herein is subject
to change without notice. Small-cap companies, micro-cap companies, penny
stocks and/or thinly traded securities are inherently risky and volatile;
therefore the risk of losing some or all should be calculated. Please always
do your own due diligence and consult a financial advisor. OTCFirstAlert
accepts no liability for any losses arising from an investor's reliance on
or use of this report. Affiliates of OTCFirstAlert have been hired by a
third party and are to receive eight hundred thirty three thousand three
hundred th

Bug#153793: STOCK MARKET ALERT: QENC 2003 Third Quarter Net Income Rose 76.8%

[Wanda Voss]

OTC FIRST ALERT - New Public Company of the Month

Symbol: QENC
Market: PK
Sector: Queench, Inc.


BREAKING NEWS:  Jan 8, 2004  -- Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC)is now a full-time
supplier of bottled water to the military.
JERICHO, NY - Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC) today announced that it has completed
inspection and approval of its water bottling plants by the U.S. Army
Veterinary Command (VETCOM).


BREAKING NEWS:   Nov. 13, 2003  -- Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC) 2003 Third
Quarter Net Income Rose 76.8%. The Third Quarter Net Income ending 9/30/03
increased 76.8% from the Q2, and a 987% increase year-to-year. Net income
for the 9 months ending 9/30/03 resulted in a 1274% year-to-year increase.



Jim Furey of Lehman Brothers says, "You want to own small stocks versus
large stocks when economic growth is accelerating, which is exactly the
period we're in now."

QENC is a small company perfectly poised to harness the $7.6 billion bottle
water segment with a high quality premium brand priced competitively.


The bottled water segment is the fastest growing of the beverage market.  Of
the $100 billion beverage industry, bottled water is nearly $7.6 billion
annually, and forecasted to grow over 50% over the next 5 years.


QENC has the best of both worlds, where unlike Aquafina and Dasani, QENC is
high-end natural spring water, and unlike Evian, QENC is competitively
priced.  QENC's target consumer is health and beauty conscious including Gen
Y, Gen X, and Baby Boomers who live a metropolitan lifestyle.

QENC offers two fantastic product lines: Queench Natural Spring Water and
the Queench Flavored Water Beverages, which are vitamin-enhanced and come in
five cool new flavors: Coconut, O' Ginger, Red Raspberry, Pineapple and
LeMon.


DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING

QENC bottled water is nationally distributed through SYSCO FOODS.  SYSCO
Foods is the largest food distributor operating 145 locations and has sales
and service relationships with 420,000 customers including restaurants,
healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments, and more.
This relationship provides key access to new markets with low capital
requirements.

Naomi Campbell's NC CONNECT integrated marketing agency, has signed to help
QENC reach national and global consumers by providing marketing and
advertising that will position QENC as a major lifestyle brand in the
bottled water market.

01/08/04: QENC completed inspection and approval of its plants by the US
Army Veterinary Command (VETCOM).  QENC's been supplying the military
contract in the South and Florida and the Army has been increasing orders on
a monthly basis, which will result in higher Q1 2004 revenue.

12/03/03: QENC's strategically placing new eye-catching vending machines in
locations on college campuses, retail, entertainment and sports venues and
convenience stores.  500 vending machines installed in initial rollout in
2003 with approx. 2,500 vending machines to be installed in a 3-year period.
The beverage-vending channel is typically highly profitable.


FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

12/03/03: QENC is currently shipping over 54,000 cases of bottled water
quarterly, with a year-to-date quarterly revenue growth rate of 19.7%

QENC's NET INCOME for the Q3 ending 9/30/03 increased 76.8% from the Q2, and
a 987% increase year-to-year. Net income for the 9 months ending 9/30/03
resulted in a 1274% year-to-year increase.

QENC's SALES for the Q2 of 2002 increased 77% to $848,269 year-to-year, from
$478,052, as a result of rolling out new product lines and implementing a
channel development strategy.

QENC's high quality premium water is priced very competitive, they have an
excellent distribution channel with SYSCO and strategically placed vending
machines, and a marketing campaign designed to focus on their target market.
For a young company QENC has made substantial accomplishments and is poised
to harness their segment of the $7.6 billion bottle water industry.




To Receive First Notices on Companies like this
([EMAIL PROTECTED])






The information herein is for information purposes only and should not be
construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or to sell
securities. This assembled information is based on information supplied by
the company, press releases, SEC filings, or from other sources believed to
be reliable, but no representation, expressed or implied, is made as to its
accuracy, completeness or correctness. The data contained herein is subject
to change without notice. Small-cap companies, micro-cap companies, penny
stocks and/or thinly traded securities are inherently risky and volatile;
therefore the risk of losing some or all should be calculated. Please always
do your own due diligence and consult a financial advisor. OTCFirstAlert
accepts no liability for any losses arising from an investor's reliance on
or use of this report. Affiliates of OTCFirstAlert have been hired by a
third party and are to receive eight hundred thirty three thousand three
hundred th

Bug#151913: marked as done (gutenbrowser: config options not saved :()

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2002 12:22:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 04 07:22:30 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dyn-213-36-136-71.ppp.tiscali.fr (argos.server.maison) 
[213.36.136.71] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17Q5cy-0002bV-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 07:22:29 -0500
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17Q5g8-0004NK-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:25:44 +0200
Subject: gutenbrowser: config options not saved :(
Reply-To: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Alban Browaeys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.43
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:25:44 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "Reply-To" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gutenbrowser
Version: 3:0.6.8.3-2.1
Severity: normal

Hi again

Coul i request some hints (i m no perl programmer yet :( ) on the way
the configure (options) window works and how to add an "Apply" button to
it ? 
Plus:  when i check the "Use ftp" or uncheck "Use pg index instead of
ftp library" in the main part or when changing the http server in the
htt part the changes are not saved ( i got "Please query before leaving
the library." , don t know if it s related though when i uncheck "Query
before exit" the change is saved )



-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux argos.server.maison 2.4.18 #10 SMP mar jun 18 00:00:38 CEST 2002 
i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages gutenbrowser depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.5-6   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libqt2 3:2.3.1-22Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-9The GNU stdc++ library
ii  unzip  5.50-1De-archiver for .zip files
ii  xlibs  4.2.0-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 151913-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 01:48:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 19:48:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMRQ-000779-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:37 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7643D26B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:10:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B2018FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was not
maintained, dead upstream and not usable.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#214760: marked as done (gutenbrowser: Gutenbrowser ought to be updated to work with qt3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2003 15:33:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 08 10:32:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.153] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A7GJ4-0005aG-00; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:32:55 -0500
Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-58-120-156.twcny.rr.com [24.58.120.156])
by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id 
h98FWqU8009534;
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:32:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by doctormoo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 928024438A; Wed,  8 Oct 2003 11:32:53 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gutenbrowser: Gutenbrowser ought to be updated to work with qt3
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:32:53 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: gutenbrowser
Version: 3:0.6.8.3-2.1
Severity: wishlist

Says it all.  
Gutenbrowser is in the short list of non-KDE applications depending on
qt2.  http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2003/debian-kde-200302/msg00301.html

SuSE appears to have gotten it working with qt3; see 
http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/suse/8.2/i386/suse/i586/gutenbrowser-0.6.8.3-382.i586.html

Upstream is easy to find:  http://www.llornkcor.com/software.html.
Unfortunately, upstream hasn't updated since 2001.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux doctormoo 2.4.21-ncn.3 #1 SMP Sat Aug 16 22:46:19 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages gutenbrowser depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libqt2   3:2.3.1-22  Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2   1:2.95.4-17 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  unzip5.50-3  De-archiver for .zip files
ii  xlibs4.2.1-12.1  X Window System client libraries

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 214760-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 01:48:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 19:48:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMRQ-000779-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:37 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7643D26B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:10:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B2018FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was not
maintained, dead upstream and not usable.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#121686: marked as done (fails to build from source on alpha)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2001 09:04:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 03:04:34 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 169N7S-0002WX-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 03:04:34 -0600
Received: from pool-63.50.169.199.dnvr.grid.net ([63.50.169.199] 
helo=tootie.covert.tdyc.com)
by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 169N7N-Y9-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 04:04:30 -0500
Received: by tootie.covert.tdyc.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7BD09230EB; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 02:04:28 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 02:04:28 -0700
From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fails to build from source on alpha
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gutenbrowser
Severity: serious

g++ apps need to be build with no optimization on alpha due to some problems
with the compiler.  It is best to pass

   -O0 -mieee

off to CXXFLAGS at build time for alpha builds otherwise you'll end up
with build problems like this.

Ivan

-- 

Ivan E. Moore II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD

---
Received: (at 121686-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 01:48:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 19:48:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMRQ-000779-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:37 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7643D26B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:10:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B2018FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was not
maintained, dead upstream and not usable.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#151911: marked as done (gutenbrowser: doc problem -> help browser unable to find doc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2002 12:16:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 04 07:16:41 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dyn-213-36-136-71.ppp.tiscali.fr (argos.server.maison) 
[213.36.136.71] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17Q5XN-0002Mp-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 07:16:41 -0500
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17Q5aU-0004Gw-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:19:54 +0200
Subject: gutenbrowser: doc problem -> help browser unable to find doc
Reply-To: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Alban Browaeys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.43
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:19:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "Reply-To" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gutenbrowser
Version: 3:0.6.8.3-2.1
Severity: normal

the help button (the second one after the doc can t be current thingy :)
does not open /usr/share/doc/gutenbrowser/html/index.html as supposed
but /usr/share/doc/gutenbrowser/index.html which does not exist .

Sorry not to supply a fast patch and t4all
Alban


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux argos.server.maison 2.4.18 #10 SMP mar jun 18 00:00:38 CEST 2002 
i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages gutenbrowser depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.5-6   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libqt2 3:2.3.1-22Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-9The GNU stdc++ library
ii  unzip  5.50-1De-archiver for .zip files
ii  xlibs  4.2.0-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 151911-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 01:48:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 19:48:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMRQ-000779-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:37 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7643D26B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:10:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B2018FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was not
maintained, dead upstream and not usable.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#198534: marked as done (gutenbrowser: FTBFS: Tries to use g++-3.3 with qt2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2003 20:22:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 23 15:22:18 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19UXpR-0005J0-00; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:22:18 -0500
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3])
by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 19UXpR-0002b2-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 16:22:17 -0400
Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20)
id 19UXpQ-9W-CW
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:22:16 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gutenbrowser: FTBFS: Tries to use g++-3.3 with qt2
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:22:16 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: gutenbrowser
Version: 3:0.6.8.3-2.1
Severity: serious

>From my build log:

...
g++  -o gutenbrowser CConfigFile.o CConfigGroup.o LibraryDialog.o 
LibraryDialogData.o NetworkDialog.o SearchDialog.o SearchResults.o 
bookmarksdlg.o browserDialog.o ftpsitedlg.o helpme.o http.o multiline_ex.o 
openetext.o openetextdata.o optionsDialog.o optionsDialogData.o helpwindow.o 
styles.o wood.o metal.o gutenbrowserData.o gutenbrowserdoc.o gutenbrowserview.o 
gutenbrowser.o main.o moc_LibraryDialog.o moc_NetworkDialog.o 
moc_SearchDialog.o moc_SearchResults.o moc_bookmarksdlg.o moc_helpme.o 
moc_http.o moc_multiline_ex.o moc_openetext.o moc_optionsDialog.o 
moc_helpwindow.o moc_gutenbrowserdoc.o moc_gutenbrowserview.o 
moc_gutenbrowser.o  -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lqt -lXext -lX11 -lm
CConfigFile.o(.text+0x5a): In function 
`CConfigFile::CConfigFile[not-in-charge](QString const&)':
: undefined reference to `QString::shared_null'
CConfigFile.o(.text+0xa0): In function 
`CConfigFile::CConfigFile[not-in-charge](QString const&)':
: undefined reference to `QString::shared_null'
...

You have two choices to fix this:

1. (Preferably) compile using Qt3 instead.
2. Build-Depend on and use the appropriate C++ compiler for Qt2 (see
http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.html for details).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 198534-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 01:48:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 19:48:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMRQ-000779-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:37 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7643D26B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:10:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B2018FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because i

Bug#214763: marked as done (gutenbrowser: Needs thorough spelling/grammar check for English)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2003 15:41:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 08 10:41:32 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.153] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A7GRP-0007p5-00; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:41:31 -0500
Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-58-120-156.twcny.rr.com [24.58.120.156])
by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id 
h98FfUU8027883;
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by doctormoo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DD8FA43EC8; Wed,  8 Oct 2003 11:41:31 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gutenbrowser: Needs thorough spelling/grammar check for English
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:41:31 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: gutenbrowser
Version: 3:0.6.8.3-2.1
Severity: minor

Almost every dialog box had either a spelling or grammar error; it's
really pointless listing them all.  Someone needs to run through all the
user-visible messages.  :-(

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux doctormoo 2.4.21-ncn.3 #1 SMP Sat Aug 16 22:46:19 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages gutenbrowser depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libqt2   3:2.3.1-22  Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2   1:2.95.4-17 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  unzip5.50-3  De-archiver for .zip files
ii  xlibs4.2.1-12.1  X Window System client libraries

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 214763-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 01:48:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 19:48:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMRQ-000779-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:37 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7643D26B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:10:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B2018FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was not
maintained, dead upstream and not usable.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#122471: marked as done (gutenbrowser: looking for /usr/share/gutenbrowser/COPYING)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2001 00:01:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 04 18:01:15 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sunny-legacy.pacific.net.au (sunny.pacific.net.au) 
[210.23.129.40] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16BPUw-00054G-00; Tue, 04 Dec 2001 18:01:14 -0600
Received: from wisma.pacific.net.au (wisma.pacific.net.au [210.23.129.72])
  by sunny.pacific.net.au with ESMTP
  id fB501CZM027523 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:01:12 
+1100 (EST)
Received: from localhost (ppp34.dyn228.pacific.net.au [203.143.228.34])
by wisma.pacific.net.au with ESMTP
id LAA26035 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:01:11 +1100 
(EST)
Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian))
id 16BPUL-00042B-00; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 10:00:37 +1000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gutenbrowser: looking for /usr/share/gutenbrowser/COPYING
From: Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 05 Dec 2001 10:00:34 +1000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 6
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gutenbrowser
Version: 3:0.6.8.3-2

When starting gutenbrowser (for the first time at least), it pops up a
dialog saying that it can't open /usr/share/gutenbrowser/COPYING.
Seems harmless, but probably not intended.

---
Received: (at 122471-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 01:48:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 19:48:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgMRQ-000779-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:37 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7643D26B24; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:10:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B2018FEEB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 + (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:11 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: ***

This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was not
maintained, dead upstream and not usable.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]