Processed: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 262395 grave
Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work

[Vincent Lefevre]

severity 262395 grave
thanks

The severity should be at least grave, as the upgrade breaks the
system, and so that the bug can be seen by apt-listbugs, as said
in bug #311425.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 311139

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 311139 sarge
Bug#311139: kernel-image-2.4.27-s390: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check

[Kenshi Muto]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

here is a proposed source package.

http://kmuto.jp/debian/crossfire/
7ea54b1ce30828e86d0695358f984665  crossfire_1.6.0.debian1-0.1.diff.gz
0d8a8b616651a5f9dd2b4dda0879ed3c  crossfire_1.6.0.debian1-0.1.dsc
1f23f20c049a836b025da64500099f43  crossfire_1.6.0.debian1.orig.tar.gz

Of course you can ignore this and create it by yourself :)

Thanks,
- -- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 

iEYEARECAAYFAkKda3cACgkQQKW+7XLQPLHezACcDbgXWdbP7M2zmSzD/S+NOsNk
MnoAoIJolL61E2H2jdzj1cS+SQ4AA7Lx
=9BVr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308783: marked as done (libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:47:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308783: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 11:00:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 04:00:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWBQB-00086o-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 04:00:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j4CAxuuB028320
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:59:56 +0200
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j4CAxLVc028102
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:59:32 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j4CAx6Lr028013
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:59:06 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:59:04 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libxpm4: problems with s_popen (CAN-2004-0914)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at irb.hr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libxpm4
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
Severity: grave
Justification: may allow access to the accounts of users who use the package

The CAN-2004-0914 patch introduced a s_popen() function as a safe
replacement for popen().  Instead of invoking a shell, it splits
arguments on whitespace and passes the command directly to execvp(3).
However, it doesn't handle quoting or redirection, so code like

  WrFFrI.c:339:   snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "gzip -q > \"%s\"", filename);
  WrFFrI.c:340:   if (!(mdata->stream.file = s_popen(buf, "w")))

results in a ">" argument and superfluous quotes:

  execve("/bin/gzip", ["gzip", ">", "\"foo.gz\""], [/* 19 vars */])

This completely breaks the transparent compression and decompression.

Furthermore, since gzip processes all arguments regardless of errors, an
attacker can use filenames with whitespace to compress arbitrary files:
(xpmtest taken from )

  # ./xpmtest crab.xpm 'fnord -v /etc/hosts.deny fnord.gz'
  w=28, h=28, cpp=2, cols=6, vmask=, hotspot=0,0
  gzip: >: No such file or directory
  gzip: "fnord: No such file or directory
  /etc/hosts.deny:   -50.0% -- replaced with /etc/hosts.deny.gz
  gzip: fnord.gz": No such file or directory

The above would effectively disable TCP wrappers.  The -r option can be
used to compress whole directory trees.

s_popen() also has issues with error handling, signals, and runaway
child processes.  All of this has been fixed in X11R6.8.2, though I
don't think they're aware of the security implications (patches at
 are still vulnerable).

Thanks,

Matej

---
Received: (at 308783-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 07:52:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 00:52:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdO1w-00076P-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:52:48 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdNxF-0001Rw-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:47:57 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#308783: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:47:57 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 

Bug#262395: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

[Roger Leigh]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> This is a followup for your report:
> http://bugs.debian.org/262395
>
> The report end up with :
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed.
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.efmt installed.
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
>> ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
>> ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
>> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing 
>> *** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW for details
>> dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
>
> the full error log is in the generated file . Here
> "/tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW". Could you post this file or if
> deleted rerun the upgrade process and send the new one .

Sorry, but I'm afraid that /tmp is tmpfs, and it was lost after
shutting down.  It succeeded later, and I've tried downgrading to -8
and upgrading again, and it now works fine.

So there's still a fault here which can cause errors on upgrades, but
I'm not sure what the cause is, or if it will affect woody upgrades.
I'll try purging all of tetex and trying again.


Thanks,
Roger

- -- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 

iD8DBQFCnXMdVcFcaSW/uEgRAr1dAJsFkd2rjGDfrolOMyYm+3A/jQJV+wCfesyR
pUfzDBrJ5+8Y8cGrJ7iOk3U=
=D1Rg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311482: apt-listbugs: Strange config file

[Andreas Tille]

Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.48
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1

Apt-listbugs stores the bugs it just listed in
 /etc/apt/listbugs/ignore_bugs
This results in a change in /etc after nearly every apt run which
definitely sucks.

Kind regards and thanks for maintaing apt-listbugs

 Andreas.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii  apt   0.5.28.6   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libdpkg-ruby1.8   0.3.1  modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii  libintl-gettext-ruby1.8   0.11-5 Gettext wrapper for Ruby 1.8
ii  libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8]  1.8.2-7Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-1Interface of expat for the scripti
ii  ruby  1.8.2-1An interpreter of object-oriented 

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 311482

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 311482 sarge-ignore
Bug#311482: apt-listbugs: Strange config file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311488: somaplayer was built with a broken libmad0

[Adrian Bunk]

Package: somaplayer
Version: 0.5.2-2
Severity: serious


somaplayer was built with a broken libmad0 on all archiectures
(see #310311).

This can lead to broken upgrades from woody.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#262395: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

[Roger Leigh]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:34:39AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> > This is a followup for your report:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/262395
> >
> > The report end up with :
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed.
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.efmt installed.
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
> >> ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> >> ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> >> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing 
> >> *** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW for details
> >> dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
> >
> > the full error log is in the generated file . Here
> > "/tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW". Could you post this file or if
> > deleted rerun the upgrade process and send the new one .
> 
> Sorry, but I'm afraid that /tmp is tmpfs, and it was lost after
> shutting down.  It succeeded later, and I've tried downgrading to -8
> and upgrading again, and it now works fine.
> 
> So there's still a fault here which can cause errors on upgrades, but
> I'm not sure what the cause is, or if it will affect woody upgrades.
> I'll try purging all of tetex and trying again.

No luck.  It reinstalled fine.


-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#309677: Please reupload for i386/amd64 only

[Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo]

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:35:55PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> could you please "fix" this by uploading the latest version of asc with
> the archs list trimmed down to i386 and amd64, the archs that seem
> officially supported by upstream, to t-p-u?

I'm not sure if it is possible to "fix" it this way. If some package was
released/built for all archs and then there are problems on one of them
then it is RC bug. Reuploading without problematic arch isn't considered as
a solution for this RC bug. 

But as I said I'm not sure about this.

> asc has been removed from Sarge for now and it seems quite silly to
> exclude a really well-made game from Sarge just because it has problems
> on a fringe architecture hardly anyone uses nowadays, while it's working
> for the two archs that cover at least 95% of the installed base. I've
> played the i386 version for quite some time and it's nowhere in a
> non-releasable state. It can than be ported to alpha in sid after Sarge
> has been released.

Yep it works great on i386 for me.

regards
fEnIo

-- 
  ,''`.  Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
 : :' :   32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland
 `. `'   phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user
   `-  http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#311488: Small correction to the description

[Adrian Bunk]

It's an indirect upgrade issue, since somaplayer can be installed on a 
partially upgraded system with the woody libmad0.

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 262395, severity of 262395 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 262395 unreproducible
Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
Tags were: sid sarge patch
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Tags added: unreproducible

> severity 262395 important
Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311263: marked as done (woody to sarge upgrade trigger 34 useless dpkg conffiles handling)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:17:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311263: fixed in snort 2.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2005 09:15:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 02:15:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lns-vlq-7-lil-82-254-203-17.adsl.proxad.net (yellowpig.yi.org) 
[82.254.203.17] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DcgN1-0006Zq-00; Mon, 30 May 2005 02:15:39 -0700
Received: from seventeen
([127.0.0.1] helo=yellowpig.yi.org ident=mail)
by yellowpig.yi.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DcgN0-00035Q-00; Mon, 30 May 2005 11:15:38 +0200
Received: (nullmailer pid 11866 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 30 May 2005 09:15:37 -
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:15:36 +0200
From: Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: woody to sarge upgrade trigger 34 useless dpkg conffiles handling
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: snort-rules-default
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: serious

Hello Javier,

When upgrading a pristine woody chroot with snort installed, and no
snort conffiles modified manually, upgrading snort-rules-default cause
dpkg to prompt conffiles handling for thirty-four (34) files. This is
more than the total for a standard upgrade to sarge when snort is not
installed.  But given that I did not modify any of them in the first
place even one would be too much.

See the log below. This is easy to reproduce:
1) debootstrap woody
2) apt-get install snort
3) retarget apt to sarge
4) apt-get install snort-common ( to work around #311257)

Apparenlty this is due to this line in snort-rules-default preinst:
mv /etc/snort/*.rules /etc/snort/rules/

This is not acceptable. If you do that, then you cannot mark the files
under /etc/snort/rules/... as conffiles anymore, you must handle them
with tool like ucf that can be instructed of the move.

Anyway, my opinion is those files are best placed in /usr/share with an
overriding in /etc as spamassassin do. 

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



Setting up snort-rules-default (2.3.2-2) ...

Configuration file `/etc/snort/classification.config'
 ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
 ==> File also in package provided by package maintainer.
   What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
  D : show the differences between the versions
  Z : background this process to examine the situation
 The default action is to keep your current version.
*** classification.config (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? 

Configuration file `/etc/snort/rules/attack-responses.rules'
 ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
 ==> File also in package provided by package maintainer.
   What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
  D : show the differences between the versions
  Z : background this process to examine the situation
 The default action is to keep your current version.
*** attack-responses.rules (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? 

Configuration file `/etc/snort/rules/backdoor.rules'
 ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
 ==> File also in package provided by package maintainer.
   What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
  D : show the differences between the versions
  Z : background this process to examine the situation
 The default action is to keep your current version.
*** backdoor.rules (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? 

