For everyone who packages kernel trees:
I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel
packaged, and it seems that this is still not straightforward:
Getting the debian package source (i.e., flat tarball) for a binary
kernel is possible, but only if it is a non-superseded ver
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> For everyone who packages kernel trees:
>>
>>
>> I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel
>> packaged, and it seems
I was specifically after solving the problem for the debianised
kernels. Android is an analogous but completely separate problem --
if you already have a solution there then great.
> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/staging-origen/#build=142
I assume people can tell from t
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 13 January 2012 11:36, Dave Martin wrote:
>> I was specifically after solving the problem for the debianised
>> kernels. Android is an analogous but completely separate problem --
>> if you already have a solu
somewhere.
Can we then plan to implement it?
If anyone has any preference for the common prefix for tag names,
please speak up (otherwise we will proceed with the "ubuntu/" prefix).
Cheers
---Dave
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:32:35PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> For everyone who packages
from start to end of that
process without falling over is minimal, and in my experience, it
doesn't happen.
I think (hopefully) that my proposal robustly fixes this, but if it
can be achieved more easily, I'm eager to know how.
Cheers
---Dave
> On 24/01/12 10:18, Dave Martin wrot
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
[...]
>
>
> For Android we have:
>
> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda-12.01-release/
>
> we should have the same thing for Ubuntu:
>
> ubuntu-build.linaro.org
>
> with the similar information.
>
I'm not sure about
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 10:01 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:59:33PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:29:34AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> >>>(I'm aware that there is
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 04:14:10PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> > In terms of finding things in the future, I have to say that there
> > is a bit of a forest of git trees in linaro. At the very least, I
> > would make s
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 12:18, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zach Pfeffer
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For Android we have:
>>>
>>&g
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> Hi Zach
>
> It takes a _long_ while to get to raw serial console login prompt of a
> stripped-down ubuntu nano image. On my core i7 (first gen) the
> simulator can sometimes reach around 1M instructions per second but is
> usually
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:33:35PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> HI.
>
> I'm building a LAVA service for running fast models. Quite soon (*)
> we'll be ready to open an alpha access. Right now you will need to
> bring your own root filesystem and kernel image to use it. With that
> in mind I wa
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:27:21AM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:49:21PM +0530, Amit wrote:
> > I am not able to install any packages related to linaro for example
> > when I tried that below command
> >
> > sudo add-apt-repository ppa:linaro-maintainers/toolch
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:59:53PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> "V, Aneesh" wrote:
>
> > I agree that not marking the assembly functions ' %function' is a problem
> > in the code, so it's not a critical bug. But I would've been happier if
> > the linker refused to link it rather than branching
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:05:54PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Andrew Stubbs wrote on 21.02.2012 11:56:07:
>
> > I'm not sure, but I believe that the compiler requires (prefers) any
> > structs that you want included inside packed structs to be themselves
> > packed, so you can end up with som
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:15:09PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> Hello Ming,
>
> could you please give some pointers to observe an overall status of
> oprofile support on ARM A9 cores? IIUC, now it doesn't work
Note -- it's important to understand that there's a difference
between oprofile/perf
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:14:11PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Dmitry Antipov
> wrote:
> > On 02/22/2012 02:57 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >
> >> I didn't use oprofile before and always use 'perf', and I am sure
> >> it works well with arm a9 pmu hardware on linus tree.
> >
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:41:22PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 05:59 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> >However, the way that the performance counter interrupts are routed is
> >dependent on the SoC. OMAP4 and later have an unusual way of doing this,
> >w
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:48:22PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not
> know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument.
>
> Among the available registers r12 seems to be the best choice because it
> is defined a
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:27:23PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:48 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not
> > know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument.
> >
> > Among the available re
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:48:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:53 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:48:22PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not
> > >
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:33:39PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 18:03 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:27:23PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:48 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > >
Hi all,
I've added some detailed info on the wiki about how to go about
building bootable images for the big.LITTLE components, here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Internal/Projects/Big.Little.Switcher/ARMFastModelsHowto
For the benefit of anyone who can't see that page, I've also pasted it
here -- if
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:20 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:33:39PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > > I don't have a very strong opinion on which register we should use, but
&
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > > I don't have a very strong opinion on which register we should use, but
&
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:21:58PM +0800, zachary6626 wrote:
> Sorry disturbing you!
>
> I have ask google for do ARM Cortex-A9 PMU supoort oprofile, but it do not
> have a answer definitely .
>
> So i ask you do ARM Cortex-A9 PMU supoort oprofile.
>
> Can u help me?
