[CentOS] query on backup

[Mail Administrator]

Dear All,

I have a centOS 5 server running DNS and Mailserver
also i do hav Squirrel Mail running which the users use as webmail
i have about 200 users

Now i would like to have a total disaster recovery
example. if the machine fails
i could install centOS on another machine and restore the user accounts n
information and the mails with the user preferences

wht could be the easiest way to acheive this..

i dont have a tape backup unit

apprecite your advice n help

Regards


simon


if the system fails i could install another




-- 
Network ADMIN:

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] query on backup

[Frank Cox]

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:42:30 +0300 (AST)
Mail Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> wht could be the easiest way to acheive this..

http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Plotter?

[Fajar Priyanto]

Hello all,
How do we install a plotter in Centos5? Is it regarded as ordinary printer?
It's using an Ikon Corporation card to connect at PCI. The driver for the card 
(IHCP) is successfully compiled and installed.
Any hints are really appreciated.
Thank you.
-- 
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial 
http://linux2.arinet.org
15:05:17 up 6:43, 2.6.22-14-generic GNU/Linux 
Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org
The real challenge of teaching is getting your students motivated to learn.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Scheduled works...

[Tolun ARDAHANLI]

Hi guys;

Is there any structure/program for scheduled works in Centos 5.1?(I want to
empty my /tmp folder at decided hours...How can I do that?)

Thanks a lot...



-- 
Tolun ARDAHANLI
Bilgisayar Muhendisi
E-posta:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Icq:326600



Tolun ARDAHANLI
Computer Engineer
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Icq:326600
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Server to server communication

[John R Pierce]

D Steward wrote:

On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 07:41 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
  
you can pass 1K of info on a URL as arguments to a http 'page' which 
invokes your program in whatever web-language its written in.



Well, the data is rather sensitive - authentication tokens, IPs and
possibly cookies and/or password hashes, so doing a POST is more prudent
than putting it in the URL.
I forgot about the possibility of invoking an app or script via use of
PHP so thanks for giving me a hint.
  


you realize POST data is virtually the same as GET data in an http 
request?  if you use https, then its all encrypted. 

re: invoking an app by php...  if you're talking about php on the 
'server' side, just use cgi-bin the old fashion way and your code is 
invoked directly.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Info about the NIC

[Tronn Wærdahl]

If you do a ifconfig eth0 you get some info about the eth0 nic

eth0Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:02:B3:63:EF:43
  inet addr:x.x.x.x Bcast:x.x.x.x  Mask:x.x.x.x
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1166 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:268 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
  RX bytes:104255 (101.8 Kb)  TX bytes:19936 (19.4 Kb)
  Interrupt:5 Base address:0x2000


I wounder about RX bytes and TX bytes, what does it mean, how does it
collect its data
How often does it zero the counters, every boot, hour or somethings else?.
Is the information reliable



Thanks

Tronn
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Info about the NIC

[Anne Wilson]

On Wednesday 19 March 2008 08:37:21 Tronn Wærdahl wrote:
> If you do a ifconfig eth0 you get some info about the eth0 nic
>
> eth0Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:02:B3:63:EF:43
>   inet addr:x.x.x.x Bcast:x.x.x.x  Mask:x.x.x.x
>   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>   RX packets:1166 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>   TX packets:268 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>   collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>   RX bytes:104255 (101.8 Kb)  TX bytes:19936 (19.4 Kb)
>   Interrupt:5 Base address:0x2000
>
>
> I wounder about RX bytes and TX bytes, what does it mean, how does it
> collect its data

RX= received, TX = transmitted.

> How often does it zero the counters, every boot, hour or somethings else?.
> Is the information reliable
>
As far as I know, it zeros on boot.  And yes, it is reliable.  
However, 'transmitted' will include checksums etc., so won't match exactly to 
a file length.  Not an expert explanation, but adequate, I think :-)

Anne



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Server to server communication

[Jim Wildman]

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, D Steward wrote:


It looks to me like OpenAMQ will be the ultimate solution
I'm amazed that RedHat with a finger in almost every opensource pie
hasn't backed this or come out with their own competing option, since it
appears to tie in very nicely with clusters.


