Bug#528847: d-i partitioner fails on Sun disklabel
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: mirror/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-sparc/current/images/mini.iso Date: 2009/5/16 1:00AM GMT-5 Machine: Sun Ultra 1 Processor: UltraSparc 200MHz Memory: 512mb Partitions: Initially blank, FUBAR, or otherwise unknown. Final partitioning scheme: zeromus:~# df -Tl FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda4 ext3 1851432342848 1414536 20% / tmpfstmpfs 255256 0255256 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 10240 160 10080 2% /dev tmpfstmpfs 255256 0255256 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 ext2 91159 15407 70888 18% /boot /dev/sdb1 ext3 2045912237028 1704956 13% /var Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): zeromus:~# lspci -knn zeromus:~# (this would make sense, because it's not a pci system) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [E] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: Booted fine, continued through the entire install process 100% as normal until the partitioner. Chose manual partitioning from the menu. Walked through the partitioning process as normal, and quickly discovered that it wasn't doing as it was told. /dev/sda (2.1GB disk)- Created 100mb /boot ext2 partition Created 100mb swap partition Attempted to create remaining 1.9GB partition - ended up with ~700KB. Similar story for /dev/sdb (same size). Did a little poking around with the partition tools in the shell during the standard install. Discovered that the disklabel was initially written to the disk with the correct geometry, but after the creation of the first partition on the disk, the disklabel now indicates a much smaller disk with significantly different geometry. Did not attempt to write to disk - it would have been pointless anyway because the effective usable size of the disk was ~200MB. Had to partition the disks manually from expert mode's shell using parted directly. After rewriting the disklabel, I was able to partition the drive properly. Rebooted out of expert mode (No real reason), reloaded in standard mode, ran through again, only using the partitioning menu to assign the mountpoints and filesystems. Everything worked as expected from that point forward. This system will be getting new drives in the next week or so, at which point I'll be able to use it to reproduce and further debug this problem if needed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: code swarm video
On Friday 15 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > I'd provide a video myself, but have problems generating one with > sufficient quality (mencode output sucks and ffmpeg segfaults on me). Managed it after all with ffmpeg after creating a chroot with d-multimedia packages (installing them on my stable system broke AVI playback in vlc). I'm currently uploading my variant in two versions: one of 4:33 minutes and that's 1/3 slower at 6:50. They are identical except for the speed (size is the same: 179MB). I personally prefer the second one. After the upload is complete, they should be available as: - http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/d-i_swarm_4m.avi - http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/d-i_swarm_6m.avi It's not as spectacular as Joey's version, but shows much more detail. For some reason they display a lot brighter on the LVD screen of my laptop than on the external CRT monitor. I'll leave them up for a month or so. Enjoy, FJP signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#528912: busybox: segfaults in ping6
Package: busybox Version: 1:1.10.2-2 Severity: important busybox segfaults in ping6 on armel: /etc # ping6 2a01:1:2:8::1 PING 2a01:1:2:87::1 (2a01:1:2:8::1): 56 data bytes Segmentation fault /etc # /bin/ping6 2a01:1:2:8::1 PING 2a01:1:2:87::1(2a01:1:2:8::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 2a01:1:2:8::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=12.2 ms 64 bytes from 2a01:1:2:8::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=12.6 ms ^C --- 2a01:1:2:8::1 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1008ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.274/12.445/12.616/0.171 ms /etc # Please support IPv6 and fix this bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-ixp4xx Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages busybox depends on: ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries busybox recommends no packages. busybox suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#528914: Package: installation-reports (rootfs full)
Package: installation-reports Boot method: DVD Image version: Lenny download.iso Date: 23.Feb.2009 Time:17:22:17 CET Machine: Processor:Dual PIII 1000 Memory:1 GB Partitions: Dateisystem Größe Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/ida/c0d0p1 259M 139M 107M 57% / tmpfs 443M 12K 443M 1% /lib/init/rw udev 10M 88K 10M 1% /dev tmpfs 443M 0 443M 0% /dev/shm /dev/ida/c0d0p974G 463M 69G 1% /home /dev/ida/c0d0p8 373M 11M 343M 3% /tmp /dev/ida/c0d0p5 4,6G 2,7G 1,7G 62% /usr /dev/ida/c0d0p6 2,8G 502M 2,2G 19% /var Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): lenny:/# lspci -knn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Broadcom CNB20LE Host Bridge [1166:0009] (rev 05) Kernel modules: sworks-agp 00:00.1 Host bridge [0600]: Broadcom CNB20LE Host Bridge [1166:0009] (rev 05) Kernel modules: sworks-agp 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21152 [1011:0024] (rev 03) Kernel modules: shpchp 00:02.0 PCI bridge [0604]: IBM PCI to PCI Bridge (IBM27-82351) [1014:0022] (rev 07) Kernel modules: shpchp 00:03.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] [10b7:9055] (rev 30) Kernel driver in use: 3c59x Kernel modules: 3c59x 00:04.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5212/AR5213 Multiprotocol MAC/baseband processor [168c:0013] (rev 01) Kernel driver in use: ath5k_pci Kernel modules: ath5k 00:0f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Broadcom OSB4 South Bridge [1166:0200] (rev 51) Kernel driver in use: piix4_smbus Kernel modules: i2c-piix4 00:0f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Broadcom OSB4 IDE Controller [1166:0211] Kernel driver in use: Serverworks_IDE Kernel modules: serverworks 01:04.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53C896/897 [1000:000b] (rev 07) Kernel driver in use: sym53c8xx Kernel modules: sym53c8xx 01:04.1 SCSI storage controller [0100]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53C896/897 [1000:000b] (rev 07) Kernel driver in use: sym53c8xx Kernel modules: sym53c8xx 01:05.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro 100 [8086:1229] (rev 08) Kernel driver in use: e100 Kernel modules: e100, eepro100 01:06.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC 215IIC [Mach64 GT IIC] [1002:4756] (rev 7a) 01:07.0 System peripheral [0880]: Compaq Computer Corporation Advanced System Management Controller [0e11:a0f0] 02:00.0 Mass storage controller [0180]: Compaq Computer Corporation Smart-2/P RAID Controller [0e11:ae10] (rev 03) Kernel driver in use: cpqarray Kernel modules: cpqarray Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [OK] Detect network card:[OK] Configure network: [OK] Detect CD: [OK] Load installer modules: [OK] Detect hard drives: [OK] Partition hard drives: [OK]Auto create ! Install base system:[OK] Clock/timezone setup: [OK] User/password setup:[OK] Install tasks: [OK] Install boot loader:[OK] Overall install:[OK] Comments/Problems: (rootfs full) Look at the Partition table above.(Auto) during install. 3 Days ago the root part on my /dev/ida/c0d0p1 259M 249M 10M 98% / running out of space in case of some automated security and kernel updates. I got errors with aptitude and apt get-install the packages are downloaded, extracted well, but can`t install! (running out of disk space) I`m unable to install any *.pkg (I deleted the old kernel version directories manually, also checked /var/log and /temp) Now everithing is o.k. ! My hint: Give more space in part /root during the automated installation. kindly regards debian_lenny_user -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#528914: marked as done (Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root partition)
Your message dated Sat, 16 May 2009 14:48:53 +0200 with message-id <20090516124853.gl4...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> and subject line Re: Bug#528914: Package: installation-reports (rootfs full) has caused the Debian Bug report #528914, regarding Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root partition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 528914: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528914 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: DVD Image version: Lenny download.iso Date: 23.Feb.2009 Time:17:22:17 CET Machine: Processor:Dual PIII 1000 Memory:1 GB Partitions: Dateisystem Größe Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/ida/c0d0p1 259M 139M 107M 57% / tmpfs 443M 12K 443M 1% /lib/init/rw udev 10M 88K 10M 1% /dev tmpfs 443M 0 443M 0% /dev/shm /dev/ida/c0d0p974G 463M 69G 1% /home /dev/ida/c0d0p8 373M 11M 343M 3% /tmp /dev/ida/c0d0p5 4,6G 2,7G 1,7G 62% /usr /dev/ida/c0d0p6 2,8G 502M 2,2G 19% /var Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): lenny:/# lspci -knn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Broadcom CNB20LE Host Bridge [1166:0009] (rev 05) Kernel modules: sworks-agp 00:00.1 Host bridge [0600]: Broadcom CNB20LE Host Bridge [1166:0009] (rev 05) Kernel modules: sworks-agp 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21152 [1011:0024] (rev 03) Kernel modules: shpchp 00:02.0 PCI bridge [0604]: IBM PCI to PCI Bridge (IBM27-82351) [1014:0022] (rev 07) Kernel modules: shpchp 00:03.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] [10b7:9055] (rev 30) Kernel driver in use: 3c59x Kernel modules: 3c59x 00:04.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5212/AR5213 Multiprotocol MAC/baseband processor [168c:0013] (rev 01) Kernel driver in use: ath5k_pci Kernel modules: ath5k 00:0f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Broadcom OSB4 South Bridge [1166:0200] (rev 51) Kernel driver in use: piix4_smbus Kernel modules: i2c-piix4 00:0f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Broadcom OSB4 IDE Controller [1166:0211] Kernel driver in use: Serverworks_IDE Kernel modules: serverworks 01:04.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53C896/897 [1000:000b] (rev 07) Kernel driver in use: sym53c8xx Kernel modules: sym53c8xx 01:04.1 SCSI storage controller [0100]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53C896/897 [1000:000b] (rev 07) Kernel driver in use: sym53c8xx Kernel modules: sym53c8xx 01:05.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro 100 [8086:1229] (rev 08) Kernel driver in use: e100 Kernel modules: e100, eepro100 01:06.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC 215IIC [Mach64 GT IIC] [1002:4756] (rev 7a) 01:07.0 System peripheral [0880]: Compaq Computer Corporation Advanced System Management Controller [0e11:a0f0] 02:00.0 Mass storage controller [0180]: Compaq Computer Corporation Smart-2/P RAID Controller [0e11:ae10] (rev 03) Kernel driver in use: cpqarray Kernel modules: cpqarray Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [OK] Detect network card:[OK] Configure network: [OK] Detect CD: [OK] Load installer modules: [OK] Detect hard drives: [OK] Partition hard drives: [OK]Auto create ! Install base system:[OK] Clock/timezone setup: [OK] User/password setup:[OK] Install tasks: [OK] Install boot loader:[OK] Overall install:[OK] Comments/Problems: (rootfs full) Look at the Partition table above.(Auto) during install. 3 Days ago the root part on my /dev/ida/c0d0p1 259M 249M 10M 98% / running out of space in case of some automated security and kernel updates. I got errors with aptitude and apt get-install the packages are downloaded, extracted well, but can`t install! (running out of disk space) I`m unable to install any *.pkg (I deleted the old kernel version directories manually, also checked /var/log and /temp) Now everithing is o.k. ! My hint: Give more space in part /root during the automated installation. kindly regards debian_lenny_user --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- reassign 528914 partman-auto retitle 528914 Shoul
Processed: Re: Bug#528914: Package: installation-reports (rootfs full)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 528914 partman-auto Bug#528914: Package: installation-reports (rootfs full) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-auto'. > retitle 528914 Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root > partition Bug#528914: Package: installation-reports (rootfs full) Changed Bug title to `Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root partition' from `Package: installation-reports (rootfs full)'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#528914: marked as done (Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root partition)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 528914 Bug#528914: Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root partition Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#528914: marked as done (Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root partition)
reopen 528914 thanks Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org): > > Your message dated Sat, 16 May 2009 14:48:53 +0200 > with message-id <20090516124853.gl4...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> > and subject line Re: Bug#528914: Package: installation-reports (rootfs full) > has caused the Debian Bug report #528914, > regarding Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root > partition > to be marked as done. Arg. After deeper thinking, I didn't want to close the bugbut forgot to remove the -done" part. Reopening. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#528224: fixed
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: etch-support | 0.04 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 528...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/528224 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: reassign 528929 to debian-installer
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 528929 debian-installer Bug#528929: debian-installer fails to install testing "squeeze" because libresolv-2.9.so segfaults Bug reassigned from package `libc6-udeb' to `debian-installer'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: forcibly merging 517231 528929
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 517231 528929 Bug#517231: debian-installer should unpack all glibc udebs at once Bug#528929: debian-installer fails to install testing "squeeze" because libresolv-2.9.so segfaults Bug#520442: amd64 netinst netcfg segfault daily build 03/19/2009 Bug#520711: installation-reports: The squeeze netinst doesn't find archive Forcibly Merged 517231 520442 520711 528929. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reassign 528929 to debian-installer
reassign 528929 debian-installer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20_multi.changes
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20_multi.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org along with the files: linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.tar.gz speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.dsc Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20_amd64.changes
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org along with the files: linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.dsc linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.tar.gz loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20_amd64.changes
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.dsc linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.tar.gz loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20_multi.changes
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.tar.gz speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.dsc Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20_multi.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.dsc linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.tar.gz loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb Override entries for your package: linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.dsc - optional debian-installer loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb - extra debian-installer loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb - extra debian-installer speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb - extra debian-installer speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb - extra debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20_amd64.changes is NEW
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.dsc linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.tar.gz (new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb extra debian-installer loop-AES crypto modules This package contains loop-AES crypto modules. (new) speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb extra debian-installer speakup modules This package contains speakup modules. Changes: linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6 (1.20) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to 2.6.29-2 kernel packages. * Built against version 2.6.29-4 of linux-modules-extra-2.6. Override entries for your package: linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.dsc - source debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20_multi.changes is NEW
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.dsc linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.tar.gz (new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb extra debian-installer loop-AES crypto modules This package contains loop-AES crypto modules. (new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb extra debian-installer loop-AES crypto modules This package contains loop-AES crypto modules. (new) speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.20_i386.udeb extra debian-installer speakup modules This package contains speakup modules. (new) speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.20_i386.udeb extra debian-installer speakup modules This package contains speakup modules. Changes: linux-modules-di-i386-2.6 (1.20) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to 2.6.29-2 kernel packages. * Built against version 2.6.29-4 of linux-modules-extra-2.6. Override entries for your package: linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.20.dsc - source debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.dsc linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.tar.gz loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb Override entries for your package: linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.20.dsc - optional debian-installer loop-aes-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb - extra debian-installer speakup-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.20_amd64.udeb - extra debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Request for help - cleaning spam from the debian-boot mailing list archive
On Sunday 03 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > I'm looking forward to a cleaner archive! If we share the workload a > bit, that should be possible. First of all: many thanks for the great response to this RFH! Progress on the review of the archive has been huge. Since the start over 11,000 nominations as spam have been submitted and about 3400 reviews have been done. This has already resulted in 676 spams being removed from the archive and for this week another 650 posts are waiting for review. We now have a solid team working on this and if we keep this up it looks that in 4 or 5 weeks we can have d-boot virtually clean of spam for 2006 and later. Current status can be seen on: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean Additional help to scan the archive and nominate posts is always welcome. Cheers, FJP signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#528993: Package: Installation Report
Package: installation-reports Boot method: Debian 501-i386-CD-1.iso. One CD, rest from internet Image version: first one on your list :-) Date: May 15, 2009 about 7 AM Eastern US Machine: Intel D845GEBV2 board with NVIDIA dual head video (AGP) Processor: Pentium IV 1.6 Memory: 1.5 GB Partitions: p...@desk:~$ df -T FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 ext3 6728280 4114764 2271736 65% / tmpfstmpfs 52 052 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 1024084 10156 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 52 052 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda6 ext348813188214916 46118644 1% /home p...@desk:~$ Output of p...