Bug#499577: PTS incorrectly claims base-passwd is LowNmu
Colin Watson wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > > http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu says: > > 38. Colin Watson - (all packages) - except: base-passwd - Comaintainers > welcome - check: base-passwd comaintainers are welcome > > However, http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/base-passwd.html says: > > Maintainer Colin Watson > MaintenanceLowNMU AFAIK currently it shows LowNMU with a link to the wiki page for all packages you maintain if you are listed on the wiki page as it was free text format. Though it does make sense to change that to comply with the new 'official' format that knows about 'except' etc. btw if you want a co-maintainer of base-passwd, I'm happy to help out. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#60810: marked as done (check for packages with the same files)
Your message dated Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:25:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#60810: Processed: this sounds like a nice problem to be solved with UDD :) has caused the Debian Bug report #60810, regarding check for packages with the same files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 60810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=60810 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: lintian Version: 1.11.2 Severity: wishlist The bot apt on openprojects.net IRC #debian has a handy database of the contents of all Debian packages. A nice optional feature for lintian would be to check whether any of the files in the package are owned by any other packages using a similar database, avoiding possible conflicts. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux moebius.student.cwru.edu 2.2.14 #5 Fri Feb 4 20:16:02 EST 2000 i686 unknown Versions of the packages lintian depends on: ii binutils 2.9.5.0.22-5 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti ii diffstat 1.27-1 produces graph of changes introduced by a di ii file 3.28-1 Determines file type using "magic" numbers perlNot installed or no info ii perl-5.005 5.005.03-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extracting and Report ^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Ralf, On Friday 19 September 2008 20:44, Ralf Treinen wrote: > These tests are curently run on a regular basis on the archive, see [1] for > a documentation. Detected bugs are filed with a usertag [2]. Wonderful. Thanks, Holger :-) pgpvWoDEjUdVy.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#499546: PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it is waiting in NEW
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:39:16AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > An example of where it does is batik: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/batik.html > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/batik_1.7-1.html Examples reported like that are useless, as the day someone will look at the issues the examples will not necessarily be still valid. Please *attach* the involved HTML pages *if* you want them to be useful as examples (in this particular case I doubt they are useful, as the problem is clear enough without examples). Still, thanks for the bugreport :-) Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the XML stuff is so ... simplistic -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#499546: PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it is waiting in NEW
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 05:46:39PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:39:16AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > An example of where it does is batik: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/batik.html > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/batik_1.7-1.html > > Examples reported like that are useless, as the day someone will look at > the issues the examples will not necessarily be still valid. Please > *attach* the involved HTML pages *if* you want them to be useful as > examples (in this particular case I doubt they are useful, as the > problem is clear enough without examples). > > Still, thanks for the bugreport :-) Hi, maybe you could take a look at #495226 and #496241. Thanks, Cristian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
