Solved: X dies after inactivity on Inspiron 4100

2002-02-11 Thread Xaveer Leijtens
Thanks! That solved it.
-- 
Xaveer Leijtens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://oed.its.tudelft.nl

Mike Alborn wrote on 07-Feb-2002:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:49:44PM +0100, Xaveer Leijtens wrote:
> > I have a problem with X 4.1 on my inspiron 4100. I use the vesa driver.
> > After about 15 minutes of inactivity the X server dies:
> > 
> >   Fatal server error:
> >   Caught signal 11.  Server aborting
> > 
> > This happens even if I switch off apm kernel support and disable power
> > management from the BIOS. Otherwise, suspend (apm -s) works fine, even from
> > within X.
> > I run Debian testing, kernel 2.4.16 (but older kernels had the same
> > problem). Details about my setup are on http://pic.its.tudelft.nl/inspiron/
> > 
> > Does anyone know what is responsible for killing the X server?
> 
> This is just a shot in the dark, but check your XF86Config-4 file. In
> the "Monitor" section, there may be a line like:
> Option"DPMS"
> Remove/disable the line if it's there.
> 
> HTH & HAND,
> 
> -- 
> Mike Alborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # pgp keyid: C36DC30B
> # http://odoitau.dyn.dhs.org
> 
> The last vestiges of the old Republic have been swept away.
>   -- Governor Tarkin




terminal emulator

2002-02-11 Thread Laszlo . Kupcsik
Hi! I run Debian on a 486 with 8M RAM. I could find a low memory window
manager (lwm), but I still don't know if xterm is the most memory efficient
terminal emulator, or there is a better one. Any ideas?



Re: terminal emulator

2002-02-11 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:37:38AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! I run Debian on a 486 with 8M RAM. I could find a low memory window
> manager (lwm), but I still don't know if xterm is the most memory efficient
> terminal emulator, or there is a better one. Any ideas?

What about xvt, rxvt, wterm or even aterm?

-- 
Karl E. Jørgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.karl.jorgensen.com
 Today's fortune:
How do I type "for i in *.dvi do xdvi i done" in a GUI?
(Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the intuitiveness of interfaces.)


pgpdV4ghPc7io.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: terminal emulator

2002-02-11 Thread Ionel Mugurel Ciobica
> Hi! I run Debian on a 486 with 8M RAM. I could find a low memory window
> manager (lwm), but I still don't know if xterm is the most memory efficient
> terminal emulator, or there is a better one. Any ideas?
> 

Have you look to rxvt?

Ionel



Re: terminal emulator

2002-02-11 Thread Ross Burton
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 10:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! I run Debian on a 486 with 8M RAM. I could find a low memory window
> manager (lwm), but I still don't know if xterm is the most memory efficient
> terminal emulator, or there is a better one. Any ideas?

Before I was drawn into gnome-terminal and Eterm, I seem to remember
rxvt being a smaller xterm with nice features to boot.

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: LTModem

2002-02-11 Thread Derek Broughton
From: "Ignasi Palou-Rivera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I'm trying to upgrade the kernel I'm running on my Thinkpad from 2.4.7
> to 2.4.16
>
> I can't find any deb packages for the Lucent modem modules for current
> kernel versions. The last one I can find is for 2.4.14, before the
> major VM fixes. What's up?

Simon's obviously got you on the right track, but "what's up" is that 2.4.14
or later really _aren't_ current kernels.  They're 'testing' kernels, and
it's expectable that not all packages will be fully consistent at this
stage.  Unfortunately the LTmodem maintainers aren't that big on keeping
up - which is too bad since it's _really_ easy to create a .deb from the
source.

derek



Re: dell 4000

2002-02-11 Thread Derek Broughton
From: "Klaas Gadeyne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > IIRC, you can only have 7 total partitions: 3 primary, and 4 logical (or
is
> > it the other way around?), so you may have to lt youre hda4 be one big
> > partition for debian.
>
> Is this so??  I thought you could have more logical ones...
>
in the first place it's four primaries - one or more of which are containers
for logicals.  So there's no real reason you couldn't have 10 if you had 2
primaries containing 4 logicals each.

