Re: [CentOS] sed a particular line in file

[Tom Brown]

> % cat foo
> Hello line 1
> Hello line 2
> Hello line 3
>
> # To change just line 2
> % sed '2s/Hello/There/'
> Hello line 1
> There line 2
> Hello line 3
>
> # To change line 2 and onwards
> % sed '2,$s/Hello/There/'
> Hello line 1
> There line 2
> There line 3
>
> It's that simple :-)
>
>   

yes indeed - simples

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Cobbler import files with rsync error

[Tom Brown]

>
> The problem is, as soon as I get this error, I can't re-import the
> exact same image and need to specify a new name as well.  How do I
> clear this up? "cobbler image list" doesn't show the failed-imported
> images.
>
>   

i would suggest

cobb...@lists.fedorahosted.org

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Cobbler import files with rsync error

[Rudi Ahlers]

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Tom Brown  wrote:
>
>>
>> The problem is, as soon as I get this error, I can't re-import the
>> exact same image and need to specify a new name as well.  How do I
>> clear this up? "cobbler image list" doesn't show the failed-imported
>> images.
>>
>>
>
> i would suggest
>
> cobb...@lists.fedorahosted.org
>
> ___



Thanx Tom. That's the obvious place to ask for help, but since so many
people on this list suggested Cobbler, I thought they would at least
know how to actually use it, or help with problems.


-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] VPN

[cahit Eyigünlü]

is there any possibility to do this on cent os

for example company one will be in the block of 10.0.0.0.1-10.0.0.255
and routed to the one of my external ip
company two will be in the block of 11.0.0.0.1-11.0.0.255 and routed
to the one of my external ip

i just need an advice is this better on windows vpn or llinux vpn
server do you advice me any server software like open vpn or sth. else

thank you very much i am glad for all your help i will rent a new
server after complete a working system on virtual machine thanks ..
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[John R Pierce]

cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> is there any possibility to do this on cent os
>
> for example company one will be in the block of 10.0.0.0.1-10.0.0.255
> and routed to the one of my external ip
> company two will be in the block of 11.0.0.0.1-11.0.0.255 and routed
> to the one of my external ip
>

I am not sure what you mean by 'routed to one of your external ip 
addresses'.

so, you are at a third site, and want a tunnel to both companies networks?

btw, I know those are just example addresses, but 11.x.x.x is not a 
reserved network   instead, that should be 10.1.0.xxx or something.

> i just need an advice is this better on windows vpn or llinux vpn
> server do you advice me any server software like open vpn or sth. else

assuming its a routing that makes logical sense, it should be easy to 
implement with OpenVPN.  you'd need a firewall running openvpn at each 
of those companies then your end could inititate the connections to each 
of them.  I'm not sure why you'd have to use two internet addresses at 
your end, rather, you'd just have an net like 10.2.0.xxx and the VPN 
tunnels would route between those networks.   I'm assuming company 1 and 
company 2 don't want any direct routing between them, so you'd have to 
make sure you're not providing that route (eg, 10.0.0.xxx should not 
have a route to 10.1.0.xxx or visa versa)


as far as 'better'?  better is what you or the people who will be 
administrating this is most familar with.   often, easiest is to use VPN 
appliance routers, like watchguards, or netscreens as the firewalls at 
all these sites.





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[cahit Eyigünlü]

Unfotunately i have to solve this based on software
i need to isolate each company to protect their info from others
i have 3 companies
and last one thing i need to see each company's traffic statics for long
time periods. and i need to be able to limit their traffics
that is all ,
but as i see on open vpn i could not group users.i have a cisco router which
i could see the traffic of my servers external  ip addresses so i decide to
see them from there via giving each company one external ip to connect to
internet .
but i could not decide yet how to do it :)
is there any body have an advice for me ?

2010/4/10 John R Pierce 

> cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> > is there any possibility to do this on cent os
> >
> > for example company one will be in the block of 10.0.0.0.1-10.0.0.255
> > and routed to the one of my external ip
> > company two will be in the block of 11.0.0.0.1-11.0.0.255 and routed
> > to the one of my external ip
> >
>
> I am not sure what you mean by 'routed to one of your external ip
> addresses'.
>
> so, you are at a third site, and want a tunnel to both companies networks?
>
> btw, I know those are just example addresses, but 11.x.x.x is not a
> reserved network   instead, that should be 10.1.0.xxx or something.
>
> > i just need an advice is this better on windows vpn or llinux vpn
> > server do you advice me any server software like open vpn or sth. else
>
> assuming its a routing that makes logical sense, it should be easy to
> implement with OpenVPN.  you'd need a firewall running openvpn at each
> of those companies then your end could inititate the connections to each
> of them.  I'm not sure why you'd have to use two internet addresses at
> your end, rather, you'd just have an net like 10.2.0.xxx and the VPN
> tunnels would route between those networks.   I'm assuming company 1 and
> company 2 don't want any direct routing between them, so you'd have to
> make sure you're not providing that route (eg, 10.0.0.xxx should not
> have a route to 10.1.0.xxx or visa versa)
>
>
> as far as 'better'?  better is what you or the people who will be
> administrating this is most familar with.   often, easiest is to use VPN
> appliance routers, like watchguards, or netscreens as the firewalls at
> all these sites.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[Eero Volotinen]

