Re: Kernel 2.6.20 on Amiga 2000

2007-04-11 Thread Christer Oldhoff
Hello storm66,

On 2007-04-11, you wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I had a try with a 2.6.20 kernel, the kernel compiles without problems
> but won't boot complaining about the root device. [...]
>
> I saw some messages on init for scsi devices such as
>
> sdb: sense not available
> sd 0:0:4:0 rejectiong I/O to offline device
> sdb: Write protect is off
> sd 0:0:4:0 rejecting I/O to offline device
> sdb: asking for cache data failed
> sdb: assuming drive cache: write through
> sd 0:0:4:0 Attached scsi device disk sdb
> ..
> followed by the same kind messages with sdc and 0:0:6:0
> was preceeded by same messages for sda 
>
Yeah, I get those too.

It turns out my statements about what works were a bit sloppy:

The reason my Amiga boots from the 2.6.20 kernel is that I have my Linux 
partitions on an IDE hard disk drive (attached to a Buddha controller).

When I try to mount the SCSI CD-ROM (this works under 2.4.27 and Steigies' 
2.6.18-4), the command "mount /dev/scd0" returns with an error (SCSI ID is 2):
"sr 0:0:2:0: rejecting I/O to offline device".

All SCSI devices are turned offline during the boot process, just as in Your 
case.

Using Steigies' 2.6.18-4 kernel, SCSI works here too.

The web browser w3m quits with an illegal memory access error both under 
2.6.18-4 and 2.6.20.

> [...]
>
> As the keyborad driver is broken since 2.6.18 I can see that the system
> is not full dead but reacting to some keyboard events, 

So far, I haven't noticed any problems with the keyboard, but I have only used 
US characters under 2.6.x.
My installation was configured for a german keyboard under Sarge 3.1r5 with a 
2.4.27 kernel.

I hope this sheds some light on Your problems with 2.6.20...

Attached You find my kern.log from the 2.6.20 boot, with debugging output 
referring to the cirrusfb driver removed, otherwise complete.

Regards,
-- 
Christer Oldhoff
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 11 11:25:39 localhost kernel: klogd 1.4.1#17, log source = /proc/kmsg 
started.
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Cannot find map file.
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernel modules not 
enabled. 
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Linux version 2.6.20-m68k ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
(gcc-Version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)) #1 Tue Apr 10 22:57:47 CEST 2007
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Enabling workaround for errata I14
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Amiga hardware found: [A2000] VIDEO BLITTER 
AUDIO FLOPPY KEYBOARD MOUSE SERIAL PARALLEL A2000_CLK CHIP_RAM PAULA DENISE_HR 
AGNUS_HR_PAL ZORRO 
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 24448
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel:   DMA zone: 214 pages used for memmap
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel:   DMA zone: 0 pages reserved
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel:   DMA zone: 24234 pages, LIFO batch:3
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel:   Normal zone: 0 pages used for memmap
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Built 1 zonelists.  Total pages: 24234
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda8 
video=cirrusfb:monitorcap:56;75;30;60,mode:1024x768,noaccel
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: PID hash table entries: 512 (order: 9, 2048 
bytes)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 
(order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 
3, 32768 bytes)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Memory: 94080k/94112k available (2208k kernel 
code, 1348k data, 124k init)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Calibrating delay loop... 99.32 BogoMIPS 
(lpj=496640)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Capability LSM initialized
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 16
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: SCSI subsystem initialized
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: Zorro: Probing AutoConfig expansion devices: 
7 devices
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 2
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: IP route cache hash table entries: 1024 
(order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: TCP established hash table entries: 4096 
(order: 2, 16384 bytes)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: TCP bind hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 
8192 bytes)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established 4096 
bind 2048)
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: TCP reno registered
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: io scheduler noop registered
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: io scheduler anticipatory registered
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: io scheduler deadline registered
Apr 11 11:25:40 localhost kernel: io scheduler cfq registered (default)
Apr 11 11:25:41 localhost kernel: Console: switching to colour frame buffer 
device 80x25
Apr 11 11:25:41 localhost kernel: fb0: Amiga ECS frame buffer device, using 
640K

[m68k-build] circular build-dep for xulrunner?

2007-04-11 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi,

This is what I get when trying to build xulrunner 1.8.0.11-4:

Checking for source dependency conflicts...
  /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
dpatch libidl-dev libgtk2.0-dev libgnomevfs2-dev libgnome2-dev libgnomeui-dev
libcairo2-dev libpng12-dev libjpeg62-dev zlib1g-dev libbz2-dev libkrb5-dev 
python-dev
python-support libnspr4-dev libnss3-dev
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
E: Package libnspr4-dev has no installation candidate
Package libnspr4-dev is not available, but is referred to by another
package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

libnspr4-dev and libnspr4-0d are available in version 1.8.0.11-2; what's
the problem? (libnspr4-dev is indeed missing from the Packages file, but
why?)

Michael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [m68k-build] circular build-dep for xulrunner?

2007-04-11 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 05:46:22PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is what I get when trying to build xulrunner 1.8.0.11-4:
> 
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
>   /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
> dpatch libidl-dev libgtk2.0-dev libgnomevfs2-dev libgnome2-dev libgnomeui-dev
> libcairo2-dev libpng12-dev libjpeg62-dev zlib1g-dev libbz2-dev libkrb5-dev 
> python-dev
> python-support libnspr4-dev libnss3-dev
> Reading Package Lists...
> Building Dependency Tree...
> E: Package libnspr4-dev has no installation candidate
> Package libnspr4-dev is not available, but is referred to by another
> package.
> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> is only available from another source
> 
> libnspr4-dev and libnspr4-0d are available in version 1.8.0.11-2; what's
> the problem? (libnspr4-dev is indeed missing from the Packages file, but
> why?)

nspr and nss seem to have been split out of xulrunner.

  Package : nspr
  Version : 4.6.6-2
  Builder : buildd_m68k-crest
  State   : Building
 
Should be safe to dep-wait.

nspr seems to have built successfully, it's just waiting on a sig?

Peace,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[buildd] Rotation Additions

2007-04-11 Thread Stephen R Marenka
For those of you playing along at home, akire and washi have now been
added to the regular buildd rotation. We've also cleaned up some other
anomalies.

A big thanks to James and Wouter for making this happen.

We have a few other things in the pipeline.

Let me know if ya'll need other changes or have other big hardware that
needs to be added in.

Needs-Build seems to be going through the roof (partly because we've got
some large packages building), so if some of those buildds are idle 

Peace,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [buildd] Rotation Additions

2007-04-11 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:39:17AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> For those of you playing along at home, akire and washi have now been
> added to the regular buildd rotation. We've also cleaned up some other
> anomalies.

One remark: 

Building:79 (buildd-m68k_washi: 5, buildd_m68k-aahz: 3,
 buildd_m68k-akire: 8, buildd_m68k-crest: 29,

buildd-m68k_washi
buildd_m68k-akire
--^^
- and _ are swapped for washi. Can this be reverted? Just curious... ;)

-- 
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [buildd] Rotation Additions

2007-04-11 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:48:36PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:39:17AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > For those of you playing along at home, akire and washi have now been
> > added to the regular buildd rotation. We've also cleaned up some other
> > anomalies.
> 
> One remark: 
> 
> Building:79 (buildd-m68k_washi: 5, buildd_m68k-aahz: 3,
>  buildd_m68k-akire: 8, buildd_m68k-crest: 29,
> 
> buildd-m68k_washi
> buildd_m68k-akire
> --^^
> - and _ are swapped for washi. Can this be reverted? Just curious... ;)

I already brought that up. It'll be fixed in time.

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Etch/m68k

2007-04-11 Thread Ryan Murray
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:45:18 +0200
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:14:31AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:22:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > After that, it's probably best to get some machines up and running to
> > > build for etch/m68k. Most of the packages that aren't built there yet
> > > aren't because we were backlogged at the time, I guess, and those should
> > > probably build without issues. It will require a patched sbuild,
> > > probably, but that's not a big issue.
> > 
> > Couldn't we just do that under the existing w-b setup or will there be
> > no support for that?
> 
> Honestly, I dunno. Ryan?

I haven't tried to see what all we need changing with the current code
to handle "etch-m68k" as a suite name, but don't see why it can't
be there while the archive is being hosted on ftp-master.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature