[fwd: call for participation - Debian contributors survey, 1st ed.]
This was originally posted to debian-devel-announce yesterday. It has been suggested (thank you Sean!) to forward it to -mentors, in order to reach out to all packager contributors (both mentors and mentees) that are on this list and might not follow other Debian lists. Cheers. - Forwarded message from Stefano Zacchiroli - TL;DR: all Debian contributors --- from bug reporters to Debian project members and participants in any Debian team --- are invited to take part in the first edition of the Debian contributors survey. To participate visit: http://debian.limequery.org/696747 The deadline for participation is: 4 December 2016, at 23:59 UTC. This is the first instance of what we hope will become a recurring annual survey of Debian contributors. The survey is intended to help the Debian project and community by enabling them to understand and document the evolution of the project's population over time, through the lenses of common demographics. In addition, each year the survey will explore a specific aspect of the project. The focus for this first edition is on work and labour issues, specifically on the extent to which Debian contributors are volunteers or paid to work on Debian, and on how that affects their contributions. Participation in the survey is completely anonymous, with no logging of any provenance information (e.g., IP address, HTTP referrer), and all questions are optional. The survey is conducted using the Free Software platform LimeSurvey and hosted by LimeSurvey.org. The results of the survey will be analyzed as part of ongoing research work by the organizers and released in aggregate form only. A report discussing the results will be published under a DFSG-free license and distributed to the Debian community as soon as it's ready. The raw, disaggregated answers will not be distributed and will be processed under the responsibility of the organizers. The survey will remain open until: 4 December 2016, 23:59 UTC. If you have any questions, you can always reach the survey organizers at: - Mathieu ONeil (mathieu.on...@canberra.edu.au) - Molly de Blanc (debl...@riseup.net) - Stefano Zacchiroli (z...@debian.org) We thank you in advance for your participation! For the organizers, - End forwarded message - -- Stefano Zacchiroli . z...@upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#843604: marked as done (RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC])
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:48:16 + (UTC) with message-id <229291342.416583.1478598496...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#843604: RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #843604, regarding RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843604 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xerces-c" * Package name: xerces-c Version : 3.1.4+debian-1 Upstream Author : Xerces-C developers * URL : https://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/ * License : Apache 2.0 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libxerces-c-dev - validating XML parser library for C++ (development files) libxerces-c-doc - validating XML parser library for C++ (documentation) libxerces-c-samples - validating XML parser library for C++ (compiled samples) libxerces-c3.1 - validating XML parser library for C++ To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xerces-c Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xerces-c/xerces-c_3.1.4+debian-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/ Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * Removed patches that are no longer needed (applied upstream) * Compile with curl support to allow accessing https urls. Closes: #821380 * Added patch to fix some compiler warnings (forwarded upstream) In addition, I'm hopeful that the new upstream release will resolve the FTBFS issue on s390x (bug 833754), however I don't know that for sure. Regards, Bill Blough --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- control: close 843599 control: close 843596 control: close 843592 > In addition, I'm hopeful that the new upstream release will resolve the > FTBFS issue on s390x (bug 833754), however I don't know that for sure. lets see G.--- End Message ---
Re: Bug#843604: RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC]
Le 08/11/2016 à 04:40, Bill Blough a écrit : > Package: sponsorship-requests > It builds those binary packages: > > libxerces-c-dev - validating XML parser library for C++ (development files) > libxerces-c-doc - validating XML parser library for C++ (documentation) > libxerces-c-samples - validating XML parser library for C++ (compiled > samples) > libxerces-c3.1 - validating XML parser library for C++ > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > Changes since the last upload: > > * New upstream release Aren't we supposed to be in a transition-freeze now? If the transition freeze is effective, uploading this to unstable will severely hinder work on any package that build-depends on xerces-c.
Re: Bug#843604: RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC]
Le 08/11/2016 à 10:56, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > > If the transition freeze is effective, uploading this to unstable will > severely hinder work on any package that build-depends on xerces-c. > Or maybe not. No SONAME bump, no problem. Sorry for the noise.
