Processed: housekeeping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 233283 Bug#233283: Please dpkg-reconfigure to dpkg man page see also section Bug#233282: Please dpkg-reconfigure to dpkg man page see also section Disconnected #233283 from all other report(s). > close 233283 Bug#233283: Please dpkg-reconfigure to dpkg man page see also section 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Daniel Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > severity 233282 minor Bug#233282: Please dpkg-reconfigure to dpkg man page see also section Severity set to `minor'. > retitle 233282 [DOC] Please mention dpkg-reconfigure(8) on dpkg(8) Bug#233282: Please dpkg-reconfigure to dpkg man page see also section Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
are packages with diversions not downgradeable?
[I am not subscribed to debian-dpkg; please reply to -devel as well.]
Here's a transcript of me testing xft 2.1.2-6, which gets rid of some
diversions.
As you can see, I ran into some problems when upgrading libxft-dev
2.1.2-5 (which used dpkg-divert) to libxft-dev 2.1.2-6 (which removes
them), then downgrading to 2.1.2-5 and trying to re-upgrade to 2.1.2-6.
Am I using diversions wrong? Is this a bug in dpkg-divert?
redwald:/home/branden/packages/CHROOTS# chroot sid-upgrade/
redwald:/# cd
redwald:~# dselect update
Hit http://archive.progeny.com sid/main Packages
Hit http://archive.progeny.com sid/main Release
Hit http://archive.progeny.com sid/main Sources
Hit http://archive.progeny.com sid/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Merging Available information
Replacing available packages info, using /var/cache/apt/available.
Information about 13219 package(s) was updated.
redwald:~# ls
libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb libxft2-dbg_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
libxft2_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
redwald:~# ls -l /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/
ls: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/: No such file or directory
redwald:~# dpkg -S Xft
dpkg: *Xft* not found.
redwald:~# dpkg-divert --list
redwald:~# apt-get install libxft{2,2-dbg,-dev}
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libxft-dev libxft2 libxft2-dbg
0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/471kB of archives.
After unpacking 1192kB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package libxft2.
(Reading database ... 12638 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libxft2 (from .../libxft2_2.1.2-5_powerpc.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libxft-dev.
Unpacking libxft-dev (from .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-5_powerpc.deb) ...
Adding `diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev'
Adding `diversion of /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.a by
libxft-dev'
Adding `diversion of /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.so by
libxft-dev'
Selecting previously deselected package libxft2-dbg.
Unpacking libxft2-dbg (from .../libxft2-dbg_2.1.2-5_powerpc.deb) ...
Setting up libxft2 (2.1.2-5) ...
Setting up libxft-dev (2.1.2-5) ...
Setting up libxft2-dbg (2.1.2-5) ...
redwald:~# ls -l /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/
total 24
-rw-r--r--1 root root12774 Nov 17 08:13 Xft.h
-rw-r--r--1 root root 5385 Nov 17 08:13 XftCompat.h
redwald:~# dpkg -S Xft
diversion by libxft-dev from: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h
diversion by libxft-dev to: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h
libxft-dev: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h
libxft-dev: /usr/lib/libXft.a
libxft2: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2
diversion by libxft-dev from: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so
diversion by libxft-dev to: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.so
libxft2-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/libXft.so.2
libxft-dev: /usr/lib/libXft.la
libxft-dev: /usr/lib/libXft.so
libxft-dev: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/XftCompat.h
libxft2: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2.1.1
libxft-dev: /usr/share/man/man3/Xft.3.gz
libxft2-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/libXft.so.2.1.1
diversion by libxft-dev from: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so
diversion by libxft-dev to: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.so
libxft-dev: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft
diversion by libxft-dev from: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a
diversion by libxft-dev to: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.a
diversion by libxft-dev from: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a
diversion by libxft-dev to: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.a
diversion by libxft-dev from: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h
diversion by libxft-dev to: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h
redwald:~# dpkg-divert --list
diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev
diversion of /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.a by libxft-dev
diversion of /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.so by libxft-dev
redwald:~# ls
libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb libxft2-dbg_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
libxft2_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
redwald:~# dpkg -iO *.deb
(Reading database ... 12671 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.2-5 (using libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb)
...
diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev
Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev'
diversion of /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.a by libxft-dev
Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.a by
libxft-dev'
diversion of /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.so by libxft-dev
Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft1.so by
libxft-dev'
Unpacking replacement libxft-dev ...
Preparing to replace libxft2-dbg 2.1.2-5 (using
libxft2-dbg_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libxft2-dbg ...