In general, yes it does wo
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:44:24PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:58 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Fe
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:52:38PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 201
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:10:29AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:58:26PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > &
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:58:23AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 02/03/12 21:15, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > [ coming back from vacation and trying to catch up ]
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> >
> >> Just had a chat with some tools guys
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
> On 08/03/12 17:21, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/03/12 21:15, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
So, to me, the gcc documentation is perfectly clear on this topic.
there really _is_ a guarantee
to patches via webmail", does anyone know a workaround?
Cheers
---Dave
- Forwarded message from Dave Martin -
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.19.176 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120321153006.ga2...@linaro.org>
References: <201203211
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:06:54AM -0600, Joey STANFORD wrote:
> Not much help but the going work-around is to not use the webmail
> interface for this and use mutt, thunderbird, etc. via imap and smtp.
> The added advantage there is you can add extensions to linkify bugs
> and such for places l
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:20:22PM -0400, Amber Graner wrote:
> I had this happen as well, when using gmail in Chromium for things that I
> would cut and paste; however, it did not happen in Firefox. The way I
> worked around it was to use Firefox or barring that I would save the email
> as a draf
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:18:36AM -0600, Joey STANFORD wrote:
> I did actually. If anyone has any examples of the "plague of question
> marks" that we think are caused by this, let me know and I'll add it
> to the case.
Now I've had a chance to look into this, it seems that the plague of
question
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:07:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 July 2012 00:27, Rob Herring wrote:
> > I would just change arm_add_memory to use phys_addr_t for the size
> > param. This ultimately calls memblock functions which use phys_addr_t
> > for sizes.
>
> So I have a patch that does
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:57:40AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/07/2012 05:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 6 July 2012 20:26, Dave Martin wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:07:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> On 6 July 2012 00:27, Rob Herring wro
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:27:05PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor.
>
> We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not
> know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument.
>
> Among the available regist
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:37:24PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:27:05PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor.
> > >
> > > We n
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 05:47:19PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Hi Andrey
>
> Can you include a new topic to linux-linaro which contains device-tree
> files for ARM's fast models? This branch is tracking-armlt-rtsm [1] in
> the ARM LT working tree.
>
> Thanks
>
> For those interested...
>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 04:26:32PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 16:10 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 4 September 2012 15:57, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > > diff --git a/string.h b/string.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000..f1aebdf
> > > --- /dev/nul
Currently, it looks like we rely on luck in order to fall through
to the correct vector when a Hyp Trap exception occurs.
This patch aligns the Hyp mode vector table explicitly to a 32-byte
boundary, as required by the architecture.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S | 24
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S| 15 +--
semi_loader.h |6 --
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S
index 128f74e..8ab68ba 100644
--- a/boot.S
+++ b/boot.S
@@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ start:
mov r7, #0xfff0
* Split Hyp mode entry out into a separate macro.
* hvc now jumps back to the caller in Hyp mode instead of
branching to a fixed label.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S | 23 +++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S
eview also welcome (naturally)
Cheers
---Dave
Dave Martin (3):
bootwrapper: Fix misaligned Hyp mode vector table
bootwrapper: Refactor entry into Hyp mode to be more reusable
bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry
boot.S
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S| 15 +--
semi_loader.h |6 --
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S
index 128f74e..fe7acdf 100644
--- a/boot.S
+++ b/boot.S
@@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ start:
mov r7, #0xfff0
Currently, it looks like we rely on luck in order to fall through
to the correct vector when a Hyp Trap exception occurs.
This patch aligns the Hyp mode vector table explicitly to a 32-byte
boundary, as required by the architecture.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S | 24
least reaches the kernel
now.
Cheers
---Dave
Dave Martin (3):
bootwrapper: Fix misaligned Hyp mode vector table
bootwrapper: Refactor entry into Hyp mode to be more reusable
bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel ent
* Split Hyp mode entry out into a separate macro.
* hvc now jumps back to the caller in Hyp mode instead of
branching to a fixed label.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S | 23 +++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S
Hi Michael,
This thread about how to generate ancillary sections using gas has
resurfaced again. Do you know who might be available from the
toolchain group to take a look at this?
It appears that this issue can best be solved by a change to gas
(or, possibly, to gcc).
Cheers
---Dave
Referenc
Hi all,
I've recently become aware that a few packages are causing alignment
faults on ARM, and are relying on the alignment fixup emulation code in
the kernel in order to work.