Configuration file `/etc/snort/rules/bad-traffic.rules'
 ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
 ==> F

Bug#311257: marked as done (snort: Files conflict with woody snort-common)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:17:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311257: fixed in snort 2.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2005 08:35:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 01:35:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lns-vlq-7-lil-82-254-203-17.adsl.proxad.net (yellowpig.yi.org) 
[82.254.203.17] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DcfkV-0002eg-00; Mon, 30 May 2005 01:35:51 -0700
Received: from seventeen
([127.0.0.1] helo=yellowpig.yi.org ident=mail)
by yellowpig.yi.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DcfkT-00032J-00; Mon, 30 May 2005 10:35:49 +0200
Received: (nullmailer pid 11673 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 30 May 2005 08:35:45 -
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 10:35:44 +0200
From: Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: snort: Files conflict with woody snort-common
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: snort
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: serious

Hello Javier,

When attempting a woody to sarge upgrade, dpkg fails with:

dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/snort_2.3.2-2_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/etc/ppp/ip-down.d/snort', which is also in package 
snort-common

snort, snort-mysql, snort-pgsql needs to Replaces: sort-common

Here the log:

Preparing to replace snort 1.8.4beta1-3.1 (using .../snort_2.3.2-2_i386.deb) 
...Stopping Network Intrusion Detection System: snort.
Unpacking replacement snort ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/snort_2.3.2-2_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/etc/ppp/ip-down.d/snort', which is also in package 
snort-common
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
dpkg: regarding .../snort-common_2.3.2-2_all.deb containing snort-common:
 snort-common conflicts with snort (<< 2.3.2-2)
  snort (version 1.8.4beta1-3.1) is installed.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/snort-common_2.3.2-2_all.deb 
(--unpack):
 conflicting packages - not installing snort-common
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/snort_2.3.2-2_i386.deb
 /var/cache/apt/archives/snort-common_2.3.2-2_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


---
Received: (at 311257-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 10:21:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 03:21:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdQLr-0006sL-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:21:31 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdQHe-00085K-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:17:10 -0400
From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311257: fixed in snort 2.3.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:17:10 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: snort
Source-Version: 2.3.2-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
snort, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

snort-common_2.3.2-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-common_2.3.2-3_all.deb
snort-doc_2.3.2-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-doc_2.3.2-3_all.deb
snort-mysql_2.3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-mysql_2.3.2-3_i386.deb
snort-pgsql_2.3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-pgsql_2.3.2-3_i386.deb
snort-rules-default_2.3.2-3_all.deb
  to pool/m

Bug#311492: zope-stripogram: Postinst script fails if zope2.7 is installed

[Igor Stroh]

Package: zope-stripogram
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The postinst script assumes that there's a /etc/init.d/zope
which is not there, since zope2.7 is installed:

Setting up zope-stripogram (1.4-1) ...
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/zope not found.
dpkg: error processing zope-stripogram (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 100
Errors were encountered while processing:
 zope-stripogram
W: No priority (or zero) specified for pin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Cheers,
Igor


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-muaddib.0
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages zope-stripogram depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.49 Debian configuration management sy
ii  zope2.7 [zope]2.7.5-2Open Source Web Application Server

-- debconf information:
  zope-stripogram/oldproduct_in_var: do nothing


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306840: quagga: I_WANT_SSL does not --enable-snmp

[Christoph Kluenter]

Package: quagga
Version: 0.98.3-7
Followup-For: Bug #306840

hi,

debian/rules does only insert an extra backslash when 
I_WANT_SSL=yes is set. 
Maybe this is due to wrong syntax ?
Copied the way mysql does it and it works. 
Heres a patch.

Cheers,
Christoph



[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ diff quagga-0.98.3/debian/rules 
pachted_quagga/quagga-0.98.3/debian/rules
9a10,16
>
>
> ifeq ($(WANT_SNMP), 1)
>   USE_SNMP=--enable-snmp
> endif
>
>
23,29c30,36
<   if [ -z "$$I_WANT_OPENSSL" ]; then \
< echo "DEBIAN: SNMP disabled, see README.Debian"; \
< USE_SNMP="--disable-snmp"; \
<   else \
< echo "DEBIAN: SNMP enabled, sorry for your inconvenience"; \
< USE_SNMP="--enable-snmp"; \
<   fi
---
>   #if [ -z "$$I_WANT_OPENSSL" ]; then \
>   #  echo "DEBIAN: SNMP disabled, see README.Debian"; \
>   #  USE_SNMP="--disable-snmp"; \
>   #else \
>   #  echo "DEBIAN: SNMP enabled, sorry for your inconvenience"; \
>   #  USE_SNMP="--enable-snmp"; \
>   #fi




-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages quagga depends on:
ii  iproute 20041019-3   Professional tools to control the 
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpam0g0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libreadline44.3-11   GNU readline and history libraries
ii  logrotate   3.7-2Log rotation utility

-- debconf information excluded


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

[Steve Langasek]

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I believe a failure to upgrade while udev is installed is serious.

> Please lower again (and sorry for bothering the busy release team then)
> if I  am for some reason mistaken.

I agree that this is an RC bug, and I've just uploaded an NMU that includes
your patch.  The full diff for this NMU is attached.

-release, please approve mdadm 1.9.0-4.1 for sarge (and, when you're
comfortable with it, bump the urgency, since it won't make it in before
Friday otherwise).

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u mdadm-1.9.0/debian/changelog mdadm-1.9.0/debian/changelog
--- mdadm-1.9.0/debian/changelog
+++ mdadm-1.9.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+mdadm (1.9.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix
+  * Make sure error output from MAKEDEV is sent to stderr, to avoid
+interfering with debconf; this avoids installation problems on
+udev-using systems.  Thanks to Jonas Smedegaard for the patch.
+Closes: #299623.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed,  1 Jun 2005 03:36:42 -0700
+
 mdadm (1.9.0-4) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * High-urgency upload for sarge targeted RC bugfix.
diff -u mdadm-1.9.0/debian/mdadm.postinst mdadm-1.9.0/debian/mdadm.postinst
--- mdadm-1.9.0/debian/mdadm.postinst
+++ mdadm-1.9.0/debian/mdadm.postinst
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
 
 set -e
 
-if [ ! -e /dev/.devfsd ] && [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then
+if [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then
 cd /dev
-/sbin/MAKEDEV md
+/sbin/MAKEDEV md 1>&2
 fi
 
 if [ "$1" = "configure" ]; then


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mdadm 1.9.0-4.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 299623 + fixed
Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

[Agustin Martin]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente) 
wrote:
> Package: fp-compiler
> Version: 2.0.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> Setting up fp-compiler (2.0.0-2) ...
> update-alternatives: slave link name /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz duplicated
> dpkg: error processing fp-compiler (--configure):

Reproduced,

Carlos and Kenshi, the problem seems to be that the alternative is not
removed from the prerm, so the postinst tries to set it again over an
already existent alternative.

Cheers,

-- 
Agustin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311436: alternatives broken

[Johannes Berg]

I also just got this when upgrading and it turned out that
my /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/pc file was somehow broken. I purged
fp-compiler and deleted the file, and reinstalling now worked (I have no
other pc installed at all!)

This was the contents of the file:
auto
/usr/bin/pc
fpc.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz

/usr/bin/fpc
20
/usr/share/man/man1/fpc.1.gz


I don't know anything about the alternatives system, maybe you know what
broke it.

johannes


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

[A Mennucc]

hi

I am sending this mail to many recipients since I need help

 -

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Package: lpr-ppd
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> 
> Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But
> after the change, I was left with no /etc/printcap and a dead link to
> that location from /etc/lprng/printcap. Clearly, there is an upgrade
> path missing, even if lprng???s config format may be slightly different.


/etc/printcap is a "conffile" of lpr-ppd ; if
lpr-ppd is removed, /etc/printcap will still be there ;
but if you purge  lpr-ppd  , dpkg will delete /etc/printcap ,
since it is not a conffile of lprng

I see no easy way to solve this problem, since lpr-ppd was
removed from Debian some time ago

1) one way would be to have a dummy lpr-ppd package that depends
 on lprng, and that does not have /etc/printcap as a conffile

 I dont know if the debian-release time would approve its
 inclusion in Debian/Sarge , though

 Moreover this would *force* people that are using lpr-ppd 
 to switch to lprng, and this is not what I want: I cannot
 guarantee that the switch would be 100% painless and transparent

2) another solution would be to change lprng so that /etc/printcap
 is a conffile ( I am not sure if this would work, though)

any suggestions?

a.

-- 
Andrea Mennucc
 "Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

[frans . pop]

(Sending this from work, so sorry for breaking thread and I have now idea
how formatting will turn out...)

-if [ ! -e /dev/.devfsd ] && [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then
+if [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then

I wonder if this change is correct for a udev fix.

IIRC "-e /dev/.devfsd" checks for _devfsd_, not udev.
IIRC udev has a /dev/.udev and a /dev/.static (or similar, can't check
now).

Cheers,
Frans



* DISCLAIMER *
De informatie in dit e-mail bericht is uitsluitend
bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Verstrekking aan
en gebruik door anderen is niet toegestaan.
Door de electronische verzending van het bericht
kunnen er geen rechten worden ontleend aan de
informatie.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: fp-compiler: Error installing package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 311436 patch
Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

[Agustin Martin]

tag 311436 patch
thanks

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:00PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente) 
> wrote:
> > Package: fp-compiler
> > Version: 2.0.0-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> > Setting up fp-compiler (2.0.0-2) ...
> > update-alternatives: slave link name /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz duplicated
> > dpkg: error processing fp-compiler (--configure):
> 
> Reproduced,
> 
> Carlos and Kenshi, the problem seems to be that the alternative is not
> removed from the prerm, so the postinst tries to set it again over an
> already existent alternative.

s/prerm/preinst/

Please consider the attached patch

Cheers,

-- 
Agustin
diff -Naur fpc-2.0.0.carlos/debian/changelog fpc-2.0.0/debian/changelog
--- fpc-2.0.0.carlos/debian/changelog   2005-06-01 13:37:06.0 +0200
+++ fpc-2.0.0/debian/changelog  2005-06-01 13:34:45.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+fpc (2.0.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * debian/fp-compiler.preinst:
+- New file. We need to remove /usr/bin/fpc as a pc alternative in the
+  preinst, so it can be recreated from the postinst without failing on
+  duplicated link error. Fixes RC-Bug (closes: #311436)
+
+ --
+
 fpc (2.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/fp-compiler.postinst.in: forgot to reapply the patch that
diff -Naur fpc-2.0.0.carlos/debian/fp-compiler.preinst 
fpc-2.0.0/debian/fp-compiler.preinst
--- fpc-2.0.0.carlos/debian/fp-compiler.preinst 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
+++ fpc-2.0.0/debian/fp-compiler.preinst2005-06-01 13:30:41.0 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+#! /bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+# Remove fpc from pc alternative
+/usr/sbin/update-alternatives --remove pc /usr/bin/fpc
+
+# Debhelper code
+#DEBHELPER#

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > Package: lpr-ppd
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> > 
> > Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But
> > after the change, I was left with no /etc/printcap and a dead link to
> > that location from /etc/lprng/printcap. Clearly, there is an upgrade
> > path missing, even if lprng???s config format may be slightly different.

> /etc/printcap is a "conffile" of lpr-ppd ; if
> lpr-ppd is removed, /etc/printcap will still be there ;
> but if you purge  lpr-ppd  , dpkg will delete /etc/printcap ,
> since it is not a conffile of lprng

> I see no easy way to solve this problem, since lpr-ppd was
> removed from Debian some time ago

> 1) one way would be to have a dummy lpr-ppd package that depends
>  on lprng, and that does not have /etc/printcap as a conffile

>  I dont know if the debian-release time would approve its
>  inclusion in Debian/Sarge , though

>  Moreover this would *force* people that are using lpr-ppd 
>  to switch to lprng, and this is not what I want: I cannot
>  guarantee that the switch would be 100% painless and transparent

> 2) another solution would be to change lprng so that /etc/printcap
>  is a conffile ( I am not sure if this would work, though)

> any suggestions?

I don't see any reason to worry about it; I think it was a bug for lpr-ppd
to ship /etc/printcap as a conffile, but it's a historical bug that I don't
think we should be trying to fix now.  The simple answer is "well, don't
purge packages without looking at the conffile list!".

It would definitely be wrong for lprng to declare /etc/printcap as a
conffile; there are many packages that use /etc/printcap, with no common
package they can depend on which could own this conffile, and /etc/printcap
also doesn't fit policy's description of what a conffile should be.  (If
you're installing a printer daemon, you almost certainly want to print,
which means customizing the printcap...)

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310982: smbfs: bad interaction between uid= and CAP_UNIX, need advice for Debian sarge

[Steve Langasek]

Hi folks,

Andrew Bartlett and I have been having a spirited discussion[1] about a
bug report from a Debian user(/developer) that the semantics of smbfs
silently change when upgrading to the latest Linux 2.4 kernels.  Because
smbfs now understands CAP_UNIX, the uid=, gid=, fmask=, dmask= mount options
are ignored when connecting to a Samba server in favor of passing through
the Unix permissions from the remote server.  This completely changes the
security model, and ties the security of the mount to the Unix uid layout of
the remote server, even when the user has explicitly requested otherwise at
mount time.

I think this is definitely a bug in the kernel smbfs implementation, but I'm
up against the wall for the sarge release on this one -- there's no way we'd
be able to get a kernel fix in before release, but we *could* conceivably
patch smbmount to strip CAP_UNIX from the capabilites before passing the
server info down to the kernel whenever the user specifies a uid= mount
option (or the like).

Andrew thinks this is a terrible idea :), I think it's perfectly reasonable
because people using such mount options are not likely to be concerned about
POSIX semantics on the mount point.  What do you all think?  Can I do this
without being lynched later, or should I punt this to be fixed as a kernel
security bug post-release?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/310982


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

[A Mennucc]

maybe this problem may be mentioned in the Sarge release notes ?

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:46:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:

> > any suggestions?
> 
> I don't see any reason to worry about it; I think it was a bug for lpr-ppd
> to ship /etc/printcap as a conffile, but it's a historical bug that I don't
> think we should be trying to fix now.  The simple answer is "well, don't
> purge packages without looking at the conffile list!".
> 
> It would definitely be wrong for lprng to declare /etc/printcap as a
> conffile; there are many packages that use /etc/printcap, with no common
> package they can depend on which could own this conffile, and /etc/printcap
> also doesn't fit policy's description of what a conffile should be.  (If
> you're installing a printer daemon, you almost certainly want to print,
> which means customizing the printcap...)
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Steve Langasek
> postmodern programmer



-- 
Andrea Mennucc
 "Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311263: Adjusting distribution

[Bill Allombert]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:03:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> reopen 311263 
> tags 311263 = sarge
> reopen 311257
> tags 311257 = sarge
> thanks
> 
> Since new packages have been pushed to sid I'm tagging these bugs 'sarge' 
> only. I've done upgrade tests from the woody (1.8) -> sid (2.3.2-3) version 
> in a chroot and everything seems to work fine (user's will not get a prompt 
> about configuration files unless they have changed them and the 
> conflicting file is replaced).
> 
> I would appreciate testing of this new version, I will ask -release to push 
> this version into sarge if nobody finds any new bugs with this release.

I have grabbed 2.3.2-3 from incoming and it work fine.  I have modified
exactly one conffile and dpkg prompt me only for this one, so this is
good.

I have also read the patch, and it seems OK.

Thanks a lot for your work on theses issues,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311188: Possible compromise...

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 31-05-2005 08:08, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> Alex Owen wrote:
> 
>>Could we not come to a working compromise for sarge no the basis that a
>>propper solution is found for etch... something along the lines of this.
>>
>>debian-edu-config could use debconf to ask the admin somthing like:
>> "Do you wish to apply the debian-edu configuation?
>>  Doing so will alter the configuration of several independent packages
>>  installed on your system"
> 
> 
> Installing Debian-edu-config will not lead to a lot of configuration
> beeing modified. If so, there is a bug.

Agree. The problem is not with giving a big enough warning. The problem
is that the basic logic of Debian is that each single package has
authority for automated handling of its conffiles - no other package is
allowed to overrule that.

Child abuse is illegal in most societies, even if you ask first!


So I don't see a good solution for sarge (to mark this as sarge-ignore
is a bad solution IMHO).

The good solution I believe is to define more "distribution choices" (as
implemented in base-config) into Debian, and convince relevant packages
to extend relevant "package choices" with a "use distro default".

Until package maintainers adopt such approach, CDDs cannot _within_
Debian provide different defaults, but must do so by adding/replacing
packages _outside_ of Debian.


> Running base-config, will lead to some modification (maybe most, I dont
> remember). running cfengine-debian-edu will also lead to a lot of files
> beeing changed.

I believe then "a lot of files" is what gets modified also when running
base-config: base-config seems to hook into debian-edu simply by
executing cfengine-debian-edu.


>>This could be preseeded by debian-edu fokes (right?) but give sutable
>>warning to others!
> 
> 
> I think Jonas also cares about upgrading, and upgrading an old
> installation and then running base-config could lead to unforeen results.

Correct. Thanks for clarifying, Finn-Arne.


>>This is going to be a common problem for all CDD's (custom debian
>>distroes). Perhaps each cdd is allowed one package like this... each of
>>the spercial packages would have to conflict with eacho other (or
>>something) so only one can be installed.

Actually, this may not be that common among CDDs: recent discussion on
debian-custom reveiled to me that those CDDs using cddtk has a saner
approach (behaviour changes is tied to a metapackage and disappears
again when the package is removed), alot different from the Skolelinux
approach (behaviour changes is tied to the distro and applied at install
time) which breaks policy.


A Debian package has stricter rules than the local admin. This is needed
in order for the local admin to be able to trust the system to not "take
over" or do other surprises. and it is needed for packages not to "be at
war" with each other: No package is allowed to overrule another package!


> Until every package is preconfigurable, I think this is something we
> need, yes.

Debconf preseeding in itself is allowed only by local admins, not
(official Debian) distros. That's the point of this bugreport.

But they are a step in the right direction. :-)


 - Jonas


- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCnau5n7DbMsAkQLgRAv3MAJ0aXpG0mP3+YB+cOylaYHX2+2FM/wCfQfYv
32XjYao2mAZr1YZS2FKHH2k=
=+Smz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:20:09PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> maybe this problem may be mentioned in the Sarge release notes ?

Please contact debian-doc@lists.debian.org about adding it to the release
notes if you think it should be mentioned.

IMHO, it seems like a minor issue; I don't think the release notes should be
a substitute for documentation that explains the Debian packaging system to
users, and too much detail in the release notes just reduces the number of
users who will read it.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:46:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> 
> > > any suggestions?
> > 
> > I don't see any reason to worry about it; I think it was a bug for lpr-ppd
> > to ship /etc/printcap as a conffile, but it's a historical bug that I don't
> > think we should be trying to fix now.  The simple answer is "well, don't
> > purge packages without looking at the conffile list!".
> > 
> > It would definitely be wrong for lprng to declare /etc/printcap as a
> > conffile; there are many packages that use /etc/printcap, with no common
> > package they can depend on which could own this conffile, and /etc/printcap
> > also doesn't fit policy's description of what a conffile should be.  (If
> > you're installing a printer daemon, you almost certainly want to print,
> > which means customizing the printcap...)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -- 
> > Steve Langasek
> > postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#295221: marked as done (twiki: Twiki should depend on libtext-diff-perl and not provide these files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:08:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 295221 already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2005 14:24:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 06:24:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com [155.208.255.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0h9i-gk-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:24:54 -0800
Received: from concerto.grenoble.hp.com (concerto.grenoble.hp.com 
[15.128.15.118])
by bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EBC3835F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:24:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from komarr.grenoble.hp.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [15.128.128.11])
by concerto.grenoble.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_28760_binary)/8.9.3 SMKit6.0.6 
OpenMail) with ESMTP id PAA25893
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:24:52 +0100 (MET)
Received: from domi by komarr.grenoble.hp.com with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D0h9f-0005Pb-Vd; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:24:51 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: twiki: Twiki should depend on libtext-diff-perl and not provide these 
files
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:24:51 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on komarr.grenoble.hp.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to 
false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: twiki
Version: 20040902-1
Severity: important


Hello Sven

Twiki 20030201-6 provides Text::Diff perl module :

$ dpkg --contents twiki_20040902-1_all.deb |grep Text
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2004-07-31 08:22:34 ./usr/share/perl5/Text/
-rw-r--r-- root/root 21209 2004-07-31 21:39:57 
./usr/share/perl5/Text/Diff.pm

But these files are already provided in their own module
libtext-diff-perl:

$ dpkg --listfiles libtext-diff-perl
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/perl5
/usr/share/perl5/Text
/usr/share/perl5/Text/Diff.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Text/Diff
/usr/share/perl5/Text/Diff/Table.pm
/usr/share/man
/usr/share/man/man3
/usr/share/man/man3/Text::Diff.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Text::Diff::Table.3pm.gz
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libtext-diff-perl
/usr/share/doc/libtext-diff-perl/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libtext-diff-perl/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/libtext-diff-perl/changelog.Debian.gz

So I cannot install last version of twiki if libtext-diff-perl is
already installed.

I think Twiki should depend on libtext-diff-perl instead and should
not provide these files.

Note that I currently have twiki 20030201-6 installed so some of the
informations gathered by reportbug may be inconsistent with twiki
20040902-1.

Cheers


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages twiki depends on:
ii  apache-common 1.3.33-4   support files for all Apache webse
ii  debconf   1.4.45 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libalgorithm-diff-perl1.19.01-1  a perl library for finding Longest
ii  libdigest-sha1-perl   2.10-1 NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith
ii  libnet-perl   1:1.19-1   Implementation of Internet protoco
ii  perl [libmime-base64-perl]5.8.4-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.4-6Core Perl modules
ii  rcs   5.7-14 The GNU Revision Control System

-- debconf information:
* twiki/samplefiles: false
* twiki/wikiwebmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* twiki/defaultUrlHost: http://komarr.grenoble.hp.com/
* twiki/apacheUserCreationNote:

---
Received: (at 295221-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 13:09:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 06:09:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from coltrane.azu.nl [143.121.16

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

[Andreas Barth]

* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050601 13:38]:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > Package: lpr-ppd
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> > 
> > Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But
> > after the change, I was left with no /etc/printcap and a dead link to
> > that location from /etc/lprng/printcap. Clearly, there is an upgrade
> > path missing, even if lprng???s config format may be slightly different.
> 
> 
> /etc/printcap is a "conffile" of lpr-ppd ; if
> lpr-ppd is removed, /etc/printcap will still be there ;
> but if you purge  lpr-ppd  , dpkg will delete /etc/printcap ,
> since it is not a conffile of lprng
> 
> I see no easy way to solve this problem, since lpr-ppd was
> removed from Debian some time ago
> 
> 1) one way would be to have a dummy lpr-ppd package that depends
>  on lprng, and that does not have /etc/printcap as a conffile

If you drop the conffile, it won't be deleted. So, e.g. adding an
updated lpr-ppd in the next point release would work - just, that there
won't be another woody point release :(

Also, just an empty dummy package w/o marking that file as conffile (and
w/o shipping it at all) works.