ITP's not showing up on debian-devel?
Hi Everyone, I recently posted two ITP's http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843325 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843570 The confirmation message said that they would be forwarded to debian-devel, but it has been a while and I do not see either of them there. Did I mess something up in the ITP, is there some moderation queue, or are my emails getting eaten? Thank you, Walter Landry
Re: ITP's not showing up on debian-devel?
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 11:28:55PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I recently posted two ITP's > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843325 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843570 > > The confirmation message said that they would be forwarded to > debian-devel, but it has been a while and I do not see either of them > there. Did I mess something up in the ITP, is there some moderation > queue, or are my emails getting eaten? Your emails are getting eaten. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/11/msg00281.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/11/msg00282.html -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#843604: RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC]
Hi Thibaut! >Or maybe not. No SONAME bump, no problem. Sorry for the noise. yes, the new release is mostly about: including CVE patches, updating autoconf files (useless for us). I checked for ABI changes, and I found none. Please let me know if any reverse-dependency breaks, even if I don't think this will be the case! thanks G.
Re: ITP's not showing up on debian-devel?
Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 11:28:55PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I recently posted two ITP's >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843325 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843570 >> >> The confirmation message said that they would be forwarded to >> debian-devel, but it has been a while and I do not see either of them >> there. Did I mess something up in the ITP, is there some moderation >> queue, or are my emails getting eaten? > Your emails are getting eaten. > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/11/msg00281.html > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/11/msg00282.html No, they don't. The two mails you refer to were manually (re-)sent (bounced) by me, not by the bug system (check the "Resent-From:" header). Cheers Ole
Re: Build a sort-of-systemd-dependent package on kfreebsd
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 10:39, Alec Leamas wrote: > I'm now trying to wrap my head around how to conditionalize a packet > such as lirc. I'm coming from Fedora/RPM and used to just spread some > %ifarch in the spec file. Now, is something similar possible in debian? It should be possible, yes. I am not the best one to explain how, so I will leave the actual answer to someone that could do it better. That said, I think you could get either better (or faster) help on debian-mentors@lists.debian.org (which I added to Cc:). It is a list specific to help new maintainers, and doubts about packaging corner cases are routinely handled there. -- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Bug#843636: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi/3.22.14, ITP: 843633 -- disconnect wifi extension for GNOME shell
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi": * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi Version : 3.22.14 Upstream Author : Gopi Sankar Karmegam * URL : https://github.com/kgshank/gse-disconnect-wifi * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: JavaScript Description : disconnect wifi extension for GNOME shell It builds the following binary package: gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi - disconnect wifi extension for GNOME shell To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi/gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi_3.22.14-1.dsc You can also find me (highvoltage) on #debian-mentors. Thanks for your time and patience! -Jonathan
Re: Build a sort-of-systemd-dependent package on kfreebsd
Cc'ing the entire message to debian-mendors. Sorry for the screw-up, I CC'd something that did not have enough context for any useful help. On Tue, 08 Nov 2016, Alec Leamas wrote: > We are about to push the new lirc to stable. As-is, the package declares a > dependency on systemd and thus rightfully fails to build on kfreebsd > platforms. This is a pity since the core software lirc builds fine at least > on FreeBSD 10.3. > > However, lirc contains all sorts of systemd stuff: tweaks in > rules/dh_auto_install, systemd configuration files, one or two tools. The > configure script copes with all this and builds a different set of files on > freebsd. > > I'm now trying to wrap my head around how to conditionalize a packet such as > lirc. I'm coming from Fedora/RPM and used to just spread some > %ifarch in the spec file. Now, is something similar possible in debian? > > In particular: > - How can I handle that kfreebsd should install a different set of files? > - Is it possible to conditionalize the rules file w r t platform? > - If so, how? -- Henrique Holschuh
Re: Build a sort-of-systemd-dependent package on kfreebsd
On 08/11/16 14:13, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 10:39, Alec Leamas wrote: I'm now trying to wrap my head around how to conditionalize a packet such as lirc. I'm coming from Fedora/RPM and used to just spread some %ifarch in the spec file. Now, is something similar possible in debian? That said, I think you could get either better (or faster) help on debian-mentors@lists.debian.org (which I added to Cc:). It is a list specific to help new maintainers, and doubts about packaging corner cases are routinely handled there. Thanks for reply. That said, I'm aware of both lists and posting to devel was a deliberate choice. So, if anyone has an actual reply on the original post [1], please reply on -devel so we don't run into cross-posting problems. Cheers! --alec [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/11/msg00288.html
Re: Build a sort-of-systemd-dependent package on kfreebsd
Hi Alec [answering on debian-mentors] On 08.11.2016 13:39, Alec Leamas wrote: > In particular: > - How can I handle that kfreebsd should install a different set of files? Never done that, but I guess use dh-exec filtering in the debian/*.install files. > - Is it possible to conditionalize the rules file w r t platform? > - If so, how? debian/rules: ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS), kfreebsd) ... endif debian/control (don't depend on package foo on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64): foo [!kfreebsd-any] Greets jre
Re: Building package under kfreebsd/hurd
Thanks!. I will try your suggestions. Best regards. Elías On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 11/07/2016 12:46 AM, Elías Alejandro wrote: >> I wonder if there's a way to build packages for distinct >> architectures, specifically for >> Hurd or Kfreebsd. Do I have to create a new installation or use qemu?. > > In my experience the easiest way to do so is to use a virtual > machine (I prefer libvirt + virt-manager with Qemu for that), > boot the machine, install an SSH server and > > In the case of Hurd, you really don't want to use that on your > bare-metal hardware, because last time I checked it didn't > support USB yet. (If you don't need USB you can of course use > it. ;-)) kFreeBSD is not a problem in that regard, but unless > your system is really RAM-starved a VM is still much easier to > handle. > > Note that it's not completely trivial to set up these machines. > The problem is that most installation media you can find are > a bit older, and if you've ever tried to install testing/sid > with an older installer, you can see that it often doesn't > quite work because sid will have moved on quite a bit. Plus > a lot of the documentation you find is a bit outdated for > both archs - there is more current documentation, but when > searching you more often than not find the outdated docs in > my experience, before you find the current ones. > > In the case of Hurd Samuel Thibault provides premade images > you can use: > https://people.debian.org/~sthibault/hurd-i386/README > https://people.debian.org/~sthibault/hurd-i386/ > I suspect that's going to be the easiest way of setting up a > VM there. (Please do a dist-upgraded before you actually use > them to try stuff though, they are relatively up to date, but > aren't daily images.) > > In the case of kFreeBSD, I'm not completely sure anymore, > but if I remember correctly, I used the Jessie rc3 installer > to install the VM and then dist-upgraded to sid (by changing > the sources.list): > http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/jessie_di_rc3/kfreebsd-amd64/iso-cd/ > (That may or may not work, depending on whether I remember > correctly.) > > In both cases (Hurd, kFreeBSD) please be aware that while a > lot of the everyday userland is still the same as with the > Linux ports (e.g. ls, cp, etc.), many administrative commands > are quite different or at least have different options / a > different output. Especially Hurd can be quite weird when you > first come in contact with it; once you get to know some of > the concepts and ideas behind it, it's actually really cool, > but there's a bit of a learning curve there. > > Hope that helps. > >> [1]https://wiki.debian.org/qemubuilder > > I haven't tried that yet, but from reading the wiki page it > looks to me that it's mostly a Linux thing - and while there > is no inherent reason why fully-fledged VMs with Hurd or > kFreeBSD wouldn't work in principle with something like that, > I suspect that you'd need to fix a lot of things to make it > work. (I may be wrong though.) It's probably easier to just > use a virtual machine manually yourself. > > Regards, > Christian
Bug#843657: RFS: node-typescript/2.0.8-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-typescript" * Package name: node-typescript Version : 2.0.8-1 Upstream Author : Microsoft Corp. * URL : http://typescriptlang.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-typescript - TypeScript is a language for application scale JavaScript develop To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-typescript Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-typescript/node-typescript_2.0.8-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-typescript.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-typescript.git It's just an update to the latest _stable_ upstream (yes, uscan says 2.1.1 is more recent -- but 2.0.8 is the one to package!). Thanks, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#843659: RFS: node-source-map-support/0.4.6+ds-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-source-map-support" * Package name: node-source-map-support Version : 0.4.6+ds-1 Upstream Author : Ewan Wallace * URL : https://github.com/evanw/node-source-map-support * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-source-map-support - Fixes stack traces for files with source maps To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-source-map-support Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-source-map-support/node-source-map-support_0.4.6+ds-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-source-map-support.