Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:12:49 +0400 with message-id <4f965271.5000...@msgid.tls.msk.ru> and subject line Re: Bug#257625: umount -a does not umount /target/proc has caused the Debian Bug report #257625, regarding umount -a does not umount /target/proc to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 257625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=257625 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: busybox-cvs Severity: normal umount -a does not seem to umount /target/proc in d-i. Before the umount -a, /proc/mounts showed /target and /target/proc are mounted, along with some other things. umount -a complains that /target is busy, and after it's run both /target and /target/proc remain mounted. I had to put a fix into prebaseconfig to work around this bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US -- see shy josignature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1:1.17.1-8 On 04.07.2004 23:17, Joey Hess wrote: > Package: busybox-cvs > Severity: normal > > umount -a does not seem to umount /target/proc in d-i. Before the umount > -a, /proc/mounts showed /target and /target/proc are mounted, along with > some other things. umount -a complains that /target is busy, and after > it's run both /target and /target/proc remain mounted. > > I had to put a fix into prebaseconfig to work around this bug. This bug appears to be fixed long time ago. I tred squeeze version of busybox and - as far as I can see - it handles this situation just fine. I don't know if it actually works in d-i in the exact place you were complaining about, but multiple deep-nested mounts gets umounted correctly by sqeeze version of regular busybox build. Note that the original bugreport did not have a version information, but it is filed in 2004 (ie, long ago) and against an old incarnation of busybox package (busybox-cvs). I guess there was a bug with umounting of nested mounts in right sequence, long time ago, and it has been fixed, also long time ago. I tried busybox from some very old busybox-cvs package from 2004 (taken from snapshot.debian.org), and that one - in regular build, not an udeb - shows the bug you mentioned. So I'm closing this bugreprt now, and tagging it as fixed in squeeze versionb, as it appears to be really fixed. Thank you! /mjt
--- End Message ---