Bug#328210: ksim: Needs rebuild against libsnmp9-dev

[Seo Sanghyeon]

Package: ksim
Version: 4:3.4.2-2
Severity: serious

ksim depends on libsnmp5 which is no more in Unstable. It needs
rebuild against libsnmp9-dev. See #322500.

Seo Sanghyeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems.

> The arlib subdir isn't distributable.
> Neither is the entire libparse subdir, or anything else by Frank Kardel.

> I'm not actually sure it will build without these bits.

> So I guess NTP should be removed from Debian.  It's not very 
> maintained anyhow, having multiple RC bugs open for quite a while.

What are you going to replace it with?  AFAIK, ntp is the only package
we have in Debian which supports useful clock synchronization, which is
essential for a number of other services (e.g., Kerberos).

Obviously we can't ship non-distributable code, but I'm not going to
remove ntp from testing just because it appears at first blush to be
inconsistently licensed.  The maintainers should have a chance to clear
up this question first.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

[George Danchev]

On Wednesday 14 September 2005 10:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems.
> >
> > The arlib subdir isn't distributable.
> > Neither is the entire libparse subdir, or anything else by Frank Kardel.
> >
> > I'm not actually sure it will build without these bits.
> >
> > So I guess NTP should be removed from Debian.  It's not very
> > maintained anyhow, having multiple RC bugs open for quite a while.
>
> What are you going to replace it with?  AFAIK, ntp is the only package
> we have in Debian which supports useful clock synchronization, which is
> essential for a number of other services (e.g., Kerberos).

I've never tested openntpd, but it is the obvious replacement in case of legal 
problems with ntp and it has been released with sarge.

> Obviously we can't ship non-distributable code, but I'm not going to
> remove ntp from testing just because it appears at first blush to be
> inconsistently licensed.  The maintainers should have a chance to clear
> up this question first.

Agreed.

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328215: splay: uninstallable in sid

[Michael Meskes]

Package: splay
Version: 0.9.5.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

splay depends on libid3-3.8.3 which does not exist anymore. A simple
recompilation against the up-to-date -dev packages fixes the problem.

Michael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328219: autobook: [NONFREE-DOC] OPL v0.4

[Joost van Baal]

Package: autobook
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG

Hi,

In http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html , it is
explained why the OPL (Open Publication License) v1 is considered to be
non-DFSG-free.  All 3 reasons also apply to the "OPEN PUBLICATION
LICENSE Draft v0.4, 8 June 1999", as used by the autobook.  Therefore,
OPL v0.4 is non-DFSG-free, and the autobook package should be removed
from main.

See Bug #136197 for a discussion dating from May 2002 about the Autobook
and licensing.  It's a pity people taking part in that discussion
weren't aware of the additional restrictions in the OPL :(

It might be reasonable to choose not to upload autobook to non-free: the
content is getting obsolete anyway.

Bye,

Joost



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#328218: imp3: CAN-2005-1319: Cross-site scripting

[Martin Pitt]

Package: imp3
Version: 3.2.6-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Hi!

Imp 3.2.8 brought a security fix, please see

  http://lists.horde.org/archives/imp/Week-of-Mon-20050418/041912.html

This also contains a patch.

Please mention the CAN number in the changelog when you fix this.
imp4 is maybe already fixed, can you please check this?

Thanks,

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

[Matthijs Mohlmann]

George Danchev wrote:

On Wednesday 14 September 2005 10:03, Steve Langasek wrote:


On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:


I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems.

The arlib subdir isn't distributable.
Neither is the entire libparse subdir, or anything else by Frank Kardel.

I'm not actually sure it will build without these bits.

So I guess NTP should be removed from Debian.  It's not very
maintained anyhow, having multiple RC bugs open for quite a while.


What are you going to replace it with?  AFAIK, ntp is the only package
we have in Debian which supports useful clock synchronization, which is
essential for a number of other services (e.g., Kerberos).



I've never tested openntpd, but it is the obvious replacement in case of legal 
problems with ntp and it has been released with sarge.



I use openntpd and that works better then ntp IMHO.




Obviously we can't ship non-distributable code, but I'm not going to
remove ntp from testing just because it appears at first blush to be
inconsistently licensed.  The maintainers should have a chance to clear
up this question first.



Agreed.



Also agreed.

Regards,

Matthijs Mohlmann


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314465: CA.pl and openssl.cnf default to insecure MD5 digest

[Christoph Martin]

severity 314465 important
quit

Version 0.9.8 will fix this bug. The defautl will be SHA1 and SHA-256
etc. will be included.

I downgrade the severity temporarily to important to allow Version 0.9.7
to enter testing before I upload the new upstream 0.9.8.

Christoph

Andreas Bogk schrieb:
> Package: openssl
> Version: 0.9.7e-3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
> 
> 
> openssl.cnf defaults to usage of MD5 as digest algorithm for generation
> of certificates and CAs.  MD5 must be considered broken beyond hope,
> we're not just talking about theoretical attacks, but attacks feasible
> for everybody. X.509 keys with colliding checksums (and thus false
> certificates) have been shown. See:
> 
> http://www.cits.rub.de/MD5Collisions/
> 
> for another example.
> 
> Unfortunately, there seem to be problems with RIPEMD160 in practice
> (e.g. the Debian Thunderbird package doesn't understand RIPEMD160).  So
> the only reasonable choice at the moment is SHA-1, even though SHA-1 has
> been theoretically weakend already, and RIPEMD160 would be preferable.  
> I suggest adding
> 
> default_md: sha-1
> 
> in the req and ca sections of openssl.cnf, and talking the upstream
> maintainers into supporting SHA-384 or SHA-512.
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
> Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> 
> Versions of packages openssl depends on:
> ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
> an
> ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
> 
> -- no debconf information

-- 

Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
  Fax: +49-6131-3922856


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#314465: CA.pl and openssl.cnf default to insecure MD5 digest

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 314465 important
Bug#314465: CA.pl and openssl.cnf default to insecure MD5 digest
Severity set to `important'.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328223: poedit: FTBFS mips/experimental, missing build-dep dpatch

[Martin Zobel-Helas]

Package: poedit
Severity: serious
Version: 1.3.3-4
Tags: experimental

Hi,

you seem to miss a build-dep on dpatch

> Checking correctness of source dependencies...
> Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-4 
> linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1 gcc-4.0_4.0.1-6 g++-4.0_4.0.1-6 
> binutils_2.16.1-2 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.1-6 libstdc++6_4.0.1-6
> --
> dpkg-source: extracting poedit in poedit-1.3.3
> su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info.
> (Ignored)
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is poedit
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.3.3-4
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture mips
>  /usr/bin/sudo debian/rules clean
> debian/rules:26: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
> make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'.  Stop.

Full build-log availible on
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=poedit&ver=1.3.3-4&arch=mips&stamp=1126663757&file=log&as=raw

Greetings
Martin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328223: poedit: FTBFS mips/experimental, missing build-dep dpatch

[Luk Claes]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:20:05AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: poedit
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1.3.3-4
> Tags: experimental
> 
> Hi,

Hi Martin

Thanks for your bugreport.

> you seem to miss a build-dep on dpatch

Not quite, I seem to have forgotten to remove everything regarding
dpatch ;-)

Cheers

Luk

> > Checking correctness of source dependencies...
> > Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-4 
> > linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1 gcc-4.0_4.0.1-6 g++-4.0_4.0.1-6 
> > binutils_2.16.1-2 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.1-6 libstdc++6_4.0.1-6
> > --
> > dpkg-source: extracting poedit in poedit-1.3.3
> > su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info.
> > (Ignored)
> > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is poedit
> > dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.3.3-4
> > dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture mips
> >  /usr/bin/sudo debian/rules clean
> > debian/rules:26: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
> > make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'.  Stop.
> 
> Full build-log availible on
> http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=poedit&ver=1.3.3-4&arch=mips&stamp=1126663757&file=log&as=raw


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328225: grubconf destroys menu.lst

[M. Dietrich]

Package: grubconf
Version: 0.5.1-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


i checked grubconf today. after playing around i pressed 'Revert' and
after that i choose 'close'. the dialog did not close. so i pressed
the close-button of the windowmanager. the dialog stayed (i waited
several seconds after each buttonpress) after that i stopped the
program by pressing ^C on the console where i started it. 

after that i ended up with two empty files: menu.lst and menu.lst~
with size 0. i did not recognize that, rebooted and had to type in the
commands by hand :(

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages grubconf depends on:
ii  grub 0.95+cvs20040624-17 GRand Unified Bootloader
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.10.0-1Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.10.0-1The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libesd-alsa0 [libesd 0.2.36-1Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - 
ii  libgconf2-4  2.10.1-2GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libgcrypt11  1.2.1-4 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-keyring00.4.3-2 GNOME keyring services library
ii  libgnome2-0  2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.10.1-5The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgnutls11  1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgpg-error01.1-4   library for common error values an
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.10-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-7  Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liborbit21:2.12.2-3  libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-7  X Window System Session Management
ii  libtasn1-2   0.2.13-1Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7  X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxml2  2.6.21-1GNOME XML library
ii  xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-7  X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-4   compression library - runtime

grubconf recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328143: was a hfsplus but missing nls_utf8 bug.

[Sven Luther]

severity 328143 normal
thanks

We traced this problem to hfsplus needing nls_utf8 as module, which d-i did
not include, so downgrading the severity. waldi said he would provide a patch
for a more graceful handling on this, so i leave htis bug open until then.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: was a hfsplus but missing nls_utf8 bug.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 328143 normal
Bug#328143: [powerpc] d-i dies on apple hardware with a HFS+ kernel OOPS, 
freezing base-installer
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328227: libmpfr-dev: Non-free doc "mpfr.texi" : GFDL 1.1

[Laurent Fousse]

Package: libmpfr-dev
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

The MPFR documentation is provided as texinfo source file licensed
under the GFDL version 1.1 "or any later version".

Since there is only a limited number of useful rephrasing of this
technical documentation, I consider an attempt to rewrite it a
complete waste of time and I won't be doing it.

Upstream might consider the option of a relicensing, the problem being
that the copyright was assigned to the FSF. If you know how to deal
with such a situation, please reply.

My short time plan is to obliterate the documentation from the source
tarball.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#298709: chrony: tentative patch

[giuseppe bonacci]

Package: chrony
Version: 1.20-8
Followup-For: Bug #298709


After applying the following patch, I tried building (with gcc-4.0),
installing and running the chrony package on Testing/i386, and it seems
to run smoothly.

Unfortunately I have no 64-bit capable hardware to test on.  Would you
like to try it out?

regards.
g.b.

--- chrony-1.20/addrfilt.c  2005-09-14 10:10:56.0 +0200
+++ chrony-1.20-peppe/addrfilt.c2005-09-14 10:57:32.0 +0200
@@ -43,17 +43,15 @@
 /* Define the table size */
 #define TABLE_SIZE (1UL<

Bug#328200: [debian-ntp] Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

[Jochen Friedrich]

Hi Matthijs,

>> I've never tested openntpd, but it is the obvious replacement in case
>> of legal problems with ntp and it has been released with sarge.
>
> I use openntpd and that works better then ntp IMHO.

Last time i checked,

- it doesn't support attached clocks, so no stratum 1
- it only seems to speak SNTP, so it has lower accurancy than ntp, it
also doesn't lock its memory from being swapped.
- it doesn't seem to have multicast support.

At least for me, it doesn't work better than ntp ;-)

Thanks,
Jochen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328128: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-depends on dpatch)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:17:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328128: fixed in tecnoballz 0.91cvs20050828-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 17:44:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 10:44:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-082-083-116-046.arcor-ip.net (gleep.earth.sol) 
[82.83.116.46] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFEpn-0006Bm-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:44:43 -0700
Received: from cts by gleep.earth.sol with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EFEpm-7H-4N
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:44:42 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: missing build-depends on dpatch
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:44:42 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tecnoballz
Version: 0.91cvs20050828-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Automatic build of tecnoballz_0.91cvs20050828-1 on tanda by sbuild/m68k 42
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libsdl-mixer1.2-dev, libmikmod2-dev, 
libxext-dev, libvorbis-dev, libogg-dev, libsmpeg-dev, g++ (>= 4), 
libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev
[...]
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1 gcc-4.0_4.0.1-6 g++-4.0_4.0.1-6 
binutils_2.16.1-2 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.1-6 libstdc++6_4.0.1-6
--
dpkg-source: extracting tecnoballz in tecnoballz-0.91cvs20050828
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is tecnoballz
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.91cvs20050828-1
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture m68k
 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
debian/rules:12: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'.  Stop.

Christian

---
Received: (at 328128-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 09:19:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 02:19:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFTOR-0006I5-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:17:27 -0700
From: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328128: fixed in tecnoballz 0.91cvs20050828-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:17:27 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: tecnoballz
Source-Version: 0.91cvs20050828-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tecnoballz, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tecnoballz-data_0.91cvs20050828-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tecnoballz/tecnoballz-data_0.91cvs20050828-2_all.deb
tecnoballz_0.91cvs20050828-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tecnoballz/tecnoballz_0.91cvs20050828-2.diff.gz
tecnoballz_0.91cvs20050828-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tecnoballz/tecnoballz_0.91cvs20050828-2.dsc
tecnoballz_0.91cvs20050828-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tecnoballz/tecnoballz_0.91cvs20050828-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tecnoballz package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#325208: marked as done (celestia has spurious build-dependency on libgnomeuimm2.0-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325208: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2005 20:22:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 26 13:22:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.netexpress.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E8kin-0005tT-00; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:22:41 -0700
Received: by tennyson.netexpress.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id 40DF57049; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:22:41 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: celestia has spurious build-dependency on libgnomeuimm2.0-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: celestia
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: serious

The current version of celestia has a build-dependency on
libgnomeuimm2.0-dev.  Judging by both the build logs and the resulting
package dependencies, this is incorrect: you should be build-depending
on libgnomeui-dev, not on libgnomeuimm2.0-dev, which is a C++-specific
library.  It is also obsolete, and I will be requesting its removal from
the archive.  Please fix this build-dependency.

