Bug#254167: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#254027: installation-reports TC1 on Acer TravelMate 800)

[Steve Langasek]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 06:37:39AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:

> My current understanding is:
> 
> -sid_d-i is built daily from the d-i packages uploaded to
> unstable. Non d-i packages are also the unstable versions
> -sarge_d-i is built daily (?) from the packages in testing (sarge)
> 
> -dailiesi'm not really sure of the differences..:-)

"daily" is a symlink to sarge_d-i.

Cheers,

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#250530: nl_NL install: still some problems with accented characters

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone  250530 -1
Bug#250530: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Bug 250530 cloned as bug 254505.

> reassign -1 iso-codes
Bug#254505: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Bug reassigned from package `countrychooser' to `iso-codes'.

> retitle -1 Reunion has wrong encoding in dutch translation
Bug#254505: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Changed Bug title.

> reassign 250530 countrychooser
Bug#250530: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Bug reassigned from package `countrychooser' to `countrychooser'.

> retitle 250530 Wrong encoding for dutch translation
Bug#250530: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Changed Bug title.

> tags -1 pending
Bug#254505: Reunion has wrong encoding in dutch translation
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: pending

> tags 250530 pending
Bug#250530: Wrong encoding for dutch translation
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#250530: nl_NL install: still some problems with accented characters

[Christian Perrier]

clone  250530 -1
reassign -1 iso-codes
retitle -1 Reunion has wrong encoding in dutch translation
reassign 250530 countrychooser
retitle 250530 Wrong encoding for dutch translation
tags -1 pending
tags 250530 pending
thanks

Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> tags 250530 + l10n
> thanks
> 
> I think the basic problem has been fixed now, but I still see some encoding 
> problems in the full country list in countrychooser (after choosing 'other'):
> - most continents  and countries are shown correctly
> - two continents with accents are _not_ shown correctly:
>   - Caraïbisce eilanden (not OK; note also missing 'h' Caraïbische)
>   - Azià (not OK)
>   - Oceanië (is OK)
> - one country is incorrect:
>   - R�nion

As written in 250530 bug log, both countrychooser and iso-codes dutch
translations have encoding problems.

I have corrected these problems in both repositories. We thus need a
new upload for iso-codes and after it, a new countrychooser must be
built.

Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It looks like we have to throw out tc1 as not good enough for release.
> The release critical problems include:

It seems to me that a kind of "formal" meeting on IRC would help all
of us in organising our work.

We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just an idea "en l'air").

As Joey leaves on Thursday, I'd like to propose something before that
moment (which means tomorrow 6/16, Wednesday). If you all agree this
could be a Good Thing for sure.

The major problem is the time slot of course.

We have people on USA (UTC -0700 to -0400)
Europe (UTC +0200), Britain (UTC +0100) and Japan (UTC +0900), so this
is very tricky...:-) (do we have people in Australia/NZ?)

This basically gives us three time slots:

1) 16:00 UTC, which means from 09:00 to 12:00 in USA, 17:00 or 18:00 in
Europe and 01:00 the day after in Japan

2) 23:00 UTC, which means from 16:00 to 19:00 in USA, 00:00 or 01:00 in
Europe and 08:00 the day after in Japan

3) 06:00 UTC, which means from 23:00 to 02:00 in USA, 07:00 to 08:00 in
Europe and 15:00 in Japan

My own preference is for 1) though it's not the best hour for mer
personnally (I have to leave work earlier than usually)

What do you folks thinks about this?

If we drop support for Kenshi (who is the only one in Japan), we get
more possibilities by using something like 19:00 UTC (by far the most
convienient for me:-))).

We are maybe short of time. If so, I propose we schedule a meeting
when Joey will be back, next week.

Such meetings could be scheduled on a regular basis.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian Sarge on oldworld Powermac?

[Ralf Schlatterbeck]

On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:14:49PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Reset (zap) the PRAM.  Turn the power off, then turn it on with the 
> Command-Option-P-R keys (all of them) held down.  Hold the keys 
> down til it bongs a couple of times, then release and it should 
> boot normally from floppy.
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Sunday, June 13, 2004, at 05:51 AM, matt-land.com wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> >
> > It seems I have one of those non-bootable machines you speak of.  After
> > the installer (v3.0) finished, the machine never booted.  Booting 
> > from a
> > floppy nolonger works either.  Any way I can boot from a floppy?

Yes, I had the same issue with one of the machines which had some
environment variables changed in the open firmware. cmd-opt-P-R fixed it
(you will have to boot from floppy and re-run the quik setup).

Ralf
-- 
Ralf Schlatterbeck
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: +43/2243/26465/23


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Usablity: network configuration on machine without a network card(beta4 and tc1)

[Thomas Hood]

In http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/06/msg01180.html Baptiste
Carvello wrote:
> /etc/network/interfaces is empty

The same problem was reported in #243543 but was reported to have been
fixed already.  Please check there to see if you think that the
circumstances are the same.
--
Thomas Hood


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254555: installation-reports

[Michel van der Klei]

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 15-06-2004 02:30
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux sarge 2.4.26-1-386 
Date: 15-06-2004 03:00.00
Method: Network install from ftp.nl.debian.org 

Machine: Dell PowerEdge 1600SC IDE
Processor: Pentium Xeon 2,4 Ghz
Memory: 1024 Mb
Root Device: IDE Seagate 120 Gb
Sec. Hdd: IDE Seagate 120 Gb

Root Size/partition table:
sarge:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda

Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 1200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14589 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   1   4   32098+  de  Dell Utility
/dev/hda2   *   5  10   48195   83  Linux
/dev/hda3  11 132  979965   83  Linux
/dev/hda4 133   14589   116125852+   5  Extended
/dev/hda5 133 740 4883728+  83  Linux
/dev/hda6 7411348 4883728+  83  Linux
/dev/hda713491470  979933+  83  Linux
/dev/hda814712199 5855661   83  Linux
/dev/hda922002321  979933+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hda10   2322   1204778124063+  83  Linux
/dev/hda11  12048   13263 9767488+  83  Linux
/dev/hda12  13264   1458910651063+  83  Linux


Output of lspci:

sarge:~# lspci
:00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks GCNB-LE Host Bridge (rev 32)
:00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks GCNB-LE Host Bridge
:00:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 
02)
:00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 0d)
:00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
:00:0f.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93)
:00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93)
:00:0f.2 USB Controller: ServerWorks OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05)
:00:0f.3 ISA bridge: ServerWorks CSB5 LPC bridge
:00:10.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CIOB-X2 (rev 05)
:00:10.2 Host bridge: ServerWorks CIOB-X2 (rev 05)
:01:04.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X 
Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)

First install:

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

I had a little worries about the gigabit nic since i had trouble with it in the past. 
No troubles found, nice job dudes

Regards,

Michel van der Klei




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254555: marked as done (installation-reports)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:27:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254555: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 13:14:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 06:14:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mitchit.xs4all.nl (mitch-it.com) [80.126.80.171] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaDlQ-00029s-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:14:09 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mitch-it.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA20113662
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:12:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mitch-it.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (cypher [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 23684-07 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.0.0.1] (neo [10.0.0.1])
by mitch-it.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B761C1365A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: installation-reports
From: Michel van der Klei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Mitch IT
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:13:10 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Running on Debian GNU/Linux with Postfix 
& Clam AV)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 15-06-2004 02:30
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux sarge 2.4.26-1-386 
Date: 15-06-2004 03:00.00
Method: Network install from ftp.nl.debian.org 

Machine: Dell PowerEdge 1600SC IDE
Processor: Pentium Xeon 2,4 Ghz
Memory: 1024 Mb
Root Device: IDE Seagate 120 Gb
Sec. Hdd: IDE Seagate 120 Gb

Root Size/partition table:
sarge:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda

Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 1200 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14589 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   1   4   32098+  de  Dell Utility
/dev/hda2   *   5  10   48195   83  Linux
/dev/hda3  11 132  979965   83  Linux
/dev/hda4 133   14589   116125852+   5  Extended
/dev/hda5 133 740 4883728+  83  Linux
/dev/hda6 7411348 4883728+  83  Linux
/dev/hda713491470  979933+  83  Linux
/dev/hda814712199 5855661   83  Linux
/dev/hda922002321  979933+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hda10   2322   1204778124063+  83  Linux
/dev/hda11  12048   13263 9767488+  83  Linux
/dev/hda12  13264   1458910651063+  83  Linux


Output of lspci:

sarge:~# lspci
:00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks GCNB-LE Host Bridge (rev 32)
:00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks GCNB-LE Host Bridge
:00:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 
02)
:00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 0d)
:00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
:00:0f.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93)
:00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93)
:00:0f.2 USB Controller: ServerWorks OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05)
:00:0f.3 ISA bridge: ServerWorks CSB5 LPC bridge
:00:10.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CIOB-X2 (rev 05)
:00:10.2 Host bridge: ServerWorks CIOB-X2 (rev 05)
:01:04.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X 
Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)

First install:

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot load

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Kenshi Muto]

Hi,

At 15 Jun 04 07:31:49 GMT,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It seems to me that a kind of "formal" meeting on IRC would help all
> of us in organising our work.
> 
> We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just an idea "en l'air").
> 
> As Joey leaves on Thursday, I'd like to propose something before that
> moment (which means tomorrow 6/16, Wednesday). If you all agree this
> could be a Good Thing for sure.
> 
> The major problem is the time slot of course.
> 
> We have people on USA (UTC -0700 to -0400)
> Europe (UTC +0200), Britain (UTC +0100) and Japan (UTC +0900), so this
> is very tricky...:-) (do we have people in Australia/NZ?)
> 
> This basically gives us three time slots:
> 
> 1) 16:00 UTC, which means from 09:00 to 12:00 in USA, 17:00 or 18:00 in
> Europe and 01:00 the day after in Japan
> 
> 2) 23:00 UTC, which means from 16:00 to 19:00 in USA, 00:00 or 01:00 in
> Europe and 08:00 the day after in Japan
> 
> 3) 06:00 UTC, which means from 23:00 to 02:00 in USA, 07:00 to 08:00 in
> Europe and 15:00 in Japan
> 
> My own preference is for 1) though it's not the best hour for mer
> personnally (I have to leave work earlier than usually)

I like 1) or 2).

> If we drop support for Kenshi (who is the only one in Japan), we get
> more possibilities by using something like 19:00 UTC (by far the most
> convienient for me:-))).

AM 4:00... Oh NO, I'm not a morning person! :-)

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Big problem with 20040614 sid_d-i i386 netinst image

[Joey Hess]

Christian Perrier wrote:
> 20040614 sid_d-i i386 netinst
> 
> 1st stage is OK (choose french+Brazil)
> 
> After reboot, it seems that termwrap fails:
> 
> 
> /bin/sh: line1: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
> 
> And then init respawns base-config over and over

I broke this in my changes to mapdevfs, uploading a fix now.

It sounds like the new libd-i package resolver works for i386. That's a
nice change.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: r16834 - trunk/packages/libdebian-installer/src/system

[Joey Hess]

Bastian Blank wrote:
> Modified:
>trunk/packages/libdebian-installer/src/system/devfs.c
> Log:
> Joey Hess likes to cry about wasted space but do it also.

A better way to save space with libdi is to move functions like this one
that are only used by one program in all of d-i out of the library and
into the program. In the case of the devfs stuff, that's mapdevfs in the
di-utils-mapdevfs udeb. Then we wouldn't have a devfs mapper that is not
used until after partman runs (and after swap is enabled) bloating our
initrds and floppys.

This is why I'd like to ultimatly get rid of most of libd-i. We get
version skew, and wasted space too with the current system.

> Only use one enumeration.

Well, it's a recipe for a combinatiorial explosion, but I suppose you
won't run out of enums space.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Big problem with 20040614 sid_d-i i386 netinst image

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> > /bin/sh: line1: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
> > 
> > And then init respawns base-config over and over
> 
> I broke this in my changes to mapdevfs, uploading a fix now.

Which should make it in today's build, fine. Thus I'll be able to test
the 2nd stage things and locales stuff with today's build, then.

I made a promise to myself : test the sid_d-i and the sarge_d-i at
least once a dayBasic tests of course ("normal path" installs),
but at least this should reveal such horror stories..:-)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254167: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#254027: installation-reports TC1 on Acer TravelMate 800)

[Joey Hess]

Christian Perrier wrote:
> My current understanding is:
> 
> -sid_d-i is built daily from the d-i packages uploaded to
> unstable. Non d-i packages are also the unstable versions

No, udebs are from unstable, but debs are from testing.