Read closer, RH is involved.  It is being (or has been) integrated into
the JBoss suite(s).


Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE   [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rossberry.com
"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best
state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one."
Thomas Paine
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Submission problem.....

[niranjan]

My attachments are not being attached properly as they are not being probed by 
the catalog system as "test results",whenever i do my certification submissions.

For this reason each attachment have to be re-attached.

Please help



Zenith wins FICCI Corporate Excellence award from Prime Minister





The Federation of India Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) award is a testament to the outstanding contributions made by a corporate in enhancing customer responsiveness and initiating innovative product/service quality.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Submission problem.....

[Jim Perrin]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:23 AM, niranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> My attachments are not being attached properly as they are not being probed
> by the catalog system as "test results",whenever i do my certification
> submissions.
>
> For this reason each attachment have to be re-attached.
>
> Please help

Help with what exactly? I don't see a single error log or reference to
a centos application here.
What attachments? What catalog system? what are you using to attach
them.  What certification submission?


-- 
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Scheduled works...

[gopinath]

use crontab utility

  - Original Message - 
  From: Tolun ARDAHANLI 
  To: CentOS mailing list 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:43 PM
  Subject: [CentOS] Scheduled works...


  Hi guys;

  Is there any structure/program for scheduled works in Centos 5.1?(I want to 
empty my /tmp folder at decided hours...How can I do that?) 

  Thanks a lot...



  -- 
  Tolun ARDAHANLI
  Bilgisayar Muhendisi
  E-posta:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Icq:326600

  

  Tolun ARDAHANLI
  Computer Engineer
  E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Icq:326600 


--


  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Server to server communication

[Michael Simpson]

On 3/19/08, Jim Wildman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, D Steward wrote:
>
> > It looks to me like OpenAMQ will be the ultimate solution
> > I'm amazed that RedHat with a finger in almost every opensource pie
> > hasn't backed this or come out with their own competing option, since it
> > appears to tie in very nicely with clusters.
>
> Read closer, RH is involved.  It is being (or has been) integrated into
> the JBoss suite(s).
>

more info here about AMQP in Redhat



mike
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by Centos 5.1 installation?

[John Bowden]

On Tuesday 18 March 2008 06:21:43 Yu-Hui Jin wrote:
> Hi, Jason,
>
> Thanks and I tried the first method to start with the parameter, but it was
> extremely slow loading each screen. one time I got to the testing media
> page and i chose Test. and it seemed stuck there for ever so I forced
> shutdown my box.

That's because you are using the drive in IDE mode with a general work 
with "most controllers driver". Might be worth giving it time to finish the 
installation and let CentOS go online and find the correct driver.

>
> I also tried to download and install the AHCI driver following this
> article:
>
> http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30865
>

Not on line at the moment so can't follow the link at the moment

> But the installation failed; it said The computer does not meet the minimum
> requirements for installing this software.

Sounds like the installation is not finding the correct controller chip, is it 
the correct driver?

>
> It seemed that no trick has worked yet... any new suggestion or advice?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Hui
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > boot with
> >
> > linux all-generic-ide
> >
> > or try to change your bios sata emulation to ahci
> >
> > Yu-Hui Jin wrote:
> > > Hi, there,
> > >
> > > I tried to install Centos 5.1 on a Dell Inspiron 530 box I just bought,
> > > but failed due to invalid drive. The installation did not recognize
> > > either the DVD nor the hard disk.  Joseph from the community said it is
> > > likely that Centos can't recognize the controller -- Intel SATA
> > > controller (cmiiw).
> > >
> > > Did anyone solve this problem before?  How did you do it?
> > >
> > > Here's the related configuration for my box:
> > > Inspiron 530 Intel Core2 processor Q6600 (2.40Ghz 1066FSB) w/Quad Core
> > > Technology and 8MB cache
> > > SATA 0: Samsung HD501LJ(500GB Serial ATA II Hard Drive(7200RPM))
> > > SATA 1: PDBS DVD +/- RW DH-16W1S   (16X DVD+/-RW Drive)
> > >
> > >
> > > Many thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > -Hui
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > >-
> > >
> > > ___
> > > CentOS mailing list
> > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Was there an operating system (M$?) on the machine before you tried to upgrade 
the O/S to CentOS and if so did the controller have access to both drives? 
What is the controller that the drives are connected to?
Regards John