--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDD3oRKN6ufymYLloRAib1AKCqCpj2aCBnx8KiccxXEXZWdJvlggCgrzTZ
KhpzrbE6w+WVxu6baiXjTe0=
=2NrB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs--

---
Received: (at 325208-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 09:48:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 02:48:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFTrA-0005Wt-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
From: Mathias Weyland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325208: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: celestia
Source-Version: 1.3.2-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
celestia, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

celestia-common_1.3.2-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia-common_1.3.2-3_all.deb
celestia-glut_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia-glut_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
celestia-gnome_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia-gnome_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
celestia_1.3.2-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia_1.3.2-3.diff.gz
celestia_1.3.2-3.dsc
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia_1.3.2-3.dsc
celestia_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia_1.3.2-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mathias Weyland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of update

Bug#326716: marked as done (celestia: FTBFS: Build-Depends cannot be satisfied because the package libgnomeuimm2.0-dev cannot be found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325208: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 09:22:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 02:22:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c203105.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.203.105] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECDBe-00046w-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 02:22:46 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECDBc-0007gW-Ni; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:22:44 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: celestia: FTBFS: Build-Depends cannot be satisfied because the package 
libgnomeuimm2.0-dev cannot be found
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:22:44 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: celestia
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'celestia' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

Building celestia unstable main amd64...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Build-Depends dependency for celestia cannot be satisfied because the 
package libgnomeuimm2.0-dev cannot be found

Please change the Build-Depends to 'libgnomeuimm-2.6-dev'
in debian/control.

Additionally, the attached patch fixes some pointer casting issues
for 64-bit builds.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/celestia-1.3.2/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/celestia-1.3.2/debian/control   2005-09-05 08:53:12.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2005-09-05 08:06:56.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: science
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Mathias Weyland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), freeglut3-dev, gtkglarea5-dev, 
libgnome-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, kdelibs4-dev, liblua50-dev, liblualib50-dev, 
libgnomeuimm2.0-dev, libgtkglext1-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), freeglut3-dev, gtkglarea5-dev, 
libgnome-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, kdelibs4-dev, liblua50-dev, liblualib50-dev, 
libgnomeuimm-2.6-dev, libgtkglext1-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: celestia-common
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/celestia-1.3.2/src/celestia/gtkmain.cpp 
./src/celestia/gtkmain.cpp
--- ../tmp-orig/celestia-1.3.2/src/celestia/gtkmain.cpp 2004-08-04 
07:10:11.0 +
+++ ./src/celestia/gtkmain.cpp  2005-09-05 08:36:32.0 +
@@ -324,14 +324,14 @@
 {
bool state = getActiveState(w);
 
-appRenderer->setRenderFlags((appRenderer->getRenderFlags() & ~(int)flag) |
- (state ? (int)flag : 0));
+appRenderer->setRenderFlags((appRenderer->getRenderFlags() & ~(long)flag) |
+ (state ? (long)flag : 0));
 
prefs->renderFlags = appRenderer->getRenderFlags();
 
#ifdef GNOME
// Update GConf
-   switch ((int)flag) {
+   switch ((long)flag) {
case Renderer::ShowStars: setFlag(0, "stars", state); break;
case Renderer::ShowPlanets: setFlag(0, "planets", state); break;
case Renderer::ShowGalaxies: setFlag(0, "galaxies", state); 
break;
@@ -361,12 +361,12 @@
 {
bool state = getActiveState(w);
 
-appRenderer->setLabelMode((appRenderer->getLabelMode() & ~(int)flag) |
-   (state ? (int)flag : 0));
+appRenderer->setLabelMode((appRenderer->getLabelMode() & ~(long)flag) |
+   (state ? (long)flag : 0));
 
#ifdef GNOME
// Update GConf
-   switch ((int)flag) {
+   switch ((long)flag) {
case Renderer::StarLabels: setFlag(2, "star", state); break;
case Renderer::PlanetLabels: setFlag(2, "planet", state); break;
case Renderer::MoonLabels: setFlag(2, "moon", state); break;
@@ -388,12 +388,12 @@
 {
bool state = getActiveState(w);
 
-appRenderer->setOrbitMask((appRenderer->getOrbitMask() & ~(int)flag) |
-   (state ? (int)flag : 0));
+appRenderer->setOrbitMask((appRenderer->getOrbitMask() & ~(long)flag) |
+ 

Bug#326567: marked as done (celestia: package has unmet dependencies)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326567: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 03:22:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 03 20:22:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omta03sl.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.92.155] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBl5i-00042b-00; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 20:22:46 -0700
Received: from alpha.southsky.com.au ([61.9.204.61])
  by omta03sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 03:22:14 +
Received: from [192.168.0.8] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
by alpha.southsky.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1EBl5A-0005HQ-5Y; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 13:22:12 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: James Ring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: celestia: package has unmet dependencies
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 13:22:11 +1000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: celestia
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi there,

Although you're probably already aware of the problem, I thought I'd
post this bug for the record.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  celestia: Depends: kdelibs4 (>= 4:3.3.2-6.1) but it is not installable
Depends: libqt3c102-mt (>= 3:3.3.4) but it is not 
installable
E: Broken packages

Should these dependencies be changed to kdelibs4c2 and libqt3-mt
instead?

Thanks for your time.

Regards,
James

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages celestia depends on:
ii  celestia-common   1.3.2-2Datafiles for Celestia, a real-tim
pn  kdelibs4   (no description available)
ii  libart-2.0-2  2.3.17-1   Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio2 1.7-3  The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgamin0 [libfam0c102]   0.1.5-2Client library for the gamin file 
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-6  GCC support library
ii  libglu1-xorg [libglu1]6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Mesa OpenGL utility library [X.Org
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11  0.5.18-1   GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libjpeg62 6b-10  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liblua50  5.0.2-5Main interpreter library for the L
ii  liblualib50   5.0.2-5Extension library for the Lua 5.0 
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
pn  libqt3c102-mt  (no description available)
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.6-9  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1   1.1.3-1X cursor management library
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2   2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxrandr26.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0-2  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt66.8.2

Bug#326716: marked as done (celestia: FTBFS: Build-Depends cannot be satisfied because the package libgnomeuimm2.0-dev cannot be found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326716: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 09:22:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 02:22:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c203105.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.203.105] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECDBe-00046w-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 02:22:46 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECDBc-0007gW-Ni; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:22:44 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: celestia: FTBFS: Build-Depends cannot be satisfied because the package 
libgnomeuimm2.0-dev cannot be found
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:22:44 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: celestia
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'celestia' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

Building celestia unstable main amd64...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Build-Depends dependency for celestia cannot be satisfied because the 
package libgnomeuimm2.0-dev cannot be found

Please change the Build-Depends to 'libgnomeuimm-2.6-dev'
in debian/control.

Additionally, the attached patch fixes some pointer casting issues
for 64-bit builds.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/celestia-1.3.2/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/celestia-1.3.2/debian/control   2005-09-05 08:53:12.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2005-09-05 08:06:56.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: science
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Mathias Weyland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), freeglut3-dev, gtkglarea5-dev, 
libgnome-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, kdelibs4-dev, liblua50-dev, liblualib50-dev, 
libgnomeuimm2.0-dev, libgtkglext1-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), freeglut3-dev, gtkglarea5-dev, 
libgnome-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, kdelibs4-dev, liblua50-dev, liblualib50-dev, 
libgnomeuimm-2.6-dev, libgtkglext1-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: celestia-common
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/celestia-1.3.2/src/celestia/gtkmain.cpp 
./src/celestia/gtkmain.cpp
--- ../tmp-orig/celestia-1.3.2/src/celestia/gtkmain.cpp 2004-08-04 
07:10:11.0 +
+++ ./src/celestia/gtkmain.cpp  2005-09-05 08:36:32.0 +
@@ -324,14 +324,14 @@
 {
bool state = getActiveState(w);
 
-appRenderer->setRenderFlags((appRenderer->getRenderFlags() & ~(int)flag) |
- (state ? (int)flag : 0));
+appRenderer->setRenderFlags((appRenderer->getRenderFlags() & ~(long)flag) |
+ (state ? (long)flag : 0));
 
prefs->renderFlags = appRenderer->getRenderFlags();
 
#ifdef GNOME
// Update GConf
-   switch ((int)flag) {
+   switch ((long)flag) {
case Renderer::ShowStars: setFlag(0, "stars", state); break;
case Renderer::ShowPlanets: setFlag(0, "planets", state); break;
case Renderer::ShowGalaxies: setFlag(0, "galaxies", state); 
break;
@@ -361,12 +361,12 @@
 {
bool state = getActiveState(w);
 
-appRenderer->setLabelMode((appRenderer->getLabelMode() & ~(int)flag) |
-   (state ? (int)flag : 0));
+appRenderer->setLabelMode((appRenderer->getLabelMode() & ~(long)flag) |
+   (state ? (long)flag : 0));
 
#ifdef GNOME
// Update GConf
-   switch ((int)flag) {
+   switch ((long)flag) {
case Renderer::StarLabels: setFlag(2, "star", state); break;
case Renderer::PlanetLabels: setFlag(2, "planet", state); break;
case Renderer::MoonLabels: setFlag(2, "moon", state); break;
@@ -388,12 +388,12 @@
 {
bool state = getActiveState(w);
 
-appRenderer->setOrbitMask((appRenderer->getOrbitMask() & ~(int)flag) |
-   (state ? (int)flag : 0));
+appRenderer->setOrbitMask((appRenderer->getOrbitMask() & ~(long)flag) |
+ 

Bug#325208: marked as done (celestia has spurious build-dependency on libgnomeuimm2.0-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326716: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2005 20:22:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 26 13:22:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.netexpress.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E8kin-0005tT-00; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:22:41 -0700
Received: by tennyson.netexpress.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id 40DF57049; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:22:41 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: celestia has spurious build-dependency on libgnomeuimm2.0-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: celestia
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: serious

The current version of celestia has a build-dependency on
libgnomeuimm2.0-dev.  Judging by both the build logs and the resulting
package dependencies, this is incorrect: you should be build-depending
on libgnomeui-dev, not on libgnomeuimm2.0-dev, which is a C++-specific
library.  It is also obsolete, and I will be requesting its removal from
the archive.  Please fix this build-dependency.

--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDD3oRKN6ufymYLloRAib1AKCqCpj2aCBnx8KiccxXEXZWdJvlggCgrzTZ
KhpzrbE6w+WVxu6baiXjTe0=
=2NrB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs--

---
Received: (at 326716-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 09:48:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 02:48:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFTrA-0005Wx-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
From: Mathias Weyland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326716: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: celestia
Source-Version: 1.3.2-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
celestia, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

celestia-common_1.3.2-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia-common_1.3.2-3_all.deb
celestia-glut_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia-glut_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
celestia-gnome_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia-gnome_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
celestia_1.3.2-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia_1.3.2-3.diff.gz
celestia_1.3.2-3.dsc
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia_1.3.2-3.dsc
celestia_1.3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/celestia/celestia_1.3.2-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mathias Weyland <[EMAIL PROTEC

Processed: #301390: applies to sid and sarge as well

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 301390 -experimental
Bug#301390: libjavascript-perl: Simple class binding causes SIGSEGV
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328238: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on s390/experimental

[Martin Zobel-Helas]

Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Bits from the build-log:

> make[5]: Entering directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall'
> make[6]: Entering directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/public'
> make[6]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/public'
> make[6]: Entering directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src'
> xptcall.cpp
> c++ -o xptcall.o -c -I../../../../dist/include/system_wrappers -include 
> ../../../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" 
> -DOSARCH=\"Linux\" -DBUILD_ID=2005091410 -DEXPORT_XPTC_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM 
> -D_IMPL_NS_BASE   -I../../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../../dist/include 
> -I../../../../dist/include/nspr -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include  
>   -fPIC   -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith 
> -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy 
> -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG 
> -DTRIMMED -pipe -w -O2   -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include 
> ../../../../mozilla-config.h -Wp,-MD,.deps/xptcall.pp xptcall.cpp
> rm -f libxptcall.a
> ar cr libxptcall.a xptcall.o  
> ranlib libxptcall.a
> /build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/config/nsinstall -R -m 644 
> libxptcall.a ../../../../dist/lib
> make[7]: Entering directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md'
> make[8]: Entering directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix'
> xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp
> c++ -o xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.o -c 
> -I../../../../../../dist/include/system_wrappers -include 
> ../../../../../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" 
> -DOSARCH=\"Linux\" -DBUILD_ID=2005091410 -DEXPORT_XPTC_API   
> -I../../../../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../../../../dist/include 
> -I../../../../../../dist/include/nspr -I/usr/include -I/usr/include 
> -I/usr/include -I../../../../../../dist/sdk/include -I./../..-fPIC   
> -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align 
> -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor 
> -Wno-long-long -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -pipe -w -O2 
> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-inline -fomit-frame-pointer -mbackchain   
> -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../../../../mozilla-config.h 
> -Wp,-MD,.deps/xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.pp xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp
> xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp: In function 'nsresult 
> XPTC_InvokeByIndex(nsISupports*, PRUint32, PRUint32, nsXPTCVariant*)':
> xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp:248: error: can't find a register in class 
> 'ADDR_REGS' while reloading 'asm'
> make[8]: *** [xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.o] Error 1
> make[8]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix'
> make[7]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[7]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md'
> make[6]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[6]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src'
> make[5]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[5]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall'
> make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[4]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect'
> make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom'
> make[2]: *** [tier_2] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg'
> make[1]: *** [default] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

Full build-log is availible at
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=mozilla-firefox&ver=1.4.99%2B1.5beta1.dfsg-1&arch=s390&stamp=1126693125&file=log&as=raw

Greetings
Martin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Bah, merging

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 327664 normal
Bug#327664: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Severity set to `normal'.

> reassign 327664 wnpp
Bug#327664: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `doc-debian-ko' to `wnpp'.

> merge 327664 327764
Bug#327664: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Bug#327764: O: doc-debian-ko -- Debian FAQ and other documents to Korean
Merged 327664 327764.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328241: gnometab: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: gnometab
Version: 0.7.4-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'gnometab' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

 debian/rules clean
debian/rules:8: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'.  Stop.