Preparing to replace libxft2 2.1.2-5 (using libxft2_2.1.2
Spam mail warning notification! (Attachment Removal)
eManager Notification * The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: Destination mailbox(es): <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Policy: Attachment Removal Attachment file name: all_document.pif - application/octet-stream Action: Replaced with text eManager has removed a sensitive attachment file in the email. *** End of message * Received: (qmail 29400 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2004 08:03:57 - Received: from cp160828-a.tilbu1.nb.home.nl (HELO telekurs.de) (217.120.55.17) by mailgw2.telekurs.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2004 08:03:57 - From: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Approved Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:03:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0014_16FF.33DC" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Bug#237245: marked as done (install-info: breaks maintainer scripts at least of tar and xemacs21-support)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:27:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#237245: install-info: breaks maintainer scripts at least of tar and xemacs21-support has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2004 15:08:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 10 07:08:36 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from balu1.urz.unibas.ch [131.152.1.51] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B15Jz-8t-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:08:35 -0800 Received: from alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch (bioz6-allgem17.Bioz.unibas.ch [131.152.17.45]) by balu1.urz.unibas.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AF83aS004787; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:08:04 +0100 Received: from frank by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B14pt-0005kd-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:37:29 +0100 From: "Frank Küster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: install-info: breaks maintainer scripts at least of tar and xemacs21-support X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:37:29 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 X-Spam-Level: Package: dpkg Version: 1.10.19 Severity: grave Justification: breaks installation of other packages, of which tar is essential The install-info program seems to have changed its syntax incompatibly. This morning, I got an error from tar's postinst, later also from xemacs21-support's postinst and prerm. This is the error message for tar: Unpacking replacement tar ... Setting up tar (1.13.93-2) ... install-info: No such file or directory for General Commands dpkg: error processing tar (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: tar E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) alhambra:~# xemacs21-support gives the same message in postinst, in prerm it is: Removing xemacs21-support ... install-info: No dir file specified; try --help for more information. The command line in tar's postinst is: install-info --quiet --section "General Commands" "General Commands" \ /usr/share/info/tar.info.gz Issued manuall by root, it gives the same error, even without --quiet. It hasn't changed since woody, so I doubt the error is in tar. Commenting out these lines helped (dpkg --configure -a was successful after that), but that can't be a general solution. Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii dselect 1.10.19 a user tool to manage Debian packa ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0-bunk-2 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux alhambra 2.4.25 #1 Mit Feb 18 16:41:07 CET 2004 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses55.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-11woody1 The GNU stdc++ library --- Received: (at 237245-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 09:38:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 01:38:39 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from balu1.urz.unibas.ch [131.152.1.51] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B1MeC-0004ez-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 01:38:38 -0800 Received: from alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch (bioz6-allgem17.bioz.unibas.ch [131.152.17.45]) by balu1.urz.unibas.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2B9c3aS020779; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:38:04 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch) by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B1MTQ-nw-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:27:28
Processing of dpkg_1.10.20_i386.changes
dpkg_1.10.20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dpkg_1.10.20.dsc dpkg_1.10.20.tar.gz dpkg_1.10.20_i386.deb dselect_1.10.20_i386.deb dpkg-dev_1.10.20_all.deb dpkg-doc_1.10.20_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
dpkg_1.10.20_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: dpkg-dev_1.10.20_all.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.10.20_all.deb dpkg-doc_1.10.20_all.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-doc_1.10.20_all.deb dpkg_1.10.20.dsc to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.10.20.dsc dpkg_1.10.20.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.10.20.tar.gz dpkg_1.10.20_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.10.20_i386.deb dselect_1.10.20_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.10.20_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 192102 218713 224616 230750 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#224616: marked as done (dpkg: more update Japanese manpages for dpkg-1.10.18)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:47:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#224616: fixed in dpkg 1.10.