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-source-map-support.git This is just a new upstream release. Thanks, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#843660: RFS: node-ast-types/0.9.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-ast-types" * Package name: node-ast-types Version : 0.9.1-1 Upstream Author : Ben Newman * URL : http://github.com/benjamn/ast-types * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-ast-types - Esprima-compatible implementation of the Mozilla JS Parser API To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-ast-types Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-ast-types/node-ast-types_0.9.1-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-ast-types.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-ast-types.git It is mostly a new upstream release (I also bumped dh compat to 10). Thanks, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#843583: RFS: imagemagick/8:6.9.6.2+dfsg-3
control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:49:52PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick" Hi Bastien! Please, avoid using Cc to notify people of bugs, use x-debbugs-cc instead... > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/imagemagick/imagemagick_6.9.6.2+dfsg-3.dsc I was doing the thing via git, but I noticed a difference. In 0520b5304334d3da89efe5a8b2c6496603e62fd0 I can see this: -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9.20151219), I can't really explain that, but I also find interesting that in the .dsc I got from mentors the build-dep is on >= 10. See the attached diff of your-dsc my-dsc -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- diffstat for imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg control|2 +- control.d/noquantum.in |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -Nru imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg/debian/control imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg/debian/control --- imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg/debian/control 2016-11-06 12:51:44.0 + +++ imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg/debian/control 2016-11-06 12:51:44.0 + @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Vincent Fourmond Standards-Version: 3.9.8 # for dbg-sym -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9.20151219), # for improving build dh-exec, dh-autoreconf, # for linking compiling ... diff -Nru imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg/debian/control.d/noquantum.in imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg/debian/control.d/noquantum.in --- imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg/debian/control.d/noquantum.in 2016-11-06 12:51:44.0 + +++ imagemagick-6.9.6.2+dfsg/debian/control.d/noquantum.in 2016-11-06 12:51:44.0 + @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Vincent Fourmond Standards-Version: 3.9.8 # for dbg-sym -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9.20151219), # for improving build dh-exec, dh-autoreconf, # for linking compiling ... signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#843661: RFS: node-graceful-fs/4.1.10-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-graceful-fs" * Package name: node-graceful-fs Version : 4.1.10-1 Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter, Ben Noordhuis and contributors * URL : https://github.com/isaacs/node-graceful-fs * License : ISC Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-graceful-fs - drop-in replacement improving the Node.js fs module To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-graceful-fs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-graceful-fs/node-graceful-fs_4.1.10-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-graceful-fs.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-graceful-fs.git It is an update to latest upstream. Thanks, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#843659: marked as done (RFS: node-source-map-support/0.4.6+ds-1)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:53:12 + with message-id <20161108155311.xtm5fc7t32uwp...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843659: RFS: node-source-map-support/0.4.6+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843659, regarding RFS: node-source-map-support/0.4.6+ds-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843659: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843659 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-source-map-support" * Package name: node-source-map-support Version : 0.4.6+ds-1 Upstream Author : Ewan Wallace * URL : https://github.com/evanw/node-source-map-support * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-source-map-support - Fixes stack traces for files with source maps To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-source-map-support Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-source-map-support/node-source-map-support_0.4.6+ds-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-source-map-support.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-source-map-support.git This is just a new upstream release. Thanks, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:42:09PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-source-map-support" . -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#843660: marked as done (RFS: node-ast-types/0.9.1-1)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:56:01 + with message-id <20161108155600.uvmzbpudqhblp...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843660: RFS: node-ast-types/0.9.