On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Arvind S Raj wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:54:49PM +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
>> > El mar, 01-03-2011 a las 15:56 +0100, Holger Levsen escribió:
>> > > each time I see "openteacher" I'm thinking I wouldn't like a very
>> simple and
>> > > limited tool being called like I am. I'm not a teacher, but I think
>> the name
>> > > is unfortunate.
>> > >
>> > > maybe it's just me...
>> >
>> > Not only you, I've thought exactly the same the first time I saw the
>> > RFS.
>>
>
> What's the issue with the name?
>
>
>>
>> So is there anyone (=any teacher) who volunteers to contact upstream
>> (possibly proxied through the maintainer who RFSed the package) about
>> this?
>
>
> I'm quite new to the whole process so if someone could just point me in the
> right direction(if there is a formal method of submitting an RFP) and
> explain to me what's the issue.
>
Could someone point me in the right direction on what exactly is the issue
and how can I resolve it?
--
Arvind S Raj