2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
> Unfotunately i have to solve this based on software
> i need to isolate each company to protect their info from others
> i have 3 companies
> and last one thing i need to see each company's traffic statics for long
> time periods. and i need to be able to limit their traffics
> that is all ,
> but as i see on open vpn i could not group users.i have a cisco router which
> i could see the traffic of my servers external  ip addresses so i decide to
> see them from there via giving each company one external ip to connect to
> internet .
> but i could not decide yet how to do it :)
> is there any body have an advice for me ?
> 2010/4/10 John R Pierce 

Solution is static routing tables and openvpn site-to-site tunnel.

--
Eero,
RHCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[cahit Eyigünlü]

I will check this out thank you so much

2010/4/10 Eero Volotinen 

> 2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
> > Unfotunately i have to solve this based on software
> > i need to isolate each company to protect their info from others
> > i have 3 companies
> > and last one thing i need to see each company's traffic statics for long
> > time periods. and i need to be able to limit their traffics
> > that is all ,
> > but as i see on open vpn i could not group users.i have a cisco router
> which
> > i could see the traffic of my servers external  ip addresses so i decide
> to
> > see them from there via giving each company one external ip to connect to
> > internet .
> > but i could not decide yet how to do it :)
> > is there any body have an advice for me ?
> > 2010/4/10 John R Pierce 
>
> Solution is static routing tables and openvpn site-to-site tunnel.
>
> --
> Eero,
> RHCE
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[cahit Eyigünlü]

i am looking to open vpn remote page now do you know where could i set
client's sites that allow to connect or not ?

10 Nisan 2010 13:36 tarihinde cahit Eyigünlü yazdı:

> I will check this out thank you so much
>
> 2010/4/10 Eero Volotinen 
>
> 2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
>> > Unfotunately i have to solve this based on software
>> > i need to isolate each company to protect their info from others
>> > i have 3 companies
>> > and last one thing i need to see each company's traffic statics for long
>> > time periods. and i need to be able to limit their traffics
>> > that is all ,
>> > but as i see on open vpn i could not group users.i have a cisco router
>> which
>> > i could see the traffic of my servers external  ip addresses so i decide
>> to
>> > see them from there via giving each company one external ip to connect
>> to
>> > internet .
>> > but i could not decide yet how to do it :)
>> > is there any body have an advice for me ?
>> > 2010/4/10 John R Pierce 
>>
>> Solution is static routing tables and openvpn site-to-site tunnel.
>>
>> --
>> Eero,
>> RHCE
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[Eero Volotinen]

2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
> i am looking to open vpn remote page now do you know where could i set
> client's sites that allow to connect or not ?

err.

See documentation at http://www.openvpn.net or hire network consult?

--
Eero,
RHCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[Ian Murray]

>i am looking to open vpn remote page now do you know where could i set 
>client's sites that allow to connect or not ?

I can't remember if there are other controls, but AFAIK the primary method of 
saying who is allowed is via certificates that you create when setting it up.

It is still unclear to me what you are trying to achieve.

Is it that you have three sites...

A <-> B <-> C

where <-> represents the VPN link? Is it that A needs to talk to B, B to C, but 
you don't want A to talk to C? If that is the case, I think it needs to be 
solved with a combination of VPN's as described and Iptables to stop the A to C 
conversation..


  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[cahit Eyigünlü]

yes exactly that is what i need to do murrayei
could you describe a little more

2010/4/10 Ian Murray 

>
> >i am looking to open vpn remote page now do you know where could i set
> client's sites that allow to connect or not ?
>
> I can't remember if there are other controls, but AFAIK the primary method
> of saying who is allowed is via certificates that you create when setting it
> up.
>
> It is still unclear to me what you are trying to achieve.
>
> Is it that you have three sites...
>
> A <-> B <-> C
>
> where <-> represents the VPN link? Is it that A needs to talk to B, B to C,
> but you don't want A to talk to C? If that is the case, I think it needs to
> be solved with a combination of VPN's as described and Iptables to stop the
> A to C conversation..
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[Ian Murray]

>yes exactly that is what i need to do murrayei
>could you describe a little more

If 'B' in my previous description is a single machine, need not route and the A 
to C issue goes away.

