Re: Incl/Excl Problem

2009-07-24 Thread Wanda Prather
Here's adding my 2c to the confusion:

I agree with Lindsay;  setting
DOMAIN D:
is dangerous, because that way all you get is D:, and if someone adds an E:
drive later, it will be skipped.

So I recommend using Bill's notation:

Domain ALL-LOCAL   -C:
or
Domain ALL-LOCAL
Domain -C:

Domain statements are additive; so if you specify all-local  minus C:, if
someone adds an E: drive later it will be correctly picked up.

However, the original poster wanted to back up a subdirectory on C:
If you exclude C: with a Domain statement, or with exclude.dir, you can't
back up a subdirectory, because TSM will never traverse the C: drive at all.

The only way to backup a subdirectory in C: without backing up all of C: is

exclude c:\...\*
include c:\...\subdir\...\*

And that is going to give you a backup of all the files in subdir, and any
subdirectories of subdir, AND a backup of all the other directory objects on
C: as well. No way around that.

NOW for my quibble, which is with the use of this notation:
INCORRECT:
exclude c:\...\*.*

The include/exclude statements are doing a pattern match against the long
file name.
If you use the notation "*.*", the include/exclude statement will NOT match
any files that do not have a "." in the name.  There aren't a lot, but you
will find some files in window with no suffix.  I have NEVER seen a case in
a real TSM site where the use of this notation was correct, or getting  the
intended results.

The correct notation is c:\...\*

the \ ...\ is a wildcard for any number of subdirectories (including 0
subdirectories), and the * is a pattern match for any number of characters,
so it always works.

Unfortunately the incorrect use of c:\...\*.* persisted in the client manual
for a long time,  but it was an artifact leftover from prehistoric windows
versions, before windows used long file names.  And of course, it still
persists in web-space (and probably will persist long after we're dead
because of that!).  But it's still incorrect.

W






On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, lindsay morris wrote:

> Well, not to quibble, Bill, but you can use exclude.dir to avoid
> getting the C: directories, right?
> And the problem of users / admins adding a drive in the future, and
> TSM then SILENTLY skipping it due to DOMAIN D:,  is real.
>
> I mean, I've seen this happen, and want to warn against this bad
> practice.
> Agree? Disagree?
> --
> Mr. Lindsay Morris
> Principal
> www.tsmworks.com
> 919-403-8260
> lind...@tsmworks.com
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 23, 2009, at Jul 23, 10:54 AM, Bill Boyer wrote:
>
>  I prefer to exclude it from the DOMAIN. That way you won't get the
>> directories on the C: drive. This is from the help.
>>
>>
>> For example, in the following options Tivoli Storage Manager will
>> process all local drives except for the c: drive, systemobject,
>> and systemstate domain:
>>
>>domain ALL-LOCAL -c: -systemobject
>>domain ALL-LOCAL -c: -systemstate
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Boyer
>> "Life is hard. After all, it kills you." - Katharine Hepburn
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
>> Behalf Of
>> lindsay morris
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:27 AM
>> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Incl/Excl Problem
>>
>> Well, there's a problem there:
>> Our ART product has found several customers that shot themselves in
>> the foot by doing this:
>>  DOMAIN D:
>> because they don't want to back up C:, a stock image of windows-and-
>> office.
>>
>> That works fine. But months later, the user adds drive E:, and TSM
>> silently skips it.
>>
>> Better to use exclude of C:, IMHO
>>
>> --
>> Mr. Lindsay Morris
>> Principal
>> www.tsmworks.com
>> 919-403-8260
>> lind...@tsmworks.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 23, 2009, at Jul 23, 10:05 AM, km wrote:
>>
>>  Even easier (no OS involvment) would be to use:
>>>
>>> virtualmountpoint c:\dir
>>> domain c:\dir
>>>
>>> in dsm.opt
>>>
>>> -km
>>>
>>> On 23/07, Adrian Compton wrote:
>>>
 Hi Patryk

 I found the best way to selectively backup directories was to
 create a
 share on the directory, and you can then choose that share as a
 domain
 to backup in your opt file.

 Hope this helps

 Regards



 Adrian Compton
 Aspen Pharmacare Port Elizabeth
 tel: +2741 4072855
 Fax: +2741 453 7452
 Cell: +27823204495
 Email: acomp...@aspenpharma.com
 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
 Behalf Of
 Patryk Bobak
 Sent: 23 July 2009 09:37 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Incl/Excl Problem

 Hi,

 I have problem with Incl/Excl list on client. I've searched forum
 and
 google
 but I cant find good solution. I want to backup only one selected
 folder
 (with subfolders and files) from C:. For example "C:\test\". I
 tryed a
 lot
 of configurations with exclude

Re: Incl/Excl Problem

2009-07-24 Thread lindsay morris

Wanda your two cents is worth at least a dime!