Such faults are very expensive in terms of CPU cycles, and can generally
only result from wrong code (for example, C/C+
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:53:21PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > >> There is still going to be a small cost even in hardware fixup so this
> > >> is very much worth solving despite it's "becoming invisible" because the
> > >> chips are hiding / solving it already.
> > >
> > > But I believe that h/w
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:17:59PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>
> > Dave Martin writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've recently become aware that a few packages are causing alignme
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:48:16AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Friday 17 June 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 17 June 2011 14:10:11 Dave Martin wro
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 03:23:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:10:11PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > For ARM, we can achieve the goal by augmenting the default kernel command-
> > line options: either
>
> > alignment=3
> >
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have booted panda board using 11.05 natty release of ubuntu. It worked
> > > great.
> > >
> > > Now,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 08:24:19AM -0500, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 01:44 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have booted panda board using 11.05 natty release of ubuntu. It worked
> >> great.
> >>
> >> Now, I am trying to compil
Hi there,
Login on patches.linaro.org appears broken. When I try to log in, I get this:
OpenID failed
OpenID discovery error: Error fetching XRDS document: (28, 'connect()
timed out!')
This has been happening for about 2 days, but it was working prior to that.
Cheers
---Dave
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:27:07PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for reporting it. This was fallout from when IS restarted the
> machine to add more disk, and they're working on it right now. It should
> be fixed RSN.
It seems to be working again now.
Thanks!
---Dave
__
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 01:10:27PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
> > I thought this was new but it has been around for awhile. My default
> > config was not turning on THUMB2 kernel so I only saw it today.
>
> Old known issue. I wonder why I didn't stumb
There are brief notes about how to enable Thumb-2 kernel building here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/KernelDeploy#From_a_generic_base
Currently, omap and vexpress are known to work in this configuration,
and mx51evk seems to have basic support. Other platforms might not
work at all.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:10 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
> Hi All,
> I've just submitted the patches for the 64 bit atomic stuff to the
> gcc-patches list.
> Richard Henderson has raised the question of why the ARM commpage isn't a full
> VDSO and, if it was, then it would make the version number che
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:03:51AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 04:21 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
> >> We could possibly wrap the vectors page to make it look like a DSO in
> >> a forwards-compatible way, but since this has not happened so far it
> >> feels like people never saw muc
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:21:27AM +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 5 July 2011 15:49, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:10 PM, David Gilbert
> > wrote:
[...]
> My patch is having to test an arbitrary address in the commpage in
> init code to see if it
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:36:30AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 09:55 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Talking to Will Deacon about this, it sounds like there may be little
> > appetite for VDSO-ifying the vectors page unless there's a real, concrete
> > be
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:29:01AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 July 2011 19:32, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:21:27AM +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> >> > Nicolas just added; Richard's ar
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:42:27AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Dave Martin writes:
> > IFUNC doesn't solve the problem because either it gets resolved
> > lazily (violating the above principle (*)), or we have to force _all_
> > symbols to resolve at startup, w
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:42:27AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Dave Martin writes:
> > IFUNC doesn't solve the problem because either it gets resolved
> > lazily (violating the above principle (*)), or we have to force _all_
> > symbols to resolve at startup, w
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:00:08PM +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 11 July 2011 12:30, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:42:27AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> Dave Martin writes:
> >> > IFUNC doesn't solve the problem because ei
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:10:24PM +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 12 July 2011 11:43, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > Just for context, I had a quick play to get a feel for the feasibility of
> > implementing this directly, without relying either on a VDSO or on IFUNC.
>
> I
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:25:09PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Sorry, should have included this in my last reply.
>
> Dave Martin writes:
> >> Also, remember this whole discussion is just to print a message and exit
> >> nicely
> >> in the case of someo
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:55:54PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to compile the kernel tree located at:
>
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/amitk/linux-linaro-pmwg.git;a=summary
What branch and what tag or he
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
> topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
> investigated and/or accomplished. I'll coordinate the work and collect
> patches for
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:42:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 28 July 2011 14:44:17 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >
> > > We could even embed the printch() function body into the DT if we
> > > wanted to make the kernel's job even simpler. Realistic implementations
> > > of this functio
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:44:17PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
> > Currently, device tree is not fully supported upstream for vexpress.
> > Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote some patches, but there were a few outstanding
> > issues and
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:41:29AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> I've used the following commands to create an Ubuntu build if it helps:
>
> wget
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-ubuntu-desktop/20110728/1/images/tar/linaro-n-ubuntu-desktop-tar-20110728-1.tar.gz
>
> wget
> http://
Can anyone see a reason not to make this change? On a couple of
occasions I've had people come to me with problems after failing to do
apt-get update and then installing (old) linaro tools packages, when
following the installation instructions on the linaro wiki. It's
harmless (and probably neces
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 05:43:08PM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 17:06 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Tixy wrote:
[...]
> I've been re-reading Documentation/SubmittingPatches to try and work out
> when it's appropriate to use
om the kernel anyways (at
>> least for such benchmark) that way you are sure you are really looking at
>> GCC improvements. similarly you can run the same user space with both
>> kernels.
>>
>>
>
> ___
> li
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:13:10PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 05:19:30PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Can anyone see a reason not to make this change? On a couple of
> > occasions I've had people come to me with problems after failing to d
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
>> Acked-by = This patch is definitely right, or I fully agree with the
>> patch and trust the author's judgement ("I will share
>> responsibility for t
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:18:10PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> > >
> > >> Acked-by = This
gn them to:
>
> http://www.launchpad.net/linaro
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Fathi Boudra, on behalf of the Release Team
> Linaro Release Manager | Platform Project Manager
> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> _
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
> the impact of bugs in releases. For example, bug 824545 means that
> the user will get an unbootable image on some boards by following our
> instructions -- that feels like the kind of thing that definitely needs to be
>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:07:44AM -0500, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
>> * Integrated patch set for Qualcomm Hexagon architecture
>
> Interesting. What exactly is this?
>
>> * The v6/v7 single kernel patches are now accepted by Russell;
Hi there,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:38:11PM +0100, Juan Gao wrote:
> Dear Linaro team,
>
> I have a problem when I try to make a module.
>
> To make the module file xx.c, I have the following command line in my
> Makefile:
>
> make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(pwd) modules
>
> a
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:42:39AM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:54:56PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.o
> > > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S: Assembler messages:
> > > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: sele
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:48:57PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Say has anyone else run oprofile on recent builds on panda?
>
> By recent I mean say anything since 11.07? Reason for asking is I'm
> seeing basically a very very small number of samples being recorded...
> as in there's no
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 11:10:10AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 September 2011 10:52, Marcin Juszkiewicz
> wrote:
> > W dniu 05.09.2011 11:28, Andrew Stubbs pisze:
> >> Next question ... is /proc/cpuinfo really the best way to detect this?
> >>
> >> I mean, is auxv a better approach? Or some
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:24:32PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 September 2011 16:09, Andy Doan wrote:
> > On 09/05/2011 11:35 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 09:10:58PM +0800, Jim Huang wrote:
> >>> 2011/9/3 Tom Gall :
> Is a method via the aux vectors t
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:47:48PM +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 6 September 2011 14:38, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>
> > I have an old kernel patch somewhere that allows userspace to read the
> > ID register
> > by emulating the relevant MRC in the illegal instruction trap handler.
> > Perhaps
>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:37:12AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2011 10:32:27 Dave Martin wrote:
> > Note that the hwcaps info in /proc/cpuinfo is generated from the same
> > hwcaps word exposed via auxv so, for now, the information is identical.
&
Hi all,
I don't remember off the top of my head who maintains status.linaro.org,
but the people summaries don't seem to be working for me:
http://status.linaro.org/11.11/people.html
I just get a page with the following.
Cheers
---Dave
People
These are all of the people. Click on any to see t
Hi all,
Over recent months I've had a steady stream of comments from
external people trying to use the Linaro deliverables about the
difficulty of getting started, understanding what Linaro produces
and how to use it.
My experience with supporting users is that using and making sense
of the lina
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:30:07AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In preparation for the release of Linaro 11.09 images on 2011-09-29, we have
> collected candidate submissions for our Linaro Evaluation Build (LEB),
> Developers and Community images.
>
> All primary developement boards supp
FYI, for people in Cambridge, UK next week
Reply to Jonathan Cameron (below) if you are interested in attending.
For up-to-date guidelines on creating keys, try this:
http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
Cheers
---Dave
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ralf Baechle
Date: Thu, Oc
Hi all,
For kernel guys and landing teams, I've posted some kernel-specific
info on mirating to Thumb-2 here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Thumb2Guide
If your kernel tree isn't building in Thumb-2 yet, please do take a look.
Let me know if you want more information on anything, o
Hi all, does anyone know why all the hwpack builds have started failing?
See, for example:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/panda/20111006/0/build-log.txt
...a similar problem seems to have affected the recent builds for every hwpack.
Looks like some build-depends package
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:22:05PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011, Deepti Kalakeri wrote:
> > > 1) The board on which the hwpack can be booted
> > > 2) The hwpack creation timestamp includes the date in mmdd format
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
