bug#63456: [PATCH] gnu: mesa-opencl: Remove reference to patch

2023-05-14 Thread Guillaume Le Vaillant
Patch pushed as 930e6e3e7a1c5f83aedb49f6fa0ebb0e0bdeeef3.
Thanks.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


bug#63451: Guix pull not successful

2023-05-14 Thread Csepp


a  writes:

> first, i i ran guix pull and this happened. 
> i don't see anything in my kernel logs around this time
>
> λ ~ guix pull 
>[1259]
> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 
> 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...
> Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d6f6b57 (667 new commits)...
> Building from this channel:
>   guix  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git   d6f6b57
> substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
> substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 
> 100.0%
> building 
> /gnu/store/kxhxsxmann4jv6z62z0ssh011sahk88k-compute-guix-derivation.drv...
> Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... /warning: 
> 'texlive-latex-tools' is deprecated, use 'texlive-tools' instead
> warning: 'texlive-latex-graphics' is deprecated, use 'texlive-graphics' 
> instead
> warning: 'texlive-generic-etexcmds' is deprecated, use 'texlive-etexcmds' 
> instead
> warning: 'texlive-generic-infwarerr' is deprecated, use 'texlive-infwarerr' 
> instead
> warning: 'texlive-latex-graphics' is deprecated, use 'texlive-graphics' 
> instead
> warning: 'texlive-latex-graphics' is deprecated, use 'texlive-graphics' 
> instead
> warning: 'texlive-generic-atbegshi' is deprecated, use 'texlive-atbegshi' 
> instead
> warning: 'texlive-latex-atveryend' is deprecated, use 'texlive-atveryend' 
> instead
> \Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>222:29 19 (map1 (# (#) #) 
> # ?))
>222:29 18 (map1 (# (#) #) 
> (# ()))> # ?))
>222:17 17 (map1 (# 
> (# ?))
> In ice-9/psyntax.scm:
> Exception thrown while printing backtrace:
> Wrong type to apply: 129
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:3165:6: In procedure module-gensym:
> Invalid read access of chars of wide string: "m-1bcbf699e1749862-28a08"

This looks very weird, could you run a disk check and a guix store check
just to be safe?





bug#63498: mingetty man page is not installed .

2023-05-14 Thread aprekates

In ver 1.08 the man page is not installed.





bug#63507: [mumi] /recent causes crash

2023-05-14 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Visiting issues.guix.gnu.org/recent leads to this crash:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
2023-05-14 23:11:35 GET /recent
2023-05-14 23:11:35 In mumi/web/server.scm:
2023-05-14 23:11:35  35:9 95 (handler _ _)
2023-05-14 23:11:35 In mumi/web/controller.scm:
2023-05-14 23:11:35 66:19 94 (_ _)
2023-05-14 23:11:35 In mumi/web/view/html.scm:
2023-05-14 23:11:35779:10 93 (list-of-recent-issues _)
2023-05-14 23:11:35 In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 92 (map1 (#< num: 63506 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 91 (map1 (#< num: 63505 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 90 (map1 (#< num: 63504 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 89 (map1 (#< num: 63503 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 88 (map1 (#< num: 63502 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 87 (map1 (#< num: 63501 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 86 (map1 (#< num: 63500 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 85 (map1 (#< num: 63499 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 84 (map1 (#< num: 63498 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 83 (map1 (#< num: 63494 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 82 (map1 (#< num: 63491 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 81 (map1 (#< num: 63490 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 80 (map1 (#< num: 63489 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 79 (map1 (#< num: 63488 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 78 (map1 (#< num: 63486 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 77 (map1 (#< num: 63485 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 76 (map1 (#< num: 63483 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 75 (map1 (#< num: 63482 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 74 (map1 (#< num: 63479 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 73 (map1 (#< num: 63478 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 72 (map1 (#< num: 63477 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 71 (map1 (#< num: 63476 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 70 (map1 (#< num: 63475 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 69 (map1 (#< num: 63474 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 68 (map1 (#< num: 63473 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 67 (map1 (#< num: 63471 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 66 (map1 (#< num: 63468 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 65 (map1 (#< num: 63467 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 64 (map1 (#< num: 63466 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 63 (map1 (#< num: 63465 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 62 (map1 (#< num: 63464 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 61 (map1 (#< num: 63462 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 60 (map1 (#< num: 63461 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 59 (map1 (#< num: 63460 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 58 (map1 (#< num: 63459 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 57 (map1 (#< num: 63458 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 56 (map1 (#< num: 63457 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 55 (map1 (#< num: 63456 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 54 (map1 (#< num: 63454 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 53 (map1 (#< num: 63453 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 52 (map1 (#< num: 63452 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 51 (map1 (#< num: 63451 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 50 (map1 (#< num: 63450 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 49 (map1 (#< num: 63449 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 48 (map1 (#< num: 63448 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 47 (map1 (#< num: 63447 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 46 (map1 (#< num: 63446 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35586:29 45 (map1 (#< num: 63445 archived: #f 
blocke…> …))
2023-05-14 23:11:35 Mumi web server listening on http://0.0.0.0:1234/
2023-05-14 23:11:35 In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 
1 (expecting struct): #f
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

-- 
Ricardo





bug#63427: gdk-pixbuf unable to recognize image formats (JPG, PNG, etc.)

2023-05-14 Thread Nathan Dehnel
With another update, the errors went away. Thanks

On Sat, May 13, 2023, 13:38 pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <
pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> wrote:

> Hi Liliana and all.  Until now the user could decide what image loaders
> to install alongside.  Or so I thought.  However, surprisingly I cannot
> get any other loader except gdk-pixbuf and librsvg to work anyway.
>
> That is,
>
> guix shell viewnior webp-pixbuf-loader
>
> surprisingly does not see webp files.  I do not understand.
>
> If this changed patch looks fine, now with proper gexp use, I will push
> it.  The patch continues to include gdk-pixbuf among the inputs even
> though gtk+@2 propagates gdk-pixbuf anyway, but better be explicit.
>
> Regards,
> Florian
>