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843660, regarding RFS: node-ast-types/0.9.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843660: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843660 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-ast-types" * Package name: node-ast-types Version : 0.9.1-1 Upstream Author : Ben Newman * URL : http://github.com/benjamn/ast-types * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-ast-types - Esprima-compatible implementation of the Mozilla JS Parser API To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-ast-types Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-ast-types/node-ast-types_0.9.1-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-ast-types.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-ast-types.git It is mostly a new upstream release (I also bumped dh compat to 10). Thanks, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:47:42PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-ast-types" --- End Message ---
Bug#843661: marked as done (RFS: node-graceful-fs/4.1.10-1)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:59:20 + with message-id <20161108155920.y3iijingn6loo...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843661: RFS: node-graceful-fs/4.1.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843661, regarding RFS: node-graceful-fs/4.1.10-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843661: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843661 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-graceful-fs" * Package name: node-graceful-fs Version : 4.1.10-1 Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter, Ben Noordhuis and contributors * URL : https://github.com/isaacs/node-graceful-fs * License : ISC Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-graceful-fs - drop-in replacement improving the Node.js fs module To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-graceful-fs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-graceful-fs/node-graceful-fs_4.1.10-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-graceful-fs.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-graceful-fs.git It is an update to latest upstream. Thanks, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:52:47PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-graceful-fs" --- End Message ---
Bug#843664: RFS: node-recast/0.11.16-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Control: blocks -1 843660 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-recast" * Package name: node-recast Version : 0.11.16-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Newman * URL : https://github.com/benjamn/recast * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-recast - Pretty printer and syntax tree transformer for JavaScript To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-recast Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-recast/node-recast_0.11.16-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-recast.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-recast.git This is just for a new upstream. I still added a block -1 above because it also depends on a newer version of node-ast-types (another RFS). Thanks, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#843657: marked as done (RFS: node-typescript/2.0.8-1)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:05:43 + with message-id <20161108160543.6fi2hvn4yvoay...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843657: RFS: node-typescript/2.0.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843657, regarding RFS: node-typescript/2.0.8-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843657: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843657 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-typescript" * Package name: node-typescript Version : 2.0.8-1 Upstream Author : Microsoft Corp. * URL : http://typescriptlang.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-typescript - TypeScript is a language for application scale JavaScript develop To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-typescript Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-typescript/node-typescript_2.0.8-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-typescript.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-typescript.git It's just an update to the latest _stable_ upstream (yes, uscan says 2.1.1 is more recent -- but 2.0.8 is the one to package!). Thanks, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:39:07PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-typescript" --- End Message ---
Bug#843664: marked as done (RFS: node-recast/0.11.16-1)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:09:07 + with message-id <20161108160906.36tn3l6d63dsy...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843664: RFS: node-recast/0.11.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843664, regarding RFS: node-recast/0.11.16-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843664: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843664 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Control: blocks -1 843660 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-recast" * Package name: node-recast Version : 0.11.16-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Newman * URL : https://github.com/benjamn/recast * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-recast - Pretty printer and syntax tree transformer for JavaScript To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-recast Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-recast/node-recast_0.11.16-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-recast.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-recast.git This is just for a new upstream. I still added a block -1 above because it also depends on a newer version of node-ast-types (another RFS). Thanks, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:03:15PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-recast" --- End Message ---
