I noticed that the size of the CS version is 244% compare to BS 
version. Wondering why it became so large. Does that mean Chez Scheme 
runtime/vm 100 MB larger than the original one?

Racket Mac OS X
      64-bit Intel 116.7 MB SHA1: 521b5a264afcfb3f390afacc682987268f650a25

Racket CS Mac OS X
      64-bit Intel 285.8 MB SHA1: 060f311fc6621c5797a62f98b743499fa4277793

https://pre-release.racket-lang.org/

Matthew Flatt 在 2020年7月30日 星期四下午8:46:42 [UTC+8] 的信中寫道:

> With the improvements in the upcoming v7.8 release, Racket CS provides
> all of the functionality of Racket BC (the current default
> implementation). Also, end-to-end performance measurements
> increasingly favor Racket CS. For example, Racket CS now builds a
> distribution slightly faster and in slightly less memory than Racket
> BC:
>
> https://build-plot.racket-lang.org/
>
> https://build-plot-cs.racket-lang.org/
>
> It's time to consider shifting the Racket release to use Racket CS as
> the default --- while Racket BC will remain an option for a long time
> to come.
>
> We (the release managers) propose the following rule to trigger the
> switch to Racket CS in the default distribution:
>
> Between this release and the next, if Racket CS testing and use
> uncover no bugs that are more serious than ones typically discovered
> for Racket BC, then Racket CS becomes the default for the next
> release.
>
> At the earliest, the switch would happen with the release *after* the
> soon-to-be-released v7.8. Our expectation is that the switch would
> happen with the next release (in October), but we'll see how that
> expectation lines up with reality.
>
> This rule is somewhat subjective, in that "more serious" and "typical"
> are in the eye of the beholder, but we keep a close eye on the results
> of the pkg-build service as well as Racket tests. We'll also count
> performance problems as bugs, so Racket CS must not have substantial
> known performance problems relative to Racket BC.
>
> Jay, John, Matthew, Matthias, Robby, Ryan, Sam, and Vincent
> (the release managers)
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/7f6672e4-449d-4bda-b737-a45e9ee8dc97n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to