Bug#696244: console freezes when switching back to tty7 after X started and plymouth was used
On 06/06/2013 08:21 AM, Marc Haber wrote: > Is this really a kernel issue? yes; if you want to rule it out, start plymouth with the text theme and 'nomodeset'. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51b02bb4.1020...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#872414: FTBFS with linux-libc-dev << 4.11 >= 4.12
Package: linux Version: 4.12.16-1 Hi, linux FTBFS if linux-libc-dev << 4.11 is installed, but it also fails to rebuild if linux-libc-dev from unstable is installed. Failure with << 4.11 is like this: /build/linux-4.12.6-1/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.c: In function ‘decode_misc_feature_control’: /build/linux-4.12.6-1/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.c:3915:25: error: ‘MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL’ undeclared (first use in this) if (!get_msr(base_cpu, MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, &msr)) ^~~~ [...] Failure with >= 4.12 is that it doesn't find asm/msr-index.h. Regards, Daniel
Bug#787004: FTBFS on amd64
Package: linux Version: 4.0.4-1 Severity: serious Hi, your last upload fails to build on amd64, see buildlog: ---snip--- [...] install -d debian/kernel-image-4.0.0-2-amd64-di/lib/modules/4.0.0-2-amd64 install -m 644 debian/linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64/lib/modules/4.0.0-2-amd64/modules.builtin debian/linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64/lib/modules/4.0.0-2-amd64/modules.order debian/kernel-image-4.0.0-2-amd64-di/lib/modules/4.0.0-2-amd64/ install -D -m 644 debian/linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64/boot/System.map-4.0.0-2-amd64 debian/kernel-image-4.0.0-2-amd64-di/boot/System.map kernel-wedge copy-modules 4.0.0-2 amd64 4.0.0-2-amd64 missing module i2o_block missing module i2o_scsi command exited with status 1 make[2]: *** [install-udeb_amd64] Error 2 debian/rules.real:424: recipe for target 'install-udeb_amd64' failed make[2]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make[1]: *** [binary-arch_amd64] Error 2 debian/rules.gen:19: recipe for target 'binary-arch_amd64' failed make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 debian/rules:42: recipe for target 'binary-arch' failed ---snap--- Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5565fc9a.20...@progress-technologies.net
Bug#796005: 4.1.5-1 FTBFS on i386
Package: linux Version: 4.1.5-1 Severity: serious Hi, the last upload failed to build on i386 as gpio_keys_polled and leds-gpi have not yet properly enabled but already reference in the d-i include file. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
Bug#488208: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6-686: vbox version 1.5.6 not 1.6.2
tags 488208 +pending thanks Aris Karagiannidis wrote: > The virtualbox on the repositories is version 1.6.2 but the vbox module is > version is 1.5.6 > and thus is makes the package unsusuable with the following mesage. as soon as .25 goes to testing, which will happen rsn, this is fixed. in the meanwhile, you need to update virtualbox-ose-modules by hand with running m-a a-i virtualbox-ose. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385553: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please provide pre-built ndiswrapper modules
Any progress on ndiswrapper? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#488343: linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686: useless dependency on gcc-4.1
Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Why? Eevn if you must depend on a compiler (and I don't see that, either), > why won't just any version of gcc do? because you need to use the same compiler version that was used to build the kernel in order to build modules against the headers. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.25-2 testing sync
maximilian attems wrote: > please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2, > linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5 linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 can go too. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385553: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please provide pre-built ndiswrapper modules
Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't at home in the last 2 weeks. Should get uploaded this > week. I will do some final builds and tests and see if my AM sponsors it, > else I will look for another sponsor. take your time - there won't be a 2.6.25 upload anymore anyways; please directly head for 2.6.26. Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Hi, please schedule binNMUs for linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 in order to get it in sync with the archive again. Thanks, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490906: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6: fglrx-module is outdated
tags 490906 +pending forwarded 490906 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Hi, will be fixed by binNMU. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Adeodato Simó wrote: > Could you ellaborate on what is the binNMU intended to achieve? see #490906. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Adeodato Simó wrote: > Is it i386 only? since 'XS-Autobuild: yes' in control is not evaluated, yes. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Adeodato Simó wrote: > However, it seems the package is not marked for building in the > experimental buildd network, so I can't schedule a binNMU. doing a sourceful upload then, thanks. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 binNMU
Adeodato Simó wrote: > You could fix the problem forever instead, doing what Luk said. as you maybe have read on -private, my forced vac due to military service is approaching. i don't have the time to bet my money on the chance that somebody will process the request in time. in order to not block a possible .26 upload soon by waiting until a complying lmn migrated to testing, i'll upload .25 modules now, ask for whitelisting now so that it is in place for next time. but i guess you figured that already. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removing r6040 driver from l-m-e-2.6
Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > I intend to remove r6040 from l-m-e-2.6. > > Reasons: > - Provided by the upstream kernel > - Differences between the version in the kernel (both 2.6.26 and > 2.6.27-rc2, marked as 0.16 and 0.18) and the standalone version > (marked as 0.17) are huge. It is not possible to see any code > differences in the diff. ack. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Handling of linux-modules-*-2.6 during freeze
Luk Claes wrote: > t-p-u is not the best alternative IMHO, we're not talking about some > package (linux-modules-*2.6) we can easily take out of the release if it > breaks without harming lots of users... ack. > Either we remove virtualbox-ose from the release or we accept the > version in unstable AFAICS, though as I asked before, please let the > maintainers comment... it was stupid to upload 1.6.6 to unstable, however, the the only sane thing imho is, to unblock vbox and let that vesion into lenny. the version should be fine. everything else is even more a hassle. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Handling of linux-modules-*-2.6 during
Michael Meskes wrote: >> it was stupid to upload 1.6.6 to unstable, however, the the only sane > > Which of course is easy to say in hindsight. I do not remember seeing a > similar > statement before the upload. how suprising is that when the upload was made by patrick without prior discussion/announcement/communication/$whatever on the list. however, as indicated already, past is past. > This btw is also the reason why it > was uploaded to sid. After all it fixes some bugs. for the records: the new upstream version only fixes two bugs: #495028 which is a cosmetic thing and not worth the trouble, and #499623 which is absolutely unimportant - 2.6.27 is post lenny anyway. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#419254: linux-headers-2.6.20-1-k7: Fails to install due to missing dep
tags 419254 +pending thanks John Goerzen wrote: > linux-headers-2.6.20-1-k7 depends on linux-kbuild-2.6.20; however: > Package linux-kbuild-2.6.20 is not installed. linux-kbuild-2.6 is waiting in NEW. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#419841: linux-headers-2.6.20-1-686 not installable
forcemerge 419841 419254 thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > linux-headers-2.6.20-1-686: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.20 but it is not > installable > E: Broken packages linux-kbuild is blocked by NEW. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what's up with #430646?