-- 
Guy Fawkes, the only man to enter the house's of Parliament
with honest intentions, (he was going to blow them up!)
Registered Linux user number 414240
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 37, Issue 7

[centos-announce-request]

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2008:0181 Critical CentOS 3 i386 krb5 -  security update
  (Tru Huynh)
   2. CESA-2008:0181 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 krb5 -security
  update (Tru Huynh)
   3. CESA-2008:0196 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 unzip - security update
  (Tru Huynh)
   4. CESA-2008:0196 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 unzip -   security
  update (Tru Huynh)
   5. CESA-2008:0131-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 netpbm  security
  update (John Newbigin)
   6. CESA-2008:0181-01: Critical CentOS 2 i386 krb5security
  update (John Newbigin)
   7. CESA-2008:0196-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 unzip   security
  update (John Newbigin)
   8. CESA-2008:0185-05: Low CentOS 2 i386 tzdata   enhancement
  update (John Newbigin)
   9. CEBA-2008:0128 CentOS 5 i386  device-mapper-multipath Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
  10. CEBA-2008:0128 CentOS 5 x86_64device-mapper-multipath Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
  11. CESA-2008:0042 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 tomcat  Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
  12. CESA-2008:0042 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 tomcatUpdate
  (Karanbir Singh)
  13. CESA-2008:0164 Critical CentOS 5 i386 krb5 Update (Karanbir Singh)
  14. CESA-2008:0164 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 krb5  Update
  (Karanbir Singh)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:48:28 +0100
From: Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0181 Critical CentOS 3 i386 krb5
-   security update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0181

krb5 security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0181.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:

i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.2.7-68.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-libs-1.2.7-68.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-server-1.2.7-68.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-workstation-1.2.7-68.i386.rpm

source:
updates/SRPMS/krb5-1.2.7-68.src.rpm

You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command:

yum update krb5\*

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080318/ace63595/attachment-0001.bin

--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:49:04 +0100
From: Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0181 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64
krb5 -  security update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0181

krb5 security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0181.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:

x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.2.7-68.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/krb5-libs-1.2.7-68.i386.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/krb5-libs-1.2.7-68.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/krb5-server-1.2.7-68.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/krb5-workstation-1.2.7-68.x86_64.rpm

source:
updates/SRPMS/krb5-1.2.7-68.src.rpm

You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command:

yum update krb5\*

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080318/48b70b65/attachment-0001.bin

--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:50:20 +0100
From: Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0196 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 unzip
-   security update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0196

unzip security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0196.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to

Re: [CentOS] Scheduled works...

[Simon Jolle]

2008/3/19, Tolun ARDAHANLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi guys;

Hi Tolun

> Is there any structure/program for scheduled works in Centos 5.1?(I want to
> empty my /tmp folder at decided hours...How can I do that?)

Use crontab for custom scripts.

You maybe also look at tmpwatch (removes files which haven't been
accessed for a period of time) - /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch

cheers
Simon

-- 
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Centos 5.1

[Tom Browder]

I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).

Question:  I have the 5.0 CD-ROMs, so can I install with them and them
update to 5.1 via the internet, or should I use the 5.1 CDs?

Thanks.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1

[Tim Verhoeven]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Tom Browder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).
>
>  Question:  I have the 5.0 CD-ROMs, so can I install with them and them
>  update to 5.1 via the internet, or should I use the 5.1 CDs?

You can do both, install 5.0 with the CDROM and do a online update to
5.1. Or download the 5.1 cd's and use those.

If you already have the 5.0 cdroms then it is probably best to do a
minimal install with 5.0 then upgrade to 5.1 and then use yum to
install the actual stuff you need.

Regards,
Tim

-- 
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83

Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] what is this address meaning?