Bug#843666: RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-fs-extra" * Package name: node-fs-extra Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : JP Richardson * URL : https://github.com/jprichardson/node-fs-extra * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-fs-extra - fs-extra contains methods not included in the Node.js fs module To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-fs-extra Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-fs-extra/node-fs-extra_1.0.0-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-fs-extra.git Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-fs-extra.git Thanks, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#843666: marked as done (RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:46:10 + with message-id <20161108164610.zk5eovshftp2c...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843666: RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843666, regarding RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843666: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843666 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-fs-extra" * Package name: node-fs-extra Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : JP Richardson * URL : https://github.com/jprichardson/node-fs-extra * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-fs-extra - fs-extra contains methods not included in the Node.js fs module To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-fs-extra Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-fs-extra/node-fs-extra_1.0.0-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-fs-extra.git Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-fs-extra.git Thanks, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:16:49PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-fs-extra" o/ Note that you already filed one before: https://bugs.debian.org/843355 but this one prodded me, so :P (I've merged them) > Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-fs-extra.git I've deleted the debian/0.16.5-1 tag, as that one never reached the archive; could you please take care of deleting it on your local copy too, so you don't push it again accidentally? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#843355: marked as done (RFS: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:46:10 + with message-id <20161108164610.zk5eovshftp2c...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843666: RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843666, regarding RFS: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843666: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843666 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-fs-extra" * Package name: node-fs-extra Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : JP Richardson * URL : https://github.com/jprichardson/node-fs-extra * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-fs-extra - fs-extra contains methods not included in the Node.js fs module To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-fs-extra Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-fs-extra/node-fs-extra_1.0.0-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers team repository: Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-fs-extra.git Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-fs-extra.git Thanks, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:16:49PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-fs-extra" o/ Note that you already filed one before: https://bugs.debian.org/843355 but this one prodded me, so :P (I've merged them) > Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-fs-extra.git I've deleted the debian/0.16.5-1 tag, as that one never reached the archive; could you please take care of deleting it on your local copy too, so you don't push it again accidentally? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#843669: RFS: eclib/20160720-3
control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:40:45PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclib" o/ > Vcs-Git: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/eclib.git * please kill the dh-autoreconf build-dep * d/copyright looks outdated; at least your own copyright is, but please look over all of it. + maybe stop mixing tabs and spaces so irregularly too? * d/rules: + could you instead inject the -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE by using dpkg-buildflags' means? (i.e. DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND variable) autotools should be able to deal with it correctly even without passing it at configure time like that. + can't that thing be moved over to dh_auto_install instead of manually calling make? > - I cleaned d/rules with a rusty axe. :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#843669: RFS: eclib/20160720-3
Hi, On 08/11/2016 17:55, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:40:45PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclib" o/ Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/eclib.git * please kill the dh-autoreconf build-dep Done. * d/copyright looks outdated; at least your own copyright is, but please look over all of it. + maybe stop mixing tabs and spaces so irregularly too? * d/rules: I tried to rework it. + could you instead inject the -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE by using dpkg-buildflags' means? (i.e. DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND variable) autotools should be able to deal with it correctly even without passing it at configure time like that. Well... now you mention it : (1) it wasn't autotools-based when I made the package, so that might explain why everything was passed to the "configure" script ; (2) it's one of the first packages I made, so I might have had no real clue what I was doing ; (3) pbuilder says it compiles as well without it! ==> Conclusion: axed! + can't that thing be moved over to dh_auto_install instead of manually calling make? Well, since the move to autotools, I don't think that is necessary : axed! And pbuilder is still happy. - I cleaned d/rules with a rusty axe. :) I thought I might have cut a bit too much... now I don't think there's much to remove. Still, if you think there's still some left, I'll gladly give another swing. *g* Thanks, Snark on #debian-science
Bug#843669: RFS: eclib/20160720-3
Hi, On 08/11/2016 18:30, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 06:22:34PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: * d/copyright looks outdated; at least your own copyright is, but please look over all of it. + maybe stop mixing tabs and spaces so irregularly too? I tried to rework it. well, it surely has a better look now ;) Good! * d/rules: + could you instead inject the -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE by using dpkg-buildflags' means? (i.e. DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND variable) autotools should be able to deal with it correctly even without passing it at configure time like that. Well... now you mention it : (1) it wasn't autotools-based when I made the package, so that might explain why everything was passed to the "configure" script ; (2) it's one of the first packages I made, so I might have had no real clue what I was doing ; (3) pbuilder says it compiles as well without it! ==> Conclusion: axed! _LARGEFILE_SOURCE is one of those definition that enables LFS support; one way to check whether you killed LFS support by it too is to build on i386 and run lintian with info tags enabled; there is this tag: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/binary-file-built-without-LFS-support.html Well, the upload to experimental is to check nothing is broken by my new patch, but that will also uncover if that change was bad, won't it? anyway, --enable-shared --disable-static should be free to go too while you're on it (I'm not sure off-hand about --disable-static, tbh) I don't want to ship the static lib, so it's good to have the disabling flag, but indeed the enabling one can go : committed (and pushed, for a change!). + can't that thing be moved over to dh_auto_install instead of manually calling make? Well, since the move to autotools, I don't think that is necessary : axed! And pbuilder is still happy. by that you also removed the thing that was deleting the *.la, btw. As far as I remember, upstream's hand-made configure+Makefile.in called ldconfig by hand, and installed everything -- that's why I had to remove things by hand afterwards. The move to autotools produces a better 'install' target : the *.la files don't get shipped needlessly (something dpkg-deb -c confirms). Years-old cruft... Snark on #debian-science
Bug#843669: marked as done (RFS: eclib/20160720-3)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 18:34:56 + with message-id <20161108183455.shbk3jqs5gpvf...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843669: RFS: eclib/20160720-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #843669, regarding RFS: eclib/20160720-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 843669: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843669 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclib" * Package name: eclib Version : 20160720-3 Upstream Author : John Cremona * URL : https://github.com/JohnCremona/eclib/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : math It builds those binary packages: eclib-tools - Programs for modular symbols and elliptic curves over Q libec-dev - Library for modular symbols and elliptic curves over Q (developme libec2 - Library for modular symbols and elliptic curves over Q To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/eclib Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eclib/eclib_20160720-3.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Science Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/eclib.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/eclib.git It's an upload targeted to experimental for two reasons : - I made a better patch for upstream (fixing build issues on ARMEL) -- but I want to be sure it doesn't break other arches, so it should go through the build bots ; - I cleaned d/rules with a rusty axe. Thanks, Snark on #debian-science --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 06:51:19PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > > _LARGEFILE_SOURCE is one of those definition that enables LFS support; > > one way to check whether you killed LFS support by it too is to build on > > i386 and run lintian with info tags enabled; there is this tag: > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/binary-file-built-without-LFS-support.html > > Well, the upload to experimental is to check nothing is broken by my new > patch, but that will also uncover if that change was bad, won't it? indeed > Years-old cruft... :) uploaded! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#843126: Bug#843120: ITP: freight -- easy-to-understand shell script to handle APT repositories
Hi Steve, I think we accidentally replied to the ITP, instead of the RFS. Also, did you have time to check the updated version of the package? Best, nicoo On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 02:54:39PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the catch and for reviewwing the package. > > I uploaded to the same location a fixed version, > and took the opportunity to add Homepage and Vcs-* links. > > > Best, > > Nicolas > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 08:58:04AM +, Steve Kemp wrote: > > On Fri Nov 04, 2016 at 02:10:56 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > > > > Description : easy-to-understand shell script to handle APT > > > repositories > > > freight is an easy-to-use and to understand shell script for > > > building packages and keeping them in an up-to-date and signed > > > reporitory. > > > > Minor issue - but that should be "repository". > > > > Steve > > -- > > https://steve.fi/ > >
Bug#842429: RFS: mlocate/0.26-1.1 [NMU]
On 11/08/2016 09:11 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:50:51PM -0700, Dan Mick wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mlocate" > > o/ Thanks, Mattia. > (though that template ought to be more clever and don't claim "my > package" for a NMU :P) I wondered about that, but the instructions were pretty explicit. Mongo only pawn in game of life. >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mlocate/mlocate_0.26-1.1.dsc > >> mlocate (0.26-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium >> >> * Non-maintainer upload. >> * Add cephfs to PRUNEFS and /var/lib/ceph to PRUNEPATHS >> Closes: #786433 > > Now, that .dsc has a lot of noise: > it creates stuff in .pc and debian/patches, which is completely > irrelevant for this package that is not debian source format > '3.0 (quilt)' (it's not specified, hence 1.0), and it's not using any > patch system > > Am I right that the only relevant change is this? > > diff -u mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf > --- mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf > +++ mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf > @@ -3,2 +3,2 @@ > -PRUNEPATHS="/tmp /var/spool /media" > -PRUNEFS="NFS nfs nfs4 rpc_pipefs afs binfmt_misc proc smbfs autofs iso9660 > ncpfs coda devpts ftpfs devfs mfs shfs sysfs cifs lustre tmpfs usbfs udf > fuse.glusterfs fuse.sshfs curlftpfs" > +PRUNEPATHS="/tmp /var/spool /media /var/lib/ceph" > +PRUNEFS="NFS nfs nfs4 rpc_pipefs afs binfmt_misc proc smbfs autofs iso9660 > ncpfs coda devpts ftpfs devfs mfs shfs sysfs cifs lustre tmpfs usbfs udf > fuse.glusterfs fuse.sshfs curlftpfs ceph fuse.ceph" > > > If so, please clean up d/patches and .pc, and rebuild. Run debdiff on > the previous version of the package to make sure the thing is clean. Yep, that's the only relevant change, and I would have sworn it was quilt. I'll redo. > I'd also ask you to close the ubuntu bug too (just add 'LP: #1281074' in > the changelog), that way when the package will be synced/merged it'll be > automatically closed (actually, not sure for the "merged" part, but > anyway…). Super. Thanks again. > Then.. I'd like to rewrite the whole packaging part of that package, but > this is a NMU and changes should be minimal >
Bug#843684: RFS: hexer/1.0.3-1 -- new upstream version, refresh the packaging
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hexer": * Package name: hexer Version : 1.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev * URL : https://devel.ringlet.net/editors/hexer/ * License : BSD-3-clause Section : utils It builds a single binary packages that has been tested with Lintian and sbuild: hexer - interactive binary editor with a Vi-like interface To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/hexer Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_1.0.3-1.dsc ...or from its new, full-source Git repository (not the same as the one referred to by the hexer package in unstable, so debcheckout won't work): git clone https://gitlab.com/hexer/hexer.git cd hexer git checkout pristine-tar git checkout debian pristine-tar checkout ../hexer_1.0.3.orig.tar.xz More information about hexer can be obtained from its website, https://devel.ringlet.net/editors/hexer/ Changes since the last upload: hexer (1.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Point the Vcs-* fields to my full-source GitLab repository. * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 3.9.8 with no changes; the menu file remains, since hexer has no icon for a desktop file. * Use the HTTPS scheme for various upstream and Debian-related URLs. * Bump the year on my debian/* copyright notice. * Update the watch file a bit: - convert it to format version 4 - switch back to pgpsigurlmangle; pgpmode=auto will silently fail on missing signature files, and pgpmode=next/previous is a bit too verbose - reflect the new layout of the upstream site - use the *.tar.xz upstream tarball * New upstream release: - config.h is autogenerated now, so no configure override - strerror(3) should be present on all Debian systems, so no -DBSD - update the upstream copyright years * Drop a duplicate -std=c99 from the C compiler flags. * Handle release candidate versions in the watch file. * Drop the handling of the non-standard "werror" build option from the rules file. * Bump the debhelper compatibility level to 10 and drop the --parallel option since it is the default now. -- Peter Pentchev Tue, 08 Nov 2016 18:32:40 +0200 Thanks in advance for your time! G'luck, Peter -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