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > What's up with bug #430646? The kernel team has (AFAICT) ignored the > existence of the bug. can you calm down a bit please? First of all, this is unstable, you know, the distribution which can have breakages from time to time... Second, I do not upload new packages every five minutes just for some minor changes, otherwise buildd maintainers are going to hate me. Instead, I wanted to clarify the reason why ivtv fails[0] to build on mips (#431411). This is a breakage /unrelated/ to the ipw* breakage and needs to be addressed too. Excately *one* minute before you send your mail, Ian Campbel just said, I should just ignore mips for ivtv, so a new upload of linux-modules-contrib-2.6 makes sense *now*, that I have all the information I need. Third, conglomeration modules are a service to make things easier. Atm only this services seems to fail for ipw* modules, however they do all compile just well with module-assistant. If you are in a hurry, you can always just build the module yourself with: # m-a a-i ipw3945 Thanks for your patience, or not Daniel [0] http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=linux-modules-contrib-2.6 -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r9067 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/debian: . templates
Bastian Blank wrote: >> Log: > > What? that one was a mistake, sorry. The log should have been, for that very commit: * Building against 2.6.21-2. * Added myself to uploaders. >> -Uploaders: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frederik Schüler <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]>, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> +Uploaders: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frederik Schüler <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]>, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]> > > NACK. Ask first. we have spoken about that some weeks ago on #d.d, you were ok with it that i'll take care about the addition of the intel firmwares (ipw2100/ipw2200; which require some interactive stuff in order to fulfil the license terms). now, i just added the iwl* ones first, because they are less complicated (same license as ipw3945). is this no longer ok? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r9069 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree: . debian iwl3945
Bastian Blank wrote: >> Log: >> Added iwl3945 firwmare, version 2.14.4. > > We don't need one package per file. so you'd rather want one for both iwl things, like.. firmware-iwlwifi? i personally like it better, to have them separated, not because upstream makes also two packages, but because 99% of all people do have either one card, or the other, but not both on the same machine. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r9069 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree: . debian iwl3945
Frans Pop wrote: > But then, you also get loads of modules for which you don't have hardware > if you install a linux-image-* package... linux-image-* are free, the firmwares are not. i'd like to have only minimal bits of non-free/binary-only stuff on my system. however, this is just me. > I'd agree with Bastian that avoiding unnecessary package fragmentation is > good. In theory, you could even go so far as to lump together are > wireless drivers in one binary package, though it probably makes sense to > keep drivers separate if they have dependencies on other packages in the > archive. no problem, so i'll merge firmware-iwl* to firmware-iwlwifi? what about ipw2100, ipw2200 and ipw3945? the first two ones require a interactive license agreement by the user (like the one sun-java* packages have), the last one not. should i add ipw2100/ipw2200 as individual packages, or would you prefere to have a new single one for al ipw* firmwares? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r9069 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree: . debian iwl3945
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 09:23:01AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: >> no problem, so i'll merge firmware-iwl* to firmware-iwlwifi? > > The licenses are the same. i know, that's what i said, so again, explicitly: should i merge firmware-iwl3945 and firmware-iwl4965 into firmware-iwlwifi? >> what about ipw2100, ipw2200 and ipw3945? > > 2100 and 2200 are not really distributable currently. 3945 have a > similar license to the iwl ones. i know. that's what i've already said in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> before. the bottom line of the thread on legal about ipw2100/ipw2200 is, that if we display the license to the user (similar as sun-java* does it), we can distribute it. that's also what we have talked about in #debian.de in march. > ftp-master won't accept 2x00 until we have something written that it is > okay to distribute them. i would point them to this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/03/msg00034.html -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r9072 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree: debian ipw3945 iwl3945 iwl4965
Bastian Blank wrote: > I intend to extend the config. nice, thanks. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of linux-modules-contrib-2.6
Bastian Blank wrote: > What is the state of linux-modules-contrib-2.6? It fails to build on > several arches because of ivtv. see #431411. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433527: add kqemu modules
tags 433527 +pending thanks I've moved kqemu about two weeks ago already... together with some other additions (e.g. aufs), it is waiting for linux-kbuild 2.6.22 entering sid in order to be uploaded... -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433527: add kqemu modules
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > Ok, but #433525 seems to be a blocker for this. Will you include that fix > in next kqemu-source upload? the patch seems flawed, it did not build at all once i applied. will have to investigate. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388727: squashfs-module: Kernel module source apprently for 2.6.18
Hi, please note that this was for both, unionfs and squashfs, requested by waldi. Hence, this bug is a non-issue, actually. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383248: Suggestion about usplash-themes
is there any news about this? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391626: Please include mol into linux-modules-extra before etch
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: unionfs is currently deactivated in SVN. should not be deactivated; unionfs does work since 1.4-2 and waldi is informed that he has do adapt from [...]/linux-2.6 to [...]/build. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399310: Please include ipw3945
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6 Severity: wishlist Hi, please include ipw3945. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396630: squashfs broken on amd64
