Luidspreker herstelling
[ Is deze mail niet goed leesbaar? Klik hier voor de webversie. ](http://p.n2g19.com/l/212613301/c/0-ipbs-obju4j-12jp) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) == SERVICECENTER = == == [LUIDSPREKER HERSTELLING.COM===](http://loudspeakerrepair.com) VOOR EEN VLOTTE AFHANDELING VAN UW LUIDSPREKER HERSTELLINGEN [WWW.LOUDSPEAKERREPAIR.COM=](http://loudspeakerrepair.com) [Herstelling van alle oudere speakers](http://loudspeakerrepair.com) Vervanging rolranden [Herwikkelen spreekspoel===](http://loudspeakerrepair.com) [Herstelling luidsprekerdoek===](http://loudspeakerrepair.com) [Herstelling scheidingsfilter](http://loudspeakerrepair.com) [Op onze site http://loudspeakerrepair.com krijgt u een impressie van ons bedrijf en werkwijze](http://loudspeakerrepair.com) Voor alle info 0476 945 785 == 00 32 (0) 50 / 71 69 01 = don...@telenet.be === DONNET 9990 Maldegem (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com) donnet Kruisken 16 9991 Adegem België [ Nieuwsbrief opzeggen ](http://www.newsletter-abmeldung.n2g19.com/l/212613300/c/0-ipbs-obju4j-12jp)
Bug#819394: marked as done (RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 08:08:29 + (UTC) with message-id <1193332644.1357295.1463990909802.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#819394: RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #819394, regarding RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 819394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stormlib" * Package name: stormlib Version : 9.20-1 Upstream Author : Ladislav Zezula * URL : http://www.zezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html * License : MIT Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libstorm-dev - Library for accessing the MPQ archives (development files) libstorm9 - Library for accessing the MPQ archives To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/stormlib Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stormlib/stormlib_9.20-1.dsc More information about stormlib can be obtained from http://www.zezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #819380) Regards, Pali Rohár signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- done! g. Il Lunedì 23 Maggio 2016 9:37, Pali Rohár ha scritto: On Thursday 19 May 2016 18:48:58 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 27 April 2016 13:01:20 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi, the packaging seems good now, I would like to ask you a final question: > > > > how do you feel about using the same license for debian packaging and > > upstream? > > (asking about changing GPL-3+ to MIT). > > Ok, I changed debian files to MIT (same as upstream). > > > Forwarding patches otherwise would be impossible without a relicense. > > > > and the copyright still needs to be updated: > > > > >So in this case, how to update copyright? Just for src/lzma? Or for all > > >other embedded libraries even when they are not used and needed? > > > > > > you have to list *every* copyright and license on copyright file, regardless > > of it being used or not. > > This is a showstopper for ftpmasters. > > Done, now all embedded libraries have entry in copyright file. > > Package is now updated on mentors server. Something more is needed? Gianfranco: PING -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com--- End Message ---
Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]
Hi Lumin, Ghislain >An update to this, according to >https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/autopkgtest/README.package-tests.html >Even if I want to add some testsuite for python-caffe, I don't need >to add those runtime deps in control, I can add them in tests/control >instead, by adding "Depends" field that supprted by d/tests/control. true, I agree >OpenCV 3.0 can yield python3-opencv package with just a small patch,>which is >provided by a user in an opencv debian bug. >Protobuf might be similar. that would be awesome >And I agree, on behalf of the release team I should make python3-* >packages in the initial upload. I decide to bump python from >2 to 3. python3-caffe can be built easily with packages outside >of Debian archive. One of the unapplied patches I removed >is for python3->python2 downgrade reversal. >opencv and protobuf is still on the way of 2 to 3, in Debian. yes, so lets go for python2 (or maybe lets go for no python bindings?) >CPU version is safe. and >no need to worry about GCC and CUDA, the source of trouble >is the compatibility between NVCC and GCC. >That's exactly why I'm now a maintainer of CUDA >I helped the 6.5->7.0 and 7.0->7.5 bump of CUDA, and the NVCC >usability got into a better situation, where caffe-cuda >survived. wonderful! >CUDA 8.0 is comming soon, if NVCC 8.x fails to work with GCC-6, >we just lock build-dep at GCC-5. Safe too. wonderful >Actually I guess CUDA 8.5 release date is prior to stretch freeze. even better >I'm not familiar with that package, and I think if I'm going >to help caffe's recursive dependency package maintainers, >I intend to first have a look at opencv or protobuf. I can do scikit-image >Stretch freeze is Q1 2017, I'm afraid whether caffe can >be uploaded into stretch in time. > >* python3-opencv upload >* python3-protobuf upload I'll wait for some news from you. >* python3-skimage NON-DFSG bugs I'll do it. Ghislain, do you think we can upload it right now? even if it doesn't migrate to testing, at least we will have the new queue trip cleared, and then we can fix bugs on reverse-dependencies. G.
Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package
Hi Stefan, On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:48:37PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi sorry for the late answer, it took a while to have time to dig into the > issue. Did anything happen here in the past 2,5 months? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#808231: marked as done (RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 08:55:35 + with message-id <20160523085532.ga4...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#808231: RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #808231, regarding RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 808231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808231 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mkcast" * Package name: mkcast Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : a...@keyboardfire.com * URL : https://github.com/KeyboardFire/mkcast * License : The MIT License Section : Python It builds those binary packages: mkcast - A tool for creating GIF screencasts of a window, with key presses To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mkcast Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mkcast/mkcast_1.0.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: mkcast (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #808227) -- Abhilash Mhaisne <55abhil...@openmailbox.org> Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:46:46 +0530 Regards, Abhilash Mhaisne --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 06:32:25PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > please remove the moreinfo tag from this RFS once addressed. > Also there are comments on mentors.d.n. No voices from the sponsoree since Dec 2015, and the package is not on mentors anymore. Therefore, I'm closing this ticket, please open a new one if you are still interested once you addressed all the concerns rised. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#808782: RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4)
Hi Jerome, On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:52:39AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Meanwhile OpenViewerFX moved to GitHub and thing get clearer for me: > I am not sure that this pacakge is indeed still needed. > For now I will focus on the OpenViewerFX package. > The probability is high that I abandon this package: > I will let you know and I will clean the place if it happens. ~2,5 months passed, did anything change in this regard? If the package is not needed, please close this RFS. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:45:16AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Firstly I apologies for my very late reply. > Secondly, thanks you for your sponsorship. Is anything happening here? ~2,5 months passed since the last email. @Markus: if you are committing to reviwing and eventually sponsor a RFS, please set yourself as owner of the bug. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote: > > Obvious way to improve packaging would be to address Lintian warnings, > > introduce support for Systemd etc. Sorry I don't have time for in-depth > > review and at the moment I have no intention to sponsor MooseFS... Did anything happened here in the past 4+ months? Dmitry setted the moreinfo tag (as this indeed need(ed) work), but I anyway can't understand if he is an available sponsor for this. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#811455: RFS: qhttpengine/0.1.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
Hi Nathan! On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:51:22PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo Did anything happened here in the past 1,5 months? Are you still interested in getting this into Debian? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#812216: marked as done (RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.0.6+ds1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 09:14:23 + with message-id <20160523091420.ga5...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#812216: RFS suspended until further notice has caused the Debian Bug report #812216, regarding RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.0.6+ds1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 812216: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812216 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libopenshot-audio" * Package name: libopenshot-audio Version : 0.0.6+ds1-1 Upstream Author : OpenShot Studios, LLC * URL : http://www.openshot.org/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libopenshot-audio-dev - development files for the OpenShot audio library libopenshot-audio-doc - documentation for the OpenShot audio library libopenshot-audio3 - library for high-quality audio editing To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libopenshot-audio Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libo/libopenshot-audio/libopenshot-audio_0.0.6+ds1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. Closes: #810787 Additional information: - This package is a build dependency for the OpenShot video editor. - This library is essentially a stripped version of the JUCE library plus a platform-agnostic CMake build system on top. - The source were stripped from the vendored copies of flac, oggvorbis, libjpeg, libpng and zlib and the packaging adapted to use the system libraries instead. Best Regards, Ghislain Vaillant --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 08:39:26PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: reopen -1 > > reopening Well, no. The package is not available not even to be reviewed, let's not pollute uselessly the RFS list with non-actinable bugs that contains nothing useful. Ghislain: please reopen this (or another bug) if you still wants this package in. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#813603: RFS: libcxl/1.3-1 [ITP] -- libcxl -- Coherent accelerator shared library