[ann kok]

Hi

I read the eth1 and have this ip address
it is automatically assigned from system

inet addr:0.0.0.6  Bcast:255.255.255.255

What is this address meaning?




eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr
00:1B:21:07:A5:94  
  inet addr:0.0.0.6  Bcast:255.255.255.255 
Mask:0.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::21b:21ff:fe07:a594/64
Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500 
Metric:1
  RX packets:3944052 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:4959117 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
  RX bytes:2610056956 (2.4 GiB)  TX
bytes:4864161519 (4.5 GiB)
  Base address:0xec00 Memory:fdc0-fdc2 


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] what is this address meaning?

[Warren Young]

ann kok wrote:


inet addr:0.0.0.6  Bcast:255.255.255.255

What is this address meaning?


It means something's misconfigured.  Can you post the contents of 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 ?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] what is this address meaning?

[ann kok]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] network-scripts]# more ifcfg-eth1
# Intel Corporation 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet
Controller
DEVICE=eth1
HWADDR=00:1B:21:07:A5:94
ONBOOT=yes
# BOOTPROTO=dhcp
TYPE=Ethernet
# BOOTPROTO=dhcp

--- Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ann kok wrote:
> > 
> > inet addr:0.0.0.6  Bcast:255.255.255.255
> > 
> > What is this address meaning?
> 
> It means something's misconfigured.  Can you post
> the contents of 
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 ?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] what is this address meaning?

[Warren Young]

ann kok wrote:

DEVICE=eth1
HWADDR=00:1B:21:07:A5:94
ONBOOT=yes
# BOOTPROTO=dhcp
TYPE=Ethernet
# BOOTPROTO=dhcp


Nowhere in here do you give the device a way to get an IP address. 
You've turned off DHCP, but don't give a static address, so I guess it's 
just picking a random value from somewhere.


Say something like this:

DEVICE=eth1
HWADDR=00:1B:21:07:A5:94
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=1.2.3.4
NETMASK=255.255.255.0

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] remote command execution

[Joseph L. Casale]

> Can you give an actual example of something that fails?
>
> --
>Les Mikesell

Les, it's not that it fails it is just that plink sends the command and waits 
for it to complete execution. Even if the shell script uses your nohup syntax, 
if I put in a long dd as a test command then have plink execute the script, it 
will actually wait for it to complete and even show dd's output! Sending the 
command to at worked perfectly!

jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1

[leonel]

Tom Browder wrote:

I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).

Question:  I have the 5.0 CD-ROMs, so can I install with them and them
update to 5.1 via the internet, or should I use the 5.1 CDs?

Thanks.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


  



Install the minimal  with the  next  yum update you will have   5.1


Leonel

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by Centos5.1 installation?

[Scott Silva]

on 3-18-2008 10:51 PM Yu-Hui Jin spake the following:


Here ya go
5 minutes
 
http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=sw_linux&message.id=12701&query.id=104245#M12701





Thanks!   I tried network installation (using HTTP though), but the 
harddisk can't be recognized during the partitioning step.  It seems to 
me this NFS network described in this article would have the same problem.


am I wrong in thinking this way? (i don't have a second linux to do the 
NFS install so I'm suspicious about whether i should really give this a 
try.)


It seems installing AHCI is the only way to go to me


Look at the link again. You don't install AHCI, it is an option in your bios 
to change the sata emulation mode. Again, you don't install AHCI.


--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by Centos 5.1 installation?

[Scott Silva]

on 3-18-2008 10:47 PM Yu-Hui Jin spake the following:

I was told to try two methods:
1)  linxu all-generic-ide
2)  install ahci  and config to use it in BIOS.

#1 is too slow;  #2,  I checked my BIOS, there's no ahci option.   
That's why i'm following the article which tells how to install it for 
XP and get it into BIOS.


Installing a driver in XP will not get anything into your bios, and won't help 
you install Linux.


--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by Centos 5.1 installation?