> -sarge_d-i is built daily (?) from the packages in testing (sarge)
> 
> -dailiesi'm not really sure of the differences..:-)

http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/builds although I've just
committed a lot of changes to that page and the new one has not built
yet.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Joey Hess]

Christian Perrier wrote:
> It seems to me that a kind of "formal" meeting on IRC would help all
> of us in organising our work.
> 
> We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just an idea "en l'air").

I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
to discuss. This could be a good idea, at least it can't hurt to try it.

> As Joey leaves on Thursday, I'd like to propose something before that
> moment (which means tomorrow 6/16, Wednesday). If you all agree this
> could be a Good Thing for sure.

I was probably unclear, I leave Wednesday morning. I have an 11 hour
drive and I need to get to my campsite before dark.

> 1) 16:00 UTC, which means from 09:00 to 12:00 in USA, 17:00 or 18:00 in
> Europe and 01:00 the day after in Japan

I can probably make part of this timeslot, and no others. Please don't let
my absense stop you from doing anything though.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#254403: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:13:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line PCMCIA freezes install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2004 15:53:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 14 08:53:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zooty.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.16.231] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BZtm5-0003lb-00; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 08:53:30 -0700
Received: from marl.lancs.ac.uk ([148.88.1.10])
by zooty.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1BZtm4-0003an-Kf
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:53:28 +0100
Received: from fub02305.lancs.ac.uk ([148.88.129.71])
by marl.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1BZtm4-0002XM-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:53:28 +0100
Subject: Package: installation-reports
From: mp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:55:04 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports 
Debian-installer-version: <5 
June,http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
 >
uname -a: 
Date: <5/6 June, 2004>
Method: 

Machine: Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo A7620, Danish Keyboard
Processor: Athlon XP +2600
Memory: Desktop DDR RAM: 1 x Nanya 512Mb, 1 x Crucial 512Mb
Root Device: 
Root Size/partition table: arhh... a dual-boot with Fedora Core 2 and Win XP is on the 
machine
Output of lspci: 

The installation never starts. It hangs at 93% of "Detecting hardware to find CD-ROM 
drives" with the subtitle: "Starting PC Card Services".

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[0]
Configure network HW:   [0]
Config network: [0]
Detect CD:  [E]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:




---
Received: (at 254403-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 18:14:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 11:14:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaIRj-0001na-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:14:07 -0700
Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BaIRE-0007yt-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:13:36 +0200
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PCMCIA freezes install
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:13:35 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Closing this report as hw-detect/start_pcmcia=false fixed the freeze.

Please submit a new installation report if you found any other issues during 
your install.

Cheers,
FJP


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Usablity: network configuration on machine without a network card (beta4 and tc1)

[Joey Hess]

Baptiste Carvello wrote:
> tc1: A few changes, but only to make it worse: after choosing "none of 
> the above", I get a proposition to provide a driver floppy, and when I 
> anser "no", I get cycled back to the previous question. The only way to 
> get to the menu is pressing the ESC key.

Please file a bug against ethdetect about that. It should not loop back
after prompting for the floppy, and the red error message screen could
probably be removed now that we have a prompt for a floppy instead.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
> to discuss. This could be a good idea, at least it can't hurt to try it.

Basically, I think your "dropping tc1" mail could be a start. Just get
all the points one by one and assign ourselves tasks.

This is probably, imho, what's currently missing : have assigned tasks
and regular points for confirming what is advancing and what is
not.

Not easy to achieve as, by definition, we all do all this basiucally
on our free timebut, well, we can try..:-)

> 
> > As Joey leaves on Thursday, I'd like to propose something before that
> > moment (which means tomorrow 6/16, Wednesday). If you all agree this
> > could be a Good Thing for sure.
> 
> I was probably unclear, I leave Wednesday morning. I have an 11 hour
> drive and I need to get to my campsite before dark.


Hmmm, thus it will be hard to have something organised before you leave.

> 
> > 1) 16:00 UTC, which means from 09:00 to 12:00 in USA, 17:00 or 18:00 in
> > Europe and 01:00 the day after in Japan
> 
> I can probably make part of this timeslot, and no others. Please don't let
> my absense stop you from doing anything though.

Sure.but as "release manager appointed by all of us", you being
present is a must have

Let's see others reactions. It seems that the 16:00 UTC is the most
probable correct timeslot (though, well, not that easy for
mebecause this is usually my "travel back home" timeand I need
1h30 for going back home daily).

I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
possibility. #debian-boot channel, of course.



Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
(Joey already counted as not attending)

1) Christian Perrier / bubulle



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23

[Joey Hess]

Apal wrote:
> :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
> :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 01)
> :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 01)
> 
> :00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 01)
> :00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:2484 (rev 01)
> :00:1d.2 Class 0c03: 8086:2487 (rev 01)
> 
> I tried again, and it happen with the "normal" install as with the 
> "linux26" install. Do you need to know any other things to fix this ?
> Thanks.

Yes, there is one other peice of info we need. We need to know which usb
modules to load for these three PCI ids. If you can:

 - boot the installer into the normal (2.4) mode
 - switch to the shell console with alt-f2 and log in with Enter
 - modprobe usb-ohci ; modprobe usb-uhci ; modprobe ehci-hcd
 - grep hci /proc/bus/pci/devices | cut -f 2,18
 - send us the output of the above grep/cut command

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 254448, reassign 254448 to discover1-data ...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 254448 d-i
Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i

> reassign 254448 discover1-data
Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover1-data'.

> retitle 254448 missing three pci ids for intel 82801CA USB controller
Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254448: FWD: Re: Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23

[Joey Hess]

- Forwarded message from Apal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

From: Apal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:05:01 +0200
To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Joey Hess a écrit :

>Apal wrote:
> 
>
>>Comments/Problems: External USB CDROM Drives aren't detected, and on 
>>some machine, (e.g. IBM ultraportables notebooks, the X20/X30/X40 
>>families, and subnotebooks, like Sony Vaio C1) don't have built-in CDROM 
>>Drive. USB Floppy is the only way, when we can't have a docking station 
>>with internal drives, to install an OS.
>>Here the drive is bootable, but the Debian Installer can't detect it to 
>>finish install. Same problem on Woody CDs...
>>
>>I hope you will be able to add USB CDROM drives support on this 
>>installer, cause it look great, anyway
>>Thanks for your job !
>>   
>>
>
>The installer should support usb cdroms. It may not know to load the
>usb modules for your usb controller. If you can send us your lspci and
>lspci -n output for your machine, we can fix this.
>
> 
>
I don't know if you get my previous message, so i re-send it. (i had 
connexion problem while i sent it) Sorry if it's a "double" :
Here is the lspci output :

:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset Host Bridge (rev 02)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 02)
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 01)
:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 01)
:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 41)
:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801CAM ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 01)
:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801CAM IDE U100 (rev 01)
:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM SMBus Controller (rev 01)
:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 
Audio Controller (rev 01)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon 
Mobility M6 LY
:02:03.0 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev 80)
:02:03.1 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev 80)
:02:05.0 Communication controller: Lucent Microelectronics WinModem 
56k (rev 01)
:02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82801CAM (ICH3) PRO/100 VE 
(LOM) Ethernet Controller (rev 41)

And here the lspci -n :

:00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:3575 (rev 02)
:00:01.0 Class 0604: 8086:3576 (rev 02)
:00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 01)
:00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:2484 (rev 01)
:00:1d.2 Class 0c03: 8086:2487 (rev 01)
:00:1e.0 Class 0604: 8086:2448 (rev 41)
:00:1f.0 Class 0601: 8086:248c (rev 01)
:00:1f.1 Class 0101: 8086:248a (rev 01)
:00:1f.3 Class 0c05: 8086:2483 (rev 01)
:00:1f.5 Class 0401: 8086:2485 (rev 01)
:01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:4c59
:02:03.0 Class 0607: 1180:0476 (rev 80)
:02:03.1 Class 0607: 1180:0476 (rev 80)
:02:05.0 Class 0780: 11c1:0449 (rev 01)
:02:08.0 Class 0200: 8086:1031 (rev 41)

I tried again, and it happen with the "normal" install as with the 
"linux26" install. Do you need to know any other things to fix this ?
Thanks.

- End forwarded message -

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processing of libdebian-installer_0.29_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

libdebian-installer_0.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  libdebian-installer_0.29.dsc
  libdebian-installer_0.29.tar.gz
  libdebian-installer4_0.29_i386.deb
  libdebian-installer4-dev_0.29_i386.deb
  libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
  libdebian-installer-extra4_0.29_i386.deb
  libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.dsc
  libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.tar.gz
  libdebian-installer4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
  libdebian-installer4-dev_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
  libdebian-installer-extra4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
  libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
  libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libdebian-installer_0.29_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.29_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.29_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.29_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.29_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer4_0.29_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.29_i386.deb
libdebian-installer_0.29.dsc
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.29.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.29.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.29.tar.gz
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
  to 
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
  to 
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
  to 
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.dsc
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.tar.gz


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254452: Languages switches to english after rebooting during base-config

[Thorsten Schaefer]

> Hmm. I don't really see what's meant by "various daily builds of
> beta4". Beta4 is now over and not rebuilt.
> Still we have these imprecisions around all build versions.
>
Sorry for not being exact enough, i meant beta 4 of the debian
installer and various daily builds that came afterwards.
>
> Yesterday, I made very extensive tests of sid_d-i 20040612 with
> various combinations of languages.
>
To be hundred percent sure I just downloaded again a daily build of
the debian-installer for i386 here:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040614/.
This version has still the issue.

> What you described only happened to me with Japanese+Japan choice
and
> 2.6 kernel. The 2nd stage was in English. I think this is currently
a
> workaround for a kernel problem.
> However, this was never noticed for 2.4 installs. Tested with ja+JP,
> fr+FR on my system.
>
I use the standard kernel that is installed with the debian-installer
(sarge) and right now this is 2.4.26-1. I've tested the issue with
de_DE. The language in the 2nd stage is first German, if you reboot
(for troubleshooting for example) the language switches to English.
Also when the configuration is finished in German (without rebooting)
and base-config is run again later the dialogs are in English again.

Regards

Thorsten



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23

[Apal]

Joey Hess a écrit :

  Apal wrote:
  
  
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 01)
:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 01)

:00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 01)
:00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:2484 (rev 01)
:00:1d.2 Class 0c03: 8086:2487 (rev 01)

I tried again, and it happen with the "normal" install as with the 
"linux26" install. Do you need to know any other things to fix this ?
Thanks.

  
  
Yes, there is one other peice of info we need. We need to know which usb
modules to load for these three PCI ids. If you can:

 - boot the installer into the normal (2.4) mode
 - switch to the shell console with alt-f2 and log in with Enter
 - modprobe usb-ohci ; modprobe usb-uhci ; modprobe ehci-hcd
 - grep hci /proc/bus/pci/devices | cut -f 2,18
 - send us the output of the above grep/cut command

  

Ok, there is the result of the command :

80862482         usb-uhci
80862484         usb-uhci
80862487         usb-uhci

Only the modprobe usb-uhci detected a device. The others said No such
device.

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Gaudenz Steinlin]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 
> > I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
> > to discuss. This could be a good idea, at least it can't hurt to try it.
> 
> Basically, I think your "dropping tc1" mail could be a start. Just get
> all the points one by one and assign ourselves tasks.
> 
> This is probably, imho, what's currently missing : have assigned tasks
> and regular points for confirming what is advancing and what is
> not.
> 
> Not easy to achieve as, by definition, we all do all this basiucally
> on our free timebut, well, we can try..:-)

I think it is a good thing to have more or less regular meetings. I hope
it will be easier for myself to come back to d-i
developement. Currently I'm a bit lost in the huge mass of mails and
don't know where help is most needed.

> 
> I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
> possibility. #debian-boot channel, of course.

Sorry, I will be away this week-end. So I cannot attend this meeting.
> 
> 
> 
> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
> (Joey already counted as not attending)
> 
> 1) Christian Perrier / bubulle
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#248627: Debian Installer version 4 - Installation report

[Thorsten Schaefer]

 >> Oh? So you didn't have the DHCP problem when you used tc1?
> No, it worked just fine now.

Seems I said to early that it is working fine now. With the daily
build from June 14th that I downloaded and tested today, the issue is
there again (for the  REM56G-100). I checked syslog and the same
messages as reported earlier are in /etc/var/syslog ("no working
leases in persistant database")

Regards

Thorsten



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Giuseppe Sacco]

Il Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier ha scritto:
[...] 
> I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
> possibility. #debian-boot channel, of course.
> 
> 
> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
> (Joey already counted as not attending)
> 
> 1) Christian Perrier / bubulle
2) Giuseppe Sacco / eppesuig (I will have more time available from now on)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian Boot logo

[Joey Hess]

Alessandro Polverini wrote:
> reading the changelog of d-i I saw you switched back to the old logo
> because the current one confused some users (!?).

It's hard to belive, isn't it? It seems that more than one user saw the
white lines dividing the top and bottom of the logo, and the cut in half
"Debian", and saw not an artistic effect, but what seemed to them to be
screen corruption.

> I red a statement of the person counting the votes and if I remember
> well, the other our logo was the second one most voted.
> 
> It does not have the "problem" that someone can think that the screen is
> garbled, I ask you to consider it for the next daily build, to check
> what is the response of the users.
> 
> You can grab it at:
> http://nibbles.it/debian/
> 
> The logo I'm speaking about is the "First proposal".

I went back to the "klowner" logo in the spirit of just reverting to
something that was known to work and that didn't have any real problems.
Something I've also been known to do with various code in d-i from time
to time, and I know it can be frustrating. We'll use this logo for the
rc1 release, and will have another opportunity to reconsider after that.

I actually think that your third proposal is also pretty neat, though I
don't know where the syslinux text would fit with. I think one thing we
learned from the vote is that just looking at a logo in a web browser is
not a good way to judge whether it works as a boot logo. Also that we
have to consider usability issues when choosing a logo. That makes the
result of the vote less valid, and if we hold another vote of some kind
we'll have to change how it's done to adress this.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23

[Apal]

Hi again,
After Joey Hess ask me to load the usb-uhci module, i tried to detect 
the usb cdrom drive again, and it works !
Perhaps the installator should try to load these 3 modules before 
detecting cd :)

Thanks for your support !
I will send an installation reports again after this try. Bye !
(now installing Sarge on my laptop)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23

[Apal]

I tried again :
Only the normal install (kernel 2.4) is able to load the usb-uhci 
module, to detect my drive.
The linux26 install can't load this module. My drive is not recognized.
Is it possible to fix the linux26 install ?

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Colin Watson]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
> possibility. #debian-boot channel, of course.
> 
> 
> 
> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
> (Joey already counted as not attending)

I can't make that, I'm afraid. Of your other slots, 23:00 UTC on
Saturday is fine, and 16:00 UTC works practically every day apart from
this Wednesday and Saturday.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#253361: marked as done (netfcg display error using plip)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253361: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2004 21:57:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 08 14:57:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailfe04.swip.net [212.247.154.97] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BXobV-0007OS-00; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 14:57:57 -0700
X-T2-Posting-ID: bAoHk1swuPIxG5FRtV5oG08uPSbtyrVwhAVJmTM0hyU=
Received: from [213.102.230.185] (HELO imag.fr)
  by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b4a)
  with ESMTP id 60024917 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:57:54 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:57:59 +0200
From: sylvain ferriol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107 Debian/1.5-3
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netfcg display error using plip
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: netcfg
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

when i try to config static network using plip, i get the netcfg/error template 
message.
in console 4:
"""
INFO: executing: ip addr add 192.68.0.2/32 broadcast 0.0.0 dev plip0
ip:
RTNETLINK answers
: Network is unreachable
"""

ifconfig return:
plip0  
inet addr:192.68.0.2 P-t-P:192.68.0.2 Mask:255.255.255.255


but my gateway is 192.68.0.1

this is my config
ipaddress: 192.68.0.2
netmask: 255.255.255.255
gateway: 192.68.0.1
pointopoint: 192.68.0.1
nameservers: 212.151.136.246


sylvain




---
Received: (at 253361-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 22:08:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 15:08:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM6h-0003HP-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:08:39 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM0L-00027P-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#253361: fixed in netcfg 0.69
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 0.69

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.69.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netcfg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:34:25 -0700
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg-static netcfg-dhcp netcfg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.69
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#253099: marked as done (killall.sh: Can kill wrong PID)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253099: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2004 08:48:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 07 01:48:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BXFo2-Yh-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 01:48:34 -0700
Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=localhost)
by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1BXFo1-000PJk-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 08:48:33 +
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 5B8A110D6EE; Mon,  7 Jun 2004 10:48:32 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: killall.sh: Can kill wrong PID
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:48:32 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: netcfg
Version: 0.67
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

The killall.sh script uses the following code to find the PIDs of running
DHCP client daemons:

pids=$(ps ax | grep 'udhcpc\|dhclient\|pump' | sed 's/^[
]*\([0-9]*\).*/\1/')

However, (1) this picks up the PID of the grep process itself:

$ ps ax | grep 'udhcpc\|dhclient\|pump'
15769 pts/2S+ 0:00 grep udhcpc\|dhclient\|pump


(2) I don't see where udhcpc is started.  In dhcp.c only
dhclient3, dhclient and pump seem to be supported.

(3) ps has built in output formatting so sed isn't really needed.

Better would be:

for CLIENT in dhclient3 dhclient pump ; do
  pids=$(ps --no-headers -o pid -C $CLIENT)
  for pid in $pids; do
  ...
  done
done


Here's a patch:

--- /tmp/killall.sh_ORIG2004-06-07 10:24:26.0 +0200
+++ killall.sh  2004-06-07 10:26:34.0 +0200
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 #!/bin/sh
 # Killall for dhcp clients.
 
-pids=$(ps ax | grep 'udhcpc\|dhclient\|pump' | sed 's/^[ ]*\([0-9]*\).*/\1/')
-
-for pid in $pids; do
-  if kill -0 $pid 2>/dev/null; then
-kill -TERM $pid
-sleep 1
-# Still alive? Die!
+for CLIENT in dhclient3 dhclient pump ; do
+  for pid in $(ps --no-headers -o pid -C $CLIENT) ; do
 if kill -0 $pid 2>/dev/null; then
-  kill -KILL $pid
+  kill -TERM $pid
+  sleep 1
+  # Still alive? Die!
+  if kill -0 $pid 2>/dev/null; then
+kill -KILL $pid
+  fi
 fi
-  fi
+  done
 done


Another thing: One second isn't very long.  What happens if this code
kill -KILL's the DHCP client before it has finished deconfiguring the
interface?  Perhaps start-stop-daemon should be used here with a
longer timeout.

for CLIENT in /sbin/dhclient3 /sbin/dhclient /sbin/pump ; do
  [ -x $CLIENT ] && start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --exec $CLIENT 
--retry=TERM/10/KILL/2 > /dev/null
done

This has the additional advantage of only killing genuine processes,
not processes whose executable files happen to have the same names.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 253099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 22:08:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 15:08:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM6S-0003El-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:08:24 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM0L-00027N-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#253099: fixed in netcfg 0.69
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.deb

DHCP failure on test candidate 1

[Thom Nuzum]

Hi Folks,
I'm new to Debian.