Hi Frederic, On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:53:18PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, the package is already in Ubuntu, did you try to look at the packaging > and see if it was similar? This was the last recentish email, but anyway there have been 3 replies to your RFS request since Feb, but no replies from you. Are you still interested in this package? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#814859: RFS: runescape/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Set in a fantasy world of war, landscapes and sinister powers
Hi Carlos! On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:30:51PM +, James Cowgill wrote: > I have a few comments on this pavkage. This was Feb 16, more than 3 months ago, but with no replies from you. Are you still interested in this package? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#816396: RFS: vizigrep/1.3-1 ITP
Hi Jason! On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:09:47PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > hi, lets review: Did anything happen in the past 1,5 months? Are you still interested in this package? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#808782: marked as done (RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4))
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 10:37:53 +0100 with message-id <5742cf71.3010...@rezozer.net> and subject line RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4) has caused the Debian Bug report #808782, regarding RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 808782: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808782 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor for the packages jpedal4-lgpl, a wide used Java library that allows one to manipulate PDF material. The concerned version of jpedal is actually frozen, but it is still wildly used because of its license. Thanks, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Folks: It appears the jpedal-lgpl source is getting out of age. I am considering to cancel the ITP. Meanwhile, I thank Markus Koschany for his reviewing of the package. Sorry for the noise, Jerome - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXQs9xAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLBcUf/Av9ZyP2/Dsf3ttVP1vMkCzP qxVmHG03mFYQkxNbuVtVWNGpyPX4QLlzYeZJq3ifqcsKJv02KHn2tpYku2YXignY a6iHZA8EWrkNLL+y0o+FOwUnaQhP5kWK3X3W1I6xPqR5/gRKq9OAwQvV159+wYew DYF2yvHJXSSAzTikJktx96wZOaYlhfVQBOp+/n4lzcXwxv7sY80l6ith6XGtvSUI 6BS7WhiT9ol5W100WXo/QAd0GQkVdPOxElDU7QG6eKwDAv+m/wIcLJU8ArsQ5tnq FXAjKi416Ii1TCV7k/f02X49okTPnfS7QBbqrfjCDdFLSoK3yk5wwQqiH0BurE0t E9vh+vomiPNUy4+/8syMx3L4ss8Dz2iCHVbmqLXR36lFbKh0kjOc39DAYqOtfAcA LapoPLq7VrrqMGP9y22ecbsDkGBPkjTWvKf4v6PD5qfCjus8t8hMK4IN/t3ZCNLO QYWqsYibPqEhHscp4GUl2BK/Lu+KB/R05YqzsZGKg10zOUjbavFN7hCBl7ZPOGp8 VF2lLoMbT+AVHymd3wzpSpbIwulU5Ahp8fMMYkMlEgRWDeJ1UlmKr07KPXJa8zpx szSReapKs7W9c59c5Jc5Ut9hHnSczeEMuON9MmgiVC1lysU/k5cGgwh8Q372AjJA MmJ2ncKhRcSeiqszCvSCp7W+jT8LbkwR/bwKCMm6HbZEvdyxdD5t5Jvo+EqxESQX Vcfkd6caIQMQLEQZAhkqrHVng/4cAjxMA2ieDgA/ALBhJUBihLVUuAHOb9svy7G9 u5LOeHtUontilmVCM1V5MyUPsp9qEvuJJ5RidnGwAPBH8U8G+w6GFLK+T/siOz2A hfHeyjSEJ1fNaVGsaPkmjBmRpzt5CWJUVn22Yw+XH3IKBP82jwuZZy3HHWFALi+z 5L/r4i3iPH9p2Sb3OI+q/RcX7VR1sGa7nZcXUpmVx+V5cOhp8us/2abJj6tqX+L7 NuH1r9jcSkii75IobYV+b9ku8HGdfjZ6cgvbCdogvmQW3CSHSm43fzd0iwKor61c /ullI5h1zu71jC9ol+Hig8QYkNDMTG51cLpyTjaler3pNACTD7aNqvrmlxa+LIB2 cVrjz0xjYzCU+mZe54EioAjVIfajbpz8mlOhtJHzPliQr2QcbVSJbFnb8NnFXPqi 1WWRqOAO4xmmzOvE/zYwzR6xEuHGIR0QVCNvJymTJtoc7ZDKb0bGt26kMlOhJxcU zKZwl8NVRBssJ0GyE73uxM9z+PzBRxcx/Tsb+/peuxGyRae+2hByz47SVBa11XWC 8WIlKjbTjjw+SxqMMOYQfNz1hNN9pqJWlbXf4BbZVLNYYAME86rLy/Mp/7w5cuU= =UEvG -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Folks, it appeared that the upstrem team does not show very cooperative, so I am postponing the maintenance the Debian package openviewerfx. Meanwhile, I thanks Markus Koschany for reviewing the package. Sorry for the noise, Jerome - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXQtLOAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLbCQgAJhHosL973vKW//6yS68V38Q 4uFu7KhA44iayc3Pzfmkn3wDQ2fHzHdp+j1wuNmPraz5FA3AVW9sji/aXxfxXhvj 1FYiuznvVQUeZWnMqRPi4v/94P/la+Y73fvtIwD8szWARk8aMdk4sNSafhyI4uyM bvYQDVmEo0L5/mnjyaU/X4GFFH6coerI/AkJcXGXMCOlvlYtUQlXbznXXHiVEH2q 2fWs/gZCXjYubZUjgwm0KmD7OI173TECOWdEfZPHUADcEzT+MIRcmz8WnaRcWhG0 8i2EP6xagdRuK5plui1GgblX6IbyKfW+O9TTGlkkCmJg083N5anq2WQg66K30NwO XzrkfavEts9H+GZ2ReSHHqfT5cVTMjkb5Wi9Zli6Bg+URwyKRYK8te6pGqqL0pXk v71LKFQfLzBa4hkQlnnnQ6pafDJkcsFCRuQeMFtmGLLlqytqeNQhexTCKuA6yCRG 45JBDIojFWwPSLpJABK6xlR+gih9HrWDFdgUjjb3mtCLj07NK3CNLOzUUB+/Zecj Q0ErW0hyYKo7yecI17ileQqR4n9KbRZRj93GVuT8PPMW0BeVYPC7775+Os+zd+YV iSRcaNgBdluH3Tj2As4oHoxls2coCQhgTNTdZGxOA4r937E3h4NByqr9Bi1w7782 HV1qrrUIqrj2WOVGVPynGadAKILpADj4qedx0EL0ThYDKDCUSVZxk4XGfrd9ke9d g5ho7Qvc2ArbN/Fi4yyuM5S3MeVFyt6JWrdUCtUBMomUJk7FT5lhfkpNYjfux9oc DKnEmk6SuSgtuWV+dpkUnXNPgQDR1+ZqN2vFTa3Yf6MbwFW8nZvexYWFYlY7sKRd y9JHifaarpIiniVyEfs1wgGkggrQpHc/wgVsWO7yxjQN54SsSGxNkBj3mTkwolLr 0Gn92X3WNTU71E1x2o+VKlG1JraYsBIkMhENhY94kk0/+Wvz2xX/p0+WFl9AwVjZ sZbjrDgMsOXQwb6sc3Ntqo2/z5rwzagfBb0gFc/3l+HjYwimK0uVBhmZAVv5CwUi liDMd81dByZ7FQ30Jciupqk4Khd1Q0xgzEOw/Ugx9FCvlRGV1vPDRg1kTmQgUtwT tdPKThIF/PbeS+f0RmZkH+g7m8eoxeaM+jpH1KfwdtlV53dUh2Wv9FnUGhYGxzSg K55LqFtWJZnc6zOx82m/Bo/PaJsZ0Q+GmQXEv9biKfIu4u8NMW9gYKGNMlwzWHUo ZZQ2NhI0w8qix6XerB/kRHGifEtFP2FyK4GQ3e6gKOgaIA6jelAgE+0NEGtAcylb /eF6hBv/8Xtv9MUJpOdNNMlHzEthTXjMwgQrdEoeUHW5dWBCNWKB4bTgzmBA8XM= =HAya -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system
