a <aa...@tuxpa.in> writes:
> first, i i ran guix pull and this happened. > i don't see anything in my kernel logs around this time > > λ ~ guix pull > [1259] > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at > 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... > Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d6f6b57 (667 new commits)... > Building from this channel: > guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d6f6b57 > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... > 100.0% > building > /gnu/store/kxhxsxmann4jv6z62z0ssh011sahk88k-compute-guix-derivation.drv... > Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... /warning: > 'texlive-latex-tools' is deprecated, use 'texlive-tools' instead > warning: 'texlive-latex-graphics' is deprecated, use 'texlive-graphics' > instead > warning: 'texlive-generic-etexcmds' is deprecated, use 'texlive-etexcmds' > instead > warning: 'texlive-generic-infwarerr' is deprecated, use 'texlive-infwarerr' > instead > warning: 'texlive-latex-graphics' is deprecated, use 'texlive-graphics' > instead > warning: 'texlive-latex-graphics' is deprecated, use 'texlive-graphics' > instead > warning: 'texlive-generic-atbegshi' is deprecated, use 'texlive-atbegshi' > instead > warning: 'texlive-latex-atveryend' is deprecated, use 'texlive-atveryend' > instead > \Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 222:29 19 (map1 (#<syntax ((#<syntax lambda> (#<syntax x>) #<syntax x>) > #<syntax:packages.scm:609:30 %supporte?> ?)) > 222:29 18 (map1 (#<syntax ((#<syntax lambda> (#<syntax x>) #<syntax x>) > (#<syntax quote> ()))> #<syntax (#<syn?> ?)) > 222:17 17 (map1 (#<syntax (#<syntax:packages.scm:615:31 sanitize-location> > (#<syntax:packages.scm:614:22 curre?> ?)) > In ice-9/psyntax.scm: > Exception thrown while printing backtrace: > Wrong type to apply: 129 > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:3165:6: In procedure module-gensym: > Invalid read access of chars of wide string: "m-1bcbf699e1749862-28a08" This looks very weird, could you run a disk check and a guix store check just to be safe?
