change websess timeout
In old versions of TSM we have this command "webauthtimeout" for websessions on ISC. Now we use ISC 6.0.1.1 and Administration Center 5.5.0.0, TSM 5.5 I can't find appropriate command for this action in current version. Please help change timeout for websessions in ISC!!!
Re: change websess timeout
HI,
Do following steps
C:\Program Files\IBM\ISC\Tivoli\dsm\bin>supportUtil.bat
Administration Center Support Utility - Main Menu
==
1. Turn all tracing on
2. Turn all tracing off
3. Turn a single trace class on
4. Update the maximum memory size Administration Center can use
5. Update the Administration Center session timeout setting
6. Collect trace files, logs and system information to send to
support
7. View the log file for this utility
9. Exit
Enter Selection:
Session Time-out Setting
The session time out is the amount of idle time that the server waits before
forcing the administrator to login again. The default is 30 minutes.
This is the replacement to SET WEBTIMEOUT on the old interface.
( o )
---
I,I ' ' I,I
"(("
))
With Best Regards,
Sandeep Jain
** Legal
Disclaimer*
"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error,
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
*
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Sitnikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 1:53 PM
Subject: [ADSM-L] change websess timeout
In old versions of TSM we have this command "webauthtimeout" for
websessions on ISC.
Now we use ISC 6.0.1.1 and Administration Center 5.5.0.0, TSM 5.5
I can't find appropriate command for this action in current version.
Please help change timeout for websessions in ISC!!!
This email has been scanned for any virus infection at the sending end.
Policy Domain..
Iam using TSM V5.4.I want to set Backup Copy group policy with the below conditions. Policy Domain Name POL_DOM Policy Set Name ACTIVE Mgmt Class Name STANDARD Copy Group Name STANDARD Versions Data Exists 3 Versions Data Deleted 1 Retain Extra Versions 120 Retain Only Version 30 I have a query that if a file is backed up only once and never modified, still on the Client file system, when will that file expire according to the policy which I have configured as the above. Regards, Kiran.
Re: Policy Domain..
On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:48 AM, MAHENDER wrote: I have a query that if a file is backed up only once and never modified, still on the Client file system, when will that file expire according to the policy which I have configured as the above. That's the definition of the Active version of a file, which stays in TSM storage indefinitely. See the Admin Guide manual. Richard Sims
Re: Policy Domain..
How long do really need this data to be kept for ? 2008/6/6 MAHENDER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Iam using TSM V5.4.I want to set Backup Copy group policy with the below > conditions. > > > > Policy Domain Name POL_DOM > > Policy Set Name ACTIVE > > Mgmt Class Name STANDARD > > Copy Group Name STANDARD > > Versions Data Exists 3 > > Versions Data Deleted 1 > > Retain Extra Versions 120 > > Retain Only Version 30 > > > > I have a query that if a file is backed up only once and never modified, > still on the Client file system, when will that file expire according to > the > policy which I have configured as the above. > > > > Regards, > > Kiran. >
Re: Policy Domain..