On Monday, 23 May 2016 9:08:20 AM AEST Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Did anything happened here in the past 4+ months? Not much from packaging prospective. Upstream however show some signs of improvement as they've started using GitHub: https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs > Dmitry setted the moreinfo tag (as this indeed need(ed) work), but I > anyway can't understand if he is an available sponsor for this. I'm still busy so I can't make any promises regarding sponsorship. However I am probably the best person to review packaging... As far as I'm aware they've never attempted to improve packaging so I doubt they can maintain it properly... Last time I checked upstream packaging was too sloppy for upload. I still have some concerns regarding inferior licensing [1] and I believe that MooseFS is redundant when we already have LizardFS. I'm not against having alternative storage system which may have benefits like availability of different MySQL/MariaDB flavours... [1]: https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs/issues/5 -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations. -- George Orwell signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#808783: marked as done (RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer)
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 11:16:36 +0100 with message-id <5742d884.1010...@rezozer.net> and subject line RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer has caused the Debian Bug report #808783, regarding RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 808783: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808783 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor for the package openviewerfx [1], a Java library to manipulate PDF material (which is the successor of the jpedal java library). Thanks, Jerome [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/openviewerfx.git -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Folks, it appeared that the upstrem team does not show very cooperative, so I am postponing the maintenance the Debian package openviewerfx. Meanwhile, I thanks Markus Koschany for reviewing the package. Sorry for the noise, Jerome - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXQtiEAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLX7of/0EY8gcK5x85FOb13VSH6oKy ke3Ysks3LmRb3LsZjf5paVSe+xAOVb8J3E1DjQzB0LLoukYh+bEksPbB6mvcQ16C 4X2qe1lYwhbt/27+++eLqV80YEhJt6wWDd1tnewlZRdRSURCFk3ZnHBAtmrpL/lQ HP9ZmqQOoSUPEFZ81nyo+R03TEgWTUPslmrV/WMMU+4dtJN8ZFgeIaw+MPvBkvF/ Un8Q+p4pJAb/YGSu9kWFpCSc18OhNG4YmD08OKTgnGDgX0eSjkZoPdhACMzeA1Zu aj2osmpbTiWjg0NKtt3gtvEeW4rAfG1jmca6+B7hvfHx7UUew7NHqAVEB0tTJ+PZ 54BPAqwX/7AF22Mf776h1SVpSIyA6cF2bYGCaoyH/mqmspuH1SG+Xc4y/x7XnRym BqebSdIk29qY8O6lsu0E1P6V3vyVrHPajESrudaUHAP7IiTkhPXtAu/nin499Lhe a+Bj6j5Y9itX6AtP0CL/sCjbBFR8z5gKvDeY1dMImnQ5ZFhQkLOZRsINZUpInEEf W588vdZrV1hw6q2ID/Oqe6vR3y9BI9MOv2SlIxs9n2dHUu+IwU1bIcVazdoVlPKg AIev18fVqgzD7r7xBPEUs2rIYcu8AtLjcNz10uE8GgHuBtMwObw+VBdsglj3wduC lUcOlK8DhwWKY58InFO+kqm+Y0hMPdAK1Cck2x/NgIveCnhXkOTxc/Ni5NrUVhg7 IZvBbaOpVJy2WPyviblxwxNLoxpMJudtIlmOp8I6Doqd7hM9oWtjcGQtzuGyfuFX 6rJj11ThqmzaS4QYxv5vK4T/CBrsk8SasfevK7sYtE1sdxJQyhI1UP3h3E1GAgkR a3/pjCPM4cF2WOmIuYCCQMtC8ThU4ucq38/YXooetbO91G5BuN0KJy2hVyR1QT46 nMRJo5RtFCpFab0IifEsm1uD2pG8TlzVoW7A7DOqyivI98h4DqgyHO1ihbusUUAY OMQ2ny0ZoR9G6xzYy63/bXEtLe6CICGZb2aW/6ngbZmLe7H/uICPi8sGuhXTyYhu B6fYJd7IAnIJuupEt0Ir2vdzLuahBpY0IZ8aSNDMID5i3FUXm0tc7ALq6lShcsOc vzHpX6VC3xP/PPSYzerKLz4p92wdkPSXNa6ZWzTNXlhoWwLr+XIgC7ZwUYrj7tQc YP+2aTO8JqVjPMZt66zNnh0YLQUvJXaYSxtr8jAJps+bDEpzhFjAyCQQEKOPNWzF 0c50PtH+w9mw5ZjV7QN+KuSLEGGGvCl7hMfClVYDIVJGY7aA4gJXYtNF3MEAyiKb HQLaxEKWPOF7jM8cT7dlVKEyhIl4z/3nHaG6uM54lMcdtDa3UUSjGFuZUfegPEo= =l+ZI -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack
Hi Gianfranco, your very helpful hints helped me to get some steps forward. However, its not finally done. On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 06:48:36AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >Another question is how I could link against the Debian packaged f2c > >rather than building the one that comes with clapack upstream. > > I would say: remove the add_subdirectory (line 21) > and then: > 1) create a "FindF2C.cmake" file and use it as helper > (that would be the best and upstreamable choice > you can find some examples in "ettercap/cmake/Modules/Find*" > > > 2) just include_directories for helping it to find the .h file (if not in > standard directory) > and target_link_libraries of the .so file. I think the .h files are not a problem. With my recent changes in Git[1] there is a problem with the linker when running the clapack test suite: ... std.dir/dtrt03.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtrt05.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtrt06.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtzt01.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtzt02.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dgennd.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvge.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvgb.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/derrge.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvpo.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/derrpo.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dlaord.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/__/__/INSTALL/dsecnd.c.o -o xlintstd -rdynamic ../MATGEN/libtmglib.a ../../SRC/libclapack.so.3.2.1 ../../BLAS/SRC/libcblas.so.3.2.1 -lm -lf2c -Wl,-rpath,/build/clapack-3.2.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/SRC:/build/clapack-3.2.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/BLAS/SRC CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/alaerh.c.o: In function `alaerh_': /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:444: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:591: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:604: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:843: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:473: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/alaerh.c.o:/build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:737: more undefined references to `i_len_trim' follow CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dchkps.c.o: In function `dchkps_': /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/dchkps.c:252: undefined reference to `i_dceiling' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Any further hint? Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/clapack.git -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack
http://ftp.kevag-telekom.de/mirrors/gentoo.org/rsync/sci-libs/clapack/files/clapack-3.2.1-noblasf2c.patch seems that the i_len_trim.c file might be somewhere else, look at gentoo packaging, they seem to have not stripped it from the tarball I guess. Does this helps? G. Il Lunedì 23 Maggio 2016 12:08, Andreas Tille ha scritto: Hi Gianfranco, your very helpful hints helped me to get some steps forward. However, its not finally done. On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 06:48:36AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >Another question is how I could link against the Debian packaged f2c > >rather than building the one that comes with clapack upstream. > > I would say: remove the add_subdirectory (line 21) > and then: > 1) create a "FindF2C.cmake" file and use it as helper > (that would be the best and upstreamable choice > you can find some examples in "ettercap/cmake/Modules/Find*" > > > 2) just include_directories for helping it to find the .h file (if not in > standard directory) > and target_link_libraries of the .so file. I think the .h files are not a problem. With my recent changes in Git[1] there is a problem with the linker when running the clapack test suite: ... std.dir/dtrt03.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtrt05.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtrt06.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtzt01.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtzt02.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dgennd.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvge.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvgb.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/derrge.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvpo.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/derrpo.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dlaord.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/__/__/INSTALL/dsecnd.c.o -o xlintstd -rdynamic ../MATGEN/libtmglib.a ../../SRC/libclapack.so.3.2.1 ../../BLAS/SRC/libcblas.so.3.2.1 -lm -lf2c -Wl,-rpath,/build/clapack-3.2.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/SRC:/build/clapack-3.2.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/BLAS/SRC CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/alaerh.c.o: In function `alaerh_': /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:444: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:591: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:604: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:843: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:473: undefined reference to `i_len_trim' CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/alaerh.c.o:/build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:737: more undefined references to `i_len_trim' follow CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dchkps.c.o: In function `dchkps_': /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/dchkps.c:252: undefined reference to `i_dceiling' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Any further hint? Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/clapack.git -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#822107: marked as done (RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 10:46:48 + (UTC) with message-id <1353418483.1652467.1464000408369.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#822107: RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #822107, regarding RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 822107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822107 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eja" * Package name: eja Version : 9.3.12-1 Upstream Author : Ubaldo Porcheddu * URL : https://github.com/ubaldus/eja * License : GPL Section : web It builds those binary packages: eja - micro web server for static and dynamic Lua generated content. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/eja Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eja/eja_9.3.12-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/ubaldus/eja. Regards, Ubaldo Porcheddu --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >replaced with https://github.com/ubaldus/eja.git nice >updated to 3.9.8 ok >done >wrapped to 80 columns and I hope improved the description. >removed wonderful! >ok, bug is #824919 wonderful >I hope I added every licence and holder. ok I think so, lets see ftpmasters' review >I promise I will study cmake and try to improve :) thanks! >I hope I did it in the right way, I tried to compile with and without >already installed Lua and it seems to be working fine. wonderful! >I added the -g option but I could not find any way to run the dh_strip, >is this automatic? yes! >I hope I did it in the right way, it seems to be working fine on my >environment. > 15) install something like this? > override_dh_auto_install: > dh_auto_install -- prefix=/usr ok >this file is needed by eja.c to "embed" the Lua files in lib/*.lua and >has to be created on the fly, I mean this is the only way I found out to >be working fine but of course I am open to any better suggestion. ok, but not used in Debian builds, right? >I am not sure if this is the right solution but I added them in >debian/rules. your solution lacks of a build-dependency (please try pbuilder/sbuild to see if the package builds in a clean environment) I honestly prefer a simple "export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all" > hope I have done it right. missing the version string :) (as shown on mentors page) >replaced (was in json.lua). ok (please don't patch embedded libraries, or at least forward patches upstream too) >should be better now. ok >should also be removed after eja.dirs deletion. ok >I tried the same and it complains about helpFull/helpful but indeed >helpFull >is the name of the option meaning "full help". ok >honestly this library is really for /proc access but I found out I could >calculate the total amount of cores from /sys so I added it as first >option when counting them. ok thanks >> https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata' >I could not run these tests, I will try again later but if you already >have >the output maybe it would help me to sort it out. well, this is about adding a file with some content https://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3A%2Fmetadata%24%20Name/page_0 some new stuff to look at (something has been already done by me, please look at the patch, integrate it, and look at the differences between your version and mine something I leave to you: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/eja/9.5.20-1/lintian cheers, G. eja_9.5.20-1.debian.tar.xz Description: application/xz --- End Message ---