[bruce]

hey scott...

are you sure about the installation of windows drivers, not affecting the 
installation of linux. aren't there a number of cases where in order to install 
hardware on linux, you 1st need the windows drivers?

might it be possible that the article/advice the poster was following was with 
regards to obtaining drivers for the sata controller/drive to be used under 
linux??

peace

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Scott Silva
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 6:55 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by
Centos 5.1 installation?


on 3-18-2008 10:47 PM Yu-Hui Jin spake the following:
> I was told to try two methods:
> 1)  linxu all-generic-ide
> 2)  install ahci  and config to use it in BIOS.
> 
> #1 is too slow;  #2,  I checked my BIOS, there's no ahci option.   
> That's why i'm following the article which tells how to install it for 
> XP and get it into BIOS.
> 
Installing a driver in XP will not get anything into your bios, and won't help 
you install Linux.

-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by Centos 5.1 installation?

[Michael Simpson]

On 3/19/08, bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey scott...
>
> are you sure about the installation of windows drivers, not affecting the 
> installation of linux. aren't there a number of cases where in order to 
> install hardware on linux, you 1st need the windows drivers?
>
> might it be possible that the article/advice the poster was following was 
> with regards to obtaining drivers for the sata controller/drive to be used 
> under linux??

Hi there

The only example of anything approaching this that i know of is using
ndiswrapper to install the windows driver for a wifi card on a linux
box and after 2.6.25 it looks like you will taint the kernel by doing
this.

Using windows drivers within linux is an ugly hack at best.

mike
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized byCentos5.1 installation?

[Dennis McLeod]

I don't know what your reply means.
 
Here is what it says to do:
 
 
"I went back and looked at the BIOS again and noted a setting under
"Integrated Peripherals" for "SATA Mode" with the options of "IDE" or
"RAID". Since the ata_piix module seemed to be the one at issue I turned on
"RAID" to see what would happen and it switched to loading the achi module
instead of the ata_piix."

 
Do you know how to get into the bios?
Can you change it as described above? (from IDE to RAID)
 
Dennis
 
 
 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Yu-Hui Jin
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized
byCentos5.1 installation?




Here ya go
5 minutes
 
http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=sw_linux

&message.id=12701&query.id=104245#M12701



Thanks!   I tried network installation (using HTTP though), but the harddisk
can't be recognized during the partitioning step.  It seems to me this NFS
network described in this article would have the same problem. 

am I wrong in thinking this way? (i don't have a second linux to do the NFS
install so I'm suspicious about whether i should really give this a try.)

It seems installing AHCI is the only way to go to me


-Hui



 


-Hui


On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Yu-Hui Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi, Jason,

Thanks and I tried the first method to start with the parameter, but it was
extremely slow loading each screen. one time I got to the testing media page
and i chose Test. and it seemed stuck there for ever so I forced shutdown my
box.

I also tried to download and install the AHCI driver following this article:

http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30865

But the installation failed; it said The computer does not meet the minimum
requirements for installing this software. 

It seemed that no trick has worked yet... any new suggestion or advice? 


Thanks,

-Hui 

 



On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


boot with

linux all-generic-ide

or try to change your bios sata emulation to ahci


Yu-Hui Jin wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> I tried to install Centos 5.1 on a Dell Inspiron 530 box I just bought,
> but failed due to invalid drive. The installation did not recognize
> either the DVD nor the hard disk.  Joseph from the community said it is
> likely that Centos can't recognize the controller -- Intel SATA
> controller (cmiiw).
>
> Did anyone solve this problem before?  How did you do it?
>
> Here's the related configuration for my box:
> Inspiron 530 Intel Core2 processor Q6600 (2.40Ghz 1066FSB) w/Quad Core
> Technology and 8MB cache
> SATA 0: Samsung HD501LJ(500GB Serial ATA II Hard Drive(7200RPM))
> SATA 1: PDBS DVD +/- RW DH-16W1S   (16X DVD+/-RW Drive)
>
>
> Many thanks!
>
>
> regards,
> -Hui
>
>

> 
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





-- 
Regards,

-Hui 




-- 
Regards,

-Hui 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos






-- 
Regards,

-Hui 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by Centos 5.1 installation?

