Hi, On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Raphael, do you think that the upstream Django project might be willing to > make some kind of best practices for naming third party django packages? If > they did that, then that would give us a basis for Debian maintainers talking > to their upstreams about moving to django_.
They already partly do that, see: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.10/intro/reusable-apps/#packaging-your-app They recommend a "django-" prefix in the PyPi package name. But they say nothing about the Python module name and the sample just bundles a "polls" module in a "django-polls" package. Thus I posted this to gather their feedback on the need to recommend the prefix on the name of the module too: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-developers/f8yNRkn6Fpo Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