I never knew you could use a MINUS sign in the DOMAIN statement to
EXCLUDE a drive/filespace.
Perfect, easy solution for all those "bad=practice" customers who've
done this!
I hope they lurk here, read this and make the change.

Thank you!

--
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Principal
www.tsmworks.com
919-403-8260
lind...@tsmworks.com




On Jul 24, 2009, at Jul 24, 8:34 AM, Wanda Prather wrote:


Here's adding my 2c to the confusion:

I agree with Lindsay;  setting
DOMAIN D:
is dangerous, because that way all you get is D:, and if someone
adds an E:
drive later, it will be skipped.

So I recommend using Bill's notation:

Domain ALL-LOCAL   -C:
or
Domain ALL-LOCAL
Domain -C:

Domain statements are additive; so if you specify all-local  minus
C:, if
someone adds an E: drive later it will be correctly picked up.

However, the original poster wanted to back up a subdirectory on C:
If you exclude C: with a Domain statement, or with exclude.dir, you
can't
back up a subdirectory, because TSM will never traverse the C: drive
at all.

The only way to backup a subdirectory in C: without backing up all
of C: is

exclude c:\...\*
include c:\...\subdir\...\*

And that is going to give you a backup of all the files in subdir,
and any
subdirectories of subdir, AND a backup of all the other directory
objects on
C: as well. No way around that.

NOW for my quibble, which is with the use of this notation:
INCORRECT:
exclude c:\...\*.*

The include/exclude statements are doing a pattern match against the
long
file name.
If you use the notation "*.*", the include/exclude statement will
NOT match
any files that do not have a "." in the name.  There aren't a lot,
but you
will find some files in window with no suffix.  I have NEVER seen a
case in
a real TSM site where the use of this notation was correct, or
getting  the
intended results.

The correct notation is c:\...\*

the \ ...\ is a wildcard for any number of subdirectories (including 0
subdirectories), and the * is a pattern match for any number of
characters,
so it always works.

Unfortunately the incorrect use of c:\...\*.* persisted in the
client manual
for a long time,  but it was an artifact leftover from prehistoric
windows
versions, before windows used long file names.  And of course, it
still
persists in web-space (and probably will persist long after we're dead
because of that!).  But it's still incorrect.

W






On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, lindsay morris
wrote:


Well, not to quibble, Bill, but you can use exclude.dir to avoid
getting the C: directories, right?
And the problem of users / admins adding a drive in the future, and
TSM then SILENTLY skipping it due to DOMAIN D:,  is real.

I mean, I've seen this happen, and want to warn against this bad
practice.
Agree? Disagree?
--
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Principal
www.tsmworks.com
919-403-8260
lind...@tsmworks.com




On Jul 23, 2009, at Jul 23, 10:54 AM, Bill Boyer wrote:

I prefer to exclude it from the DOMAIN. That way you won't get the

directories on the C: drive. This is from the help.


   For example, in the following options Tivoli Storage Manager will
   process all local drives except for the c: drive, systemobject,
   and systemstate domain:

  domain ALL-LOCAL -c: -systemobject
  domain ALL-LOCAL -c: -systemstate



Bill Boyer
"Life is hard. After all, it kills you." - Katharine Hepburn



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
Behalf Of
lindsay morris
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Incl/Excl Problem

Well, there's a problem there:
Our ART product has found several customers that shot themselves in
the foot by doing this:
DOMAIN D:
because they don't want to back up C:, a stock image of windows-and-
office.

That works fine. But months later, the user adds drive E:, and TSM
silently skips it.

Better to use exclude of C:, IMHO

--
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Principal
www.tsmworks.com
919-403-8260
lind...@tsmworks.com




On Jul 23, 2009, at Jul 23, 10:05 AM, km wrote:

Even easier (no OS involvment) would be to use:


virtualmountpoint c:\dir
domain c:\dir

in dsm.opt

-km

On 23/07, Adrian Compton wrote:


Hi Patryk

I found the best way to selectively backup directories was to
create a
share on the directory, and you can then choose that share as a
domain
to backup in your opt file.

Hope this helps

Regards



Adrian Compton
Aspen Pharmacare Port Elizabeth
tel: +2741 4072855
Fax: +2741 453 7452
Cell: +27823204495
Email: acomp...@aspenpharma.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
Behalf Of
Patryk Bobak
Sent: 23 July 2009 09:37 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Incl/Excl Problem

Hi,

I have problem with Incl/Excl list on client. I've searched forum
and
google
but I cant find good solution. I want to backup only one selected
folder
(with subfolders and files) from C:. For example "C:\test\

two tsm server instances on the same windows server with library-sharing

2009-07-24 Thread TSM
hello,

is it possible, to run two tsm server instances on the same windows system
using the same library?
Are there any special hints for configure the tsm server and the library
sharing?

tsm server version 5.5.3.0

with best regards
andreas


Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread Druckenmiller, David
Just wondering if anyone knows what the market might be for a 3-frame 3494 with 
8 3590-H1A drives.  Also, is there market for about 1800 used 3590E cartridges? 
 We just finished migrating off and my boss just wants to trash the whole 
thing.  I'd be curious to know just how much money they're throwing away.  
Thanks.

-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain
confidential information that is protected by law and is for the
sole use of the individuals or entities to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
replying to this email and destroying all copies of the
communication and attachments. Further use, disclosure, copying,
distribution of, or reliance upon the contents of this email and
attachments is strictly prohibited. To contact Albany Medical
Center, or for a copy of our privacy practices, please visit us on
the Internet at www.amc.edu.


Re: Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread Kelly Lipp
I'll take it!

Just kidding: I'm thinking this has some rather significant value.  Try eBay...

Kelly Lipp
CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
719-266-8777 x7105
www.storserver.com


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Druckenmiller, David
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 12:51 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Used 3494 / 3590 equip

Just wondering if anyone knows what the market might be for a 3-frame 3494 with 
8 3590-H1A drives.  Also, is there market for about 1800 used 3590E cartridges? 
 We just finished migrating off and my boss just wants to trash the whole 
thing.  I'd be curious to know just how much money they're throwing away.  
Thanks.

-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain
confidential information that is protected by law and is for the
sole use of the individuals or entities to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
replying to this email and destroying all copies of the
communication and attachments. Further use, disclosure, copying,
distribution of, or reliance upon the contents of this email and
attachments is strictly prohibited. To contact Albany Medical
Center, or for a copy of our privacy practices, please visit us on
the Internet at www.amc.edu.


Re: Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread Shawn Drew
Depending on the criticality, it might be a negative value considering
maintenance costs for old hardware.  Best bet would be to ask those
used/refurbished online places.


Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew





Internet
druc...@mail.amc.edu

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
07/24/2009 02:51 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] Used 3494 / 3590 equip






Just wondering if anyone knows what the market might be for a 3-frame 3494
with 8 3590-H1A drives.  Also, is there market for about 1800 used 3590E
cartridges?  We just finished migrating off and my boss just wants to
trash the whole thing.  I'd be curious to know just how much money they're
throwing away.  Thanks.

-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain
confidential information that is protected by law and is for the
sole use of the individuals or entities to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
replying to this email and destroying all copies of the
communication and attachments. Further use, disclosure, copying,
distribution of, or reliance upon the contents of this email and
attachments is strictly prohibited. To contact Albany Medical
Center, or for a copy of our privacy practices, please visit us on
the Internet at www.amc.edu.



This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error,
please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord
with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial,
is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the
integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will)
not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain
functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.


Re: Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread Richard Rhodes
There are companies that purchase old/used media, erase it, then resell it.






 "Druckenmiller,
 David"
  ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Sent by: "ADSM:cc
 Dist Stor
 Manager"  Subject
 


 07/24/2009 02:53
 PM


 Please respond to
 "ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager"
 






Just wondering if anyone knows what the market might be for a 3-frame 3494
with 8 3590-H1A drives.  Also, is there market for about 1800 used 3590E
cartridges?  We just finished migrating off and my boss just wants to trash
the whole thing.  I'd be curious to know just how much money they're
throwing away.  Thanks.

-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain
confidential information that is protected by law and is for the
sole use of the individuals or entities to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
replying to this email and destroying all copies of the
communication and attachments. Further use, disclosure, copying,
distribution of, or reliance upon the contents of this email and
attachments is strictly prohibited. To contact Albany Medical
Center, or for a copy of our privacy practices, please visit us on
the Internet at www.amc.edu.



-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.


Re: Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread John D. Schneider
David,
If you want to email me individually, I can give you a line on both
issues. We just retired a 3494, a 3584, and thousands of 3590 and 3592
cartridges about a year ago.
 

Best Regards,
 
 John D. Schneider
 The Computer Coaching Community, LLC
 Office: (314) 635-5424 / Toll Free: (866) 796-9226
 Cell: (314) 750-8721
 
 
   Original Message 
Subject: [ADSM-L] Used 3494 / 3590 equip
From: "Druckenmiller, David" 
Date: Fri, July 24, 2009 1:51 pm
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

Just wondering if anyone knows what the market might be for a 3-frame
3494 with 8 3590-H1A drives. Also, is there market for about 1800 used
3590E cartridges? We just finished migrating off and my boss just wants
to trash the whole thing. I'd be curious to know just how much money
they're throwing away. Thanks.

-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain
confidential information that is protected by law and is for the
sole use of the individuals or entities to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
replying to this email and destroying all copies of the
communication and attachments. Further use, disclosure, copying,
distribution of, or reliance upon the contents of this email and
attachments is strictly prohibited. To contact Albany Medical
Center, or for a copy of our privacy practices, please visit us on
the Internet at www.amc.edu.