However, while there may be a limit to the number of logical partitions
allowed, my system has 3 primaries, (/hda1 is still Windows, /hda2 is /boot,
and /hda3 contains 6 logical partitions /hda5-/hda10 with the rest of my
linux system).

derek



Re: dell 4000

2002-02-11 Thread Jacques L'helgoualc'h
Derek Broughton a écrit, lundi 11 février 2002, à 09:14 :
> From: "Klaas Gadeyne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> > Is this so??  I thought you could have more logical ones...
> >
> in the first place it's four primaries - one or more of which are containers

Only *one* `container' is allowed with usual tools as c?fdisk.

> for logicals.  So there's no real reason you couldn't have 10 if you had 2
> primaries containing 4 logicals each.

You can use many logicals, up to 63 (IDE, maybe only 15 on SCSI...).  As
they are  chained together, you  can't just modify their  number without
updating /etc/fstab and lilo.conf or Grub menu.

> However, while there may be a limit to the number of logical partitions
> allowed, my system has 3 primaries, (/hda1 is still Windows, /hda2 is /boot,
> and /hda3 contains 6 logical partitions /hda5-/hda10 with the rest of my
> linux system).

If you  don't need seeing a  logical v?fat partition from  the dark side
system©, it is safer setting the container type to `Linux extended' (85)
than to `Extended' (05), as especially hda5 can be messed up.

-- 
Jacques L'helgoualc'h



Re: dell 4000

2002-02-11 Thread Derek Broughton
From: "Jacques L'helgoualc'h" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Derek Broughton a écrit, lundi 11 février 2002, à 09:14 :
> > From: "Klaas Gadeyne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]
> > > Is this so??  I thought you could have more logical ones...
> > >
> > in the first place it's four primaries - one or more of which are
containers
>
> Only *one* `container' is allowed with usual tools as c?fdisk.

Oh - I had never seen such a restriction, but then I hadn't tried to do it
either.  I'll bow to your expertise .

> > However, while there may be a limit to the number of logical partitions
> > allowed, my system has 3 primaries, (/hda1 is still Windows, /hda2 is
/boot,
> > and /hda3 contains 6 logical partitions /hda5-/hda10 with the rest of my
> > linux system).
>
> If you  don't need seeing a  logical v?fat partition from  the dark side
> system©, it is safer setting the container type to `Linux extended' (85)
> than to `Extended' (05), as especially hda5 can be messed up.

Well, thanks for that.  I didn't know that either.  And in checking I see
that I do, indeed, have a type 05 partition.  Annoying to hear though, since
hda5 is the most important partition on my system after the /boot partition.

derek



Re: dell 4000

2002-02-11 Thread Jacques L'helgoualc'h
Derek Broughton a écrit, lundi 11 février 2002, à 10:09 :
> From: "Jacques L'helgoualc'h" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> > Only *one* `container' is allowed with usual tools as c?fdisk.
>
> Oh - I had never seen such a restriction, but then I hadn't tried to do it
> either.  I'll bow to your expertise .

Ahem, my `expertise' is just experience in breaking things...

[...]
> Well, thanks for that.  I didn't know that either.  And in checking I see
> that I do, indeed, have a type 05 partition.

  sfdisk --id /dev/hda 3 85

should do the trick, as your extended partition is hda3.

>  Annoying to hear  though, since hda5 is the  most important partition
>  on my system after the /boot partition.

My hd[ab]5 are  swap, but it is not sufficient, as  the chain was broken
by  a one-month-try partition  magic. I  had to  do some  arithmetic for
getting back hda[6->14].