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack
Sorry for replying to my own mail. I just noticed that the Debian packaged libf2c really has no symbol i_len_trim. Will check what version is packaged and how this can be fixed. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:08:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, > > your very helpful hints helped me to get some steps forward. However, > its not finally done. > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 06:48:36AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > >Another question is how I could link against the Debian packaged f2c > > >rather than building the one that comes with clapack upstream. > > > > I would say: remove the add_subdirectory (line 21) > > and then: > > 1) create a "FindF2C.cmake" file and use it as helper > > (that would be the best and upstreamable choice > > you can find some examples in "ettercap/cmake/Modules/Find*" > > > > > > 2) just include_directories for helping it to find the .h file (if not in > > standard directory) > > and target_link_libraries of the .so file. > > I think the .h files are not a problem. With my recent changes in Git[1] > there is a problem with the linker when running the clapack test suite: > > ... > std.dir/dtrt03.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtrt05.c.o > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtrt06.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtzt01.c.o > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dtzt02.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dgennd.c.o > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvge.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvgb.c.o > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/derrge.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/ddrvpo.c.o > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/derrpo.c.o CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dlaord.c.o > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/__/__/INSTALL/dsecnd.c.o -o xlintstd -rdynamic > ../MATGEN/libtmglib.a ../../SRC/libclapack.so.3.2.1 > ../../BLAS/SRC/libcblas.so.3.2.1 -lm -lf2c > -Wl,-rpath,/build/clapack-3.2.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/SRC:/build/clapack-3.2.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/BLAS/SRC > > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/alaerh.c.o: In function `alaerh_': > /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:444: undefined reference to > `i_len_trim' > /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:591: undefined reference to > `i_len_trim' > /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:604: undefined reference to > `i_len_trim' > /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:843: undefined reference to > `i_len_trim' > /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:473: undefined reference to > `i_len_trim' > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/alaerh.c.o:/build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/alaerh.c:737: > more undefined references to `i_len_trim' follow > CMakeFiles/xlintstd.dir/dchkps.c.o: In function `dchkps_': > /build/clapack-3.2.1/TESTING/LIN/dchkps.c:252: undefined reference to > `i_dceiling' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > Any further hint? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/clapack.git > > -- > http://fam-tille.de -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review
hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from scratch using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established repo. i could easily solve this by nuking the repo and starting over, but this is frowned upon. so do i start out be reverting all the commits after the original `gbp import-orig blah.orig.tar.gz`, and then do all the DPMT stuff after that? any advice here would be appreciated. with thanks jonathon
Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review
Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: > > Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging > > there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from scratch > using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established repo. i > could easily solve this by nuking the repo and starting over, but this is > frowned upon. Mind sharing with Jonathon how you successfully solved it? :) > so do i start out be reverting all the commits after the original `gbp > import-orig blah.orig.tar.gz`, and then do all the DPMT stuff after that? that would be kind of ugly... > any advice here would be appreciated. It's possible, not well documented maybe, but with some trials and thoughts it can be done. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#813603: RFS: libcxl/1.3-1 [ITP] -- libcxl -- Coherent accelerator shared library
