Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages
Hi, On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Raphael, do you think that the upstream Django project might be willing to > make some kind of best practices for naming third party django packages? If > they did that, then that would give us a basis for Debian maintainers talking > to their upstreams about moving to django_. They already partly do that, see: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.10/intro/reusable-apps/#packaging-your-app They recommend a "django-" prefix in the PyPi package name. But they say nothing about the Python module name and the sample just bundles a "polls" module in a "django-polls" package. Thus I posted this to gather their feedback on the need to recommend the prefix on the name of the module too: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-developers/f8yNRkn6Fpo Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance
Hi Yaroslav, I just want to make some noise amongst Python experts about bug #846228. I admit I have no idea - but since there was no response for 10 days now several packages git a testing removal notice. I think python-joblib has several rdepends and thus it would IMHO be better maintained in DPMT than in a private Github repository. What do you think? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance
On December 7, 2016 6:09:56 AM EST, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Yaroslav, > >I just want to make some noise amongst Python experts about bug >#846228. >I admit I have no idea - but since there was no response for 10 days >now >several packages git a testing removal notice. > >I think python-joblib has several rdepends and thus it would IMHO be >better maintained in DPMT than in a private Github repository. What >do you think? > >Kind regards > > Andreas. I don't mind - anyone interested helping to move? Do you have a patch in mind by any chance for this specific issue?
Re: Bug#846228: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance
As for this particular issue -- I think I have complained upstream and it was addressed: https://github.com/joblib/joblib/issues/428 I will now see to build/upload current upstream snapshot -- codebase seems largely in maintenance mode ATM On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Yaroslav, > I just want to make some noise amongst Python experts about bug #846228. > I admit I have no idea - but since there was no response for 10 days now > several packages git a testing removal notice. > I think python-joblib has several rdepends and thus it would IMHO be > better maintained in DPMT than in a private Github repository. What > do you think? > Kind regards > Andreas. -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
