Re: 11.2 planning
On Tue, 23, Nov, 2021 at 08:12:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt spoke thus.. > Hi, > > It's (a little past) time that we organised the next point release. As > an "every other" release, this time will only be for stable. > > Any of the first three weekends of December would work for me, although > the 4th is my least preferred as it means freezing over the coming > weekend and I'm not sure if I'll have time to do a fair job of dealing > with things before that. > > tl;dr, suggested dates: > > December 4th [least preferable for me] > December 11th > December 18th I can do the 11th or 18th. Mark -- Mark Hymers signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: 11.2 planning
Hi El 25 de noviembre de 2021 17:47:41 CET, Mark Hymers escribió: >On Tue, 23, Nov, 2021 at 08:12:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt spoke thus.. >> Hi, >> >> It's (a little past) time that we organised the next point release. As >> an "every other" release, this time will only be for stable. >> >> Any of the first three weekends of December would work for me, although >> the 4th is my least preferred as it means freezing over the coming >> weekend and I'm not sure if I'll have time to do a fair job of dealing >> with things before that. >> >> tl;dr, suggested dates: >> >> December 4th [least preferable for me] >> December 11th >> December 18th > >I can do the 11th or 18th. > >Mark > Fpr press/website, I'm available the 11th and the 18th. Kind regards -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona Sent with K-9 mail
Re: Closing the window for the l10n updates
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sat, 24 Jul 2021 02:03:35 +0200): > Holger Wansing (2021-07-23): > > Cyril Brulebois wrote (Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:11:44 +0200): > > > From a quick look around, based on [1], it seems arcboot-installer has a > > > non-l10n change but that seems harmless (Uploaders update); I'd rather > > > > arcboot-installer is no longer relevant for the bullseye release, > > since it's mips arch, which is no release arch for bullseye (and this > > is why I ignored that for months already), or did I miss something? > > You're absolutely right; maybe we should retire this package from the > l10n machinery, so that it no longer shows up in translations.txt? I have now introduced a change on that: the script for generation of translations.txt now uses the list of l10n- relevant D-I packages in packages/po/packages_list. So the above issue should be gone now. Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
