On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Lucky Green wrote:
> William,
> [Several overlapping, and in some cases inappropriate, CC's elided].
>
In your oppinion.
> I suspect the original message you are referring to is a spoof. Even if
> the message is not a spoof, the licensing terms of OpenSSL and SSLeay are
> included with every one of the countless copies of both libraries that
> have been distributed on the Internet over the years. Anybody, which most
> definitely includes you, can verify within minutes that OpenSSL and SSLeay
> ship with a with a world-wide, perpetual, royalty-free license.
>
The point of the message was to show the behaviour of RSADSI's employee's
when talking to potential customers not wether or not they had a legal leg
to stand on. From my previous interactions with RSADSI and their past
legal actions with PGP Inc. I do not think that the original post was a
spoof.
> Now what I would like to know is this: why are you wasting the time of
> thousands of individuals by spamming numerous mailing lists with FUD that
> could have been trivially disproved by spending less than 5 minutes on
> research?
>
IMHO the FUD is comming from RSADSI.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net
Geiger Consulting
Data Security & Cryptology Consulting
Programming, Networking, Analysis
PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html
---------------------------------------------------------------