I recommend now using sfdisk --dump as backup

,
|-l [or --list]:  list partitions of each device
|-d [or --dump]:  idem, but in a format suitable for later input
`

HTH
-- 
Jacques L'helgoualc'h



internet connection

2002-02-11 Thread Axel Minck
Title: Message



Hi,
 
I am using Debian 
Potato on a Thinkpad T20.
I have a PCMCIA 
network card and my file network.opts is correctly 
configured.
Yet, i can't go out 
of my local network and i have to type : "rout del default" and "route add 
default gw xxx.xx.x.x" each time i reboot the system.
Is there any file to 
modify in order to avoid typing these commands each time ?
Thanks for your 
help
 
Axel


RE: internet connection

2002-02-11 Thread Glen S Mehn
Title: Message



can 
you post the contents of your /etc/pcmcia/network.opts, netstat -rn (before you 
route del defalut; route add default gw x.x.x.x) to the 
list?
 
-g

  -Original Message-From: Axel Minck 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:08 
  AMTo: debian-laptop@lists.debian.orgSubject: internet 
  connection
  Hi,
   
  I am using Debian 
  Potato on a Thinkpad T20.
  I have a PCMCIA 
  network card and my file network.opts is correctly 
  configured.
  Yet, i can't go 
  out of my local network and i have to type : "rout del default" and "route add 
  default gw xxx.xx.x.x" each time i reboot the system.
  Is there any file 
  to modify in order to avoid typing these commands each time 
  ?
  Thanks for your 
  help
   
  Axel


Re: internet connection

2002-02-11 Thread Michael Perry

Axel Minck wrote:

Hi,

 


I am using Debian Potato on a Thinkpad T20.

I have a PCMCIA network card and my file network.opts is correctly 
configured.


Yet, i can't go out of my local network and i have to type : "rout del 
default" and "route add default gw xxx.xx.x.x" each time i reboot the 
system.


Is there any file to modify in order to avoid typing these commands each 
time ?


Thanks for your help

 


Axel



Try looking at /etc/pcmcia/network.opts and enter your information for 
the pcmcia network card there.  You can also setup schemes to handle 
different networking requirements by using the schemes information at 
pcmcia-cs.sourceforge.net as an example.


The file network.opts is a flat text file so editing is pretty easy.


--
Michael Perry | "Do or do not; there is no try" Master Yoda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.lnxpowered.org




Internet connection (bis)

2002-02-11 Thread Axel Minck
Title: Message



Before typing route 
ass default gw 172.24.0.1, netstat -rn gives:
 
Destination    Gateway    
GenMask
172.24.0.0    
0.0.0.0    
255.255.0.0

172.24.0.0    
0.0.0.0    
255.255.0.0

172.24.0.0    
0.0.0.0    
255.255.0.0

0.0.0.0    
 172.24.0.1   0.0.0.0

0.0.0.0 
172.24.0.1   0.0.0.0
 
 
and my network.opts 
file is :
 
case "$ADDRESS" 
in*,*,*,*)    INFO="Sample private network 
setup"    # Transceiver selection, for some cards -- see 'man 
ifport'    IF_PORT=""    # Use BOOTP (via 
/sbin/bootpc, or /sbin/pump)? [y/n]    
BOOTP="n"    # Use DHCP (via /sbin/dhcpcd, /sbin/dhclient, or 
/sbin/pump)? [y/n]    DHCP="n"    # If you 
need to explicitly specify a hostname for DHCP requests    
DHCP_HOSTNAME=""    # Host's IP address, netmask, network 
address, broadcast address    
IPADDR="172.24.111.16"    
NETMASK="255.255.0.0"    
NETWORK="172.24.0.0"    
BROADCAST="172.24.255.255"    # Gateway address for static 
routing    GATEWAY="172.24.0.1"    # 
Things to add to /etc/resolv.conf for this interface    
DOMAIN="enpc.fr"    SEARCH=""    # The 
nameserver IP addresses specified here complement the    # 
nameservers already defined in /etc/resolv.conf.  These 
nameservers    # will be added to /etc/resolv.conf 
automatically when the PCMCIA    # network connection is 
established and removed from this file when    # the 
connection is broken.    
DNS_1="195.221.193.16"    DNS_2=""    
DNS_3=""    # NFS mounts, should be listed in 
/etc/fstab    MOUNTS=""    # If you need 
to override the interface's MTU...    
MTU=""    # For IPX interfaces, the frame type and network 
number    IPX_FRAME=""    
IPX_NETNUM=""    # Run ipmasq? [y/n]  (see the Debian 
ipmasq package)    IPMASQ="n"    # Extra 
stuff to do after setting up the interface    start_fn () { 
return; }    # Extra stuff to do before shutting down the 
interface    stop_fn () { return; }    # 
Card eject policy options    NO_CHECK=n    
NO_FUSER=n    ;;esac
 