Cheers,
Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311514: Package: kopete 3.3.2-5 crash

[Krisztian Toth]

Package: kopete
Version: 3.3.2-5
Severity: grave
Debian version: Sarge
Kernel: 2.6.11.7

When I tried to login to my MSN account kopete crashed instantly. I'm behind
a firewall. Kopete useless as an IM for MSN behind a firewall.

I clicked the kopete crash handler. Here's the backtrace:

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
`system-supplied DSO at 0xe000' has disappeared; keeping its symbols.
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1238617984 (LWP 18355)]
[New Thread -1262662736 (LWP 18655)]
[New Thread -1254274128 (LWP 18654)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[KCrash handler]
#3  0xb42a0956 in SSL_read () from /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7
#4  0xb5e3b6e5 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#5  0xb788ee44 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.4
#6  0x1882 in ?? ()
#7  0xb75a9e76 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.4
#8  0xb75973c8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.4
#9  0xb788c380 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.4
#10 0xb788c380 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.4
#11 0xb766c739 in KOpenSSLProxy::SSL_read () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.4
#12 0xb7655e06 in KSSL::read () from /usr/lib/libkio.so.4
#13 0xb5e6e7cb in SslLoginHandler::readSslData ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#14 0xb5e6d4a8 in SslLoginHandler::dataReceived ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#15 0xb5e6d618 in SslLoginHandler::login ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#16 0xb5e70a4d in MSNNotifySocket::parseCommand ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#17 0xb5e6340a in MSNSocket::parseLine ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#18 0xb5e629a3 in MSNSocket::slotReadLine ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#19 0xb5e616e7 in MSNSocket::slotDataReceived ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#20 0xb5e6619b in MSNSocket::qt_invoke ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#21 0xb5e79789 in MSNNotifySocket::qt_invoke ()
  from /usr/lib/libkopete_msn_shared.so.0
#22 0xb6b2071c in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#23 0xb6b20544 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#24 0xb7239cee in KNetwork::KClientSocketBase::readyRead ()
  from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4
#25 0xb7239458 in KNetwork::KClientSocketBase::slotReadActivity ()
  from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4
#26 0xb7240c48 in KNetwork::KBufferedSocket::slotReadActivity ()
  from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4
#27 0xb72410d2 in KNetwork::KBufferedSocket::qt_invoke ()
  from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4
#28 0xb6b2071c in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#29 0xb6b2087d in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#30 0xb6e60452 in QSocketNotifier::activated () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#31 0xb6b3cf00 in QSocketNotifier::event () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#32 0xb6ac3e1f in QApplication::internalNotify () from
/usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
#33 0xb6ac341e in QApplica

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

[Carlos Laviola]

2005/6/1, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente) 
> wrote:
> > Setting up fp-compiler (2.0.0-2) ...
> > update-alternatives: slave link name /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz duplicated
> > dpkg: error processing fp-compiler (--configure):
> 
> Reproduced,
> 
> Carlos and Kenshi, the problem seems to be that the alternative is not
> removed from the prerm, so the postinst tries to set it again over an
> already existent alternative.

Yes, that's true. I have prepared a new package based on your patch
that also removes the link on prerm if it's not an upgrade.

In the meantime, affected users can just run the command manually and
wait for the new packages, by running the following as root:

update-alternatives --remove pc /usr/bin/fpc

Later,
Carlos

-- 
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 310763 + patch
Bug#310763: gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

[Guilherme M. Gondim (semente)]

Em Qua, 2005-06-01 às 13:15 +0900, Kenshi Muto escreveu:

> Guilherme, what's status of your /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz?
> Could you check by ls -l and dpkg -S? If it points symlink, please
> check referred file also.

I dont speak english, ok? Spanish?

Sigue lo que pidió:

$ ls -l /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz -rw-r--r--  1 root root 5009
2005-05-20 19:19 /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz

$ dpkg -S /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz
dpkg: /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz não encontrado. 

$ dpkg -S pc.1.gz
fp-compiler: /usr/share/man/man1/ppcppc.1.gz
qemu: /usr/share/man/man1/qemu-ppc.1.gz
fp-compiler: /usr/share/man/man1/fpc.1.gz
qemu: /usr/share/man/man1/qemu-system-ppc.1.gz
perl-doc: /usr/share/man/man1/perlipc.1.gz

Thanks,
Guilherme "semente"

-- 
Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente)
Movido a Debian GNU/Linux e anarquismo!
# aptitude install anarchism
"A propriedade é um roubo!" (Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph)






Yahoo! Mail, cada vez melhor: agora com 1GB de espaço grátis! 
http://mail.yahoo.com.br


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311514: This bug is not grave

[Martin Lohmeier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: kopete
Version: 3.3.2-5
Severity: normal


Hi Krisztian,

this is no grave bug, since grace mean:

makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes  
data
loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the  
accounts of
users who use the package.



by, Martin
- --

Powered by Debian GNU / Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCnckXOvJj+wS6JuIRAm7jAJ9di8r93+VMAkImU2KjJ8c9njpZawCgkks2
bkYqAoBTstR/d8jmEkPJgNE=
=oY29
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: kopete severity downgrade

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 311514 important
Bug#311514: Package: kopete 3.3.2-5 crash
Severity set to `important'.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310763: gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found

[Roger Leigh]

tags 310763 + patch
thanks

Hi,

A complete patch is attached to fix the build problems.  Although the
changelog says I've NMU'd it, I haven't uploaded it yet, since I
thought you might prefer to check it yourself.  If you like, I can NMU
it.

I'd just like to note that the bulk of the diff was the hard work of
the jade maintainer, Neil Roeth.

The files are here:

http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06.orig.tar.gz
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-3.diff.gz
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-3.dsc
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-3.1_all.deb
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-3.1_powerpc.changes
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-3.1_20050601-1435 [build 
log]

Here's the patch:

diff -urN gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/debian/changelog 
gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/debian/changelog
--- gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/debian/changelog   2005-06-01 12:16:22.0 
+0100
+++ gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/debian/changelog   2005-06-01 14:10:06.001009984 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+gnupg-doc (2003.04.06-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * gph/db2any:
+- Fix jadetex checks by searching for "(^e-TeX|^TeX)" rather than
+  "^TeX", to work with both old and new jadetex versions.
+- Applied patch from Neil Roeth to use openjade rather than jade.
+- The remaining changes are to complete the change to openjade.
+Closes: #310763
+  * Updated build dependencies to depend on openjade1.3 and opensp,
+rather than jade.
+  * debian/doc-base-gnu-privacy-handbook-it: Correct invalid doc-base URL.
+  * gph/common/rules.am: Clean manual.out files generated during the build.
+
+ -- Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed,  1 Jun 2005 14:07:39 +0100
+
 gnupg-doc (2003.04.06-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * gph/db2any: add '/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular' as
diff -urN gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/debian/control 
gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/debian/control
--- gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/debian/control 2005-06-01 12:16:22.0 
+0100
+++ gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/debian/control 2005-06-01 12:23:45.702962720 +0100
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.5.9.0
-Build-Depends-Indep: sgmltools-lite, docbook-to-man, docbook-utils, autoconf, 
automake, linuxdoc-tools-latex, linuxdoc-tools-text, imagemagick, w3m, jade
+Build-Depends-Indep: sgmltools-lite, docbook-to-man, docbook-utils, autoconf, 
automake, linuxdoc-tools-latex, linuxdoc-tools-text, imagemagick, w3m, 
openjade1.3, opensp
 
 Package: gnupg-doc
 Architecture: all
diff -urN gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/debian/doc-base-gnu-privacy-handbook-it 
gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/debian/doc-base-gnu-privacy-handbook-it
--- gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/debian/doc-base-gnu-privacy-handbook-it
2005-06-01 12:16:22.0 +0100
+++ gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/debian/doc-base-gnu-privacy-handbook-it
2005-06-01 13:36:47.802782288 +0100
@@ -8,5 +8,5 @@
 Files: /usr/share/doc/gnupg-doc/GNU_Privacy_Handbook/it/manual.txt.gz
 
 Format: HTML
-Index: /usr/share/doc/gnupg-doc/GNU_Privacy_Handbook/it/html/index.html
+Index: /usr/share/doc/gnupg-doc/GNU_Privacy_Handbook/it/html/book1.html
 Files: /usr/share/doc/gnupg-doc/GNU_Privacy_Handbook/it/html/*.html
diff -urN gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/gph/common/rules.am 
gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/gph/common/rules.am
--- gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/gph/common/rules.am2001-04-27 
17:08:40.0 +0100
+++ gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/gph/common/rules.am2005-06-01 13:25:33.775250048 
+0100
@@ -11,3 +11,5 @@
 
 %.texi : %.sgml
$(DB2ANY) --mode texinfo $<
+
+CLEANFILES = manual.out
diff -urN gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/gph/db2any gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/gph/db2any
--- gnupg-doc-2003.04.06.old/gph/db2any 2005-06-01 12:16:22.0 +0100
+++ gnupg-doc-2003.04.06/gph/db2any 2005-06-01 12:18:56.815880232 +0100
@@ -221,17 +221,17 @@
 # running on and where the Docbook tools are installed.
 # Tell about it when running in verbose mode.
 do_systemcheck () {
-# look for Jade
-jade_version=`jade -v &1 | \
-  sed -n 's/.*:I:.*Jade version "\([0-9.]*\)"/\1/p'`
+# look for OpenJade
+jade_version=`openjade -v &1 | \
+  sed -n 's/.*:I:.*\"openjade\" version "\([0-9.]*\)"/\1/p'`
 if [ -z "$jade_version" ]; then
-   echo "$pgm: error: jade not found" >&2
+   echo "$pgm: error: openjade not found" >&2
exit 1
 fi
-[ $verbose = yes ] && echo "$pgm: Jade version $jade_version found" >&2
+[ $verbose = yes ] && echo "$pgm: OpenJade version $jade_version found" >&2
 
 # look for JadeTeX
-if ! jadetex -v 2>/dev/null | grep -q '^TeX' ; then
+if ! jadetex -v 2>/dev/null | grep -q -E '(^e-TeX|^TeX)' ; then
echo "$pgm: error: jadetex not found" >&2
exit 1
 fi
@@ -250,11 +250,11 @@
exit 1
 fi
 [ $verbose = yes ] && echo "$pgm: docbook2texi found" >&2
-if ! sgml2

Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check

[Jaakko Niemi]

On Wed, 01 Jun 2005, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> here is a proposed source package.

 Hi,

 Kari is preparing the upload and I am going to sponsor
 it if needed. 

--j



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

[Michael Piefel]

Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 04:46 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> The simple answer is "well, don't
> purge packages without looking at the conffile list!".

Are you serious? You want the users to always look at the conffile list,
just in case the package has declared the wrong file at its conffile?
And you don’t even consider this an issue?

I do. I lost a printcap. Of course, using unstable, I expect things to
break and I have restored the file already. But I still consider this a
bug. A dummy package would be the nice way. Perhaps even depending on
lpr-ng; users do not have to update, they can put lpr-ppd on hold.

Bye,
   Mike

-- 
|=| Michael Piefel
|=| Member of the Debian project

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 04:46 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > The simple answer is "well, don't
> > purge packages without looking at the conffile list!".

