busybox_1.19.3-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
busybox-static_1.19.3-7_i386.deb
  to main/b/busybox/busybox-static_1.19.3-7_i386.deb
busybox-syslogd_1.19.3-7_all.deb
  to main/b/busybox/busybox-syslogd_1.19.3-7_all.deb
busybox-udeb_1.19.3-7_i386.udeb
  to main/b/busybox/busybox-udeb_1.19.3-7_i386.udeb
busybox_1.19.3-7.debian.tar.gz
  to main/b/busybox/busybox_1.19.3-7.debian.tar.gz
busybox_1.19.3-7.dsc
  to main/b/busybox/busybox_1.19.3-7.dsc
busybox_1.19.3-7_i386.deb
  to main/b/busybox/busybox_1.19.3-7_i386.deb
udhcpc_1.19.3-7_i386.deb
  to main/b/busybox/udhcpc_1.19.3-7_i386.deb
udhcpd_1.19.3-7_i386.deb
  to main/b/busybox/udhcpd_1.19.3-7_i386.deb


Changes:
busybox (1:1.19.3-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * enable stat applet for deb & static
  * enable less applet for deb ("more" does not quite work)
and enable some options for it in static build
  * enabled a few options for top and ps applets in deb, taken from static
  * enabled NFS mount (Note: only NFSv2 and v3, not v4, and only on Linux)
(Closes: #573056, #348664)
  * enabled microcom for deb build, taken from static
  * relaxed the "links" subpackages version dependencies from source:Version
to source:Upstream-Version
  * DISabled some questionable applets from static build,
to match regular build:
   - acpid
   - fbset (Closes: #310128) -- removing non-functional fbset
   - adduser, deluser, addgroup, delgroup
   - fsck_minix, mkfs_minix
   - eject
   - makedevs
   - fdflush
   - vlock


Override entries for your package:
busybox-static_1.19.3-7_i386.deb - extra shells
busybox-syslogd_1.19.3-7_all.deb - optional utils
busybox-udeb_1.19.3-7_i386.udeb - extra debian-installer
busybox_1.19.3-7.dsc - source utils
busybox_1.19.3-7_i386.deb - optional utils
udhcpc_1.19.3-7_i386.deb - optional net
udhcpd_1.19.3-7_i386.deb - optional net

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 310128 348664 573056 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1smzwx-0007rh...@franck.debian.org



Bug#257625: marked as done (umount -a does not umount /target/proc)

2012-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:12:49 +0400
with message-id <4f965271.5000...@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
and subject line Re: Bug#257625: umount -a does not umount /target/proc
has caused the Debian Bug report #257625,
regarding umount -a does not umount /target/proc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
257625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=257625
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: busybox-cvs
Severity: normal

umount -a does not seem to umount /target/proc in d-i. Before the umount
-a, /proc/mounts showed /target and /target/proc are mounted, along with
some other things. umount -a complains that /target is busy, and after
it's run both /target and /target/proc remain mounted.

I had to put a fix into prebaseconfig to work around this bug.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.17.1-8

On 04.07.2004 23:17, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: busybox-cvs
> Severity: normal
> 
> umount -a does not seem to umount /target/proc in d-i. Before the umount
> -a, /proc/mounts showed /target and /target/proc are mounted, along with
> some other things. umount -a complains that /target is busy, and after
> it's run both /target and /target/proc remain mounted.
> 
> I had to put a fix into prebaseconfig to work around this bug.

This bug appears to be fixed long time ago.  I tred squeeze version
of busybox and - as far as I can see - it handles this situation
just fine.  I don't know if it actually works in d-i in the exact
place you were complaining about, but multiple deep-nested mounts
gets umounted correctly by sqeeze version of regular busybox build.

Note that the original bugreport did not have a version information,
but it is filed in 2004 (ie, long ago) and against an old incarnation
of busybox package (busybox-cvs).  I guess there was a bug with
umounting of nested mounts in right sequence, long time ago, and
it has been fixed, also long time ago.

I tried busybox from some very old busybox-cvs package from 2004
(taken from snapshot.debian.org), and that one - in regular build,
not an udeb - shows the bug you mentioned.

So I'm closing this bugreprt now, and tagging it as fixed in
squeeze versionb, as it appears to be really fixed.

Thank you!

/mjt

--- End Message ---


Bug#661069: Bug#649448: radeon (evergreen): random-looking pattern of pixels when firmware not installed

2012-04-24 Thread Thomas Kippenberg
Concerning the installer: There was no warning about the missing
firmware for the graphics card.

Thomas Kippenberg




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1335257382.2401.1.ca...@kiste.fritz.box



Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:26, Christian PERRIER  wrote:
>> Major bummers from recent d-i installations:
>> - it's not possible to install with raid+lvm because it fails while
>> installing grub (see #662086).
>> - and kfreebsd daily builds (and installations) are failing;
>>
>> Are these blockers for a1, a2 or even b1?
>
>
> None of these are IMHO blockers for a1. Of course, the RAID+LVM
> failure is a blocker for b1 (either there is visibility that it can be
> fixed, or we need to drop the feature).

Agreed.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkow-hnxgthc1lden51px9ysvkjsrcps6qfgfxjns2z...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Still build failures for kfreebsd-amd64

2012-04-24 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi all!

Steven Chamberlain  writes:
> On 23/04/12 21:25, Robert Millan wrote:
>> El 23 d’abril de 2012 6:56, Christian PERRIER  ha escrit:
 * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:32 buildd@fano build_cdrom_grub
 
 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_grub.log
> ...
>> The log above doesn't display any error message.  Maybe it's related
>> to outdated binaries in testing (see #670184)?
>> 
>> Sorry, I really don't know what to do about this.  Can someone help?
>
> Hi,
>
> I said before that those builds of d-i were done by fano and finzi, but
> they had downtime recently which I think is when they stopped being built.
>
> Christoph, please would you be able to set them up again sometime?  Or
> is there some other reason for this?

Aurelien offered to take care some time back but he's quite busy it
seems. I can probably try to figure out what is needed in the next few
days.

Regards

Christoph

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obqhvsrd@hepworth.siccegge.de



Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi,

6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
organising it for a while.  So before I find something else to distract
myself with, some suggested dates:

May 5/6: Probably doable; would mean we need to close p-u-NEW over the
coming weekend.

May 12/13: York BSP.  Probably not the best time for CDs, given that
Steve would be at the wrong end of the country.  (As will I, but that's
less of an issue)

May 19/20:

May 26/27:

Thoughts / comments?

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1335297961.10121.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org



Bug#436785: partman: relatime default

2012-04-24 Thread Matt Taggart
According to #481653, relatime became the default option starting in
2.6.30. So hopefully partman desn't need to do anything.

There is the page in manual partitioning that let you select options.
Probably that page should indicate relatime is the default and also
have the atime and noatime options available (I don't know if
strictatime and nostrictatime are needed).

-- 
Matt Taggart
tagg...@debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120424204041.94e4...@taggart.lackof.org



Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

2012-04-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
>organising it for a while.  So before I find something else to distract
>myself with, some suggested dates:
>
>May 5/6: Probably doable; would mean we need to close p-u-NEW over the
>coming weekend.

Possible, but not ideal for me.

>May 12/13: York BSP.  Probably not the best time for CDs, given that
>Steve would be at the wrong end of the country.  (As will I, but that's
>less of an issue)

Not a *major* problem for a point release, but it will slow down the
CD release until I can test.

>May 19/20:

Works for me.

>May 26/27:

No chance, I'll be in Hong Kong on a work trip!

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Google-bait:   http://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd
  Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing
  lists asking us to send them to you.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120424202212.gd21...@einval.com



Bug#436785: partman: mount options

2012-04-24 Thread Matt Taggart
Thanks to elmig in #debian-boot here is a list of current mount options
on the manual partitioning page

  noatime, relatime, nodev, nosuid, noexec, ro, sync, usrquota,
  grpquota, user_xattr

Since relatime is the default now, I think at least having an "atime"
to override that is needed. "relatime" could also go away given that
there is no "async", "exec" , etc.

Here are some other things that might be useful to adjust (but some
might give users enough rope to hang themselves and be better changed
by editing fstab)

nodiratime - this option is implied by noatime (but I don't know if
it's implied by relatime). I don't know what the default is.

nobarrier - Barriers are on by default, and you'd probably only disable
them if you don't care about your data (which you might not depending
on what the server is used for)

data={journal|ordered|writeback} - ordered is the default

commit - number of seconds data/metadata should be sync'd, default is 5.
(variable, not a on/off thing)

{min|max}_batch_time - controls how ext4 batches up writes. (variable,
not an on/off thing)

For some of these it might not make sense to have them on the same
checklist page, and maybe some are only available via preseeding.

-- 
Matt Taggart
tagg...@debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120424213350.9fd4...@taggart.lackof.org



Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2012-04-24 Thread Daily build aggregator
Debian installer build overview
---

Failed or old builds:

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:32 buildd@fano build_cdrom_grub 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_grub.log

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:32 buildd@fano build_cdrom_gtk 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:37 buildd@fano build_netboot 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:42 buildd@fano build_netboot-9 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-9.log

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:49 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Apr 05 00:54 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk-9 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk-9.log

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-i386 Apr 05 00:17 buildd@finzi build_cdrom_grub 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_cdrom_grub.log

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-i386 Apr 05 00:21 buildd@finzi build_netboot 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-i386 Apr 05 00:25 buildd@finzi build_netboot-9 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot-9.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:11 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:14 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:16 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:19 buildd@rem build_malta_netboot-2.6 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:22 buildd@rem build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Apr 19 00:26 buildd@rem build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6.log

* OLD BUILD:sparc Apr 22 00:10 buildd@sompek build_cdrom 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/sparc/daily/build_cdrom.log

* OLD BUILD:sparc Apr 22 00:14 buildd@sompek build_netboot 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/sparc/daily/build_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:sparc Apr 22 00:18 buildd@sompek build_miniiso 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/sparc/daily/build_miniiso.log


Totals: 118 builds (0 failed, 18 old)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1smqar-0003fs...@ravel.debian.org