Dear Debian Developpers I have no answer again from authors about licence to use. I tried many kind of solutions (forum, mail, maillist) ... no reply.
I can't continue, I'm VERY sorry. I decide to stop to try to create tremulous-editor et tremulous-mappack packages .... ;-( If someone can find how to write this debian/licence file, contact me to my personal email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) If someone want to continue my work, you can do it. Special thank to Daniel. Sorry, and I hope to meet you for another package. Bye. Salokine.[FR] PS: I'll unscribe me from debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Le mardi 2 janvier 2007 14:56, Salokine a écrit : > Le mardi 2 janvier 2007 12:55, Daniel Baumann a écrit : > > what is the current state? > > Hi, > > I think maybe you don't receive my last message "RFS: tremulous-editor" > (see the end of this message for the copy of original message). > > I have no answer about licence to use. Upstream author don't contact me. > How can I proceed ? > > I have send the next email to: > - Damien Laniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: He's Maintener of "tremulous" > Dedian Package (http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tremulous.html) - Tim Angus > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Official Upstream author - Official Forum > of Termulous: > http://tremulous.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2810&highlight=salo >kine&sid=81a87023f53aedf8644d65254eae6c18 - Official Maillist of Developers: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=31197265&forum_id=45 >515 > > What can i do !! > > ****************Message (Begin) > > > Package Debian: tremulous-editor > > From: Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 2006-12-08 13:53 > > Hi, > > > > I'm working to create "tremulous-editor" package on Linux/Debian system. > > This package configure GTK-Radiant for Tremulous following > > http://tremmapping.pbwiki.com/GtkRadiant1_5-Linux instructions > > > > I'm using these two files: > > > > - http://www.clanopener.com/catalyc/trem_stuff.zip > > - http://www.clanopener.com/catalyc/trem.game_1.5.zip > > > > I must create non-native package (including official source code) > > Can you say me where I could find official release of these files ? > > > (homepage, CVS ...etc). > > > > Can you give me more informations about : > > - Upstream Authors (Tim Angus, Eutectic ?) > > - Copyright/Licence (nothing in this files) > > > > Who can help me for other questions about "tremulous-editor" ? > > > > Thanks for your answers. > > > > Good evening. > > Salokine. > > FRANCE. > > ****************Message (End) > > Except this point, I think my package is Ok ? > > I'll work on tremulous-mappack only after this package (tremoulus-editor) > is Ok. > > > Have an nice day and thanks for your help Daniel. > > @+ > Salokine > > > My Previous message: > > ---------- Message transmis ---------- > > Subject: RFS: tremulous-editor > Date: samedi 9 décembre 2006 02:15 > From: Salokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian Mentors ML <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org> > Cc: Tim Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Heretik > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi Daniel, > > I prefer to finish tremulous-editor package before continue with > tremulous-package. > > Thank you for important help. Have a nice Week-end. > > Salokine. > > > Next, my answers: > > Le mercredi 29 novembre 2006 01:58, Daniel Baumann a écrit : > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor > > > > at least give the URI to the *.dsc, i don't want to fire up > > ${www-browser} just because of you. > > OK: The full URL of .dsc (new version) > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor/tremulous-edi >to r_0.0.20060518.dsc > > > * package should be non-native. > > OK: Package is now non-native > > > * README and README.Debian are useless, doesn't contain any > > information at all. > > OK: Files deleted > > > * why priority extra? > > OK: Package is now setting to optional priority > > > * it should be debhelper (>= 5), not debhelper (>=5), > > and tremulous (>= 1.1.0), gtkradiant (>= 1.5.0) > > not tremulous (>=1.1.0), gtkradiant (>=1.5.0). > > OK: First space is adding > > > * short and long descriptions must be improved/extended a lot. > > OK > > > * do you have no own website, do you really want to do the primary > > distribution through ftp.debian.org? > > ??: My own site don't speak about tremulous (see salokine.hd.free.fr ;-) ) > I have insert the official wiki which explains how to do manualy > what I do with this package. Is it good ? > > > * your copyright is incomplete, there is other code with different > > authors/license in the tarball. you need to list that too. look > > at tineyerp-client from unstable for an example how to do > > multi-authors/multi-license copyright files properly. > > ??: I'm not sure. I think I need help on this section. I couldn't find > tineyerp-client package. I saw "tremulous" package as exemple. > But I don't know what licence to use and > upstream author don't answer to my email > (Tim Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). > > > * dirs is useless here. > > OK: "debian/dirs" deleted > > > * docs is empty, hence useless. > > OK: "debian/docs" deleted > > > * your package is only building one binary-package, hence i do > > recommend to not mix prefixed helpers and not prefixed. > > therefore, rename tremulous-editor.dirs to dirs. > > OK > > > * remove the commented useless things in rules > > OK > > > * if you don't do something in configure:, remove it completely. > > OK > > > * if you don't do something in buid:, replace it with this: > > > > ---snip--- > > build: > > ---snap--- > > OK > > > * remove the commented useless dh_* calls. > > OK > > Many thanks and good night. > Salokine. > > -------------------------------------------------------
pgpGy0ZDSsCda.pgp
Description: PGP signature
