Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Dominik George
Hi,

>> I've scheduled a session for that at our organisation's meeting this
>weekend.
>
>Any outcome of this session?

Yes, to some extent.

We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They seem to 
reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I don't know yet. I also 
do not know yet whether this is a GTK/Qt bug or an x11rdp bug. We see the same 
issue with Qt5 and VNC, but VNC over xrdp does seem to work.

Being back from illness and a Teckids camp, more details will follow tonight.

-nik
-- 
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296

Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918

Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland
Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor

LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)



Re: Bug#783087: debian-edu-config: dhclient exit hook hostname script fails to update LTSP server hostname

2016-06-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Wolfgang,

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:54:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> LTSP servers have PROFILE="Workstation, Thin-Client-Server" set in 
> /etc/debian-edu/config after a default installation.
 
what's the effect of this? Do we need to fix this in jessie?


-- 
cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#783087: debian-edu-config: dhclient exit hook hostname script fails to update LTSP server hostname

2016-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:35:44AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:54:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> > LTSP servers have PROFILE="Workstation, Thin-Client-Server" set in 
> > /etc/debian-edu/config after a default installation.
>  
> what's the effect of this? Do we need to fix this in jessie?
 
It's only used if someone sets up one or several LTSP server(s) (besides 
a combi server). People doing that will be skilled enough to find the 
workaround and the patch in the BTS. It's simply nice to have this 
patched version in stretch but imo no need to get it into jessie.

Wolfgang


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> 
> We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They seem to 
> reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I don't know yet. I 
> also do not know yet whether this is a GTK/Qt bug or an x11rdp bug. We see 
> the same issue with Qt5 and VNC, but VNC over xrdp does seem to work.

Sounds tricky.
 
> Being back from illness and a Teckids camp, more details will follow tonight.

Thanks for your effort into this.

Kind regards

  Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Mike Gabriel

Hi Dominik, Andreas,

On  Mi 01 Jun 2016 11:15:36 CEST, Andreas Tille wrote:


On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:


We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They  
seem to reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I  
don't know yet. I also do not know yet whether this is a GTK/Qt bug  
or an x11rdp bug. We see the same issue with Qt5 and VNC, but VNC  
over xrdp does seem to work.


Sounds tricky.

Being back from illness and a Teckids camp, more details will  
follow tonight.


Thanks for your effort into this.

Kind regards

  Andreas.


GTK3 and Qt5 are tricky in remote environments, anyway. It is mostly  
because of upstream devs not being aware enough of remote desktop  
technologies.


Personally, I think, we should / you should upload xrdp as is now to  
Debian unstable (not experimental, really unstable) and open the space  
for more testers inside Debian.


The issue should be reported as a bug immediately referencing this ITA  
bug for backlog reference.


my 2¢
Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/mailxchange/kronolith/fb.php?u=m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de


pgpegAmyVYufZ.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur


Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Dominik George
Hi,

> GTK3 and Qt5 are tricky in remote environments, anyway. It is mostly
> because of upstream devs not being aware enough of remote desktop
> technologies.
> 
> Personally, I think, we should / you should upload xrdp as is now to
> Debian unstable (not experimental, really unstable) and open the space
> for more testers inside Debian.
> 
> The issue should be reported as a bug immediately referencing this ITA
> bug for backlog reference.

While I do agree with you, please give us a few more days (three, let's say) 
to find a workaround. I have something schemed, but need to find out whether 
it is too ugly to share or not ;).

-nik

-- 
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17  FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296

Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918

Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland
Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor

LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#783087: debian-edu-config: dhclient exit hook hostname script fails to update LTSP server hostname

2016-06-01 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:16:50AM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> It's only used if someone sets up one or several LTSP server(s) (besides 
> a combi server). People doing that will be skilled enough to find the 
> workaround and the patch in the BTS. It's simply nice to have this 
> patched version in stretch but imo no need to get it into jessie.