retitle 396630 needs rebuild and ABI bump for 2.6.18-2 thanks Hi waldi, it is now nearly a month ago when I submitted this bug. In the meantime, I pinged you at least three times about it, where you've choosen to answer others but not to me. This is not like I wanted to have it work out. Giving all the "control" up to you and the kernel-team for building the modules binary packages implies, that you're actually taking care of it, because we, the module-source maintainers have no influence anymore on it. Please also note that Debian Live relays critically on the availability of unionfs and squashfs module packages - since a month we can't build any images anymore. This is a serious drawback. Please, do something now. Otherwise, I'm NMU'in on sunday. Maybe it is even better to take back the binary-modules into the unionfs-source package if linux-modules-extra-2.6 stays unmaintained. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#383248: Suggestion about usplash-themes
Are there now any news about uploading the new usplash upstream version of ubuntu to debian? We're waiting since.. well, quite a while. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: conglomeration modules for ivtv-source & zaptel-source
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Bastian Blank wrote: >> And the kernel team may overtake it. waldi granted me svn write access, so I can help out on l-m-e. In return, I commited l-m-c/n to the svn a few minutes ago. This is really good, now all conglomeration packages are maintained in the same place. Thanks waldi, really appreciated. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405232: linux-modules-contrib-2.6: Include packages for rt2400 & rt2500
Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> * the $module-source package should install a tar.bz2 as >> /usr/src/$module.tar.bz2. Currently, it is a tar.gz, so this needs >> to be changed. > > I will change that. note that the next upload of l-m-e-2.6 will be for etch, so your updated source packages must be in etch before. > That's ok for me. Would it be possible to build the rt2x00 and rt2570 > packages? I guess a new upload of linux-modules-extra-2.6 will have to > go through NEW, so better add more modules at the same time. sure. just to make sure: do you mean in addition or as a replacement for rt2400 and rt2500? >> * should the modules be build for all flavours and arches, or are >> there any which the maintainers would like to have excluded? > > This module is a driver for wireless cards, so I guess it is useful on > most architectures but sparc and s390. I know it has been used on i386, > amd64, powerpc and sparc. noted. > I will upload them in the next few hours. perfect, thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405232: linux-modules-contrib-2.6: Include packages for rt2400 & rt2500
Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Ok, then I am not sure it is possible for each. I will contact the > release team when the packages will be aged enough. good. will wait for a note from you when they will enter testing. if you know it in advance, a note a day before would be nice, so i could prepare l-m-e-2.6 already. in any case, if it will not make it into etch, i will add it afterwards in sid autonomously. > Yes, in addition. rt2x00 should eventually replace rt2400, rt2500 and > rt2570, but it is not working with all cards. ok. > Oops, sorry, I have made a mistake there. I meant all but m68k and s390. > The driver is working on sparC. np. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405270: machine hangs after loading ipw3945d
Michael Setzer wrote: > Even if I don't see any soft lockup messages on the console or in my > syslog/bootlog I agree with you that waiting for the next driver/daemon > release is a good idea. :) version 1.1.3 of ipw3945 was uploaded to unstable in the last days, if you're 'still' using the old one, please upgrade and try again. if not, are you using 2.6.18 or someting newer? indepentent of that, the solved softlock thing was not kill-switch related but to newer kernel versions than 2.6.18. with a previous version of the regulatory daemon end of the summer, i had some similar issues as you described them with the kill switch too on my x60. additionally, when switching the kill-switch rapidly on and off while doing a network restart, the whole machine occasionally freezed. both phenomenons are, funnily, no longer occuring with ipw3945d of current sid. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper
Hi, ndiswrapper was already heavily discussed if it belongs to main or to contrib. The result is, that it's still in main. I do not think that it is the task of the kernel-team to judge about this /on the conglomeration package/. If the kernel-team disagrees about having ndiswrapper beeing in main, someones has to re-continue the discussion on the ndiswrapper source package, otherwise it shall be accepted that it is in main, including the packages build out of a conglomeration package. Therefore, if ndiswrapper does indeed work with 4k stack, im going to add ndiswrapper to l-m-e-2.6. If it doesn't and will not in the forseeable near future, Kel should please close this bug. Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper
maximilian attems wrote: > and who gets *stupid* unparsable oops reports! ...which gets reassigned to the source-package. > yes i disagree. > the only use of ndiswrapper to run proprietary junk. > so it's a clear fit to contrib. feel free to re-start discussion where ever it is appropriate (but here, it's definitely not). independently of that, it doesn't matter from the kernel team point of view, it its in the l-m-e-2.6 or if it is in the l-m-c-2.6 package. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper
maximilian attems wrote: > it would be cool if random bug reporter, > would have the deceny to _accept_ mail. indeed :/ > closing due to unresponsive bug reporter. fine with me. kel, please reopen and set the owner accordingly to a working address if you ask for inclusion. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387760: linux-modules-extra-2.6: adding linux-wlan-ng modules
Hi, I had a look at linux-wlan-ng, it is indeed dual-licensed under MPL and GPL, hence from the license point of view, it is possible to include linux-wlan-ng into the conglomeration package. I made a successful testbuild on i386 and amd64. Do you still request its inclusion? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387760: linux-modules-extra-2.6: adding linux-wlan-ng modules
Enrico Tassi wrote: > Yes sure. ok, adding before doing the next upload. > I'll ask the upstream if this .c file is under this license for a good > reason... since this particular file is not distributable at all, you should remove it from the orig.tar.gz in the meanwhile (also in testing). -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387760: linux-modules-extra-2.6: adding linux-wlan-ng modules
Enrico Tassi wrote: > unless you sponsor the upload for Victor, that is currently in the nm queue no problem, tell me when you're ready and where the sources are. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387760: linux-modules-extra-2.6: adding linux-wlan-ng modules
Victor Seva wrote: > Hi Daniel, Hi, > the sources are in: > http://linux-wlan-ng.alioth.debian.org/deb/etch/ ( etch version ) > http://linux-wlan-ng.alioth.debian.org/deb/0.2.6+svn20061108+dfsg/ ( > unstable version ) I don't think that a source package in main is allowed to build one (or more) contrib binary packages. What would be the consequences for users if you would drop the file in question completely? -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387760: linux-modules-extra-2.6: adding linux-wlan-ng modules