Hi Mattia and Gianfranco, yes I haven't answered recently because I've been working with upstream to tune the installation part and deal with the interface version that was not correctly handled. The patch is pushed upstream and I've asked for a new tarball release this morning which should come soon as they also want to put some other improvements inside as well. The packaging in Ubuntu is mine ; Ubuntu guys were kind enough to accept it though the 2 previous points needed to be improved : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1541457/comments/10 Sorry for not updating ; I should come with something much better :) As usual, thanks for advising, F. In-Reply-To: <20160523091952.ga6...@chase.mapreri.org> On Mon, 23 May 2016 09:19:55 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Hi Frederic, > > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:53:18PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi, the package is already in Ubuntu, did you try to look at the packaging > > and see if it was similar? > > This was the last recentish email, but anyway there have been 3 replies > to your RFS request since Feb, but no replies from you. > > Are you still interested in this package? > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Bug#820488: RFS: roadfighter/1.0.1269-1 [ITP] -- Drive a car in a death race
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:07:39AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> I'm worried about fonts/*.ttf. If these fonts are packaged in Debian they
> shouldn't be shipped in the binary package. Otherwise, there is no info
> that they are free, no license, no canonical name etc. In any case
> shipping some random fonts in the source package is troublesome.
If you open them in fontforge, their true names are DroidSerif-Bold and
DroidSerif-Italic. Those are gone from Debian, but according to Wikipedia
they're subsumed into NotoSerif. Ie, package fonts-noto-hinted files
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/noto/NotoSerif-{Bold,Italic}.ttf
--
An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy.
Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review
Hi, On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from scratch using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established repo. i could easily solve this by nuking the repo and starting over, but this is frowned upon. Mind sharing with Jonathon how you successfully solved it? :) so do i start out be reverting all the commits after the original `gbp import-orig blah.orig.tar.gz`, and then do all the DPMT stuff after that? that would be kind of ugly... any advice here would be appreciated. It's possible, not well documented maybe, but with some trials and thoughts it can be done. From memory, I used : git-dpm record-new-upstream --allow-changes-in-debian-branch --new-tarball-only That is ugly but tames the beast... Snark on #debian-python
Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review
hi julien, On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from scratch using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established repo. i could easily solve this by nuking the repo and starting over, but this is frowned upon. Mind sharing with Jonathon how you successfully solved it? :) so do i start out be reverting all the commits after the original `gbp import-orig blah.orig.tar.gz`, and then do all the DPMT stuff after that? that would be kind of ugly... any advice here would be appreciated. It's possible, not well documented maybe, but with some trials and thoughts it can be done. From memory, I used : git-dpm record-new-upstream --allow-changes-in-debian-branch --new-tarball-only if i run that, i get git-dpm: ERROR: Missing file debian/.git-dpm do i need to do a `git-dpm init` first? i.e. git-dpm init ../python-nanomsg_1.0.orig.tar.gz but then i've already told it where the tarball is. any other pointers? thanks for your help jonathon
Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review
On 23/05/2016 23:52, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 15:39, Jonathon Love wrote: hi julien, On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from scratch using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established repo. i could easily solve this by nuking the repo and starting over, but this is frowned upon. Mind sharing with Jonathon how you successfully solved it? :) so do i start out be reverting all the commits after the original `gbp import-orig blah.orig.tar.gz`, and then do all the DPMT stuff after that? that would be kind of ugly... any advice here would be appreciated. It's possible, not well documented maybe, but with some trials and thoughts it can be done. From memory, I used : git-dpm record-new-upstream --allow-changes-in-debian-branch --new-tarball-only if i run that, i get git-dpm: ERROR: Missing file debian/.git-dpm do i need to do a `git-dpm init` first? i.e. git-dpm init ../python-nanomsg_1.0.orig.tar.gz but then i've already told it where the tarball is. any other pointers? thanks for your help jonathon Put: debianTag="debian/%e%v" patchedTag="patched/%e%v" upstreamTag="upstream/%e%u" in debian/.git-dpm and see if that makes it happy... so the issue is that that file doesn't exist ... but if i create it with those three lines in it, then: git-dpm record-new-upstream --allow-changes-in-debian-branch --new-tarball-only doesn't do anything. my understanding is that you add those three lines *after* .git-dpm has been created. so i'm still trying to figure out the right way to create it in this situation. with thanks jonathon
Bug#825105: RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient" * Package name: udfclient Version : 0.8.5-1 Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk * URL : http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/ * License : Clarified Artistic License Section : otherosfs It builds those binary packages: udfclient - userland implementation of the UDF filesystem To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/udfclient Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/udfclient/udfclient_0.8.5-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * Remove upstream patch Makefile.patch * Fix formatting of package description Regards, Pali Rohár signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#825105: marked as done (RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1)