[Scott Silva]

on 3-19-2008 8:34 AM bruce spake the following:

hey scott...

are you sure about the installation of windows drivers, not affecting

the installation of linux. aren't there a number of cases where in order to
install hardware on linux, you 1st need the windows drivers?


might it be possible that the article/advice the poster was following was with
regards to obtaining drivers for the sata controller/drive to be used under 
linux??


Anything is possible, but I actually did read the article, so that doesn't 
apply here. It was to get an AHCI driver for XP on a certain asus MB for speed 
reasons.
I try to not talk out of my behind unless I happen to get into the bourbon 
first, but that is also not the case here.
And needing to download a windows driver for some kind of emulation like 
ndiswrapper doesn't mean you need to install it in windows, or even have a 
copy of windows.


--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by Centos 5.1 installation?

[bruce]

bourbon can be good... xmas cooking!!
although.. rum cakes aren't bad either...


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Scott Silva
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:52 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by
Centos 5.1 installation?


on 3-19-2008 8:34 AM bruce spake the following:
> hey scott...
> 
> are you sure about the installation of windows drivers, not affecting
the installation of linux. aren't there a number of cases where in order to
install hardware on linux, you 1st need the windows drivers?
> 
> might it be possible that the article/advice the poster was following was with
regards to obtaining drivers for the sata controller/drive to be used under 
linux??
> 
Anything is possible, but I actually did read the article, so that doesn't 
apply here. It was to get an AHCI driver for XP on a certain asus MB for speed 
reasons.
I try to not talk out of my behind unless I happen to get into the bourbon 
first, but that is also not the case here.
And needing to download a windows driver for some kind of emulation like 
ndiswrapper doesn't mean you need to install it in windows, or even have a 
copy of windows.

-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] How to prevent installer using disk labels?

[Tony Mountifield]

Is there any way, when installing CentOS (or any RH-based distro),
to prevent it from using disk labels in /etc/fstab and /boot/grub/grub.conf,
and to force it to just use the actual device names?

For testing purposes, I am installing two different CentOS versions in
different partitions, and am having to change from labels to device names
by hand, and re-label the disks, in order to avoid the boot process getting
confused between the filesystems.

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Scheduled works...

[John R Pierce]

Tolun ARDAHANLI wrote:

Hi guys;

Is there any structure/program for scheduled works in Centos 5.1?(I 
want to empty my /tmp folder at decided hours...How can I do that?)


you should be aware, there are files in /tmp with long time persistence, 
the only stuff thats absolutely safe to delete is files from before the 
last reboot.   For instance, each SSH session opened to a server creates 
a directory in /tmp, this is needed as long as that session is in use.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Way to not page swap programs

[Jerry Geis]

Is there a way to tell linux "dont ever swap out my program"...

Like perhaps a list of programs (some setup file)  that if any program 
in my file listing is running dont

consider the program when looking for something to swap out?

Does anything like that exist?

Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Way to not page swap programs

[William Warren]

you can set vm.swappiness=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf that will do just about 
that.  if your programs get a leak though you really do want the system 
to be able to swap or OOM might nuke them anyway. If you are really 
concerned about this make sure you have plenty of ram in the machine and 
set swappiness to zero.


Others may have other tweaks suggestions..:)

Jerry Geis wrote:

Is there a way to tell linux "dont ever swap out my program"...

Like perhaps a list of programs (some setup file)  that if any program 
in my file listing is running dont

consider the program when looking for something to swap out?

Does anything like that exist?

Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



--
Registered Microsoft Partner

My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] remote command execution

[Les Mikesell]

Joseph L. Casale wrote:

Can you give an actual example of something that fails?

--


Les, it's not that it fails it is just that plink sends the command and waits 
for it to complete execution. Even if the shell script uses your nohup syntax, 
if I put in a long dd as a test command then have plink execute the script, it 
will actually wait for it to complete and even show dd's output! Sending the 
command to at worked perfectly!


That means you left one or all of the remote shell's stdin/out/error 
connected (not surprising, since the example earlier only redirected a 
subshell) and the ssh connection is waiting for them to close.  Try 
running the nohup as part of the actual command line - and you may need 
to add an 
exec output_file 2>error_file
and exit.  Check the man page for 'nohup'.  It will redirect sdtout and 
error if you don't, but I've forgotten if it does anything with stdin.