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2003 17:30:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 20 11:30:57 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mibai.ryukyu.ne.jp (ryukyu.ne.jp) [202.238.192.18] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AXklX-00072T-00; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:19:48 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus.ryukyu.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A548374056 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 02:19:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from ryukyu.ne.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mb.ryukyu.ne.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01374-06 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 02:19:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (202-238-200-051.ryukyu.ne.jp [202.238.200.51]) by ryukyu.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905FE377DB1 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 02:19:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 02:19:43 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dpkg: more update Japanese manpages for dpkg-1.10.18 From: KISE Hiroshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="--Next_Part(Sun_Dec_21_02_19_43_2003_928)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ryukyu.ne.jp Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 X-Spam-Level: Next_Part(Sun_Dec_21_02_19_43_2003_928)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: dpkg Version: 1.10.18 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Newly/updated translated Japanese manpages for current version of dpkg is available. Please commit to CVS. See also Bug#220776 . man/ja/dpkg-architecture.1 --- new man/ja/dpkg-query.8--- new man/ja/dselect.8 --- update Next_Part(Sun_Dec_21_02_19_43_2003_928)-- Content-Type: Application/Octet-Stream Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="manpages-ja.tar.bz2" QlpoOTFBWSZTWRZ/8JgAOFr/3//zAEB/7/8CAD///2BUf3z3OnrL Ee7vvpc9dT50cHWfJB8qFCugNAW2VAA03bjL5s5d94HnuQw7nrxvYTw3J61qiqBjbY4723ZM9ZQW t6yRKASuxvr27atanOu5jol3dzbS9YiAvtqLzYR6yihVsb7GqCiolJVOhgpKNnT1N6QdVTnLjcMN t9jVJ83nZ3fF449avuRQPpp9AAAB7J3AFPttcvng9ezbIedCudu1tu57d1Ut7nesu2vcdynRrA7j YWwSIhppE0EwgAABGg0aJhpMCNDIaZNKemRkxTTQbQqbZKAbKaehDynoTQwmgMR6mBABiMQ9QejR BqegmQQgSek0ZCJmlG9ITeqDaT1NMT1NPUMQBpoAaAAaaAADQAABoANA0AGgNAAAaZBE0KaNBJqf pR+qH6o0aANGjQAyGQaBkGgaaAAAB6mgAAA0ABJpJCEBAIyaAhqYp6T9Enqb0KemaoM1 PTU9TyhpkyaGgNAAAMgBEoiaQDRlU3k1PEnqehNJ+p6nqT2k0ZHqntJPKbU9TRka PQhk08U0yGg0aAAAGhkHqGgPUDQaADQ0Gg0AEiIgJoAQAQyAmmmjQI1T2TTJkaNNT9VPaaCaZNJ5 Q8mo9IAMQAADQAAHlAAGgAADTDyrp7h2F/8oqwkOwQlTudyBdxdvu07tXaLiD3nD/MGUANMvVWRJ BSsV7nmWpg5ZXudPvederDn8bGs5tKHdSycTgj1iRRIXiYINp6vMpZBkdK+XeBtUQUE/t2vJkM3S u23W3FHuvxQHPGUfefBTM/Wr033annTGnD8Pb+AgWftLEz9xZma/JxbCtB56Vo91vxQL7fn2dNv0 /lSlLX2/M/t/jjyM+wM4s5wzw2ngrvl8CzazvstZXKwEG4rZ9DyN2dxYPn2rf1LFOWjZJVeL8Tmj udQXUf4j9CNvqYpDAYauxj4/+3+lw4y9s47dxTEV/oqGZf9Ou39WUK7v87gz+y99x+hTCNIFSifn 41HzU1b8yqYC2Bl4JB9s5D9lRzw7nf+9WnCj3NNR3O9Za00+iBHygzfr+BkFabh6Iv1+fy4+D1XE ehGtVGKoh7h69NFZiXClFKszOEFvBE/mDSbmfaA/ywys38ARKwjiQUtKo2SpQ/oNGA6y19eR5hvF UfA1frDi8cUOjRwd3Lm4sDG8mMJh74hrTEUr5ZclObOX2VaqZOcbypRnq6UEGaha4kfAXUVg6te1 BELyykNQglIzgYvAIZoG8+GYN+69PKTnhOMtGskziudYOM+Hl8TaKm6pvXmN+iRU/eOOPlpv6bpI t4O4vks410R6dHOnu+kc615ck2BDX12fv79y0iyE8BG6ugz30myMhOrKcYUKDi0B1nJC2eNCOiUD 52w0por3049C52gX0DzmxGIRtYjahZK0uV0JOBYInPGKB/7/J2P9vb5N3x6n8H8NrVnc/e/qX/u9 qrTTi1r+YRfmaalOkKkN3RZBd+Bl8prFHz87NZhUqXFTuoKTBX4+Gvk+5JMJ/Leq8O797WEFyYUG sP5XnidlvzsOkUA7x/mKcaa8TpoviToc6lep7uyxTya01vkaHh2c/nHF3wUnXQ19bd1o23c0Szp7 vgPDaVtiHcS5YET859+Zkl0+fZFhSW1JX1tV94yVTyQD8Gzb9zsfK15Ns5kOmev13owPZ8NdQ3m3 0XRt8SfSTHSPO1kxdrDPd1MjBnCc+J8Hq8ue9xCEOxcv2wt2MhEHilOu/OsICHC6NI4PPhCCbbOP a9d2wZ8d4wqzinE5010bpREbumQTKV9seM1gMvZ8bDWtUWxhzpdd+devvNjd5JyKjh52r8JoekWp F4IKueN4DmRfleXSErcCPYnKaty
Bug#218713: marked as done (dpkg: [INTL:fr] updated french manpages)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:47:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218713: fixed in dpkg 1.10.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2003 08:48:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 02 02:48:22 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AGDuH-0003RE-00; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 02:48:21 -0600 Received: from clalis.pclnet (bordeaux-1-a7-62-147-87-143.dial.proxad.net [62.147.87.143]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30A4786FD for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 09:48:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by clalis.pclnet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 32F59B2CA; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 09:49:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 09:49:22 +0100 From: Philippe Batailler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: dpkg: [INTL:fr] updated french manpages Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF, UNDESIRED_LANGUAGE_BODY autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: dpkg Version: 1.10.18 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, I have attached to this mail updated translation of the following french manpages in cvs dpkg/man/fr: deb-control.5.diff dpkg-scanpackages.8.diff update-alternatives.8.diff dpkg.8.diff dpkg-source.1.diff dpkg-query.8.diff start-stop-daemon.8.diff Please, commit them. Thank you very much. -- Philippe Batailler --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dpkg.8.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- /home/phil/CVS-DEBIAN/dpkg/man/fr/dpkg.82002-05-31 21:49:12.0 +0200 +++ dpkg.8 2003-11-01 22:31:10.0 +0100 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -.\" traduction de la révision CVS 1.32 -.TH DPKG 8 "April 12, 1998" "Debian Project" "dpkg suite" +.