Tsm replication 7.1

2014-04-30 Thread Robert Ouzen
Hi to all

Long time ago I test the replication feature for DRM purpose. Now I wanted to 
implant it between two TSM servers version 7.1 and O.S Windows 2008 R2 64B.

I have some questions:


· The command replicate node if no domain exist in the TARGET server as 
in SOURCE server  , put the node under the domain STANDARD.

My question is after it can I update the node to a different domain (created on 
the TARGET server but  in the SOURCE server is not exist) , and in the next 
replicate node it will go to this domain and not to STANDARD ?


· In SOURCE server in the command "update fi" it is an option 
replstate=purgedata"   I don't quite understand the purpose  ?



· When replicate node  with type ARCH  have in  ARREPLRULEDEFAULT the 
options :  ALL_DATA ,   ALL_DATA_HIGH_PRIORITY ,  DEFAULT ,  NONE  . I am using 
ALL_DATA

If I have a node in the SOURCE server with archive copygroups  rentention of 
360 days and in the TARGET server in the archive  coypgroups retention of the 
domain STANDARD  is 90.

My question what happen in the replicate node  to the TARGET server  when no 
same archive copygroups retention ? Did all data will be replicate and only 
after running an expire inventory in the TARGET server only the data for 90 
days will remain ? or already during the replicate node only the data for 90 
days with will replicate ?



T.I.A  Best Regards



Robert


memory usage TSM for exchange

2014-04-30 Thread Remco Post
Hi all,

our exchange team has been investigating a problem regarding available memory 
on their servers for quite some time. They've now correlated the alert "A 
significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the 
system paging file" to the end of the TSM exchange backup. We're running TSM 
6.4 with TSM for Mail 6.4 on win 2k8R2 and exchange 2010, on a system with 24 
GB ram (and 4 cpu's).

Anyone got a hint as to what might be causing TSM or the system to use so much 
memory at the end of the backup? And, what can we do to avoid the system paging?

-- 

 Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622


Re: Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

2014-04-30 Thread Rhodes, Richard L.
>Be aware that filesets are different in v5 and v6, and they install in 
>different path.

Yes, that is part of my confusion.  Once for a TSM Server v5->v6 upgrade I 
forgot to uninstall the v5 server and has both installed.  It worked fine, but 
was confusing to figure out the uninstall for the old v5.

So this happens with the storage agent also.  So I should probably uninstall 
the v5 storage agent, then install the v6.2.

Rick




-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann 
Simon
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

Hello Richard,

I'm just answering to the storage agent question on AIX.

Be aware that filesets are different in v5 and v6, and they install in 
different path (under /usr and /opt in v6) so both may be installed 
simultaneously. When upgrading, you have to move the configuration files from 
an install path to the other and adapt the path in startup script or inittab 
entry.


On 29 avril 2014 21:17:59 CEST, "Rhodes, Richard L." 
 wrote:
>We just finished our TSM v5 to TSM v6 server upgrades.  I'll have to 
>say it generally went very well.  Lots of work but no real problems.
>
>Now I have to upgrade a bunch of V5 Storage Agents and TDPO setups.  I 
>looked at the upgrade guide and Storage Agent guide, but didn't find 
>much on how to upgrade them.  All the storage agents are at v551, the 
>highest v5.  Let me ask some questions . . .
>
>- Do you have to uninstall v5 before running install.bin to 
>upgrade/install to v6?
>
>- Since it's not installing DB2, is it possible to just run a smitty 
>install of the AIX binaries, instead of using the Java install.bin pgm?
>
>- Any other thoughts/suggestions for upgrading a Storage Agent?
>
>(Haven't looked at TDPO yet . . .)
>
>Thanks
>
>Rick
>
>
>
>
>-
>The information contained in this message is intended only for the 
>personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the 
>reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent 
>responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>notified that you have received this document in error and that any 
>review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is 
>strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
>please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

--
Erwann SIMON
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.


Re: Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

2014-04-30 Thread Rhodes, Richard L.
> 1) stop TSM services;
> 2) upgrade TSM Client by "smitty update_all";

Yes, this is how I upgrade in TSM v5.
My confusing is that TSMv6 comes as one big package:  
   CZG6SML_TSM_AIX_server_v6.2.1.bin   (v6.2.1 base)
  6.2.5.000-TIV-TSMALL-AIX.bin.   (v6.2.5 upgrade)

The AIX install packages are buried down in the dir structure when this is 
exploded.
How did you run "smitty update_all"? Did you cd to the filesets in this 
structure? 

I really don't want to run the install.bin java gui to do this storage agent 
upgrade.


Thanks!

Rick





asasdasdf

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:45 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

We have done this a year ago (5.5 --> 6.3.3.100).
For Windows TSM Clients:
1) stop all TSM services;
2) run TSM Installer from new agent;
3) start TSM services;
Notes: 1. Stopping TSM services is critical - reboot is required is any of the 
services is not stopped!!
  2) There are some limitations for Windows 2003 (we are using: TSM 
Client 7.1 for Windows 2008/2012 and TSM Client 6.4.1 for Windows 2003, which 
officially is not certified, but required for TBMR  7.1).
For AIX :
1) stop TSM services;
2) upgrade TSM Client by "smitty update_all";
3) start TSM services.
Notes: 1) Maximum allowed version for AIX 5.3 is 6.2 (6.2.4.4 in my case);
   2) There is no limit for AIX 7.1 (7.1 in my case??); For TDP:
1) for Oracle under AIX just "smitty update_all" for selected version (7.1 in 
AIX 7.1);
2) for MS SQL it is much more complicated and you need to pay specific 
attention for each used version and selected target version;
3) for Exchange see MS SQL.
I hope this information will help you at least a little bit:):)


Grigori Solonovitch, Senior Systems Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait, 
www.ahliunited.com.kw


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: 29 04 2014 10:18 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

We just finished our TSM v5 to TSM v6 server upgrades.  I'll have to say it 
generally went very well.  Lots of work but no real problems.

Now I have to upgrade a bunch of V5 Storage Agents and TDPO setups.  I looked 
at the upgrade guide and Storage Agent guide, but didn't find much on how to 
upgrade them.  All the storage agents are at v551, the highest v5.  Let me ask 
some questions . . .

- Do you have to uninstall v5 before running install.bin to upgrade/install to 
v6?

- Since it's not installing DB2, is it possible to just run a smitty install of 
the AIX binaries, instead of using the Java install.bin pgm?

- Any other thoughts/suggestions for upgrading a Storage Agent?

(Haven't looked at TDPO yet . . .)

Thanks

Rick




-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.



Please consider the environment before printing this Email.



CONFIDENTIALITY AND WAIVER: The information contained in this electronic mail 
message and any attachments hereto may be legally privileged and confidential. 
The information is intended only for the recipient(s) named in this message. If 
you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any use, disclosure, 
copying or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error 
please contact the sender and delete this message and any attachments from your 
computer system. We do not guarantee that this message or any attachment to it 
is secure or free from errors, computer viruses or other conditions that may 
damage or interfere with data, hardware or software.


Re: Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

2014-04-30 Thread Grigori Solonovitch
Just rename *.bin to *.tar and un-tar it.

Grigori Solonovitch, Senior Systems Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait, 
www.ahliunited.com.kw


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: 30 04 2014 3:37 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

> 1) stop TSM services;
> 2) upgrade TSM Client by "smitty update_all";

Yes, this is how I upgrade in TSM v5.
My confusing is that TSMv6 comes as one big package:
   CZG6SML_TSM_AIX_server_v6.2.1.bin   (v6.2.1 base)
  6.2.5.000-TIV-TSMALL-AIX.bin.   (v6.2.5 upgrade)

The AIX install packages are buried down in the dir structure when this is 
exploded.
How did you run "smitty update_all"? Did you cd to the filesets in this 
structure?

I really don't want to run the install.bin java gui to do this storage agent 
upgrade.


Thanks!

Rick





asasdasdf

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:45 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

We have done this a year ago (5.5 --> 6.3.3.100).
For Windows TSM Clients:
1) stop all TSM services;
2) run TSM Installer from new agent;
3) start TSM services;
Notes: 1. Stopping TSM services is critical - reboot is required is any of the 
services is not stopped!!
  2) There are some limitations for Windows 2003 (we are using: TSM 
Client 7.1 for Windows 2008/2012 and TSM Client 6.4.1 for Windows 2003, which 
officially is not certified, but required for TBMR  7.1).
For AIX :
1) stop TSM services;
2) upgrade TSM Client by "smitty update_all";
3) start TSM services.
Notes: 1) Maximum allowed version for AIX 5.3 is 6.2 (6.2.4.4 in my case);
   2) There is no limit for AIX 7.1 (7.1 in my case??); For TDP:
1) for Oracle under AIX just "smitty update_all" for selected version (7.1 in 
AIX 7.1);
2) for MS SQL it is much more complicated and you need to pay specific 
attention for each used version and selected target version;
3) for Exchange see MS SQL.
I hope this information will help you at least a little bit:):)


Grigori Solonovitch, Senior Systems Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait, 
www.ahliunited.com.kw


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: 29 04 2014 10:18 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Upgrading to v6 storage agent and TDPO

We just finished our TSM v5 to TSM v6 server upgrades.  I'll have to say it 
generally went very well.  Lots of work but no real problems.