--
  Les Mikesell
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1

[Tom Browder]

> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Tom Browder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).
...
> If you already have the 5.0 cdroms then it is probably best to do a
> minimal install with 5.0 then upgrade to 5.1 and then use yum to
> install the actual stuff you need.

Great, Tim, many thanks.

Also thanks to Leonel.

-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Making a CentOS livecd bootable on a flash drive

[Joseph L. Casale]

I was following the guide at https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd/ to do 
this, and sure enough it claimed the partition wasn't bootable, so fdisk to 
toggle the flag bootable yet it still didn't boot. Any subtle nuance anyone 
might know to do this?

Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Server to server communication

[Karanbir Singh]

D Steward wrote:

Well, the data is rather sensitive - authentication tokens, IPs and
possibly cookies and/or password hashes, so doing a POST is more prudent
than putting it in the URL.


if someone is watching network traffic, POST and GET methods looks 
identical in terms of how much of data and how its visible.


--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Making a CentOS livecd bootable on a flash drive

[Patrice Guay]

Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I was following the guide at https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd/ to do 
> this, and sure enough it claimed the partition wasn't bootable, so fdisk to 
> toggle the flag bootable yet it still didn't boot. Any subtle nuance anyone 
> might know to do this?

Did you follow the steps outlined at:
https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd/wiki/ImageFlash

It includes instructions on how to mark your USB partition as bootable
using "parted".

--
Patrice
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] Making a CentOS livecd bootable on a flash drive

[Joseph L. Casale]

> Did you follow the steps outlined at:
> https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd/wiki/ImageFlash
>
> It includes instructions on how to mark your USB partition as bootable
> using "parted".
>

Well, I used fdisk assuming it was equivalent after reading that. I guess I can 
install and try parted, do you think it makes a difference?
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1

[Kuang-Chun Cheng]

Deps. on what kind of hardware you have.
CentOS 5.0 CD installer can not see my SATA harddisk.  So I use
CentOS 5.1 CD.   If you don't have the same problem I had, you
can do both.

KC

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Tom Browder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Tom Browder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).
>  ...
>  > If you already have the 5.0 cdroms then it is probably best to do a
>  > minimal install with 5.0 then upgrade to 5.1 and then use yum to
>  > install the actual stuff you need.
>
>  Great, Tim, many thanks.
>
>  Also thanks to Leonel.
>
>  -Tom
>  ___
>  CentOS mailing list
>  CentOS@centos.org
>  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Making a CentOS livecd bootable on a flash drive

[Patrice Guay]

Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Did you follow the steps outlined at:
>> https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd/wiki/ImageFlash
>>
>> It includes instructions on how to mark your USB partition as bootable
>> using "parted".
>>
>
> Well, I used fdisk assuming it was equivalent after reading that. I guess I 
> can install and try parted, do you think it makes a difference?
If you use parted and get it to work then I'll assume using fdisk
doesn't work the same as parted.
I didn't use fdisk when I encountered this problem previously.

--
Patrice
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS 5.1 - Postfix Mysql

[Tom Brown]

Hi

I am building a new box and i want to get away from hand rolled stuff 
this time and i need Postfix with MySQL support compiled in -


Is this available anywhere already built?

thanks

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 - Postfix Mysql

[Tim Verhoeven]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I am building a new box and i want to get away from hand rolled stuff
>  this time and i need Postfix with MySQL support compiled in -
>
>  Is this available anywhere already built?

You will find this in the centosplus repository
(http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories).

Regards,
Tim

-- 
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83

Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Incremental backups?

[Kenneth Porter]

On Friday, March 14, 2008 11:12 PM -0500 Les Mikesell 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



If you want something easier and can live with disk based backups instead
of tape, look at backuppc (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/).  I still
run amanda because I set it up about 10 years ago and never have to do
anything but change the tapes, but I take the tapes offsite and would
only restore from them after a disaster.  For day-to-day stuff it is much
easier to grab a copy or do a restore from the on-line web interface of
backuppc.


I combine this with dump to an external USB drive. I stop the BackupPC 
service during the dump to idle the system. If you use LVM, you could 
instead generate a filesystem snapshot and dump that. (I didn't know about 
the snapshot feature until I'd already installed CentOS 5 and it used the 
whole partition for the volume.)

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Move hard disk to a new machine

[Kenneth Porter]

On Saturday, March 15, 2008 3:41 PM -0400 "William L. Maltby" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Unless it is an LVM volume? OP didn't say much. If so, export the volume
first, then import it on the target machine.


For those of us not familiar with the details of LVM, what does the 
export/import do?


I was going to take the 300 GB PATA drive out of an old HP Vectra and move 
it to a newer box with more memory, and didn't realize I'd need to do this 
step.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to prevent installer using disk labels?

[Karanbir Singh]

Tony Mountifield wrote:

Is there any way, when installing CentOS (or any RH-based distro),
to prevent it from using disk labels in /etc/fstab and /boot/grub/grub.conf,
and to force it to just use the actual device names?


I dont think there is any sane way, in either the C4 or C5 installers. 
If you do find a way to do that, let me know.


There is presently a conversation going on with the anaconda developers 
about dropping labelling completely, but that might be a long time 
before we see that in EL / CentOS released distros



For testing purposes, I am installing two different CentOS versions in
different partitions, and am having to change from labels to device names
by hand, and re-label the disks, in order to avoid the boot process getting
confused between the filesystems.


you could always just change fstab, perhaps a sneaky script in %post of 
the kickstart to do the hard work for you ?


--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] which open source wiki CMS?

[Kenneth Porter]

On Monday, March 17, 2008 11:57 AM +0100 Simon Jolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:



Which mailing list is appropriate for this kind question? IMHO there
is no general (not project specific) CMS list


Since you're insistent on PHP, try comp.lang.php. There's also the 
comp.infosystems.www hierarchy.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] mail_always fails in CentOS 5

[Eric DuToit]

I'm using the same sudoers file for all hosts.  Out of 35 hosts, 14 are CentOS 
5, the rest are CentOS 4.  There are mixtures of MTA's on both platforms but 
the behavior is consistent.  Here is the snip of my sudoers:

Defaults mail_always
Defaults mailto="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Works fine in CentOS 4, doesn't even produce a blip in the maillog in CentOS 5 
on all servers.  Outbound mail tested and working on all boxes.

Does anyone else see this behavior?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by Centos 5.1 installation?

[Yu-Hui Jin]

Hi, guys,

I finally found I only need to choose the "RAID" option for SATA mode (the
other one is "IDE").  I didn't know by choosing it, Centos is able to load
the ahci driver.  That solves the problem.  It took ton of time for me to
figuring out the solution is such easy.  I should've tried this earlier.

Thank you all for helping on this.  Centos seems to have a great community.


regards,

-Hui


On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:24 AM, bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> bourbon can be good... xmas cooking!!
> although.. rum cakes aren't bad either...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Scott Silva
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:52 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Re: Intel SATA controller (cmiiw) not recognized by
> Centos 5.1 installation?
>
>
> on 3-19-2008 8:34 AM bruce spake the following:
> > hey scott...
> >
> > are you sure about the installation of windows drivers, not affecting
> the installation of linux. aren't there a number of cases where in order
> to
> install hardware on linux, you 1st need the windows drivers?
> >
> > might it be possible that the article/advice the poster was following
> was with
> regards to obtaining drivers for the sata controller/drive to be used
> under
> linux??
> >
> Anything is possible, but I actually did read the article, so that doesn't
> apply here. It was to get an AHCI driver for XP on a certain asus MB for
> speed
> reasons.
> I try to not talk out of my behind unless I happen to get into the bourbon
> first, but that is also not the case here.
> And needing to download a windows driver for some kind of emulation like
> ndiswrapper doesn't mean you need to install it in windows, or even have a
> copy of windows.
>
> --
> MailScanner is like deodorant...
> You hope everybody uses it, and
> you notice quickly if they don't
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
Regards,

-Hui
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos