Bug#650926: please include kfreebsd-9 images

2011-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
Package: debian-cd
Version: 3.1.7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Kernel of FreeBSD 9 is already available in unstable and supported by D-I.

Please, could you include kfreebsd-image-9 packages in CD builds?

Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Index: tools/generate_di+k_list
===
--- tools/generate_di+k_list	(revision 2288)
+++ tools/generate_di+k_list	(working copy)
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@
 
 #ifdef ARCH_kfreebsd_amd64
 kfreebsd-image-8-amd64
+kfreebsd-image-9-amd64
 grub-pc
 #endif
 
@@ -211,6 +212,9 @@
 kfreebsd-image-8-486
 kfreebsd-image-8-686
 kfreebsd-image-8-686-smp
+kfreebsd-image-9-486
+kfreebsd-image-9-686
+kfreebsd-image-9-686-smp
 grub-pc
 libc0.1-i686
 #endif


Bug#650859: typical weekend after black friday install, 2011 edition

2011-12-04 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Joey,

On Sat, Dec  3, 2011 at 20:46:45 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:

> The graphics worked ok with stable's kernel; however when I upgraded the
> kernel to 3.1.4-1 to try to get wifi working (which it did seem to), it
> turned the display off as soon as the kernel did a mode switch on boot.

Do you have the dmesg from that kernel?

Thanks,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111204133841.gh3...@radis.cristau.org



Bug#650960: task-desktop: Please Recommends kerneloops-applet instead of kerneloops package

2011-12-04 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Package: task-desktop
Version: 3.07
Severity: minor

Hi,

kerneloops package has been split into a kerneloops-applet and a
kerneloops-daemon package, kerneloops package is now a transitional
package.

task-desktop should now Recommends kerneloops-applet instead.

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111204164140.78f7b...@fornost.bigon.be



Bug#650819: grub-installer: The contents of grub.cfg depend on the kernel installed

2011-12-04 Thread Brian Potkin
reassign 650819 os-prober 1.49
thanks


On Sat 03 Dec 2011 at 14:08:21 +, Brian Potkin wrote:

> In short: the 30_os-prober section of grub.cfg is empty when the kernel
> installed is linux-image-686-pae but correctly written when
> linux-image-486 is used.

It becomes interesting if /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests from the
1,42 version of os-prober replaces the corresponding file on /target.
With linux-image-686-pae the 30_os-prober section of grub.cfg still does
not have any entries for a Linux OS but a Windows Vista OS is detected
and recorded,

Then, on replacing 50mounted-tests in /target/usr/lib/linux-boot-probes/
with the corresponding one from os-prober 1.42, the expected grub.cfg is
generated.

The methodology may not be the best but it seems sufficient to indicate
the bug should be reassigned.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111204162435.GL3655@desktop



Bug#650239: Hello?

2011-12-04 Thread Pa Blum
Are you guys going to help me or ain't you?

For some reason during installation the "configure the package manager" is
just skipped, so Synaptic can't work, Chrome can't install, and updates are
either not found or disastrous.  The file libcard3. (without a hyphenated
addition to the filename) is not present, among others.  How do I initiate
configuring the package manager?

I repeat: Are you guys going to help me or ain't you?

PaB


Bug#650979: debian-installer: syslinux boot menu falls off the bottom of the screen

2011-12-04 Thread Flavio Stanchina
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+squeeze3+b1
Severity: normal

The syslinux menu on squeeze installation media is configured in such a way
that some of the menu entries, the "press TAB to edit a menu entry" message
and the help messages fall off the bottom of the screen. I tested with
netinst CDs and hd-media boot images, but I believe all installation media
are configured in the same way.

The configuration in stdmenu.cfg is this (comment included):

menu vshift 17
menu rows 10
menu helpmsgrow 15
# The command line must be at least one line from the bottom.
menu cmdlinerow 16
menu timeoutrow 16
menu tabmsgrow 18

There are 28 lines in VESA mode, according to the syslinux docs. With vshift
set to 17 only 12 lines are available for the menu: the title and the hidden
border use 4 lines so there are only 8 lines left for the menu entries. I'm
attaching a screenshot from the amd64+i386 multiarch netinst CD's advanced
menu (which is 13 lines long) where this problem is clearly visible: no item
is selected because the selection went off the screen.

Also, the "scrollbar" is not visible if the menu exceeds the configured
number of lines, so the user has no clue that more entries are available.
This is probably due to the choice of colors and the black background.

A related, minor problem is that the display becomes corrupted if you edit a
command line that is longer than one screen line: try for example to edit
the "Graphical install" item on the multiarch netinst CD. This is because
syslinux is smart enough to pull the command line within the visible screen,
but then gets confused and scrolls things around wildly.

I tried changing the configuration on a hd-media boot image like this:

menu vshift 16
menu rows 7
menu helpmsgrow 12
menu cmdlinerow 12
menu tabmsgrow 13

It may need more tweaking, but at least all the menu entries and messages
are within the screen whle still not covering the logo. Only a few menus
have more than 7 entries.

If further space is wanted, I'd suggest moving the logo up, there's plenty
of black pixels at the top of the image. IMHO, the old boot screen was
neater and looked defintely less "toyish", by the way.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable'),
(400, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111204190455.25708.56766.report...@forza.casa



Bug#650979: broken boot menu

2011-12-04 Thread Flavio Stanchina
Screenshot from the amd64+i386 multiarch netinst CD's advanced menu (which 
is 13 lines long) where no item is selected because the selection went off 
the screen.


--
Ciao, Flavio

Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
<>

Processed: Bug#650819: grub-installer: The contents of grub.cfg depend on the kernel installed

2011-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 650819 os-prober 1.49
Bug #650819 [grub-installer] grub-installer: The contents of grub.cfg depend on 
the kernel installed
Bug reassigned from package 'grub-installer' to 'os-prober'.
Bug #650819 [os-prober] grub-installer: The contents of grub.cfg depend on the 
kernel installed
Bug Marked as found in versions os-prober/1.49.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
650819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132302663325361.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#650859: typical weekend after black friday install, 2011 edition

2011-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
WRT to grub's menu not having windows in it, I found this in the syslog:

Dec  3 13:18:11 kernel: [ 1108.179415] NTFS-fs warning (device sda2): 
load_system_files(): Volume is dirty.  Will not be able to remount read-write.  
Run chkdsk and mount in Windows.
Dec  3 13:18:11 50mounted-tests: debug: mounted as ntfs filesystem
Dec  3 13:18:11 50mounted-tests: debug: running subtest 
/usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/10freedos
Dec  3 13:18:11 10freedos: debug: /dev/sda2 is not a FAT partition: exiting
Dec  3 13:18:11 50mounted-tests: debug: running subtest 
/usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/10qnx
Dec  3 13:18:12 10qnx: debug: /dev/sda2 is not a QNX4 partition: exiting
Dec  3 13:18:12 50mounted-tests: debug: running subtest 
/usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/20macosx
Dec  3 13:18:12 macosx-prober: debug: /dev/sda2 is not an HFS+ partition: 
exiting
Dec  3 13:18:12 50mounted-tests: debug: running subtest 
/usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/20microsoft
Dec  3 13:18:12 20microsoft: debug: /dev/sda2 is a NTFS partition
Dec  3 13:18:12 20microsoft: result: /dev/sda2:Windows Vista 
(loader):Windows1:chain

And it also finds one of the recovery partitions as a windows partition:

Dec  3 13:18:12 20microsoft: debug: /dev/sda3 is a NTFS partition
Dec  3 13:18:13 20microsoft: result: /dev/sda3:Windows Vista 
(loader):Windows2:chain

So I cannot see from the syslog why the grub menu did not have these in
it. os-prober was also installed in /target , perhaps that os-prober
somehow failed to find OS's the d-i os-prober found?

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#650992: installation-reports: buffalo linkstation pro duo aka "LS-WTGL/R1 (3)" or lsproduo needs custom kernel

2011-12-04 Thread Philippe Coval
Package: installation-reports

Severity: normal


hi,

Regular install went almost fine, but target cant be reachable once rebooted
so i had to install a custom kernel before rebooting...

More details on process at :

http://rzr.online.fr/q/armv5

Boot method: tftp
Image version: 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/orion5x/network-console/buffalo/lspro/#20111204
Date: 20111204

Machine: buffalo linkstation pro duo v2  aka "LS-WTGL/R1 (3)"
Partitions: 

root@debian:/# parted /dev/sdb -s unit b print 
Model: ATA SAMSUNG HD103UJ (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 1000204886016B
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start  End Size   Type  File system 
Flags
 1  1048576B   1999634431B 1998585856Bprimary   ext3
 2  1999634432B65999470591B63999836160B   primary   ext4
 3  66000518144B   965999591423B   89073280B  extended
 5  66000519168B   565999304703B   48785536B  logical   ext4
raid
 6  566000353280B  965999591423B   39238144B  logical   ext4
raid
 4  999204847616B  1000204140543B  999292928B primary   linux-swap(v1)

(same for sdb)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

“Configure MD devices” seems to be stuck on :

12680 root  1724 Sudpkg --configure --force-configure mdcfg
12681 root  1936 R{mdcfg.postinst} /bin/sh 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mdcfg.postinst configure
kill -s INT ...


Also I noticed that previously :

Nov 26 20:29:40 finish-install: info: Running 
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/21micro-evtd
Nov 26 20:29:40 finish-install: /usr/sbin/micro-evtd.command: 
Nov 26 20:29:40 finish-install: line 10: 
Nov 26 20:29:40 finish-install: syntax error: bad function name
Nov 26 20:29:40 finish-install: 
Nov 26 20:29:40 finish-install: info: Running 
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/21qcontrol

Before "Finishing the installation" I had to open a shell and install a 
prebuild kernel as
shared at : http:/rzr.online.fr/q/armv5

I'll attach a patch for lsproduo support and will try to push it upstream too 
(linux)

Note, I did not touch the bootloader,
I did before to change netconsole but it should be safe to keep it unmodified

-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20111204-06:28"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=network-console

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux debian 3.1.0-1-orion5x #1 Wed Nov 30 19:48:25 UTC 2011 armv5tel 
GNU/Linux
usb-list: 
usb-list: Bus 01 Device 01: Marvell Orion EHCI [1d6b:0002]
usb-list:Level 00 Parent 00 Port 00  Class 09(hub  ) Subclass 00 Protocol 01
usb-list:Manufacturer: Linux 3.1.0-1-orion5x ehci_hcd
usb-list:Interface 00: Class 09(hub  ) Subclass 00 Protocol 00 Driver hub
usb-list: 
usb-list: Bus 02 Device 01: Marvell Orion EHCI [1d6b:0002]
usb-list:Level 00 Parent 00 Port 00  Class 09(hub  ) Subclass 00 Protocol 01
usb-list:Manufacturer: Linux 3.1.0-1-orion5x ehci_hcd
usb-list:Interface 00: Class 09(hub  ) Subclass 00 Protocol 00 Driver hub
lsmod: Module  Size  Used by
lsmod: nfsd  240976  13 
lsmod: nfs   333498  0 
lsmod: lockd  65485  2 nfsd,nfs
lsmod: fscache33171  1 nfs
lsmod: auth_rpcgss32713  2 nfsd,nfs
lsmod: nfs_acl 2189  2 nfsd,nfs
lsmod: sunrpc175795  15 nfsd,nfs,lockd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl
lsmod: dm_mod 59729  0 
lsmod: raid1  23334  1 
lsmod: raid0   7248  1 
lsmod: md_mod 93152  2 raid1,raid0
lsmod: jfs   148806  0 
lsmod: ext4  322727  1 
lsmod: jbd2   56341  1 ext4
lsmod: crc16   1097  1 ext4
lsmod: ext3  161276  0 
lsmod: jbd48601  1 ext3
lsmod: btrfs 606088  0 
lsmod: zlib_deflate   19413  1 btrfs
lsmod: lzo_compress1696  1 b

Bug#650819: grub-installer: The contents of grub.cfg depend on the kernel installed

2011-12-04 Thread Brian Potkin
On Sun 04 Dec 2011 at 16:24:35 +, Brian Potkin wrote:

> reassign 650819 os-prober 1.49
> thanks

>From the changelog in the 1.49 package:

   * Attempt to load the fuse module, to improve the chances of grub-mount
working.

This line is in syslog-486 only:

   Dec  3 12:20:43 kernel: [  967.581149] fuse init (API version 7.17)

Another install was done with a 686-pae image. 'lsmod | grep fuse' was
checked at frequent intervals while os-prober was in operation. It's
output was empty.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111204234000.GN3655@desktop



nic-modules vs nic-extra-modules

2011-12-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
The 'nic-modules' packages are described as containing 'Common NIC
drivers'.  However, I would estimate only two of those drivers are
commonly used (tg3 and xen-netfront).

The current module selection might make sense if the real purpose of the
split is to support old systems that are short of memory.  If that's the
intent I would just like to change the description.

Otherwise, I would guess that the real commonly-used modules (other than
wireless) are:

Atheros:  atl1c, atl1e, atl2 [1]
Broadcom: bnx2, tg3, broadcom[2]
Intel:e1000, e1000e, igb
Nvidia:   forcedeth
Realtek:  r8169
paravirt: virtio_net[3], vmxnet3, xen-netfront
library:  dca, libphy, mii

[1] I'm not sure about which of these are most common
[2] PHY driver required by tg3 to support some boards
[3] This is included for completeness but is currently in the
'virtio-modules' package which seems reasonable to me

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part