Bastian Blank wrote: > It is allowed and dak supports this; but ftp-team will only accept this > if there are good reasons to do so. thanks for the note. it just felt so strange to me, that i wasn't sure. good that i know now :) anyway, i checked both packages, the modified rules works, so both uploaded. thanks for beeing so quick victor. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New release of gspca (webcams support)
Otavio Salvador wrote: > also request a new upload of linux-modules-extra-2.6. I'm (already) taking care of this. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New release of gspca (webcams support)
Steve Langasek wrote: > What does gspca have to do with linux-modules-extra-2.6? The current > l-m-e-2.6 build-depends on spca5xx-source, not on gspca-source. fyi: it is already changed in SVN for some time and was uploaded, but was removed from NEW due to some issues with linux-wlan-ng. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New release of gspca (webcams support)
Steve Langasek wrote: > Neither of which are changes that have been discussed with the release team. > Why are such extensive changes being made without discussion to a package > which it's known will need a reupload for the upcoming kernel ABI change? from the conglomeration-package point of view, linux-wlan-ng does not need any discussion with release-team: the issues with it are the problem of the maintainer, not the kernel-team. remeber that the conglomeration-package just prebuilds binary modules out of the already accepted sources. gspac seems to be wise to have it in etch due to various reasons. in case it has to be dropped again, that is a one line change and very easy to do for the conglomeration package /before/ it will enter testing, we are just speaking about unstable here. the upcoming abi bump doesn't have to do something with the conglomeration packages, they needed to be uploaded anyway, and just the fact of additional uploads to unstable per se do not harm release-team (if they do, one should maybe consider hard-freezing unstable too). -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New release of gspca (webcams support)
Daniel Baumann wrote: > gspac seems to be wise to have it in etch due to various reasons. in > case it has to be dropped again, that is a one line change and very easy > to do for the conglomeration package /before/ it will enter testing, we > are just speaking about unstable here. oh, i revert that, just seen that it is already in testing, hence gspca within the conglomeration package is also not of any interest for release-team. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383248: Suggestion about usplash-themes
maximilian attems wrote: > i'm currently a bit short of time. > so i won't push newer usplash for now. hm. how long do you expect to be busy? I would really like to have the new one, so, if this takes longer than a week or two, would you mind if I step in as additional co-maintainer and upload 0.4x to experimental then? -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383248: (kein Betreff)
Bastian Venthur wrote: > I could co-maintain the package if you want. i think, man-power isn't the problem. > I've already build the current version of usplash and it works like a charm. same here. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409076: IPW2200BG Wireless LAN does not work
retitle 409076 ipw2200 does not work with mainline ieee80211 reopen 409076 thanks > anyway unless you provide evidence of the "does not work" > aka a fine dmesg error output, some lspci -vv output > test 2.6.19 and/or 2.6.20-rc6 see apt lines > -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel > i'll close your bug report right away the current driver version refuses atm to work with the mainline ieee80211 headers when using wap/wep, if using the intel oot ones, it works. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409076: IPW2200BG now works
Bernhard wrote: > Should i open a bugreport in WPA_SUPPLICANT? please retitle and reassign this one here, thanks. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405232: include rt2400/rt2500/rt2570/rt2x00
Sam Morris wrote: > Is there any progress on this? Will the updated packages enter etch? 2007-01-30 12:45:54 < panthera> aurel32: any nex about the r modules? 2007-01-30 12:46:00 < panthera> s/nex/news/ 2007-01-30 13:29:03 < aurel32> panthera: it won't be possible to get the current version in etch 2007-01-30 13:29:09 < aurel32> panthera: so that will be for lenny 2007-01-30 13:35:40 < panthera> aurel32: too bad :/ nevertheless, thanks for your efforts. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper
Sam Morris wrote: > Re-opening, I would like to see binary packages of the ndiswrapper > modules in Debian. if the mainainer re-appears, i'll add ndiswrapper. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper
Sam Morris wrote: > Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel has a bouncing email address. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper
Sam Morris wrote: > Right, but who is Kel--just the bug submitter? I would have submitted a > bug myself if I didn't notice this one already in the BTS. Kel is co-maintainer of ndiswrapper and uses his broken email address not just for reporting bugs but also to maintain his packages. > It seemed that this bug was being ignored on the pretext that the > submitter's email address didn't work, which seems like a stupid reason > not to include ndiswrapper in linux-modules-2.6-extra. It has been said that the maintainer must agree before his packages are going to be included. As of now, there is no such sign of agreement, just a "signal of noice" from a non-working email address. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#365094: unionfs: 1.1.4+20060417.0541+debian-2
Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Now there is, sorry. At the time of writing before, it wasn't. Now it is. > Ok, reading the log explains why it is not working on m68k. The buildd tries > to execute scripts/basic/fixdep from the linux-headers package. And as > somebody else noted before, this does not run on m68k, since it was > (cross-)built on i386, but only the kernel is cross-built, not the binaries. > So it is either the fault of the linux-2.6 package, which does not properly > cross-compile binaries in its packages, or my fault, since I do not want to > wait a week for the packages to compile natively. Thanks for the explanation ;) -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openvz 2.6.8
dann frazier wrote: > We can't legally distribute that source, so we remove it. This happens > in many packages in Debian - see all the .orig.tar.gz's with a "dfsg" string. Why doesn't have the kernels orig.tar.gz no +dfsg string then? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Decision about oot-modules for etch