> Are you serious? You want the users to always look at the conffile list,
> just in case the package has declared the wrong file at its conffile?
> And you don’t even consider this an issue?

Why were you purging the package instead of removing it?  If you don't even
know what files are marked as conffiles by the package, why did it need to
be purged anyway?

As I said, this is a bug in a historical package, not a current one.  It's
certainly a bug, but for me, working around historical breakage is of a
lower priority than, say, guarding against breakage of current packages.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package

[Norbert Tretkowski]

Package: nagios-common
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

>From nagios-common's postrm:

| rm -Rf {/var/cache,/var/run,/var/log,/etc}/nagios

Removing /etc/nagios is a _bad_ idea, especially when you still have
other nagios related packages like nagios-nrpe-server installed.

When purging nagios-common, the configuration files nrpe.cfg and
nrpe_local.cfg from nagios-nrpe-server in /etc/nagios are removed.

Regards, Norbert

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-sparc64
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

[martin f krafft]

also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.01.1317 +0200]:
> -if [ ! -e /dev/.devfsd ] && [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then
> +if [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then
> 
> I wonder if this change is correct for a udev fix.

I do not have the mental capacity after this day to judge it, but
vorlon took care of it, and I do trust his judgement. From a cursory
look, it seems that the only downside of the fix is a stray error
message for devfs users.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
#define emacs eighty megabytes and constantly swapping.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310311: NMU fixed

[Jordi Mallach]

Hey guys,

Sorry for the 0 hour nmu I just uploaded, but I needed this in unstable
ASAP to try to get a fixed somaplayer compiled, and this one is
targetted for sarge.

Attached is the nmu diff, just added the shlibs thingy for cdbs.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
diff -u libmad-0.15.1b/debian/changelog libmad-0.15.1b/debian/changelog
--- libmad-0.15.1b/debian/changelog
+++ libmad-0.15.1b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+libmad (0.15.1b-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload, not targetted for Sarge.
+  * Urgency high because this is generating uploads with broken depends
+that may be propagating to testing (see #311488).
+  * debian/rules: set DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_ALL = -V 'libmad0 (>= 0.15.1b)'
+to restore the updated shlibs lost in the switch to CDBS
+(closes: #310311).
+
+ -- Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed,  1 Jun 2005 17:12:24 +0200
+
 libmad (0.15.1b-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Sam Clegg :
diff -u libmad-0.15.1b/debian/rules libmad-0.15.1b/debian/rules
--- libmad-0.15.1b/debian/rules
+++ libmad-0.15.1b/debian/rules
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
 DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS += --disable-profiling --disable-debugging
 endif
 
+DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_ALL = -V 'libmad0 (>= 0.15.1b)'
+
 build: build-stamp
 build-stamp:
dh_testdir


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310763: marked as done (gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:32:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310763: fixed in gnupg-doc 2003.04.06-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 19:41:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 12:41:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Db1l0-0004VS-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 12:41:35 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 659F72240AD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 May 2005 21:41:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322E622414A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 May 2005 21:41:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9C6F026136; Wed, 25 May 2005 21:41:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 21:41:32 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnupg-doc
Version: 2003.04.06-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
db2any: error: jadetex not found
configure: WARNING:
***
*** It seems that the Docbook environment is not installed as required.
*** We will try to build everything,  but if you either touch some files
*** or use a bogus make tool, you may run into problems.
*** Docbook is normally only needed to build the documentation.
*** To further investigate the problem you can run the command
***./db2any --systemcheck --verbose
***
configure: error:
***
*** Due to missing programs it might not be possible to build this package.
*** For your convenience some rendered versions of documention has
*** already been build for you and distributed as part of this
*** package.  Please use the versions from the correspondig
*** language subdirectory.
*** We apologize for his inconvenience,
***Your GPH project team
***
make: *** [build] Error 1

The db2any script does:
# look for JadeTeX
if ! jadetex -v 2>/dev/null | grep -q '^TeX' ; then
echo "$pgm: error: jadetex not found" >&2
exit 1
fi

jadetex -v does not return anything matching ^TeX.
jadetex is a symlink to etex and returns something that
would match ^e-TeX however.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 310763-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 15:38:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 08:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdVIB-0001UY-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:38:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdVCd-0004jv-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:32:19 -0400
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#310763: fixed in gnupg-doc 2003.04.06-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:32:19 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: gnupg-doc
Source-Version: 2003.04.06-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnupg-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnupg-doc/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-4.diff.gz
gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-4.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnupg-doc/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-4.dsc
gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnupg-doc/gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes betwe

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libmad 0.15.1b-2.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 310311 + fixed
Bug#310311: lost versioned shlibs in new version
Tags were: pending sid
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 311526 confirmed sarge sid
Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from 
another package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, sarge, sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311526: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package

[sean finney]

tags 311526 confirmed sarge sid
thanks

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:06:24PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Package: nagios-common
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> From nagios-common's postrm:
> 
> | rm -Rf {/var/cache,/var/run,/var/log,/etc}/nagios
> 
> Removing /etc/nagios is a _bad_ idea, especially when you still have
> other nagios related packages like nagios-nrpe-server installed.

yeah, this is definitely a bad idea.  i think this particular line
predates our management of the package, which is probably how it
slipped under our radar.  

i'm cc'ing debian-release on this one... coming up with a fix for this
shouldn't be too complicated or take too long and i can probably get it
done very late this evening (EDT).  is this too late for sarge?  if so,
i'll put the update in for the first sarge update.


sean

-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310982: smbfs: bad interaction between uid= and CAP_UNIX, need advice for Debian sarge

[Jeremy Allison]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:14:29AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> Andrew Bartlett and I have been having a spirited discussion[1] about a
> bug report from a Debian user(/developer) that the semantics of smbfs
> silently change when upgrading to the latest Linux 2.4 kernels.  Because
> smbfs now understands CAP_UNIX, the uid=, gid=, fmask=, dmask= mount options
> are ignored when connecting to a Samba server in favor of passing through
> the Unix permissions from the remote server.  This completely changes the
> security model, and ties the security of the mount to the Unix uid layout of
> the remote server, even when the user has explicitly requested otherwise at
> mount time.
> 
> I think this is definitely a bug in the kernel smbfs implementation, but I'm
> up against the wall for the sarge release on this one -- there's no way we'd
> be able to get a kernel fix in before release, but we *could* conceivably
> patch smbmount to strip CAP_UNIX from the capabilites before passing the
> server info down to the kernel whenever the user specifies a uid= mount
> option (or the like).
> 
> Andrew thinks this is a terrible idea :), I think it's perfectly reasonable
> because people using such mount options are not likely to be concerned about
> POSIX semantics on the mount point.  What do you all think?  Can I do this
> without being lynched later, or should I punt this to be fixed as a kernel
> security bug post-release?

Personally if you're worried about a security issue I'd say it's acceptable
to turn off CAP_UNIX until the kernel code gets fixed. Otherwise the user
gets suprised, and that's not good.

Jeremy.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310763: jade problem with gnupg-doc (#310763)

[Roger Leigh]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On May 30, Neil Roeth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>  > On May 30, Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>  >  > 
>  >  > Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>  >  > 
>  >  > [gnupg-doc]
>  >  > > I'm not having much luck.  I do not see anywhere in the DocBook 
> stylesheets
>  >  > > where it does not use the value of the variable %html-ext% for the 
> html file
>  >  > > extension.
>  >  > 
>  >  > Very odd.  It last built on Mon, 1 Nov 2004, according to the
>  >  > changelog, and hasn't changed since.  I assume from this there must
>  >  > have been a change on the docbook tools that broke it somehow.
>  >  > 
>  >  > > I did notice that this document is using a very old version of 
> DocBook, and
>  >  > > it's possible that the DocBook stylesheets are no longer compatible 
> with that.
>  >  > 
>  >  > I tried with the 4.1 DTD.  It processed with warnings (I removed
>  >  > obsolete docinfo elements), but still generated .htm.
>  >  > 
>  >  > > I'll keep looking into it.
>  > 
>  > I'm making some progress.  In gph/db2any, I changed all occurrences of 
> jade to
>  > openjade and added a command line option -V '(define %html-ext% ".html")' 
> and
>  > that made the extension stick.  I also changed all occurrences of nsgmls to
>  > onsgmls and sgml2xml to osx, since those are the names of the commands in
>  > OpenSP corresponding to the older SP commands.  This would require changing
>  > the build dependencies form jade and sp to openjade1.3 and opensp.  Be
>  > forewarned that openjade takes a lot longer to run than jade.  I do not
>  > understand why the equivalent redefinition of %html-ext% in the
>  > gph/common/gph-style.dsl stylesheet does not seem effective.  I'll 
> continue to
>  > work on it some more to get it down to the necessary changes to make it 
> work -
>  > I hesitate to send you what I have at the moment because I changed a 
> number of
>  > things for debugging, etc., many of which I am sure are unnecessary.
>  > 
>  > BTW, I noticed that the db2any script appears to move html files around, 
> but
>  > there is an %output-dir% variable that can be used to do the equivalent.  
> This
>  > could be used to simplify the script - probably best left until post-Sarge.
>
> Here's a diff for db2any that will create the files with the html extension.
> You'll need to change the build dependencies as mentioned above.

Many thanks.  I did a bit more testing, and created a diff for it,
including all your changes (its in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310763 and the final
packages are at http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/).  Unfortunately,
the maintainer has not used this patch, instead fixing the problem by
renaming the files by hand, presumably because the change is much
smaller and easier to verify for sarge.  Hopefully this can be
corrected using your patch post-sarge.

I verified the documents of all of the different languages, and didn't
see any problems with the openjade output.

> I also noticed that chapters 6 and 7 were commented out in manual.sgml, not
> sure why, that led to additional errors, and uncommenting them didn't seem to
> cause problems.
>
> I'd be happy to help update the document to a newer version of DocBook and use
> the built in features to place the html output directly into the desired
> directory instead of the hacks in db2any after the Sarge release.

I'm not the maintainer of the package (it's maintained by James
Troup), so this is to let him know of your offer, which I'm sure will
be well appreciated!


Many thanks for all your work,
Roger

- -- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 

iD8DBQFCnfIhVcFcaSW/uEgRAg2WAJ9A9dYjztcYGnN+k63xT/3D1C56mgCdENqA
Gr71VQRJ6nBVFcK/XNFxWJw=
=hnDX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: libid3tag: lost shlibs on coversion to cdbs.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 310311 -1
Bug#310311: lost versioned shlibs in new version
Bug 310311 cloned as bug 311544.

> reassign -1 libid3tag
Bug#311544: lost versioned shlibs in new version
Bug reassigned from package `libmad' to `libid3tag'.