My OpenVPN/Iptables skills are not strong enough to describe it in general 
terms and has been previously stated, you are better off going through the 
support channels of OpenVPN, rather than CentOS. If simple firewalling using 
Iptables is a new or a difficult concept, then you might want to get some 
hands-on help, as was also suggested. 

To answer your original question, though, I wouldn't know where to start to 
solve restriction of "A to C" using Windows, whereas I am pretty sure you will 
have all the tools you need under CentOS/OpenVPN... for free.



  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[cahit Eyigünlü]

i mis understood sorry A B and C are companies not alone computers and they
have client computers

2010/4/10 Ian Murray 

>
>
> >yes exactly that is what i need to do murrayei
> >could you describe a little more
>
> If 'B' in my previous description is a single machine, need not route and
> the A to C issue goes away.
>
> My OpenVPN/Iptables skills are not strong enough to describe it in general
> terms and has been previously stated, you are better off going through the
> support channels of OpenVPN, rather than CentOS. If simple firewalling using
> Iptables is a new or a difficult concept, then you might want to get some
> hands-on help, as was also suggested.
>
> To answer your original question, though, I wouldn't know where to start to
> solve restriction of "A to C" using Windows, whereas I am pretty sure you
> will have all the tools you need under CentOS/OpenVPN... for free.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] is skype using encryption?

[Jozsi Vadkan]

Can someone [same subnet, e.g.: with a hub, not switch..] sniff my skype
password when i'm using Skype? Is it encrypted? 

Thank you for the info


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] is skype using encryption?

[Timo Schoeler]

On 04/10/2010 04:55 PM, Jozsi Vadkan wrote:
> Can someone [same subnet, e.g.: with a hub, not switch..] sniff my skype
> password when i'm using Skype?

Nope.

> Is it encrypted?

Yupp...

> Thank you for the info

For more information, check this:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/12/nsa_offers_billions_for_skype_pwnage/

http://www.ossir.org/windows/supports/2005/2005-11-07/EADS-CCR_Fabrice_Skype.pdf

HTH,

Timo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[Les Mikesell]

cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> Unfotunately i have to solve this based on software 
> i need to isolate each company to protect their info from others 
> i have 3 companies
> and last one thing i need to see each company's traffic statics for long 
> time periods. and i need to be able to limit their traffics
> that is all ,
> but as i see on open vpn i could not group users.i have a cisco router 
> which i could see the traffic of my servers external  ip addresses so i 
> decide to see them from there via giving each company one external ip to 
> connect to internet .
> but i could not decide yet how to do it :) 
> is there any body have an advice for me ?

I don't understand the role of a vpn here.  Normally you would split address 
ranges and use firewalling (iptables on linux, access control lists on a cisco) 
on the interfaces where they connect.  So your 3 companies would simply be 
split 
into different subnets with routing between them blocked on the device where 
they connect.  A VPN is used if you need to connect things through a firewall 
that would otherwise block it - you might use that for your administrative 
access through the firewalls of for portions of companies in remote locations.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] file sharing?

[Roland Roland]

Hi all,

I've inherited from a previous It personnel a centos server which works as a 
fileserver and at the same time has one Vmware (windows xp) working on it.
due to file server data load, the windows xp services get unreachable until the 
data transfer from the fileserver itself slows down..
the NIC max out its transfer speed..
the same server has two * 1 GB nics
one is currently being used..
my question is this:

is there a way to make the afp/smb services work only one ONE nic..
in other words users accessing the shared files from a specific NIC..
that way I can divide the load. file transfers goes from one NIC and windows 
services gets reached from the other..(different IPs)
doo all this make any sense? is there any other way of solving this (other than 
moving the VM elsewhere) ?

thanks in advance for yoru help


__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 5015 (20100410) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

<>___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] file sharing?

[JohnS]

On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 19:33 +0300, Roland Roland wrote:
> Hi all,
>  

>  
> is there a way to make the afp/smb services work only one ONE nic..
> in other words users accessing the shared files from a specific NIC..
> that way I can divide the load. file transfers goes from one NIC and
> windows services gets reached from the other..(different IPs)
> doo all this make any sense? is there any other way of solving this
> (other than moving the VM elsewhere) ?

---
If its samba you can use "interface=192.x.x.x" in smb.conf

John

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] file sharing?

[Ross Walker]

On Apr 10, 2010, at 12:33 PM, "Roland Roland"  
 wrote:



Hi all,

I've inherited from a previous It personnel a centos server which  
works as a fileserver and at the same time has one Vmware (windows  
xp) working on it.
due to file server data load, the windows xp services get  
unreachable until the data transfer from the fileserver itself slows  
down..

the NIC max out its transfer speed..
the same server has two * 1 GB nics
one is currently being used..
my question is this:

is there a way to make the afp/smb services work only one ONE nic..
in other words users accessing the shared files from a specific NIC..
that way I can divide the load. file transfers goes from one NIC and  
windows services gets reached from the other..(different IPs)
doo all this make any sense? is there any other way of solving this  
(other than moving the VM elsewhere) ?


thanks in advance for yoru help


At the same time make sure the VM's vmdk file isn't on the same disks  
as the file data or you will have the VM starve for IO while the file  
data is being written/read.