Hi, as stated in [0], waldi is working on an oot-module conglomeration package to solve NEW spamming for oot-module packages when the kernel ABI is bumped. As stated in [1], there are though about to not allow other oot-modules in main outside of the conglomeration package for etch. As discussed on IRC at the end of june with aba and HE, they are in favour to dropp those modules from the release-team point of view. Now, I would like to have a definitive statement for that to get everything prepared for etch (basically the ipw packages[2]). This means, a decision of the kernel-team and the release-team is required. Atm, there are the following questions open: * What is the ETA for the linux-modules-extra package in the archive? * Will be oot-modules in main outside of the linux-modules-extra be removed by the release-team for etch? * Will there be something similar for contrib modules too (e.g. linux-modules-contrib)? * If no conglomeration package for contrib modules, will oot-modules of contrib be removed by the release-team for etch? * If contrib oot-modules outside of a conglomeration packages will not be removed, will it be possible to have updates to the usual conditions for point-releases, or, will this be refused for oot-modules of contrib given no contrib-conglomeration package is done? Regards, Daniel [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/06/msg00438.html [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/06/msg00441.html [2] The ipw drivers are in the kernel mainline (ipw3945 will hopefully follow soon). Given that Intel does lack several weeks to month behind with the integration of their independent release drivers into mainline, it is nice to have those drivers as oot-modules too in the archive (especially for later backporting once etch is released and without the need of using a backported kernel too). Therefore, a decision is required for me, otherwise I'm not going to do potentially useless work to convert them to oot when they will be removed in a month or two anyway. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decision about oot-modules for etch
Andreas Barth wrote: > AFAICS ipw doesn't provide oot-modules, but only ipw*-source. Is that > correct? As I wrot in '[2]' of the previous mail, I want ipw2100 and ipw2200 (and, therefore also ieee8201) as oot, *although* they are already in mainline. But I'm not going to do that when a few weeks afterwards they are removed anyway in favour for a conglomeration package. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decision about oot-modules for etch
Andreas Barth wrote: > I don't see any release-team decisions required right now. :) I beg to differ, see below. > Basically, I tend to something like: > >> * Will be oot-modules in main outside of the linux-modules-extra be >> removed by the release-team for etch? > > If there are fewer (source) packages to be rebuild in case of kernel abi > changes, that's something good. If "all important" modules are there, we > might consider to deprecate/disallow other packages to require to be > rebuild in case of kernel changes. I don't really mind to make one > exception for some package if there are good reasons; but if that means > that 40 maintainers start jumping because their package should get the > exception, that boils down to no exception. :) That's the reason why I ask. I know about this "if 'all important' modules are there, we might consider to deprecate/disallow other packages" since the discussion with you on IRC end of june already. It's way to uncertain to have still the same statement and I think, it's late enough to nail that down, because if maintainers shall put their packages together, they have know that now and start doing that now. Can you make an announcement to all oot-module maintainers, telling them that they should put their packages together into linux-modules-extra (for main) or a similar one for contrib, and if they're not doing it, they will end up in an unsupported (no updates for point-releases, no updates for kernel ABI bump updates) package. > As to allow new packages with build oot-modules: I'm not too sure if we > should allow that, as every module makes a kernel update more > complicated. But of course, you could try to convince us that ipw is > important enough for that. Let's get the generic thing above first, after that, depending on your 'decision', there is more specifically for ipw needed or not. > Same for contrib: If there is no alternative to single packages, well, > we need to use single packages. Also, how many packages in contrib > generate oot-modules? If there are only 1 or 2, why bother? I think it's less than 10. > I don't see a reason to refuse upgrades during point release right now. > If the oot-package with their own modules are updated, everything is > fine. Updates during point release are more problematic with a > conglomeration package, as all binary packages need to be rebuild, > forcing users a (potentially) unneeded package upgrade. (Of course, > there are the normal rules for stable updates as well.) Ok. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decision about oot-modules for etch
Steve Langasek wrote: > I don't see anything of the sort stated there, and it's not the kernel > team's place to disallow such packages anyway. I asked waldi for explaining this 'unsupported idea' which svenl was indicating in the mentioned mail. waldi explained me in that IRC discussion at the end of june, that they (the kernel-team) will recommend to RM to not allow other (oot?) modules for etch at all. According to your answer, this seems not to have happened (already?). Well, and my original mail has only the intention to get precise information about those different things beeing said from different persons wrt/ oot-modules in etch. I do that some time in advance so that I will have time enough to react and adapt for having everything ready for etch. Atm, I've the impression, that this is not taken as a serious effort. After these few mails, I'm none the wiser now. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decision about oot-modules for etch
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Can you make an announcement to all oot-module maintainers, telling them > that they should put their packages together into linux-modules-extra > (for main) or a similar one for contrib, and if they're not doing it, > they will end up in an unsupported (no updates for point-releases, no > updates for kernel ABI bump updates) package. What does no answer mean? 'We need more time to think about it', 'Yes, we will do that', 'No, we will not do that', or 'Get lost, we don't care about that'? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383248: Suggestion about usplash-themes
Hi, I've to questions: 1. When will the next upload for usplash happen? upstream is at 0.4, where debian is still at 0.3. 2. Are you, David, interested in maintaining (or co-maintaining) a usplash-theme package? If so, I would be happy to help out/sponsor/$whatever and to contribute a derivated theme for debian-live. Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383248: Suggestion about usplash-themes
> That'd be great. I'm not a DD so I can't upload the theme package > myself, so it needs a maintainer, I'd just like to know that I'll be > able to commit fixes to it :) I'm not that in search for an additional package to maintain, so I'd suggest you maintain it, I'll sponsor and co-maintain it (this way I can do updates for the live-theme on my own, if needed). If you're happy with that, I'm too :) > As for debian-live customization, that should be really easy > considering how the package works Thanks for the explenation, I though it would work someway like this. Maybe you can even create both themes yourself? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441146: linux-modules-extra-2.6: please add virtualbox-ose-source
tags 441146 +pending thanks Torsten Werner wrote: > please add the vboxdrv module from package virtualbox-ose-source for > architectures amd64 and i386. on my todo as soon as the fixed vbox-ose 1.5 is uploaded. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441907: linux-modules-extra-2.6: vfsub.h:204: error: too few arguments to function 'vfs_symlink'