@desk:~$ lspci -knn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE/PE DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface [8086:2560] (rev 03) Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel Kernel modules: intel-agp 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE/PE Host-to-AGP Bridge [8086:2561] (rev 03) Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:24c2] (rev 02) Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd Kernel modules: uhci-hcd 00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:24c4] (rev 02) Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd Kernel modules: uhci-hcd 00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:24c7] (rev 02) Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd Kernel modules: uhci-hcd 00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-M) USB2 EHCI Controller [8086:24cd] (rev 02) Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd Kernel modules: ehci-hcd 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge [8086:244e] (rev 82) Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL (ICH4/ICH4-L) LPC Interface Bridge [8086:24c0] (rev 02) Kernel modules: intel-rng, iTCO_wdt 00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801DB (ICH4) IDE Controller [8086:24cb] (rev 02) Kernel driver in use: PIIX_IDE Kernel modules: piix 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) SMBus Controller [8086:24c3] (rev 02) Kernel driver in use: i801_smbus Kernel modules: i2c-i801 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:24c5] (rev 02) Kernel driver in use: Intel ICH Kernel modules: snd-intel8x0 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation NV36 [GeForce FX 5700LE] [10de:0343] (rev a1) Kernel modules: nvidiafb 02:08.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82801DB PRO/100 VE (LOM) Ethernet Controller [8086:1039] (rev 82) Kernel driver in use: e100 Kernel modules: eepro100, e100 p...@desk:~$ Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [o] Detect network card:[0] Configure network: [E] sees dsl router, connects to web but not local net Detect CD: [o] Load installer modules: [o] Detect hard drives: [o] Partition hard drives: [o] Install base system:[o] Clock/timezone setup: [o] User/password setup:[E] really clunky Install tasks: [E] a little clunky Install boot loader:[E] can't boot to non-x Overall install:[E] Can't run YouTube, can't run second screen Comments/Problems: Very annoying that I can't get second screen up! I have been messing with it all yesterday and most of today. I downloaded the Nvidia driver and tried to install it. The first error was that it wanted a file called "system utility ld". I looked all over for that and couldn't find it. Sent a note to Nvidia, to which they did not reply. Of course, it was Friday. (Note to follow) Hi Nvidia! I downloaded what I supposed is your latest driver package for my Nvidia video card. I followed the instructions and the process started. However if stopped with the message that it was looking for the system utility "ld". I couldn't find "ld" on the machine and I don't know where to download it either. It isn't in synaptic. The machine is an Intel 810 series, the graffics board, of course, is Nvidia. The OS is Debian 5. desk:/home/pete# sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-71.86.09-pkg.run sh: NVIDIA-Linux-x86-71.86.09-pkg.run: No such file or directory desk:/home/pete# cd /home/pete/desktop/downloads/ bash: cd: /home/pete/desktop/downloads/: No such file or directory desk:/home/pete# cd /home/pete/desktop/downloads bash: cd: /home/pete/desktop/downloads: No such file or directory desk:/home/pete# cd /home/pete/Desktop/Downloads desk:/home/pete/Desktop/Downloads# sh
Bug#528914: Package: installation-reports (rootfs full)
Quoting Stephan Hilliger (step...@snackattack1.dyndns.org): > Hi Christian, > I had 3 SMP Kernel directories in the partition. > I deleteted 2 older kernel directories. > > The problem was, > I can`t install any other software-package with atp or aptitude. > The failed software was snort all_deb.pkg. > > It isn`t install in root. > > This was no problem of the kernel flavours, becourse the latest running > kernel installed is /2.6.26-2-686/kernel. Uh? That's becoming less and less clear. Your original bug report pointed to the root partition being filled at some moment and causing the package install failures. Then, you mention that cleaning out the root partition solved the problem. Packages often install stuff in /.at least files in /etc. Here you seem to mention snort which, for instance, copies a few files in /etc. So, well, what's currently said is "if the root partition is full, then packages that install files in the root partition fail to install". I would say this is expected..:-) So, the only "bug" one could see is the suggestion of making the root partition big enough to accomodate further changes by the local admin. This is actually what I thought you were suggesting: that the root partition should be at least able to accomodate with 2 kernel flavours as that often happens in a machine's life. That, I would agree with and this is why I finally didn't close the bug and reassigned it to partman-auto. However, you now mention that you actually had *three* living kernel flavours in a 260MB partition. I would say it is then expected that the partition fills in and makes packages intallation fail. So, pretty much normal behaviour here and not really something we can do much about: reserving more space for the root partition because sometimes users might want to install 3 kernel flavours at the same time would be kind of a waste. So, I would say it is then up to the local admin to not accept the proposed defaults for / when doing autopartitioning with a separated /usr, /var and /home if (s)he plans to install many packages that could fill up / So, I consider closing this bug again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Request for help - cleaning spam from the debian-boot mailing list archive
(cleaning spam in debian-boot: see http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean) Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl): > have been done. This has already resulted in 676 spams being removed from > the archive and for this week another 650 posts are waiting for review. Done this morning. No ham found, only Spam. I found out that I inadvertently left a few posts rated as "Unsure" which i apparently not really easy to come back on once you've clicked "Send and Continue". That happens because my fast "Click, Page Down" repetitions on the page sometimes fails (the click does not change the button status to "Spam". So, my reviews for this week probably have a few (less than 10) posts erroneously rated as "Unsure" while everything was spam, unboubtfully. > > We now have a solid team working on this and if we keep this up it looks > that in 4 or 5 weeks we can have d-boot virtually clean of spam for 2006 > and later. I wish we would have as many people working on patches to D-I..:-) A few enhancements I would propose to listmasters (or anyone behind the review tool): - have a display mode for the list archives where messages already "nominated" would be shown in a different way (maybe sorting messages by number of spam nominations?). That would help those people who review archives after 1 or 2 people already did it to spot possible spam more easily - allow reviewing more than 10 nominated posts at a time. This is probably what slows me down the most when reviewing. For the record, this morning, I spent about 40 minutes reviewing 550 nominated posts. - allow coming back on messages one once rated as "Unsure" Finally, once we've done 2006-2009, I think we should post something in http://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews. I don't know whether other people are doing such reviews but the method you (Frans) proposed and which we nos use could indeed bring emulation in other lists. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
REMINDER: D-I team meeting Monday May 18th 20:00UTC
Our bi-monthly team meeting will happen on May 18th at 20:00UTC. Please see http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings. Proposing topics to discuss is allowed and encouraged. Attenting the meeting is allowed and encouraged..:-) -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#517231: Processed: forcibly merging 517231 528929
reopen 517231 thanks Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org): > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > forcemerge 517231 528929 > Bug#517231: debian-installer should unpack all glibc udebs at once > Bug#528929: debian-installer fails to install testing "squeeze" because > libresolv-2.9.so segfaults > Bug#520442: amd64 netinst netcfg segfault daily build 03/19/2009 > Bug#520711: installation-reports: The squeeze netinst doesn't find archive > Forcibly Merged 517231 520442 520711 528929. Hmmm, all these are marked done because #520711 was closed on Apr 26th after some confirmation that nobody experienced it anymore. But, at that time, it wasn't clear that the bug was still here but only visible when installing squeeze with the lenny installer. That was apparently wrong: from #528929, the lenny installer still can't install squeeze. Re-opening. It seems that this issue should get some priority. As we go over the release goals list during meetings, I'll propose to include the fix for #517231 in release goals for D-I. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Processed: forcibly merging 517231 528929
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 517231 Bug#517231: debian-installer should unpack all glibc udebs at once Bug#520442: amd64 netinst netcfg segfault daily build 03/19/2009 Bug#520711: installation-reports: The squeeze netinst doesn't find archive Bug#528929: debian-installer fails to install testing "squeeze" because libresolv-2.9.so segfaults Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#528993: Package: Installation Report
Quoting Pete Theisen (petethei...@verizon.net): > Configure network: [E] sees dsl router, connects to web but not local net That's unclear. Did the install use the network and, if so, did it work. If it did, then the problem, if there's one, is elsewhere and not in the installer itself. > Detect CD: [o] > Load installer modules: [o] > Detect hard drives: [o] > Partition hard drives: [o] > Install base system:[o] > Clock/timezone setup: [o] > User/password setup:[E] really clunky ??? Did the installer set a password for root and did it create a normal user. If it did, then there is no problem in the installer itself. > Install tasks: [E] a little clunky ??? > Install boot loader:[E] can't boot to non-x > Overall install:[E] Can't run YouTube, can't run second screen .../... Advanced use of nVidia cards is much out of the scope of the installer and more something that has to do with X packages. Please note that nVidia is (IIRC, I'm not that much in that hardware business) not known for its friendlyness to provide open source drivers. For advanced features, you might then need to get their non free drivers. Most problems you describe do not pertain to the installer itself, apparently, but more seem to be installation tuning, after the install. In such cases, we often have no other option than closing the bug report, except when there is a clear package which we can reassign the bug to. But, for this, problems have to be made clear before... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