I agree it's not critical for our Jessie release to have this fixed, but
I think it would be nice if we could get this fixed in Jessie 8.6…


-- 
cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Bug#783087 marked as pending

2016-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 783087 pending
Bug #783087 [debian-edu-config] debian-edu-config: dhclient exit hook hostname 
script fails to update LTSP server hostname
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #783087 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
783087: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783087
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Re: make gosa packages php7 compliant

2016-06-01 Thread Mike Gabriel

Hi Wolfgang,

On  Sa 14 Mai 2016 22:00:12 CEST, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:


Please test.


I have just uploaded gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 to unstable. That new  
upload contains two new patches (1025, 1026).


1025 -> fix when running under smarty 3.1.29-1 from experimental
1026 -> replace all deprecated-style constructor methods

@Wolfgang: can you please confirm that gosa works with smarty 3.1.29-1  
after the fix via patch 1025? I would love to push 3.1.29-2 into  
unstable.


Thanks
Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/mailxchange/kronolith/fb.php?u=m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de


pgpFuhmWvGdHO.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur


Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Mike Gabriel

On  Mi 01 Jun 2016 11:31:49 CEST, Dominik George wrote:


Hi,


GTK3 and Qt5 are tricky in remote environments, anyway. It is mostly
because of upstream devs not being aware enough of remote desktop
technologies.

Personally, I think, we should / you should upload xrdp as is now to
Debian unstable (not experimental, really unstable) and open the space
for more testers inside Debian.

The issue should be reported as a bug immediately referencing this ITA
bug for backlog reference.


While I do agree with you, please give us a few more days (three, let's say)
to find a workaround. I have something schemed, but need to find out whether
it is too ugly to share or not ;).

-nik


Ack.

Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/mailxchange/kronolith/fb.php?u=m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de


pgpixDpU46dwT.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur


Re: make gosa packages php7 compliant

2016-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:00:28AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I have just uploaded gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 to unstable. That new 
> upload contains two new patches (1025, 1026).
> 
> 1025 -> fix when running under smarty 3.1.29-1 from experimental
> 1026 -> replace all deprecated-style constructor methods
> 
> @Wolfgang: can you please confirm that gosa works with smarty 3.1.29-1 
> after the fix via patch 1025? I would love to push 3.1.29-2 into 
> unstable.
 
Will do so as soon as gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 shows up on the mirrors.

Wolfgang


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#783087: debian-edu-config: dhclient exit hook hostname script fails to update LTSP server hostname

2016-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:39:06AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:16:50AM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> > It's simply nice to have this patched version in stretch but imo no 
> > need to get it into jessie.
> 
> I agree it's not critical for our Jessie release to have this fixed, 
> but I think it would be nice if we could get this fixed in Jessie 8.6…
 
Yes, I was still hoping that you could manage to get the printing fix 
somehow into 8.5...

Wolfgang


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#783087: debian-edu-config: dhclient exit hook hostname script fails to update LTSP server hostname

2016-06-01 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:17:55PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> Yes, I was still hoping that you could manage to get the printing fix 
> somehow into 8.5...

8.5 is basically frozen now, and already has seen this pre-announce:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-stable-announce/2016/05/msg1.html

I also think the printing fix is easy enough to (communicate+)do manually,
that I don't think we should delay the release by another two months,
pushing it after the summer holidays…


-- 
cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#783087: debian-edu-config: dhclient exit hook hostname script fails to update LTSP server hostname

2016-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:38:23PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I also think the printing fix is easy enough to (communicate+)do manually,
> that I don't think we should delay the release by another two months,
> pushing it after the summer holidays…
 
Yes. The release notes should include (or point to) a hint about 
printing...

Wolfgang


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: make gosa packages php7 compliant

2016-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:13:45PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:00:28AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > I have just uploaded gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 to unstable. That new 
> > upload contains two new patches (1025, 1026).
> > 
> > 1025 -> fix when running under smarty 3.1.29-1 from experimental
> > 1026 -> replace all deprecated-style constructor methods
> > 
> > @Wolfgang: can you please confirm that gosa works with smarty 3.1.29-1 
> > after the fix via patch 1025? I would love to push 3.1.29-2 into 
> > unstable.
>  
> Will do so as soon as gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 shows up on the mirrors.
 
With smarty3 from experimental and gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 from unstable 
only a blank index page is shown after logging in (both firefox-esr and 
chromium). Going back to smarty 3.1.21: same blank page.