Now I have to upgrade a bunch of V5 Storage Agents and TDPO setups.  I looked 
at the upgrade guide and Storage Agent guide, but didn't find much on how to 
upgrade them.  All the storage agents are at v551, the highest v5.  Let me ask 
some questions . . .

- Do you have to uninstall v5 before running install.bin to upgrade/install to 
v6?

- Since it's not installing DB2, is it possible to just run a smitty install of 
the AIX binaries, instead of using the Java install.bin pgm?

- Any other thoughts/suggestions for upgrading a Storage Agent?

(Haven't looked at TDPO yet . . .)

Thanks

Rick




-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.



Please consider the environment before printing this Email.



CONFIDENTIALITY AND WAIVER: The information contained in this electronic mail 
message and any attachments hereto may be legally privileged and confidential. 
The information is intended only for the recipient(s) named in this message. If 
you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any use, disclosure, 
copying or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error 
please contact the sender and delete this message and any attachments from your 
computer system. We do not guarantee that this message or any attachment to it 
is secure or free from errors, computer viruses or other conditions that may 
damage or interfere with data, hardware or software.




CONFIDENTIALITY AND WAIVER: The information contained in this electronic mail 
message and any attachments hereto may be legally privileged and confidential. 
The information is intended only for the recipient(s) named in this message. If 
you are not the intended recipient you are

AW: Tsm replication 7.1

2014-04-30 Thread Michael malitz
Hallo Robert,

 

interesting questions:

 

As I'm currently  documenting and testing as well the node replication
feature (see
http://www.mm-it.at/de/TSM_Node_Replication_CMDs_Options_at_a_glance.html)

 

I try to share my current knowledge:

 

Domain Change on Target Replication Server:

 

If you move a node to a different domain on the target, replication will
move it back

 

Means, that if I change a domain for the node on the target replication
server AFTER a successful replication and then try another replication to
the same node ,

the domain for the node on the target server changed back (without a
message!!!) to the original one.

 

replstate=purgedata

 

E.g. if you do:   de fi node-name * replstate=purgedata  datatype=backup,
then:

 

è Backup rule data is then set to  state "Purge Data":à  see  q   fi
node *  f=d

è During next replication the objects will be deleted on the target server
(see message during replication) and

è The replstate for the filespace will be set to disabled 

 

 

You can see the status of the deleted objects later on with   q replicaton
node-name   f=d

 

What remains to be clarified for me:  also with "update node"  you have the
"undocumented" option of purgedata  for the replstate, but I can not see any
"purge data" status

 

è My be TSM development can clarify - thanks 

 

Expiration:

 

The Source server instructs target to delete objects during replication

 

rgds Michael

 

michael.mal...@tsmpoweradmin.com

 

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Im Auftrag von
Robert Ouzen
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. April 2014 11:53
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: Tsm replication 7.1

 

Hi to all

 

Long time ago I test the replication feature for DRM purpose. Now I wanted
to implant it between two TSM servers version 7.1 and O.S Windows 2008 R2
64B.

 

I have some questions:

 

 

· The command replicate node if no domain exist in the TARGET server
as in SOURCE server  , put the node under the domain STANDARD.

 

My question is after it can I update the node to a different domain (created
on the TARGET server but  in the SOURCE server is not exist) , and in the
next replicate node it will go to this domain and not to STANDARD ?

 

 

· In SOURCE server in the command "update fi" it is an option
replstate=purgedata"   I don't quite understand the purpose  ?

 

 

 

· When replicate node  with type ARCH  have in  ARREPLRULEDEFAULT
the options :  ALL_DATA ,   ALL_DATA_HIGH_PRIORITY ,  DEFAULT ,  NONE  . I
am using ALL_DATA

 

If I have a node in the SOURCE server with archive copygroups  rentention of
360 days and in the TARGET server in the archive  coypgroups retention of
the domain STANDARD  is 90.

 

My question what happen in the replicate node  to the TARGET server  when no
same archive copygroups retention ? Did all data will be replicate and only
after running an expire inventory in the TARGET server only the data for 90
days will remain ? or already during the replicate node only the data for 90
days with will replicate ?

 

 

 

T.I.A  Best Regards

 

 

 

Robert


Re: memory usage TSM for exchange

2014-04-30 Thread Del Hoobler
Hi Remco,

Judging from these similar posts...


http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/3736df82-e5cb-4665-a97c-eb4a70868271/information-store-database-buffer-paged-during-backup?forum=exchangesvravailabilityandisasterrecoverylegacy

http://www.experts-exchange.com/Software/Server_Software/Email_Servers/Exchange/Q_27697281.html


... it looks like it could be related to activity that the
Exchange Server does during a backup.

It also looks like it's a general backup issue since the same
problem appears with Windows Server Backup as well.

The second link above showed that increasing the page file size helped.


Thank you,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 04/30/2014
07:57:25 AM:

> From: Remco Post 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> Date: 04/30/2014 07:58 AM
> Subject: memory usage TSM for exchange
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Hi all,
>
> our exchange team has been investigating a problem regarding
> available memory on their servers for quite some time. They've now
> correlated the alert "A significant portion of the database buffer
> cache has been written out to the system paging file" to the end of
> the TSM exchange backup. We're running TSM 6.4 with TSM for Mail 6.4
> on win 2k8R2 and exchange 2010, on a system with 24 GB ram (and 4
cpu's).
>
> Anyone got a hint as to what might be causing TSM or the system to
> use so much memory at the end of the backup? And, what can we do to
> avoid the system paging?
>
> --
>
>  Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,
>
> Remco Post
> r.p...@plcs.nl
> +31 6 248 21 622
>


TSM User group meeting May 12, Columbia SC.

2014-04-30 Thread Ken Bury
For agenda and sign-up information go to the http://tivoli-ug.org/ site or
click this link: http://bit.ly/QBq3NM

--
Ken Bury

kenb...@us.ibm.com


Re: AW: Tsm replication 7.1

2014-04-30 Thread Robert Ouzen
Hi Michael

Thank you very much for the information . make more sense now.

Your link is very helpful too ..

I have just need another clarification   about the policy retention , if they 
are not the same in SOURCE and TARGET servers . I mean that I want to keep in 
TARGET server less versions (type backup) or last days (type archive).

To make simple in source F.S (default) - Node (default) - server (ALL_DATA)

So if I have for a node a policy (archive) of keeping 365 days and on the 
TARGET server I just want to keep 60 days. 

During the first replicate node which policy works ? All data for 365 days will 
be replicate or just the data for 60 days ?

T.I.A Best Regards

Robert Ouzen
Haifa University Israel

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Michael malitz
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 3:49 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] AW: Tsm replication 7.1

Hallo Robert,

 

interesting questions:

 

As I'm currently  documenting and testing as well the node replication feature 
(see
http://www.mm-it.at/de/TSM_Node_Replication_CMDs_Options_at_a_glance.html)

 

I try to share my current knowledge:

 

Domain Change on Target Replication Server:

 

If you move a node to a different domain on the target, replication will move 
it back

 

Means, that if I change a domain for the node on the target replication server 
AFTER a successful replication and then try another replication to the same 
node ,

the domain for the node on the target server changed back (without a
message!!!) to the original one.

 

replstate=purgedata

 

E.g. if you do:   de fi node-name * replstate=purgedata  datatype=backup,
then:

 

è Backup rule data is then set to  state "Purge Data":à  see  q   fi
node *  f=d

è During next replication the objects will be deleted on the target server (see 
message during replication) and

è The replstate for the filespace will be set to disabled 

 

 

You can see the status of the deleted objects later on with   q replicaton
node-name   f=d

 

What remains to be clarified for me:  also with "update node"  you have the 
"undocumented" option of purgedata  for the replstate, but I can not see any 
"purge data" status

 

è My be TSM development can clarify - thanks 

 

Expiration:

 

The Source server instructs target to delete objects during replication

 

rgds Michael

 

michael.mal...@tsmpoweradmin.com

 

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Im Auftrag von 
Robert Ouzen
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. April 2014 11:53
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: Tsm replication 7.1

 

Hi to all

 

Long time ago I test the replication feature for DRM purpose. Now I wanted to 
implant it between two TSM servers version 7.1 and O.S Windows 2008 R2 64B.

 

I have some questions:

 

 

· The command replicate node if no domain exist in the TARGET server
as in SOURCE server  , put the node under the domain STANDARD.

 

My question is after it can I update the node to a different domain (created on 
the TARGET server but  in the SOURCE server is not exist) , and in the next 
replicate node it will go to this domain and not to STANDARD ?

 

 

· In SOURCE server in the command "update fi" it is an option
replstate=purgedata"   I don't quite understand the purpose  ?

 

 

 

· When replicate node  with type ARCH  have in  ARREPLRULEDEFAULT
the options :  ALL_DATA ,   ALL_DATA_HIGH_PRIORITY ,  DEFAULT ,  NONE  . I
am using ALL_DATA

 

If I have a node in the SOURCE server with archive copygroups  rentention of
360 days and in the TARGET server in the archive  coypgroups retention of the 
domain STANDARD  is 90.

 

My question what happen in the replicate node  to the TARGET server  when no 
same archive copygroups retention ? Did all data will be replicate and only 
after running an expire inventory in the TARGET server only the data for 90 
days will remain ? or already during the replicate node only the data for 90 
days with will replicate ?

 

 

 

T.I.A  Best Regards

 

 

 

Robert