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 16:37:21 + (UTC) with message-id <71202530.2115810.1464021442015.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825105: RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #825105, regarding RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 825105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825105 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient" * Package name: udfclient Version : 0.8.5-1 Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk * URL : http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/ * License : Clarified Artistic License Section : otherosfs It builds those binary packages: udfclient - userland implementation of the UDF filesystem To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/udfclient Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/udfclient/udfclient_0.8.5-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * Remove upstream patch Makefile.patch * Fix formatting of package description Regards, Pali Rohár signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, uploaded! g. Il Lunedì 23 Maggio 2016 18:12, Pali Rohár ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient" * Package name: udfclient Version : 0.8.5-1 Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk * URL : http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/ * License : Clarified Artistic License Section : otherosfs It builds those binary packages: udfclient - userland implementation of the UDF filesystem To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/udfclient Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/udfclient/udfclient_0.8.5-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * Remove upstream patch Makefile.patch * Fix formatting of package description Regards, Pali Rohár--- End Message ---
Bug#822107: marked as done (RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 17:52:26 + (UTC) with message-id <67274442.2180220.1464025946310.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #822107, regarding RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 822107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822107 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eja" * Package name: eja Version : 9.3.12-1 Upstream Author : Ubaldo Porcheddu * URL : https://github.com/ubaldus/eja * License : GPL Section : web It builds those binary packages: eja - micro web server for static and dynamic Lua generated content. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/eja Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eja/eja_9.3.12-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/ubaldus/eja. Regards, Ubaldo Porcheddu --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- sponsoring soon after quick chat. g.--- End Message ---
Bug#825126: RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scantailor" Package name: scantailor Version : 0.9.12.2-2 Upstream Author : Nate Craun URL : http://scantailor.org/ License : GPL-3+ Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: scantailor - interactive post-processing tool for scanned pages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scantailor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scantailor/scantailor_0.9.12.2-2.dsc More information about scantailor can be obtained from http://scantailor.org/. Changes since the last upload: * Enable hardening flags. Regards, Jason Crain
Bug#825126: marked as done (RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2)
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 20:47:40 + (UTC) with message-id <756086665.2351912.1464036460432.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825126: RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #825126, regarding RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 825126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825126 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scantailor" Package name: scantailor Version : 0.9.12.2-2 Upstream Author : Nate Craun URL : http://scantailor.org/ License : GPL-3+ Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: scantailor - interactive post-processing tool for scanned pages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scantailor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scantailor/scantailor_0.9.12.2-2.dsc More information about scantailor can be obtained from http://scantailor.org/. Changes since the last upload: * Enable hardening flags. Regards, Jason Crain --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, done! g. Il Lunedì 23 Maggio 2016 22:36, Jason Crain ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scantailor" Package name: scantailor Version : 0.9.12.2-2 Upstream Author : Nate Craun URL : http://scantailor.org/ License : GPL-3+ Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: scantailor - interactive post-processing tool for scanned pages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scantailor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scantailor/scantailor_0.9.12.2-2.dsc More information about scantailor can be obtained from http://scantailor.org/. Changes since the last upload: * Enable hardening flags. Regards, Jason Crain--- End Message ---
Bug#811455: RFS: qhttpengine/0.1.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
Hi Mattia, I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. I completely forgot to reply to your last email. I removed the debug package, bumped the standards version, and removed the Lintian override. As for the test suite, I was able to reproduce the failure and found the cause of the problem: the test suite expects the $HOME environment variable to be set to a valid directory. I worked around this problem by manually setting $HOME to /tmp in debian/rules. Please let me know if there is anything wrong with this. The latest changes have been uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/qhttpengine - Nathan On 2016-05-23 02:12 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Nathan! On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:51:22PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Did anything happened here in the past 1,5 months? Are you still interested in getting this into Debian?
Bug#821270: firefox-branding-iceweasel
Hello, Any progress on this? -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