Just tried the sarge netinst.iso and am unable to get DHCP working during
install. I skipped the network setup and installed the base system. I
suppose I can try to setup DHCP again. I know my Internet is correct as I
have had SuSE detect it and XP.
.
(my system note follows)
Running Athlon XP...120GBNVIDIA,,,Viewsonic VP171.
System is dualboot: installed debian over SuSE 9.1
I am using stable kernel as I had major problems with 2.6 and losing my XP
partition as well as all data
.

Thanks,
Thom Nuzum
Realtor Technology Trainer
Washington DC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248147: marked as done (debian-installer: netcfg/use_dhcp parameter can't be allowed on cdrom image)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248147: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 15:50:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 09 08:50:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] 
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BMqZk-Gc-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 08:50:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66829222F51
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 20761-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: from hellhound (orochi.topstudio.co.jp [202.224.239.193])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C106222F0E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: by hellhound (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A58392140A0; Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:46 +0900 (JST)
From: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-installer: netcfg/use_dhcp parameter can't be allowed on cdrom image
X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 
(patch 15) (Security Through Obscurity) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:46 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Version: 20040430

(Should be this bug to rootskel, cdebconf, or debian-installer-utils?)
debian-installer cdrom image help mentions 'netcfg/use_dhcp=false',
but this parameter is allowed ONLY for netboot image.

Scenario:
1. Add netcfg/use_dhcp=false for boot parameter
2. /lib/debian-installer.d/S25env2debconf is launched
3. S25env2debconf recognized boot parameter correctly, but...
4. templates for netcfg/use_dhcp isn't loaded yet. (netcfg package is
   dynamic component loaded by anna on cdrom image.)
5. debconf-set simply goes fail and forget it.
6. When netcfg/use_dhcp is loaded by anna, default value is 'true'
   from templates. Boot parameter is ignored.

Setting debconf answer at boot parameter is nice feature, but IMHO it needs
some tricks to resolve values of dynamic component templates.

Thanks,
- -- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 

iEYEARECAAYFAkCeU1MACgkQQKW+7XLQPLETnwCgu3mYVOi2cHOXTZg6MQCWSURh
uDcAoLgDPd60UvcOfizJWoQw15Yf+LMB
=1rkM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 248147-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 22:08:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 15:08:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM6T-0003FB-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:08:25 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM0L-00027J-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#248147: fixed in netcfg 0.69
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests

Bug#247734: marked as done (debian-installer: incorrect /etc/hosts localhost line)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247734: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2004 18:33:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 06 11:33:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lns-vlq-14-62-147-222-231.adsl.proxad.net (yellowpig.yi.org) 
[62.147.222.231] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLngw-0004s3-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 11:33:54 -0700
Received: from seventeen
([127.0.0.1] helo=yellowpig.yi.org ident=mail)
by yellowpig.yi.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BLngr-0004eX-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 20:33:49 +0200
Received: (nullmailer pid 17879 invoked by uid 1000);
Thu, 06 May 2004 18:33:48 -
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 20:33:47 +0200
From: Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-installer: incorrect /etc/hosts localhost line
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.58
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

(From Pierre Machard on irc)

Hello dream-installer Team,

/etc/hosts in the debian-installer environnement is not correct
after network configuration is complete (manual).

it read:
127.0.0.1 localhost pingo
10.10.0.17 pingo.miss-knife.net pingo

  From irc:

 there should not be anything after localhost
> migus: are you sure ?
 yp certainly
 dnsdomain is confused if there is something

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

---
Received: (at 247734-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 22:08:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 15:08:26 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM6U-0003Fh-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:08:26 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM0L-00027H-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#247734: fixed in netcfg 0.69
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 0.69

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.69.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netcfg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:34:25 -0700
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg-static netcfg-dhcp netcfg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.69
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#253086: marked as done (README: Uses the name 'ppp-config' rather than 'pppconfig')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253086: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2004 08:03:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 07 01:03:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BXF68-0004l2-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 01:03:13 -0700
Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=localhost)
by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1BXF67-000Jfh-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 08:03:11 +
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id D149110D6EE; Mon,  7 Jun 2004 10:03:05 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: README: Uses the name 'ppp-config' rather than 'pppconfig'
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:03:05 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: netcfg
Version: 0.67
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Here's a patch that corrects the reference to the pppconfig package.

--- README_ORIG 2004-04-13 09:07:27.0 +0200
+++ README  2004-06-07 10:02:05.0 +0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 netcfg is written specifically for the debian-installer and probably won't work
 as expected if you try to run it on a full Debian system.  If you want
-something for a full system, take a look at etherconf or ppp-config (eventually).
+something for a full system, take a look at etherconf or pppconfig.
 
 
 Currently static and dhcp configuration is supported.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 253086-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 22:08:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 15:08:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM6T-0003Ex-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:08:25 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM0L-00027L-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#253086: fixed in netcfg 0.69
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 0.69

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.69.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netcfg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


---

Processing of netcfg_0.69_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

netcfg_0.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  netcfg_0.69.dsc
  netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
  netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
  netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
  netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

netcfg_0.69_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.69.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 247734 248147 253086 253099 253361 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254411: inst report

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Ganesh Sittampalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 17:34]:
> At one point the installer mentioned PCMCIA (I think in the context of
> removing PCMCIA support, but I forget). At no point did it mention that
> you are unlikely to need it if you don't have a laptop (or that you are
> very likely to if you do) - I think this could have saved the blank look I
> got from the user at this point!

Hmm, I don't quite know which message this might be.  Do you remember
details?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#254411: (no subject)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 254411 -1 -2
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Bug 254411 cloned as bugs 254629-254630.

> reassign -1 lvmcfg
Bug#254629: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.

> reassign -2 lvmcfg
Bug#254630: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.

> retitle -1 doesn't tell how to switch to the third console
Bug#254629: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.

> retitle -2 doesn't give good error when bogus LV name is used
Bug#254630: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.

> severity -1 minor
Bug#254629: doesn't tell how to switch to the third console
Severity set to `minor'.

> severity -2 minor
Bug#254630: doesn't give good error when bogus LV name is used
Severity set to `minor'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#254411: (no subject)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 254411 newt
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `newt'.