I suppose gosa to be responsible but don't have time atm to dig into it 
further. 

Wolfgang


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Dominik George
Hi,

> > While I do agree with you, please give us a few more days (three, let's
> > say) to find a workaround. I have something schemed, but need to find out
> > whether it is too ugly to share or not ;).
> > 

Something new:

Upstream actually seems to have a patch that fixes this issue.

We tried to avoid updateing to a new upstream commit as the one in use was 
well-tested, but looking through the changes, there has been a big diff, but 
almost all of it seems to be fixing warnings and code formatting.

So right now, we'd prefer to just move to the most recent upstream commit 
(after testing, of course).

-nik

-- 
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17  FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296

Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918

Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland
Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor

LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> We tried to avoid updateing to a new upstream commit as the one in use was 
> well-tested, but looking through the changes, there has been a big diff, but 
> almost all of it seems to be fixing warnings and code formatting.
> 
> So right now, we'd prefer to just move to the most recent upstream commit 
> (after testing, of course).

Sounds pretty sensible - please go for it.

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi

On Wed Jun 1 20:23:15 2016 GMT+0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > We tried to avoid updateing to a new upstream commit as the one in use was 
> > well-tested, but looking through the changes, there has been a big diff, 
> > but 
> > almost all of it seems to be fixing warnings and code formatting.
> > 
> > So right now, we'd prefer to just move to the most recent upstream commit 
> > (after testing, of course).
> 
> Sounds pretty sensible - please go for it.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Andreas.

/me nods from here, too.

-- 
Sent from my Jolla

Re: make gosa packages php7 compliant

2016-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:13:45PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:00:28AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > > I have just uploaded gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 to unstable. That new 
> > > upload contains two new patches (1025, 1026).
> > > 
> > > 1025 -> fix when running under smarty 3.1.29-1 from experimental
> > > 1026 -> replace all deprecated-style constructor methods
> > > 
> > > @Wolfgang: can you please confirm that gosa works with smarty 3.1.29-1 
> > > after the fix via patch 1025? I would love to push 3.1.29-2 into 
> > > unstable.
> >  
> > Will do so as soon as gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 shows up on the mirrors.
>  
> With smarty3 from experimental and gosa 2.7.4+reloaded2-11 from unstable 
> only a blank index page is shown after logging in (both firefox-esr and 
> chromium).

After running 'a2enmod php7.0' the blank page showed an error message.

This fix worked for me (in /usr/share/gosa/include/)

--- a/class_acl.inc 2016-06-01 23:20:58.314147422 +0200
+++ b/class_acl.inc 2016-06-01 23:21:21.397742892 +0200
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
 var $roleList = NULL;
 var $aclMemberList = NULL;
 
-function __construct(&$config, $parent, $dn= NULL)
+function construct(&$config, $parent, $dn= NULL)
 {
 /* Include config object */
 plugin::plugin($config, $dn);

The gui looks ok, but there are lots of other fatal error messages about 
missing function/method each time an action is tried on the gui.

Same with smarty 3.1.21 btw, so I guess gosa is to blame.

Wolfgang


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Dominik George
Hi,

newest version is in collab-maint, issues seem to be resolved.

Please test, and, if satisfied, feel free to upload ;).

Cheers,
Nik

-- 
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17  FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296

Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918

Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland
Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor

LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Dominik George
Hi,

one more question:

Is the „Closes:“ line in changelog syntactically correct to close all the bugs?

-nik
-- 
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296

Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918

Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland
Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor

LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)



Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dominik,

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:18AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> newest version is in collab-maint, issues seem to be resolved.
> 
> Please test, and, if satisfied, feel free to upload ;).

Very good.  Unfortunately I can not test before next Monday.  Mike
if you can run a test and upload this would be great.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

2016-06-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Without checking: After Building you get a *.changes file.  Open this
and check whether it has a Closes: line featuring all the bugs you want
to close.
Sorry for my brewity
Andreas.

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:26:30AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> one more question:
> 
> Is the „Closes:“ line in changelog syntactically correct to close all the 
> bugs?
> 
> -nik
> -- 
> PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
> 
> Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
> 
> Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
> Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland
> Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor
> 
> LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de