Help About: to propose package
Hi, I learn to create my first new package (tremulous-mappack). I've finished to create it and download to ftp//mentors.debian.net. What must I do now to continue integration process ? Why my package isn't to "My Packages" view ? Why don't I received email confirmation ? Where can I say "Need Sponsor = Yes" ? Is my package too big ? Sorry for my basic questions ... Thanks and have a nice day. @+ Salokine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help About: to propose package
Hi, I learn to create my first new package (tremulous-mappack). I've finished to create it and download to ftp//mentors.debian.net. What must I do now to continue integration process ? Why my package isn't to "My Packages" view ? Why don't I received email confirmation ? Where can I say "Need Sponsor = Yes" ? Is my package too big ? Sorry for my basic questions ... Thanks and have a nice day. @+ Salokine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beginner Maintainer: tremulous-editor, tremulous-mappack
Dear Debian Developers, I am looking for a sponsor to control my fist packages. This is my first attempt, so I need help to control integrity of my packages. Can you tell me what is wrong and what is it recommended (or not) in my packages or in my approach? * * Package name : tremulous-mappack Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.bricosoft.com * License : GPL Programming Lang: GtkRadiant (1.5.0), Q3Map (1.0), Q3Map-ydnar (2.5.16) Description : Bricosoft's Official maps for Tremulous game To install tremulous-editor, I need gtkradiant package managed by Frits Daalmans. I think he's currently waiting for upload his package too. * * Package name : tremulous-editor Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Tim Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.tremulous.net * License : GPL Programming Lang: xml, GTK Radiant Description : This package configure GTK Radiant for Tremulous game * ... Sorry for my poor english language. Thanks Salokine Terata. FRANCE pgp7eY881AwO9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Beginner Maintainer: tremulous-editor, tremulous-mappack
Hi and thanks for your answer, > you need to give us a URL where we can review the source package. You can find it on Debian Mentors web site: Package Name: tremulous-editor Repository URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor Package Name: tremulous-mappack Repository URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-mappack Bye. Salokine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Beginner Maintainer: tremulous-editor, tremulous-mappack
Hi, I'm sorry for this long silence, I'll work on this package this week-end. (last week it was my birthday ... ) I'm very interesting to continue these packages ! Thanks. Salokine pgp5QQYbqwhMU.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: tremulous-editor
Hi Daniel,
I prefer to finish tremulous-editor package before continue with
tremulous-package.
Thank you for important help. Have a nice Week-end.
Salokine.
Next, my answers:
Le mercredi 29 novembre 2006 01:58, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor
> at least give the URI to the *.dsc, i don't want to fire up
> ${www-browser} just because of you.
OK: The full URL of .dsc (new version)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor/tremulous-editor_0.0.20060518.dsc
> * package should be non-native.
OK: Package is now non-native
> * README and README.Debian are useless, doesn't contain any
> information at all.
OK: Files deleted
> * why priority extra?
OK: Package is now setting to optional priority
> * it should be debhelper (>= 5), not debhelper (>=5),
> and tremulous (>= 1.1.0), gtkradiant (>= 1.5.0)
> not tremulous (>=1.1.0), gtkradiant (>=1.5.0).
OK: First space is adding
> * short and long descriptions must be improved/extended a lot.
OK
> * do you have no own website, do you really want to do the primary
> distribution through ftp.debian.org?
??: My own site don't speak about tremulous (see salokine.hd.free.fr ;-) )
I have insert the official wiki which explains how to do manualy
what I do with this package. Is it good ?
> * your copyright is incomplete, there is other code with different
> authors/license in the tarball. you need to list that too. look
> at tineyerp-client from unstable for an example how to do
> multi-authors/multi-license copyright files properly.
??: I'm not sure. I think I need help on this section. I couldn't find
tineyerp-client package. I saw "tremulous" package as exemple.
But I don't know what licence to use and
upstream author don't answer to my email
(Tim Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>).
> * dirs is useless here.
OK: "debian/dirs" deleted
> * docs is empty, hence useless.
OK: "debian/docs" deleted
> * your package is only building one binary-package, hence i do
> recommend to not mix prefixed helpers and not prefixed.
> therefore, rename tremulous-editor.dirs to dirs.
OK
> * remove the commented useless things in rules
OK
> * if you don't do something in configure:, remove it completely.
OK
> * if you don't do something in buid:, replace it with this:
>
> ---snip---
> build:
> ---snap---
OK
> * remove the commented useless dh_* calls.
OK
Many thanks and good night.
Salokine.
pgpU0dYKzdX2N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Fwd: Re: Beginner Maintainer: tremulous-editor, tremulous-mappack
Salut, As-tu pu voir mon paquet tremulous-editor ? J'ai des difficultés pour déterminer le fichier debian/copyright et je n'arrive pas à contacter les développeurs de Tremulous. As-tu des contacts ? @+ et merci de ton aide. Salokine. Le jeudi 30 novembre 2006 00:37, Heretik a écrit : > Salokine a écrit : > > Bonjour, > > > > Voici le recap de la discussion sur . > > Ok, je vais lire tout ça > > > Je suis à ta disposition pour en discuter. > > As tu un compte Jabber ? Je ne détaille pas trop mes réponses car je > préfère en parler sur Jabber que par courriel, parce que c'est plus > réactif et donc plus agréable. > > Moi c'est [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > J'accepte aussi volontier de l'aide > > sur la création de ces paquets car, comme dit précédement, ce sont mes > > premiers paquets. > > Oui, je vais regarder tout ça et essayer de t'aider.
Re: Fwd: Re: Beginner Maintainer: tremulous-editor, tremulous-mappack
Hi, I'm sorry, it's an error of email address. You can ignore it. Bye. Salokine. Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 08:07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit : > Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 02:23, Andrew Donnellan a écrit : > > Could this be translated into English? > > > > On 12/20/06, Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Salut, > > Hi > > > > As-tu pu voir mon paquet tremulous-editor ? > > Did you have a look to tremulous-editor ? > > > > J'ai des difficultés pour déterminer le fichier debian/copyright et je > > > n'arrive pas à contacter les développeurs de Tremulous. > > I don't manage to fill debian/copyright and I can't contact tremulous > developpers. > > > > As-tu des contacts ? > > Do you have any contact ? (with the tremulous guys, I guess) > > > > @+ et merci de ton aide. > > > Salokine. > > > > > > Le jeudi 30 novembre 2006 00:37, Heretik a écrit : > > > > Salokine a écrit : > > > > > Bonjour, > > > > > > > > > > Voici le recap de la discussion sur > > > > > . > > > > > > > > Ok, je vais lire tout ça > > > > > > > > > Je suis à ta disposition pour en discuter. > > > > > > > > As tu un compte Jabber ? Je ne détaille pas trop mes réponses car je > > > > préfère en parler sur Jabber que par courriel, parce que c'est plus > > > > réactif et donc plus agréable. > > > > > > > > Moi c'est [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > J'accepte aussi volontier de l'aide > > > > > sur la création de ces paquets car, comme dit précédement, ce sont > > > > > mes premiers paquets. > > > > > > > > Oui, je vais regarder tout ça et essayer de t'aider.
Re: Beginner Maintainer: tremulous-editor, tremulous-mappack
Le mardi 2 janvier 2007 12:55, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> what is the current state?
Hi,
I think maybe you don't receive my last message "RFS: tremulous-editor" (see
the end of this message for the copy of original message).
I have no answer about licence to use. Upstream author don't contact me. How
can I proceed ?
I have send the next email to:
- Damien Laniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: He's Maintener of "tremulous" Dedian
Package (http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tremulous.html)
- Tim Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Official Upstream author
- Official Forum of Termulous:
http://tremulous.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2810&highlight=salokine&sid=81a87023f53aedf8644d65254eae6c18
- Official Maillist of Developers:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=31197265&forum_id=45515
What can i do !!
****Message (Begin)
> Package Debian: tremulous-editor
> From: Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 2006-12-08 13:53
> Hi,
>
> I'm working to create "tremulous-editor" package on Linux/Debian system.
