[racket-users] Re: “If you could have a wish granted, what would you like to see next in Racket?”

Faster load time and less memory consumption. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion

[racket-users] Re: Racket CS release plan

I noticed that the size of the CS version is 244% compare to BS version. Wondering why it became so large. Does that mean Chez Scheme runtime/vm 100 MB larger than the original one? Racket Mac OS X 64-bit Intel 116.7 MB SHA1: 521b5a264afcfb3f390afacc682987268f650a25 Racket CS Mac OS X

[racket-users] Strange performance behavior

I was working on a exercism problem named Raindrops. Problem description: Convert a number to a string, the contents of which depend on the number's factors. If the number has 3 as a factor, output 'Pling'. If the number has 5 as a factor, output 'Plang'. If the number has 7 as a factor, output

Re: [racket-users] Strange performance behavior

t; On my machine, I get 40 ms for version 1, and 100 ms for version 2, as > you expected. > > Sam > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 11:21 AM wanp...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > I was working on a exercism problem named Raindrops. > > > > Problem description: >