retitle 441907 linux-modules-extra-2.6: aufs doesn't build with vserver tags 441907 thanks Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Your package is failing to build with the following error: this has already been handled by excluding aufs from vserver flavours (see #441307). Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405232: include rt2400/rt2500/rt2570/rt2x00
What is the status of this, should/can I include the drivers into linux-modules-extra-2.6 now? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#447463: linux-modules-extra-2.6: FTBFS: tar: /usr/src/gspca-source.tar.bz2: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tags 447463 +pending thanks Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > tar -C debian/build/tmp -xjf /usr/src/gspca-source.tar.bz2 > tar: /usr/src/gspca-source.tar.bz2: Cannot open: No such file or directory see #446215, this was requested. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441146:
Michael Meskes wrote: > The bug is not fixed. the bug is fixed. > I don't care which piece of the software broke, thank you for letting me know. however, how about actually letting the *maintainer* of the package decide that? > the fact in the matter is that the virtualbox-ose module is not build by > linux-modules-extra. wrong. what matters is the reason why it is not build. #441146 is about including it into the conglomeration package and thus a bug in linux-modules-extra-2.6. the *new* issue is, unrelated to #441146, that virtualbox-ose modules do no longer build since 1.5.2, and thus a bug in virtualbox-ose-source. it is the task of the module-source maintainer to ship a working module-source package, not the conglomeration package maintainer; therefore cloning, reassigned and closed the approriate bug. extremely sophisticated way to kill peoples time. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441146:
Michael Meskes wrote: > Decide what? Which software is broken? Or whether this is a bug? to decide, if it is a bug in linux-modules-extra-2.6 or not. > Of course the reason matters, but the bug simply was about a binary > package not being available. no, read again. #441146 is about including some definition files into linux-modules-extra-2.6, not more, not less. as this was done, the bug is fixed. > IMO the only way to fix this is to deliver > the package. are you really not getting it? the /new/ problem is a problem in virtualbox-ose-source. it has absolutely nothing to do with linux-modules-extra-2.6. it can not be fixed in linux-modulex-extra-2.6. that is why it is not a bug in linux-modules-extra-2.6. > Fine with me. I don't mind having this bug reassigned. To be honest in > my opinion we should have two open bugs, one against > virtualbox-ose-source and one against linux-modules-extra-2.6 with the > latter one being blocked by the former. I still disagree with you guys > closing the bug though, though. no. the fact that virtualbox-ose-source does not comply with linux-modulex-extra-2.6 is a bug in virtualbox-ose-source, not in linux-modules-extra-2.6. > Just for the record we should note that this bug > had neither been reported against virtualbox-ose-source nor even > communicated with the package maintainers. theoretically, i communicated it to myself *scnr* :) -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#451116: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please add virtualbox-ose-guest-source and create virtualbox-ose-guest-modules
doesn't work. [...] /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.gen build-i386 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.real build MAJOR='2.6' MODULESOURCE='virtualbox-ose-guest-source' FLAVOUR='486' SUBARCH='none' UPSTREAMVERSION='2.6.22' MODULE='virtualbox-ose-guest' VERSION_SOURCE='2.6.22' VERSION='2.6.22' KERNEL_ARCH='i386' ABINAME='-3' LOCALVERSION='-486' ARCH='i386' VERSION_DEBIAN='7' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.22-3-486 M=/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_virtualbox-ose-guest make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.22-3-486' scripts/Makefile.build:17: /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_virtualbox-ose-guest/Makefile: No such file or directory make[4]: *** No rule to make target `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_virtualbox-ose-guest/Makefile'. Stop. make[3]: *** [_module_/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_virtualbox-ose-guest] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.22-3-486' make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_i386_none_486_virtualbox-ose-guest] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make[1]: *** [build-i386-none-486-virtualbox-ose-guest] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 (sid_i386)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-modules-extra-2.6$ -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387760: linux-modules-extra-2.6: adding linux-wlan-ng modules
Hi, are there still interests of adding linux-wlan-ng to linux-modules-extra-2.6? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#451116: New virtualbox-ose upload
Michael Meskes wrote: > Daniel, could you please build l-m-e again? not yet, waiting for 2.6.23-1. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sid package ipw3945-modules-2.6.23-1-686 ???
Kay Jarchow wrote: Are there plans to build ipw3945-modules-2.6.23-1-686? no, because as of 2.6.23, you can use iwlwifi. as soon as 2.6.23 has migrated to testing, I'll request the removal of ipw3945. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sid package ipw3945-modules-2.6.23-1-686 ???
Kay Jarchow wrote: Oh, thanks for the info. But, when will iwlwifi come to sid? There is only the firmware package. Or is this all I need? iwlwifi is part of 2.6.23 mainline, you don't need an extra module, just the firmware. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#461754: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please add loop-aes
Max Vozeler wrote: > The attached patch adds loop-aes modules - tested > with r10149 and 2.6.24-rc8. Hi, thanks for integrating loop-aes into l-m-e. Why do you override stuff in loop-aes/rules? Ideally, this shouldn't be needed and be done in the module-source itself (means, the Makefile of your loop-aes-source package). Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#461754: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please add loop-aes
Max Vozeler wrote: > I'm preparing a small kbuild-based source tree in the > setup target override because it is not possible to > get the loop-AES build system to work here (see below). Maybe it would make sense to move the original upstream makefile to something like Makefile.upstream and add a simple wrapper Makefile, so that the wrapper Makefile calls Makefile.upstream (and both lme and debian/rules call the Makefile wrapper only). Anyway, added as is, let's see if it can improved later. Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#462910: Please provide the udeb packages.
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote: > Please provide the udeb packages for debian-installer. d-i kernel modules are packaged seperately by d-i team. please specify your request. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#462910: Please provide the udeb packages.
reassign 462910 kernel-wedge
thanks
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> I think that atl2-modules is most important for d-i kernel to recognize
> the NIC of Atheros L2 chip.
> Please provide the udeb package of atl2-modules.
as said, d-i modules ("the udebs") are packaged seperately, thus
reassigning.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463006: linux-image-2.6.23-1-686: module iwl3945 fails
Johannes Rohr wrote: > Unfortunately, loading the new iwl3945 wlan driver does not work as > expected. have you installed firmware-iwlwifi? -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#462952: linux-modules-extra-2.6: please add tp-smapi
retitle 462952 Support for l-m-e-2.6 reassign 462952 tp-smapi-source thanks Hi, packag doesn't build with l-m-e-2.6, though I've added the necessary defines, means, once you've fixed your package, I'll enable it. ---snip--- dh_testdir /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.gen build_i386 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.real build MAJOR='2.6' MODULESOURCE='tp-smapi-source' FLAVOUR='486' KERNEL_ARCH='x86' UPSTREAMVERSION='2.6.24' MODULE='tp-smapi' FEATURESET='none' VERSION_SOURCE='2.6.24' VERSION='2.6.24' ABINAME='-1' LOCALVERSION='-486' ARCH='i386' VERSION_DEBIAN='1' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486 M=/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_tp-smapi make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_tp-smapi/Makefile:26: *** This driver requires kernel 2.6.19 or newer, and matching kernel sources. You may need to override KVER= or KSRC= or KBUILD= or MOD_DIR=/lib/modules//kernel. Stop. make[3]: *** [_module_/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_tp-smapi] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_i386_none_486_tp-smapi] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make[1]: *** [build_i386_none_486_tp-smapi] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 (sid_i386)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-modules-extra-2.6$ ---snap--- -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why aren't linux-latest packages updated yet in Sid?
Will Star wrote: > They still depend on linux-image-2.6.22-x which don't even exist in > Sid anymore. By simply updating this dependency you would make a lot > more people aware of availability of new kernels. This expands the > userbase of testers, which in turn causes bugs to be fixed more > swiftly, which is what we would all like, no? just yesterday evening, the last package of 2.6.24 left NEW and hit sid; can you please be a bit more patient? -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#451116: closed by Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Meskes wrote: > Please correct me if I'm wrong but I fail to see the > virtualbox-ose-guest packages on these lists. What am I missing? indeed; forgot to commit the enabling of it while testing it. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463594: squashfs-modules-2.6.24-1-686: kernel module is missing!
clone 463594 -1 reassign -1 squashfs-source retitle -1 Broken Makefiles wrt/ conglomeration thanks Daniel Blaschke wrote: > package only install an empty > /lib/modules/2.6.24-1-686/extra/squashfs/-directory, i.e. the kernel > module squashfs.ko is missing the cause is a bug in squashfs-source. Otavio, I do have a dejavue with #442906. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457603: Please, add r6040 module to linux-modules-extra-2.6
Hi, the package fails to build with l-m-e-2.6: ---snip--- [...] /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.gen build_i386 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.real build MAJOR='2.6' MODULESOURCE='r6040-source' FLAVOUR='486' KERNEL_ARCH='x86' UPSTREAMVERSION='2.6.24' MODULE='r6040' FEATURESET='none' VERSION_SOURCE='2.6.24' VERSION='2.6.24' ABINAME='-1' LOCALVERSION='-486' ARCH='i386' VERSION_DEBIAN='2' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24' /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486 M=/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040 make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' LD /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/built-in.o CC [M] /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.o /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c: In function 'mdio_write': /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c:236: warning: unused variable 'np' /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c: In function 'r6040_init_one': /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c:278: error: implicit declaration of function 'SET_MODULE_OWNER' /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c: In function 'r6040_open': /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c:381: error: 'SA_SHIRQ' undeclared (first use in this function) /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c:381: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c:381: error: for each function it appears in.) /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c:381: warning: passing argument 2 of 'request_irq' from incompatible pointer type /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c: In function 'r6040_GetSet_MACaddress': /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c:1041: warning: unused variable 'lp' /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.c:1056: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void make[4]: *** [/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040/r6040.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [_module_/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_r6040] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_i386_none_486_r6040] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24' make[1]: *** [build_i386_none_486_r6040] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24' make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 (sid_i386)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.24$ ---snap--- Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#464117: redhat-cluster: FTBFS with l-m-e-2.6
Package: redhat-cluster Severity: normal Hi, redhat-cluster fails to build with l-m-e-2.6, would be nice to have it back: ---snip--- /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.gen build_i386 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.real build MAJOR='2.6' MODULESOURCE='redhat-cluster-source' FLAVOUR='486' KERNEL_ARCH='x86' UPSTREAMVERSION='2.6.24' MODULE='redhat-cluster' FEATURESET='none' VERSION_SOURCE='2.6.24' VERSION='2.6.24' ABINAME='-1' LOCALVERSION='-486' ARCH='i386' VERSION_DEBIAN='2' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486 M=/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/Makefile:23: ../../../make/defines.mk: No such file or directory /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/Makefile:24: /make/clean.mk: No such file or directory /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/Makefile:25: /make/install.mk: No such file or directory /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs/Makefile:26: /make/uninstall.mk: No such file or directory make[5]: *** No rule to make target `/make/uninstall.mk'. Stop. make[4]: *** [/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster/gfs] Error 2 make[3]: *** [_module_/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make[1]: *** [build_i386_none_486_redhat-cluster] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 (sid_i386)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-modules-extra-2.6$ ---snap--- Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457603: Please, add r6040 module to linux-modules-extra-2.6
Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > New package is already uploaded. good. checking and enabling r6040 with the next upload tonight or tomorrow (waiting for some other things, and want to group them to ease NEW processing). -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#446222: please integrate the em8300 module
reassign 446222 em8300 thanks Hi, summing up: * em8300 builds now with m-a and 2.6.24-1 * l-m-c-2.6 has the meta files of em8300 * em8300 still with l-m-c-2.6 all you need to do is to fix the following error (from em8300 0.16.4-1): ---snip--- [...] /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.gen build_i386 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.real build MAJOR='2.6' MODULESOURCE='em8300-source' FLAVOUR='486' KERNEL_ARCH='x86' UPSTREAMVERSION='2.6.24' MODULE='em8300' FEATURESET='none' VERSION_SOURCE='2.6.24' VERSION='2.6.24' ABINAME='-1' LOCALVERSION='-486' ARCH='i386' VERSION_DEBIAN='2' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6' /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486 M=/home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300 make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' expr: non-numeric argument LD /home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300/built-in.o CC [M] /home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300/adv717x.o CC [M] /home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300/bt865.o /home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300/bt865.c: In function 'bt865_setup': /home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300/bt865.c:883: error: expected expression before '==' token /home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300/bt865.c:886: error: expected expression before '==' token make[4]: *** [/home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300/bt865.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [_module_/home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_em8300] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_i386_none_486_em8300] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6' make[1]: *** [build_i386_none_486_em8300] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6' make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 (sid_i386)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-modules-contrib-2.6$ ---snap--- For better undertanding what is happening: * l-m-c-2.6 unpacks em8300.tar.bz2 to a directory, and calls make the following way (BUILD_DIR is where the sources are unpacked to): $(MAKE) -C $(HEADERS_DIR) M=$(BUILD_DIR) similar, for installing the module, it calls: $(MAKE) -C $(HEADERS_DIR) M=$(BUILD_DIR) modules_install \ INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$(PACKAGE_DIR) INSTALL_MOD_DIR=contrib/$(MODULE) * your source package needs a top-level makefile which conforms to these two make calls. any extra variables, such as special compiler flags or configuration flags need to be present in that very makefile. * to avoid duplication, it is recommended to also make use of the top-level makefile in your debian/rules, by just calling it there. * a sample package to look at is btrfs and aufs. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#469338: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1
tags 469338 +pending thanks José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote: > Tested with amd64, 486 & 686 kernel versions. Whenever I try to use > unionfs module I always get the > "unionfs: Unknown symbol release_open_intent" message, so the package is > useless on any arch. this is know and was announced, i've added a patch to linux-2.6 trunk to add that missing symbol. once the next linux-2.6 upload happens, this will be fixed. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
Bug#471461: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please add sfc modules
Hi Ben, sfc currently doesn't work, here is the build-log. Nevertheless, I've added the meta files for sfc in lme, but did not enable it yet. As soon as you've uploaded a fixed version of sfc to unstable, I'll enable it. Let me know if you need help test-building it. Regards, Daniel ---snip--- [...] make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.real build MAJOR='2.6' MODULESOURCE='sfc-source' FLAVOUR='486' KERNEL_ARCH='x86' UPSTREAMVERSION='2.6.24' MODULE='sfc' FEATURESET='none' VERSION_SOURCE='2.6.24' VERSION='2.6.24' ABINAME='-1' LOCALVERSION='-486' ARCH='i386' VERSION_DEBIAN='6' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486 M=/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_sfc make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' LD /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_sfc/built-in.o CC [M] /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_sfc/efx.o In file included from /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_sfc/net_driver.h:52, from /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_sfc/efx.c:40: /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_sfc/kernel_compat.h:41:26: error: extraversion.h: No such file or directory make[4]: *** [/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_sfc/efx.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [_module_/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_none_486_sfc] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-486' make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_i386_none_486_sfc] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make[1]: *** [build_i386_none_486_sfc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 ---snap--- -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#470196: linux-modules-extra-2.6: add et131x modules
Hi, I've added et131x to lme, but skipping it for xen featureset as it doesn't build: ---snip--- [...] make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.real build MAJOR='2.6' MODULESOURCE='et131x-source' FLAVOUR='686' KERNEL_ARCH='x86' UPSTREAMVERSION='2.6.24' MODULE='et131x' FEATURESET='xen' VERSION_SOURCE='2.6.24' VERSION='2.6.24' ABINAME='-1' LOCALVERSION='-xen-686' ARCH='i386' VERSION_DEBIAN='6' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-xen-686 M=/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_xen_686_et131x make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-xen-686' LD /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_xen_686_et131x/built-in.o CC [M] /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_xen_686_et131x/et131x_main.o CC [M] /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_xen_686_et131x/et131x_initpci.o /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_xen_686_et131x/et131x_initpci.c: In function 'et131x_pci_setup': /home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_xen_686_et131x/et131x_initpci.c:1375: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_set_consistent_dma_mask' make[4]: *** [/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_xen_686_et131x/et131x_initpci.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [_module_/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_i386_xen_686_et131x] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-xen-686' make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_i386_xen_686_et131x] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make[1]: *** [build_i386_xen_686_et131x] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/linux-modules-extra-2.6' make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 (sid_i386)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-modules-extra-2.6$ ---snap--- Please let me know as soon as you have uploaded a fixed version to unstable, so that I can enable it on xen too. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian kernel version for lenny?
Ola Lundqvist wrote: > What is linux-module-extra? I have not heard about it before. conglomeration package for oot module packages, see http://blog.daniel-baumann.ch/2006/12/10#20061210_kernel-modules-packaging -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#475131: Please add AMD64 for virtualbox-ose-source and virtualbox-ose-guest-source
Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: > They are supported on i386. compilation failed when the last upload of lme happened, so most likely no other attempt before 2.6.25. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#475295: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: firewire doesn't work on ipod and camcorder
severity 475295 normal forcemerge 475295 449272 thanks Alec Robertson wrote: > New firewire in 2.6.22 and 2.6.24 does not work properly with older > firewire ipods (hangs after a few data transfers and requires an eject > of the pcmcia firewire card). It doesn't work at all with camcorders > that require the /dev/raw1394 device. According to the ieee1394 site, > the old stack should be used instead. Why was debian migrated to a new > stack when it doesn't work? Will this be reversed in a kernel update? known; please look at the other bug reports for the same issue. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#464197: enable cs46xx for etchnahalf?
Mikko Rapeli wrote: > Feel free to sponsor, adopt, hijack, NMU, fix or redo the package, if it helps > getting cs46xx audio driver back. Thanks for your work, I'll check to integrate that firmware into firmware-nonfree tomorrow. There should really, really not be any firmware (source) packages out there anymore but the kernel teams firmware package(s). Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#464197: enable cs46xx for etchnahalf?
dann frazier wrote: > Sorry if I'm missing something, but in this case I don't think we can > legally include it in non-free since there is no license and > therefore no permission to redistribute :( yep, as stated on my answer here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/04/msg00141.html -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