> This package configure GTK-Radiant for Tremulous following
> http://tremmapping.pbwiki.com/GtkRadiant1_5-Linux instructions
>
> I'm using these two files:
>
> - http://www.clanopener.com/catalyc/trem_stuff.zip
> - http://www.clanopener.com/catalyc/trem.game_1.5.zip
>
> I must create non-native package (including official source code)
> Can you say me where I could find official release of these files ? >
> (homepage,
> CVS ...etc).
>
> Can you give me more informations about :
> - Upstream Authors (Tim Angus, Eutectic ?)
> - Copyright/Licence (nothing in this files)
>
> Who can help me for other questions about "tremulous-editor" ?
>
> Thanks for your answers.
>
> Good evening.
> Salokine.
> FRANCE.
Message (End)
Except this point, I think my package is Ok ?
I'll work on tremulous-mappack only after this package (tremoulus-editor) is Ok.
Have an nice day and thanks for your help Daniel.
@+
Salokine
My Previous message:
-- Message transmis --
Subject: RFS: tremulous-editor
Date: samedi 9 décembre 2006 02:15
From: Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Mentors ML
Cc: Tim Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Heretik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Daniel,
I prefer to finish tremulous-editor package before continue with
tremulous-package.
Thank you for important help. Have a nice Week-end.
Salokine.
Next, my answers:
Le mercredi 29 novembre 2006 01:58, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor
>
> at least give the URI to the *.dsc, i don't want to fire up
> ${www-browser} just because of you.
OK: The full URL of .dsc (new version)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor/tremulous-edito
r_0.0.20060518.dsc
> * package should be non-native.
OK: Package is now non-native
> * README and README.Debian are useless, doesn't contain any
> information at all.
OK: Files deleted
> * why priority extra?
OK: Package is now setting to optional priority
> * it should be debhelper (>= 5), not debhelper (>=5),
> and tremulous (>= 1.1.0), gtkradiant (>= 1.5.0)
> not tremulous (>=1.1.0), gtkradiant (>=1.5.0).
OK: First space is adding
> * short and long descriptions must be improved/extended a lot.
OK
> * do you have no own website, do you really want to do the primary
> distribution through ftp.debian.org?
??: My own site don't speak about tremulous (see salokine.hd.free.fr ;-) )
I have insert the official wiki which explains how to do manualy
what I do with this package. Is it good ?
> * your copyright is incomplete, there is other code with different
> authors/license in the tarball. you need to list that too. look
> at tineyerp-client from unstable for an example how to do
> multi-authors/multi-license copyright files properly.
??: I'm not sure. I think I need help on this section. I couldn't find
tineyerp-client package. I saw "tremulous" package as exemple.
But I don't know what licence to use and
upstream author don't answer to my email
(Tim Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>).
> * dirs is useless here.
OK: "debian/dirs" deleted
> * docs is empty, hence useless.
OK: "debian/docs" deleted
> * your package is only building one binary-package, hence i do
> recommend to not mix prefixed helpers and not prefixed.
> therefore, rename tremulous-editor.dirs to dirs.
OK
> * remove the commented useless things in rules
OK
> * if you don't do something in configure:, remove it completely.
OK
> * if you don't do something in buid:, replace it with this:
>
> ---snip---
> build:
> ---snap---
OK
> * remove the commented useless dh_* calls.
OK
Many thanks and good night.
Salokine.
---
pgpbrMGyu1ngV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Beginner Maintainer: tremulous-editor, tremulous-mappack*
Dear Debian Developpers
I have no answer again from authors about licence to use.
I tried many kind of solutions (forum, mail, maillist) ... no reply.
I can't continue, I'm VERY sorry.
I decide to stop to try to create tremulous-editor et tremulous-mappack
packages ;-(
If someone can find how to write this debian/licence file, contact me to my
personal email ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If someone want to continue my work, you can do it.
Special thank to Daniel. Sorry, and I hope to meet you for another package.
Bye.
Salokine.[FR]
PS: I'll unscribe me from debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Le mardi 2 janvier 2007 14:56, Salokine a écrit :
> Le mardi 2 janvier 2007 12:55, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> > what is the current state?
>
> Hi,
>
> I think maybe you don't receive my last message "RFS: tremulous-editor"
> (see the end of this message for the copy of original message).
>
> I have no answer about licence to use. Upstream author don't contact me.
> How can I proceed ?
>
> I have send the next email to:
> - Damien Laniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: He's Maintener of "tremulous"
> Dedian Package (http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tremulous.html) - Tim Angus
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Official Upstream author - Official Forum
> of Termulous:
> http://tremulous.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2810&highlight=salo
>kine&sid=81a87023f53aedf8644d65254eae6c18 - Official Maillist of Developers:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=31197265&forum_id=45
>515
>
> What can i do !!
>
> Message (Begin)
>
> > Package Debian: tremulous-editor
> > From: Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 2006-12-08 13:53
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm working to create "tremulous-editor" package on Linux/Debian system.
> > This package configure GTK-Radiant for Tremulous following
> > http://tremmapping.pbwiki.com/GtkRadiant1_5-Linux instructions
> >
> > I'm using these two files:
> >
> > - http://www.clanopener.com/catalyc/trem_stuff.zip
> > - http://www.clanopener.com/catalyc/trem.game_1.5.zip
> >
> > I must create non-native package (including official source code)
> > Can you say me where I could find official release of these files ? >
> > (homepage, CVS ...etc).
> >
> > Can you give me more informations about :
> > - Upstream Authors (Tim Angus, Eutectic ?)
> > - Copyright/Licence (nothing in this files)
> >
> > Who can help me for other questions about "tremulous-editor" ?
> >
> > Thanks for your answers.
> >
> > Good evening.
> > Salokine.
> > FRANCE.
>
> Message (End)
>
> Except this point, I think my package is Ok ?
>
> I'll work on tremulous-mappack only after this package (tremoulus-editor)
> is Ok.
>
>
> Have an nice day and thanks for your help Daniel.
>
> @+
> Salokine
>
>
> My Previous message:
>
> -- Message transmis --
>
> Subject: RFS: tremulous-editor
> Date: samedi 9 décembre 2006 02:15
> From: Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian Mentors ML
> Cc: Tim Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Heretik
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I prefer to finish tremulous-editor package before continue with
> tremulous-package.
>
> Thank you for important help. Have a nice Week-end.
>
> Salokine.
>
>
> Next, my answers:
>
> Le mercredi 29 novembre 2006 01:58, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor
> >
> > at least give the URI to the *.dsc, i don't want to fire up
> > ${www-browser} just because of you.
>
> OK: The full URL of .dsc (new version)
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor/tremulous-edi
>to r_0.0.20060518.dsc
>
> > * package should be non-native.
>
> OK: Package is now non-native
>
> > * README and README.Debian are useless, doesn't contain any
> > information at all.
>
> OK: Files deleted
>
> > * why priority extra?
>
> OK: Package is now setting to optional priority
>
> > * it should be debhelper (>= 5), not debhelper (>=5),
> > and tremulous (>= 1.1.0), gtkradiant (>= 1.5.0)
> > not tremulous (>=1.1.0), gtkradiant (>=1.5.0).
>
> OK: First space is adding
>
> > * short and long descriptions must be improved/extended a lot.
>
> OK
>
> > * do you have no own website, do you really want to do the primary
> > distribution through ftp.debian.org?
>
> ??: My
Searching tool before to start to create it
Dear Mentors, Before to start to create a new package, I'd like to ask you: Does it already exist. The goal of this tools is to work like initscripts mechanism. A program like "initd" could accept command-line like this: initd [DIRECTORY] [OPTION] ... [DIRECTORY] = directory contains scripts (not daemon style) [OPTION] = command to give to deamons. Why I need it ? My provider have created a suite of program not like as deamons To start this application, I need to load each scripts (and respect the order). To stop this applications, I need to kill each process (and respect the opposite order) With the "initd" concept, I could control initialisation of all application with only one command (very useful because it must work with DRBD !) Is this program "initd-like" does already exist ? Otherwise, I think to use "run-parts" and "start-stop-daemon" tools to create my program. What name is more appropriate for this tool ? Initialize Directory as Daemons : initdd, initd, dinit ? Thank you for your help or your point of view and reflexions. Sorry for my poor english... Salokine FRANCE -- pgpRwFDQJjHwo.pgp Description: PGP signature