it should never expire as it would be covered by the versions data exists. Cory Heikel Tivoli Systems Administrator Hershey Medical Center (717) 531-7972 >>> Lawrence Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/6/2008 9:54 AM >>> How long do really need this data to be kept for ? 2008/6/6 MAHENDER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Iam using TSM V5.4.I want to set Backup Copy group policy with the below > conditions. > > > > Policy Domain Name POL_DOM > > Policy Set Name ACTIVE > > Mgmt Class Name STANDARD > > Copy Group Name STANDARD > > Versions Data Exists 3 > > Versions Data Deleted 1 > > Retain Extra Versions 120 > > Retain Only Version 30 > > > > I have a query that if a file is backed up only once and never modified, > still on the Client file system, when will that file expire according to > the > policy which I have configured as the above. > > > > Regards, > > Kiran. >
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
Looks like someting happened between 06/05/08 01:25:26 and 06/05/08 05:26:07. Did you checkout using option remove=no ? Good luck -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Everyone, I have a TSM server 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 with an external library which is a SUN SL8500 and Gresham EDT manages the drive requests. I have come across an issue where the tape is physically in the library, but TSM says that it is not present. Any ideas/suggestions on what can be done? Thanks in advance! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR8337I LTO volume T04269 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR0513I Process 18285 opened output volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:23:36 ANR0514I Session 505692 closed volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692) 06/05/08 01:24:36 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T04269 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 01:24:41 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T04269 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:25:26 ANR8468I LTO volume T04269 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR8313E Volume T04269 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T04269 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T04269 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/06/08 08:35:27 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t04269 f=d (SESSION: 558950) ACSSA> display volume t04269 2008-06-06 08:36:04 Display Volume Vol_id Acs Lsm Panel Row Column Pool StatusMedia Type T04269 0117 30 100home LTO-200G data Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
Hi Anil, No, there were no checkouts being done against this tape or any of the others that I have seen experience this error. I have narrowed it down to 6 tape drives within the library, most of which are happening on 3. As you see below the tape is mounted/dismounted ok and then several hrs. later it is requested to be mounted again and it says it's not present in the library when in fact it is. I have been looking at 25 tapes for this past week which have experienced this issue and it is all the same. The tape is physically in the library (I have checked through ACSLS which is the software that controls the SUN SL8500) and we also did an audit of the library at the beginning of the week to resolve this issue, but that doesn't appear to have helped. I'm having the vendor of the tape drives check out the 6 drives to see if it is a hardware issue with the drives or a robot in the library or something... but I can't pinpoint what is causing this issue yet. Thanks! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Anil Maurya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 06/06/2008 10:41 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Looks like someting happened between 06/05/08 01:25:26 and 06/05/08 05:26:07. Did you checkout using option remove=no ? Good luck -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Everyone, I have a TSM server 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 with an external library which is a SUN SL8500 and Gresham EDT manages the drive requests. I have come across an issue where the tape is physically in the library, but TSM says that it is not present. Any ideas/suggestions on what can be done? Thanks in advance! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR8337I LTO volume T04269 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR0513I Process 18285 opened output volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:23:36 ANR0514I Session 505692 closed volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692) 06/05/08 01:24:36 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T04269 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 01:24:41 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T04269 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:25:26 ANR8468I LTO volume T04269 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR8313E Volume T04269 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T04269 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T04269 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/06/08 08:35:27 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t04269 f=d (SESSION: 558950) ACSSA> display volume t04269 2008-06-06 08:36:04 Display Volume Vol_id Acs Lsm Panel Row Column Pool StatusMedia Type T04269 0117 30 100home LTO-200G data Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
I would recommend open ticket with TSM support. This needs more digging. Good luck -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:50 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Anil, No, there were no checkouts being done against this tape or any of the others that I have seen experience this error. I have narrowed it down to 6 tape drives within the library, most of which are happening on 3. As you see below the tape is mounted/dismounted ok and then several hrs. later it is requested to be mounted again and it says it's not present in the library when in fact it is. I have been looking at 25 tapes for this past week which have experienced this issue and it is all the same. The tape is physically in the library (I have checked through ACSLS which is the software that controls the SUN SL8500) and we also did an audit of the library at the beginning of the week to resolve this issue, but that doesn't appear to have helped. I'm having the vendor of the tape drives check out the 6 drives to see if it is a hardware issue with the drives or a robot in the library or something... but I can't pinpoint what is causing this issue yet. Thanks! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Anil Maurya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 06/06/2008 10:41 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Looks like someting happened between 06/05/08 01:25:26 and 06/05/08 05:26:07. Did you checkout using option remove=no ? Good luck -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Everyone, I have a TSM server 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 with an external library which is a SUN SL8500 and Gresham EDT manages the drive requests. I have come across an issue where the tape is physically in the library, but TSM says that it is not present. Any ideas/suggestions on what can be done? Thanks in advance! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR8337I LTO volume T04269 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR0513I Process 18285 opened output volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:23:36 ANR0514I Session 505692 closed volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692) 06/05/08 01:24:36 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T04269 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 01:24:41 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T04269 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:25:26 ANR8468I LTO volume T04269 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR8313E Volume T04269 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T04269 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T04269 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/06/08 08:35:27 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t04269 f=d (SESSION: 558950) ACSSA> display volume t04269 2008-06-06 08:36:04 Display Volume Vol_id Acs Lsm Panel Row Column Pool StatusMedia Type T04269 0117 30 100home LTO-200G data Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best practice for Policy Domains
I think "best practice" is whatever gives you the most control and consistent results, and it will vary depending on your site conditions. It is extremely difficult to figure out after the fact (say 2 years from now), what data is bound to what management classes, if you have a lot of them, and if you don't have direct access to the clients. I have customers where the TSM admins have direct access to the clients, there are a small number of clients, and using a management class to control retention works just fine. I have another customer where the number of management classes has turned into a nightmare. Nobody knows exactly which of the 180 clients (split across 8 subsidiary departments) are currently using which management classes. My recommendation was to divide the clients into more domains, where the default mgmt class would control retention and the target stgpool. That way it will be more transparently obvious how the clients are being managed, and harder for Junior TSM admins to do it wrong.For that site, more domains is going to work better. YMMV. On 6/5/08, Shannon Bach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By using the Policy Domain as a retention bucket the TSM Admins are able > to have a better control of what each clients data actually is retained > for. By using the management classes we can only find out on the actual > clients...which we do not always (and in some cases due to the nature of > the data... never have access to). That would be the biggest pro for > us...higher level control. > > > > EVILUTION <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > 06/05/2008 02:53 PM > Please respond to > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > To > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > cc > > Subject > Best practice for Policy Domains > > > > > > > Why not use the managment class to set retention? > > +-- > |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +-- >
Re: ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation
Backint/Brbackup usually run under an application userid ( e.g. oracle) Check the ulimit settings for the user id. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruud van Ruler Sent: June-03-08 8:23 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation thanks but I do think this option is valid for FS backups and not for DB backups with BACKINT/TDP the issue occurred during a db backup with BACKINT/TDP. rgds Ruud -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anil Maurya Sent: maandag 2 juni 2008 19:57 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation I have seen similar error before and we got resolved by putting following in dsm.sys memoryefficientbackupyes THX -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruud van Ruler Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:05 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation Hi DB backup failed due to ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation ... see log results below Is this a TSM server or TSM client issue ? and what could be the cause ? TSM Server: Version 5, Release 3, Level 5.0 TSM Client: 5.3.0.0 Both TSM Server and Client run on AIX 5300-06 thanks in advance rgds, Ruud log result: BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2008-05-21 05.17.55 BR0232I 1209 of 1209 files saved by backup utility BR0230I Backup utility called successfully BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2008-05-21 05.18.06 BR0317I 'Alter database end backup' successful BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2008-05-21 05.18.06 BR0340I Switching to next online redo log file for database instance PB5 ... BR0321I Switch to next online redo log file for database instance PB5 successful BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2008-05-21 05.18.08 BR0229I Calling backup utility with function 'backup'... BR0278I Command output of '/usr/sap/PB5/SYS/exe/run/backint -u PB5 -f backup -i /oracle/PB5/sapbackup/.bdxysfme.lst -t fil e -p /oracle/PB5/dbs/initPB5.utl.brbonline -c': Data Protection for mySAP(R) Interface between SAPDBA Utilities and Tivoli Storage Manager - Version 5, Release 3, Modification 0 for AIX LF 64-bit - Build: 257 compiled on Nov 23 2004 (c) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1996, 2004, All Rights Reserved. BKI2027I: Using TSM-API version 5.3.0.0 (compiled with 5.3.0.0). BKI2000I: Successfully connected to ProLE on port tdpr3ora64. BKI0005I: Start of program at: Wed May 21 05:18:08 CUT 2008 . BKI1214E: TSM Error: ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation. BKI1214E: TSM Error: ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation. BKI1214E: TSM Error: ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation. BKI1214E: TSM Error: ANS1075E (RC102) *(*)The operating system refused a TSM request for memory allocation. BKI1201E: There are no Tivoli Storage Manager-Servers available. BKI1203E: Not enough sessions available (4 required and 0 available). BKI1215I: Average transmission rate was 0.000 GB/h (0.000 MB/sec). BKI1227I: Average compression factor was 1.000. BKI0020I: End of program at: Wed May 21 05:18:10 CUT 2008 . BKI0021I: Elapsed time: 02 sec . BKI0024I: Return code is: 2.
Best practice for Policy Domains
Okay I can see how that would help keep tabs on whats going where. Though it does seem odd that you would need more than a handful of retentions especially defaults. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--
Re: Best practice for Policy Domains
Our general rule here is each node gets its own policy domain, that way I rarely have to deal with any includes for management classes. >>> Wanda Prather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/6/2008 11:18 AM >>> I think "best practice" is whatever gives you the most control and consistent results, and it will vary depending on your site conditions. It is extremely difficult to figure out after the fact (say 2 years from now), what data is bound to what management classes, if you have a lot of them, and if you don't have direct access to the clients. I have customers where the TSM admins have direct access to the clients, there are a small number of clients, and using a management class to control retention works just fine. I have another customer where the number of management classes has turned into a nightmare. Nobody knows exactly which of the 180 clients (split across 8 subsidiary departments) are currently using which management classes. My recommendation was to divide the clients into more domains, where the default mgmt class would control retention and the target stgpool. That way it will be more transparently obvious how the clients are being managed, and harder for Junior TSM admins to do it wrong.For that site, more domains is going to work better. YMMV. On 6/5/08, Shannon Bach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By using the Policy Domain as a retention bucket the TSM Admins are able > to have a better control of what each clients data actually is retained > for. By using the management classes we can only find out on the actual > clients...which we do not always (and in some cases due to the nature of > the data... never have access to). That would be the biggest pro for > us...higher level control. > > > > EVILUTION <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > 06/05/2008 02:53 PM > Please respond to > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > To > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > cc > > Subject > Best practice for Policy Domains > > > > > > > Why not use the managment class to set retention? > > +-- > |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +-- >
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
Try auditing the library with the following three commands: Audit library libname checklabel=barcode Checkin libvol libname search=yes checklabel=barcode status=scratch Checkin libvol libname search=yes checklabel=barcode status=private These three commands will rationalize the library inventory and check in any volumes that aren't already checked it (which seems to be your problem). All of that said, I'm not familiar with Gresham so don't know if there are any gotchas. Thanks, Kelly Lipp CTO STORServer, Inc. 485-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-266-8777 www.storserver.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 6:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Everyone, I have a TSM server 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 with an external library which is a SUN SL8500 and Gresham EDT manages the drive requests. I have come across an issue where the tape is physically in the library, but TSM says that it is not present. Any ideas/suggestions on what can be done? Thanks in advance! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR8337I LTO volume T04269 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR0513I Process 18285 opened output volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:23:36 ANR0514I Session 505692 closed volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692) 06/05/08 01:24:36 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T04269 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 01:24:41 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T04269 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:25:26 ANR8468I LTO volume T04269 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR8313E Volume T04269 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T04269 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T04269 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/06/08 08:35:27 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t04269 f=d (SESSION: 558950) ACSSA> display volume t04269 2008-06-06 08:36:04 Display Volume Vol_id Acs Lsm Panel Row Column Pool StatusMedia Type T04269 0117 30 100home LTO-200G data Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
Hi Kelly, Thanks for the suggestion, but this is an externally managed library and I do not check the tapes into TSM. They are all managed by a pool within the library and that pool is defined to the Gresham EDT software which sits between TSM & ACSLS/SL8500 library. : ) Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Kelly Lipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 06/06/2008 12:11 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Try auditing the library with the following three commands: Audit library libname checklabel=barcode Checkin libvol libname search=yes checklabel=barcode status=scratch Checkin libvol libname search=yes checklabel=barcode status=private These three commands will rationalize the library inventory and check in any volumes that aren't already checked it (which seems to be your problem). All of that said, I'm not familiar with Gresham so don't know if there are any gotchas. Thanks, Kelly Lipp CTO STORServer, Inc. 485-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-266-8777 www.storserver.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 6:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Everyone, I have a TSM server 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 with an external library which is a SUN SL8500 and Gresham EDT manages the drive requests. I have come across an issue where the tape is physically in the library, but TSM says that it is not present. Any ideas/suggestions on what can be done? Thanks in advance! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR8337I LTO volume T04269 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR0513I Process 18285 opened output volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:23:36 ANR0514I Session 505692 closed volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692) 06/05/08 01:24:36 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T04269 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 01:24:41 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T04269 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:25:26 ANR8468I LTO volume T04269 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR8313E Volume T04269 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T04269 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T04269 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/06/08 08:35:27 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t04269 f=d (SESSION: 558950) ACSSA> display volume t04269 2008-06-06 08:36:04 Display Volume Vol_id Acs Lsm Panel Row Column Pool StatusMedia Type T04269 0117 30 100home LTO-200G data Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
The first thing I would check is that the tapes are not still in the drives via ACSLS command 'q dr all' and 'q vol '. The 'q vol' will give you the status and location of the volume. When you say you ran an audit, was it an ACSLS audit or a TSM audit? We've had problems where the drive never actually ejected the tape. Gerald Michalak Certified TSM V5 Administrator Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ARK.COM> To Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU> Re: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library 06/06/2008 09:49 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU> Hi Anil, No, there were no checkouts being done against this tape or any of the others that I have seen experience this error. I have narrowed it down to 6 tape drives within the library, most of which are happening on 3. As you see below the tape is mounted/dismounted ok and then several hrs. later it is requested to be mounted again and it says it's not present in the library when in fact it is. I have been looking at 25 tapes for this past week which have experienced this issue and it is all the same. The tape is physically in the library (I have checked through ACSLS which is the software that controls the SUN SL8500) and we also did an audit of the library at the beginning of the week to resolve this issue, but that doesn't appear to have helped. I'm having the vendor of the tape drives check out the 6 drives to see if it is a hardware issue with the drives or a robot in the library or something... but I can't pinpoint what is causing this issue yet. Thanks! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Anil Maurya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 06/06/2008 10:41 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Looks like someting happened between 06/05/08 01:25:26 and 06/05/08 05:26:07. Did you checkout using option remove=no ? Good luck -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Everyone, I have a TSM server 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 with an external library which is a SUN SL8500 and Gresham EDT manages the drive requests. I have come across an issue where the tape is physically in the library, but TSM says that it is not present. Any ideas/suggestions on what can be done? Thanks in advance! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR8337I LTO volume T04269 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR0513I Process 18285 opened output volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:23:36 ANR0514I Session 505692 closed volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692) 06/05/08 01:24:36 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T04269 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 01:24:41 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T04269 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:25:26 ANR8468I LTO volume T04269 dismounted from drive SL8500
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
Joni, When you figure out whassup, post the response here! Always ready to learn more. Kelly Lipp CTO STORServer, Inc. 485-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-266-8777 www.storserver.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:16 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Kelly, Thanks for the suggestion, but this is an externally managed library and I do not check the tapes into TSM. They are all managed by a pool within the library and that pool is defined to the Gresham EDT software which sits between TSM & ACSLS/SL8500 library. : ) Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Kelly Lipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 06/06/2008 12:11 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Try auditing the library with the following three commands: Audit library libname checklabel=barcode Checkin libvol libname search=yes checklabel=barcode status=scratch Checkin libvol libname search=yes checklabel=barcode status=private These three commands will rationalize the library inventory and check in any volumes that aren't already checked it (which seems to be your problem). All of that said, I'm not familiar with Gresham so don't know if there are any gotchas. Thanks, Kelly Lipp CTO STORServer, Inc. 485-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-266-8777 www.storserver.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 6:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Everyone, I have a TSM server 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 with an external library which is a SUN SL8500 and Gresham EDT manages the drive requests. I have come across an issue where the tape is physically in the library, but TSM says that it is not present. Any ideas/suggestions on what can be done? Thanks in advance! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR8337I LTO volume T04269 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR0513I Process 18285 opened output volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:23:36 ANR0514I Session 505692 closed volume T04269. (SESSION: 505692) 06/05/08 01:24:36 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T04269 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 01:24:41 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T04269 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 01:25:26 ANR8468I LTO volume T04269 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt5) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR8313E Volume T04269 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T04269 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/05/08 05:26:07 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T04269 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 507496, PROCESS: 18312) 06/06/08 08:35:27 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t04269 f=d (SESSION: 558950) ACSSA> display volume t04269 2008-06-06 08:36:04 Display Volume Vol_id Acs Lsm Panel Row Column Pool StatusMedia Type T04269 0117 30 100home LTO-200G data Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
Hi Gerald, The tapes are in slots within the library and are not currently in drives. We ran an ACSLS audit to clean up any discrepancies. I've also found some more interesting information. It looks like at 2:02 AM this tape dismounted from the drive. Then at 2:30AM a request came in to mount the same tape and from the ACSLS logs it shows that it mounted T03735 in drive 0,2,1,7 and dismounted it not even a minute later, but TSM reported the ANR8313E message that it was not present in the library. I then had our operators eject the tape and re-enter it just in case there were still any issues. At this point I don't really know where the problem lies. I would assume it's not the library as it did mount the tape when requested. I think I'm going to open a ticket with IBM to see what they say as I do not see any definitive answers within the logs. If anyone can think of anything just let me know. Thanks! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 00:00:39 ANR8337I LTO volume T03735 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18). (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 00:00:56 ANR1340I Scratch volume T03735 is now defined in storage pool COPY_ORACLE. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 00:00:59 ANR0513I Process 18281 opened output volume T03735. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:00:04 ANR0514I Session 504916 closed volume T03735. (SESSION: 504916) 06/05/08 02:01:04 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T03735 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 02:01:10 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T03735 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18). (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:02:13 ANR8468I LTO volume T03735 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR8313E Volume T03735 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T03735 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T03735 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/06/08 08:30:58 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t03735 f=d (SESSION: 558899) 06/06/08 08:31:17 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY ACTLOG begind=06/05/2008 begint=02:00 search=t03735 (SESSION: 558908) 06/06/08 12:10:29 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: UPDATE VOLUME t03735 acc=readw (SESSION: 560504) 06/06/08 12:10:29 ANR2207I Volume T03735 updated. (SESSION: 560504) 06/06/08 12:20:31 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t03735 f=d (SESSION: 560576) 2008-06-05 00:00:37 MOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,1 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:02:13 DISMOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,1 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:30:42 MOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,7 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:02:13 DISMOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,1 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:30:42 MOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,7 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:31:15 DISMOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,7 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-06 10:21:26 EJECT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Cap 0,1,0 Client Host Id Local 2008-06-06 10:31:08 ENTER T03735 Home 0,2,47,1,1 Cap 0,1,0 Client Host Id Local Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Gerald Michalak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 06/06/2008 12:35 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library The first thing I would check is that the tapes are not still in the drives via ACSLS command 'q dr all' and 'q vol '. The 'q vol' will give you the status and location of the volume. When you say you ran an audit, was it an ACSLS audit or a TSM audit? We've had problems where the drive never actually ejected the tape. Gerald Michalak Certified TSM V5 Administrator Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ARK.COM> To Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
Joni, Are you using any sort of volume access control on ACSLS? Since you haven't attempted to remove the volumes from the library, the next most common cause would be that access to the volumes has been denied to EDT by ACSLS. It's also possible that there's something else going on, but I would need to see the elm.conf file, EDT diagnostic log and TSM activity log for today to determine what errors EDT is getting back from ACSLS when we request the volume. If you wish you can email the files to us at support AT greshamstorage DOT com, and I'll take a look at them. Best Regards, 'Chel Michel Huber Gresham EDT Level 3 Support From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Joni Moyer Sent: Fri 6/6/2008 11:51 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Gerald, The tapes are in slots within the library and are not currently in drives. We ran an ACSLS audit to clean up any discrepancies. I've also found some more interesting information. It looks like at 2:02 AM this tape dismounted from the drive. Then at 2:30AM a request came in to mount the same tape and from the ACSLS logs it shows that it mounted T03735 in drive 0,2,1,7 and dismounted it not even a minute later, but TSM reported the ANR8313E message that it was not present in the library. I then had our operators eject the tape and re-enter it just in case there were still any issues. At this point I don't really know where the problem lies. I would assume it's not the library as it did mount the tape when requested. I think I'm going to open a ticket with IBM to see what they say as I do not see any definitive answers within the logs. If anyone can think of anything just let me know. Thanks! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 00:00:39 ANR8337I LTO volume T03735 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18). (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 00:00:56 ANR1340I Scratch volume T03735 is now defined in storage pool COPY_ORACLE. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 00:00:59 ANR0513I Process 18281 opened output volume T03735. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:00:04 ANR0514I Session 504916 closed volume T03735. (SESSION: 504916) 06/05/08 02:01:04 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T03735 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 02:01:10 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T03735 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18). (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:02:13 ANR8468I LTO volume T03735 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR8313E Volume T03735 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T03735 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T03735 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/06/08 08:30:58 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t03735 f=d (SESSION: 558899) 06/06/08 08:31:17 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY ACTLOG begind=06/05/2008 begint=02:00 search=t03735 (SESSION: 558908) 06/06/08 12:10:29 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: UPDATE VOLUME t03735 acc=readw (SESSION: 560504) 06/06/08 12:10:29 ANR2207I Volume T03735 updated. (SESSION: 560504) 06/06/08 12:20:31 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t03735 f=d (SESSION: 560576) 2008-06-05 00:00:37 MOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,1 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:02:13 DISMOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,1 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:30:42 MOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,7 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:02:13 DISMOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,1 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:30:42 MOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,7 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:31:15 DISMOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,7 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-06 10:21:26 EJECT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Cap 0,1,0 Client Host Id Local 2008-06-06 10:31:08 ENTER T03735 Home 0,2,47,1,1 Cap 0,1,0 Client Host Id Local Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Gerald Michalak" <[EMAIL PRO
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????
Hi Chel! I sent the info. to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I'm not sure where to find the EDT diagnostics log. You should have all of the other info. requested. Thanks so much! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Support - US" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 06/06/2008 12:54 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Joni, Are you using any sort of volume access control on ACSLS? Since you haven't attempted to remove the volumes from the library, the next most common cause would be that access to the volumes has been denied to EDT by ACSLS. It's also possible that there's something else going on, but I would need to see the elm.conf file, EDT diagnostic log and TSM activity log for today to determine what errors EDT is getting back from ACSLS when we request the volume. If you wish you can email the files to us at support AT greshamstorage DOT com, and I'll take a look at them. Best Regards, 'Chel Michel Huber Gresham EDT Level 3 Support From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Joni Moyer Sent: Fri 6/6/2008 11:51 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library Hi Gerald, The tapes are in slots within the library and are not currently in drives. We ran an ACSLS audit to clean up any discrepancies. I've also found some more interesting information. It looks like at 2:02 AM this tape dismounted from the drive. Then at 2:30AM a request came in to mount the same tape and from the ACSLS logs it shows that it mounted T03735 in drive 0,2,1,7 and dismounted it not even a minute later, but TSM reported the ANR8313E message that it was not present in the library. I then had our operators eject the tape and re-enter it just in case there were still any issues. At this point I don't really know where the problem lies. I would assume it's not the library as it did mount the tape when requested. I think I'm going to open a ticket with IBM to see what they say as I do not see any definitive answers within the logs. If anyone can think of anything just let me know. Thanks! Date/Time Message -- 06/05/08 00:00:39 ANR8337I LTO volume T03735 mounted in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18). (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 00:00:56 ANR1340I Scratch volume T03735 is now defined in storage pool COPY_ORACLE. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 00:00:59 ANR0513I Process 18281 opened output volume T03735. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:00:04 ANR0514I Session 504916 closed volume T03735. (SESSION: 504916) 06/05/08 02:01:04 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T03735 - 1 minute mount retention expired. 06/05/08 02:01:10 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T03735 in drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18). (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:02:13 ANR8468I LTO volume T03735 dismounted from drive SL8500 (/dev/rmt18) in library SL8500. (SESSION: 504916, PROCESS: 18281) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR8313E Volume T03735 is not present in library SL8500. (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume T03735 - volume unavailable. (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/05/08 02:31:15 ANR1410W Access mode for volume T03735 now set to "unavailable". (SESSION: 506649, PROCESS: 18290) 06/06/08 08:30:58 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t03735 f=d (SESSION: 558899) 06/06/08 08:31:17 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY ACTLOG begind=06/05/2008 begint=02:00 search=t03735 (SESSION: 558908) 06/06/08 12:10:29 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: UPDATE VOLUME t03735 acc=readw (SESSION: 560504) 06/06/08 12:10:29 ANR2207I Volume T03735 updated. (SESSION: 560504) 06/06/08 12:20:31 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY VOLUME t03735 f=d (SESSION: 560576) 2008-06-05 00:00:37 MOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,1 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:02:13 DISMOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,1 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:30:42 MOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,19,0 Drive 0,2,1,7 Client Host Id 157.154.47.18 2008-06-05 02:02:13 DISMOUNT T03735 Home 0,2,47,1