> tags -1 = sid pending
Bug#311544: lost versioned shlibs in new version
Tags were: fixed pending sid
Tags set to: sid, pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of crossfire 1.6.0.dfsg.1-4

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 311439 + fixed
Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 311439, tagging 311439

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 311439 - fixed
Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check
Tags were: fixed
Tags removed: fixed

>  #This bug still affects sarge, as the fixed package is only in sid
> tags 311439 + sarge
Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311544: marked as done (lost versioned shlibs in new version)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:47:59 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311544: fixed in libid3tag 0.15.1b-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2005 00:16:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 17:16:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Da0cO-0002hb-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 17:16:28 -0700
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1Da0f4-00086D-W9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 23 May 2005 02:19:15 +0200
Received: from p54a3b601.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.182.1] helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1Da0fb-0003Zd-OI
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 23 May 2005 02:19:47 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Da0c0-0002EC-Uw
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 May 2005 02:16:04 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lost versioned shlibs in new version
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 02:16:04 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libmad
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

Since version 0.15.1b-2, libmad0 has an unversioned shlibs. I guess
this is an unintentional change during the conversion to cdbs?

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 311544-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 19:51:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 12:51:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdZFh-0005dK-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 12:51:45 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdZC3-0001JF-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:47:59 -0400
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311544: fixed in libid3tag 0.15.1b-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:47:59 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: libid3tag
Source-Version: 0.15.1b-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libid3tag, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libid3tag0-dev_0.15.1b-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libi/libid3tag/libid3tag0-dev_0.15.1b-7_i386.deb
libid3tag0_0.15.1b-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libi/libid3tag/libid3tag0_0.15.1b-7_i386.deb
libid3tag_0.15.1b-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libi/libid3tag/libid3tag_0.15.1b-7.diff.gz
libid3tag_0.15.1b-7.dsc
  to pool/main/libi/libid3tag/libid3tag_0.15.1b-7.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libid3tag package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL

Processed: Tagging with 'patch'

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 307103 + patch
Bug#307103: clara: segmentation fault at startup
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307103: Tagging with 'patch'

[Recai Oktas]

tag 307103 + patch
thanks

Hi,

Thank you very much for your feedback.  Since we have a working patch
for this bug, I'm tagging it.  CCing to -release as they may want to
consider a fixed 'clara' for Sarge.  I've prepared an NMUed package for
their convenience:

http://l10n-turkish.alioth.debian.org/debian/clara_20031214-1.1_i386.deb

Regards,

-- 
roktas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#311397: same trace in english

[Stephane List]

debian:~# env LANG=C apt-get install libcommoncpp2-1.3
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libcommoncpp2-1.3
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 72 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 226kB of archives.
After unpacking 717kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main libcommoncpp2-1.3 1.3.10-2
[226kB]
Fetched 226kB in 9s (24.2kB/s)
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
(Reading database ... 200809 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libcommoncpp2-1.3 (from
.../libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-2_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-2_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libccext2-1.3.so.1.0.6', which is also in
package libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-2_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311397: resolved on my PC

[Stephane List]

With : apt-get remove libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102

I don't have the problem anymore.
I don't know where this version of the package comes from ???

For me, you can close the bug if I was the only one having the problem
on the planet.

Regards
Stephane


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311563: qt dialog windows are invisible on debian amd64 with windowmaker

[Alexander Fieroch]

Package: wmaker
Version: 0.91.0-7.2
Severity: grave


Hello,

there is no dialog window of any qt-application opening visible with
windowmaker. I've testet licq, qtparted, k3b and the kernel build
configurator "make xconfig". It's always reproducable and makes
qt-applications useless with wmaker. The window frame of each qt
application is visible, but opening any dialog window is not.
Pressing ALT+TAB I can see that there should be the just opened dialog
windows but I can't switch to any of them and they seem to be invisible.
It is working with windowmaker for ia32 debian and other windowmanager
like gnome for amd64, so it seems to be a bug in windowmaker for amd64.

Regards,
Alexander













-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Merge postinst failure

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> merge 306595 311557
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Bug#311557: xmltex fails to install
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `severity' don't match:
 #306595 has `important';
 #311557 has `grave'

> severity 306595 grave
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 311557

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 311557 sid
Bug#311557: xmltex fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311557: appears to be present in 1.9-9 (sid) only

[Don Armstrong]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude install xmltex
Password:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
  passivetex
The following packages have been kept back:
  libpq3 postgresql postgresql-client
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  passivetex xmltex
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Need to get 559kB of archives. After unpacking 1343kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Y
Writing extended state information... Done
Get:1 http://debian.usc.edu unstable/main xmltex 1.9-8 [196kB]
Get:2 http://debian.usc.edu unstable/main passivetex 1.25-2 [363kB]
Fetched 559kB in 0s (2277kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package xmltex.
(Reading database ... 120566 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking xmltex (from .../archives/xmltex_1.9-8_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package passivetex.
Unpacking passivetex (from .../passivetex_1.25-2_all.deb) ...
Setting up xmltex (1.9-8) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
texhash: Updating /home/don/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Checking for TeX format files  we depend on ... done.
Creating xmltex format files...
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/xmltex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfxmltex.fmt installed.
Done.
texhash: Updating /home/don/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
texhash: Done.

Setting up passivetex (1.25-2) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ bts tag 311557 sid


Don Armstrong


-- 
"Ban cryptography! Yes. Let's also ban pencils, pens and paper, since
criminals can use them to draw plans of the joint they are casing or
even, god forbid, create one time pads to pass uncrackable codes to
each other. Ban open spaces since criminals could use them to converse
with each other out of earshot of the police. Let's ban flags since
they could be used to pass secret messages in semaphore. In fact let's
just ban all forms of verbal and non-verbal communication -- let's see
those criminals make plans now!"

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311557: xmltex fails to install

[Roger Leigh]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
> *** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.h656Jr for details

Please can you send this file as an attachment.


Thanks,
Roger

- -- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 

iD8DBQFCnjOYVcFcaSW/uEgRAtxtAJ9bihapreTfBQ9DLInjU9KgklUc+gCggfeM
1dzDTsututpX7y0PzDetRUM=
=lEi2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308879: tinyca: another patch

[Jasper Spaans]

Hi,

I was being troubled by the same bug, and was able to solve it some time ago
using the following quick & dirty patch:

--- OpenSSL.pm  2005-02-20 22:03:03.0 +0100
+++ OpenSSL.pm~ 2005-05-17 12:28:37.0 +0200
@@ -827,8 +827,8 @@
$ret = $?>>8;
 
if(($ret != 0 && $opts->{'cmd'} ne 'crl') ||
-  ($ret != 0 && $opts->{'outform'} ne 'TEXT' && $opts->{'cmd'} eq 'crl') ||
-  ($ret != 1 && $opts->{'outform'} eq 'TEXT' && $opts->{'cmd'} eq 'crl')) 
{ 
+  ($ret != 0 && $opts->{'outform'} ne 'TEXT' && $opts->{'cmd'} eq 'crl')) {
+# ||   ($ret != 1 && $opts->{'outform'} eq 'TEXT' && $opts->{'cmd'} eq 
'crl')) { 
   unlink($file);
   return($ret, undef, $ext);
} else {

which seemed to fix the problem. This might be a bogus patch though, otoh,
it doesn't eat data. However, handle with care etc.


Jasper
-- 
Jasper Spaans   http://jsp.vs19.net/
 00:23:15 up 10332 days, 15:10, 0 users, load average: 5.05 5.17 5.05
 There already is an object oriented version of COBOL.
 It's called "ADD ONE TO COBOL GIVING COBOL."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Merge related

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> merge 306595 311557
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Bug#311557: xmltex fails to install
Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
Merged 262395 306595 311557.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Issues that only affect amd64 are at most severity important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 311563 important
Bug#311563: qt dialog windows are invisible on debian amd64 with windowmaker
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: important -> grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package slapd
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: slapd

> tags 311491 sarge
Bug#311491: slapd stops functioning almost completely if a CPU consuming 
process runs at the same time
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

> severity 311491 grave
Bug#311491: slapd stops functioning almost completely if a CPU consuming 
process runs at the same time
Severity set to `grave'.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311563: Issues that only affect amd64 are at most severity important

[Don Armstrong]

severity 311563 important
thanks

Issues that only affect amd64 (which is not part of an official Debian
release) are at most severity important.


Don Armstrong

-- 
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311149: marked as done (libcommoncpp2: FTBFS: dh_installdocs: cp: cannot stat `doc/html': No such file or directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:32:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311149: fixed in libcommoncpp2 1.3.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2005 09:36:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 29 02:36:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DcKDi-0001Qj-00; Sun, 29 May 2005 02:36:34 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EB143BC04D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:36:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903B73BC0D5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:36:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 5EA7426136; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:36:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 11:36:33 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libcommoncpp2: FTBFS: dh_installdocs: cp: cannot stat `doc/html': No 
such file or directory
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libcommoncpp2
Version: 1.3.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid


Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
dh_installdocs
cp: cannot stat `doc/html': No such file or directory
dh_installdocs: command returned error code 256
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1



Kurt


---
Received: (at 311149-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 22:39:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 15:39:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdbsD-00056M-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:39:42 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdblE-00073A-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:32:28 -0400
From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311149: fixed in libcommoncpp2 1.3.10-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:32:28 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: libcommoncpp2
Source-Version: 1.3.10-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libcommoncpp2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libc/libcommoncpp2/libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-3_i386.deb
libcommoncpp2-dev_1.3.10-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libc/libcommoncpp2/libcommoncpp2-dev_1.3.10-3_i386.deb
libcommoncpp2_1.3.10-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libc/libcommoncpp2/libcommoncpp2_1.3.10-3.diff.gz
libcommoncpp2_1.3.10-3.dsc
  to pool/main/libc/libcommoncpp2/libcommoncpp2_1.3.10-3.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libcommoncpp2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  1 Jun 2005 22:41:13 +0100
Source: libcommoncpp2
Binary: libcommoncpp2-1.3 libcommoncpp2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark

Bug#311397: marked as done (libcommoncpp2-1.3: impossible to install the package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:32:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311397: fixed in libcommoncpp2 1.3.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2005 18:23:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 31 11:23:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 56.92.96-84.rev.gaoland.net (smTp.neuf.fr) [84.96.92.56] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdBOs-0001zC-00; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:23:38 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.97.1.254]) by sp604003mt.gpm.neuf.ld
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 31 May 2005 20:23:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:22:39 +0200
From: Stephane List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libcommoncpp2-1.3: impossible to install the package
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libcommoncpp2-1.3
Version: .../libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-2_i386.deb
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


When I try to install, I get the following error :


D=C3=A9paquetage de libcommoncpp2-1.3 (=C3=A0 partir de
=2E.../libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-2_i386.deb) ...
dpkg=C2=A0: erreur de traitement de
/var/cache/apt/archives/libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-2_i386.deb (--unpack=
)=C2=A0:
 tentative de remplacement de =C2=AB=C2=A0/usr/lib/libccext2-1.3.so.1=
.0.6=C2=A0=C2=BB, qui
 appartient aussi au paquet libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102
 dpkg-deb: sous-processus paste tu=C3=A9 par le signal (Relais bris=
=C3=A9 (pipe))
 Des erreurs ont =C3=A9t=C3=A9 rencontr=C3=A9es pendant l'ex=C3=A9cut=
ion=C2=A0:
  /var/cache/apt/archives/libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-2_i386.deb
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
 =20


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=3Dfr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dfr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)

Versions of packages libcommoncpp2-1.3 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared li=
braries an
ii  libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13   GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.6-5The GNU Standard C++ Lib=
rary v3


---
Received: (at 311397-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 22:39:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 15:39:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdbsE-00056Y-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:39:42 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdblE-00073C-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:32:28 -0400
From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311397: fixed in libcommoncpp2 1.3.10-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:32:28 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: libcommoncpp2
Source-Version: 1.3.10-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libcommoncpp2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libc/libcommoncpp2/libcommoncpp2-1.3_1.3.10-3_i386.deb
libcommoncpp2-dev_1.3.10-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libc/libcommoncpp2/libcommoncpp2-dev_1.3.10-3_i386.deb
libcommoncpp2_1.3.10-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libc/libcommoncpp2/libcommoncpp2_1.3.10-3.diff.gz
libcommoncpp2_1.3.10-3.dsc
  to pool/main/libc/libcommoncpp2/libcommoncpp2_1.3.10-3.dsc



A summ

Bug#311572: linuxsampler: ftbfs [sparc] aclocal: Command not found

[Blars Blarson]

Package: linuxsampler
Version: 0.3.cvs20050531-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source


linuxsampler fails to build from source on sparc and other buildds,
duplicated on sparc pbuilder.


dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
/usr/bin/make -f Makefile.cvs
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/linuxsampler-0.3.cvs20050531'
make[1]: aclocal: Command not found
make[1]: *** [configure] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/linuxsampler-0.3.cvs20050531'
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 2



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311575: rt2500: ftbfs [sparc] dh_testdir: Command not found

[Blars Blarson]

Package: rt2500
Version: 1.1.0+cvs20050530-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

rt2500 fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds, duplicated
on sparc pbuilder.

dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is sparc
 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Removed mysql-nonfree, mysql-nonfree-4.1 from unstable

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 308680
Bug#308680: RM: mysql-nonfree,mysql-nonfree-4.1 -- RoM; undistributeable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308680: Removed mysql-nonfree, mysql-nonfree-4.1 from unstable

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

reopen 308680
thanks

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:47:29PM -0400, Debian Archive Maintenance wrote:
> We believe that the request you reported is now fixed; the following
> package(s) have been removed from unstable:
> 
>  mysql-doc |   4.0.24-1 | all
> mysql-doc-4.1 |  4.1.10a-1 | all
> mysql-nonfree |   4.0.24-1 | source
> mysql-nonfree-4.1 |  4.1.10a-1 | source
> 
> Reason: RoM; undistributeable

Right, and this 'undistributable' still holds, as I noted just before
actually removing over here, so reopening as these packages erroneously
got reintroduced.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 311491, severity of 311491 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 311491 - sarge
Bug#311491: slapd stops functioning almost completely if a CPU consuming 
process runs at the same time
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge

> severity 311491 important
Bug#311491: slapd stops functioning almost completely if a CPU consuming 
process runs at the same time
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311557: appears to be present in 1.9-9 (sid) only

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:21:31PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude install xmltex
> Password:
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> Reading task descriptions... Done
> The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
>   passivetex
> The following packages have been kept back:
>   libpq3 postgresql postgresql-client
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   passivetex xmltex
> 0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
> Need to get 559kB of archives. After unpacking 1343kB will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Y
> Writing extended state information... Done
> Get:1 http://debian.usc.edu unstable/main xmltex 1.9-8 [196kB]
> Get:2 http://debian.usc.edu unstable/main passivetex 1.25-2 [363kB]
> Fetched 559kB in 0s (2277kB/s)
> Selecting previously deselected package xmltex.
> (Reading database ... 120566 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking xmltex (from .../archives/xmltex_1.9-8_all.deb) ...
> Selecting previously deselected package passivetex.
> Unpacking passivetex (from .../passivetex_1.25-2_all.deb) ...
> Setting up xmltex (1.9-8) ...
> Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
> texhash: Updating /home/don/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
> texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
> texhash: Done.
> Checking for TeX format files  we depend on ... done.
> Creating xmltex format files...
> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/xmltex.fmt installed.
> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfxmltex.fmt installed.
> Done.
> texhash: Updating /home/don/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
> texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
> texhash: Done.
> 
> Setting up passivetex (1.25-2) ...
> Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
> 
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> Reading task descriptions... Done

Well, this bug is now merged with 262395, but they seem to be opposite sides
of the same bugfix; the dependency on efmt is a result of the changes in
1.9-9 that were supposed to fix 262395/306595.

I don't really know anything about fmtutil (other than that it's a chronic
RC irritant).  What's the variable here that causes some systems to need
.fmt and some to need .efmt?  It doesn't seem to be the version of tetex
packages installed, at least.

Supposing for the moment we're out of time before release, which version
would we want to go with -- the 1.9-8 version that assumes .fmt, or the
1.9-9 version that assumes .efmt?

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#311557: patch to fix this by checking to see whether efmt or fmt is supposed to be made

[Don Armstrong]

The following rather trivial patch seems to clear up this issue here.
[Someone better at shell could probably make it slightly cleaner...
just thank $DEITY that I didn't decide to write it in perl. ;-)]

The basic idea is just to see if fmtutil is going to make an efmt or
fmt, and then check for the existence of the appropriate file.


Don Armstrong

-- 
Of course, there are ceases where only a rare individual will have the
vision to perceive a system which governs many people's lives; a
system which had never before even been recognized as a system; then
such people often devote their lives to convincing other people that
the system really is there and that it aught to be exited from. 
 -- Douglas R. Hofstadter _G� Escher Bach. Eternal Golden Braid_

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- old/xmltex-1.9/debian/postinst  2005-06-01 20:53:42.0 -0700
+++ xmltex-1.9/debian/postinst  2005-06-01 20:51:21.0 -0700
@@ -105,15 +105,28 @@
 # check whether it actually worked, since the texconfig program
 # doesn't exit non-zero
 
+if grep -q '^xmltex[[:space:]]*tex' $FMTDIR/40xmltex.cnf; then
+   xml_fmt="xmltex.fmt";
+else
+   xml_fmt="xmltex.efmt";
+fi;
+
+if grep -q '^pdfxmltex[[:space:]]*pdftex' $FMTDIR/40xmltex.cnf; then
+   pdf_fmt="pdfxmltex.fmt";
+else
+   pdf_fmt="pdfxmltex.efmt";
+fi;
+
+
 # file exists test
 local goterror
 goterror=false
-if ! kpsewhich xmltex.efmt > /dev/null ; then
-warn "ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found"
+if ! kpsewhich $xml_fmt > /dev/null ; then
+warn "ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump ($xml_fmt) cannot be found"
 goterror=true
 fi
-if ! kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt > /dev/null ; then
-warn "ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found"
+if ! kpsewhich $pdf_fmt > /dev/null ; then
+warn "ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump ($pdf_fmt) cannot be found"
 goterror=true
 fi
 

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

[Craig Small]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> /etc/printcap is a "conffile" of lpr-ppd ; if
> lpr-ppd is removed, /etc/printcap will still be there ;
> but if you purge  lpr-ppd  , dpkg will delete /etc/printcap ,
> since it is not a conffile of lprng

lprng used to have /etc/printcap but for very good reasons I can no
longer remember (perhaps that conffiles need to be only for a single
package) it no longer has a printcap.

  - Craig
-- 
Craig Small  GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/   MIEE Debian developer
csmall at : enc.com.au  ieee.org   debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311557: (no subject)

[Don Armstrong]

Eugene Konev reminded me (in #debian-bugs) that a fix is needed to the
postrm as well. Since kpsewhich can return both fmt and efmt, the
trivial thing is to look for both:

# remove fmt and efmt files
XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true
PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true
rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT


The more complete attached patch does that.


Don Armstrong

-- 
America was far better suited to be the World's Movie Star. The
world's tequila-addled pro-league bowler. The world's acerbic bi-polar
stand-up comedian. Anything but a somber and tedious nation of
socially responsible centurions.
 -- Bruce Sterling, _Distraction_ p122

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- old/xmltex-1.9/debian/postinst  2005-06-01 20:53:42.0 -0700
+++ xmltex-1.9/debian/postinst  2005-06-01 20:51:21.0 -0700
@@ -105,15 +105,28 @@
 # check whether it actually worked, since the texconfig program
 # doesn't exit non-zero
 
+if grep -q '^xmltex[[:space:]]*tex' $FMTDIR/40xmltex.cnf; then
+   xml_fmt="xmltex.fmt";
+else
+   xml_fmt="xmltex.efmt";
+fi;
+
+if grep -q '^pdfxmltex[[:space:]]*pdftex' $FMTDIR/40xmltex.cnf; then
+   pdf_fmt="pdfxmltex.fmt";
+else
+   pdf_fmt="pdfxmltex.efmt";
+fi;
+
+
 # file exists test
 local goterror
 goterror=false
-if ! kpsewhich xmltex.efmt > /dev/null ; then
-warn "ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found"
+if ! kpsewhich $xml_fmt > /dev/null ; then
+warn "ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump ($xml_fmt) cannot be found"
 goterror=true
 fi
-if ! kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt > /dev/null ; then
-warn "ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found"
+if ! kpsewhich $pdf_fmt > /dev/null ; then
+warn "ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump ($pdf_fmt) cannot be found"
 goterror=true
 fi
 
--- old/xmltex-1.9/debian/postrm2005-06-01 20:53:42.0 -0700
+++ xmltex-1.9/debian/postrm2005-06-01 21:30:33.0 -0700
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
 
 case "$1" in
 remove)
-   # remove fmt files
-   XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt) || true
-   PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt) || true
+   # remove fmt and efmt files
+   XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true
+   PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true
rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT
 
# remove fmt file logs

Processed: Re: Bug#311570: ipkungfu: seems to miss configuration files and executable

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 311570 grave
Bug#311570: ipkungfu: seems to miss configuration files and executable
Severity set to `grave'.

> tags 311570 = confirmed sid
Bug#311570: ipkungfu: seems to miss configuration files and executable
There were no tags set.
Tags set to: confirmed, sid

> retitle 311570 ipkungfu: man, executable & conf files missing from .deb 
> packages
Bug#311570: ipkungfu: seems to miss configuration files and executable
Changed Bug title.

> thanks control
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311526: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:19:26PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> tags 311526 confirmed sarge sid
> thanks

> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:06:24PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > Package: nagios-common
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> > 
> > From nagios-common's postrm:
> > 
> > | rm -Rf {/var/cache,/var/run,/var/log,/etc}/nagios
> > 
> > Removing /etc/nagios is a _bad_ idea, especially when you still have
> > other nagios related packages like nagios-nrpe-server installed.

> yeah, this is definitely a bad idea.  i think this particular line
> predates our management of the package, which is probably how it
> slipped under our radar.  

> i'm cc'ing debian-release on this one... coming up with a fix for this
> shouldn't be too complicated or take too long and i can probably get it
> done very late this evening (EDT).  is this too late for sarge?  if so,
> i'll put the update in for the first sarge update.

I would very much like to see this fixed for sarge, but it seems to now be
quie late in the evening EDT.  Is this something that still has a chance of
being uploaded before tomorrow's dinstall?

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#262395: and yet another minor issue

[Don Armstrong]

Yet another minor issue, which I found because I had both xmltex.emft
and xmltex.fmt laying about... (probably pathological, but trivial to
fix):


XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true
PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true
LOGDIR=$(dirname $(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt|head -n 1)) || true
rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT

# remove fmt file logs
rm -f $LOGDIR/xmltex.log $LOGDIR/pdfxmltex.log


Don Armstrong

-- 
America was far better suited to be the World's Movie Star. The
world's tequila-addled pro-league bowler. The world's acerbic bi-polar
stand-up comedian. Anything but a somber and tedious nation of
socially responsible centurions.
 -- Bruce Sterling, _Distraction_ p122

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- old/xmltex-1.9/debian/postinst  2005-06-01 20:53:42.0 -0700
+++ xmltex-1.9/debian/postinst  2005-06-01 20:51:21.0 -0700
@@ -105,15 +105,28 @@
 # check whether it actually worked, since the texconfig program
 # doesn't exit non-zero
 
+if grep -q '^xmltex[[:space:]]*tex' $FMTDIR/40xmltex.cnf; then
+   xml_fmt="xmltex.fmt";
+else
+   xml_fmt="xmltex.efmt";
+fi;
+
+if grep -q '^pdfxmltex[[:space:]]*pdftex' $FMTDIR/40xmltex.cnf; then
+   pdf_fmt="pdfxmltex.fmt";
+else
+   pdf_fmt="pdfxmltex.efmt";
+fi;
+
+
 # file exists test
 local goterror
 goterror=false
-if ! kpsewhich xmltex.efmt > /dev/null ; then
-warn "ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found"
+if ! kpsewhich $xml_fmt > /dev/null ; then
+warn "ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump ($xml_fmt) cannot be found"
 goterror=true
 fi
-if ! kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt > /dev/null ; then
-warn "ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found"
+if ! kpsewhich $pdf_fmt > /dev/null ; then
+warn "ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump ($pdf_fmt) cannot be found"
 goterror=true
 fi
 
--- old/xmltex-1.9/debian/postrm2005-06-01 20:53:42.0 -0700
+++ xmltex-1.9/debian/postrm2005-06-01 21:53:06.0 -0700
@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@
 
 case "$1" in
 remove)
-   # remove fmt files
-   XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt) || true
-   PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt) || true
+   # remove fmt and efmt files
+   XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true
+   PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true
+   LOGDIR=$(dirname $(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt|head -n 1)) || true
rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT
 
# remove fmt file logs
-   LOGDIR=$(dirname $XMLTEXFMT) || true
rm -f $LOGDIR/xmltex.log $LOGDIR/pdfxmltex.log
 
# disable conf files

Bug#244382: marked as done (setools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 01:06:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This has been fixed for a while
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2004 09:09:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 18 02:09:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BF8Il-0006ri-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 02:09:23 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 1BF8Il-000581-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 05:09:23 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BF8JB-0007Dw-Uy
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 02:09:50 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: setools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 02:09:49 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: setools
Severity: serious
Version: 1.3-1

>From my build log:

...
gcc  -c replcon.c -DSUPPORTED_FILESYSTEMS='"ext2 ext3"' -Wall -O2 
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0/pango 
-DDEFAULT_POLICY='"/etc/security/selinux/src/policy.conf"' 
-DSEINFO_VERSION_NUM='"1.1"' -DSESEARCH_VERSION_NUM='"1.0"' 
-DREPLCON_VERSION_NUM='"1.0"' -DFINDCON_VERSION_NUM='"1.0"' -I.. -I../libapol
replcon.c:16:29: selinux/selinux.h: No such file or directory
replcon.c:17:29: selinux/context.h: No such file or directory
replcon.c:299: error: parse error before "get_security_context"
replcon.c:300: warning: return type defaults to `int'
...
make[2]: *** [replcon.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/setools-1.3/secmds'
make[1]: *** [secmds] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/setools-1.3'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

Adding libselinux1-dev to the Build-Depends lets the build get
farther, but then later it fails with:

...
cd secmds; make install
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/setools-1.3/secmds'
install -m 755 seinfo sesearch replcon findcon 
/tmp/buildd/setools-1.3/debian/setools/usr/bin;
chcon system_u:object_r:setfiles_exec_t 
/tmp/buildd/setools-1.3/debian/setools/usr/bin/replcon
make[2]: chcon: Command not found
make[2]: *** [install] Error 127
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/setools-1.3/secmds'
make[1]: *** [install-secmds] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/setools-1.3'
make: *** [install] Error 2

I cannot find any package containing chcon with the
packages.debian.org search.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 244382-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 06:11:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 23:11:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net 
(glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com) [12.107.230.171] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ddiv2-0002zj-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:11:04 -0700
Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-2) with 
ESMTP id j52666fg006839
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 01:06:06 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id 
j52666ZQ006838;
Thu, 2 

Bug#279726: marked as done (CAN-2003-0541: null pointer dereference security hole)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:21:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #279726: CAN-2003-0541: null pointer dereference security hole
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2004 21:51:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 04 13:51:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CPpVh-0002B0-00; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:51:13 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB1C17E95
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu,  4 Nov 2004 21:51:12 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CC5866E122; Thu,  4 Nov 2004 16:52:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:52:50 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: CAN-2003-0541: null pointer dereference security hole
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg"
Content-Disposition: inline


--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gtkhtml
Version: 1.0.4-5.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch

According to CAN-2003-0541, "gtkhtml before 1.1.10, as used in
Evolution, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash)
via a malformed message that causes a null pointer dereference."

There's some more info in the redhat advisory
(http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-264.html):

  Versions of GtkHTML prior to 1.1.10 contain a bug when handling HTML
  messages. Alan Cox discovered that certain malformed messages could cause
  the Evolution mail component to crash due to a null pointer dereference in
  the GtkHTML library. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project
  (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2003-0541 to this issue.

  Users of Evolution are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages, which
  contain GtkHTML version 1.1.10 correcting this issue.

Debian's evolution package is built with gtkhtml3.2, which is a much newer
version and not vulnerable. So evolution is safe, but there is always
the possibility that something else built against the old version of gtkhtml
could be exploited by this hole.

Of the software in Debian, only gnuvd-gnome is still linked to this library
and likely to feed untrusted html to gtkhtml. I have not checked to see if
the hole can be exploited using gnuvd-gnome.

I've attached a patch which I took from the Mandrake security advisory.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)

Versions of packages gtkhtml depends on:
ii  bonobo1.0.22-2.2 The GNOME Bonobo System.
ii  gdk-imlib11.9.14-16  imaging library for use with g=
tk (
ii  libart2   1.4.2-19   The GNOME canvas widget - runt=
ime=20
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-4Open-source version of SGI's a=
udio
ii  libbonobo21.0.22-2.2 The GNOME Bonobo library.
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18   GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
pn  libcapplet1  Not found.
ii  libdb33.2.9-20   Berkeley v3 Database Libraries=
 [ru
ii  libesd0   0.2.35-2   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Sha=
red=20
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.7-2.2  FreeType 2 font engine, shared=
 lib
ii  libgal23  0.24-1.3   G App Libs (run time library)
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2  0.

Bug#311397: resolved on my PC

[Mark Purcell]

Thanks Stephane,

It was a subtle problem, which I was aware of before I uploaded the package.

Originally the package was called libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102, but the soname 
changed (which I didn't notice) and uploaded libcomoncpp2-1.0-0c102 
(1.3.10-1).

Since the soname had changed I needed to rename, which is where 
libcommoncpp2-1.3 (1.3.10-2) came from. I uploaded this next version quicky, 
but didn't include a conflicts for the rare case that someone (like yourself) 
did download the 1.3.10-1 version of the package for the couple of days it 
was in the archive.

Anyway I have now uploaded a new version which does have the conflicts 
statement and should ;-) work correctly for everyone.

Thanks for your reports.

Mark

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 22:06, Stephane List wrote:
> With : apt-get remove libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102
>
> I don't have the problem anymore.
> I don't know where this version of the package comes from ???
>
> For me, you can close the bug if I was the only one having the problem
> on the planet.
>
> Regards
> Stephane


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311557: appears to be present in 1.9-9 (sid) only

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:01:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, this bug is now merged with 262395, but they seem to be opposite sides
> of the same bugfix; the dependency on efmt is a result of the changes in
> 1.9-9 that were supposed to fix 262395/306595.
> 
> I don't really know anything about fmtutil (other than that it's a chronic
> RC irritant).  What's the variable here that causes some systems to need
> .fmt and some to need .efmt?  It doesn't seem to be the version of tetex
> packages installed, at least.
> 
> Supposing for the moment we're out of time before release, which version
> would we want to go with -- the 1.9-8 version that assumes .fmt, or the
> 1.9-9 version that assumes .efmt?
> 

AFAIK the choice of enhanced or normal tex engine is related to the use of 
the new NTS primitives, so it's due to the specific sheet (xmltex in
this case). Tetex is compatible with both engines, and there are other
sheets that use just one of them or both. Someone who knows better
the inner requirements of xmltex should have a guess... I'm a poor
texnician, not a wizard :) I can just guess that probably etex is the
way to go, but postinst needs a decent fix as suggested in my previous
followups, in any case.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311482: marked as done (apt-listbugs: Strange config file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:17:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311482: fixed in apt-listbugs 0.0.49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 08:59:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 01:59:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail2.bund.de (fw-berlin.bund.de) [194.95.177.104] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdP43-0007In-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 01:59:03 -0700
Received: by fw-berlin.bund.de (8.11.6p2G/8.11.6) id j518wUU11722
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:58:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from localhost) by m2.fw.bln.ivbb.bund.de (MSCAN) id 
4/m2.fw.bln.ivbb.bund.de/smtp-gw/mscan; Wed Jun 1 10:58:30
 2005
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-listbugs: Strange config file
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:58:38 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2005 08:58:24.0861 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[11B558D0:01C56688]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.48
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1

Apt-listbugs stores the bugs it just listed in
 /etc/apt/listbugs/ignore_bugs
This results in a change in /etc after nearly every apt run which
definitely sucks.

Kind regards and thanks for maintaing apt-listbugs

 Andreas.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii  apt   0.5.28.6   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libdpkg-ruby1.8   0.3.1  modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii  libintl-gettext-ruby1.8   0.11-5 Gettext wrapper for Ruby 1.8
ii  libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8]  1.8.2-7Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-1Interface of expat for the scripti
ii  ruby  1.8.2-1An interpreter of object-oriented 

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 311482-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 06:21:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 23:21:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ddj58-0005Ac-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:21:30 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ddj0o-0005EV-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:17:02 -0400
From: Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311482: fixed in apt-listbugs 0.0.49
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:17:02 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: apt-listbugs
Source-Version: 0.0.49

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-listbugs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-listbugs_0.0.49.dsc
  to pool/main/a/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs_0.0.49.dsc
apt-listbugs_0.0.49.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs_0.0.49.tar.gz
apt-listbugs_0.0.49_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs_0.0.49_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian