Re: PyEnsembl - how does that help us?

2021-05-19 Thread Steffen Möller
Quick update - I have package all dependencies fo xpore (and of
pyensembl with it) , packages are tagged orange on the spreadsheet's
"Nanopore" tab
(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tApLhVqxRZ2VOuMH_aPUgFENQJfbLlB_PFH_Ah_q7hM/edit#gid=1806578173)
- but, no idea how you are feeling about it all, but I think this better
waits till after the release.

@Nilesh, I want to run pyensembl locally to ensure that it works - it is
not too far from a  gigabyte that is downloaded if I am interpreting the
URLs right and am not erroneous, which just for testing purposes is a
bit too much.

Best,
Steffen


Am 18.05.21 um 15:15 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> On 5/18/21 6:16 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just packaged xpore, which points to
>> https://github.com/openvax/pyensembl to get various sorts of sequencing
>> data, also complete genomes. I like that and address its packaging now.
>> New packages are uploaded to PyPi, not release tagged, but, well, ... .
> Nice.
>
>> In my reading this is a way to get test data for various applications of
>> ours in a reproducible way. Since this packages only the routines to
>> retrieve the data, not the data itself, we cannot use that for package
>> autotests. However, we can still use it for testing our workflows if our
>> workflow-test-environment is allowed to have internet access, which I
>> think it should have.
> If internet access is the only bottle-neck, there's a needs-internet
> restriction[1] which can get this moving.
>
> [1]: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html
>
> Nilesh
>



Re: PyEnsembl - how does that help us?

2021-05-19 Thread Nilesh Patra



On 20 May 2021 3:42:20 am IST, "Steffen Möller"  wrote:
>Quick update - I have package all dependencies fo xpore (and of
>pyensembl with it) , packages are tagged orange on the spreadsheet's
>"Nanopore" tab
>(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tApLhVqxRZ2VOuMH_aPUgFENQJfbLlB_PFH_Ah_q7hM/edit#gid=1806578173)
>- but, no idea how you are feeling about it all, but I think this
>better
>waits till after the release.

This can be uploaded to NEW right now, no?
It won't anyway enter testing. Or do you want to wait for maybe more stable 
versions?

>@Nilesh, I want to run pyensembl locally to ensure that it works - it
>is
>not too far from a  gigabyte that is downloaded if I am interpreting
>the
>URLs right and am not erroneous, which just for testing purposes is a
>bit too much.

Yeah, right. Large size test data becomes an RC bug, for example here[1]
Probably we'll then have to keep testing it locally, unless ofcourse if it's 
possible to find a smaller dataset that is sensible on debci workers.

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964101

Nilesh
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.