PAPT Package Status
While thinking about the migration of PAPT to git/salsa, I decided to take a quick look at the size of the task. Currently there are 199 packages in the PAPT svn. Of them, 27 have not been touched since jwilk did a mass commit for "Use canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields" four years ago. I suspect some of these are good candidates for orphaning (need a real human uploader/maintainer in addition to the team) or rm. If someone was interested in working on cleaning things up, those might be a decent place to start. Of these, a stack aren't in Debian anymore (part of dd-list output): E: Unknown package: trac-batchmodify E: Unknown package: harvestman E: Unknown package: zine E: Unknown package: mpdris E: Unknown package: pybackpack E: Unknown package: viridian E: Unknown package: google-sitemapgen E: Unknown package: emesene E: Unknown package: trac-git E: Unknown package: indywiki E: Unknown package: canto E: Unknown package: upnp-inspector dd-list of the remaining packages attached. I did no checking to see if these are in good shape or not (I recently uploaded a package that would have been on this list except upstream woke up after 6 years and released a new version, so just because it hasn't been touched, doesn't make it bad. Scott KCarl Chenet petit (U) rdiff-backup (U) Charlie Smotherman pythoncad (U) Cleto Martín atheist David Villa Alises atheist (U) Devid Antonio Filoni freealchemist Fabio Castelli gwakeonlan Francisco Moya atheist (U) Jeroen Schot ttb (U) Jerome Alet pkpgcounter (U) Johannes Ring doconce (U) ptex2tex (U) Julien Lavergne moap Kumar Appaiah pkpgcounter (U) Marc-Andre Lureau moap (U) Max Shinn writetype (U) Miriam Ruiz writetype (U) Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah mimms Python Applications Packaging Team doconce freealchemist (U) gwakeonlan (U) lightyears (U) lottanzb (U) mimms (U) moap (U) openstv (U) petit pkpgcounter ptex2tex pythoncad rdiff-backup ttb writetype Severin Heiniger lottanzb openstv Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals lightyears
Re: PAPT Package Status
On February 11, 2018 6:15:43 PM UTC, Scott Kitterman wrote: >While thinking about the migration of PAPT to git/salsa, I decided to >take a >quick look at the size of the task. Currently there are 199 packages >in the >PAPT svn. > >Of them, 27 have not been touched since jwilk did a mass commit for >"Use >canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields" four years ago. I suspect some of >these are >good candidates for orphaning (need a real human uploader/maintainer in > >addition to the team) or rm. If someone was interested in working on >cleaning >things up, those might be a decent place to start. > >Of these, a stack aren't in Debian anymore (part of dd-list output): Actually, that's not quite right. They aren't in unstable anymore. >E: Unknown package: trac-batchmodify >E: Unknown package: harvestman >E: Unknown package: zine >E: Unknown package: mpdris >E: Unknown package: pybackpack >E: Unknown package: viridian >E: Unknown package: google-sitemapgen >E: Unknown package: emesene >E: Unknown package: trac-git >E: Unknown package: indywiki >E: Unknown package: canto >E: Unknown package: upnp-inspector > >dd-list of the remaining packages attached. I did no checking to see >if these >are in good shape or not (I recently uploaded a package that would have >been >on this list except upstream woke up after 6 years and released a new >version, >so just because it hasn't been touched, doesn't make it bad. > >Scott K
Help needed for Python3 package python3-bd2k which does not install due to syntax error
Hi, the Debian Med team is working on python-bd2k[1] which builds fine and also runs build time tests. Unfortunately when trying to install python3-bd2k it fails with: ... File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/bd2k/util/exceptions.py", line 38 raise exc_type, exc_value, traceback ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/bd2k/util/test/test_panic.py", line 47 raise exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/bd2k/util/threading.py", line 65 raise type, value, traceback ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax ... I'm pretty sure that will ring a bell for some Python3 programmer and I hope to be able to fix this quickly with your help to be able to easily provide the Python3 version in addition to Python2. Thanks a lot Andreas. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/python-bd2k.git -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: Move to salsa? Merge modules and apps team?
Hi Piotr, On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 10:29:37AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > > And how about merging the modules and apps teams into one? > > If not separated at team level, I definitely want to have them somehow > separated at repository level so that it's clear which package is which > type or to easily checkout libraries only. If you ask me at least cython should go to Python Modules team. Its not really just a random Python application and strongly connected to several Python modules. I see other applications in python-apps that are for no reason there. We have no team C-apps or Perl-apps or ... LanguageX-apps. These are just random applications and could go to collab-maint (where the Git maintained packages of Python-apps team reside anyway). Just my 2 cents Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: pyapi-gitlab vs python-gitlab
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:43 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > i've contacted them in 2017-12 (via github), and afaict both projects > acknowleged the problem and rejected a solution :-( > > https://github.com/pyapi-gitlab/pyapi-gitlab/issues/263 > https://github.com/python-gitlab/python-gitlab/issues/385 Thanks for the links. The pyapi-gitlab upstream responded to my email and mentioned that he doesn't have time to maintain it and suggested that it would be fine for Debian to switch to python-github. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Re: Help needed for Python3 package python3-bd2k which does not install due to syntax error
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 11:47:37PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I'm pretty sure that will ring a bell for some Python3 programmer and I > hope to be able to fix this quickly with your help to be able to easily > provide the Python3 version in addition to Python2. The package code does not support python 3. You cannot "quickly fix" something like that. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
