On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Arvind S Raj <sraj.arv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:54:49PM +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote: >> > El mar, 01-03-2011 a las 15:56 +0100, Holger Levsen escribió: >> > > each time I see "openteacher" I'm thinking I wouldn't like a very >> simple and >> > > limited tool being called like I am. I'm not a teacher, but I think >> the name >> > > is unfortunate. >> > > >> > > maybe it's just me... >> > >> > Not only you, I've thought exactly the same the first time I saw the >> > RFS. >> > > What's the issue with the name? > > >> >> So is there anyone (=any teacher) who volunteers to contact upstream >> (possibly proxied through the maintainer who RFSed the package) about >> this? > > > I'm quite new to the whole process so if someone could just point me in the > right direction(if there is a formal method of submitting an RFP) and > explain to me what's the issue. > Could someone point me in the right direction on what exactly is the issue and how can I resolve it? -- Arvind S Raj