 


Re: internet connection

2002-02-11 Thread Jacek M. Wuwer
Alex,

Unset the GATEWAY in your /etc/pcmcia/network.opts. 'network' script adds it 
automatically. 
If you want (need) to use gateway for specific networks set it up in your 
start_fn() function in /etc/pcmcia/network.opts.

Jacek



Re: Synaptics touchpad?

2002-02-11 Thread René Seindal
I haven't quite followed this thread, but there are at least two
packages, tpconfig and synaptics, that contain a program to control
various features of the synaptics touchpad, such as tapping, dragging,
tapping in corners etc.

It might be what you need.

René Seindal.

On søn, 2002-02-10 at 06:14, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-02-10 at 07:09, Dave Thayer wrote:
> > 
> >  /etc/gpm-syn.conf 
> > [use_wmode] Y
> > [corner_taps_enabled] Y
> > [upper_left_action] 3
> > [lower_left_action] 2
> > 
> > The only place that gpm-syn.conf is documented is in README.synaptics.
> > Note that README.synaptics is missing from the sid binary debs, but it
> > is in the source package. I have filed a bug report to get it included
> > because using gpm-syn.conf was the key to getting everything to behave. 
> 
> Man I _wish_ I'd been able to find that documentation.  I bought a
> laptop for my father recently and installed Linux on it but it became
> practically unusable because of all the 'smartness' of the default
> synaptics touchpad.  Especially for my father who is over 75...
> 
> I found the names of all these configuration things, as well as the name
> of the configuration file, by trolling through the gpm binary, but there
> is no way I would have guessed that sort of wierd syntax :-)
> 
> I sure wish I could have done a :
>   man 5 gpm-syn.conf
> or something.
> 
> Regards,
>   Andrew.
> -- 
> 
> Andrew @ Catalyst .Net.NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington
> WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
> DDI: +64(4)916-7201MOB: +64(21)635-694OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
>Are you enrolled at http://schoolreunions.co.nz/ yet?
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
René Seindal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])  http://www.seindal.dk/rene/
 



422 Genealogy Databases [2]

2002-02-11 Thread Angie's Genealogy
Below is a list of 422 Genealogy Databases with over 1.5 
billion names. 
I am offering to search these databases for only $1(US) 
per search.

Just send a minimum of $10(US) to:

Angie Giles
P.O.Box 873
Rowlett, TX, USA 75030-0873

Because of technical reasons beyond my control, I might 
not be able 
to receive emails that you send by replying to this email. 
Please send 
comments, suggestions and questions to the PO Box 
above.

Include the DBNO(Database Number) listed beside each 
database 
and the names your searching for and your email address. 
If there is 
more than 1 of the same name in a database, It will be $1
(US) per 
instance. I will email you the information that is listed for 
each 
instance of the name searched.

Notice: I cannot guarantee that the person you are looking 
for is in 
the database. You are paying for my time in looking up 
your names. 
I charge a minimum of $1(US) per database, even if there 
is no 
instances of the name your are looking for.