\" traduction de la révision CVS 1.33 +.TH DPKG 8 "February 2000" "Debian Project" "dpkg suite" .SH NOM dpkg \- un gestionnaire de paquet de niveau intermédiaire pour Debian .SH SYNOPSIS @@ -10,26 +10,24 @@ Ce manuel est destiné aux utilisateurs qui souhaitent aller au delà de la commande \fBdpkg --help\fP pour la compréhension des options de la ligne de commande et des états des paquets. - +.PP Les responsables de paquet qui veulent comprendre comment \fBdpkg\fP -installe leur paquet \fIne doivent pas\fP l'utiliser. Les descriptions de -\fBdpkg\fP concernant l'installation ou la désinstallation des paquets -sont très insuffisantes. Dans le système « GNU Info » vous trouverez, sous -la rubrique \fIPackage Management System\fP de la \fIdebian-faq\fP, des -renseignements plus détaillés à ce sujet. Voyez aussi la rubrique -\fIDebian Package Management Tools\fP pour des renseignements sur la -création de paquets Debian. +installe leur paquet \fIne doivent pas\fP l'utiliser. Les descriptions +concernant l'installation ou la désinstallation des paquets +sont très insuffisantes. +.PP +Vous trouverez des renseignements sur ce sujet dans la Faq Debian ou dans +la référence Debian, aux rubriques concernant la création de paquets. .SH DESCRIPTION \fBdpkg\fP est un outil de niveau intermédiaire pour l'installation, la création, la suppression et la gestion des paquets Debian. -\fBDselect\fP(8) est la principale interface à \fBdpkg\fP et la plus -agréable pour l'utilisateur. \fBdpkg\fP lui-même est entièrement contrôlé par +\fBdpkg\fP lui-même est entièrement contrôlé par des paramètres sur la ligne de commande, laquelle comprend exactement une action et zéro ou plusieurs options. Le paramètre « action » dit ce que \fBdpkg\fP doit faire et les options modifient l'action d'une manière ou d'une autre. - +.PP On peut aussi utiliser \fBdpkg\fP comme une interface à \fBdpkg-deb\fP. Quand \fBdpkg\fP rencontre les actions suivantes, qui sont des actions de \fBdpkg-deb\f
Bug#192102: marked as done ([INTL:pt] dselect: cosmetic problem, item 3 on pt_BR)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:47:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#192102: fixed in dpkg 1.10.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2003 03:55:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 05 22:55:53 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from p57.sa01.plt.procergs.com.br (hemp) [200.198.163.121] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19CtYW-00075l-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 22:55:53 -0500 Received: from rodrigo by hemp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19CtYS-If-00; Tue, 06 May 2003 00:55:48 -0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rodrigo Gruppelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: dselect: cosmetic problem, item 3 on pt_BR X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 00:55:48 -0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: dselect Version: 1.10.10 Severity: minor Tags: sid Just a cosmetic problem when using pt_BR. It appears as [I]instalar. It should be [I]nstalar. []s Rodrigo -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux hemp 2.4.20 #1 Qua Abr 23 01:47:56 BRT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR Versions of packages dselect depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.3-0pre7GCC support library ii libncurses5 5.3.20021109-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libstdc++51:3.3-0pre7The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 192102-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 11:53:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 03:53:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B1OkN-0007pO-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 03:53:07 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B1OeY-0001Nd-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:47:06 -0500 From: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.45 $ Subject: Bug#192102: fixed in dpkg 1.10.20 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:47:06 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 X-Spam-Level: Source: dpkg Source-Version: 1.10.20 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dpkg-dev_1.10.20_all.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.10.20_all.deb dpkg-doc_1.10.20_all.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-doc_1.10.20_all.deb dpkg_1.10.20.dsc to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.10.20.dsc dpkg_1.10.20.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.10.20.tar.gz dpkg_1.10.20_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.10.20_i386.deb dselect_1.10.20_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.10.20_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:24:54 + Source: dpkg Binary: dpkg-doc dpkg dselect dpkg-dev dpkg-static Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1.10.20 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Dpkg Development Changed-By: S
Bug#230750: marked as done (dpkg: Minor error in german man page of md5sum)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:47:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#230750: fixed in dpkg 1.10.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2004 09:57:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 01:57:49 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mrelay2.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Anapx-0003hC-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 01:57:49 -0800 Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242]) by mrelay2.