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gnometab-0.7.4/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/gnometab-0.7.4/debian/control   2005-09-14 10:38:24.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2005-09-14 10:38:22.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: gnome
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Joachim Breitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), pkg-config, libgnomeui-dev, 
libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libgnomeprint2.2-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper, dpatch, pkg-config, libgnomeui-dev, 
libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libgnomeprint2.2-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: gnometab


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328124: tora: ftbfs [sparc] in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE libraries installed.

[Michael Meskes]

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:10:43AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: tora
> Version: 1.3.18-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> 
> tora failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
> 
> checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers 
> checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... (cached) yes
> checking for libXext... yes
> checking for Xinerama... no
> using lib directory suffix 64
> checking for KDE... configure: error:
> in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE libraries installed. This will fail.
> So, check this please and use another prefix!
> make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1

Now this is strange. It compiled well on all other archs it seems. The
configure script tests for the existance of /usr/lib/libkio.la and
prints the above mentioned error message if the file is not present. But
this file is part of kdelibs4-dev which tora build-depends on. Are you
sure kdelibs4-dev is installed? If it is, which version does it have?
Does the file /usr/lib/libkio.la exist on your system?

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328210: marked as done (ksim: Needs rebuild against libsnmp9-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328210: fixed in kdeutils 4:3.4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 06:48:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 23:48:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sparcs.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.234.102] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFR3p-0002On-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:48:01 -0700
Received: from tinuviel by sparcs.kaist.ac.kr with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EFR3n-0007xN-Vz
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:47:59 +0900
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:47:59 +0900
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ksim: Needs rebuild against libsnmp9-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: SPARCS, KAIST
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ksim
Version: 4:3.4.2-2
Severity: serious

ksim depends on libsnmp5 which is no more in Unstable. It needs
rebuild against libsnmp9-dev. See #322500.

Seo Sanghyeon

---
Received: (at 328210-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 10:48:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 03:48:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFUnE-0006kS-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:47:08 -0700
From: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328210: fixed in kdeutils 4:3.4.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:47:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: kdeutils
Source-Version: 4:3.4.2-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kdeutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ark_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/ark_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kcalc_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kcalc_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kcharselect_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kcharselect_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kdelirc_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdelirc_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kdessh_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdessh_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kdeutils-dev_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdeutils-dev_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kdeutils-doc-html_3.4.2-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdeutils-doc-html_3.4.2-3_all.deb
kdeutils_3.4.2-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdeutils_3.4.2-3.diff.gz
kdeutils_3.4.2-3.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdeutils_3.4.2-3.dsc
kdeutils_3.4.2-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdeutils_3.4.2-3_all.deb
kdf_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdf_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kedit_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kedit_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kfloppy_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kfloppy_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kgpg_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kgpg_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
khexedit_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/khexedit_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kjots_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kjots_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
klaptopdaemon_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/klaptopdaemon_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kmilo_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kmilo_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kregexpeditor_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kregexpeditor_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
ksim_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/ksim_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
ktimer_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/ktimer_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
kwalletmanager_3.4.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kwalletmanager_3.4.2-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen th

Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.

[Michal]

Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I 
have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-power4-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=UTF-8) 
(ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2.1  The GNU core utilities
ii  initrd-tools  0.1.82 tools to create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools 3.2-pre8-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64 recommends no packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328243: slibcat not created at install-time

[Simon Richard Clarkstone]

Package: slib
Version: 3a1-4.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I had problems when trying to use SLIB for the first time:

guile> (use-modules (ice-9 slib))
guile> (require 'priority-queue)
ERROR: In procedure open-file:
ERROR: Permission denied: "/usr/share/slibcat"
ABORT: (system-error)

The package was completely unusable, as the library functions weren't
being loaded.

I checked in /usr/share/, and found that /usr/share/slibcat did not exist,
and permissions (0755) ensured that only root would be able to create
this file.  Upon reading the documentation, I found that SLIB attempts to
create slibcat if it does not exist.  Since the catalogue must be created
by root, and must be created before the SLIB is usable, it should be
created at install-time, so that the package will be immediately usable
without an admin having to run (require 'new-catalogue) or whatever.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327424: marked as done (mailutils-imap4d: Remotely exploitable format string vulnerability in SEARCH command)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327424: fixed in mailutils 1:0.6.90-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 00:23:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 17:23:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EDt9f-0002nB-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:23:39 -0700
Received: from dsl-084-059-136-208.arcor-ip.net ([84.59.136.208] 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EDt9a-0002eq-DI
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 02:23:34 +0200
Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EDtAR-0001y9-9L; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 02:24:27 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mailutils-imap4d: Remotely exploitable format string vulnerability in 
SEARCH
 command
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 02:24:27 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.59.136.208
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond 
expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: mailutils-imap4d
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

A remotely exploitable format string vulnerability has been found in
GNU mailutils' imap4d server. Please see the iDefense advisory at
www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=303&type=vulnerabilities
for details, an exploit and a link to a patch.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 327424-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 11:08:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 04:08:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFV1h-0004g6-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:02:05 -0700
From: Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327424: fixed in mailutils 1:0.6.90-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:02:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: mailutils
Source-Version: 1:0.6.90-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mailutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libmailutils0-dev_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/libmailutils0-dev_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
libmailutils0_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/libmailutils0_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
mailutils-comsatd_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/mailutils-comsatd_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
mailutils-doc_0.6.90-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/mailutils-doc_0.6.90-3_all.deb
mailutils-imap4d_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/mailutils-imap4d_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
mailutils-mh_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/mailutils-mh_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
mailutils-pop3d_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/mailutils-pop3d_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
mailutils_0.6.90-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/mailutils_0.6.90-3.diff.gz
mailutils_0.6.90-3.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/mailutils_0.6.90-3.dsc
mailutils_0.6.90-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailutils/mailutils_0.6.90-3_i386.deb



A summary 

Bug#328244: gcc-h8300-hms: FTBFS: Unrecognized host system name i486-pc-linux-gnu-gnu.

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: gcc-h8300-hms
Version: 2.95.2.2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'gcc-h8300-hms' on i386/unstable,
I get the following error:

dh_testdir
#  configure gcc build for our cross target
/gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/src/configure --target=h8300-hitachi-hms 
--prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr/h8300-hitachi-hms --host=i486-pc-linux-gnu-gnu 
--enable-languages='c,c++' --enable-target-optspace --with-headers= --with-libs=
Invalid configuration `i486-pc-linux-gnu-gnu': machine `i486-pc-linux-gnu' not 
recognized
Invalid configuration `i486-pc-linux-gnu-gnu': machine `i486-pc-linux-gnu' not 
recognized
Unrecognized host system name i486-pc-linux-gnu-gnu.
make: *** [stamps/02-configure-stamp] Error 1


With the attached patch 'gcc-h8300-hms' can be compiled on unstable.

The patch also automatically updates config.guess/config.sub from
autotools-dev and adds support for compiling on amd64 and ppc64.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/control 2001-01-28 
07:28:45.0 +
+++ ./debian/control2005-09-14 05:22:06.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: devel
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Stephen M Moraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: dejagnu (>= 1.3-19990614), bzip2, binutils-h8300-hms (>= 
2.9.5.0.37), debhelper (>= 2), autoconf (>= 2.13), bison, flex, gettext, texinfo
+Build-Depends: autotools-dev, dejagnu (>= 1.3-19990614), bzip2, 
binutils-h8300-hms (>= 2.9.5.0.37), debhelper (>= 2), autoconf (>= 2.13), 
bison, flex, gettext, texinfo
 Standards-Version: 3.1.1
 
 Package: gcc-h8300-hms
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/rules   2001-01-28 
07:51:17.0 +
+++ ./debian/rules  2005-09-14 05:57:26.0 +
@@ -27,7 +27,13 @@
 
 CROSS_TOOL   := h8300-hitachi-hms
 #  attempt at being platform independent...
-CONFIG_HOST  := ${DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU}-pc-${DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM}-gnu
+CONFIG_HOST  := ${DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU}-pc-${DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM}
+ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU),powerpc64)
+CONFIG_HOST  := powerpc-pc-${DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM}
+endif
+ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU),x86_64)
+CONFIG_HOST  := i486-pc-${DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM}
+endif
 
 srcdir := $(pwd)/src
 stampdir   := stamps
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/rules.unpack 
./debian/rules.unpack
--- ../tmp-orig/gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/rules.unpack2001-01-06 
07:55:01.0 +
+++ ./debian/rules.unpack   2005-09-14 05:21:53.0 +
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
esac
mv $(gcc_srcdir)/src .
rmdir $(gcc_srcdir)
+   cp /usr/share/misc/config.{guess,sub} src
echo "$(gcc_tarball) unpacked." > $@
 
 .PHONEY: unpack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.

[Sven Luther]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> 
> Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I 
> have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.

We would like the /proc/cpuinfo of both these machines, and the boot message
if possible.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327938: marked as done (celestia: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326567: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEy1e-0003Qn-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:50 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) 
  id 1EEy1Z-0002RU-Uo
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: celestia: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: celestia
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Hello,

  This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on
  libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package
  uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this
  library has moved to the libqt3-mt package.

  Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix
  this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts
  build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for
  all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package
  in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies
  are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate
  the Qt/KDE transition to testing.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html

  Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If
  that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it
  may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the
  correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's
  CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm,
  m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail.

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking!
  

  P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for
  this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the
  bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the
  opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I
  apologize for the inconvenience.


---
Received: (at 327938-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 11:29:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 04:29:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFVSX-000616-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:29:49 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) 
  id 1EFVSV-0004Pq-C6
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:29:47 +0200
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:29:47 +0200
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (at 326567-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 09:48:31 +
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFTrA-0005Wv-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
From: Mathias Weyland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326567: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:29:47 +0200
Delivered-To

Bug#327619: python-gnome2: missing dependency, gnome.canvas not functional

[Sebastien Bacher]

Le lundi 12 septembre 2005 à 21:57 +0200, Yann Dirson a écrit :

> I infer from your questions that you cannot reproduce ?


No, and we would already have a bunch of dups if pygtk was broken, that
seems to be specific to your installation.

> FWIW, a search for _gtk on the output of "strace -efile -f" (with some
> context, since all 3 matches are grouped) shows:
> 
> 6718  stat64("/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk", 0xbfffba2c) 
> = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> 6718  open("/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so", 
> O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 6
> 6718  fstat64(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=168, ...}) = 0
> 6718  open("/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so", O_RDONLY) 
> = 7
> 6718  fstat64(7, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=168, ...}) = 0
> 6718  stat64("/usr/lib/python2.3/encodings/utf_8", 0xbfffad4c) = -1 ENOENT 
> (No such file or directory)

Seems to be ok. Does a "import gtk._gtk" work? If not what does it say?


Cheers,

Sebastien Bacher

Bug#327870: kernel-patch-grsecurity2: New glibc packages break compatibility with grsec

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:18:22PM +0200, Roman Medina wrote:
> Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software

> Grsec patch is incompatible with glibc post-v.2.3.2.

I don't think that's actually true.  From what I can tell, what happens
is that glibc now enforces requests for an executable stack, and bails
immediately at startup rather than risking a failure sometime later when
one or more libraries has requested an executable stack.

> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/08/msg00747.html

This post describes a correct workaround, pending resolution of the bugs 
in libgcrypt, libcrypt, etc.

> http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?t=1152

This thread doesn't seem to include posts from anyone who actually has a
clue about the nature of the bug, or who has tried to file bug reports
with Debian about it (other than the original poster).  It does,
however, include posts from at least one known troll.

To the best of my knowledge, there are only a handful of significant
libraries in Debian which have this bug; they should be fixed, but there
is a known workaround for those applications which require an executable
stack.

This is not a glibc bug; there is no bug in *reporting* the kernel error
when a library's request for an executable stack cannot be honored, and
it is not glibc's job to decide which executable stack requests are
legitimate and which are not.

It is not a kernel-patch-grsecurity2 bug; grsec is working as
advertised, and requires you to manually enable executable stack for any
applications you wish to grant it to.

Unless you can show that the workaround for some reason doesn't work for
you, I think this bug should be closed.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#328260: osgcal: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'RadixUserSW*' to 'int' loses precision

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: osgcal
Version: 0.1.32-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'osgcal' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:

 x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./include -DSUPPORT_GIF_HLS 
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-Wall -g -O2 -MT Model.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Model.Tpo -c src/osgCal/Model.cpp  
-fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/Model.o
src/osgCal/Model.cpp: In function 'std::string convertProxyName(const 
std::string&)':
src/osgCal/Model.cpp:284: warning: comparison is always false due to limited 
range of data type
src/osgCal/Model.cpp: In member function 'void 
osgCal::Model::fixNormalSW(float)':
src/osgCal/Model.cpp:2121: error: cast from 'RadixUserSW*' to 'int' loses 
precision
make[3]: *** [Model.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/osgcal-0.1.32'

With the attached patch 'osgcal' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/osgcal-0.1.32/include/osgCal/Model ./include/osgCal/Model
--- ../tmp-orig/osgcal-0.1.32/include/osgCal/Model  2005-09-04 
19:44:23.0 +
+++ ./include/osgCal/Model  2005-09-14 12:37:16.0 +
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@
 class RadixFloatItem {
 public:
float   value;
-   int user;
+   longuser;
 };
 
 class FloatRadix {
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/osgcal-0.1.32/src/osgCal/Model.cpp ./src/osgCal/Model.cpp
--- ../tmp-orig/osgcal-0.1.32/src/osgCal/Model.cpp  2005-09-08 
07:40:45.0 +
+++ ./src/osgCal/Model.cpp  2005-09-14 12:36:35.0 +
@@ -2118,7 +2118,7 @@
 user->readNormal = readNormals[k];
 
 items[iv].value = user->calVertex->position.x;
-items[iv].user = (int) user;
+items[iv].user = (long) user;
 iv++;
   }
 }


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: close

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> close 301327
Bug#301327: php4-idn: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327896: marked as done (php4-idn: idn.so is stored in the wrong directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327896: fixed in php4-idn 1.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 19:55:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 12:55:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vserver.edelhost.de [83.137.103.1] (b0pKSGDq)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEuOg-0005BC-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:55:22 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by vserver.edelhost.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC770C34796;
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:55:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from el-presidente.edelhost.de (el-presidente.edelhost.de 
[82.82.102.165])
by vserver.edelhost.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1529DC34795;
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:55:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by el-presidente.edelhost.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A404404F;
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:55:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by el-presidente.edelhost.de (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 49C024406E; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:55:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Pascal Volk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: php4-idn: idn.so is stored in the wrong directory
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:55:10 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at vserver.edelhost.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: php4-idn
Version: 1.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The php4-extension idn.so is stored in /usr/lib/php4/20050606, but php4's
(4.3.10-15) API-Extension is 20020429 (/usr/lib/php4/20020429).
When the Apache web server is starting, it prints the following message:

Starting web server: apachePHP Warning:  Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic
library '/usr/lib/php4/20020429/idn.so' - /usr/lib/php4/20020429/idn.so: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0

Workaround: Create a symlink
`cd /usr/lib/php4/20020429/`
`ln -s ../20050606/idn.so .

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages php4-idn depends on:
ii  libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi-2 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libidn11 0.5.18-1GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  php4-cli [phpapi-20020918]   4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p

php4-idn recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 327896-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 13:10:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 06:10:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFWtp-0005UU-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:02:05 -0700
From: Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327896: fixed in php4-idn 1.1-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:02:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: php4-idn
Source-Version: 1.1-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
php4-idn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

php4-idn_1.1-6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/php4-idn/php4-idn_1.1-6.dsc
php4-idn_1.1-6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/php4-idn/php4-idn_1.1-6.tar.gz
php4-idn_1.1-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4-idn/php

Bug#327870: kernel-patch-grsecurity2: New glibc packages break compatibility with grsec

[Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez]

Hello,

Thanks for your response, Steve. It sounds very logical to me. Anyway,
I've cc'ed spender (grsec developper). It would be interesting if he
could add his comments here in this ticket since he's perhaps the more
capable person to answer grsec issues. Perhaps he can refute some of
your arguments :)

If not, the workaround could be ok for me and you could close this
ticket but first let's wait for Brad's answer, please. Apart from this,
do you have a list of libraries/packages that should be fixed? Because
somebody would have to file tickets for those packages, I guess. I'd do
by myself but I'm not a grsec nor Debian expert :-(

Regards,
-Roman


Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:18:22PM +0200, Roman Medina wrote:
> 
>>Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
>>Severity: critical
>>Justification: breaks unrelated software
> 
> 
>>Grsec patch is incompatible with glibc post-v.2.3.2.
> 
> 
> I don't think that's actually true.  From what I can tell, what happens
> is that glibc now enforces requests for an executable stack, and bails
> immediately at startup rather than risking a failure sometime later when
> one or more libraries has requested an executable stack.
> 
> 
>>http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/08/msg00747.html
> 
> 
> This post describes a correct workaround, pending resolution of the bugs 
> in libgcrypt, libcrypt, etc.
> 
> 
>>http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?t=1152
> 
> 
> This thread doesn't seem to include posts from anyone who actually has a
> clue about the nature of the bug, or who has tried to file bug reports
> with Debian about it (other than the original poster).  It does,
> however, include posts from at least one known troll.
> 
> To the best of my knowledge, there are only a handful of significant
> libraries in Debian which have this bug; they should be fixed, but there
> is a known workaround for those applications which require an executable
> stack.
> 
> This is not a glibc bug; there is no bug in *reporting* the kernel error
> when a library's request for an executable stack cannot be honored, and
> it is not glibc's job to decide which executable stack requests are
> legitimate and which are not.
> 
> It is not a kernel-patch-grsecurity2 bug; grsec is working as
> advertised, and requires you to manually enable executable stack for any
> applications you wish to grant it to.
> 
> Unless you can show that the workaround for some reason doesn't work for
> you, I think this bug should be closed.
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325209: marked as done (rezound: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'void*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325209: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2005 20:28:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 26 13:28:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c203066.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.66] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E8koZ-0007L4-00; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:28:39 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E8koX-0005bq-Ng; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:28:37 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rezound: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'void*' to 'unsigned int' loses 
precision
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:28:37 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rezound
Version: 0.12.0beta-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'rezound' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:

In file included from ../backend/Generate/GenerateActions.h:26,
 from CMainWindow.cpp:746:
../backend/Generate/CGenerateNoiseAction.h:58:5: warning: #warning this should 
be defined by the selection, or give the user a choice
CMainWindow.cpp:1439:2: warning: #warning ??? make this an action?
../backend/AStatusComm.h:59: warning: 'class AStatusComm' has virtual functions 
but non-virtual destructor
CMainWindow.cpp: In member function 'long int 
CMainWindow::onKeyboardShuttle(FX::FXObject*, FX::FXSelector, void*)':
CMainWindow.cpp:1837: error: cast from 'void*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision
CMainWindow.cpp:1843: error: cast from 'void*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision
make[3]: *** [CMainWindow.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/rezound-0.12.0beta/build-tree/rezound-0.12.0beta/src/frontend_fox'

With the attached patch 'rezound' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/rezound-0.12.0beta/debian/patches/06_amd64_gcc4.patch 
./debian/patches/06_amd64_gcc4.patch
--- ../tmp-orig/rezound-0.12.0beta/debian/patches/06_amd64_gcc4.patch   
2005-08-26 19:49:37.0 +
+++ ./debian/patches/06_amd64_gcc4.patch2005-08-26 19:49:01.0 
+
@@ -61,3 +61,22 @@

if(repeatTypeComboBox->getCurrentItem()==0)
{ // repeating it a given number of times
+diff -urN ../rezound-0.12.0beta/src/frontend_fox/CMainWindow.cpp 
rezound-0.12.0beta/src/frontend_fox/CMainWindow.cpp
+--- ../rezound-0.12.0beta/src/frontend_fox/CMainWindow.cpp 2005-08-26 
19:28:49.0 +
 rezound-0.12.0beta/src/frontend_fox/CMainWindow.cpp2005-08-26 
19:39:22.0 +
+@@ -1834,13 +1834,13 @@
+ 
+   if(pos==0 && FXSELID(sel)==ID_SHUTTLE_BACKWARD)
+   {
+-  if((unsigned)ptr > 1/*came from keyboard event*/) 
enableAutoRepeat(getApp()->getDisplay(),false); // QQQ
++  if((unsigned long)ptr > 1/*came from keyboard event*/) 
enableAutoRepeat(getApp()->getDisplay(),false); // QQQ
+   shuttleDial->setValue(pos-inc);
+   onShuttleChange(sender,sel,ptr);
+   }
+   else if(pos==0 && FXSELID(sel)==ID_SHUTTLE_FORWARD)
+   {
+-  if((unsigned)ptr > 1/*came from keyboard event*/) 
enableAutoRepeat(getApp()->getDisplay(),false); // QQQ
++  if((unsigned long)ptr > 1/*came from keyboard event*/) 
enableAutoRepeat(getApp()->getDisplay(),false); // QQQ
+   shuttleDial->setValue(pos+inc);
+   onShuttleChange(sender,sel,ptr);
+   }

---
Received: (at 325209-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 13:18:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 06:18:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFX8M-0003Uw-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
From: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325209: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Admin

Bug#325952: marked as done (depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325952: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 21:38:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 14:38:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.201] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAaHo-0004uN-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:38:24 -0700
Received: (qmail 52172 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 21:37:54 -
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.216.211 
with login)
  by smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 21:37:54 -
Received: by triplehelix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 12AEC2A95DA; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rezound
Severity: serious

Hello,

If you're receiving this message, you have a package that depends on one
of the FLAC libraries (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++.)
Once again, the SONAME of the libraries has increased due to an API
transition and you must rebuild your packages.

Please briefly review the upstream API changelog at:

http://flac.sourceforge.net/changelog.html

to check if any of the API changes affect your FLAC-depending package.
In most cases, a simple rebuild will be sufficient to transition. If you
like, you can version the libflac-dev, libflac++-dev, liboggflac-dev,
or liboggflac++-dev build-dependency to (>= 1.1.2-1) to ensure that your
package is autobuilt against the new versions of the libraries.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the transition.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you.

-- 
Joshua Kwan

---
Received: (at 325952-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 13:18:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 06:18:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFX8M-0003Uy-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
From: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325952: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: rezound
Source-Version: 0.12.2beta-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rezound, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rezound_0.12.2beta-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1.diff.gz
rezound_0.12.2beta-1.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1.dsc
rezound_0.12.2beta-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1_i386.deb
rezound_0.12.2beta.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rezound 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:57:13 +0200
Source: rezound
Binary: rezound
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.12

Bug#327985: marked as done (openmosixview: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327985: fixed in openmosixview 1.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEy28-0003Sp-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:21 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) 
  id 1EEy1d-0002TK-Dz
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openmosixview: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openmosixview
Version: 1.5-7
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Hello,

  This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on
  libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package
  uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this
  library has moved to the libqt3-mt package.

  Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix
  this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts
  build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for
  all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package
  in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies
  are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate
  the Qt/KDE transition to testing.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html

  Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If
  that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it
  may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the
  correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's
  CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm,
  m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail.

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking!
  

  P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for
  this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the
  bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the
  opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I
  apologize for the inconvenience.


---
Received: (at 327985-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 13:18:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 06:18:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFX8K-0003UM-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:04 -0700
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327985: fixed in openmosixview 1.5-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: openmosixview
Source-Version: 1.5-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openmosixview, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openmosixview_1.5-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openmosixview/openmosixview_1.5-8.diff.gz
openmosixview_1.5-8.dsc
  to pool/main/o/o

Bug#328153: marked as done (rezound: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328153: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 21:33:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 14:33:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFIOv-0004kU-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:33:14 -0700
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:211:9ff:feed:c498])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EFIOu-0006Vo-SW; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:33:12 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EFIOu-0006gO-FH; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:33:12 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rezound: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:33:12 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rezound
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

rezound fails to build because it build-depends on xlibmesa-dev, which
is not available anymore. Please change this build-dependency to
libglu1-xorg-dev


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc7-amd64
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 328153-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 13:18:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 06:18:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFX8M-0003V0-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
From: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328153: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: rezound
Source-Version: 0.12.2beta-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rezound, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rezound_0.12.2beta-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1.diff.gz
rezound_0.12.2beta-1.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1.dsc
rezound_0.12.2beta-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1_i386.deb
rezound_0.12.2beta.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rezound 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:57:13 +0200
Source: rezound
Binary: rezound
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.12.2beta-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 327981 pending
Bug#327981: kpsk: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328200: [debian-ntp] Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

[Bdale Garbee]

On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 00:03 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:

> The maintainers should have a chance to clear up this question first.

I'll have a look at it today.

Bdale



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328271: eric: fail to start

[Eliyahu Sandler]

Package: eric
Version: 3.7.1+3.7.2-rc2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

When I start eric I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]1$ eric
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/eric/modules/eric3.py", line 15, in ?
  from qt import QTextCodec, SIGNAL, SLOT, qApp
  ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/qt.so: undefined
  symbol: _ZTI11QMotifStyle

I tried apt-get dist-upgade, but it did not help.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages eric depends on:
ii  bicyclerepair 0.9-3  A refactoring tool for python
ii  python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-qt33.15-3 Qt3 bindings for Python (default v
ii  python-qtext  3.15-3 Qt extensions for PyQt (default ve

Versions of packages eric recommends:
pn  eric-api-files (no description available)
pn  python-kde3(no description available)
pn  python-profiler(no description available)
pn  python-xml (no description available)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328121: Linuxsampler license

[Göran Weinholt]

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
[...]
> The problem is that the README in linuxsampler says the following thing:
> 
> "This software is distributed under the GNU General Public License (see
> COPYING file), and may not be used in commercial applications without
> asking the authors for permission."

I agree that this is inconsistent as written, but I think it's likely
that upstream meant to write "proprietary" instead of "commercial".
Simply explaining the difference to them should be enough to make them
change the wording. See this essay for an explanation of the difference:

http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/words-to-avoid.html#Commercial

> In addition there's a conflict between linuxsampler's aim to be an
> opensource software, and the license used. Restricting commercial use
> makes the software nonopensource by OSI definition and nonfree by Free
> Software Foundation's Free Software definition.

I think upstream only meant to make it clear to developers of
proprietary software that they need to ask for a special license if
they don't want to follow the GPL.

Regards,

-- 
Göran Weinholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer, sysadmin, netadmin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#328238: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on s390/experimental

[Mike Hommey]

forwarded 328238 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249579
thanks

Could you try to build with one of the tricks given on the upstream bug
report ? We will add the corresponding workaround in debian/rules

Cheers

Mike

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
> 
> Bits from the build-log:
> 
> > make[5]: Entering directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall'
> > make[6]: Entering directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/public'
> > make[6]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/public'
> > make[6]: Entering directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src'
> > xptcall.cpp
> > c++ -o xptcall.o -c -I../../../../dist/include/system_wrappers -include 
> > ../../../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API 
> > -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" -DOSARCH=\"Linux\" -DBUILD_ID=2005091410 
> > -DEXPORT_XPTC_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM -D_IMPL_NS_BASE   
> > -I../../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../../dist/include 
> > -I../../../../dist/include/nspr -I/usr/include -I/usr/include 
> > -I/usr/include-fPIC   -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion 
> > -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth 
> > -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -fshort-wchar 
> > -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -pipe -w -O2   -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include 
> > ../../../../mozilla-config.h -Wp,-MD,.deps/xptcall.pp xptcall.cpp
> > rm -f libxptcall.a
> > ar cr libxptcall.a xptcall.o  
> > ranlib libxptcall.a
> > /build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/config/nsinstall -R -m 
> > 644 libxptcall.a ../../../../dist/lib
> > make[7]: Entering directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md'
> > make[8]: Entering directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix'
> > xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp
> > c++ -o xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.o -c 
> > -I../../../../../../dist/include/system_wrappers -include 
> > ../../../../../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" 
> > -DOSARCH=\"Linux\" -DBUILD_ID=2005091410 -DEXPORT_XPTC_API   
> > -I../../../../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../../../../dist/include 
> > -I../../../../../../dist/include/nspr -I/usr/include -I/usr/include 
> > -I/usr/include -I../../../../../../dist/sdk/include -I./../..-fPIC   
> > -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align 
> > -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor 
> > -Wno-long-long -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -pipe -w 
> > -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-inline -fomit-frame-pointer -mbackchain   
> > -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../../../../mozilla-config.h 
> > -Wp,-MD,.deps/xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.pp xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp
> > xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp: In function 'nsresult 
> > XPTC_InvokeByIndex(nsISupports*, PRUint32, PRUint32, nsXPTCVariant*)':
> > xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp:248: error: can't find a register in class 
> > 'ADDR_REGS' while reloading 'asm'
> > make[8]: *** [xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.o] Error 1
> > make[8]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix'
> > make[7]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[7]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md'
> > make[6]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[6]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src'
> > make[5]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[5]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall'
> > make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[4]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect'
> > make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[3]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom'
> > make[2]: *** [tier_2] Error 2
> > make[2]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg'
> > make[1]: *** [default] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg'
> > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> 
> Full build-log is availible at
> http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=mozilla-firefox&ver=1.4.99%2B1.5beta1.dfsg-1&arch=s390&stamp=1126693125&file=log&as=raw
> 
> Greetings
> Martin
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#328238: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on s390/experimental

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 328238 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249579
Bug#328238: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on s390/experimental
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to 
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249579.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325959: marked as done (depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325959: fixed in hydrogen 0.9.2final-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 21:38:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 14:38:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.205] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAaHq-0004uV-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:38:26 -0700
Received: (qmail 49713 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 21:37:55 -
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.216.211 
with login)
  by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 21:37:55 -
Received: by triplehelix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 082F82A9565; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: hydrogen
Severity: serious

Hello,

If you're receiving this message, you have a package that depends on one
of the FLAC libraries (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++.)
Once again, the SONAME of the libraries has increased due to an API
transition and you must rebuild your packages.

Please briefly review the upstream API changelog at:

http://flac.sourceforge.net/changelog.html

to check if any of the API changes affect your FLAC-depending package.
In most cases, a simple rebuild will be sufficient to transition. If you
like, you can version the libflac-dev, libflac++-dev, liboggflac-dev,
or liboggflac++-dev build-dependency to (>= 1.1.2-1) to ensure that your
package is autobuilt against the new versions of the libraries.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the transition.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you.

-- 
Joshua Kwan

---
Received: (at 325959-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 14:19:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 07:19:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFY4O-0003GN-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:17:04 -0700
From: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325959: fixed in hydrogen 0.9.2final-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: hydrogen
Source-Version: 0.9.2final-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hydrogen, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

hydrogen_0.9.2final-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.2final-1.diff.gz
hydrogen_0.9.2final-1.dsc
  to pool/main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.2final-1.dsc
hydrogen_0.9.2final-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.2final-1_i386.deb
hydrogen_0.9.2final.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.2final.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated hydrogen 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:00:21 +0200
Source: hydrogen
Binary: hydrogen
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.2fina

Bug#328182: stk: FTBFS on m68k

[Guenter Geiger]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Package: stk
> Version: 4.2.0-7
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
>
> Build log is at:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=stk&ver=4.2.0-7&arch=m68k&stamp=1123315454&file=log&as=raw
>
> GCC segfaults.  Good luck tracking it down given the state of GCC on m68k. :-(

:) and given that I don't have access to a m68k machine. Anyhow, I will
just guess and lower the optimization.

Guenter

>
> You could try a lower optimization level (than -O3).  If that fails you
> could also try using gcc 3.4.
>
>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328276: freewheeling: it does not start.

[Arnault Teissier]

Package: freewheeling
Version: 0.5pre4-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Freewheeling crashs when it starts, with the following error :
 ...
 binding: input 'key'
 -condition 'key' == 307 [rightalt]
   -> output 'set-variable'
 -set 'var' = 'VAR_keyheld_alt'[0]
 -set 'value' = 'keydown'
CONFIG: Starting with (640,480) resolution.
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0x08130700 ***
Aborted
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

Any clues?

Regards,

Arnault


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages freewheeling depends on:
ii  jackd 0.100.0-4  JACK Audio Connection Kit (server 
ii  libasound21.0.9-3ALSA library
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfluidsynth 1.0.6-3Real-time MIDI software synthesize
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-6  GCC support library
ii  libgnutls12   1.2.6-1the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjack0.100. 0.100.0-4  JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari
ii  libogg0   1.1.2-1Ogg Bitstream Library
ii  libsdl-gfx1.2 2.0.9-4drawing and graphical effects exte
ii  libsdl-ttf2.0 2.0.6-5ttf library for Simple DirectMedia
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++64.0.1-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libvorbis0a   1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisenc2 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxml2   2.6.21-1   GNOME XML library
ii  ttf-bitstream 1.10-3 The Bitstream Vera family of free 
ii  ttf-dustin20030517-1 Various TrueType fonts from dustis
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m

freewheeling recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324054: marked as done (FTBFS: Can't read libasound.la)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324054: fixed in swami 0.9.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2005 01:14:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 18:14:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6Hvs-Q9-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:14:00 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7K1DxTV046405
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E6A9H-00010S-KH
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:55:19 -0700
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:55:19 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Can't read libasound.la
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1034/Thu Aug 18 13:07:58 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR"
Content-Disposition: inline


--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: swami
Version: 0.9.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

swami fails to build because it can't read libasound.la:

> /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=3Dlink cc  -g -g -Wall -O2 -Wall   -o wavetb=
l_fluidsynth.la -rpath /usr/lib/swami -module -avoid-version  wavetbl_fluid=
synth_la-wavetbl_fluidsynth.lo wavetbl_fluidsynth_la-wavetbl_fluidsynth_gui=
=2Elo -lfluidsynth   -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgm=
odule -lgthread -lglib -lpthread -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm=20
> grep: /usr/lib/libasound.la: No such file or directory
> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libasound.la: No such file or directory
> libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libasound.la' is not a valid libtool archive

This file is contained in libasound2-dev.  The attached patch adds
this package to the list of build-dependencies, which fixes the build.

--=20
Matt

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -u swami-0.9.2/debian/control swami-0.9.2/debian/control
--- swami-0.9.2/debian/control
+++ swami-0.9.2/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: sound
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), cdbs, bzip2, libsndfile1-dev, libgtk1=
=2E2-dev, pkg-config, libfluidsynth-dev, libpopt-dev, libpng-dev, ladcca-de=
v, libjack-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), cdbs, bzip2, libsndfile1-dev, libgtk1=
=2E2-dev, pkg-config, libfluidsynth-dev, libpopt-dev, libpng-dev, ladcca-de=
v, libjack-dev, libasound2-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1.1
=20
 Package: swami
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- swami-0.9.2.orig/swami-0.9.2.tar.bz2.cdbs-config_list
+++ swami-0.9.2/swami-0.9.2.tar.bz2.cdbs-config_list
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+swami-0.9.2/src/include/config.h.in
+swami-0.9.2/intl/config.charset
+swami-0.9.2/config.guess
+swami-0.9.2/config.rpath
+swami-0.9.2/config.sub

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--

--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDBg72fNdgYxVXvBARAv3SAJ9vf3+rCbxMSzalcjnQuxpsQqdgEgCglLkL
djkP4b8A71/Qtm2cBzYj12c=
=xeVk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq--

---
Received: (at 324054-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 15:08:15 +

Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

[Shaun Jackman]

2005/9/13, Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 05-Sep-13 15:09, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > Does the package actually run and work this way? If so, I'll simply
> > apply your patch. Although, it is admittedly a bit of a hack.
> 
> It _is_ a hack. I did not really check it intensively, but basically the
> package seems to work with it. However, a real fix of the problem would
> of course be much better.
> 
> Regards
> Andreas Jochens

Barring cries of outrage then, I'll apply your patch. Thanks! To make
grepping easier, I think I'll typedef a jintptr_t type and use that.

Cheers,
Shaun

Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.

[Bastian Blank]

severity 328242 important
merge 328242 319986
thanks

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
> Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I 
> have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.

Read the old bugreports. This is a known problem without solution.

Bastian

-- 
Star Trek Lives!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 328242 important
Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac 
G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.
Severity set to `important'.

> merge 328242 319986
Bug#319986: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64 fails on dual G5 PowerMac7,3
Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac 
G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `package' don't match:
 #319986 has `linux-2.6';
 #328242 has `linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

[Michael Koch]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:18:48AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> 2005/9/13, Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 05-Sep-13 15:09, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > > Does the package actually run and work this way? If so, I'll simply
> > > apply your patch. Although, it is admittedly a bit of a hack.
> > 
> > It _is_ a hack. I did not really check it intensively, but basically the
> > package seems to work with it. However, a real fix of the problem would
> > of course be much better.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Andreas Jochens
> 
> Barring cries of outrage then, I'll apply your patch. Thanks! To make
> grepping easier, I think I'll typedef a jintptr_t type and use that.


UURGH, NO. This will break SWT on 32 bit archs - if it works on 64 bit archs at 
all.

You cannont compare normal C code with JNI C code. JNI C code has much higher 
restrictions.



Cheers,
Michael
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327987: marked as done (picwiz: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327987: fixed in picwiz 0.3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEy28-0003Sq-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:21 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) 
  id 1EEy1d-0002TL-E7
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: picwiz: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: picwiz
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Hello,

  This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on
  libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package
  uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this
  library has moved to the libqt3-mt package.

  Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix
  this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts
  build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for
  all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package
  in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies
  are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate
  the Qt/KDE transition to testing.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html

  Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If
  that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it
  may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the
  correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's
  CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm,
  m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail.

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking!
  

  P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for
  this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the
  bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the
  opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I
  apologize for the inconvenience.


---
Received: (at 327987-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 15:38:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 08:38:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFZF1-0004wT-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:32:07 -0700
From: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327987: fixed in picwiz 0.3.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:32:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: picwiz
Source-Version: 0.3.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
picwiz, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

picwiz_0.3.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/picwiz/picwiz_0.3.1-2.diff.gz
picwiz_0.3.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/p/picwiz/picwiz_0.3.1-2.dsc
picwiz_0.3.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/picwiz/picwiz_0.3.1-2_i3

Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

[Shaun Jackman]

2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> UURGH, NO. This will break SWT on 32 bit archs - if it works on 64 bit archs 
> at all.
> 
> You cannont compare normal C code with JNI C code. JNI C code has much higher 
> restrictions.

There's that cry of outrage! Hehe. Are there any 32-bit architectures
where int is not synonymous with long? The patch I plan on applying
follows. Incidentally, this worked just fine on i386, tested with
swingwtdemo as a native gcj application, and with Azureus using the
Sun JVM.

Cheers,
Shaun

--- swt-gtk-3.1.orig/xpcom.cpp
+++ swt-gtk-3.1/xpcom.cpp
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
 
  extern "C" {
 
+typedef long jintptr_t; // For 64 bit architectures.
+
  #define XPCOM_NATIVE(func) Java_org_eclipse_swt_internal_mozilla_XPCOM_##func
 
  #ifndef NO_Call
@@ -141,7 +143,7 @@
 {
jint rc = 0;
XPCOM_NATIVE_ENTER(env, that, PR_1Malloc_FUNC);
-   rc = (jint)PR_Malloc(arg0);
+   rc = (jintptr_t)PR_Malloc(arg0);
XPCOM_NATIVE_EXIT(env, that, PR_1Malloc_FUNC);
return rc;
 }
@@ -1868,7 +1870,7 @@
 {
jint rc = 0;
XPCOM_NATIVE_ENTER(env, that, nsEmbedCString_1get_FUNC);
-   rc = (jint)((nsEmbedCString *)arg0)->get();
+   rc = (jintptr_t)((nsEmbedCString *)arg0)->get();
XPCOM_NATIVE_EXIT(env, that, nsEmbedCString_1get_FUNC);
return rc;
 }
@@ -1880,7 +1882,7 @@
 {
jint rc = 0;
XPCOM_NATIVE_ENTER(env, that, nsEmbedCString_1new___FUNC);
-   rc = (jint)new nsEmbedCString();
+   rc = (jintptr_t)new nsEmbedCString();
XPCOM_NATIVE_EXIT(env, that, nsEmbedCString_1new___FUNC);
return rc;
 }
@@ -1894,7 +1896,7 @@
jint rc = 0;
XPCOM_NATIVE_ENTER(env, that, nsEmbedCString_1new___3BI_FUNC);
if (arg0) if ((lparg0 = env->GetByteArrayElements(arg0, NULL)) ==
NULL) goto fail;
-   rc = (jint)new nsEmbedCString((const char *)lparg0, arg1);
+   rc = (jintptr_t)new nsEmbedCString((const char *)lparg0, arg1);
  fail:
if (arg0 && lparg0) env->ReleaseByteArrayElements(arg0, lparg0, 0);
XPCOM_NATIVE_EXIT(env, that, nsEmbedCString_1new___3BI_FUNC);
@@ -1930,7 +1932,7 @@
 {
jint rc = 0;
XPCOM_NATIVE_ENTER(env, that, nsEmbedString_1get_FUNC);
-   rc = (jint)((nsEmbedString *)arg0)->get();
+   rc = (jintptr_t)((nsEmbedString *)arg0)->get();
XPCOM_NATIVE_EXIT(env, that, nsEmbedString_1get_FUNC);
return rc;
 }
@@ -1942,7 +1944,7 @@
 {
jint rc = 0;
XPCOM_NATIVE_ENTER(env, that, nsEmbedString_1new___FUNC);
-   rc = (jint)new nsEmbedString();
+   rc = (jintptr_t)new nsEmbedString();
XPCOM_NATIVE_EXIT(env, that, nsEmbedString_1new___FUNC);
return rc;
 }
@@ -1956,7 +1958,7 @@
jint rc = 0;
XPCOM_NATIVE_ENTER(env, that, nsEmbedString_1new___3C_FUNC);
if (arg0) if ((lparg0 = env->GetCharArrayElements(arg0, NULL)) ==
NULL) goto fail;
-   rc = (jint)new nsEmbedString(lparg0);
+   rc = (jintptr_t)new nsEmbedString(lparg0);
  fail:
if (arg0 && lparg0) env->ReleaseCharArrayElements(arg0, lparg0, 0);
XPCOM_NATIVE_EXIT(env, that, nsEmbedString_1new___3C_FUNC);
@@ -2008,7 +2010,7 @@
 {
jint rc = 0;
XPCOM_NATIVE_ENTER(env, that, nsID_1new_FUNC);
-   rc = (jint)new nsID();
+   rc = (jintptr_t)new nsID();
XPCOM_NATIVE_EXIT(env, that, nsID_1new_FUNC);
return rc;
 }

Bug#328102: marked as done (mac-fdisk: FTBFS (powerpc): debian/rules uses 'dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture' which does not work with newer dpkg)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328102: fixed in mac-fdisk 0.1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 12:44:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 05:44:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c158233.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.158.233] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFA9g-0008MH-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:44:56 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EFA9e-0008Jh-QL; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:44:54 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mac-fdisk: FTBFS (powerpc): debian/rules uses 'dpkg 
--print-gnu-build-architecture' which does not work with newer dpkg
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:44:54 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: mac-fdisk
Version: 0.1-12
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'mac-fdisk' on powerpc/unstable,
I get the following error:

dh_fixperms: Compatibility levels before 3 are deprecated.
find debian/mac-fdisk-cross  -print0 2>/dev/null | xargs -0r chown 
--no-dereference 0:0
find debian/mac-fdisk-cross ! -type l  -print0 2>/dev/null | xargs -0r 
chmod go=rX,u+rw,a-s
find debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/share/doc -type f  ! -regex 
'debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/share/doc/[^/]*/examples/.*' -print0 2>/dev/null | 
xargs -0r chmod 644
find debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/share/doc -type d  -print0 2>/dev/null 
| xargs -0r chmod 755
find debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/share/man 
debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/man/ debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/X11*/man/ -type f  
-print0 2>/dev/null | xargs -0r chmod 644
find debian/mac-fdisk-cross -perm -5 -type f \( -name '*.so*' -or -name 
'*.la' -or -name '*.a' \)  -print0 2>/dev/null | xargs -0r chmod 644
find debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/include  -type f -name '*.h'  -print0 
2>/dev/null | xargs -0r chmod 644
find debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/lib/perl5 
debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/share/perl5 -type f -perm -5 -name '*.pm'  -print0 
2>/dev/null | xargs -0r chmod a-X
dh_installdeb: Compatibility levels before 3 are deprecated.
install -o 0 -g 0 -d debian/mac-fdisk-cross/DEBIAN
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at 
/usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 643.
dh_shlibdeps: Compatibility levels before 3 are deprecated.
dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/mac-fdisk-cross.substvars 
debian/mac-fdisk-cross/usr/sbin/mac-fdisk
dh_gencontrol: Compatibility levels before 3 are deprecated.
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at 
/usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 643.
dpkg-gencontrol -pmac-fdisk-cross -ldebian/changelog -isp 
-Tdebian/mac-fdisk-cross.substvars -Pdebian/mac-fdisk-cross
dpkg-gencontrol: error: package mac-fdisk-cross not in control info
dh_gencontrol: command returned error code 65280
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1

This occurs because debian/rules uses 'dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture'
to set the BUILDARCH variable. The new dpkg version in unstable does
not support the '--print-gnu-build-architecture' parameter.

With the attached patch 'mac-fdisk' can be compiled on powerpc/unstable.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/mac-fdisk-0.1/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/mac-fdisk-0.1/debian/rules  2005-09-13 14:24:34.0 
+0200
+++ ./debian/rules  2005-09-13 14:24:26.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 export DH_VERBOSE=1
 
-BUILDARCH = $(shell dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture)
+BUILDARCH = $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU)
 POWERPC = $(findstring $(BUILDARCH),powerpc ppc64)
 
 packmn  = mac-fdisk

---
Received: (at 328102-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 15:48:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 08:48:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFZTV-0007Mj-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
From: Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-

Bug#328285: FTBFS on m68k

[Mike Furr]

Package: ladspa-sdk
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: serious

ladspa-sdk FTBFS on m68k due to an ICE[1]:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/ladspa-sdk-1.1/src'
cc -I. -O3 -fPIC -o plugins/amp.o -c plugins/amp.c
plugins/amp.c: In function '_init':
plugins/amp.c:314: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

m68k is known to particularly buggy on high optimization levels.  Many
packages have worked around this bug by using -O2 (the recommended
optimization flag anyway).

Cheers,
-Mike

1 -
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ladspa-sdk&ver=1.1-3&arch=m68k&stamp=1124660092&file=log&as=raw

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages ladspa-sdk depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-6  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++64.0.1-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

ladspa-sdk recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

[Michael Koch]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:52:00AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> 2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > UURGH, NO. This will break SWT on 32 bit archs - if it works on 64 bit 
> > archs at all.
> > 
> > You cannont compare normal C code with JNI C code. JNI C code has much 
> > higher restrictions.
> 
> There's that cry of outrage! Hehe. Are there any 32-bit architectures
> where int is not synonymous with long? The patch I plan on applying
> follows. Incidentally, this worked just fine on i386, tested with
> swingwtdemo as a native gcj application, and with Azureus using the
> Sun JVM.

You replace jint (which is garanteed to be 32 bit) with long which dont has 
this garantee.
Why dont you just build the native sources that upstream supplies for 64 bit 
systems?
That is what I do in the eclipse build works very fine. BTW: My Eclipse 
packages are ready
to replace your SWT. When you give me your okay I can imidiately upload it to 
the archive
(via some sponsor). I think this would be the easiest solution at all.


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328286: Intend to NMU: rebuild against latest transitionned libs

[Loïc Minier]

Package: zinf
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi,

 zinf is currently uninstallable.

 Because of the C++ transition, zinf needs to be rebuilt against the
 current libc6-dev, libartsc0-dev, libmusicbrainz4-dev,
 libid3-3.8.3-dev.  All of these are built on all arches, so you don't
 need to version the build-depends, you simply need to rebuild.

 Because of the Xorg transition, zinf needs to build-depend on x-dev
 (ui/zinf/unix/src/GTKUtility.cpp #includes X11/Xatom.h) instead of
 xlibs-dev.  Upstream should use AC_PATH_X or AC_PATH_XTRA to configure
 X libs and cflags.

 I think you don't need to build-depend on liborbit2-dev at all, but you
 do need to build-depend on liborbit-dev because you call automake
 during your build process.  This is bad style and pulls too many
 build-dependencies.  The same goes for libxosd-dev.

 Because you do not --enable-experimental, you do not need to
 build-depend on libgtkmm2.0-dev, and you should not have to
 build-depend on libboost-dev but this looks like an upstream bug.

 Unless you object, I will upload packages with the attached changes
 tomorrow.

Bye,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come, your destiny awaits!
--- zinf-2.2.5/debian/changelog
+++ zinf-2.2.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+zinf (2.2.5-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * C++ transition: rebuild against current libc6-dev, libartsc0-dev,
+libmusicbrainz4-dev, and libid3-3.8.3-dev.
+  * Xorg transition: build-depend on x-dev instead of xlibs-dev.  (Upstream
+uses X11/Xatom.h in ui/zinf/unix/src/GTKUtility.cpp but does not check for
+X11 development files in configure.ac with AC_PATH_X or AC_PATH_XTRA).
+  * Drop useless liborbit2-dev and libgtkmm2.0-dev build dependencies.
+
+ -- Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:52:51 +0200
+
 zinf (2.2.5-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Applied patch which fixes excessive memory consumtion when compiling
--- zinf-2.2.5/debian/control
+++ zinf-2.2.5/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), cdbs (>= 0.4.5.3), automake1.8, autoconf, 
libtool, autotools-dev, liborbit-dev, libxosd-dev, libglib2.0-dev, 
libgtk2.0-dev, liborbit2-dev, libncurses5-dev, xlibs-dev, libesd0-dev, 
libartsc0-dev, libasound2-dev [alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel 
powerpc s390 sparc amd64], nasm [i386], libmusicbrainz4-dev, libid3-3.8.3-dev, 
libvorbis-dev (>= 1.0.0), libgdbm-dev, zlib1g-dev, libgtkmm2.0-dev, libboost-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), cdbs (>= 0.4.5.3), automake1.8, autoconf, 
libtool, autotools-dev, liborbit-dev, libxosd-dev, libglib2.0-dev, 
libgtk2.0-dev, libncurses5-dev, libesd0-dev, libartsc0-dev, libasound2-dev 
[alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc amd64], nasm 
[i386], libmusicbrainz4-dev, libid3-3.8.3-dev, libvorbis-dev (>= 1.0.0), 
libgdbm-dev, zlib1g-dev, x-dev, libboost-dev
 
 Package: zinf
 Architecture: any

Bug#328159: mutt-ng: cannot modify system mail spool, says: Mailbox is read-only.

[Elimar Riesebieter]

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Miernik told:

> Package: mutt-ng
> Version: 0.0+20050831-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> After upgrading 0.0+20050728-1 -> 0.0+20050831-1 muttng is unable to
> modify my system mail spool /var/mail/miernik

Please do as root chmod g+s /usr/bin/muttng_dotlock and chown
root:mail /usr/bin/muttng_dotlock. Will be fixed next upload.

Elimar


-- 
  "Talking much about oneself can also 
   be a means to conceal oneself."
 -Friedrich Nietzsche


pgpUzt1sNKbJA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#328042: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328042: fixed in chromium 0.9.12-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 06:15:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 23:15:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF44N-0004PR-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:15:03 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8D6F13M036616
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EErh5-uT-UP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:02:12 -0700
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:02:11 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gr/z0/N6AeWAPJVB"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1080/Mon Sep 12 19:02:46 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--gr/z0/N6AeWAPJVB
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F"
Content-Disposition: inline


--IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: chromium
Version: 0.9.12-9
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

chromium fails to build because it has an unsatisfiable
build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev:

>  -> Considering  xlibmesa-dev
>-> Trying xlibmesa-dev
>-> Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow:
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another pack=
age.
> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> is only available from another source
> However the following packages replace it:
>   xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev

Replacing this build-dependency with "xlibmesa-gl-dev |
libglu1-xorg-dev" fixes the problem.

--=20
Matt

--IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -u chromium-0.9.12/debian/control chromium-0.9.12/debian/control
--- chromium-0.9.12/debian/control
+++ chromium-0.9.12/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: games
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libsdl1.2-dev (>=3D 1.2.2-3.1), libsm=
peg-dev, libopenal-dev, libglpng-dev, xlibmesa-dev, dpatch
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libsdl1.2-dev (>=3D 1.2.2-3.1), libsm=
peg-dev, libopenal-dev, libglpng-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libglu1-xorg-dev, d=
patch
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2.0
=20
 Package: chromium

--IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F--

--gr/z0/N6AeWAPJVB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDJbSTfNdgYxVXvBARAs3BAJ9hIYMdSYSXw0kQLUmQCTHQoWVZRACfch6B
pcfVQMfb/d4Uv5waAQux2OA=
=eN0q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--gr/z0/N6AeWAPJVB--

---
Received: (at 328042-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 16:49:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 09:49:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFaPa-0005F1-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:47:06 -0700
From: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328042: fixed in chromium 0.9.12-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:47:06 -0700
Delive

Bug#323556: bittorrent: No such package...

[Vincent Lönngren]

Package: bittorrent
Version: 3.4.2-5
Followup-For: Bug #323556

Now it seems there is no libwxgtk-python-like package at all. :(

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages bittorrent depends on:
ii  python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o

Versions of packages bittorrent recommends:
ii  mime-support  3.35-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327983: marked as done (kwavecontrol: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327983: fixed in kwavecontrol 0.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEy28-0003Sm-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:21 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) 
  id 1EEy1d-0002Sx-9K
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kwavecontrol: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kwavecontrol
Version: 0.3-5
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Hello,

  This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on
  libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package
  uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this
  library has moved to the libqt3-mt package.

  Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix
  this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts
  build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for
  all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package
  in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies
  are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate
  the Qt/KDE transition to testing.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html

  Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If
  that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it
  may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the
  correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's
  CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm,
  m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail.

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking!
  

  P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for
  this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the
  bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the
  opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I
  apologize for the inconvenience.


---
Received: (at 327983-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 17:38:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 10:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFb79-00051u-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:32:07 -0700
From: Morten Hustveit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327983: fixed in kwavecontrol 0.3-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:32:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: kwavecontrol
Source-Version: 0.3-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kwavecontrol, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kwavecontrol_0.3-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kwavecontrol/kwavecontrol_0.3-7.diff.gz
kwavecontrol_0.3-7.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kwavecontrol/kwavecontrol_0.3-7.dsc
kwavecontr

Bug#328200: [debian-ntp] Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

[Bdale Garbee]

On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 00:03 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:

> The maintainers should have a chance to clear up this question first.

Ok, I've just been through the ntp source tree looking at all the
copyright and license assertions.  Executive summary is that there are
indeed some problems, but it's not bad, and I believe it can be fixed
with an upload that elides certain bits from the upstream sources and
makes one small change in the source code.

Here's what I found...

The contents of the ElectricFence subdirectory are GPL, redundant with
the Debian packages, and comletely unused.  Since we have to elide the
upstream source anyway, we could clip this tree, or we could leave it
and add a suitable content to debian/copyright.

The file util/ansi2knr.c is also GPL.  I'm pretty sure it's unused, but
an easy reference in debian/copyright would cover it.

The contents of the adjtimed subdirectory and a few files scattered
around the rest of the tree are copyright by Tai Jin, with a unique
license that is clearly DFSG-ok.  I suggest we add suitable content to
debian/copyright taken from adjtimed/adjtimed.c.

The arlib subdirectory contents are non-free, but only relevant if
configure is called with the --with-arlib option that we don't use.  I
suggest this be elided from the upstream source for the Debian source
package.

The file html/build/hints/solaris-dosynctodr.html appears to have been
taken from a sun.com web page complete with links to a license assertion
on Sun web content that I don't even want to read.  We should remove
this file from our source package.

The files in html/pic include a couple of small images of products that
I presume came from manufacturer web sites, which are used to illustrate
the documentation.  No explicit assertions of copyright or license.  I
believe this is fair use, but if not they could be replaced with an icon
or something and nothing important would be lost.

The file include/global.h has an RSA copyright assertion with "all
rights reserved" and no other grant.  However, the files that include it
clearly came from the rsaref2.0 package, which has a BSD-like license
with advertising clause.  I believe this header file also was part of
that package and therefore covered by the same RSA license terms.
Therefore, I suggest the copyright and license terms from libntp/md5c.c
should be added to debian/copyright to cover all inclusions from
rsaref2.0.

There are several files that are BSD with advertising clause, including
libntp/memmove.c, libntp/mktime.c, libntp/random.c, libntp/strerror.c,
libntp/strstr.c, ntpd/refclock_jupiter.c, and ntpd/refclock_mx4200.c.
These should be referenced in debian/copyright.

There are several files that are BSD-like with advertising clause
(several different copyright holders), including libntp/md5c.c
(mentioned above), libntp/ntp_rfc2553.c, ntpd/refclock_jjy.c,
ntpd/refclock/palisade.c, ntpd/refclock_ripencc.c,
ntpd/refclock_ulink.c, scripts/ntpsweep.in, and all of the sntp subdir
(which I believe is unused).  These should also be referenced in
debian/copyright.

The file libntp/ranny.c is non-free, with a unique copyright and license
assertion:

  /*
   * Random number generator is:
   *
   *  Copyright 1988 by Rayan S. Zachariassen, all rights reserved.
   *  This will be free software, but only when it is finished.
   *
   * Used in ntp by permission of the author.  If copyright is
   * annoying to you, read no further.  Instead, look up the reference,
   * write me an equivalent to this and send it back to me.
   */

  /*
   * Random number generator; see Knuth Vol 2. 2nd ed. p.27 
   * (section 3.2.2)
   */

There is exactly one use of the ranp2() function defined in this file,
which appears in ntpd/ntp_peer.c.  I don't have Knuth nearby, but
staring at the source, this looks like a pseudo-randum generator that as
called is returning an unsigned long containing a random number in the
bottom 16 bits.  Since all it is being used for is to initialize an
association ID, I don't see why we couldn't replace the call to
init_random() in ntp/ntpd.c with a call to srand(time()), and then
replace ranp2(16) in ntpd/ntp_peer.c with rand() & 0x?  That would
allow us to elide libntp/ranny.c and the references to it in
libntp/Makefile* from our source package, which is probably easier than
finding the author and asking him to relicense this bit.

That's it.  The rest looks fine to me.

Bdale



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322306: bbpager: Bug reproduced

[Stan Vasilyev]

Package: bbpager
Version: 0.3.1-5
Followup-For: Bug #322306

I was able to reproduce this bug on my system using both XFree86 and
XOrg servers. bbpager seems to be incompatible with blackbox 0.70 and
higher. It works fine with fluxbox.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages bbpager depends on:
ii  blackbox 0.70.0-5Window manager for X
ii  fluxbox  0.9.11-1Highly configurable and low resour
ii  libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.1-2   GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.6-7   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-6  X Window System client libraries m

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327741: tetex-optional: undistributable files included in package

[Hilmar Preusse]

On 13.09.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:

Hi,

> > .  And below we find the conditions you quoted. I'll contact Tim
> > if we can patch the files and replace the lines above by
> > something like:
> > 
> > "see sem-read.me.gz for copyright conditions"
> > 
> > . Is that acceptable? teTeX 2.0 was released under 1.2 but AFAIK
> > this is OK for sarge. etch will have teTeX 3.0 and LPPL 1.3. The
> > same wording we still have in 3.0.
> 
> yeah, that sounds good.  whether this should affect sarge for a
> point-release i think is worth pinging debian-release, i guess.
> 
Is this really RC? Now that we know that the license statement inside
the files are wrong and they are really LPPL:
Can't we simply downgrade the bug to importand, change the
description to "license statement in the files of seminar package is
wrong" and then forward that bug to upstream (TE)?

Regards,
  Hilmar
-- 
sigmentation fault


pgpzwtxMgqz5d.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#328199: pytables: rebuild required for hdf5 migration

[Francesc Altet]

Hi Russ,

I'm the maintainer of the package, but I'm not a developer. Normally,
I package pytables and who used to be my sponsor (Daniel Bungert)
upload it to the Debian repository.

However, Daniel seems to be very busy lately (in fact, he said me that
he was about to leave his developer position at debian) and despite
I'd like to become a Debian developer, I don't like bureaucracy ;). So
I'm afraid that my ideal position would be remaining a maintainer and
find another sponsor. Another solution would be to find a developer
wanting to take in charge of the package.

Meanwhile, updated versions of pytables for Debian are accessible at:

http://pytables.sourceforge.net/Debian/

In addition, I'm going to subscribe the mentors.debian.net service in
order to make the package more broadly accessible.

Cheers,

A Dimecres 14 Setembre 2005 07:14, Russ Allbery va escriure:
> Package: pytables
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> The current pytables packages depend on hdf5 1.6.2, which has been
> replaced by hdf5 1.6.4.  In order to complete the hdf5 transition,
> pytables must be rebuilt against the current libraries.  No changes
> to the source package should be required; all that should be needed
> is a new upload to force a rebuild.
>
> Please try to do this soon, as the hdf5 (and lam and mpich)
> transition has gotten rather complex.  Thank you!
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
> C)

-- 
>0,0<   Francesc Altet     http://www.carabos.com/
V   V   Cárabos Coop. V.   Enjoy Data
 "-"

Bug#326903: marked as done (python2.4_2.4.1-4(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:17:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326903: fixed in python2.4 2.4.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 14:15:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 07:15:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) 
[216.78.168.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECeEN-0004d4-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:15:23 -0700
Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2])
by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886501778E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  6 Sep 2005 09:15:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1])
by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF0035B2E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  6 Sep 2005 09:15:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 02732-02 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:15:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105)
id 87EA8361DD; Tue,  6 Sep 2005 09:15:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 129551303B6; Tue,  6 Sep 2005 09:11:49 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:11:49 -0500
From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: python2.4_2.4.1-4(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: python2.4
Version: 2.4.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid


python2.4 fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.


A full buildd log is available at 


Other buildd logs may be available at 


--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
Received: (at 326903-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 18:18:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 11:18:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFbon-0006WX-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:17:13 -0700
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326903: fixed in python2.4 2.4.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:17:13 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: python2.4
Source-Version: 2.4.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python2.4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

idle-python2.4_2.4.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/python2.4/idle-python2.4_2.4.1-5_all.deb
python2.4-dbg_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
  to pool/main/p/python2.4/python2.4-dbg_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
python2.4-dev_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
  to pool/main/p/python2.4/python2.4-dev_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
python2.4-doc_2.4.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/python2.4/python2.4-doc_2.4.1-5_all.deb
python2.4-examples_2.4.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/python2.4/python2.4-examples_2.4.1-5_all.deb
python2.4-gdbm_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
  to pool/main/p/python2.4/python2.4-gdbm_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
python2.4-minimal_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
  to pool/main/p/python2.4/python2.4-minimal_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
python2.4-tk_2.4.1-5_hppa.deb
  to pool/main/p/python2.4/python

Bug#328309: passwd.1.gz is provided in new passwd package. Please remove it from manpages-es-extra

[Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias]

Package: manpages-es-extra
Version: 0.8a-13
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi!

when trying to install passwd 3:4.0.12-1 from experimental, 
dpkg claims: 

dpkg: error al procesar
/var/cache/apt/archives/passwd_1%3a4.0.12-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/es/man1/passwd.1.gz', que está
 también en el paquete manpages-es-extra

I think this bug should be reported to this package, but it is 
clear that the bug will have no solution until new passwd package 
reaches sid.

Thanks and keep the great work,

Emilio

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

manpages-es-extra depends on no packages.

Versions of packages manpages-es-extra recommends:
ii  manpages-es   1.55-3 Spanish man pages

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327619: python-gnome2: missing dependency, gnome.canvas not functional

[Yann Dirson]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:25:08PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Does a "import gtk._gtk" work? If not what does it say?

Bingo.  That module import fails when DISPLAY is not set or invalid,
which means the configure test for gnome.canvas in gcompris will fail
on buildd's.

Now is there another way than "import" to check that gnome.canvas is
available and works to some extent, or is it really a bug in gtk._gtk ?

$ python
Python 2.3.5 (#2, Aug 30 2005, 14:49:31) 
[GCC 4.0.2 20050821 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-6)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import gtk._gtk
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in ?
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py", line 37, in ?
from _gtk import *
RuntimeError: could not open display
>>> 

Best regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
|  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327741: tetex-optional: undistributable files included in package

[Sean Finney]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > yeah, that sounds good.  whether this should affect sarge for a
> > point-release i think is worth pinging debian-release, i guess.
> > 
> Is this really RC? Now that we know that the license statement inside
> the files are wrong and they are really LPPL:
> Can't we simply downgrade the bug to importand, change the
> description to "license statement in the files of seminar package is
> wrong" and then forward that bug to upstream (TE)?

no complaints from me...

sean


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: severity #328159

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity #328159 important
Bug#328159: mutt-ng: cannot modify system mail spool, says: Mailbox is 
read-only.
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328059: marked as done (mailcrypt: FTBFS: /bin/bash: ./configure: Permission denied)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328059: fixed in mailcrypt 3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 08:23:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 01:23:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c158233.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.158.233] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF64I-00073Y-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:23:06 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EF64G-0001of-Hm; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:23:04 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mailcrypt: FTBFS: /bin/bash: ./configure: Permission denied
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:23:04 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: mailcrypt
Version: 3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-1
Severity: serious

When building 'mailcrypt' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

eperl -P -o debian/templates debian/templates.in
test -f debian/rules
test -e ./configure || autoconf
./configure
/bin/bash: ./configure: Permission denied
make: *** [build] Error 126

Regards
Andreas Jochens


---
Received: (at 328059-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 18:42:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 11:42:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFc3I-0005lk-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Davide G. M. Salvetti)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328059: fixed in mailcrypt 3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: mailcrypt
Source-Version: 3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mailcrypt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mailcrypt_3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mailcrypt/mailcrypt_3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2.diff.gz
mailcrypt_3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mailcrypt/mailcrypt_3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2.dsc
mailcrypt_3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mailcrypt/mailcrypt_3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Davide G. M. Salvetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mailcrypt 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:53:06 +0200
Source: mailcrypt
Binary: mailcrypt
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Davide G. M. Salvetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Davide G. M. Salvetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 mailcrypt  - An Emacs interface to the GNU Privacy Guard
Closes: 328059
Changes: 
 mailcrypt (3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Urgency medium: Fixes a serious bug.
   * General overhaul of the debian directory.
   * bug.presubj, bug.script: New files.
   * control (Depends): Added "make".
   * install (do_install): Use "make".
   * preinst: Deleted.
   * rules.in (build): Ensure that "./configure" is executable; thanks to
 Andreas Jochens.  (Closes: #328059)
Files: 
 58ef1c5aa8140c6a

Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

[Shaun Jackman]

2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You replace jint (which is garanteed to be 32 bit) with long which dont has 
> this garantee.
> Why dont you just build the native sources that upstream supplies for 64 bit 
> systems?
> That is what I do in the eclipse build works very fine. BTW: My Eclipse 
> packages are ready
> to replace your SWT. When you give me your okay I can imidiately upload it to 
> the archive
> (via some sponsor). I think this would be the easiest solution at all.

I realise that long is not guaranteed to be 32-bit. In fact, that's
the very reason I'm using it, so that on 64-bit platforms it will be
wide enough to cast a pointer to long. The negative consequence of
changing (jint) to (long) is that on 64-bit architectures the pointer
will be cast to a 64-bit long, and then silently cast down to a 32-bit
jint. This second step is potentially lossy on a system that uses
addresses greater than 2^32 (4 GB). Although potentially hazardous,
this is how the package has been behaving with GCC 3 for some time.
So, I don't believe this patch is a regression, but merely returning
the package to status quo.

If it's possible to patch one source tree to work on all
architectures, I prefer that solution to using one source tree per
architecture, which quickly gets out of hand.

Cheers,
Shaun

Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

[Michael Koch]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> 2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You replace jint (which is garanteed to be 32 bit) with long which dont has 
> > this garantee.
> > Why dont you just build the native sources that upstream supplies for 64 
> > bit systems?
> > That is what I do in the eclipse build works very fine. BTW: My Eclipse 
> > packages are ready
> > to replace your SWT. When you give me your okay I can imidiately upload it 
> > to the archive
> > (via some sponsor). I think this would be the easiest solution at all.
> 
> I realise that long is not guaranteed to be 32-bit. In fact, that's
> the very reason I'm using it, so that on 64-bit platforms it will be
> wide enough to cast a pointer to long. The negative consequence of
> changing (jint) to (long) is that on 64-bit architectures the pointer
> will be cast to a 64-bit long, and then silently cast down to a 32-bit
> jint. This second step is potentially lossy on a system that uses
> addresses greater than 2^32 (4 GB). Although potentially hazardous,
> this is how the package has been behaving with GCC 3 for some time.
> So, I don't believe this patch is a regression, but merely returning
> the package to status quo.
> 
> If it's possible to patch one source tree to work on all
> architectures, I prefer that solution to using one source tree per
> architecture, which quickly gets out of hand.

I just dont get why you wanna patch when upstream has already did the work for 
you
and made SWT work on both types of platforms. And changing jint to long can 
cause
bugs that are really hard to debug.


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327360: python2.3-qt3: undefined symbol: _ZTI11QMotifStyle

[Christopher Martin]

For your information, the split-out of the Qt styles which is the cause of 
this problem will be reverted in the next upload of Qt, which will likely 
take place in a few days.

Cheers,
Christopher Martin


pgpWBkV12Ld2P.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#327741: (fwd) tetex-extra: undistributable files included in package

[Hilmar Preusse]

Dear Timothy, Sebastian and Denis,

The following bug report we got here down in the Debian Bug Tracking
system. I've pointed the submitter to sem-read.me, which clearly
says, that seminar can be distributed under LPPL.
He agreed that we should remove the confusing statement and replace
it by something senseful. Is there another seminar release planned in
the near future, should we patch our files or send the request to
do to Thomas Esser/TeX-Live team?

Kind Regards,
  Hilmar

- Forwarded message from Sean Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

From: Sean Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tetex-optional: undistributable files included in package
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:01:53 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
X-Mailing-List:  archive/latest/13170

Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1

i just happened to be browsing around in /usr/share and found the
following in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/seminar/xcomment.sty:

%% Copying of part or all of any file in the xcomment.sty package
%% is allowed under the following conditions only:
%% (1) You may freely distribute unchanged copies of the files. Please
%% include the documentation when you do so.
%% (2) You may modify a renamed copy of any file, but only for personal
%% use or use within an organization.
%% (3) You may copy fragments from the files, for personal use or for use
%% in a macro package for distribution, as long as credit is given
%% where credit is due.
%%
%% You are NOT ALLOWED to take money for the distribution or use of
%% these files or modified versions or fragments thereof, except for
%% a nominal charge for copying etc.

i don't know how many other latex-included files have copyrights
like this, but it is definitely not okay...

- End forwarded message -

-- 
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/#206401 http://counter.li.org


pgp7zs3kIsrIJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Version tracking didn't work out

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 318285
Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> tag 318285 woody sarge
Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: woody, sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328078: marked as done (unshield: FTBFS: aclocal: command not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:08:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #328078: unshield: FTBFS: aclocal: command not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 10:02:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 03:02:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-082-083-116-046.arcor-ip.net (gleep.earth.sol) 
[82.83.116.46] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF7cx-0008Rr-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:02:59 -0700
Received: from cts by gleep.earth.sol with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EF7cw-0006UD-6T
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:02:58 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: unshield: FTBFS: aclocal: command not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:02:58 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: unshield
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious

Automatic build of unshield_0.5-2 on garkin by sbuild/m68k 42
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), zlib1g-dev (>= 1.2.1)
[...]
dh_clean 
 debian/rules build
chmod +x bootstrap
./bootstrap
Creating configure.ac...done.
Creating unshield.spec...done.
+ aclocal -I m4
./bootstrap: line 44: aclocal: command not found
make: *** [config.status] Error 127

See full build log at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=unshield&vers=0.5-2

Christian

---
Received: (at 328078-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 19:08:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 12:08:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cm58-122.liwest.at (fast.homenet) [212.33.58.122] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFcc7-eL-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:08:11 -0700
Received: from fast.homenet ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by fast.homenet (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8EJ884f023116
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:08:08 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
by fast.homenet (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8EJ87JX023115
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:08:07 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: fast.homenet: voc set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
using -f
From: Volker Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Inst. f. Praktische Informatik
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: #328078: unshield: FTBFS: aclocal: command not found
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:08:06 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 149985



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328327: libdb2: doesn't have postrm with ldconfig

[Lars Wirzenius]

Package: libdb2-dev
Version: 2:2.7.7.0-10
Severity: serious
Justification: Clint said it's serious on irc 

libdb2 doesn't seem to have a postrm script that would run ldconfig,
meaning that after libdb2-dev is installed, and libdb2, libdb2-util, and
libdb2-dev are removed, there is a /usr/lib/libdb2.so.2 dangling symlink
on the filesystem. Running ldconfig manually fixes this.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328328: kaffe-pthreads: jar systematically throws NullPointerException

[Yann Dirson]

Package: kaffe-pthreads
Version: 2:1.1.5-cvs20050808-2
Severity: grave

In the sid chroot on escher:

$ /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/bin/jar
Internal error: caught an unexpected exception.
Please check your CLASSPATH and your installation.
java/lang/NullPointerException
   at gnu.classpath.SystemProperties.getProperty (SystemProperties.java:134)
   at java.lang.ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoaderUrls (ClassLoader.java:1031)
   at java.lang.ClassLoader.defaultGetSystemClassLoader (ClassLoader.java:1060)
   at java.lang.VMClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader (VMClassLoader.java:339)
   at java.lang.ClassLoader$StaticData. (ClassLoader.java:161)
Aborted



-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
|  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

[Shaun Jackman]

2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just dont get why you wanna patch when upstream has already did the work 
> for you
> and made SWT work on both types of platforms. And changing jint to long can 
> cause
> bugs that are really hard to debug.

Simply because maintaining two source trees and the patches for each
source tree is more difficult and error prone than maintaining one
source tree.

Cheers,
Shaun

Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

[Michael Koch]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:40:54PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> 2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I just dont get why you wanna patch when upstream has already did the work 
> > for you
> > and made SWT work on both types of platforms. And changing jint to long can 
> > cause
> > bugs that are really hard to debug.
> 
> Simply because maintaining two source trees and the patches for each
> source tree is more difficult and error prone than maintaining one
> source tree.

I see your problems. ;-)

Somehow I dont had such problems at all with the whole eclipse tree which 
includes
the complete SWT too. It seems your package creates more headaches then 
necessary.


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327741: (fwd) tetex-extra: undistributable files included in package

[Sebastian Rahtz]

If Timothy is listening, and is happy, the best solution would
be to patch the file on CTAN. I can get that done, but best
to give TVZ time to respond.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz  
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 322306 confirmed
Bug#322306: bbpager fails to start under blackbox and fluxbox (possibly others)
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: confirmed

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322236: fbi / exif soname bump

[Moritz Muehlenhoff]

Hi,
fbi only requires a re-compile to fix this bug. I've tried it and
I can verify that it works without problems.

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324030: SWT on 64-bit OSs

[Billy Biggs]

  Hi, I just got pointed at this bug, I am a developer on the SWT
project.

  The issue here is that in Java memory we need to store pointers to C
objects.  jint is 32 bits, jlong is 64 bits, by the Java spec.  To keep
memory use down, we decided to have the Java and C code for 64-bit GTK+
ports be generated by a preprocessing stage.

  Here's how it's done.  In the SWT sources, whenever we have a pointer,
we add some markup like this:

   int /*long*/ selection = OS.gtk_tree_view_get_selection (tree);

  The ant target "replace.32.to.64" in the build.xml for the GTK+ 64 bit
port does this search and replace on all of the SWT sources.

  The C source code must then be changed to match.  All of the C source
code in SWT is auto-generated by the JNIGeneratorApp from
org.eclipse.swt.tools.  The target "build.cfiles" in the build.xml runs
this to generate the C code.

  Please don't use hacky patches.  We've done the work to do the real
64-bit port, and I can help out if you're having trouble.  If you just
patch the C files and not the Java source code, you're just going to get
weird crashes when some pointers turn out to be invalid.

  -Billy



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327994: The package FTBFS anyway

[Christian Perrier]

Dato suggested rebuilding this package to have it follow the KDE
transition.

However, trying to do so (because I wanted to give it a try), I
failed:

/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX i486-linux-gnu-g++  
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W 
-Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -O2 -Wformat-security 
-Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common-o 
kcm_ksynaptics.la -rpath /usr/lib/kde3 -module -avoid-version -L/usr/lib 
-L/usr/share/qt3/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib-no-undefined -Wl,--no-undefined 
-Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined ksynaptics.lo synconfigwidget.lo myframe.lo 
touchpad.lo adjborderwizard.lo synconfigwidgetbase.lo adjborderwizardbase.lo 
synconfig.lo -lkdeui
.libs/touchpad.o: In function `TouchPad::setCoastingEnabled(bool)':
touchpad.cpp:(.text+0xcb9): undefined reference to 
`TouchPad::coastingSpeedThreshold'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [kcm_ksynaptics.la] Erreur 1
make[4]: Leaving directory 
`/home/bubulle/src/debian/ksynaptics/ksynaptics-0.2.0/ksynaptics/src'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/home/bubulle/src/debian/ksynaptics/ksynaptics-0.2.0/ksynaptics'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/home/bubulle/src/debian/ksynaptics/ksynaptics-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** [all] Erreur 2
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/bubulle/src/debian/ksynaptics/ksynaptics-0.2.0'
make: *** [build-stamp] Erreur 2
debuild: fatal error at line 765:
dpkg-buildpackage failed!
You have mail in /home/bubulle/Mail/Inbox


I have no clue for solving thisso I will just give up..:-)


-- 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328364: incorrect debian/copyright file

[Ana Guerrero]

Package: cabber
Version: 0.4.0-test5-2
Severity: serious



The debian/copyright file doesn't make sense, it says:

--

Copyright:

Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU Trueprint comes with NO WARRANTY,
to the extent permitted by law.
You may redistribute copies of GNU Trueprint
under the terms of the GNU General Public License.

Online available at:

http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html

On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
Public License can be found in '/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.

--


It seems that a part of the debian/copyright file has been copied and 
pasted from the trueprint package debian/copyright file. 
The trueprint package has nothing to do with cabber package.

Please set properly the copyright holder.




__ 
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! 
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad 
http://correo.yahoo.es


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327741: (fwd) tetex-extra: undistributable files included in package

[Timothy Van Zandt]

That would be excellent of you. Thanks Sebastian. Of course, all these 
are just obsolete attempts at copyleft notices and I'm happy to have 
whatever is the current norm substituted.


tim


Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

If Timothy is listening, and is happy, the best solution would
be to patch the file on CTAN. I can get that done, but best
to give TVZ time to respond.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328192: FTBFS: Missing sentinel in function call

[Paul Kuliniewicz]

*puts Upstream Developer hat on*

Rhythmbox Applet 0.1.8 is going to be released Real Soon Now (i.e., once
its translators have a chance to update their .po files), and it
includes a fix for this bug.  In the meantime, I can confirm that the
patch fixes the problem, and I have already made the same change to the
Arch repository.

The next release of RBA has a few build system changes that should help
prevent it from breaking like this when the libraries it uses get
upgraded.  I've learned that disabling deprecated APIs and treating
compiler warnings as errors work well for development, but not for a
released tarball that people just want to compile. :-)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Confirmed. Escalate severity.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 325120 grave
Bug#325120: package: libpam-ldap  "unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_ldap.so)"
Severity set to `grave'.

> end
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> This bug makes account access impossible for systems that rely upon
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> libpam-ldap for authentication.  I am also running in to this problem on
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> our systems.  The bug report is accurate as applied to sudo, passwd, and
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> other PAM-enabled applications.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Too many unknown commands, stopping here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311050: marked as done (Uninstallable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:45:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pgadmin3 back to an installable state.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2005 04:29:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 27 21:29:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dbsx4-00081R-00; Fri, 27 May 2005 21:29:34 -0700
Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com 
([2001:470:1f00:907:20d:87ff:fe3c:98c8] helo=ip6-localhost)
by polaris.galacticasoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dbsx3-0003yr-IS; Fri, 27 May 2005 23:29:33 -0500
Received: from adamm by ip6-localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dbsx4-ji-Od; Fri, 27 May 2005 23:29:34 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Uninstallable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 23:29:34 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,ONEWORD 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: pgadmin3
Severity: grave

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  pgadmin3: Depends: libwxgtk2.5.3 (>= 2.5.3.2) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages pgadmin3 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13   GCC support library
ii  libpq3  7.4.8-2  PostgreSQL C client library
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.6-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
pn  libwxgtk2.5.3Not found.
pn  pgadmin3-dataNot found.

---
Received: (at 310398-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 20:45:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 13:45:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay-am.club-internet.fr [194.158.104.67] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFe8X-0006Wk-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:45:45 -0700
Received: from [10.0.0.1] (d01v-212-194-200-32.d4.club-internet.fr 
[212.194.200.32])
by relay-am.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D4D25610;
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:45:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:45:42 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Enrici?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pgadmin3 back to an installable state.
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

pgAdmin III 1.2.2 has been uploaded to debian/unstable yesterday morning
and is now built against libwxgtk2.6-dev which solves the broken build-de=
p.

Please, note that the powerpc build failed. It seems to be due to
#325361 filed against libpango1.0-common. However pgadmin3 1.2.0-2.1 is
available for powerpc thanks to last week NMU from Lo=EFc Minier. m68k
fails too as libwxgtk2.6-dev has not been built yet on this particular ar=
ch.

Regards,
Rapha=EBl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310398: marked as done (pgadmin3 package appears to be broken in unstable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:45:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pgadmin3 back to an installable state.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2005 11:45:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 23 04:45:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web53610.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.43] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaAkA-0001g3-00; Mon, 23 May 2005 04:05:10 -0700
Received: (qmail 94709 invoked by uid 60001); 23 May 2005 11:04:39 -
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  
b=oSIIr5wUi8cpDWMjZjsKup0KFmGR1gsPSgMNtCj2LgCaQak9T+TbIFXA2wcgcNpmzNYpK2xbgPbYpT2S9Hz9OnIVc3fvS5+RwMfpLrrs/KTfkXBEYYFdN+fPs3U8ksIpCQcFk5FrjyDR/ivGfK65DyGBe0Ye5WxW3PV++zeTaKo=
  ;
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [64.81.205.42] by web53610.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 May 
2005 04:04:38 PDT
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 04:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: rds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pgadmin3 package appears to be broken in unstable
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: pgadmin3
Version: 1.2.0-2
Description: Graphical administration tool for PostgreSQL

pgadmin3 package appears to be broken in unstable. Thanks


# aptitude install --show-versions --simulate  pgadmin3/unstable
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree  
Reading extended state information  
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done  
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  pgadmin3: Depends: libwxgtk2.5.3 (>= 2.5.3.2) which is a virtual package. 

---





__ 
Yahoo! Mail Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail 

---
Received: (at 310398-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 20:45:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 13:45:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay-am.club-internet.fr [194.158.104.67] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFe8X-0006Wk-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:45:45 -0700
Received: from [10.0.0.1] (d01v-212-194-200-32.d4.club-internet.fr 
[212.194.200.32])
by relay-am.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D4D25610;
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:45:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:45:42 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Enrici?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pgadmin3 back to an installable state.
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

pgAdmin III 1.2.2 has been uploaded to debian/unstable yesterday morning
and is now built against libwxgtk2.6-dev which solves the broken build-de=
p.

Please, note that the powerpc build failed. It seems to be due to
#325361 filed against libpango1.0-common. However pgadmin3 1.2.0-2.1 is
available for powerpc thanks to last week NMU from Lo=EFc Minier. m68k
fails too as libwxgtk2.6-dev has not been built yet on this particular ar=
ch.

Regards,
Rapha=EBl