Hi, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote (Sat, 24 Jul 2021 02:03:35 +0200): > Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> (2021-07-23): > > Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote (Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:11:44 +0200): > > > From a quick look around, based on [1], it seems arcboot-installer has a > > > non-l10n change but that seems harmless (Uploaders update); I'd rather > > > > arcboot-installer is no longer relevant for the bullseye release, > > since it's mips arch, which is no release arch for bullseye (and this > > is why I ignored that for months already), or did I miss something? > > You're absolutely right; maybe we should retire this package from the > l10n machinery, so that it no longer shows up in translations.txt?
I have now introduced a change on that: the script for generation of translations.txt now uses the list of l10n- relevant D-I packages in packages/po/packages_list. So the above issue should be gone now. Holger -- Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