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i129vGRJ000111 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:57:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de (arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.96]) by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D00D338 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:24:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237) id 4C7DC6B6C; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:24:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:24:28 +0100 From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dpkg: Minor error in german man page of md5sum Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: dpkg Version: 1.10.18 Severity: minor Tags: l10n There is a minor error in the german version: Der verwandte MD4-Pr=FCfsummen-Algorithmus wurde im Oktober 1995= gek- nackt. MD5 sieht nicht mehr so sicher aus wie fr=FCher. The word bracking has to go "ge-knackt" and not "gek-nackt". =20 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux sixtyfor 2.4.21-pre1 #1 Don Okt 2 18:27:25 CEST 2003 alpha Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii dselect 1.10.18 a user tool to manage Debian p= acka ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an -- no debconf information --=20 Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] er.de gpg signed mail preferredgpg-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] er.de 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreu= tzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/ --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFAHhdMRsxcY/MYpWoRAht3AJ0bihSgSEeJJzOWsGNQ8wKaHGSSKACfWb4H NspwEHr7NkYOmzSfm/NT6z0= =0//f -END PGP SIGNATURE- --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r-- --- Received: (at 230750-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 11:53:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 03:53:08 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B1OkO-0007pa-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 03:53:08 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B1OeY-0001Nj-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:47:06 -0500 From: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.45 $ Subject: Bug#230750: fixed in dpkg 1.10.20 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:47:06 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian
Re: Re: Bug#55364: Order Vicodin Online Anytime ptmjkfnvpvb
I would like to order vicodin for my back pain
Processed: retitle and merge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 146167 [CONFFILE] Add way to purge package but keep conffiles? Bug#146167: apt: No way to purge record of package without purging config files Changed Bug title. > severity 146167 important Bug#146167: [CONFFILE] Add way to purge package but keep conffiles? Severity set to `important'. > merge 146167 47267 Bug#47267: [CONFFILE] /etc/pam.d/su, conffile from conflicting packages, somehow got removed Bug#146167: [CONFFILE] Add way to purge package but keep conffiles? Bug#10879: [CONFFILE] /etc/init.d/sysklogd vanished Bug#33046: [CONFFILE] dpkg: severe breakage after removal of xbase Bug#90623: [CONFFILE] purging bind deletes db.root, db.0, db.255 even though bind 9 installed Bug#98210: [CONFFILE] purging bind after installing bind9 deletes /etc/bind/db.root Bug#109691: [CONFFILE] dpkg: conffiles vs replaces Bug#155456: [CONFFILE] bind9: Problems upgrading from bind to bind9 Bug#204275: [CONFFILE] dpkg --purge removes config files used by other packages Merged 10879 33046 47267 90623 98210 109691 146167 155456 204275. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 133050 dpkg: update-rc.d missing during upgrade from potato Bug#133050: dpkg package should depend on sysvinit Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#102210: marked as done (dpkg: starts up service even if service is disabled in current runlevel)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:31:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not a bug in dpkg has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2001 12:02:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 07:02:54 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (marvin.emdete.de) [:::213.221.114.10] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EV4i-pH-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:02:51 -0500 Received: by marvin.emdete.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AAEAE9D10; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:53:41 +0200 (CEST) From: M.Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: dpkg: starts up service even if service is disabled in current runlevel To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:53:41 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: dpkg Version: 1.9.12 Severity: wishlist i don't know if this is a dpkg-related wish: i install a lot of services on my notebook which i normaly don't use. i remove the links from /etc/rc2.d/ for those service that i don't need. if i want one of those i start those by hand or change the runlevel. if i do an upgrade of the system dpkg (or the scripts of the packages) start up those serveces regardless if the links a present or not for the current runlevel which opens up security holes in my opinion. should those scripts look at the current runlevel and into the corresponding directory? -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux marvin 2.4.5-686 #1 Sun May 27 18:03:50 EST 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages dpkg depends on: ii libc6 2.2.3-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libncurses55.2.20010318-2 Shared libraries for terminal handling ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-0.01060 The GNU stdc++ library --- Received: (at 102210-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 13:31:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 05:31:42 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mars.mj.nl [81.91.1.49] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B1QHm-0004qO-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:31:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 27976 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2004 13:31:11 - Received: from 81-91-5-95-customer.mjdsl.nl (HELO thanatos) (81.91.5.95) by www.mj.nl with SMTP; 11 Mar 2004 13:31:11 - Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEA010D712 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:31:01 +0100 (CET) Subject: Not a bug in dpkg From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:31:01 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 X-Spam-Level: > i don't know if this is a dpkg-related wish: i install a lot of > services on my notebook which i normaly don't use. i remove the links > from /etc/rc2.d/ for those service that i don't need. That is the wrong thing to do. To disable a service in runlevel x you must replace any S sumlink in /etc/rcx.d/ with a K symlink. Often the sequence number of the K symlink is 100 minus the sequence number of the S symlink. > if i want one of > those i start those by hand or change the runlevel. if i do an upgrade > of the system dpkg (or the scripts of the packages) start up those > serveces regardless if the links a present or not for the current > runlevel which opens up security holes in my opinion. This isn't dpkg's fault. Debian just doesn't support "manual" control of services. Adding support requires modifying invoke-rc.d and adding "try-restart" support to service initscripts. -- Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processed: merge wishes for fewer ldconfig runs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 217622 68981 Bug#68981: dpkg: runs ldconfig way too often Bug#217622: dpkg: ldconfig runs everytime a library has to be configured Merged 68981 217622. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: merge wishes for certain things to be done one and only once per install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 217622 17243 Bug#17243: run a script after the installation Bug#217622: dpkg: ldconfig runs everytime a library has to be configured Bug#68981: dpkg: runs ldconfig way too often Merged 17243 68981 217622. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: severity wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 217363 dpkg: Please handle file conflicts more flexibly Bug#217363: Dpkg is too strict about overwriting other packages' files Changed Bug title. > severity 217363 wishlist Bug#217363: dpkg: Please handle file conflicts more flexibly Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: housekeeping -- setting documentation bugs to severity: minor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 174976 minor Bug#174976: [DOC] dpkg-query --showformat is poorly documented Severity set to `minor'. > severity 192812 minor Bug#192812: [DOC] dpkg: --force-bad-verify is not mentioned in dpkg(8) manpage Severity set to `minor'. > severity 211856 minor Bug#211856: [DOC] documentation update for start-stop-daemon Severity set to `minor'. > severity 81355 minor Bug#81355: [DOC] mention debsums in manpages Severity set to `minor'. > severity 110520 minor Bug#110520: [DOC] dpkg manpage over 3 years old Severity set to `minor'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#213818: marked as done (Error installing dpkg)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:06:11 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2003 21:25:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 02 16:25:01 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from law14-f41.law14.hotmail.com (hotmail.com) [64.4.21.41] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A5AwX-000599-00; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 16:25:01 -0500 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:25:00 -0700 Received: from 80.103.127.115 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 21:25:00 GMT X-Originating-IP: [80.103.127.115] X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "ALTAIR -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: Subject: Error installing dpkg Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 21:25:00 + Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2003 21:25:00.0507 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2D67AB0:01C3892B] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: dpkg Version: 1.9.21 I was write: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/Apps/dkpg-1.9.21 this works fine. When I write "make", says: make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/dpkg-1.9.21/dselect' c++ -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-implicit -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/Apps/dpkg-1.9.21/share/locale\" -I../intl -I../intl -I../include -I.. -I. -I../include -I.. -I. -I../optlib -DUSE_ZLIB -g -O2 -c curkeys.cc In file included from curkeys.cc:31: curkeys.h:168: `KEY_EVENT' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [curkeys.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/dpkg-1.9.21/dselect' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 2 I was used gcc 3.2.3 _ Descubre el mayor catálogo de coches de la Red en MSN Motor. http://motor.msn.es/researchcentre/ --- Received: (at 213818-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 14:06:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 06:06:53 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mars.mj.nl [81.91.1.49] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B1Qpp-0006Zw-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:06:53 -0800 Received: (qmail 4059 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2004 14:06:21 - Received: from 81-91-5-95-customer.mjdsl.nl (HELO thanatos) (81.91.5.95) by www.mj.nl with SMTP; 11 Mar 2004 14:06:21 - Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2316910D712 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:06:11 +0100 (CET) Subject: Closing From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:06:11 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 X-Spam-Level: Closing this bizarre report.
Bug#237216: dpkg-dev: dpkg-genchanges can't PGP sign anymore
package dpkg-dev reassign 237216 pgpgpg thanks On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 22:58, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:29:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > What version of PGP are you using? Javier, what version of PGP are > > *you* using? > > Funny, I was about to answer: *snip: pgp 2.6.3a-9* > But then I realised: *snip: pgpgpg 0.13-6 through pgp diversion* > So maybe this is a bug in pgpgpg and the fix should be reverted. > As I (now) understand this. When dpkg-buildpackage calls gpg it needs to insert a blank line, but when it calls pgp, it does not. If it is called with pgp=pgpgpg the blank line *is* needed because it's really talking to gpg. > I see two solutions here: > > 1.- reassign the bug to pgpgpg and revert my patch > This I have done. dpkg_1.10.20 reverts your patch and is uploaded today. This mail reassigns the bug to pgpgpg. pgpgpg is supposed to be a wrapper, therefore it should emulate the behaviour of pgp precisely, this includes blank lines and such-forth. > 2.- have dpkg-buildpackage handle a _third_ method which is similar to > gnupg's but when pgpgpg is installed (i.e. /etc/alternatives/pgp exists). > gah! No. If someone's using pgpgpg then they have a gpg setup, so they can just use the gpg method. > Sorry for the mistake in producing the patch. I should have verified the > facts better. > I tested the patch with pgpgpg as well, so didn't spot it was wrong :-) Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: housekeeping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 229954 minor
Bug#229954: dpkg: Codes for "Desired" and "Status" in `dpkg -l` output
untranslated/untranslatable
Severity set to `minor'.
> retitle 217823 [S-S-D] s-s-d changing to / breaks /etc/init.d/isdnutils
Bug#217823: latest dpkg breakes /usr/init.d/isdnutils
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 218060 [S-S-D] s-s-d changing to / breaks ipppd
Bug#218060: dpkg: start-stop-daemon now does chdir("/")
Changed Bug title.
> tags 200701 patch
Bug#200701: apt-get install foo fails when invoked through sudo by a NFS homed
user
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> merge 24934 134582
Bug#24934: magicfilter and gs-aladdin -- need versioned provides
Bug#134582: please support handling Provides: with specific version
Bug#112131: dpkg: [wish] Providing a specific version of another package.
Merged 24934 112131 134582.
> retitle 45480 dpkg: Please check for leftover diversions on purge
Bug#45480: dpkg: Diversions aren't removed when the owning packages are removed
Changed Bug title.
> merge 81171 58106
Bug#58106: dpkg: Lists old (incorrect) section in package database
Bug#81171: status file is not correctly updated (msyql-server)
Bug#54529: section information from the 'available' file overrides one from
'status'
Bug#230610: Dpkg fails to update package Section in available
Merged 54529 58106 81171 230610.
> severity 180316 wishlist
Bug#180316: dpkg: won't remove fileutils even though coreutils provides
fileutils
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> merge 24934 180316
Bug#24934: magicfilter and gs-aladdin -- need versioned provides
Bug#180316: dpkg: won't remove fileutils even though coreutils provides
fileutils
Bug#112131: dpkg: [wish] Providing a specific version of another package.
Bug#134582: please support handling Provides: with specific version
Merged 24934 112131 134582 180316.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#237216: dpkg-dev: dpkg-genchanges can't PGP sign anymore
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package dpkg-dev Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dpkg-dev > reassign 237216 pgpgpg Bug#237216: dpkg-dev: dpkg-genchanges can't PGP sign anymore Bug reassigned from package `dpkg-dev' to `pgpgpg'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#24950: anti boggy basket cosmic rodgers formal valedictorian chickadee forgot squalid maintain benny dixie bach hush amphibology phenyl stricter sulfonamide corvallis
Unlike old outdated silly products such as excersices, pumps, weights, and even surgery Natural Rapid Growth Formula is guaranteed to lncrease your peenis size and thickness. Not only is Natura1 Rapid Gr0wth Formula guaranteed to deliver results, its also safe, permanent and easy to use! Its so easy that you can take it daily until you have reached your desired size and then discontinue use. However once you have discontinued using our prodcut you will no longer have the other s3xually stimulating benefits of Natural Rap1d Gr0wth Formula so we recommend that our customers keep enough stock around for the special occasions when they need to be at their sexua1 best. Do not take Natural Rapid Growth Formula in the recommended daily amount for more than 6 months as your pen1s may become too large for most women. You must remember that gradual peniis enlargement is the only way to achieve effective, permanent results that both you and your partner will love. Copy this adress in your browser for more information http://www.discountnrg.com/?50925:C
Bug#24950: sguper viaggra
Unlike old outdated silly products such as excersices, pumps, weights, and even surgery Natural Rapid Growth Formula is guaranteed to lncrease your peenis size and thickness. Not only is Natura1 Rapid Gr0wth Formula guaranteed to deliver results, its also safe, permanent and easy to use! Its so easy that you can take it daily until you have reached your desired size and then discontinue use. However once you have discontinued using our prodcut you will no longer have the other s3xually stimulating benefits of Natural Rap1d Gr0wth Formula so we recommend that our customers keep enough stock around for the special occasions when they need to be at their sexua1 best. Do not take Natural Rapid Growth Formula in the recommended daily amount for more than 6 months as your pen1s may become too large for most women. You must remember that gradual peniis enlargement is the only way to achieve effective, permanent results that both you and your partner will love. Copy this adress in your browser for more information http://www.discountnrg.com/?50925:C
Bug#217862: two complaints about dpkg allowing versioned dependency violations on upgrade
> I was tempted to merge #217862 and #170825 but I can't be sure > that they report the same bug since the former involves a > normal dependency and the latter involves a dependency on a > virtual package. However, the submitters of these bugs may > be interested to compare notes. Yes, this really seems to be the same problem: dpkg does not check if new version of a package still satisfies the dependences that have been satisfied by the old varsion of the same package.
Bug#24950: ciaglis at 3$ per dose
Unlike old outdated silly products such as excersices, pumps, weights, and even surgery Natural Rapid Growth Formula is guaranteed to lncrease your peenis size and thickness. Not only is Natura1 Rapid Gr0wth Formula guaranteed to deliver results, its also safe, permanent and easy to use! Its so easy that you can take it daily until you have reached your desired size and then discontinue use. However once you have discontinued using our prodcut you will no longer have the other s3xually stimulating benefits of Natural Rap1d Gr0wth Formula so we recommend that our customers keep enough stock around for the special occasions when they need to be at their sexua1 best. Do not take Natural Rapid Growth Formula in the recommended daily amount for more than 6 months as your pen1s may become too large for most women. You must remember that gradual peniis enlargement is the only way to achieve effective, permanent results that both you and your partner will love. Copy this adress in your browser for more information http://www.discountnrg.com/?50925:C
Bug#55364: ciaglis at 3$ per dose
Unlike old outdated silly products such as excersices, pumps, weights, and even surgery Natural Rapid Growth Formula is guaranteed to lncrease your peenis size and thickness. Not only is Natura1 Rapid Gr0wth Formula guaranteed to deliver results, its also safe, permanent and easy to use! Its so easy that you can take it daily until you have reached your desired size and then discontinue use. However once you have discontinued using our prodcut you will no longer have the other s3xually stimulating benefits of Natural Rap1d Gr0wth Formula so we recommend that our customers keep enough stock around for the special occasions when they need to be at their sexua1 best. Do not take Natural Rapid Growth Formula in the recommended daily amount for more than 6 months as your pen1s may become too large for most women. You must remember that gradual peniis enlargement is the only way to achieve effective, permanent results that both you and your partner will love. Copy this adress in your browser for more information http://www.discountnrg.com/?50925:C
Re: Building debs: Interesting inter-dependency conundrum.
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 07:59, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > This much I know: I need to set "Depends: bee" in "eh"'s control file
> > to have the brand new "bee" package installed during the upgrade of
> > "eh".
>
> Right.
>
> > But the twist is that "eh" needs to be configured (I don't care what
> > order they are unpacked in) prior to "bee" because "eh"('s postinst)
> > does work that needs to be done before "bee"'s configuration/postinst
> > can be done.
>
> Ugh. The only way I can think of to enforce that is to have bee
> Pre-Depend on eh, but I'm not quite sure it that will work as well since
> it isn't a standard dependency cycle which dpkg will break.
OK. Not having tried your Pre-Depends solution yet, would moving the
operation that needs to be done in "eh"s postinst prior "bee"s postinst
into "eh"s preinst be a better solution? Would that ensure that the
operation will be done before "bee"s postinst?
So to summarize, if I have "eh" depend on "bee" and have "eh-op" in
"eh"s preinst and "bee-op" in "bee"'s postinst, doing a --dist-upgrade
will upgrade "eh", pull in "bee" and ensure that "eh-op" will run before
"bee-op". Am I correct? Is this a vaild option?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#47404: Job confirmation
We are Trusted by University and Industry for the past 4 years and we have an excellent reputation. in any field of your choice but are not limited to: Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) Give us a calll at 1 212 629 1971 to receive your diiploma withinn days.
Bug#24950: Job confirmation
We are Trusted by University and Industry for the past 4 years and we have an excellent reputation. in any field of your choice but are not limited to: Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) Give us a calll at 1 212 629 1971 to receive your diiploma withinn days.
Bug#55364: Job confirmation
We are Trusted by University and Industry for the past 4 years and we have an excellent reputation. in any field of your choice but are not limited to: Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) Give us a calll at 1 212 629 1971 to receive your diiploma withinn days.
Bug#55364: Job confirmation
We are Trusted by University and Industry for the past 4 years and we have an excellent reputation. in any field of your choice but are not limited to: Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) Give us a calll at 1 212 629 1971 to receive your diiploma withinn days.