> retitle 254411 Passwords don't result in * or so echoed
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254411: (no subject)

[Martin Michlmayr]

reassign 254411 newt
retitle 254411 Passwords don't result in * or so echoed
thanks

* Ganesh Sittampalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 17:34]:
> When entering passwords to set up accounts, you don't get *s as you
> type.  This is actually fairly standard for Linux, of course, but
> users tend to find it disorienting especially when there's an
> obvious "box" they are typing into.

I'm not quite sure which program is responsible for this, but maybe
newt.

> In general, dialog box navigation could be explained better. In
> particular the user kept having to be prompted to use TAB to move
> between elements; quite possibly this is in some help somewhere or
> there is a better way, I'm just describing the problems this user
> had.

I think this is http://bugs.debian.org/252751  Can you confirm?

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254411: (no subject)

[Martin Michlmayr]

clone 254411 -1 -2
reassign -1 lvmcfg
reassign -2 lvmcfg
retitle -1 doesn't tell how to switch to the third console
retitle -2 doesn't give good error when bogus LV name is used
severity -1 minor
severity -2 minor
thanks

* Ganesh Sittampalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 17:34]:
> Something (probably the LVM error below) told him to look at the third
> console for an error message. It didn't mention that the way to do this is
> to press Alt-F3.
> 
> If you type disallowed characters in a logical volume name when
> configuring LVM, the installer doesn't notice and you get an unhelpful
> error message when it tries to run lvcreate. I think the dodgy character
> was '/'.

Thanks.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Gleydson Mazioli da Silva]

Hi,

I also have interest to participate on meeting (specially about the install manual 
translation topic). I agreed
with being on Saturday - 19 June - if possible (for most people is the best time to 
participate, because is a 
non work hour).

> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
> (Joey already counted as not attending)
> 
> 1) Christian Perrier / bubulle
>2) Gleydson Mazioli / gleydson

---
Gleydson Mazioli da Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* "Covardes não são homens que choram por amor,mas sim homens que não
amam por medo de chorar"


pgpv458Ca5JzZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#254631: Infinite loop displaying 'Unknown localized field' messages

[Matt Kraai]

Package: debian-installer
Version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-06-14/floppy/

After booting and displaying the low memory warning, d-i loops
forever displaying the following two lines:

 Unknown localized field:
 Description-C.UTF-8:

I used the boot.img and root.img floppy images from the above URL.

The test candidate 1 floppies did not have this problem.

-- 
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254634: Package: installation-reports

[Scott Coburn]

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: sarge beta4
uname -a: Linux pluto 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i486 GNU/Linux
Date: 14 Jun 2004 20:00
Method: floppy boot (boot.img, root.img, cd-drivers.img, net-drivers.img)
then network install from ftp.us.debian.org
Machine: Toshiba T2130CT Laptop
Processor: 486
Memory: 32M
Root Device: ide, /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table: /boot is 32M, swap is 80M, / is 930M.
Output of lspci:

pcilib: Cannot open /proc/bus/pci
lspci: Cannot find any working access method.

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[0]
Configure network HW:   [0]
Config network: [0]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [0]
Detect hard drives: [0]
Partition hard drives:  [0]
Create file systems:[0]
Mount partitions:   [0]
Install base system:[0]
Install boot loader:[0]
Reboot: [0]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

After initial install and reboot the system gives errors when setting
up the PCMCIA network stuff:

/lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.o: init_module: No such 
device
/lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.o: insmod 
/lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.o failed
/lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.o: insmod yenta_socket 
failed

This seems a bit odd since the PCMCIA and networking worked fine for
the initial install.

NIC is PCMCIA 3COM 3c589.

Scott

-- 
: Scott Coburn
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: This message is brought to you by Linux
: "Assume a spherical cow of uniform density..."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DHCP failure on test candidate 1

[Thom Nuzum]

Tried a woody install tiny iso and DHCP setup worked.

> Hi Folks,
> I'm new to Debian.
>
> Just tried the sarge netinst.iso and am unable to get DHCP working during
> install. I skipped the network setup and installed the base system. I
> suppose I can try to setup DHCP again. I know my Internet is correct as I
> have had SuSE detect it and XP.
> .
> (my system note follows)
> Running Athlon XP...120GBNVIDIA,,,Viewsonic VP171.
> System is dualboot: installed debian over SuSE 9.1
> I am using stable kernel as I had major problems with 2.6 and losing my XP
> partition as well as all data
> .
>
> Thanks,
> Thom Nuzum
> Realtor Technology Trainer
> Washington DC
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

无停游泳场馆售票管理系统v2.0

[地价定制管理软件]

无停游泳场馆售票管理系统v2.0  

特点及功能：操作简单，无须培训，即时会用。  
   1.便捷的售票方式,操作简单。  
   2.打印游泳票据。 
   3.完备会员卡设置。(月卡,次卡)功能齐全。 
   4.培训班日程设置，查询，教练信息，学员信息查询方便。 
   5.泳具出售管理，大型泳具出租管理。 
   6.救生员管理，查询，当班日程。 
   7.功能齐全的报表功能。 
   8.另外，游泳时间控制，限制时间内超时，智能提示。 

网站:http://www.3d173.com/swim/
mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:0415-6988442


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23

[Joey Hess]

Apal wrote:
> I tried again :
> Only the normal install (kernel 2.4) is able to load the usb-uhci 
> module, to detect my drive.
> The linux26 install can't load this module. My drive is not recognized.
> Is it possible to fix the linux26 install ?

The module for the 2.6 kernel is called uhci-hcd. Of course our code
will take care of loading the right name once we add your PCI ids to it.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#254631: Infinite loop displaying 'Unknown localized field' messages

[Joey Hess]

Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-06-14/floppy/
> 
> After booting and displaying the low memory warning, d-i loops
> forever displaying the following two lines:
> 
>  Unknown localized field:
>  Description-C.UTF-8:
> 
> I used the boot.img and root.img floppy images from the above URL.
> 
> The test candidate 1 floppies did not have this problem.

This was caused by a mismatch between lowmem and languagechooser, but
AFAIK it's fixed in lowmem 0.9, which should be on the image you tried.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processing of usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  usb-discover_0.17.dsc
  usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
  usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
usb-discover_0.17.dsc
  to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17.dsc
usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
  to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  usb-discover_0.17.dsc
  usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
  usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes REJECTED

[Debian Installer]

Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in the 
Accepted directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17.dsc file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz file already exists in the Accepted directory.


===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Intro & problem: 8139too TX timeout in sarge installer

[Paul Gear]

Hi all,

The mailing list web page says i should introduce myself.  So here goes:

Name:   Paul Gear

Age:32 (and feeling every minute of it)

Location:
Brisbane, Australia

Why i am here:
Trying to convert from Red Hat/Fedora to sarge

Using Linux since:
kernel 0.97

Distros used:
SLS 1.0 (i think), Slackware 3.2 (i think), Red Hat 4.2-9, Fedora Core
1 (almost completely ignorant of Debian)

Roles:
IT Manager in a school
sysadm on 4 different sites (work, home, 2 volunteer orgs)
Java dabbler (using jikes & gcj)


And now, the problem you've all been waiting for: the 8139too driver
seems broken in the sarge installer.  My NIC works fine on Debian 3.0r2
and Red Hat 9, but doesn't work in any of the sarge installers i've
tried (beta3 businesscard, beta4 businesscard, TC1 businesscard and
netinst).

The symptoms are: DHCP fails - my server sees the DHCPDISCOVER and sends
back a DHCPOFFER, but the machine doesn't see it and never gets an IP.
Occasional complaints about TX timeouts are visible in VC4 in the
installer.  It's not cabling (as i said, it works perfectly under 3.0r2
and RH9), but i tried replacing the cable anyway just in case - it made
no difference.

I can complete the installation from the netinst CD and it proceeds to
completion, but on reboot i have the same situation: no network.

My machine is an Athlon 2400+, Gigabyte GA-7N400Pro (NVIDIA nForce
chipset), using an add-on PCI RTL-8139 (i refuse to use the proprietary
nForce NIC driver).

Questions as a result of the above problem:

- What's wrong with the 8139too driver?  My Red Hat system uses kernel
2.4.20 and 8139too version 0.9.26, which is exactly the same version as
is used in the sarge installer.  Is it another component (e.g. mii
module)?  This person seems to have a similar problem:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00483.html
I wonder also whether this could be related:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg01491.html

- Is there a way i can take a basic install of a 3.0r2 system and
upgrade to sarge via apt?

- Is this the best place to ask about this problem?

- Is there a better way to report this bug?

Thanks in advance,
Paul
http://paulgear.webhop.net
-- 
Think context!  Using accepted quoting conventions makes
your email easier to understand.  Learn how at
.


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processing of netcfg_0.70_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

netcfg_0.70_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  netcfg_0.70.dsc
  netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
  netcfg_0.70_i386.udeb
  netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
  netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

netcfg_0.70_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.70.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.70.dsc
netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
netcfg_0.70_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.70_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> I can't make that, I'm afraid. Of your other slots, 23:00 UTC on
> Saturday is fine, and 16:00 UTC works practically every day apart from
> this Wednesday and Saturday.


Hmm, you were among my key people...:-). If Steve isn't available,
we'll either cancel or reschedule (at 23:00UTC). We need at least one
of the people who are able to move packages from unstable to
testingand who are more aware of the build process than me..:-)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254167: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#254027: installation-reports TC1 on Acer TravelMate 800)

[Olivier ROLAND]

First
just for information but it's not the subject here. I will investigate
this later.

Christian I cannot reproduce the bug on sid_d-i (14 Jun) because this
one don't work on my system

I get /bin/sh:line 1:/dev/vc/1:No such file or directory (ten time)

and INIT: Id "1" respawning too fast:disabled for 5 minutes


But I can reproduce the bug on beta4, TC1, daily 06/10 and daily 06/13

As I've already describe before to reproduce this you juste have to

- choose linux26 on cdrom boot

- choose fr_FR

- do a basic install

- first reboot hit é give é OK

- reboot again then hit é give õ NOT OK

It take only twelve minutes to check that.


locale charmap give ISO-8859-15

I've check all locale variables and files and all settings are OK

if i launched base-config then  i've got messy characters in the
borders like in #253211


Maybe someone could take twelves minute to check that on another system
?

If this bug is not there on all system what can I do to determine what
peace of hardware is concerned and how it break something ?


Nota: after the first reboot (an only this one i've got)  info:
switching console charset mapping to ISO-8859-15

Where does this come from ?


Thanks

Debian Installer : 1st stage stats broken (anonymous SVN checkout broken)

[Christian Perrier]

Because anonymous SVN checkout is currently broken for d-i, the 1st
stages statistics are also broken. I'll try to keep you posted with
possible changes.

Non anonymous checkout is possible, however, so you can still commit
your changes.

Can someone fix the anonymous checkout on the SVN repository?
-- 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254167: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#254027: installation-reports TC1 on Acer TravelMate 800)

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> Could you please exactly explain what is wrong?
> 
> OK/not OK is a bit short. What can you do and what cannot you do?


Olivier gave me details in private. Basically this is an issue on
sarge_d-i and still the same bug. This is definitely *not* an issue on
sid_d-i

(Olivier will maybe confirm this today)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254452: Languages switches to english after rebooting during base-config

[Christian Perrier]

> To be hundred percent sure I just downloaded again a daily build of
> the debian-installer for i386 here:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040614/.
> This version has still the issue.

OK. This is a sarge_d-i build, IIRC. Thus d-i packages are from
testing (and non d-i packages from testing also).

You need testing the sid_d-i image, which have d-i packages from
unstable and non d-i packages from testing.



http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso


This build naming scheme is a bit misleading, imho, especially the
"daily" which are a symlink to sarge_d-i.


In another thread, Joey re-gave the link to a page explaining
this. But, imho, we need to make the main d-i page more clear about this...




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposal for a d-i IRC meeting (was: Re: dropping tc1)

[Matt Kraai]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
> possibility.?#debian-boot channel, of course.
> 
> 
> 
> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
> (Joey already counted as not attending)
> 
> 1) Christian Perrier / bubulle

I can attend.

-- 
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Big problem with 20040614 sid_d-i i386 netinst image

[Bastian Blank]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:03:32PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> It sounds like the new libd-i package resolver works for i386. That's a
> nice change.

The next pending change will break cdrom installs, because debian-cd
discards libdebconfclient-udeb and anna can't resolve the virtual
dependency without adding extra tracking for that case. For now it
just ignore the missing package, but this makes it unreliable to decide
if a dependency is realy there. (e.g. partman always checks for the
availability of the module)

Bastian

-- 
Pain is a thing of the mind.  The mind can be controlled.
-- Spock, "Operation -- Annihilate!" stardate 3287.2


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature