Re: Node Update CPUNK
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Bill Stewart wrote: > So does changing the Subject: line of messages count as moderation? :-) > I really do not see why people insist on screwing around with the subject line. Why not just add a line to the header of the messages, say X-Filter: CPUNKS. That way those who wish to continue with this silly filter business can do so without bothering the rest of us. -- --- William H. Geiger IIIhttp://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Data Security & Cryptology Consulting Programming, Networking, Analysis PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html ---
Re: Has RSADSI Lost their mind?
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Lucky Green wrote: > William, > [Several overlapping, and in some cases inappropriate, CC's elided]. > In your oppinion. > I suspect the original message you are referring to is a spoof. Even if > the message is not a spoof, the licensing terms of OpenSSL and SSLeay are > included with every one of the countless copies of both libraries that > have been distributed on the Internet over the years. Anybody, which most > definitely includes you, can verify within minutes that OpenSSL and SSLeay > ship with a with a world-wide, perpetual, royalty-free license. > The point of the message was to show the behaviour of RSADSI's employee's when talking to potential customers not wether or not they had a legal leg to stand on. From my previous interactions with RSADSI and their past legal actions with PGP Inc. I do not think that the original post was a spoof. > Now what I would like to know is this: why are you wasting the time of > thousands of individuals by spamming numerous mailing lists with FUD that > could have been trivially disproved by spending less than 5 minutes on > research? > IMHO the FUD is comming from RSADSI. -- --- William H. Geiger IIIhttp://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Data Security & Cryptology Consulting Programming, Networking, Analysis PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html ---
Re: More blather from the DEMS on FL
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Tim May wrote: > At 10:35 AM -0500 11/8/00, William H. Geiger III wrote: > >While the recount of the FL ballots is going on the Democrats are now > >complaining about the format of the ballot and threating legal action. It > >seems that the ballot is "confusing". The complaint is that the double > >sided ballot contained 2 columns on each side rather than one. > > > >I personally used the FL ballot. It was large, well printed, and quite > >legible. Anyone who was "confused" by it's format is just too dam stupid > >to vote. > > > >I am starting to get the feeling that the SC is going to decide this > >election before it is all over. :( > > "It dis-crim-nated 'gainst da homeys." > > Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are calling rallies to get certain > results "investigated." Marches are planned. And Jeb Bush has flown > back to Florida to supervise the recount. > > Yep, I think that whatever result is finally reported, the > recriminations and charges of election fraud will continue. > > We'll have another president addressed as "Your Fraudulency." > > Sounds good to me. > One has to admit that there is some sweet irony of radical left wingers voting for Pat Buchanan because they are too dam stupid to figure out the ballot. Social Evolution at work. LOL!!! -- --- William H. Geiger IIIhttp://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Data Security & Cryptology Consulting Programming, Networking, Analysis PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html ---
Re: More blather from the DEMS on FL
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Me wrote: > - Original Message - > X-Loop: openpgp.net > From: "William H. Geiger III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > While the recount of the FL ballots is going on the Democrats > are now > > complaining about the format of the ballot and threating legal > action. It > > seems that the ballot is "confusing". The complaint is that the > double > > sided ballot contained 2 columns on each side rather than one. > > Even better tactic: > > CNN just reported that the Little House in the Ghetto nursery > school found an abandoned voting-box full of Al Gore ballots... > er, some election worker must have forgot them there last night. > Better get them into the count. > Anyone know what the law on this is? One would think that they would have to maintain some type of "chain of evidence" with the ballots. -- --- William H. Geiger IIIhttp://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Data Security & Cryptology Consulting Programming, Networking, Analysis PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html ---
Re: geezers and ballots
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you look at http://cnews.tribune.com/news/image/0,1119,oso-nation-82373,00.html > you see the gripe about the Palm Beach > ballots. > > What they dont mention is that, by > the same visual-illiteracy that > lets Gore votes go to Buchanan, > votes for Browne go to Gore. > > There is far more difference between > Browne Gore than between Gore > Buchanan. The libs ought to be > furious. I think that you find that the Libertarians are smart enough to figure out a ballot and vote for the candidate that they want. Unfortunatly the same can't be said for the liberals. -- --- William H. Geiger IIIhttp://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Data Security & Cryptology Consulting Programming, Networking, Analysis PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html ---