-Ross

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] file sharing?

[Les Mikesell]

Roland Roland wrote:
> Hi all,
>  
> I've inherited from a previous It personnel a centos server which works 
> as a fileserver and at the same time has one Vmware (windows xp) working 
> on it.
> due to file server data load, the windows xp services get unreachable 
> until the data transfer from the fileserver itself slows down..
> the NIC max out its transfer speed..
> the same server has two * 1 GB nics
> one is currently being used..
> my question is this:
>  
> is there a way to make the afp/smb services work only one ONE nic..
> in other words users accessing the shared files from a specific NIC..
> that way I can divide the load. file transfers goes from one NIC and 
> windows services gets reached from the other..(different IPs)
> doo all this make any sense? is there any other way of solving this 
> (other than moving the VM elsewhere) ?
>  
> thanks in advance for yoru help Smile emoticon

I'd leave the file sharing side alone and change the Vmware settings to bridge 
to the other NIC - and I think you can do that without even giving it an IP 
address on the centos side which will avoid routing problems if they live on 
the 
same subnet.

Longer term, you might want to look at putting VMware ESXi on the bare metal 
and 
running the Centos and windows servers as separate guests.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[cahit Eyigünlü]

how could i install pkcs11 on 64 cent os 5.4 :S it always asking me for
pkcs11-helper but i've already installing


[r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz

hata: Failed build dependencies:

pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64

[r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm

uyarı: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
NOKEY, key ID 849bf240

hata: Failed dependencies:

pkcs11-helper = 1.06 is needed by
pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64

libopenssl-devel is needed by pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64

[r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm

uyarı: pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature:
NOKEY, key ID 3dbdc284

   1:pkcs11-helper  ###
[100%]

[r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm

uyarı: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
NOKEY, key ID 849bf240

hata: Failed dependencies:

pkcs11-helper = 1.06 is needed by
pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64

libopenssl-devel is needed by pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[Ned Slider]

cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> how could i install pkcs11 on 64 cent os 5.4 :S it always asking me for
> pkcs11-helper but i've already installing
> 
> 
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
> 



Anything wrong with:

yum install openvpn

rpmforge has packages:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge


However, I'd seriously recommend you stop. Take a week to read the 
documentation or hire someone who knows what they are doing as you are 
falling over at every step you try to take. I fear you are in for a long 
painful journey.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[Agile Aspect]

2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
> how could i install pkcs11 on 64 cent os 5.4 :S it always asking me for
> pkcs11-helper but i've already installing
>
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
>
> hata: Failed build dependencies:
>
>     pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64
>
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
>
> uyarı: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
> NOKEY, key ID 849bf240
>
> hata: Failed dependencies:
>
>     pkcs11-helper = 1.06 is needed by
> pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
>
>     libopenssl-devel is needed by pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
>
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm
>
> uyarı: pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature:
> NOKEY, key ID 3dbdc284
>
>    1:pkcs11-helper  ###
> [100%]
>
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
>
> uyarı: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
> NOKEY, key ID 849bf240
>
> hata: Failed dependencies:
>
>     pkcs11-helper = 1.06 is needed by
> pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
>
>     libopenssl-devel is needed by pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>

You appeared to have installed the source

  rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm

but you still need to build and install the binaries.

Or just install the binaries for pkcs11-helper.

-- 
  Enjoy global warming while it lasts.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[Agile Aspect]

2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
> how could i install pkcs11 on 64 cent os 5.4 :S it always asking me for
> pkcs11-helper but i've already installing
>
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
>
> hata: Failed build dependencies:
>
>     pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64
>
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
>
> uyarı: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
> NOKEY, key ID 849bf240
>
> hata: Failed dependencies:
>
>     pkcs11-helper = 1.06 is needed by
> pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
>
>     libopenssl-devel is needed by pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
>
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm
>
> uyarı: pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature:
> NOKEY, key ID 3dbdc284
>
>    1:pkcs11-helper  ###
> [100%]
>
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
>
> uyarı: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
> NOKEY, key ID 849bf240
>
> hata: Failed dependencies:
>
>     pkcs11-helper = 1.06 is needed by
> pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
>
>     libopenssl-devel is needed by pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>


And you may need to install openssl-devel.


