Question: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem (in reply to RCPT TO command))

2011-09-13 Thread Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2
Hi, I have a seen a few of these messages popping up in the mail.log over the past weeks. Would someone tell me whether this is a configuration problem with my server, or a remote site? The 451 error has appeared from a couple of sites, hence I wonder if the problem lies with my site. In

Re: Question: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem (in reply to RCPT TO command))

2011-09-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.09.2011 10:54, schrieb Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2: > I have a seen a few of these messages popping up in the mail.log > over the past weeks. Would someone tell me whether this is a > configuration problem with my server, or a remote site? The 451 error > has appeared from a couple of sites

Re: Question: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem (in reply to RCPT TO command))

2011-09-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2: > > Hi, > > I have a seen a few of these messages popping up in the mail.log > over the past weeks. Would someone tell me whether this is a > configuration problem with my server, or a remote site? The 451 error > has appeared from a couple of sites, hence I won

Re: Question: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem (in reply to RCPT TO command))

2011-09-13 Thread Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2
On 09/13/2011 02:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a seen a few of these messages popping up in the mail.log >> over the past weeks. Would someone tell me whether this is a >> configuration problem with my server, or a remote site? The 451 erro

Re: Question: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem (in reply to RCPT TO command))

2011-09-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.09.2011 14:34, schrieb Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2: > On 09/13/2011 02:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a seen a few of these messages popping up in the mail.log >>> over the past weeks. Would someone tell me whether this is a >>> co

Re: Question: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem (in reply to RCPT TO command))

2011-09-13 Thread Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2
On 09/13/2011 02:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 13.09.2011 14:34, schrieb Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2: >> On 09/13/2011 02:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2: Hi, I have a seen a few of these messages popping up in the mail.log over the past

Selection of smtpd_milter using sender access

2011-09-13 Thread Jeetu
Hi, I'm using postfix 2.8.4 and trying to select smtpd_milter based on sender address. My check_sender_access is SELECT 'FILTER smtp:[127.0.0.1]:2525' and using it under smtpd_recipient_restrictions My master.cf is 127.0.0.1:2525 inet n - n - - smtpd

Re: Selection of smtpd_milter using sender access

2011-09-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Jeetu: > Hi, > > I'm using postfix 2.8.4 and trying to select smtpd_milter based on > sender address. This is simply not possible, because Milters must see the complete SMTP session. Postfix will not turn on a Milter in the middle of a session and replay previous commands to catch up. W

Re: Question: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem (in reply to RCPT TO command))

2011-09-13 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 9/13/2011 7:47 AM, Simon Loewenthal/NL/Tele2 wrote: On 09/13/2011 02:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: why is YOUR server broken if the REMOTE server says "configuration problem"? Because I had mis-read the the statement back-to-front. Now I understand it the right way around. :} You still

Re: Selection of smtpd_milter using sender access

2011-09-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Jeetu: > I get this in logs > Sep 13 18:41:50 outbound2 postfix/smtpd[29888]: NOQUEUE: filter: RCPT > from unknown[xx.xx.xx.xx]: : Sender address triggers > FILTER smtp:[127.0.0.1]:2525; from= to= > proto=ESMTP helo= > > The milter is not getting called. Your filter on [127.0.0.1]:2525 will be

Re: Bouncing an undeliverable message without waiting?

2011-09-13 Thread Bob Proulx
Jeroen Geilman wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > >The mail queue has messages addressed to unreachable addresses. I > >know that if I do nothing that eventually they will expire normally > >... > > Altering the status in-queue will be difficult, so you will have to > devise a trick. > > You can try se

Re: Bouncing an undeliverable message without waiting?

2011-09-13 Thread Bob Proulx
Wietse Venema wrote: > Bob Proulx: > > I have been trying to deduce if it is possible to force a message > > waiting in the mail queue with temporary errors (domain name > > resolution failures) to bounce right now instead of waiting for the > > timeout. > > It would be incorrect to force a messag

Re: Issue integrating with Cyrus-SASL

2011-09-13 Thread Crazedfred
> place an 'n' in the chroot column for each service Sounds good. On your advice, I went and turned off chroot, then ran "saslfinger -s" again (output attached). I restarted the saslauthd and postfix services before doing so. You can see that chroot is off for all components. Further, based on

Re: Disclaimer with always_bcc and config problems

2011-09-13 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 2011-09-13 00:42, mouss wrote: Le 13/09/2011 00:04, Jeroen Geilman a écrit : On 2011-09-12 06:21, Alex wrote: Hi, I'm trying to configure a disclaimer footer using altermime with postfix-2.7.5, amavisd-new-2.6.4. I've tried to follow the examples for creating a new filter, but the messages

Re: Issue integrating with Cyrus-SASL

2011-09-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Crazedfred: > > place an 'n' in the chroot column for each service > > Sounds good. > > On your advice, I went and turned off chroot, then ran "saslfinger -s" again > (output attached). > I restarted the saslauthd and postfix services before doing so. > You can see that chroot is off for all com

Re: Issue integrating with Cyrus-SASL

2011-09-13 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
Sorry for the delay. * Crazedfred : > I ran "saslfinger -c" and "saslfinger -s" and it does appear that many of > the relevant services are chrooted. I wasn't quite sure, however, so I > attached the full output of both commands. You want server-side debug output, which is 'saslfinger -s'. > Of