Thank You
Angie


DBNO-DB NAME

Birth Databases:
0010-Southern PA, 1680-1800
0015-US and Europe 900-1880
0020-British Isles, A-C #2
0025-British Isles, D-I #3
0030-British Isles, J-Q #4
0035-British Isles, R-Z #5
0040-North America, A-C #1

Cemetery Databases:
0100-Salt Lake City, 1848-1992

Census Databases:
0200-1850 Census Schedules
0205-1881 British Census, East Anglia Region #1
0210-1881 British Census, Greater London Region, 
London, Middlesex, A-
L #1
0215-1881 British Census, Greater London Region, 
London, Middlesex, 
M-Z CD 2
0220-1881 British Census, Midlands Region, West 
Counties A-Z
0225-1881 British Census, North Central Region York A-L #
3
0230-1881 British Census, North Central Region York M-Z
0235-1881 British Census, Northern Borders & Miscellary 
Region #1
0240-1881 British Census, Scotland Region, Highland 
Counties #1
0245-1881 British Census, Scotland Region, Lowland 
County #2
0250-1881 British Census, Southwestern Region, #1
0255-African Americans in the 1870 Census
0260-IA 1860
0265-UK 1851

Census Index Databases:
0300-1840 US Census Index: Mid-Atlantic 
0305-1881 British Census, Index A-B #1
0310-1881 British Census, Index C-Em #2
0315-1881 British Census, Index En-Hn #3
0320-1881 British Census, Index Hi-L #4
0325-1881 British Census, Index M-O #5
0330-1881 British Census, Index P-R #6
0335-1881 British Census, Index S-T #7
0340-1881 British Census, Index U-Z #8
0345-Baltimore, Chicago & St.Louis, 1870
0350-Colonial 1607-1789
0355-CT,MA,ME,NH,RI & VT 1900
0360-DE,DC,MD,PA,OH,VA & WV 1900
0365-GA 1870
0370-ID 1910
0375-MA 1870
0380-NC,SC 1870
0385-NY City 1870
0390-OH 1880
0395-Ontario, CN 1871
0400-PA,DE,NJ 1850
0405-US Selected Counties 1790
0410-US Selected Counties 1800
0415-US Selected Counties 1810
0420-US Selected Counties 1820
0425-US Selected Counties 1830
0430-US Selected Counties 1840
0435-US Selected Counties 1850
0440-US Selected Counties 1860
0445-US Selected Counties 1870
0450-US Selected Counties 1880
0455-VA,WV 1870
0460-VA,WV,NC,KY 1870
0465-Western PA 1870
0470-Western PA 1870

Census Microfilm Databases:
0500-AL,AR,LA & MS 1850 #1
0505-AL,AR,LA & MS 1850 #2
0510-AL,AR,LA & MS 1850 #3
0515-AL,AR,LA & MS 1850 #4
0520-AL,AR,LA & MS 1850 #6
0525-CA,NM,OR,TX & UT 1850 #1
0530-CA,NM,OR,TX & UT 1850 #3
0535-CA,NM,OR,TX & UT 1850 #4
0540-CT & RI 1850 CD 1
0545-CT & RI 1850 CD 2
0550-CT & RI 1850 CD 3
0555-CT & RI 1850 CD 4
0560-IL 1850 #1
0565-IL 1850 #3
0570-IL 1850 #4
0575-IN 1850 #3
0580-IN 1850 #4
0585-IN 1850 #5
0590-MA 1850 #1
0595-MA 1850 #3
0600-MA 1850 #4
0605-MA 1850 #5
0610-MA 1850 #6
0615-ME,NH & VT 1850 #2
0620-ME,NH & VT 1850 #3
0625-ME,NH & VT 1850 #4
0630-ME,NH & VT 1850 #5
0635-NC 1850 #1
0640-NC 1850 #2
0645-NC 1850 #3
0650-NC 1850 #4
0655-PA 1850 #1
0660-PA 1850 #11
0665-PA 1850 #2
0670-PA 1850 #3
0675-PA 1850 #4
0680-PA 1850 #5
0685-PA 1850 #6
0690-PA 1850 #7
0695-PA 1850 #8
0700-TN 1850 #3

Church Databases:
0805-Adams, Berks & Lancaster Co., PA 1729-1881
0810-English Parish Records, Staffordshire, Warwickshire, 
Derbyshire
0815-English Parish Records, Yorkshire, Ainsty & City of 
York
0820-English Parish Records, Yorkshire, East Riding
0825-English Parish Records, Yorkshire, North Riding, 
Durham
0830-English Parish Records, Yorkshire, West Riding, 
Nottinghamshire
0835-MD & DE, 1600s-1800s
0840-PA German 1729-1870
0845-PA,Adams Co.,1745-1825 #3
0850-PA,Berks Co., 1752-1825 #4
0855-PA,Lancaster Co., 1729-1825 #11
0860-Selected Areas of PA 1600s-1800s
0865-Tithe Applotment Books: 1823-1838

Deaths Databases:
0905-AL 1908-1959
0910-Directory of Deceased American Physicians 1804-
1929
0915-IA 1882-1920
0920-NY 1700s-1900s
0925-Social Security Death Index: A-L US 1937-1997 #1
0930-Social Security Death Index: M-Z US 1937-1997 #2
0935-US 1850-1880

Deeds Databases:
1000-Mayflower Vital Records: Deeds and Wills 1600-1900

Family Databases:
1055-217 Genealogy Books
1060-Ancestral File 1998 #1
1065-Ancestral File 1998 #2
1070-Ancestral File 1998 #3
1075-Ancestral File 1998 #4
1080-An

terminal emulator

2002-02-11 Thread Laszlo . Kupcsik

Hi! I run Debian on a 486 with 8M RAM. I could find a low memory window
manager (lwm), but I still don't know if xterm is the most memory efficient
terminal emulator, or there is a better one. Any ideas?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: terminal emulator

2002-02-11 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen

On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:37:38AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! I run Debian on a 486 with 8M RAM. I could find a low memory window
> manager (lwm), but I still don't know if xterm is the most memory efficient
> terminal emulator, or there is a better one. Any ideas?

What about xvt, rxvt, wterm or even aterm?

-- 
Karl E. Jørgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.karl.jorgensen.com
 Today's fortune:
How do I type "for i in *.dvi do xdvi i done" in a GUI?
(Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the intuitiveness of interfaces.)



msg06689/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: terminal emulator

2002-02-11 Thread Ionel Mugurel Ciobica

> Hi! I run Debian on a 486 with 8M RAM. I could find a low memory window
> manager (lwm), but I still don't know if xterm is the most memory efficient
> terminal emulator, or there is a better one. Any ideas?
> 

Have you look to rxvt?

Ionel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: terminal emulator

2002-02-11 Thread Ross Burton

On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 10:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! I run Debian on a 486 with 8M RAM. I could find a low memory window
> manager (lwm), but I still don't know if xterm is the most memory efficient
> terminal emulator, or there is a better one. Any ideas?

Before I was drawn into gnome-terminal and Eterm, I seem to remember
rxvt being a smaller xterm with nice features to boot.

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: LTModem

2002-02-11 Thread Derek Broughton

From: "Ignasi Palou-Rivera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I'm trying to upgrade the kernel I'm running on my Thinkpad from 2.4.7
> to 2.4.16
>
> I can't find any deb packages for the Lucent modem modules for current
> kernel versions. The last one I can find is for 2.4.14, before the
> major VM fixes. What's up?

Simon's obviously got you on the right track, but "what's up" is that 2.4.14
or later really _aren't_ current kernels.  They're 'testing' kernels, and
it's expectable that not all packages will be fully consistent at this
stage.  Unfortunately the LTmodem maintainers aren't that big on keeping
up - which is too bad since it's _really_ easy to create a .deb from the
source.

derek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: dell 4000

2002-02-11 Thread Derek Broughton

From: "Klaas Gadeyne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > IIRC, you can only have 7 total partitions: 3 primary, and 4 logical (or
is
> > it the other way around?), so you may have to lt youre hda4 be one big
> > partition for debian.
>
> Is this so??  I thought you could have more logical ones...
>
in the first place it's four primaries - one or more of which are containers
for logicals.  So there's no real reason you couldn't have 10 if you had 2
primaries containing 4 logicals each.

However, while there may be a limit to the number of logical partitions
allowed, my system has 3 primaries, (/hda1 is still Windows, /hda2 is /boot,
and /hda3 contains 6 logical partitions /hda5-/hda10 with the rest of my
linux system).

derek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]