-- 
  Enjoy global warming while it lasts.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[John R Pierce]

cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> yes exactly that is what i need to do murrayei
> could you describe a little more

you either need to learn wide area networking principles as well as the 
ins and outs of VPN software, so you can solve these problems yourself, 
or hire someone so qualified if you want specific solutions.  over and 
over again, you are asking this list to solve your business problems, 
for which you are presumably being paid.




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[cahit Eyigünlü]

still the same :(

[r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz

hata: Failed build dependencies:

pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64

[r...@vpn VpnSetup]# dir

=
lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.i386.rpm pkcs11-helper-1.06.tar.bz2.1

libopenssl-devel-0.9.8k-3.4_3.7.1.x86_64.delta.rpm
lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.i386.rpm.1   pkcs11-helper-1.06.tgz

libopenssl-devel-0.9.8m-1.2.i586.rpm
lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.x86_64.rpm.html  pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm

lzo-1.08-4.2.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm
minilzo-2.03.tar.gz
pkcs11-helper-1.07.tar.bz2

lzo-1.08-4.rf.src.rpm
openssl-1.0.0.tar.gz
pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm

lzo-devel-1.08-2.el4.i386.rpm   openvpn-2.1.1
rpm-3.0.6-4.i386.rpm

lzo-devel-1.08-4.1.el3.rf.i386.rpm  openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz

lzo-devel-1.08-4.2.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm
pkcs11-helper-1.06.tar.bz2

i think

2010/4/10 Agile Aspect 

> 2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
> > how could i install pkcs11 on 64 cent os 5.4 :S it always asking me for
> > pkcs11-helper but i've already installing
> >
> > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
> >
> > hata: Failed build dependencies:
> >
> > pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64
> >
> > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
> >
> > uyarı: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
> > NOKEY, key ID 849bf240
> >
> > hata: Failed dependencies:
> >
> > pkcs11-helper = 1.06 is needed by
> > pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
> >
> > libopenssl-devel is needed by pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
> >
> > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm
> >
> > uyarı: pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature:
> > NOKEY, key ID 3dbdc284
> >
> >1:pkcs11-helper  ###
> > [100%]
> >
> > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
> >
> > uyarı: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
> > NOKEY, key ID 849bf240
> >
> > hata: Failed dependencies:
> >
> > pkcs11-helper = 1.06 is needed by
> > pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
> >
> > libopenssl-devel is needed by pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> >
>
>
> And you may need to install openssl-devel.
>
>
> --
>  Enjoy global warming while it lasts.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VPN

[cahit Eyigünlü]

Thank you so much

2010/4/10 John R Pierce 

> cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> > yes exactly that is what i need to do murrayei
> > could you describe a little more
>
> you either need to learn wide area networking principles as well as the
> ins and outs of VPN software, so you can solve these problems yourself,
> or hire someone so qualified if you want specific solutions.  over and
> over again, you are asking this list to solve your business problems,
> for which you are presumably being paid.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] is skype using encryption?

[Jozsi Vadkan]

thank you! :)

2010. 04. 10, szombat keltezéssel 17.04-kor Timo Schoeler ezt írta:
> On 04/10/2010 04:55 PM, Jozsi Vadkan wrote:
> > Can someone [same subnet, e.g.: with a hub, not switch..] sniff my skype
> > password when i'm using Skype?
> 
> Nope.
> 
> > Is it encrypted?
> 
> Yupp...
> 
> > Thank you for the info
> 
> For more information, check this:
> 
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/12/nsa_offers_billions_for_skype_pwnage/
> 
> http://www.ossir.org/windows/supports/2005/2005-11-07/EADS-CCR_Fabrice_Skype.pdf
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Timo
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Les Mikesell]

http://EleaseDusen2292.co.cc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[Agile Aspect]

2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
> still the same :(
>

And why would anything change?

All you did was show us the same command again which failed the first time.

Binaries setting in a directory are worthless.

Since you're clueless, don't use rpmbuild.

Last try

   yum remove pkcs11\*
   yum install lzo
   yum install openssl-devel
   tar xzf openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
   cd openvpn-2.1.1
   ./configure --prefix=/usr
   make
   make install

-- 
  Enjoy global warming while it lasts.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[Les Mikesell]

cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> still the same :( 
> 
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
> 
> hata: Failed build dependencies:
> 
> pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64
> 
> [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# dir
> 
> =   
> lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.i386.rpm pkcs11-helper-1.06.tar.bz2.1
> 
> libopenssl-devel-0.9.8k-3.4_3.7.1.x86_64.delta.rpm  
> lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.i386.rpm.1   pkcs11-helper-1.06.tgz
> 
> libopenssl-devel-0.9.8m-1.2.i586.rpm
> lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.x86_64.rpm.html  pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm
> 
> lzo-1.08-4.2.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm  
> minilzo-2.03.tar.gz  pkcs11-helper-1.07.tar.bz2
> 
> lzo-1.08-4.rf.src.rpm   
> openssl-1.0.0.tar.gz 
> pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
> 
> lzo-devel-1.08-2.el4.i386.rpm   
> openvpn-2.1.1rpm-3.0.6-4.i386.rpm
> 
> lzo-devel-1.08-4.1.el3.rf.i386.rpm  openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
> 
> lzo-devel-1.08-4.2.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm
> pkcs11-helper-1.06.tar.bz2
> 
> i think 

What are you trying to accomplish here?  It looks like you are mixing a 
horrible 
mess of rpms from different repositories and source tarballs.  If you just want 
openvpn, set up yum to use the EPEL repository,
yum install openvpn
and you are done.  Generally speaking, you can use yum with one (and only one) 
3rd party repository without a lot of trouble and it will take care of all 
dependencies.  If you start mixing things from different 3rd party repos you 
will run into many dependency problems but it is still usually easier to work 
around them than to build source tarballs and keep them up to date yourself.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[James Bensley]

What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
it times out?

--
Regards,
James.

http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Rudi Ahlers]

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Bensley  wrote:
> What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
> it times out?
>
> --
> Regards,
> James.
>
> http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
> ___


It is spam.Either Mike spammed the list, or he has a virus.

-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[cahit Eyigünlü]

Hello les ;
login as: root

[r...@vpn ~]# yum install openvpn
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
 * addons: ftp.plusline.de
 * base: ftp.plusline.de
 * extras: ftp.plusline.de
 * updates: ftp.plusline.de
addons   |  951 B 00:00
addons/primary   |  203 B 00:00
base | 2.1 kB 00:00
base/primary_db  | 2.0 MB 00:00
extras   | 2.1 kB 00:00
extras/primary_db| 206 kB 00:00
updates  | 1.9 kB 00:00
updates/primary_db   | 760 kB 00:00
Setting up Install Process
No package openvpn available.
Nothing to do
[r...@vpn ~]#


2010/4/10 Les Mikesell 

> cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> > still the same :(
> >
> > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
> >
> > hata: Failed build dependencies:
> >
> > pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64
> >
> > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# dir
> >
> > =
> > lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.i386.rpm pkcs11-helper-1.06.tar.bz2.1
> >
> > libopenssl-devel-0.9.8k-3.4_3.7.1.x86_64.delta.rpm
> > lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.i386.rpm.1   pkcs11-helper-1.06.tgz
> >
> > libopenssl-devel-0.9.8m-1.2.i586.rpm
> > lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.x86_64.rpm.html  pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm
> >
> > lzo-1.08-4.2.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm
> > minilzo-2.03.tar.gz  pkcs11-helper-1.07.tar.bz2
> >
> > lzo-1.08-4.rf.src.rpm
> > openssl-1.0.0.tar.gz
> > pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
> >
> > lzo-devel-1.08-2.el4.i386.rpm
> > openvpn-2.1.1rpm-3.0.6-4.i386.rpm
> >
> > lzo-devel-1.08-4.1.el3.rf.i386.rpm  openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
> >
> > lzo-devel-1.08-4.2.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm
> > pkcs11-helper-1.06.tar.bz2
> >
> > i think
>
> What are you trying to accomplish here?  It looks like you are mixing a
> horrible
> mess of rpms from different repositories and source tarballs.  If you just
> want
> openvpn, set up yum to use the EPEL repository,
> yum install openvpn
> and you are done.  Generally speaking, you can use yum with one (and only
> one)
> 3rd party repository without a lot of trouble and it will take care of all
> dependencies.  If you start mixing things from different 3rd party repos
> you
> will run into many dependency problems but it is still usually easier to
> work
> around them than to build source tarballs and keep them up to date
> yourself.
>
> --
>   Les Mikesell
>lesmikes...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[cahit Eyigünlü]

this three line returned error all the others ok :

  yum install lzo
  make
  make install


2010/4/10 Agile Aspect 

> 2010/4/10 cahit Eyigünlü :
> > still the same :(
> >
>
> And why would anything change?
>
> All you did was show us the same command again which failed the first time.
>
> Binaries setting in a directory are worthless.
>
> Since you're clueless, don't use rpmbuild.
>
> Last try
>
>   yum remove pkcs11\*
>   yum install lzo
>   yum install openssl-devel
>   tar xzf openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
>   cd openvpn-2.1.1
>   ./configure --prefix=/usr
>   make
>   make install
>
> --
>   Enjoy global warming while it lasts.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Akemi Yagi]

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Rudi Ahlers  wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Bensley  wrote:
>> What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
>> it times out?

> It is spam.Either Mike spammed the list, or he has a virus.

Or spammer used a forged 'From' address. Also, please do NOT copy the
URL that appeared in the spammer's post when replying to this thread.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[Frank Cox]

On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 23:29 +0300, cahit Eyigünlü wrote:

You need to read the instructions you are given and follow them.

Specifically, this part:
> set up yum to use the EPEL repository,


-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] ulimit

[Matt]

I need to to change the ulimit to 16384(ulimit -n 16384) on boot on
Centos 5.4 64 bit.  How do I do that?  Been searching and have yet to
find a good answer.  Tried to do it in rc.local but it appears to
happen to late there.

Matt
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[aurfalien]

Yea, this same link hit another tech list I'm on, albeit redirected  
from a diff link to the exact same URL.

Its prolly meant to just drive traffic to the site, wether you buy any  
thing is irrelevant.

Some get paid just by you hitting the URL.

- aurf
On Apr 10, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Rudi Ahlers   
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Bensley  
>>  wrote:
>>> What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site,  
>>> eventually
>>> it times out?
>
>> It is spam.Either Mike spammed the list, or he has a virus.
>
> Or spammer used a forged 'From' address. Also, please do NOT copy the
> URL that appeared in the spammer's post when replying to this thread.
>
> Akemi
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Installing a .ko file?

[Slack-Moehrle]

Hi All,

I am trying to add a 3Ware 9500S-8 RAID controller to a CentOS 5.4 box. 

I have the drivers from 3Ware and they seem to be a .ko file (which I presume 
is like a .kext on OSX)

How do I install these? Searched turn up people talking about Kernel panics 
with .ko's but I dont see anything that points to to installing one so I can 
use the card. 

Best,
-Jason
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

[Les Mikesell]

Did you miss the part where I said to set up yum to use the EPEL repository?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#How_can_I_install_the_packages_from_the_EPEL_software_repository.3F
You might want to look into other 3rd party repositories, but EPEL is the place 
to start for additional software and the least likely to have conflicts with 
the 
base install.



cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> Hello les ;
> login as: root
> 
> [r...@vpn ~]# yum install openvpn
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
> Determining fastest mirrors
>  * addons: ftp.plusline.de 
>  * base: ftp.plusline.de 
>  * extras: ftp.plusline.de 
>  * updates: ftp.plusline.de 
> addons   |  951 B 00:00
> addons/primary   |  203 B 00:00
> base | 2.1 kB 00:00
> base/primary_db  | 2.0 MB 00:00
> extras   | 2.1 kB 00:00
> extras/primary_db| 206 kB 00:00
> updates  | 1.9 kB 00:00
> updates/primary_db   | 760 kB 00:00
> Setting up Install Process
> No package openvpn available.
> Nothing to do
> [r...@vpn ~]#
> 
> 
> 2010/4/10 Les Mikesell  >
> 
> cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
>  > still the same :(
>  >
>  > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
>  >
>  > hata: Failed build dependencies:
>  >
>  > pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64
>  >
>  > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# dir
>  >
>  > =
>  > lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.i386.rpm pkcs11-helper-1.06.tar.bz2.1
>  >
>  > libopenssl-devel-0.9.8k-3.4_3.7.1.x86_64.delta.rpm
>  > lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.i386.rpm.1   pkcs11-helper-1.06.tgz
>  >
>  > libopenssl-devel-0.9.8m-1.2.i586.rpm
>  > lzo-devel-2.02-3.el5.kb.x86_64.rpm.html
>  pkcs11-helper-1.07-5.3.src.rpm
>  >
>  > lzo-1.08-4.2.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm
>  > minilzo-2.03.tar.gz  pkcs11-helper-1.07.tar.bz2
>  >
>  > lzo-1.08-4.rf.src.rpm
>  > openssl-1.0.0.tar.gz
>  > pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm
>  >
>  > lzo-devel-1.08-2.el4.i386.rpm
>  > openvpn-2.1.1rpm-3.0.6-4.i386.rpm
>  >
>  > lzo-devel-1.08-4.1.el3.rf.i386.rpm
>  openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz
>  >
>  > lzo-devel-1.08-4.2.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm
>  > pkcs11-helper-1.06.tar.bz2
>  >
>  > i think
> 
> What are you trying to accomplish here?  It looks like you are
> mixing a horrible
> mess of rpms from different repositories and source tarballs.  If
> you just want
> openvpn, set up yum to use the EPEL repository,
> yum install openvpn
> and you are done.  Generally speaking, you can use yum with one (and
> only one)
> 3rd party repository without a lot of trouble and it will take care
> of all
> dependencies.  If you start mixing things from different 3rd party
> repos you
> will run into many dependency problems but it is still usually
> easier to work
> around them than to build source tarballs and keep them up to date
> yourself.
> 
> --
>   Les Mikesell
>lesmikes...@gmail.com 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org 
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Installing a .ko file?

[Gordon McLellan]

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Slack-Moehrle
 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to add a 3Ware 9500S-8 RAID controller to a CentOS 5.4 box.
>
> I have the drivers from 3Ware and they seem to be a .ko file (which I presume 
> is like a .kext on OSX)
>
> How do I install these? Searched turn up people talking about Kernel panics 
> with .ko's but I dont see anything that points to to installing one so I can 
> use the card.

The driver should have come with an installer script, that copies the
module to the correct directory your runtime kernel is using for
modules.  If the driver download is nothing but a .ko file, do you
know what kernel it was complied for?  try sticking it in
/lib/modules/$YOUR_KERNEL_VERSION/extra and then do a depmod -a to
update the modules list, and lastly a modprobe to load your module.

Gordon
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Installing a .ko file?

[Daniel Bird]

On 10/04/2010 22:59, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to add a 3Ware 9500S-8 RAID controller to a CentOS 5.4 box. 
>   
FYI
http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=14546

D

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ulimit

[Miguel Medalha]

> I need to to change the ulimit to 16384(ulimit -n 16384) on boot on
> Centos 5.4 64 bit.  How do I do that?  Been searching and have yet to
> find a good answer.  Tried to do it in rc.local but it appears to
> happen to late there

In order to make the change permanent, add the following line to 
"/etc/security/limits.conf":

* - nofile 16384

 From "limits.conf"'s header:

«Quote:

- the wildcard *, for default entry
- nofile - max number of open files

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Benjamin Franz]

James Bensley wrote:
> What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
> it times out?
>   
It isn't from Mike. It is some spambot using his forged mail ID to post 
to the list. It is a common trick to by-pass member's only posting filters.

-- 
Benjamin Franz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Installing a .ko file?

[Benjamin Franz]

Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to add a 3Ware 9500S-8 RAID controller to a CentOS 5.4 box. 
>
> I have the drivers from 3Ware and they seem to be a .ko file (which I presume 
> is like a .kext on OSX)
>
> How do I install these? Searched turn up people talking about Kernel panics 
> with .ko's but I dont see anything that points to to installing one so I can 
> use the card. 
>   

Have you tried it without installing the vendor driver? That board 
should be old enough to be supported natively. I use 9550SX boards 
without any problems.

-- 
Benjamin Franz


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ulimit [SOLVED]

[Miguel Medalha]

> I need to to change the ulimit to 16384(ulimit -n 16384) on boot on
> Centos 5.4 64 bit.  How do I do that?

After replying to you, I tested the "solution" I gave you and it didn't 
work.

I found a working solution. I added the following line to /etc/profile:

ulimit -n 16384

This works as the general default setting. If you want to apply the 
setting to a particular user, you should add it to the .bash_profile 
file in the user's home directory.

I know it works because I just tested it and it survived the server's 
reboot. I ran "ulimit -a" and the new value was there.

Please excuse me for the involuntary mislead. I was pretty sure that it 
did work "once upon a time"...

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ulimit [SOLVED]

[Keith Keller]

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 03:25:47AM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> 
> > I need to to change the ulimit to 16384(ulimit -n 16384) on boot on
> > Centos 5.4 64 bit.  How do I do that?
> 
> After replying to you, I tested the "solution" I gave you and it didn't 
> work.
> 
> I found a working solution. I added the following line to /etc/profile:
> 
> ulimit -n 16384

It's not clear from the OP's original post whether this will work for
his purposes or not.  My guess (which I can't substantiate, since I
don't have a box which I can reboot to test) is that the entry in
/etc/profile may not be applied to the init scripts, so (for example) if
he wanted httpd limited the /etc/profile entry may not be sufficient.

Matt, perhaps you could provide more details, on which processes you
desire to have this ulimit, and why.  The more specific you can get the
better quality answers you'll receive.

> I know it works because I just tested it and it survived the server's 
> reboot. I ran "ulimit -a" and the new value was there.

...from a login shell.  If you don't have a login shell /etc/profile
isn't read on bash startup.

--keith

-- 
kkel...@speakeasy.net



pgpm8C4RQ2sJd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[aurfalien]

You can actually rent these bots so that ppl can click on your link,  
and you as the referrer get paid.

Getting several hundred thousand click thru's is a conservative number.

I'm sure this will hit some of the other lists I'm on and is claiming  
to be some online Canadian pharmacy (MyCanadianPharmacy) selling  
viagra, cialis, etc...

- aurf
On Apr 10, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:

> James Bensley wrote:
>> What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
>> it times out?
>>
> It isn't from Mike. It is some spambot using his forged mail ID to  
> post
> to the list. It is a common trick to by-pass member's only posting  
> filters.
>
> -- 
> Benjamin Franz
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos