On February 11, 2018 6:15:43 PM UTC, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: >While thinking about the migration of PAPT to git/salsa, I decided to >take a >quick look at the size of the task. Currently there are 199 packages >in the >PAPT svn. > >Of them, 27 have not been touched since jwilk did a mass commit for >"Use >canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields" four years ago. I suspect some of >these are >good candidates for orphaning (need a real human uploader/maintainer in > >addition to the team) or rm. If someone was interested in working on >cleaning >things up, those might be a decent place to start. > >Of these, a stack aren't in Debian anymore (part of dd-list output):
Actually, that's not quite right. They aren't in unstable anymore. >E: Unknown package: trac-batchmodify >E: Unknown package: harvestman >E: Unknown package: zine >E: Unknown package: mpdris >E: Unknown package: pybackpack >E: Unknown package: viridian >E: Unknown package: google-sitemapgen >E: Unknown package: emesene >E: Unknown package: trac-git >E: Unknown package: indywiki >E: Unknown package: canto >E: Unknown package: upnp-inspector > >dd-list of the remaining packages attached. I did no checking to see >if these >are in good shape or not (I recently uploaded a package that would have >been >on this list except upstream woke up after 6 years and released a new >version, >so just because it hasn't been touched, doesn't make it bad. > >Scott K
